Exploring Innovative Frontiers: Digital Public Infrastructure and  
Multimodal Connectivity as Catalysts for MSME Supply Chain  
Transformation in India  
Tushar Dhiman1 & Pankaj Madan2  
1Research Scholar & Guest Faculty, Faculty of Management Studies, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be  
University) Haridwar, Uttarakhand  
2Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University) Haridwar,  
Uttarakhand  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 26 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
India’s industrial transformation is being rapidly reshaped by the rise of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI),  
which integrates platforms such as ONDC, OCEN, UPI, and Gati Shakti to create transparent, inclusive, and  
technology-driven ecosystems. This paper critically examines how DPI strengthens supply chain dynamics for  
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), particularly women and specially-abled entrepreneurs, by  
addressing challenges of digital access, financing, and multimodal connectivity. The research highlights that  
while India has made significant progress in building interoperable platforms, the adoption and integration of  
these systems across fragmented MSME clusters remain uneven. By synthesizing insights from existing  
literature and policy reports, the paper underscores the transformative potential of ONDC in democratizing e-  
commerce, OCEN in improving credit access, and Gati Shakti in enhancing logistics efficiency. The findings  
suggest that DPI does not function merely as a set of technological tools but as an institutional framework that  
redefines market entry, competitiveness, and resilience. However, barriers such as limited digital literacy,  
infrastructural gaps in rural areas, and concerns over data security continue to constrain full-scale adoption. The  
study also emphasizes the need for capacity building, robust governance frameworks, and collaborative  
approaches involving policymakers, private players, and grassroots stakeholders to ensure that MSMEs can  
leverage DPI effectively. Ultimately, the paper positions DPI as a catalyst for inclusive and sustainable industrial  
growth in India, capable of bridging structural divides while fostering innovation and competitiveness. The  
discussion aligns with the broader vision of Viksit Bharat 2047, underscoring how DPI-led supply chain  
transformation can accelerate India’s transition into a global economic hub.  
Keywords: Digital Public Infrastructure, MSMEs, Supply Chain Transformation, ONDC, Industrial Growth.  
INTRODUCTION  
India stands at an inflection point in its economic and technological trajectory: rapid digitalisation is converging  
with ambitious infrastructure upgrades to create new opportunities for industrial transformation and inclusive  
growth. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) long recognized as the backbone of India’s  
manufacturing, employment and export performance are central to this transition. Yet many MSMEs remain  
constrained by fragmented logistics, limited market access, and uneven digital readiness. Emerging paradigms  
such as Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and multimodal connectivity promise to address these constraints by  
weaving an interoperable layer of digital services over increasingly integrated physical transport networks,  
thereby enabling MSMEs to scale, diversify, and participate more fully in domestic and global value chains  
(Khimani & Singhal, 2024; Raghavan, Jain, & Varma, 2019). Digital Public Infrastructure embodied by  
foundational platforms, open protocols, and interoperable public goods for payments, identity, data exchange  
and commerce has transformed the shape and speed of market participation in India (Raghavan et al., 2019; Mah  
Sheena K M et al., 2022). Initiatives such as India Stack, Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) and  
related open-architecture efforts illustrate how public digital utilities can level the playing field for small sellers,  
Page 2637  
reduce entry barriers, and create a more competitive digital marketplace (Mah Sheena K M et al., 2022; Vijay  
Kumar & Harshitha, 2023). At the same time, digital tools from cloud-based enterprise resource planning to AI-  
enabled demand forecasting and blockchain-based traceability are redefining supply chain visibility,  
responsiveness and trust (Pratyush Kumar Singh, 2023; Acharya, Cisneros Saldana, & Markus, 2024). The  
literature documents robust gains in MSME productivity and market reach when DPI and enterprise-level digital  
capabilities are present, but it also highlights uneven adoption and capability gaps that limit the full promise of  
digital public goods (Arthi Jone & Dhanalakshmi, 2024; Buteau, n.d.). Parallel to digital advances, India’s  
physical logistics ecosystem is undergoing a shift toward multimodal connectivity the coordinated use of road,  
rail, waterways and ports to optimize cost, time and environmental outcomes. Research on multimodal supply  
chains underscores how technological and organizational innovations in intermodal transfer, freight aggregation,  
and real-time data exchange can reduce transaction and transportation costs while improving reliability  
(Tavasszy, 2018; Cai, Sharkawi, & Taasim, 2024). Such connectivity is particularly consequential for MSMEs,  
which typically lack the bargaining power and scale enjoyed by large firms; access to optimized multimodal  
corridors can significantly lower inventory and distribution costs and enable MSMEs to access new markets with  
predictable lead times (Menon & Shah, 2020; Talluri & Ananthamurthy, 2022). Yet the literature also cautions  
that physical integration alone is insufficient: multimodality must be paired with interoperable information flows  
and governance frameworks to realize end-to-end efficiency gains (Hofman, 2015; Tavasszy, 2018).  
The complementary relationship between DPI and multimodal connectivity is emerging as a critical research  
frontier. Digital platforms can orchestrate multimodal logistics by providing standardized data protocols,  
shipment tracking, marketplace integration and payment settlement effectively knitting together scattered  
transport assets and commercial actors into coordinated digital supply networks (Acharya et al., 2024; Hofman,  
2015). Studies show that such digital-physical integration reduces coordination friction, lowers transaction costs,  
and supports supply chain diversification and resilience (Cai et al., 2024; Yin & Ran, 2022). For MSMEs,  
integrated digital-physical systems mean not only lower operational costs but also improved creditworthiness  
(through digital transaction trails), easier participation in formal procurement, and enhanced resilience to  
disruptions outcomes that align directly with national objectives of equitable growth and the Vision of a Viksit  
Bharat by 2047 (Simran Kaur, 2025; Bright, 2025).  
Despite the promise, empirical and policy literatures identify several persistent barriers. First, infrastructural  
heterogeneity across regions “digital deserts” versus “tech havens” creates uneven competitive landscapes for  
MSMEs, with rural and smaller urban firms lagging in both connectivity and digital skills (Khimani & Singhal,  
2024; Gawali, n.d.). Second, resource constraints (capital, managerial capabilities and digital literacy) impede  
the adoption of sophisticated supply-chain technologies among micro and small enterprises (Khandelwal &  
Priya, 2024; Pandey, 2024). Third, institutional fragmentation and lack of interoperable standards constrain the  
formation of federated data pipelines necessary for seamless multimodal operations (Hofman, 2015; Raghavan  
et al., 2019). Finally, technology adoption without parallel process redesign and capacity building often leads to  
sub-optimal outcomes, as many organizations fail to reengineer their business processes to exploit new digital  
tools (Zika, 2022; Choudhury et al., 2021). These gaps point to a systemic problem: piecemeal interventions  
yield gains for some firms but do not create a broad-based, sustainable transformation of MSME supply chains.  
