Archiving Kolakopa - A Study on the Present Condition and the  
Architectural Features of an Evanescing Historic Settlement.  
Latifa Sultana1, Shahriar Hasan Mridha Ratul2, Md Maraj Mahmud3, Md Mahbubur Rahman4,  
Fatema Akter5, Tanmaya Saha6, Kazi Kamal Apon7, Taisun Halder8  
1Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh  
2B.Arch. Graduate, Department of Architecture, Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh  
3,4,5,6,7,8Student, Department of Architecture, Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh  
Received: 09 November 2025; Accepted: 15 November 2025; Published: 26 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Bangladesh, a land of profound historical and cultural wealth, holds numerous unrecorded heritage settlements  
that narrate the story of its glorious past. Among these, Kolakopa, located in Ancient Dhaka the ancient capital  
of Bengal stands as a remarkable yet endangered example of vernacular and colonial architectural synthesis.  
The settlement reflects a harmonious blend of Mughal spatial traditions and British Colonial aesthetics,  
showcasing the lifestyle and socio-economic identity of the region’s elite merchant class during the colonial  
period. The courtyard-based houses, adorned with ornamented facades, arched verandas, and intricate  
detailing, embody both artistic excellence and climatic responsiveness. Over time, however, urban  
encroachment, neglect, and unauthorized modifications have led to the gradual decay of these architectural  
gems. Following the post-1971 socio-political shifts, many of these heritage houses were occupied or altered  
without regard for their historical value. As a result, structural deterioration, incompatible renovations, and  
weathering have threatened the settlement’s original character. Despite its significance as a living repository of  
Bengal’s cultural heritage, Kolakopa remains largely undocumented and overlooked by conservation  
authorities. This paper aims to document and analyze the architectural and spatial characteristics of the  
Kolakopa settlement, assess its current condition, and highlight the urgent need for systematic conservation.  
Through visual and descriptive documentation, the study seeks to raise awareness about the importance of  
preserving Kolakopa’s unique architectural identity, providing a foundation for future restoration strategies and  
sustainable heritage management.  
Keywords: Kolakopa, Historic Settlement, Architectural Documentation, Built Heritage, Conservation  
INTRODUCTION:  
Architecture that transcends historical timelines serves as a vital conduit between the past, present, and future,  
embodying the cultural continuity of a civilization. Such built environments are not merely physical structures  
but also repositories of collective memory, reflecting the socio-economic, artistic, and political narratives that  
have shaped a nation’s identity. In this regard, Bangladesh possesses a rich and diverse architectural heritage  
encompassing multiple historical periods. Yet, this legacy is increasingly under threat from rapid urbanization,  
unplanned development, and neglect, which continue to engulf historic settlements and diminish the nation’s  
tangible and intangible cultural assets.  
Among the endangered sites stands Kolakopa, located in Dhaka, a historically significant district of ancient  
civilization. During the early 19th century, under British colonial rule, a community of affluent Hindu  
merchants established a medium township in the Kolakopa area, constructed upon the remnants of an earlier  
ruined settlement (Rahman, 2017). The spatial pattern of this settlementcharacterized by street-front  
Page 2529  
houses” arranged along a narrow alley locally known as Hindu Paraillustrates an intricate adaptation of  
colonial urban morphology within a traditional Bengali context. Historically, the area was bordered by canals  
and moats (khals), which enhanced its environmental and aesthetic value. Although the original owners of  
these buildings have long departed, the structures remain inhabited, often in dilapidated and deteriorating  
conditions, with current residents largely unaware of their historic importance. The architectural ensemble of  
Nagar Kashba embodies the romanticized charm of colonial-era domestic architecture, blending stylistic  
ornamentation with vernacular sensibility. Given its unique cultural and architectural significance, this  
evanescing living archaeological site demands urgent documentation and conservation before irreversible loss  
occurs.  
Historical Background and Context: Kolakopa is located within the Nawabganj Upazila of Dhaka District, a  
region deeply embedded in the historical and cultural fabric of Bengal. Once part of the greater Bikrampur  
territory, Nawabganj shared its legacy as a prominent administrative and trading zone that flourished from the  
early medieval period through the Mughal and British Colonial eras. Although the political center of Bengal  
gradually shiftedfrom Bikrampur to Sonargaon in the 13th century, and later to Dhaka in the 17th century—  
Kolakopa and its surrounding areas continued to thrive due to their strategic location along the fertile riverine  
belt of central Bengal. Enclosed by the Ichamati, Buriganga, and Dhaleshwari rivers, the Nawabganj region  
developed as an active commercial and cultural corridor, facilitating both inland and regional trade. During the  
Colonial period, this accessibility attracted wealthy Hindu and Muslim merchant families, who established  
residential settlements reflecting a distinctive fusion of local vernacular traditions and British Colonial  
architectural motifs. Kolakopa, as one of these historic settlements, became a vibrant microcosm of Bengal’s  
evolving urban and socio-economic character. Over successive centuries, Kolakopa retained its importance as a  
mercantile and agrarian hub, while its built environment reflected the stylistic transitions that accompanied  
changes in governance and trade dynamics. Today, the architectural remnants of Kolakopa stand as enduring  
witnesses to a hybrid cultural landscape, bridging the aesthetic, economic, and historical continuum of  
Bengal’s architectural heritage.  
Figure Shows: Location of Kolakopa at Nababganj in Dhaka; Distance between Dhaka to Kolakopa.  
The term Kasba (or Qasbah in Arabic) refers to an administrative and commercial settlement, typically situated  
between rural villages and larger cities. In medieval Bengal, particularly under the Bengal Sultanate (1342–  
1576) and later the Mughal Empire, kasbas played a critical role in regional governance, commerce, and  
security (Khan, 2016). These settlements were strategically located near trade routes, rivers, or other  
significant geographical features, which enabled them to serve as hubs for trade, local administration, and  
sometimes military activity (Nasser, 2020). A kasba was governed by local officials such as the kotwal,  
responsible for policing, and the quazi, who oversaw legal and religious matters. Kasbas functioned not only as  
market towns but also as the focal points of administrative control within larger districts (Rahman, 2018).  
Betila, located within the historical landscape of Manikganj, was likely one of these kasbas. Its advantageous  
Page 2530  
location along the Kaliganga and Dhaleshwari rivers suggests it was a vital trade and administrative center  
during the Sultanate, Mughal, and colonial periods (Chakraborty, 2017). Though its significance may have  
waned over time, the term Kasba in Betila’s name continues to reflect its historical importance as a commercial  
and administrative hub in medieval Bengal (Hossain, 2015).  
