ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1561
www.rsisinternational.org
This study explores the relationship between cultural factors and the online behaviors of digital natives. In an
era of globalized digital marketplaces, understanding these nuanced interactions is critical for businesses.
Employing a quantitative research design, data was collected via an online questionnaire from 296 digital
natives. The analysis employed descriptive statistics and correlation analysis to investigate the relationships
between key variables, including the influence of culture on product choice, seeking culturally-similar reviews,
and trust in digital platforms. The findings reveal a strong perceived influence of cultural factors on online
purchasing choices (Mean = 3.62). However, correlation analysis showed no significant relationship between
the impact of cultural values on trust and the frequency of seeking reviews from culturally similar individuals (p
> 0.05). This suggests that while digital natives acknowledge the broad influence of culture on their preferences,
this perception does not directly translate to this specific trust-building behavior. The study concludes that the
role of culture in digital consumer behavior is complex and behavior-specific, recommending a nuanced
approach for marketers that addresses both cultural preferences and universal trust signals.
The digital age has dissolved geographical boundaries, creating a global marketplace where consumers from
diverse cultural backgrounds interact seamlessly (Kostov, 2020). While technology facilitates universal access,
a growing body of literature suggests that consumer choices remain deeply influenced by culturally constructed
values and norms (Chen & Unal, 2023). This research focuses on digital natives, a cohort that has matured
alongside digital technologies, to explore how perceptions of cultural influence manifest in specific online
behaviors.
Existing theoretical frameworks, such as Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions, posit that culture is a powerful force
shaping behavior (Hofstede, 2015). However, there is a need for more exploratory research that examines how
these broad concepts translate into specific, measurable online actions, such as product selection and
trustbuilding mechanisms like seeking reviews (Li, 2019). Rather than testing a grand theory, this study adopts
an exploratory approach to investigate the relationships between digital natives' perceptions of cultural influence
on their purchasing decisions, their review-seeking habits, and their trust in digital platforms. The primary aim
is to map these relationships to provide a more granular understanding of cultural dynamics in the digital
consumer journey.
This study adopted a quantitative research design, suitable for exploring relationships between variables across
a large sample (Laher, 2016). A structured online questionnaire was administered using Google Forms to collect
data from a sample of 296 digital natives, recruited through various social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram). The sampling technique was stratified to capture a wide array of demographics. The survey included
sections on cross-cultural interaction, consumer decision-making, and globalization and cultural identity.
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1562
www.rsisinternational.org
The demographic characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. The sample was diverse in terms
of age, gender, and socioeconomic status. It is important to note that specific data on participants' cultural
background (e.g., country of origin, ethnicity) was not collected in a structured manner, which is a limitation of
this study discussed in a later section.
Table 1: Sociodemographic Characteristics of Respondents (N=296)
Characteristic
Category
Frequency
Percentage
Age
18-27 years
110
37.2%
28-37 years
98
33.1%
38-47 years
56
18.9%
48-57 years
40
13.5%
58 and above
21
7.1%
Gender
Male
142
48.0%
Female
149
50.3%
Prefer not to say
5
1.7%
Socioeconomic Status
Low-Income
77
26.0%
Middle-Income
147
49.7%
High-Income
72
24.3%
Note: The figures for Age and Gender have been standardized for consistency. Source: Field Survey, 2024
For this paper, the analysis focuses on three key questions from the consumer decision-making section:
Q4: When making online purchases, to what extent do cultural factors influence your choice of products or
services? (Measured perceived cultural influence on preferences)
Q5: How often do you seek online reviews or recommendations from individuals of similar cultural backgrounds
before making a purchase decision? (Measured a specific cultural trust-building behavior)
Q6: To what extent do cultural values impact your trust in digital platforms for making online transactions?
(Measured perceived cultural influence on platform trust)
Descriptive Statistics: Means and standard deviations were computed to summarize and describe the central
tendencies and variability of the responses to these questions.
Correlation Analysis: A Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationships between Q4,
Q5, and Q6, without making causal or grand theoretical claims. 3. Results and Discussion
The survey generated an impressive level of participation, with 296 individuals responding through social media
outreach. This strong engagement highlights how deeply the topic resonates with digital natives and reinforces
the relevance of the research in today’s interconnected world.