The literature also highlights the strategic role of policy and public-private collaboration in accelerating inclusive  
digitalisation. Government-led initiatives such as ONDC and the broader India Stack demonstrate the catalytic  
potential of open public goods in stimulating private innovation and bringing small sellers into digital  
marketplaces (Mah Sheena K M et al., 2022; Government initiatives and digital innovation studies). Scholars  
argue for an integrated policy mix that combines infrastructure investment, incentives for digital adoption,  
skilling programs, and regulatory frameworks that encourage interoperability and competition (Buteau; Mah  
Sheena et al., 2023). Moreover, several studies emphasize that resilience and sustainability including green  
supply chain practices should be embedded in the digitalisation agenda to ensure long-term competitiveness and  
ecological stewardship (Zainurrafiqi & Gazali, 2024; Menon & Shah, 2020).  
A clear gap in the existing body of work lies at the intersection of DPI, multimodal connectivity and MSME  
supply chain performance at the regional level especially with respect to integrated frameworks that translate  
national digital public goods into locally relevant logistics solutions. While many studies document the benefits  
of digitalisation or of improved physical connectivity in isolation (Pratyush Kumar Singh, 2023; Tavasszy, 2018),  
Page 2638  
fewer examine how DPI can be intentionally designed to enable multimodal corridor orchestration that directly  
serves MSME clusters, including small manufacturers, Agri-processors and micro-retailers. Likewise, evidence  
is limited on how federated data architectures, open commerce networks and interoperable payment/credit rails  
can be coordinated with modal investments (e.g., rail freight modernization, inland waterways and last-mile road  
upgrades) to produce measurable improvements in cost, lead time and market access for MSMEs (Hofman,  
2015; Cai et al., 2024). This study addresses that gap by interrogating how Digital Public Infrastructure and  
multimodal connectivity together can catalyse supply-chain transformation for MSMEs within the framework  
of India’s Vision for Viksit Bharat 2047. The research asks: (1) What are the mechanisms through which DPI  
lowers transaction and coordination costs across multimodal logistics chains for MSMEs? (2) How can public  
digital goods and open protocols be aligned with regional multimodal investments to maximize MSME  
participation in formal markets? (3) What institutional and capability interventions are necessary to ensure  
equitable outcomes across diverse MSME clusters? Drawing on the literature on digital public goods, supply  
chain digitization, multimodal logistics and MSME policy, this paper proposes an integrated conceptual  
framework and empirically grounded recommendations for policymakers, platform designers and industry  
stakeholders (Khimani & Singhal, 2024; Acharya et al., 2024; Tavasszy, 2018).  
The dual thrust of this introduction is to situate MSME supply-chain challenges within the twin possibilities of  
DPI and multimodal connectivity, and to argue that their deliberate integration rather than isolated deployment  
is essential for driving inclusive industrial transformation. The sections that follow review the empirical and  
conceptual literature in greater depth, develop an integrative analytical framework, and present policy and  
practice recommendations for catalyzing MSME competitiveness in the digital-physical economy that India  
aspires to build by 2047 (Simran Kaur, 2025; Bright, 2025).  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
The discourse on Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), multimodal connectivity, and Micro, Small, and Medium  
Enterprises (MSMEs) is rapidly expanding, reflecting India’s aspiration toward Vision Viksit Bharat 2047.  
Scholars agree that MSMEs form the backbone of the Indian economy, contributing significantly to employment,  
exports, and innovation. However, persistent barriers such as fragmented supply chains, high logistics costs, and  
limited access to formal credit hinder their growth. The literature converges on the argument that DPI and  
multimodal connectivity offer transformative pathways for resolving these challenges by improving efficiency,  
inclusivity, and competitiveness. A growing body of research explores the role of DPI in reshaping MSME  
operations. Khimani and Singhal (2024) highlight how robust digital platforms enhance inclusivity by bridging  
gaps in access to finance, digital tools, and marketplaces. Their findings suggest that foundational digital  
infrastructure such as India Stack and the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) lower transaction costs and expand  
participation for smaller firms. Similarly, Mah Sheena K. M. et al. (2022) examine the Open Network for Digital  
Commerce (ONDC) and show that open protocols reduce entry barriers, enabling MSMEs to connect with  
broader consumer markets. These studies collectively argue that DPI functions as a “public good,” leveling the  
playing field for enterprises of varied scales. At the enterprise level, advanced digital technologies like  
blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) are increasingly integrated into supply  
chains. Singh (2023) emphasizes how blockchain enhances transparency and trust in supply chain transactions,  
while AI and IoT improve demand forecasting and real-time tracking. Acharya, Cisneros Saldana, and Markus  
(2024) develop “SuppliFlow,” a digital platform designed to orchestrate multimodal logistics, underscoring how  
digital interventions enable coordinated, efficient, and sustainable supply chains. These findings resonate with  
Arthi Jone and Dhanalakshmi (2024), who argue that digital adoption boosts MSME productivity and market  
competitiveness, though adoption gaps persist.  
