INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
Page 99
www.rsisinternational.org
Transforming Diagnostics: Cutting-Edge Techniques in Laboratory
Care
Mohamed Shawkath Abzar A
1
, Bharathi B
2*
, Deepa S
3
, Deepa C.Philip
4
1,2,4
Student, III BSc Medical lab technology, MMM College of Health Sciences, Chennai, India
3
PhD Research Scholar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology nursing, Chettinadu Academy,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
*Corresponding author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900008
Received: 31 Aug 2025; Accepted: 07 Sep 2025; Published: 10 October 2025
ABSTRACT:
Rapid and accurate diagnostic testing is critical for effective management of infectious and non-infectious
diseases, particularly in an era of emerging pathogens and antimicrobial resistance. Traditional methods such
as microscopy, culture, and serology continue to serve as valuable tools; however, their limitations in speed
and sensitivity have driven the evolution of advanced diagnostic techniques. Recent decades have seen the
integration of molecular biology, immunology, proteomics, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence (AI)
into diagnostic platforms. Innovations including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation
sequencing (NGS), CRISPR-based diagnostics, biosensors, and digital pathology are transforming laboratory
medicine into a faster, more precise, and patient-centered discipline. These advancements are not only
improving turnaround time but also enabling decentralized testing in remote and resource-limited settings,
thereby expanding access to high-quality healthcare. Furthermore, rapid diagnostics have been shown to
reduce healthcare costs by minimizing unnecessary hospital stays and ensuring timely initiation of targeted
therapy. This review highlights key developments in diagnostic technologies, their clinical applications,
challenges in global implementation, and future prospects for advancing personalized and precision
medicine.
Keywords: Diagnostic testing, Antimicrobial resistance, Molecular diagnostics, PCR, Precision medicine
INTRODUCTION
Diagnostic testing is the cornerstone of clinical decision-making and public health surveillance. Early
identification of infectious diseases reduces transmission, enables targeted therapy, and improves patient
outcomes. According to the World Health Organization, diagnostic delays contribute to millions of
preventable deaths annually, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional methods such as
microscopy and microbial culture, while cost-effective and widely used, often require long incubation times
and skilled personnel. Serological assays improve detection of host responses but lack the ability to identify
pathogens during early infection [1].
The urgent need for rapid, accurate, and cost-effective testing has led to the development of innovative
diagnostic modalities. These include nucleic acid amplification techniques, sequencing technologies,
proteomic methods, immunological assays, point-of-care devices, and AI-driven platforms. In addition to
improving patient care, such tools play a vital role in pandemic preparedness, antimicrobial stewardship, and
global health equity [2]. Diagnostic errors account for nearly 10% of preventable medical errors worldwide,
with significant consequences for both patient safety and healthcare costs. Integration of telemedicine with
diagnostic technologies is also reshaping healthcare delivery, particularly in underserved populations.
Additionally, climate change, globalization, and urbanization are accelerating the emergence of novel
infectious diseases, underscoring the need for rapid and scalable diagnostic solutions [2].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
Page 100
www.rsisinternational.org
Advances In Diagnostic Techniques
1. Molecular Diagnostics
Molecular diagnostics have revolutionized laboratory medicine by enabling the direct detection of pathogen-
specific nucleic acids.
1. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR): PCR and its variants, such as real-time PCR (qPCR) and droplet
digital PCR (ddPCR), provide sensitive, specific, and quantitative pathogen detection [3].
2. Isothermal Amplification: Methods like loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and
recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) remove the need for thermal cyclers, making them highly
suitable for field diagnostics [4].
3. CRISPR-based Diagnostics: CRISPR-Cas platforms, such as SHERLOCK and DETECTR, allow rapid
nucleic acid detection at the point of care with high sensitivity and multiplexing capacity [5].
In addition, microfluidic PCR chips and lab-on-a-disc systems are now enabling high-throughput molecular
testing outside of centralized laboratories. Multiplex PCR panels are increasingly applied in clinical settings
for respiratory pathogen panels, sepsis diagnostics, and gastrointestinal infections, allowing simultaneous
detection of multiple pathogens in a single assay [4].
2. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
NGS technologies allow simultaneous detection of known and novel pathogens, antimicrobial resistance genes,
and host-pathogen interactions. Applications include:
1. Outbreak investigations (e.g., COVID-19, Ebola, SARS-CoV-2 variants).
2. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) tracking, essential for guiding therapy [6].