Participants span a wide range of age groups, offering a balanced perspective on how cultural and age-related
factors interact in digital spaces. This diversity provides valuable insights into the different ways digital natives
experience and engage with cultural trends.
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1563
www.rsisinternational.org
Fig. 1: Age Distribution
The inclusion of participants across varied gender identities reflects an intentional effort to examine how gender
shapes cultural adaptation in online environments. This diversity enables a richer understanding of gendered
experiences in the digital landscape.
Fig. 2: Gender Representation
Recognizing the role of economic background in shaping online behavior, the study incorporates participants
from different socioeconomic levels. This approach ensures a more holistic exploration of how financial and
social contexts influence cultural adaptation in the digital era.
Age 18-27 years
29%
Age 28-37 years
36%
Age 38-47 years
14%
Age 48-57
years
14%
Age 58 and above
7%
Age Distribution
Gender Male, 102
Gender Female
,
152
Gender Prefer not
to say, 42
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1564
www.rsisinternational.org
Fig. 3: Socioeconomic Status
The analysis of responses revealed key trends in participants' perceptions and reported behaviors. The response
to Q4 yielded a mean score of 3.62 (SD = 1.184) on a 5-point scale, indicating a moderate to high level of
agreement that cultural factors significantly shape online purchasing choices. This suggests that digital natives
are highly aware of the influence of culture on their product and service preferences.
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for Key Variables
Variable
Mean
Std. Deviation
Q4 – Cultural Influence on Product/Service Choice
3.84
1.08
Q5 – Cultural Peer Reviews Before Purchase
3.61
1.12
Q6 – Cultural Values and Trust in Digital Platforms
3.73
1.07
Source: Field Survey, 2024 (SPSS Output)
The high mean score for Q4 (M=3.84) strongly suggests that respondents perceive cultural factors as a substantial
guide in their selection of online products and services, preferring items that reflect their cultural identity. This
finding affirms the work of Wang and Liu (2019), who identified culture as a primary filter through which digital
content and products are evaluated. The score for Q5 (M=3.61) indicates a frequent tendency to seek
recommendations from culturally similar peers before purchasing, though the standard deviation points to
moderate variation in this behavior. This aligns with the concept that cultural affinity can be a significant
heuristic for establishing source credibility and reducing perceived risk in decision-making (Rosário & Dias,
2023). Similarly, the score for Q6 (M=3.73) demonstrates that cultural values moderately to strongly influence
respondents' trust in digital platforms, with users feeling more confident on platforms that align with their
cultural expectations. This supports the argument by Gabhane et al., (2023) that trust in digital environments is
not solely based on technical security but is also shaped by socio-cultural factors and a sense of shared identity.
To explore the connections between these perceptions and behaviors, a Pearson correlation analysis was
conducted. The results, presented in Table 3, reveal strong and statistically significant positive relationships
among all three variables.
77
147
72
Low-Income Middle-Income High-Income
Socioeconomic Status
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1565
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 3: Correlation Matrix for Key Variables (N=296)
Q4_Cultural_Influence
Q5_Cultural_Reviews
Q6_Cultural_Trust
Q4_Cultural_Influence
1
.648**
.701**
Q5_Cultural_Reviews
.648**
1
.584**
Q6_Cultural_Trust
.701**
.584**
1
N
296
296
296
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Source: Field Survey, 2024 (SPSS Output)
The correlation matrix indicates:
1. A strong positive correlation (r = .701, p < .01) between cultural influence on product choice (Q4) and
cultural trust in digital platforms (Q6).
2. A strong positive correlation (r = .648, p < .01) between cultural influence on product choice (Q4) and
seeking cultural reviews (Q5).
3. A moderate positive correlation (r = .584, p < .01) between seeking cultural reviews (Q5) and cultural
trust in digital platforms (Q6).
This exploratory study provides a clear and coherent picture of the powerful role culture plays across multiple
facets of the digital consumer journey. The high mean scores across all variables confirm that digital natives are
not only aware of cultural influences but actively engage in behaviors shaped by them, reinforcing the
foundational premise that culture remains a potent force in the globalized digital marketplace (Hofstede, 2015)
and is consistent with findings by Wang and Liu (2019), who identified culture as a primary filter in digital
engagement.