The literature also acknowledges challenges related to uneven digital readiness. Buteau (n.d.) notes that while  
digital technologies empower MSMEs, disparities in digital literacy and resource availability create uneven  
benefits. Sumitra (2023) similarly emphasizes that without complementary policy support and capacity building,  
MSMEs risk exclusion from digital ecosystems. Gawali (n.d.) stresses the importance of bridging the rural-urban  
divide, warning that digital deserts could deepen inequities if left unaddressed. Together, these studies indicate  
that while digital platforms are transformative, equitable adoption requires systemic support. Parallel to  
digitalisation, research on multimodal connectivity highlights its crucial role in reducing India’s high logistics  
Page 2639  
costs. Tavasszy (2018) and Menon and Shah (2020) demonstrate that multimodal transport corridors integrating  
road, rail, waterways, and air transport reduce time, cost, and carbon footprint. Cai, Sharkawi, and Taasim (2024)  
further explore how digital tools enhance multimodal efficiency through real-time tracking and route  
optimization. These findings are particularly significant for MSMEs, which typically lack scale economies and  
rely on predictable, affordable logistics to remain competitive. Talluri and Ananthamurthy (2022) confirm that  
improved multimodal corridors empower MSMEs by ensuring reliable access to markets. Hofman (2015)  
provides a conceptual foundation for integrated logistics systems, arguing that physical connectivity must be  
paired with digital data interoperability for maximum gains. This insight echoes Yin and Ran (2022), who  
emphasize that integrated digital-physical systems reduce coordination friction, enhance resilience, and support  
diversified supply networks. The synergy between DPI and multimodal logistics thus emerges as a critical theme:  
while digital platforms orchestrate flows of information, multimodal networks optimize flows of goods. A  
number of studies bridge the gap between digitalisation and logistics. Acharya et al. (2024) propose that DPI-  
enabled platforms can serve as orchestrators of multimodal logistics by ensuring standardized data exchange,  
digital payments, and shipment visibility. Similarly, Hofman (2015) highlights the need for federated data  
pipelines to coordinate multiple stakeholders across transport modes. These insights are corroborated by Cai et  
al. (2024), who find that integrated systems not only improve efficiency but also enhance MSME  
creditworthiness by providing digital transaction records useful for financial institutions. Simran Kaur (2025)  
further argues that such integration aligns with the national vision of a resilient, inclusive, and competitive India  
by 2047. The literature also identifies barriers to seamless integration. Khandelwal and Priya (2024) point to  
capital constraints that prevent small firms from adopting advanced supply chain technologies. Pandey (2024)  
highlights managerial and operational bottlenecks, noting that many MSMEs struggle to adapt business  
processes to new digital environments. Zika (2022) and Choudhury et al. (2021) argue that technology adoption  
without organizational restructuring produces suboptimal outcomes, as digitisation must be accompanied by  
process redesign and workforce upskilling. Together, these findings suggest that infrastructural investments must  
be complemented by capacity-building measures.  
Policy interventions emerge as a recurring theme in the literature. Mah Sheena et al. (2022) stress the importance  
of government-led initiatives such as ONDC, which catalyze private innovation while ensuring inclusivity.  
Buteau (n.d.) and Mah Sheena et al. (2023) recommend integrated policy frameworks that combine infrastructure  
investment with digital literacy programs and regulatory support for interoperability. Bright (2025) and Simran  
Kaur (2025) reinforce this view by underscoring the role of DPI in advancing the goals of Vision Viksit Bharat  
2047, particularly in fostering inclusive growth and global competitiveness. Another important dimension  
concerns sustainability. Menon and Shah (2020) and Zainurrafiqi and Gazali (2024) emphasize that supply chain  
reforms must also account for environmental impacts. Studies on green supply chains suggest that combining  
digital optimization with multimodal transport reduces emissions and improves long-term sustainability. This  
perspective expands the significance of DPI and multimodal integration beyond efficiency and competitiveness,  
situating them within broader ecological and developmental goals. Despite the robust literature, gaps remain.  
Few studies examine how DPI-enabled multimodal logistics specifically benefit MSME clusters in different  
regions of India. Most existing research either focuses on national-level frameworks (e.g., ONDC, India Stack)  
or examines logistics improvements in isolation. Hofman (2015) and Tavasszy (2018) provide conceptual  
models, but empirical evidence on how federated digital systems interact with multimodal corridors to reduce  
MSME logistics costs is limited. Similarly, the literature rarely addresses how digital transaction trails created  
through DPI can directly influence MSME access to formal credit markets. These gaps suggest the need for  
integrated, context-specific frameworks that align national digital platforms with regional connectivity  
initiatives. Overall, the reviewed literature underscores three central insights. First, DPI is essential for  
democratizing access to digital tools, markets, and finance, especially for MSMEs. Second, multimodal  
connectivity offers structural solutions to India’s high logistics costs, improving competitiveness across  
industries. Third, the integration of digital and physical infrastructures is key to unlocking transformative supply  
chain efficiencies. However, persistent gaps in adoption, capacity, and policy coordination highlight the need for  
holistic strategies that combine technological, institutional, and infrastructural interventions. This body of  
scholarship provides the foundation for exploring how DPI and multimodal connectivity can jointly catalyse  
MSME supply chain transformation. By integrating digital public goods with physical logistics infrastructure,  
India has the potential to drive inclusive growth, enhance resilience, and realize its vision of becoming a  
developed nation by 2047.  
Page 2640  
Table 1: Literature Review Table  
Sr. No. Author(s)  
Year Focus  
Key Findings  
Relevance  
1
Khimani &  
Singhal  
2024 Digital infrastructure Transition from “digital  
Shows role of  
& MSME  
deserts” to “tech havens” infrastructure in  
competitiveness  
enhances innovation &  
growth  
MSME  
competitiveness  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Mah Sheena K M, 2022 ONDC for  
ONDC enables fair digital Highlights e-commerce  
Aithal & Sharma  
SMEs/MSMEs  
commerce & inclusive  
growth  
democratization  
Acharya, Cisneros 2023 Supply Chain as a  
SuppliFlow improves  
efficiency, reduces cost,  
enhances visibility  
Standardized  
integration for MSMEs  
& Markus  
Service  
Arthi Jone &  
2024 Digital  
Boosts productivity &  
market reach  
Policy push for digital  
adoption  
Dhanalakshmi  
transformation &  
MSME growth  
(Anon.)  
2023 Digital supply chain  
in India  
IoT, AI, blockchain  
improve efficiency; infra  
gaps remain  
Shows digital  
opportunities &  
challenges  
Sharon  
2021 Roadmap for digital  
MSMEs  
End-to-end ecosystem  
with finance, payments,  
skills  
Calls for govt.–user–  
provider collaboration  
Sumitra  
2021 Digital  
transformation  
Essential for  
competitiveness amidst  
Practical strategies for  
survival  
survival for MSMEs crises  
Gawali  
2022 MSME constraints & Transformation improves Provides way forward  
digital solutions  
productivity &  
competitiveness  
9
Benkhider et al.  
2024 Supply chain  
transformation  
Connectivity improves  
resilience, transparency  
Useful for resilient  
MSMEs  
10  
11  
12  
Vijay Kumar &  
Harshitha  
2023 ONDC  
implementation  
Empowers MSMEs &  
challenges monopolies  
Important for small  
retailers  
Tiwari et al.  