Kolakopa Union is a historic locality under Nawabganj Upazila of Dhaka District, in the Dhaka Division of  
Bangladesh. The entire administrative center of Nawabganj Upazila is situated within Kolakopa Union, which  
also serves as the cultural and civic heart of the region. Formed through a unique blend of geography, rivers,  
architecture, and folk traditions, this area has long developed as a hub of history, culture, and economic  
activity.  
During the nineteenth century, the KolakopaBandura area was one of the most important commercial centers  
in the southwestern part of Dhaka District. Located along the banks of the Ichamati River, the locality  
flourished rapidly due to river-based trade and transportation. The presence of affluent zamindar (landlord)  
families and the architectural landmarks they built still bear witness to that glorious past. Among the most  
notable local landlord families were Brajen Saha, Radhanath Saha, Loknath Saha (of Telibari/Mathbari), and  
the Kokilpeari family. Their residencessuch as Braja Niketan (now popularly known as Joj Bari or “Judge’s  
House”), Telibari, Painnabari, and Ukil Bari—were constructed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries,  
following the Greco-Doric architectural style. These buildings stand not only as examples of architectural  
heritage but also as reflections of the social prestige, wealth, and refined taste of that era.  
Kolakopa Union is also a shining example of religious coexistence. The region is home to several places of  
worship, including the Khelaram Data Bigraha Temple, Mahamaya Devi Temple, Kali Temple, and the Church  
of Our Lady of the Rosary (locally known as Jopomala Rani’r Girja), built in 1777 AD. These structures  
symbolize the spiritual traditions of both Hindu and Christian communities. The church, constructed in Gothic  
architectural style, holds particular significance; its intricate design, large bell, and yellow-toned structure  
make it one of the oldest surviving churches in Bangladesh. A fascinating local legend surrounds the  
Mahamaya Temple: it is said that the deity there is represented by a massive tree trunk, which once bled a red  
fluid when someone tried to cut it. Since 1335 Bengali Year, worship has been continuously performed here.  
Such folklore reflects the deep-rooted spiritual and cultural fabric of Kolakopa’s people.  
During the colonial period, the KolakopaBandura region experienced considerable commercial growth. Local  
entrepreneurs like Madhubabu of Painnabari, Loknath Babu of Telibari, and Radhanath Saha amassed wealth  
through diverse businesses. Industries such as oil pressing, betel trading, and handloom weaving played a vital  
role in the local economy. The traditional handloom craft of Samsabad and Alalpur areas was once a hallmark  
of this region, though it is now on the verge of extinction. Still, a few dedicated weavers strive to keep this  
ancient craft alive. At the heart of Kolakopa’s heritage stands Braja Niketan, also known as the “Judge’s  
House.” In the 1980s, the residence gained its current name when a judge’s family began living there. Today, it  
serves as a local tourist attraction, surrounded by trees and even a small herd of deer that draw visitors year-  
round. Unfortunately, many historic buildingssuch as the residence of Radhanath Sahahave either fallen  
into ruin or disappeared under private ownership. Kolakopa Union, therefore, is not merely an administrative  
territory— it is one of Dhaka District’s most culturally and architecturally significant localities. Formed  
through the legacy of its zamindar families, religious diversity, river-centric economy, and rich folk traditions,  
Kolakopa remains a site of historical interest and a living testament to Bengal’s enduring cultural heritage.  
METHODOLOGY:  
This study adopts a qualitative and descriptive approach to analyze the architectural characteristics, present  
condition, and conservation prospects of Kolakopa House. Field surveys were conducted to collect primary  
data, including detailed measurements, photographic documentation, and visual observations.  
Page 2531  
Interviews with local residents provided insights into the historical background and cultural significance of the  
site. The surrounding environment, access routes, and supporting infrastructure were also examined to  
understand their influence on the building’s current state.  
A comparative analysis was then carried out with other colonial-era residences in the region to identify  
similarities in spatial organization and architectural style. This helped position Kolakopa House within the  
broader context of Bengal’s colonial heritage. All collected data were systematically compiled and analyzed to  
propose potential conservation strategies. The objective of the study is to promote sustainable preservation of  
Kolakopa House as a vital element of local architectural and cultural identity.  
4. Evolution of the settlement of Kolakopa: From the structural pattern of the heritage buildings, the  
chronological development of the area could be traced.  
Figure Shows: Historical Settlements of Kolakopa  
Page 2532  
Figure Shows: Historical Settlements of Kolakopa  
5. The Present condition of the study area: The actual number of heritage buildings remaining in the  
study area could not be traced completely due to the lack of evidence. Twenty-one buildings could only be  
found in Nagar Kashba during the study;  
5.1  
Conditions of the Heritage Buildings: Kolakopa House, a prominent example of colonial-era  
residential architecture, was originally constructed by elite merchants during the British colonial period. These  
doublecourtyard mansions symbolized the wealth, power, and refined taste of the mercantile elite of that time  
(Ahmed, 1984). The architectural layout emphasized both privacy and ventilation, blending local  
craftsmanship with colonial stylistic influences (Islam, 2003). Following the partition of India, the original  
owners of Kolakopa House migrated permanently to India, leaving the property vulnerable to encroachment.  
Over the decades, various individuals unlawfully occupied portions of the land and buildings, while others  
purchased sections from those occupants (Rahman & Karim, 2019). Today, ownership is highly fragmented.  
Many of the current owners reside in Dhaka or abroad and benefit financially by renting out their portions  
rather than maintaining the structure. Initially, the mansion had a single owner; however, with family  
expansion and inheritance divisions, ownership has dispersed among numerous heirs. As the number of owners  
increased, the available living space became inadequate, and disputes over maintenance and usage grew more  
frequent (Chowdhury, 2015).  
The physical condition of Kolakopa House has deteriorated severely due to neglect, low maintenance, and  
unsympathetic alterations. In an attempt to modernize the building, residents have made structural changes—  
such as adding toilets in courtyards, erecting partitions, or removing original walls and openingsthat have  
compromised the architectural integrity (Islam & Hossain, 2017). Some sections have even been replaced with  
new constructions, erasing significant historical features. Wealthier owners have completely demolished  
certain parts to build multi-storied contemporary structures, perceiving them as more efficient and  
economically productive. Meanwhile, those unable to afford such redevelopment have continued modifying  
existing portions haphazardly. These unplanned interventions have resulted in the gradual loss of authenticity  
and cultural value (Hasan, 2020).  