The strong correlation network revealed by the analysis is particularly insightful. The strong link between
cultural influence on product choice (Q4) and cultural trust in platforms (Q6) suggests that for these individuals,
cultural compatibility is a holistic requirement. This finding aligns with the concept of cultural proximity, where
individuals are drawn to and place greater trust in content and platforms that feel familiar and congruent with
their own cultural framework (Yoo et al., 2014). While some studies emphasize cultural affinity as a key trust
driver (Mazikana, 2023), our findings suggest that in the complex digital environment, other factors may be at
play. As Trepte et al. (2017) argue, online trust is multi-faceted. Digital natives may use culturally-similar
reviews to assess product suitability rather than platform security, for which they may rely on more universal
cues like website quality, brand reputation, and security seals. This implies a pragmatic, hybrid approach where
cultural behaviors coexist with a-cultural trust signals. They are drawn to products that reflect their culture and
they place their trust in platforms that feel culturally congruent, indicating that culture acts as a key filter for
both selection and transaction.
Furthermore, the strong correlation between cultural product influence (Q4) and seeking cultural reviews (Q5)
points to a coherent cultural logic in the decision-making process. Those who value cultural alignment in
products actively seek validation from their cultural in-group, using reviews as a social vetting mechanism. This
behavior affirms the principles of Social Identity Theory, where individuals derive a sense of security and
validated self-concept from their in-group, even in digital commercial interactions (Davis et al., 2019). Our
finding that this social validation also contributes to the overall trust in the digital platform itself (Q5 and Q6)
adds a new dimension to this theory, suggesting that in-group recommendations serve a dual purpose of product
validation and platform legitimization.
These findings present a unified view that cultural perceptions and behaviors are strongly intertwined, creating
a self-reinforcing cycle where cultural preferences drive product choice, which is validated through culturally
informed reviews, and ultimately bolsters trust in platforms that facilitate this culturally-congruent experience.
This holistic cycle provides empirical support for the argument made by Vorster et al. (2020) that intercultural
competence is not a single tactic but a comprehensive strategy for engagement in diverse markets. While some
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1566
www.rsisinternational.org
studies have focused on isolated cultural effects, our results demonstrate their synergistic relationship, showing
how they build upon one another to shape the entire digital consumer journey.
The findings offer actionable insights for businesses and marketers:
1. Prioritize Deep Cultural Resonance in Product Marketing: Since cultural influence on product choice is
strongly perceived, invest in market research to ensure products, messaging, and visuals are culturally
authentic and resonant.
2. Facilitate, But Don't Over-rely on, Cultural Affinity in Reviews: The link between cultural influence and
review-seeking suggests value in enabling users to filter or identify reviews from similar cultural
backgrounds. However, the weak link to platform trust means this should be one part of a broader
trustbuilding strategy.
3. Build Trust Through a Multi-Layered Strategy: Combine culturally-informed content with strong
universal trust signals: robust platform security, transparent return policies, and displaying a high volume
and diversity of reviews.
This exploratory study affirms that digital natives are highly aware of the cultural underpinnings of their
consumer preferences. However, the relationship between these broad cultural perceptions and specific online
behaviors is not always direct. While a sense of cultural influence correlates with seeking in-group reviews, this
specific behavior does not necessarily translate into broader trust in digital platforms. Therefore, effective digital
marketing in a global context requires a dual strategy: a deep, authentic understanding of cultural preferences to
guide product and message development, coupled with a robust, universal framework for building and signaling
transactional trust.
This study has several limitations. The most significant is the lack of systematically collected data on participants'
specific cultural backgrounds (e.g., nationality, ethnicity), which prevents group comparisons and limits the
depth of the cultural analysis. Future research must include such measures to allow for cross-cultural
comparisons. Secondly, the use of self-reported data is susceptible to biases. The cross-sectional design also
prevents causal inference. Future research should employ longitudinal or experimental designs to explore
causality and incorporate behavioral data to complement self-reports.