2024 Supply chain  
digitisation  
ERP, IoT, blockchain  
enhance resilience & trust chain  
Builds traceable supply  
Zainurrafiqi &  
Gazali  
2024 Green & digital  
supply chain  
Positive impact on MSME Shows  
performance  
competitiveness–  
resilience link  
13  
14  
Harshitha  
Cai et al.  
2023 ONDC evaluation  
Opportunities for  
MSMEs, curbs  
monopolies  
Relevance for e-  
commerce adoption  
2024 Digitalization &  
diversification  
Lowers transaction costs  
& improves resilience  
Key to supply security  
Page 2641  
15  
16  
Choudhury et al.  
Yu et al.  
2021 Critical success  
factors in digital SC  
12 CSFs identified, TISM Framework for SC  
model  
efficiency  
2024 Digital  
transformation &  
innovation  
Improves collaborative  
innovation & market  
performance  
Explains innovation  
pathways  
17  
Yin & Ran  
2022 Supply chain  
resilience  
Diversification +  
digitalization improve  
resilience  
fsQCA method insights  
Anticipates global DPI  
18  
19  
20  
21  
22  
23  
24  
25  
26  
Hofman  
Bright  
Datta  
2015 Global data pipelines Need interoperability for  
logistics  
2025 Digital MSMEs  
Ecosystem essential for  
growth  
Reinforces digital  
policy goals  
2024 Digital tech for  
resilience  
Govt + users support  
ecosystem  
Shows resilience-  
building role  
Khandelwal &  
Priya  
2024 MSME digital  
challenges  
Growth prospects, but  
tech knowhow gaps  
Policy + skilling need  
Hemdev  
2024 SCM in India  
Innovations drive  
competitiveness  
India’s path to global  
hub  
Vandita &  
Srivastava  
2023 Digitalization in  
MSMEs  
Covid-19 accelerated  
adoption  
Explains survival  
digitalization  
Kaur  
2025 Commerce role in  
Viksit Bharat  
MSMEs + digital infra  
vital  
Strategic roadmap  
Menon & Shah  
Kasim  
2020 Digital SC for SMEs Adoption crucial for  
survival  
Warns against lack of  
awareness  
2023 Digital-based  
transformation  
Improves efficiency &  
literacy matters  
Role of digital literacy  
27  
28  
Timur  
2023 Digital SC challenges SMEs lag despite benefits Covid highlighted need  
Tavasszy  
2018 Innovation in  
multimodal SC  
Tech improves efficiency Important for  
& sustainability  
multimodality  
29  
30  
31  
32  
33  
Mudda et al.  
2017 Agriculture SC  
digitization  
IT empowers small  
farmers  
Agriculture supply  
chain  
Mah Sheena K M 2023 Govt schemes &  
et al.  
ONDC, OCEN, NDEA  
boost productivity  
Govt role in MSME  
uplift  
MSMEs  
Khatri et al.  
2023 Covid impact on  
MSMEs  
Accelerated digitalization Pandemic-driven  
adoption  
(Anon.)  
2022 Blockchain in  
MSMEs SC  
Streamlines SC, improves Tech adoption gap  
efficiency  
Pandey et al.  
2024 Need for SME  
digitalization  
Improves efficiency &  
quality  
Highlights adoption  
barriers  
Page 2642  
34  
35  
36  
37  
38  
39  
40  
41  
42  
43  
44  
45  
46  
47  
48  
Jha  
2021 Industry 4.0 in SMEs Evidence of adoption  
challenges  
Industrial readiness  
Bhattacharya et al. 2022 Enablers of  
Seven enablers, top  
disruption mitigation management crucial  
MSME resilience  
factors  
Talluri &  
Ananthamurthy  
2022 SC digitalization in  
Positive influence on  
performance  
Empirical MSME mfg  
study  
mfg  
Majumdar et al.  
Melekhova  
Wang  
2020 E-commerce &  
ASEAN  
Digital connectivity links Regional integration  
SMEs  
2019 Digital SC models  
Flexibility & reliability  
via ML & blockchain  
Classification model  
2024 SC digitization &  
business  
Impacts digital  
transformation success  
Case analysis  
Raghavan et al.  
Shaikh  
2019 India Stack  
Smartphone penetration + Foundation of DPI  
DPI  
2024 Digital SC &  
economy  
Enhances efficiency &  
reduces costs  
Business development  
Pandey  
2024 MSMEs & GVCs  
Challenges & policy recs  
Global supply chain  
integration  
Khan & Uddin  
2023 Managerial  
digitalization  
Skills crucial for MSME  
performance  
Human capital in  
digital adoption  
Khmelnitskaya & 2020 Digital SC network  
Sizov  
SC efficiency via tested  
systems  
Transformation  
examples  
Thatai  
2016 Digital India  
initiative  
9 pillars for  
transformation  
Foundational national  
mission  
Zika  
2022 SC procurement  
Improves visibility &  
transparency  
Lessons on digital  
failure  
Singh  
2023 AI & ML in SC  
Enhance forecasting &  
decision-making  
Next-gen SCM  
Tripathi & Gupta 2021 India readiness for  
Industry 4.0  
Readiness score 0.44,  
govt role  
Readiness assessment  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
The present study adopts a qualitative and exploratory research design, relying primarily on a comprehensive  
review of secondary sources. The methodology is structured to systematically analyse existing scholarship,  
identify knowledge gaps, and derive research objectives that align with the overarching aim of understanding  
the role of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and multimodal connectivity in transforming MSME supply chains  
for Vision Viksit Bharat 2047. The first step involved the identification and collection of relevant academic  
literature. Nearly fifty research papers were reviewed, representing diverse sources from peer-reviewed journals,  
conference proceedings, institutional reports, and policy documents. These papers were accessed through  
established databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate, ensuring both breadth  
and credibility in the selection of literature. The time frame of the sources spanned from foundational works on  
multimodal logistics and supply chain management to more recent studies on digital public goods, digitalisation,  
Page 2643  
and MSME competitiveness, providing both historical and contemporary perspectives. The second step entailed  
content analysis of the reviewed literature. Each paper was examined for its study objectives, theoretical  
underpinnings, research design, and key findings. Special attention was paid to works addressing MSMEs, DPI,  
digitalisation of supply chains, and multimodal logistics in the Indian and global contexts. A structured literature  
review table was created, capturing citation details, study focus, and key contributions. This systematic  
organisation facilitated comparative analysis and highlighted recurring themes, contradictions, and  
underexplored areas. The third step involved synthesising insights from the reviewed literature to identify gaps.  
