Figure Shows: Historical Settlements of Kolakopa
5. The Present condition of the study area: The actual number of heritage buildings remaining in the
study area could not be traced completely due to the lack of evidence. Twenty-one buildings could only be
found in Nagar Kashba during the study;
5.1
Conditions of the Heritage Buildings: Kolakopa House, a prominent example of colonial-era
residential architecture, was originally constructed by elite merchants during the British colonial period. These
doublecourtyard mansions symbolized the wealth, power, and refined taste of the mercantile elite of that time
(Ahmed, 1984). The architectural layout emphasized both privacy and ventilation, blending local
craftsmanship with colonial stylistic influences (Islam, 2003). Following the partition of India, the original
owners of Kolakopa House migrated permanently to India, leaving the property vulnerable to encroachment.
Over the decades, various individuals unlawfully occupied portions of the land and buildings, while others
purchased sections from those occupants (Rahman & Karim, 2019). Today, ownership is highly fragmented.
Many of the current owners reside in Dhaka or abroad and benefit financially by renting out their portions
rather than maintaining the structure. Initially, the mansion had a single owner; however, with family
expansion and inheritance divisions, ownership has dispersed among numerous heirs. As the number of owners
increased, the available living space became inadequate, and disputes over maintenance and usage grew more
frequent (Chowdhury, 2015).
The physical condition of Kolakopa House has deteriorated severely due to neglect, low maintenance, and
unsympathetic alterations. In an attempt to modernize the building, residents have made structural changes—
such as adding toilets in courtyards, erecting partitions, or removing original walls and openings—that have
compromised the architectural integrity (Islam & Hossain, 2017). Some sections have even been replaced with
new constructions, erasing significant historical features. Wealthier owners have completely demolished
certain parts to build multi-storied contemporary structures, perceiving them as more efficient and
economically productive. Meanwhile, those unable to afford such redevelopment have continued modifying
existing portions haphazardly. These unplanned interventions have resulted in the gradual loss of authenticity
and cultural value (Hasan, 2020).
Rapid urbanization, increasing land values, and population growth have intensified the commercialization of
the surrounding area. The trend of renting rooms to businessmen, students, and shop owners has become
common, accelerating the transformation of the house’s original character (Rahman, 2018). Authorities’
negligence and lack of effective heritage conservation policies have further aggravated the situation. Moreover,
socio-economic constraints discourage residents from preserving the property. Even when they acknowledge
the building’s heritage value, they lack both the financial capacity and institutional support to undertake
conservation measures (Islam & Hossain, 2017). Kolakopa House represents an irreplaceable part of the
region’s architectural and cultural heritage. Yet, it is increasingly viewed as obsolete and unproductive—a
burden rather than a legacy. Some residents fear that officially declaring it a protected heritage site could
restrict their rights or reduce their control over the property (Hasan, 2020). Without urgent conservation efforts,
this valuable historical monument may vanish entirely, taking with it the collective memory and cultural
identity of its community (Ahmed, 1984; Rahman & Karim, 2019).
5.2
Structural, Infrastructural and Environmental Conditions and Its Evolution: The structural,
infrastructural, and environmental conditions surrounding Kolakopa House are deteriorating rapidly. The
overall state of the mythological and historical establishment has become extremely fragile, verging on
collapse. The setting reflects a sense of chaos and disorganization. In the immediate vicinity, modern buildings
have encroached both in front of and behind the heritage structure, leaving no setback or visual buffer. This
haphazard urban growth has destroyed the harmony that once characterized the site. Previously, the Ichamati
River flowed close to the Kasba, providing a natural linkage and ecological balance. Over time, however, the
river has receded significantly, and its tributaries and connecting channels have disappeared. Many of the
ponds and small water streams that once sustained the settlement have dried up, leaving barren areas now
Page 2533