3. Metagenomic sequencing, which eliminates the need for prior pathogen knowledge and detects co-
infections.
Portable sequencers such as Oxford Nanopore MinION have expanded genomic surveillance capabilities in
field and outbreak settings, enabling near real-time sequencing in resource-limited regions. Furthermore,
NGS has also become an indispensable tool in oncology, with liquid biopsy techniques detecting circulating
tumor DNA (ctDNA) to monitor treatment response, detect minimal residual disease, and guide targeted
therapies [6].
3. Immunological Assays
Immunodiagnostics remain indispensable for detecting antigens and antibodies.
1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA): Reliable and scalable, with advances in multiplexing.
2. Chemiluminescence assays: Offering improved sensitivity.
3. Rapid immunochromatographic tests: Widely used in POCT for diseases like malaria, HIV, and
COVID-19 [7].
Recent developments have focused on quantitative lateral flow assays that provide semi-quantitative results for
viral load monitoring. Microfluidic immunoassays are reducing reagent use and turnaround time, enabling
portable, low-cost platforms for infectious disease surveillance and chronic disease monitoring [7].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
Page 101
www.rsisinternational.org
4. Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has
significantly reduced diagnostic turnaround times in microbiology. Within minutes, it can identify bacteria,
fungi, and mycobacteria with high accuracy, replacing slower biochemical tests [8].
Beyond microbial identification, proteomics has enabled discovery of disease-specific biomarkers in cancer,
cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative disorders. Tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is widely
applied in newborn screening programs and in detection of inborn errors of metabolism, significantly
improving early disease management [8].
5. Nanotechnology and Biosensors
Nanotechnology-enabled biosensors, often integrated with microfluidic platforms, provide real-time detection
using minimal sample volumes. Emerging applications include wearable biosensors and smartphone-
integrated assays for field diagnostics [9].
Nanopore-based biosensors are being developed for rapid viral RNA detection, offering potential for
pandemic-scale testing. Similarly, quantum dot-based biosensors allow highly sensitive multiplex pathogen
detection and could play a key role in simultaneous screening of co-infections [10].
6. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology
AI has been increasingly applied to diagnostic workflows:
1. Image analysis: Automated interpretation of microscopy, histopathology, and radiology.
2. Predictive modeling: AI models forecast disease progression and treatment outcomes.
3. Digital pathology: Enables remote consultations and integration with electronic health systems [10].
In addition, AI is being applied to predictive outbreak modeling and antibiotic resistance forecasting,
enhancing early warning systems. Integration of AI tools with electronic medical records (EMR) is providing
decision support to clinicians, reducing diagnostic delays and improving personalized care [11].
7. Point-of-Care Testing (POCT)
POCT devices are bridging the gap between laboratory and bedside care. Portable nucleic acid kits, handheld
immunoassays, and smartphone-based readers reduce reliance on centralized labs and improve accessibility
in rural and underserved regions [11] [12].
Beyond traditional clinical use, POCT is increasingly vital in disaster zones, military medicine, and even space
healthcare. The rise of home-based diagnostic kits, including self-testing for COVID-19, pregnancy, and
sexually transmitted infections, highlights the growing shift towards patient-empowered diagnostics [13].
Clinical and Public Health Applications
Infectious diseases: Early detection of tuberculosis, HIV, malaria, influenza, and COVID-19 improves
outcomes and reduces transmission.
Cancer diagnostics: Genomic assays detect tumor mutations and guide targeted therapies.
Antimicrobial resistance: NGS and PCR panels identify resistance genes, supporting rational antibiotic
use.
Pandemic preparedness: Genomic surveillance and portable diagnostics strengthen outbreak response.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
Page 102
www.rsisinternational.org
Diagnostics are also expanding their role in non-communicable diseases. Continuous glucose monitoring
biosensors for diabetes, cardiac biomarker assays for myocardial infarction, and cerebrospinal fluid
proteomics for Alzheimer’s disease illustrate how diagnostic advances are addressing chronic conditions.
Furthermore, advanced diagnostics are contributing to vaccine development pipelines and monitoring
vaccine efficacy, thereby supporting immunization programs worldwide [14].
Challenges And Limitations
Despite remarkable progress, several barriers persist:
1. Cost and infrastructure requirements limit adoption in resource-poor settings.
2. Standardization issues across diagnostic platforms complicate global implementation.
3. Data management challenges arise from NGS and AI-driven tools, requiring secure storage and
analysis.