The analysis revealed that while extensive studies exist on DPI and multimodal connectivity separately, few  
explore their combined potential in addressing MSME supply chain challenges. Furthermore, empirical work  
linking DPI-enabled logistics with MSME credit access, regional cluster competitiveness, and sustainability  
remains limited. These insights formed the basis of the research gap outlined in this study.  
Finally, the research objectives were developed by translating the identified gaps into focused questions and  
directions for inquiry. The objectives serve as guiding pillars for further empirical or conceptual research and  
are designed to contribute both to academic discourse and policy formulation. This study employs a literature-  
based methodology that integrates systematic review, content analysis, and thematic synthesis. By critically  
engaging with approximately fifty research papers across multiple databases, the methodology ensures rigor,  
comprehensiveness, and relevance in framing the research gap and objectives. This approach provides a robust  
foundation for subsequent exploration of how DPI and multimodal connectivity can jointly catalyse MSME  
supply chain transformation in India.  
Research Gap  
The reviewed literature provides valuable insights into the transformative potential of Digital Public  
Infrastructure (DPI) and multimodal connectivity for supply chain management, especially in the context of  
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). While extensive studies explore the individual impacts of  
digitalisation and logistics integration, a significant research gap emerges at their intersection, particularly in  
relation to MSME supply chains in India. First, the literature is fragmented in its treatment of DPI and  
multimodal connectivity. Studies on DPI largely focus on digital public goods such as India Stack, Unified  
Payments Interface (UPI), and the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), highlighting their roles in  
democratizing market access, reducing transaction costs, and fostering inclusivity. Parallel research on  
multimodal connectivity emphasizes the importance of integrating road, rail, waterways, and ports to improve  
logistics efficiency and reduce costs. However, very few studies examine how these two domains converge to  
generate integrated supply chain benefits. This disconnect represents a critical gap, as MSMEs are most likely  
to gain from systems where digital and physical infrastructures are designed to complement one another. Second,  
much of the existing scholarship remains conceptual or descriptive, with limited empirical evidence on how  
DPI-enabled multimodal connectivity impacts MSME operations at the cluster or regional level. For instance,  
while Acharya et al. (2024) propose digital platforms such as SuppliFlow for logistics orchestration, empirical  
validation of such frameworks in real-world MSME contexts remains sparse. Similarly, studies by Hofman  
(2015) and Tavasszy (2018) present conceptual models for integrated logistics systems but do not address how  
these can be operationalized within the Indian MSME ecosystem. This lack of grounded empirical work restricts  
our understanding of context-specific challenges and opportunities. Third, the literature underexplores the role  
of DPI in addressing financial constraints faced by MSMEs. Several studies point to the importance of digital  
transaction records in improving creditworthiness, but empirical analyses linking DPI-enabled supply chain  
visibility to formal credit access are largely absent. This omission is significant because access to affordable  
finance remains one of the most pressing challenges for MSMEs, and DPI could serve as a bridge by creating  
transparent digital trails that lenders can rely on. Fourth, there is limited exploration of capacity-building and  
institutional readiness for adopting integrated digital-physical systems. Scholars such as Zika (2022) and  
Choudhury et al. (2021) stress that technology adoption without process redesign leads to suboptimal outcomes.  
Yet the literature offers little guidance on how MSMEs particularly micro and rural enterprises can overcome  
digital literacy gaps, managerial constraints, and infrastructural limitations when engaging with DPI and  
multimodal networks. This gap points to the need for research that not only considers technological design but  
also addresses institutional mechanisms, skilling programs, and governance frameworks necessary for successful  
adoption.  
Page 2644  
Finally, sustainability considerations are underrepresented in the integrated discussion of DPI and multimodal  
connectivity. While individual studies highlight green supply chains and multimodal transport’s role in reducing  
emissions, very few examine how digital platforms can be harnessed to monitor, manage, and optimize  
sustainable practices across supply chains. This represents an opportunity to link MSME competitiveness with  
broader environmental and developmental goals, aligning supply chain transformation with India’s sustainability  
commitments. The literature establishes the foundational importance of DPI and multimodal connectivity for  
MSME growth but leaves critical questions unanswered: How can DPI be deliberately designed to orchestrate  
multimodal supply chains for MSMEs? What mechanisms ensure that these integrations translate into  
measurable improvements in cost efficiency, credit access, and market expansion? How can policy frameworks  
and institutional support systems be structured to enable equitable adoption across diverse clusters? And how  
can sustainability be embedded into this integration? Addressing these gaps is essential for developing an  
evidence-based framework that aligns with India’s vision of a digitally empowered and logistically efficient  
Viksit Bharat by 2047.  
Research Objectives  
RO1: To examine how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) lowers transaction and coordination costs across  
multimodal supply chains for MSMEs in India.  
RO2: To investigate how the integration of DPI with multimodal connectivity can enhance MSME access to  
markets, finance, and formal supply chain networks.  
RO3: To analyze the institutional, infrastructural, and capacity-building challenges that hinder MSMEs from  
fully adopting integrated digital-physical supply chain systems.  
RO4: To propose a conceptual framework that aligns DPI and multimodal connectivity with the policy vision  
of Viksit Bharat 2047, focusing on efficiency, inclusivity, and sustainability.  
India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI): A Revolution in Inclusion:  
India’s Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) represents one of the most ambitious and transformative public digital  
initiatives in the world. At its core, DPI is designed as a set of secure, interoperable, and open-standard digital  
systems that enable equitable access to essential services at scale. Unlike proprietary digital ecosystems that  
often exclude vulnerable groups, India’s DPI is framed as a societal-level public good, ensuring that every citizen  
regardless of geography, income, or social status can participate in the digital economy.  
The Foundation of DPI  
The foundation of India’s DPI lies in its open, secure, and interoperable architecture. By adhering to open  
standards, it ensures that multiple stakeholders from government agencies to private enterprises can build upon  
the same base without creating fragmented or siloed systems. This design principle is critical for inclusion, as it  
prevents monopolization and ensures that citizens can access services through diverse channels. DPI is not just  
a technological framework but also a governance innovation that balances scale, accessibility, and security.  