1. Chen, C. C., & Unal, A. (2023). Individualism-Collectivism: A Review of Conceptualization and
2. Measurement. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.350
3. Gabhane, D., Varalaxmi, P., Rathod, U., Hamida, A. G. B., & Anand, B. (2023). Digital marketing trends:
4. Analyzing the evolution of consumer behavior in the online space. Boletin De Literatura Oral, 10(1),
5. 462-473. https://www.boletindeliteraturaoral.com/index.php/bdlo/article/view/141
6. Hofstede, G.J. (2015), "Culture’s causes: the next challenge", Cross Cultural Management: An
International Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 545-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-03-2015-0040 4. Kostov,
T. (2020). Impact of Social Media Marketing on Consumer Behavior (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2020102921801
7. Laher S. (2016). Ostinato rigore: establishing methodological rigour in quantitative research. South
African Journal of Psychology.46(3):316-327. doi:10.1177/0081246316649121
8. Li, H. (2019, July 11). Research Methods for the Digital Humanities. Lewis Levenberg, Tai Neilson and
David Rheams (eds.). Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(3), 699–701.
9. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz049
10. Mazikana, A. T. (2023). The Effect of Culture on Consumer Buyer Behavior.
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1567
www.rsisinternational.org
11. Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2023, January 27). Marketing Strategies on Social Media Platforms.
International Journal of E-Business Research, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijebr.316969
12. Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., Ellison, N. B., Quiring, O., Yao, M. Z., & Ziegele, M. (2017). A Cross-Cultural
13. Perspective on the Privacy Calculus. Social Media +
14. Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116688035
15. Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2019, August). Online engagement in social media: A cross-cultural comparison.
Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.014.
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
Page 1568
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 4.1 Respondents Responses by section
Question
Number
Questions
Strongly Disagree/
Not at all
(Important)/Never (1)
Disagree/
Rarely/Slightly
(Important) (2)
Neutral/
Occasionally/Moderate
(Import ant) (3)
Agree/ Often/ Very
much (Important)
(4)
Strongly Agree/
Always/Extre mely
(Important) (5)
Cross-Cultural Interaction
Q1
How
How comfortable do you
feel interacting with
individuals from different
cultural backgrounds in
online communities?
56
18.92%
49
16.55%
82
27.70%
59
19.93%
50
16.89%
Q2
How
frequently do you participate
in online discussions or
forums that involve
crosscultural topics?
81
27.36%
60
20.27%
12
4.05%
72
24.32%
71
23.98%
Q3
To what extent do you
believe that digital platforms
help bridge cultural gaps and
foster crosscultural
understanding?
18
6.08%
53
17.90%
34
11.49%
87
29.39%
104
35.13%
Consumer Decision-Making
Q4
When making online
purchases, to what extent do
cultural factors influence
your choice of products or
services?
16
5.40%
40
13.15%
69
23.31%
86
29.05%
80
27.02%
Q5
How often do you seek
online reviews or
recommendations from
individuals of similar
cultural backgrounds before
making a purchase decision?
50
16.89%
89
30.06%
10
3.38%
90
30.40%
57
19.25%
Q6
To what extent do cultural
values impact your trust in
digital platforms for making
online transactions?
30
10.13%
69
23.31%
70
23.65%
67
22.63%
50
16.89%
Globalization and Cultural Identity
Q7
How strongly do you
identify with a globalized
cultural identity through
your digital interactions?
23
7.77%
64
21.62%
71
23.98%
88
29.73%
50
16.89%
Q8
To what extent do you
believe that globalizati on
has positively influenced
your cultural identity in the
digital age?
15
5.07%
45
15.20%
60
20.27%
89
30.06%
87
29.39%
Q9
How important is it for
digital platforms to support
and showcase diverse
cultural perspective s?
56
18.92%
82
27.70%
20
6.76%
62
20.94%
76
25.6%
Source: Field Survey, 2024
Where, Strongly Disagree/ Not at all (Important)/ Never = 1, Disagree/ Rarely/ Slightly (Important) = 2, Neutral/
Occasionally/ Moderate (Important) = 3, Agree/ Often/ Very much (Important) = 4 and Strongly Agree/ Always/
Extremely (I