Rapid urbanization, increasing land values, and population growth have intensified the commercialization of  
the surrounding area. The trend of renting rooms to businessmen, students, and shop owners has become  
common, accelerating the transformation of the house’s original character (Rahman, 2018). Authorities’  
negligence and lack of effective heritage conservation policies have further aggravated the situation. Moreover,  
socio-economic constraints discourage residents from preserving the property. Even when they acknowledge  
the building’s heritage value, they lack both the financial capacity and institutional support to undertake  
conservation measures (Islam & Hossain, 2017). Kolakopa House represents an irreplaceable part of the  
region’s architectural and cultural heritage. Yet, it is increasingly viewed as obsolete and unproductive—a  
burden rather than a legacy. Some residents fear that officially declaring it a protected heritage site could  
restrict their rights or reduce their control over the property (Hasan, 2020). Without urgent conservation efforts,  
this valuable historical monument may vanish entirely, taking with it the collective memory and cultural  
identity of its community (Ahmed, 1984; Rahman & Karim, 2019).  
5.2  
Structural, Infrastructural and Environmental Conditions and Its Evolution: The structural,  
infrastructural, and environmental conditions surrounding Kolakopa House are deteriorating rapidly. The  
overall state of the mythological and historical establishment has become extremely fragile, verging on  
collapse. The setting reflects a sense of chaos and disorganization. In the immediate vicinity, modern buildings  
have encroached both in front of and behind the heritage structure, leaving no setback or visual buffer. This  
haphazard urban growth has destroyed the harmony that once characterized the site. Previously, the Ichamati  
River flowed close to the Kasba, providing a natural linkage and ecological balance. Over time, however, the  
river has receded significantly, and its tributaries and connecting channels have disappeared. Many of the  
ponds and small water streams that once sustained the settlement have dried up, leaving barren areas now  
Page 2533  
marked only by remnants of stone steps that once led to the water. The ghat, once a vital access point, is now  
neglected and deteriorating. Access to the heritage structure is further constrained by a narrow, congested road,  
which serves as the only route leading toward Kolakopa House. This passageway, frequently used by  
rickshaws, tempos, and CNG autorickshaws, also acts as a shortcut to neighboring communities. Consequently,  
it poses difficulties for pedestrians and creates an unsafe, chaotic environment. The area suffers from exposed  
electrical wiring, inadequate stormwater drainage, and widespread littering, further worsening living  
conditions. At the rear of the property lies an old well, which once served as a critical water source. Today, it  
no longer holds water, symbolizing the decline of the entire system. The overall structure stands in a perilous  
state, its collapse imminent unless urgent restoration and conservation efforts are undertaken (Rahman &  
Hossain, 2020).  
6.  
Elite Hindu Merchants’& Zamindar Houses: Kolakopa was once a prosperous settlement of elite  
Hindu merchants and zamindars, distinguished by rows of elegant two-storied houses built in British colonial  
and IndoEuropean architectural styles. Though not grand in scale, these residences reflected refined taste, with  
columned verandahs, arched openings, and symmetrical façades. Over time, neglect and unplanned  
modifications have obscured many of their original features, making the initial layout and typology difficult to  
trace. Despite this decay, several buildings still preserve fragments of their early design. Two principal types  
dominate the area’sbuilt form: the courtyard-style house, centered on open inner yards, and the bungalow-style  
house, marked by wide verandahs and sloping roofs.  
Figure Shows: Ground Floor Plan & 1st Floor Plan, Elevation, Section and Real View of the Heritage Houses  
such as Kokil Peari House, Judge House, Adnan Palace House and Khelaram Data Temple.  
Single Monolithic House: A single monolithic house in Betila refers to a standalone structure that is typically  
compact and unified in design. These houses are characterized by being self-contained, often without distinct  
divisions or courtyards like the bungalow or courtyard-type houses. The design focuses on a singular, cohesive  
building structure rather than multiple components or spaces. These houses may consist of one story, and they  
typically have simple, functional layouts suited to the needs of the inhabitants, without complex room  
Page 2534  
organization or external features. Single story buildings. Much more ornamented and fragmented. Building  
shows arts, aesthetics and appeals.  
6.2  
Courtyard Type House: The houses in Kashba feature two courtyards: the outer courtyard is used for  
public activities, while the inner courtyard is dedicated to private activities. Some of the buildings in the area  
follow this design. Based on the traces of previous foundation locations, it is assumed that other buildings also  
originally had two courtyards.  
6.3  
Bungalow Type House: Bungalow-type houses in Betila are characterized by having no courtyard.  
These are typically one or two-story buildings, featuring yards either in the front or back. There is no  
uniformity in the organization of the rooms across different buildings, offering a variety of layouts.  
7.  
Spatial Organizations: The buildings in Kashba are organized around courtyards that separate public,  
semipublic, and private spaces. The front courtyard contains public functions like guest rooms and temples,  
and is used for cultural activities. The private courtyard, accessed through a passage, holds bedrooms and  
private areas. Colonnaded walkways surround the courtyards, and backyards include kitchen gardens and  
restrooms. Each house has two service entries, and shared ponds are available for the community. A canal  
encircles the settlement, serving both as a service route and a security moat.  
Figure Shows: Land-Use Map of Kolakopa Heritage Houses  
8.  
Architectural Elements: The structures of Kolakopa are mainly British colonial architecture. Their  
structure shows the influence of European Renaissance and Victorian styles. Besides, they are built by local  
craftsmen, so they also have a combination of Mughal and Bengali indigenous architectural features. As a  
result, a “EuroBangla hybrid style” was developed. These were intended to maintain the building's sustainable  
strength, control temperature, and enhance aesthetic beauty. They reveal how local artisans reinterpreted  
foreign design principles to accommodate regional climate, materials, and lifestyles, creating a distinctive  
hybrid style that remains visually and historically significant (Metcalf, 1989). Building Materials include,  
Terracotta bricks, red bricks and Jeffrey bricks; Lime-surki and Limestone; wooden beams and Arches; Cast  
Iron and Corrugated Sheets; Chinni Tikri (pieces of porcelain glassware), corrugated tin sheets and stones  
(White stone, Black jhama stone, Pebbles) etc. Apart from these, other materials used are - surki, jaggery and  
eggshells, laterite stone, iron clamps and anchors, terracotta and wood carvings, coloured glass and European  
stained glass, plaster of Paris (POP) and lime plaster, ceramic tiles and marble pieces, metal elements (bronze  
and copper) and paints and coatings.  