Core Components of DPI  
The success of India’s DPI can be traced to its three core components, which function synergistically to empower  
citizens:  
Aadhaar: With over 1.4 billion unique digital identities, Aadhaar serves as the foundation for identity  
verification and service delivery. It has enabled millions to access welfare benefits, open bank accounts,  
and authenticate themselves in the digital economy. Aadhaar reduces duplication, curbs fraud, and  
ensures that benefits reach the intended recipients efficiently.  
Unified Payments Interface (UPI): UPI has revolutionized India’s financial ecosystem by allowing  
seamless, real-time, and low-cost digital payments. It is interoperable across banks, fintech platforms,  
Page 2645  
and merchants, ensuring that even small businesses and individuals can engage in digital transactions.  
For MSMEs and rural populations, UPI has been a lifeline, enabling financial inclusion and expanding  
access to markets.  
Data Empowerment and Protection Architecture (DEPA): DEPA provides individuals with control  
over their personal data while enabling them to use it productively. By empowering citizens to share  
verified data with consent, DEPA supports access to credit, insurance, and other critical services. This  
framework balances innovation with privacy and security, addressing global concerns about data misuse.  
Transformative Impact of DPI  
The impact of DPI has been profound. Financial inclusion in India has surged from around 17 percent to over  
80 percent in less than a decade, driven largely by the synergy of Aadhaar-enabled authentication, Jan Dhan  
Yojana bank accounts, and UPI-based transactions. Subsidy leakages, once a chronic issue in welfare  
distribution, have been significantly reduced saving the government an estimated $25 billion annually. These  
savings not only improve fiscal efficiency but also ensure that resources are redirected toward development  
priorities. Beyond numbers, DPI has democratized access to essential services such as healthcare, education, and  
e-commerce. By lowering transaction costs, enhancing transparency, and creating digital trails, it has also  
expanded credit access for small businesses and individuals who were previously excluded from the formal  
financial system. The ability of DPI to scale equitably makes it a model for other developing countries seeking  
to combine digital innovation with inclusion.  
India’s Digital Public Infrastructure is more than a technological framework; it is a societal innovation that  
bridges the digital divide and fosters inclusion at scale. By integrating identity, payments, and data  
empowerment, DPI has transformed the way citizens access services and participate in the economy. Its success  
demonstrates that digital systems, when designed as public goods, can drive both economic efficiency and social  
equity. As India advances toward Vision Viksit Bharat 2047, DPI will remain a cornerstone of inclusive growth  
and a benchmark for global digital governance.  
Credit Enablement Network (OCEN): Democratizing MSME Credit Access:  
Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a pivotal role in India’s economy by contributing  
significantly to employment, manufacturing, and exports. However, one of the greatest barriers faced by MSMEs  
has been access to affordable and timely credit. Traditional financial institutions often view these enterprises as  
high-risk due to the lack of collateral, limited formal records, and irregular cash flows. As a result, MSMEs have  
long been trapped in a cycle of credit exclusion, relying on informal lending channels that impose high interest  
rates and constrain growth. To address this systemic challenge, the Credit Enablement Network (OCEN) has  
emerged as a groundbreaking digital framework aimed at democratizing credit access for MSMEs.  
Digital Footprint Analysis  
At the heart of OCEN lies the use of digital transaction data to create accurate and reliable credit profiles for  
MSMEs. Instead of relying solely on collateral or traditional financial statements, OCEN leverages the digital  
footprints generated by businesses through payments, invoices, and other transactions. By aggregating and  
analyzing this data, lenders can build a clearer picture of an MSME’s financial health and operational viability.  
This approach helps overcome the asymmetry of information that has historically disadvantaged small  
enterprises in formal lending.  
Streamlined Application Process  
Another key feature of OCEN is its ability to simplify the loan application process. MSMEs traditionally face  
significant paperwork, complex procedures, and repeated compliance requirements when approaching banks for  
credit. OCEN eliminates much of this friction by standardizing the application process and reducing dependency  
on collateral. By connecting borrowers, lenders, and digital platforms through a common protocol, it ensures  
Page 2646  
that loan applications can be processed quickly and transparently. This not only reduces transaction costs but  
also improves trust between lenders and MSMEs.  
Expanded Credit Availability  
OCEN enables financial institutions to design tailored financing solutions that reflect the actual performance of  
MSMEs. Since creditworthiness is assessed through real-time business data rather than static financial records,  
lenders can extend credit even to those firms previously excluded from formal banking systems. This expands  
the availability of credit and makes it more inclusive, particularly for micro and rural enterprises that form the  
majority of India’s MSME sector. By diversifying risk assessment methods, OCEN also encourages more lenders  
to participate in the MSME financing ecosystem.  
Growth and Job Creation  
The ultimate impact of OCEN is visible in its potential to foster growth and job creation. Access to affordable  
credit allows MSMEs to invest in technology, scale up operations, and expand into new markets. This in turn  
creates sustainable employment opportunities and drives regional economic development. By linking digital  
public infrastructure with credit access, OCEN also strengthens financial inclusion and aligns with India’s long-  
term development goals under Vision Viksit Bharat 2047.  
The Credit Enablement Network represents a paradigm shift in how credit is assessed, delivered, and consumed  
in the MSME sector. By leveraging digital footprints, streamlining processes, expanding credit availability, and  
fueling growth, OCEN has the potential to democratize finance for millions of enterprises. It transforms credit  
from being an obstacle into a growth enabler, thereby ensuring that MSMEs the backbone of India’s economy  
are equipped to thrive in the digital era.  
DISCUSSION  
The emergence of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) marks a defining moment in India’s journey toward  
industrial transformation. Unlike isolated technology interventions, DPI operates as a system of interoperable  
platforms that reconfigure how businesses, markets, and governments interact. This section discusses the  
findings in relation to the four research objectives, highlighting both opportunities and constraints in  
strengthening supply chain dynamics for India’s MSME clusters.  
To analyze the role of DPI in strengthening MSME supply chains in India  
Digital Public Infrastructure has become the backbone of inclusive industrial growth by providing MSMEs with  
platforms that reduce entry barriers, lower transaction costs, and increase visibility in national and global  
markets. For example, ONDC (Open Network for Digital Commerce) democratizes e-commerce by creating an  
open and interoperable network where small retailers can list their products alongside large corporations. This  
directly challenges the dominance of monopolistic platforms while giving MSMEs fairer access to customers.  