4. Equity concerns remain, as advanced diagnostics are often inaccessible to low-income populations.
In addition, ethical challenges have emerged regarding genetic testing privacy, informed consent, and the
potential misuse of AI-based predictive analytics. The rise of disposable diagnostic kits has also raised
environmental concerns about biomedical waste management. Regulatory frameworks for approving new
diagnostic technologies remain fragmented, slowing adoption and global harmonization [14].
Future Directions
The future of diagnostics is expected to focus on:
1. Integration of multi-omics approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics).
2. Lab-on-a-chip devices for fully automated, rapid, and multiplexed testing.
3. Personalized medicine applications, with diagnostics tailored to individual genetic and immune
profiles.
4. Global collaborations to standardize diagnostic protocols and expand accessibility.
5. Sustainable diagnostics, emphasizing affordability, portability, and minimal environmental impact.
Additional innovations on the horizon include AI-powered digital twins for personalized disease modeling and
predictive monitoring, cloud-based diagnostic networks enabling real-time global data sharing, and
nanorobotics capable of performing in vivo diagnostics at the cellular level. These transformative advances
promise to bring diagnostics closer to the patient and reshape preventive medicine.
CONCLUSION
Modern diagnostic innovations have transformed laboratory medicine, enabling earlier, faster, and more
precise disease detection. Advances in molecular biology, proteomics, immunology, and digital health tools
are not only improving patient outcomes but also reshaping public health surveillance and preparedness.
Continued research, equitable distribution, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be critical in ensuring that
next-generation diagnostics benefit patients worldwide.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. (2024). Improving diagnosis for patient safety: Reducing diagnostic
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
Page 103
www.rsisinternational.org
errors and delays. World Health Organization Technical Report Series.
2. Payne M, Holmes E. (2022). Next-Generation Technologies in Clinical Diagnostics. Journal of
Clinical Laboratory Science, 35(4), 210–222.
3. Patel R. (2021). MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Clinical Microbiology. Clinical Microbiology
Reviews, 34(1): e00055-19.
4. Smith J, Brown A. (2020). Emerging Trends in Immunodiagnostics and Point-of-Care Testing.
Frontiers in Laboratory Medicine, 2(3), 145–158.
5. Potrawa K. (2024). Advancements in diagnostic techniques for infectious diseases: A review. J Med
Microb Diagn, 13(2), 451.
6. Ting D. S. J., Cairns J., Gopal B. P., Ho C. S. et al. (2021). Risk factors, clinical outcomes, and
prognostic factors of bacterial keratitis: The Nottingham Infectious Keratitis Study. Front Med, 8,
715118.
7. Hoffman J. J., Dart J. K. G., De S. K., Carnt N. et al. (2022). Comparison of culture, confocal
microscopy and PCR in microbial keratitis diagnosis. Eye, 36, 2172–2178.
8. Wang Y. E., Tepelus T. C., Vickers L. A., Baghdasaryan E. et al. (2019). Role of in vivo confocal
microscopy in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis. Int Ophthalmol, 39, 2865–2874.
9. Curro-Tafili K., Verbraak F. D., de Vries R., van Nispen R. M. A. et al. (2024). Diagnosing and
monitoring Acanthamoeba keratitis using confocal microscopy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 44, 131–152.
10. Zhang Y., Xu X., Wei Z., Cao K., Zhang Z., Liang Q. (2023). The global epidemiology and clinical
diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 16(6), 841–852.
11. Li S., Bian J., Wang Y., Wang S. et al. (2020). Clinical features and serial changes of Acanthamoeba
keratitis: An in vivo confocal microscopy study. Eye, 34, 327–334.
12. Wu A. W., Papieva I., McDonald K., Dhingra N. et al. (2024). Getting the diagnosis right: World
Patient Safety Day 2024. Learning from diagnostic errors in health care. SAGE Journals.
13. Singh H., Schiff G. D., Graber M. L., Onakpoya I. et al. (2016). The global burden of diagnostic errors
in primary care. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(6), 484–494.
14. Kruk M. E., Gage A. D., Arsenault C., Jordan K. et al. (2018). Mortality due to low-quality health
systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137
countries. The Lancet Global Health, 6(12), e1196–e1205.