Page 2535  
Table Shows: Building Materials Used in the Colonial Architecture of Kolakopa  
No. Material Name  
Area of Use  
Features and Purpose  
Walls, pillars, arches  
Durable; helps in heat control; Jafri bricks  
allow light and air circulation  
1
2
3
Burnt Clay Bricks, Red  
Bricks, and Jafri Bricks  
Foundation,  
bonding, plaster  
wall Acts as a natural cement; keeps interior  
cool; water-resistant  
LimeSurki and Limestone  
Roof, plaster, floor  
Strengthens the structure; provides  
waterproof layer on the roof  
Surki (Brick Dust)  
No. Material Name  
Area of Use  
Features and Purpose  
Mixed with limesurki Works as natural adhesive; increases  
structural durability  
Roof, verandah, arches, Provides stability; used for carvings and  
4
5
Organic Binders (Molasses,  
Eggshell, Oil, etc.)  
Wooden Beams, Doors, and  
Windows  
windows  
ornamentation  
Windows, verandahs,  
stairs, railings  
Enhances both strength and aesthetic  
beauty  
6
7
8
9
Cast Iron  
Roof  
Rainproof, lightweight, easy to maintain  
Corrugated Iron Sheets / Tin  
Sheets  
Wall decoration  
Adds ornamental sparkle and color  
reflection  
Chinni Tikri (Broken China  
or Porcelain Pieces)  
Foundation,  
floor  
ghats, Increases load-bearing capacity and adds  
visual elegance  
Stones (White, Black Jhama,  
Pebble Stones)  
Foundation and stairs  
Strong and durable in humid areas;  
prevents erosion  
10 Laterite Stone  
Wall and pillar joints  
Maintains structural balance and prevents  
separation  
11 Iron Clamps and Anchors  
Decoration, windows, Reflects local craftsmanship and cultural  
12 Terracotta  
Panels  
and  
roof edges  
identity  
Wooden Carvings  
Doors and windows  
(Colored  
Diffuses sunlight to create colorful interior  
illumination  
13 Stained  
Glass)  
Glass  
Ceiling,  
cornices, Creates smooth and artistic patterns  
14 Plaster of Paris (POP)  
column decorations  
Floors and staircases  
Keeps interior cool and enhances visual  
appeal  
15 Ceramic Tiles and Marble  
Pieces  
Door handles, hinges, Durable; symbol of elegance and  
(Brass,  
16 Metal  
Elements  
locks  
affluence  
Bronze, Copper)  
Walls and ceiling  
Regulates temperature; prevents moisture  
absorption  
17 Lime Paint and Natural  
Pigments  
Page 2536  
In plan and proportion, the buildings of Kolakopa display an impressive sense of order. Most of them follow a  
rectangular or U-shaped layout centered on a spacious inner courtyard. This courtyard, a key feature of Bengali  
domestic architecture, functioned as the heart of the householdensuring ventilation, providing light, and  
organizing family life around a shared open space. The arrangement demonstrates a dialogue between the  
symmetrical order of European planning and the climatic logic of vernacular Bengal (Hasan, 2008). Around  
the courtyard were placed the living quarters, kitchens, guest rooms, and prayer spaces, all oriented toward  
crossventilation and natural illumination.  
The entrances of these structures introduce a ceremonial quality to the buildings. Semi-circular or horse shoe  
shaped arches mark the thresholds, often framed by pairs of Corinthian or Ionic columns. The columns, with  
their fluted shafts and decorative capitals, express the elegance of classical architecture while simultaneously  
serving practical structural functions. Their repetition along extended verandahs forms colonnaded façades that  
evoke the dignity of Greco-Roman porticos. This rhythm of arches and pillars transforms the building front  
into a sculptural composition that merges European proportion with local craftsmanship (Ahmed, 1984).  
The roof forms of Kolakopa’s architecture reveal both aesthetic sensibility and environmental adaptation.  
Many buildings feature gently sloping tiled roofs or corrugated iron sheets that allow quick drainage of  
monsoon rain, while others possess domed centers that enhance ventilation and spatial prominence. The roofs  
are edged with carved cornices adorned with floral motifs and geometric bands. The builders used limesurki  
mortar as a bonding agent, which not only strengthened the walls but also maintained cooler interior  
temperatures during the summer months. The combination of design and material choice shows how  
architecture here was as much about comfort and climate as about visual beauty (Alam, 2017).  
The decorative program of these buildings deserves special attention. Ornamentation was employed with  
sensitivity and precision, turning façades and interior spaces into canvases of cultural expression. Wooden  
doors and windows bear delicate carvings of vines, flowers, and latticework, while cast-iron railings display  
intricate Victorian scrolls and rosettes. Colored and stained-glass panes diffuse daylight into vibrant shades,  
bathing interiors in an atmospheric glow. In this layering of decorative vocabulary, European motifs were  
transformed through local artistic idioms, producing an architectural language that was both familiar and novel  
(Tillotson, 1998).  
Figure Shows: Building Fenostration Ornamentation & It’s Details.  
Page 2537  
Materially, Kolakopa’s architecture represents a balance between durability and artistry. Builders relied on  
burnt clay bricks, limesurki mortar, timber beams, and wrought ironmaterials readily available yet capable  
of high craftsmanship. The reddish hue of exposed brickwork evokes warmth and solidity, while lime-washed  
walls in soft whites or yellows offer brightness and relief. Porcelain fragments, terracotta plaques, and marble  
chips were embedded into wall surfaces, creating a textured visual experience. Such materials, chosen with  
sensitivity to humidity and temperature, embody a sophisticated understanding of tropical sustainability long  
before the term entered modern architectural theory (Fraser-Lu, 1994). Kolakopa’s built environment also  
harmonizes architecture with nature. Many mansions were set within landscaped gardens featuring flowering  
plants, fruit trees, and ponds. Stone-paved walkways led from the entrance gate to the main courtyard,  
symbolically bridging the exterior and interior worlds. Ghats built along the ponds or rivers provided both  
practical access to water and spiritual retreat. This integration of built and natural elements reveals a distinctly  
Bengali aesthetica recognition that architecture must coexist with landscape and climate (Islam &  
Chowdhury, 2019).  