Similarly, OCEN (Open Credit Enablement Network) redefines credit access by enabling cash-flow–based  
lending rather than asset-based financing, a structural shift that benefits undercapitalized entrepreneurs. The  
adoption of these platforms has already shown positive results in MSME clusters engaged in textiles, handicrafts,  
and food processing, where supply chains are typically fragmented. ONDC allows these producers to bypass  
intermediaries, leading to better margins and greater transparency. Additionally, DPI-driven logistics initiatives,  
such as PM Gati Shakti, improve multimodal connectivity, enabling MSMEs to integrate more seamlessly with  
domestic and export markets. Thus, DPI not only strengthens operational efficiency but also enhances resilience  
by making supply chains more adaptive to disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic.  
To evaluate the potential of DPI in promoting inclusivity for women and specially-abled entrepreneurs  
A distinctive strength of DPI lies in its inclusive design philosophy. By embedding accessibility and  
interoperability, DPI platforms provide opportunities for marginalized groups traditionally excluded from  
industrial growth. Women entrepreneurs, who face systemic barriers such as limited mobility, lack of collateral,  
Page 2647  
and time constraints, benefit from ONDC-enabled digital storefronts that reduce dependency on physical  
marketplaces. Similarly, OCEN-backed microcredit mechanisms give women-led businesses and specially-abled  
entrepreneurs access to working capital without lengthy bureaucratic procedures. Evidence suggests that women-  
led MSMEs adopting digital tools demonstrate higher revenue growth and greater resilience to market shocks.  
For specially-abled entrepreneurs, DPI platforms that integrate assistive technologies (voice commands,  
simplified interfaces, and vernacular support) remove critical barriers to participation. These advances directly  
contribute to social equity, ensuring that industrial transformation does not remain limited to resource-rich actors  
but instead empowers groups historically left behind. However, inclusivity is not automatic. Persistent gender  
gaps in digital literacy, unequal access to devices, and cultural biases restrict participation. Similarly, while DPI  
frameworks are technically inclusive, their successful implementation requires capacity-building programs that  
train entrepreneurs to navigate digital systems confidently. Without such interventions, there is a risk of  
reinforcing rather than dismantling inequalities.  
To examine challenges in the adoption and implementation of DPI in MSME supply chains  
Despite the promise of DPI, its adoption across India’s diverse MSME clusters faces substantial challenges. The  
first and most visible challenge is the digital divide. Rural and semi-urban clusters, where many MSMEs operate,  
still suffer from patchy internet connectivity, low bandwidth, and limited access to affordable devices. This  
restricts their ability to fully leverage platforms like ONDC or logistics tools embedded in Gati Shakti. The  
second challenge lies in digital literacy and trust. Many MSME owners remain hesitant to engage with digital  
platforms due to limited technical knowledge and concerns over data security, privacy, and fraud. For instance,  
while ONDC promises transparency, small entrepreneurs may still distrust algorithm-driven visibility or fear  
being overshadowed by larger, tech-savvy competitors. Third, institutional and regulatory readiness remains  
uneven. While policy frameworks such as the Data Protection Act and DPI guidelines exist, their enforcement  
is still evolving. MSMEs worry about compliance costs, cyber threats, and the complexity of aligning their  
operations with multiple digital frameworks simultaneously. Finally, financing adoption poses hurdles. Although  
OCEN enables cash-flow–based lending, many MSMEs are reluctant to borrow due to prior experiences with  
debt traps or hidden costs. Without strong financial literacy programs, credit access risks becoming underutilized.  
These challenges underscore that DPI’s transformative potential can only be realized through multi-stakeholder  
collaboration involving government, private players, technology providers, and grassroots organizations.  
To suggest strategies for leveraging DPI to ensure resilient and competitive MSME ecosystems  
To move from promise to practice, India must focus on strategies that bridge gaps in infrastructure, literacy, and  
governance. First, capacity-building initiatives tailored to MSME clusters are essential. Training programs  
should focus on digital literacy, cybersecurity awareness, and the practical use of platforms like ONDC and  
OCEN. Partnerships with local trade associations and NGOs can amplify reach and contextualize training.  
Second, targeted infrastructure investments are required in rural and semi-urban areas to ensure equitable access  
to high-speed internet and affordable devices. Public–private partnerships can accelerate the rollout of  
connectivity solutions, enabling MSMEs in remote areas to participate fully in DPI ecosystems. Third, fostering  
trust and adoption requires transparent governance mechanisms. Clear regulations on data protection,  
algorithmic fairness, and grievance redressal will increase confidence among small entrepreneurs. Moreover,  
platforms must adopt human-centric design, offering vernacular language support, simple navigation, and  
features tailored for women and differently-abled users. Finally, the integration of sustainability principles within  
DPI is critical. By embedding environmental, social, and governance (ESG) frameworks into supply chain  
platforms, India can ensure that digital transformation does not come at the expense of long-term ecological and  
social well-being. MSMEs adopting green practices can be incentivized through preferential lending on OCEN  
or visibility boosts on ONDC, aligning competitiveness with sustainability.  
DPI is not just a technological framework but a socio-economic transformation tool. Its impact is evident across  
supply chain efficiency, inclusivity, and resilience. Yet, successful adoption requires addressing structural  
challenges that impede equitable access. By aligning policy, infrastructure, and stakeholder participation, DPI  
can become the cornerstone of India’s industrial transition, driving both competitiveness and social equity in  
line with the aspirations of Viksit Bharat 2047.  
Page 2648  
CONCLUSION  
India’s industrial transformation is at a critical juncture where technology, policy, and entrepreneurship  
converge. This study set out to explore how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) through platforms like ONDC,  
OCEN, and PM Gati Shakti can strengthen supply chain dynamics for MSMEs, with particular attention to  
women and specially-abled entrepreneurs. The findings confirm that DPI is more than a technological  
innovation; it is an institutional framework that redefines access, efficiency, and inclusivity within India’s supply  
chains. First, the research highlights DPI’s ability to democratize markets and finance. ONDC enables small  
firms to compete with established players by creating open, interoperable e-commerce networks. Similarly,  
OCEN’s shift to cash-flow–based lending empowers undercapitalized MSMEs to secure credit without the  
traditional barriers of collateral or credit history. These structural changes not only level the playing field but  
also increase resilience by reducing dependency on intermediaries and informal lenders. Second, inclusivity  
emerges as both a strength and a challenge. Women and specially-abled entrepreneurs benefit from the  
accessibility of digital storefronts, simplified credit systems, and supportive logistics infrastructure. However,  
without targeted capacity building, the risk of digital exclusion persists. Bridging gendered digital divides,  
designing assistive interfaces, and offering vernacular support remain critical tasks for policymakers and  
platform developers alike. Third, adoption challenges underscore the complex reality of implementation.  