Beyond residences, Kolakopa preserves temples, ghats, schools, and old clubhouses that enrich its architectural  
diversity. The temples exhibit domed sanctums and ornamental bell towers, while colonial schools and civic  
clubs adopt simplified European plans with long verandahs and large windows for light and air. Brick bridges,  
bathing steps, and ghats constructed with limesurki bonding continue to demonstrate the technical mastery of  
local masons. These varied structures together form a cultural mosaic, illustrating how faith, education, and  
social life were all expressed architecturally within a single regional idiom. The European presence in  
Kolakopa is unmistakable yet filtered through local interpretation. Neoclassical symmetry, Victorian ironwork,  
and IndoSaracenic eclecticism coexist with vernacular materials and spatial patterns. The architecture stands as  
evidence of creative translation rather than imitation. Builders and patrons absorbed the formal language of  
empire but reshaped it according to local needs, giving rise to an Indo-European hybrid identity that was both  
colonial and distinctly Bengali (Metcalf & Metcalf, 2012).  
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of Kolakopa’s architecture lies in its environmental intelligence. The thick  
brick walls and high ceilings allow interior cooling, while wide verandahs and south-facing openings promote  
cross-ventilation. Limesurki plaster resists dampness during the monsoon season, and courtyards act as  
thermal buffers. Each design decision reflects empirical wisdom accumulated through generations of builders  
who understood the rhythm of the local climate (Ahmed, 1994). Today, the surviving buildings of Kolakopa  
are not merely relics of a vanished era; they are tangible witnesses of an architectural synthesis that bridges  
continents and centuries. Crafted from brick, lime, wood, and iron, these structures exemplify how global ideas  
can take root in local soil. They speak of adaptation rather than dominance, negotiation rather than imitation.  
The architecture of Kolakopa, therefore, stands as a living archive of colonial modernity interpreted through a  
Bengali lensan enduring testament to the creativity and resilience of local builders who transformed imperial  
forms into regional identity.  
Documentation. 01: Kokil Piari Zamindar House:  
Page 2538  
Figure Shows: Kokil Piari House at Kolakopa.  
Nestled on the serene banks of the Ichamati River in Kolakopa, Nawabganj (Dhaka), the Kokil Peari Zamindar  
Bari, also known as Kokil Peari Palace or Braj Niketan, stands as a silent witness to the grandeur of Bengal’s  
zamindari era. Built in the early 19th century by Brojen Kumar Roy, popularly known as Sundarshan Roy, the  
mansion showcases an exquisite fusion of local craftsmanship and European architectural influences.  
Constructed using brick, surki, and iron rods, its symmetrical façade, ornate balconies, and arched verandas  
reflect both strength and sophistication. Surrounded by lush gardens and age-old trees, the palace once served  
as a luxurious residence for the illustrious Roy family. Over time, the property changed hands first acquired by  
an oil merchant and later by a judge leading local to affectionately call it “Telibari” and “Judge Bari.” Today,  
though weathered by time, Kokil Peari Zamindar Bari remains a monument to Bengal’s aristocratic past,  
cherished by historians, architects, and travelers alike. It continues to evoke the charm and cultural vibrancy of  
an era long gone where art, heritage, and nobility coexisted in perfect harmony.  
Architectural Documentation:  
Figure Shows: South Elevation of Kokil Peari House at Kolakopa, Nababganj, Dhaka.  
01.  
External Architectural Features: The exterior of Adnan Palace exhibits a pronounced influence of the  
European Classical Revival style, a popular architectural language among Bengal’s aristocracy during the  
colonial period. The two-storied building presents a colonnaded façade, dominated by tall, evenly spaced  
Corinthian or Ionic columns with intricately carved capitals adorned with acanthus leaf motifs. A triangular  
pediment, reminiscent of Greek and Roman temple design, crowns the main entrance, imparting a monumental  
sense of grandeur. The ground floor is punctuated by large arched doorways and windows, while the upper  
Page 2539  
floor features balconied windows that promote natural ventilation an adaptation well-suited to Bengal’s  
tropical climate. The balustrades and balcony railings, likely cast in wrought or cast iron, reflect the industrial  
craftsmanship of the late colonial period. The palace opens onto a formal courtyard garden, historically  
ornamented with flowering plants, stone pathways, and possibly a central fountain or statue-topped basin a  
symbol of luxury and refinement. The landscaping reflects the zamindari ideal of merging architecture with  
leisure, aesthetics, and social display.  
02.  
Interior Layout and Spatial Organization: The interior design of Adnan Palace embodies a synthesis  
of opulence and practicality characteristic of zamindari residences. There are entrance and grand hall. Upon  
entry, visitors are greeted by an expansive central hall an auditorium-like space used historically for receptions,  
musical performances, and social assemblies. The ceiling, soaring approximately 1820 feet, features a central  
chandelier suspended from decorative plasterwork, surrounded by stucco ornamentation on the walls. The  
residence follows a symmetrical floor plan, with rooms arranged along both sides of a central corridor. These  
include bedrooms, guest chambers, prayer rooms, and office spaces, organized around an open-air courtyard to  
maximize natural illumination and cross-ventilation. Construction materials include brick masonry with lime-  
surki mortar, sal wood joinery, mosaic or terrazzo flooring, and iron-beam-supported ceilings. Select doorways  
likely featured stained glass panels, reflecting both aesthetic sensibility and the influence of European  
decorative traditions.  
03.  
Artistic Influence and Stylistic Interpretation: Three major stylistic influences converge in the  
design of Adnan Palace: Neoclassical Aesthetic: Evident in its columns, pediments, and symmetry, the building  
reflects Renaissance ideals of order and proportion. Indo-Islamic and Vernacular Elements: The arched  
doorways, balconies, and internal courtyard align with climatic needs and traditional South Asian spatial  
sensibilities. Colonial Hybridization: The overall design demonstrates the adaptive architectural identity of  
Bengal’s landed elite, who appropriated European styles as symbols of prestige and modernity while retaining  
local practicality. This hybrid character situates Adnan Palace within the broader architectural continuum of  
Bengal’s colonial cultural synthesis, illustrating how architecture functioned as both an expression of wealth  
and a medium of identity negotiation.  
04.  
Modern Transformation and Preservation: In recent years, Adnan Palace has undergone  
considerable renovation to serve as Palace Park, a community-oriented recreational venue. Additions such as  
modern lighting, benches, paved walkways, and repainted surfaces have altered some of its historic fabric.  
However, the colonnaded façade, pediment, and proportional symmetry continue to convey the original  
zamindari elegance The repurposing of the building has enhanced public accessibility, yet its heritage  
preservation remains insufficiently institutionalized. Without systematic documentation, conservation  
planning, and material restoration, the risk of architectural dilution persists. Nonetheless, the palace’s adaptive  
reuse demonstrates how historical structures can retain relevance through functional transformation, bridging  
the aesthetic of the past with the social needs of the present.  
Documentation. 02: Judge House: The Judge House (locally known as Judge Bari) is a historic manor  
situated in Nawabganj Upazila of the Dhaka District. Originally constructed over a century ago, this  
architectural relic reflects the grandeur of Bengal’s zamindari era. The mansion was first established by Brojen  
Roy, also known as Sudarshan Roy, a prominent zamindar (landlord) of the region. He named the residence  
Brojo Niketan, a title symbolizing prestige and refinement. The structure showcases the colonial architectural  
influence common among affluent Bengali estates of the 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1984, the estate was  
acquired by a judge, leading to its modern name Judge House. Since then, it has been a well-known  
landmark among locals, blending legal history with cultural heritage. Today, the property is listed as vested  
property under the Bangladesh government and recognized as a protected heritage site. It has become a popular  
destination for photography, picnics, and historical tours, attracting visitors intrigued by its aged elegance and  
tranquil surroundings.  
Page 2540  
Figure Shows: Judge House;  
Architectural Documentation of Judge House  
01. External Architectural Features: The Judge House stands as a testament to the hybrid colonial–  
Bengali architectural style of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The building’s façade displays symmetry,  
classical proportions, and ornamental detailing that reflect the influence of European neoclassical  
designblended with local craftsmanship. Structure and Materials: Constructed primarily from brick masonry  
with lime plaster finishing, the structure emphasizes durability and visual harmony. The walls are thick,  
providing natural insulation against the tropical climate. The roof is a sloping pitched type, typical of colonial-  
era residences in Bengal to allow rainwater drainage. The arched windows and doorways, framed with stucco  
moldings, add rhythm and grandeur to the elevation. The front façade features a spacious veranda supported by  
Tuscan-style columns, offering both aesthetic appeal and functional shade. This element served as a semi-  
public space for visitors a hallmark of zamindar residences. The mansion is surrounded by lush greenery and  
open courtyards, with an approach path that once led through a formal garden. The placement of the building  
on slightly raised ground gives it prominence and dignity within the estate.  
02.  
Interior Layout and Spatial Organization: The interior of Judge House reveals a well-considered  
spatial hierarchy that reflects both functional zoning and social order typical of elite residences of its time. The  
main entrance opens into a large central hall, which once functioned as a reception and meeting area for guests  
and tenants. High ceilings and ventilated clerestory windows allow ample daylight and cross-ventilation. The  
layout divides the structure into public front spaces (for guests and administrative affairs) and private rear  
quarters (for family use). Side wings may have accommodated servants’ rooms, storage areas, and kitchens  
detached or semidetached for safety. A grand staircase, possibly made of polished wood or cast iron, connects  
the floors. Internal corridors link rooms while maintaining privacya reflection of colonial domestic planning.  
The interior features ornate plaster ceilings, wooden panel doors, and occasionally floral floor tiles. Even in its  
weathered state, traces of intricate craftsmanship remain visible.  
03.  
Artistic Influence and Stylistic Interpretation: The Judge House embodies a fusion of European  
neoclassical style and Bengali vernacular traditions. That depends on colonial influence. The use of columns,  
pediments, and symmetrical proportions shows the impact of British neoclassical architecture prevalent during  
the late colonial period. These features projected authority and refinement qualities desired by local elites  
emulating colonial tastes. Elements like wide verandas, high plinths, and open courtyards adapt the Western  
style to the local climate and social lifestyle. The open circulation allows air flow, vital for tropical comfort.  
Page 2541  
Decorative motifs include floral plaster reliefs, ornamental cornices, and arched niches a blend of Western  
ornamentation with South Asian aesthetics. The artistic restraint of the exterior contrasts with the intimacy and  
color of interior ornamentation.  
04.  
Modern Transformation and Preservation: Since its acquisition by a judge in 1984, the building has  
undergone limited but notable transformation. Some rooms have been repurposed for administrative or  
residential use, but much of the structure retains its original layout. Temporary repairs with modern cement  
plaster and paint are visible in several sections. Exposure to monsoon humidity, vegetation growth, and neglect  
have caused surface decay, plaster peeling, and structural cracks. Lack of systematic conservation threatens the  
building’s long-term stability. Currently listed as vested property under the Bangladesh government, the Judge  
House is recognized as a protected heritage site. This designation offers potential for conservation funding and  
community-based heritage tourism. Restoration could transform the Judge House into a local heritage museum  
or cultural center, highlighting the evolution of zamindar architecture and early colonial urbanization. Such  
initiatives would preserve both its material integrity and its historical memory.  
Figure Shows: South Elevation of Judge House at Kolakopa, Nababganj, Dhaka.  
Documentation. 03: Adnan Palace: Adnan Palace - once known as the residence of Zamindar Radhanath  
Saha, a wealthy and influential businessman stands as a significant reminder of Bengal’s aristocratic past. It is  
believed that the house originally belonged to the son of Zamindar Jadunath Saha of Bhagyakul, although the  
exact relationship between Radhanath Saha and Jadunath Saha (whether father and son or otherwise) remains  
uncertain. Until about a decade ago, descendants of the zamindar family continued to live in the mansion.  
Later, they sold the property to Shamsul Alam Pokhraj, a local stone merchant, who renamed it “Adnan  
Palace” after his son. At present, the site serves as a public leisure area known as Palace Park.Despite  
renovations and repurposing, the building’s architectural style retains the essence of British colonial and  
zamindari-era design, closely resembling other grand estates and palaces of Bengal such as Sonakanda and  
Murapara Palace.Thus, Adnan Palace not only reflects the historical grandeur of Bengal’s feudal elite but also  
stands as a bridge between past aristocracy and modern adaptation.  
Figure Shows: Real observation of “Adnan Palace”, another named “Houses of Radhanath Shah”, It’s  
features.  
Page 2542  
Architectural Documentation:  
1. External Architectural Features: The architecture of Adanan Palace shows a strong influence of the  
European Classical Revival style, which was prevalent in the late 19th and early 20th-century zamindar  
(landlord) mansions. This building shows colonnaded façade. At the main entrance, there is a row of tall,  
evenly spaced columns that give the façade a sense of grandeur and royalty. The capitals of these columns  
display Corinthian or Ionic designs, intricately carved with leaf motifs. Above them sits a triangular pediment,  
modeled after Greek-Roman temples, enhancing the palace’s majestic appearance. The building is two-storied,  
with high ceilings on both floors. The ground floor features large arched doorways and windows, while the  
upper floor has a series of balconied windows, allowing ample light and air circulation suitable for warm  
climates. The balcony railings likely used cast iron designs, a common feature in British colonial architecture.  
In front of the palace lies a spacious courtyard or garden. At its center may stand a fountain or statue-topped  
fountain, symbolizing the refined elegance of classic palaces. Surrounding it are flower gardens, walking  
paths, and rows of trees, representing the comfort and leisure of aristocratic life.  
Figure Shows: South Elevation of Adnan Palace at Kolakopa, Nababganj, Dhaka.  
2.  
Interior Layout and Design: The interior design combines luxury with functionality. There is a grand  
hall inside the building. Immediately after the main entrance stands a large auditorium-like hall, used for  
receptions, musical gatherings, and social events. The ceiling rises about 1820 feet, with a chandelier hanging  
from above, while the walls are decorated with stucco or plaster ornamentation. Rooms are aligned on both  
sides, connected by corridors, with an open courtyard in the middle to allow natural light and air. There were  
bedrooms, guest rooms, prayer spaces, and business or office rooms, each planned for specific purposes.  
Traditional materials such as lime-surki (mortar) and brick were used, with mosaic or terrazzo floors, sal wood  
doors, and iron beam ceilings. Some decorative doors may have featured stained glass, adding to the interior  
beauty.  
3.  
Artistic Influence and Aesthetic: Three distinct stylistic influences are evident in Adanan Palace’s  
architecture: Neoclassical design, Indo-islamic and Vernacular design and colonial blending. The columns,  
cornices, pediments, and symmetrical balance all reflect Renaissance-inspired European design. The arched  
windows and doors, open balconies, and high ceilings suit the local climate blending Western aesthetics with  
Eastern practicality. During British rule, Bengal’s elite class often adopted European architecture to display  
their social status. Adanan Palace stands as a symbol of that heritage.  
4.  
Modern Transformation and Preservation: Today, the palace is repurposed as “Palace Park,” and  
some of its original features have been modified. The walls and columns have been repainted, with new  
lighting, benches, and walkways added for public use. Despite these changes, the original grandeur especially  
the colonnaded façade and pediment continue to impress visitors. The conversion into a park has made its  
historical and aesthetic significance accessible to the public, though better preservation and maintenance are  
still needed.  
Page 2543  
Documentation. 04: Khelaram Data Temple: The Khelaram Data Temple, situated in Nawabganj near  
Dhaka, stands as a timeless symbol of Bengal’s heritage, blending history, architecture, and legend into one  
captivating story. This three-storied brick temple, adorned with elegant carvings and traditional motifs, has no  
recorded date of origin. Archaeologists suggest that the structure was built between the late 19th and early 20th  
centuries, showcasing the refined craftsmanship of that era. According to enduring local legends, Khelaram  
was a generous figureoften likened to Robin Hood who seized wealth from the rich to help the poor. The title  
“Data,” meaning “the benevolent one,” reflects his compassionate nature. Folklore further claims that one  
mysterious night, the grand temple miraculously emerged from beneath the earth. Another tale speaks of a  
hidden underground tunnel linking his house to the Ichamati River, said to be used for transporting treasures.  
Khelaram’s story ends in tragedy and mystery: in an attempt to save his mother from drowning, he leapt into a  
nearby pond and was never seen again. Today, the Khelaram Data Temple remains not merely a place of  
worship but a living testament to courage, faith, and folklore preserving the echoes of a man who became a  
legend.  
Figure Shows: Construction Part of the Khelaram Data Temple  
Architectural Documentation of Khelaram Data Temple  
1. External Architectural Features: The Khelaram Data Temple is a three-storied brick structure showcasing  
the classical traits of late 19th-century Bengal temple architecture. The exterior walls are crafted with burnt red  
bricks and adorned with ornamental terracotta patterns, reflecting both strength and elegance. The temple  
stands on a raised plinth, symbolizing sanctity and separation from the mundane world. Its arched entrances  
and curved cornices (chala style) mirror the aesthetic essence of traditional Hindu temples in Bengal. The  
symmetry of its facade and the intricate geometric carvings give the structure a majestic appearance, visible  
from a distance.  
Page 2544  
Figure Shows: Existing (Collupsed) & Present (after Restoration and Renovation) view of Khelaram  
Data Temple, Source: Department of Archaeology (DOA);  
Interior Layout and Design: Inside, the temple follows a vertical spatial arrangement, with each floor serving  
a distinct spiritual or functional purpose. The ground floor typically houses the main deity (Bigrha), while the  
upper levels might have been used for ritual observation or offering space. The interior walls are comparatively  
simple, focusing attention on the sanctum. Narrow stairways connect the levels, emphasizing vertical  
devotiona symbolic link between the earthly and the divine. The use of natural ventilation and small arched  
windows ensures soft light and airflow throughout the structure.  
Artistic Influence and Aesthetic: Artistically, the temple reflects a synthesis of Bengal terracotta art and  
European neoclassical inspiration, seen during the colonial period. Floral motifs, mythological figures, and  
abstract geometric forms decorate parts of the structure. The visual harmony of symmetry, proportion, and  
rhythm gives the temple its aesthetic depth. Despite its religious purpose, the temple stands as an architectural  
artwork, representing the craftsmanship and devotion of local artisans who mastered blending local tradition  
with evolving artistic sensibilities.  
Page 2545  
Figure Shows: Internal Ornamentation (Floral Patterns) and Aesthetics of Khelaram Data Temple.  
Source- Save the Heritage of Bangladesh (Pages)  
4. Modern Transformation and Preservation: Over time, the temple has experienced weathering, erosion,  
and partial structural decay. Local communities continue to maintain it informally, using traditional materials  
to preserve its authenticity. However, without formal restoration by the Department of Archaeology, parts of  
the structure remain vulnerable. Recently, efforts by residents and heritage enthusiasts have focused on raising  
awareness and preventing modern alterations that could harm its original character. The temple now serves as  
both a religious and cultural landmark, reminding visitors of Bengal’s enduring architectural legacy.  
RECOMMENDATIONS:  
The historic settlement of Kolakopa is increasingly vulnerable to the pressures of modern urban expansion,  
climatic uncertainty, and economic instability. These factors collectively threaten its distinctive architectural  
and cultural character. To address this, immediate and well-structured conservation efforts are imperative. The  
initial step toward any sustainable preservation plan must involve systematic documentation of the area’s  
existing architectural features, spatial configuration, and environmental context, establishing a factual basis for  
future intervention (Ikiz Kaya, Pintossi, & Koot, 2024). Conventional, government-led conservation programs  
often result in a form of “static preservation,” where the organic vitality of a heritage site becomes frozen in  
time, creating long-term management challenges. Therefore, any conservation initiative for Kolakopa must  
adopt a people-centered approach, integrating the social dynamics, cultural practices, and daily needs of its  
inhabitants (Shahi et al., 2020; Kaya et al., 2024). To achieve lasting success, policy frameworks should  
encourage collaboration between public institutions, private stakeholders, and local communities, fostering  
shared stewardship of the heritage environment (Jokilehto, 2023). Strategies such as adaptive reuse of  
historical structures, community-led tourism initiatives, and context-sensitive architectural interventions,  
guided by heritage specialists, can effectively revitalize the settlement (Smith & Watson, 2025). Through such  
an integrated and participatory model, Kolakopa’s historic fabric can be preserved not as a relic of the past, but  
as a living, evolving cultural landscape balancing authenticity with contemporary relevance and ensuring  
resilience for generations to come.  
CONCLUSION:  
The historic dwelling architecture and spatial organization of Kolakopa, Nawabganj (Dhaka), reveal its  
outstanding heritage value and make it a strong candidate for systematic conservation. The linear arrangement  
of colonial-era houses, coupled with the area’s strategic geographical setting, establishes Kolakopa as a site of  
remarkable cultural, historical, and architectural importance. The study’s documentation and analysis capture  
the social, political, economic, and environmental conditions that once shaped Kolakopa, serving as a valuable  
reflection of Bengal’s vibrant historical landscape. Beyond identifying its architectural merit, this research  
emphasizes the urgency of reassessing and safeguarding this living heritage before it fades  
further.Comprehensive conservation and adaptive restoration can reinvigorate this declining settlement,  
preserving Kolakopa’s distinctive architectural language and cultural identity for future generations.The  
findings of this research lay the groundwork for informed conservation policies and cultivate a deeper  
understanding of Kolakopa’s enduring role within the broader continuum of Bengal’s built heritage.  
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:  
This paper originates from the author’s undergraduate Urban Project, completed as part of the Bachelor of  
Architecture (B. Arch) program at Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh, in March 2024. The  
project was conducted under the supervision of Professor Latifa Sultana, Department of Architecture,  
Southeast University (SEU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.  
Page 2546  
REFERENCES  
1. Ahmed, N. (1984). Discover the Old Dhaka: A study of urban transformation. University Press  
Limited.  
2. Chowdhury, S. (2015). Heritage ownership patterns and the urban middle class in Bangladesh.  
Journal of South Asian Studies, 12(2), 4559.  
3. Hasan, M. (2020). Urban heritage in peril: The challenge of preserving old residential structures in  
Bangladesh. Bangladesh Architectural Review, 8(1), 2339.  
4. Islam, M. R. (2003). Colonial architecture and identity in Bengal. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of  
Bangladesh.  
5. Islam, S., & Hossain, T. (2017). Socio-economic impacts on heritage conservation in urban  
Bangladesh. Journal of Built Environment, 5(2), 3348.  
6. Rahman, A. (2018). Urban transformation and the disappearance of heritage neighborhoods. Journal  
of  
7. Urban Development Studies, 9(3), 6172.  
8. Rahman, K., & Karim, R. (2019). The politics of property and post-partition urban heritage in South  
Asia. South Asian Heritage Review, 6(1), 101120.  
9. Rahman, T., & Hossain, M. (2020). Heritage under threat: Urban neglect and environmental decay in  
historical settlements of Bangladesh. Journal of Heritage Conservation and Urban Studies, 11(2), 55–  
68. Ahmed, N. (1984). Discover the monuments of Bangladesh. University Press Limited.  
10. Ahmed, N. (1994). Architectural heritage of Bangladesh: Muslim period. Asiatic Society of  
Bangladesh.  
11. Alam, M. S. (2017). Colonial encounters in Bengal architecture: European influence and local  
adaptation. Journal of South Asian Architecture, 9(2), 4560.  
12. Fraser-Lu, S. (1994). Burmese crafts: Past and present. Oxford University Press.  
13. Hasan, S. (2008). Colonial architecture in Bengal: Identity, hybridization and continuity. Bangladesh  
National Museum Press.  
14. Islam, M., & Chowdhury, N. (2019). Ecological vernacular: Water, climate, and architecture in  
Bengal. Journal of Vernacular Architecture, 24(3), 5772.  
15. Metcalf, T. R. (1989). An imperial vision: Indian architecture and Britain’s Raj. University of  
California Press.  
16. Metcalf, B. D., & Metcalf, T. R. (2012). A concise history of modern India (3rd ed.). Cambridge  
University Press.  
17. Tillotson, G. (1998). The tradition of Indian architecture: Continuity, controversy and change since  
1850. Yale University Press.  
18. Ikiz Kaya, D., Pintossi, N., & Koot, C. A. M. (2024). Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage: Barrier  
Assessment and Policy-Related Recommendations. In Heritage Buildings & Urban Development  
19. Jokilehto, J. (2023). Conservation Principles in Heritage Architecture: Social and Community-Based  
Approaches. Heritage & Society, 16(2), 155-172.  
20. Shahi, H., Smith, A., & Ahmed, F. (2020). Documentation Techniques for Living Heritage:  
Framework and Best Practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(10), 987-1002.  
21. Smith, R., & Watson, L. (2025). Strategies for Architectural Conservation and Adaptive Reuse.  
Architecture Journal, 7(1), 32-45.  
Page 2547