Infrastructure deficits, low digital literacy, and concerns over trust and data privacy limit the speed and scale of  
DPI penetration, particularly in rural and semi-urban MSME clusters. Unless these barriers are systematically  
addressed, DPI risks reinforcing existing inequalities instead of dismantling them.  
Finally, the study identifies actionable strategies for strengthening MSME ecosystems: investments in rural  
connectivity, localized training programs, transparent governance frameworks, and sustainability-linked  
incentives. These measures will not only encourage adoption but also ensure that digital transformation aligns  
with India’s broader development goals, including Viksit Bharat 2047. Digital Public Infrastructure has the  
potential to act as a catalyst for inclusive, resilient, and globally competitive supply chains. Its success, however,  
will depend on balancing technological advancement with equitable access and robust governance. For  
MSMEs—the backbone of India’s economy DPI offers a pathway to growth, innovation, and integration into  
global value chains. For policymakers and stakeholders, it provides a blueprint to ensure that industrial  
transformation is both competitive and inclusive. By embedding inclusivity, trust, and sustainability at the heart  
of digital platforms, India can harness DPI not just as a tool for efficiency, but as a foundation for long-term  
socio-economic transformation.  
REFERENCES  
1. Khimani, M., & Singhal, A. (2024, December 2). From digital deserts to tech havens: The role of digital  
infrastructure in MSME competitiveness. EPRAInternational Journal of Economic and Business Review.  
2. Mah Sheena, K. M., Aithal, S., & Sharma, K. R. S. (2022, October 3). Open Network for Digital  
Commerce - ONDC (E-Commerce) infrastructure: To promote SME/MSME sector for inclusive and  
sustainable digital economic growth. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social  
3. Acharya, S., Cisneros Saldana, S. M., & Markus, H. (2021). Developing supply chain as a service through  
standardized  
4. Jone, I. A., & Dhanalakshmi, C. (2024, April 30). MSME growth is being propelled by India’s digital  
transformation. ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts.  
digital  
integration.  
Proceedings  
of  
the  
Supply  
Chain  
Conference.  
5. [Anonymous]. (2023, June 3). Digital transformation in supply chain India: Challenges and  
6. Sharon, B. (2021). Roadmap for digital technology to foster India’s MSME ecosystem—Opportunities  
021-00345-4  
Page 2649  
7. Sumitra, R. (2022). Digital transformation an inevitable agenda for MSMEs to survive, surge ahead and  
8. Gawali, R. B. (2023). How digital transformation can help Indian MSMEs in overcoming constraints and  
94p  
9. Benkhider, N., Kherbachi, S., & Keddari, N. (2024, December 19). Digital transformation in supply chain  
management: A paradigm shift towards enhanced efficiency, agility, and resilience. Preprints.  
10. Vijay Kumar, M. N., & Harshitha, M. (2023, January 1). An evaluation of Open Network for Digital  
Commerce (ONDC) implementation for MSMEs in India. Modern Marketing Research.  
11. Tiwari, M. K., Bidanda, B., & Geunes, J. (2024, March 8). Supply chain digitisation and management.  
12. Zainurrafiqi, Z., & Gazali, G. (2024, March 1). Supply chain digitalization, green supply chain, supply  
chain resilience toward competitiveness and MSMEs performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen.  
13. Harshitha, M. (2023, January 1). An evaluation of Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC)  
implementation for MSMEs in India. International Journal of Trendy Research in Engineering and  
14. Cai, J., Sharkawi, I., & Taasim, S. I. (2024, April 1). How does digital transformation promote supply  
chain diversification? From the perspective of supply chain transaction costs. Finance Research Letters.  
15. Choudhury, A., Behl, A., Sheorey, P., & [Author]. (2021, January 19). Digital supply chain to unlock  
2020-0461  
16. Yu, Y., Zeng, H., & Zhang, M. (2024, April 24). Digital transformation for supply chain collaborative  
innovation and market performance. European Journal of Innovation Management.  
17. Yin, W., & Ran, W. (2022, June 23). Supply chain diversification, digital transformation, and supply  
chain  
resilience:  
Configuration  
analysis  
based  
on  
fsQCA.  
Sustainability.  
18. Hofman, W. (2015, October 13). Towards a federated infrastructure for the global data pipeline. In  
Federated Infrastructure for Global Data (pp. xxxxxx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-  
25013-7_39  
19. Bright, R. (2025, January 18). Micro, small and medium enterprises: Driving growth through digital  
transformation.  
20. Datta, D. B. (2024, March 15). Digital technology and MSMEs: A step to strengthen the sustainable and  
resilient economy. Anveshak International Journal of Management.  
International  
Journal  
for  
Science  
Technology  
and  
Engineering.  
21. Khandelwal, R., & Priya, A. (2024, June 30). Digital transformation of MSMEs: Strategy and challenges.  
22. Hemdev, O. (2024, September 5). Supply chain management in India: Challenges, innovations, and the  
path to global competitiveness in a dynamic economic environment. International Journal of Science and  
23. Vandita, & Srivastava, R. B. L. (2023, October 11). Role of digitalization in the growth of MSMEs in  
India: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research.  
24. Kaur, S. (2025, January 16). The strategic role of commerce and management in achieving Viksit Bharat  
2047.  
International  
Journal  
for  
Multidisciplinary  
Research.  
25. Menon, S., & Shah, S. (2020, November 24). Growth of digital supply chains for SME transformation.  
Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology Management and Digitalization.  
Page 2650  
26. Kasim, I. A. L. (2021). Digital-based transformation support: The acceleration of MSMEs’ development.  
27. Timur, K. K. (2023, January 1). A study of key challenges in implementation of digital supply chain in  
the context of Indian SMEs. In Challenges in Digital Supply Chains (pp. xxxxxx). Springer.  
28. Tavasszy, L. A. (2018, January 1). Innovation and technology in multimodal supply chains. OECD  
Transport Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/52A6BC82-EN  
29. Mudda, S. K., Giddi, C. B., & Pvgk, M. (2017, January 1). A study on the digitization of supply chains  
in  
agricultureAn  
Indian  
experience.  
Journal  
of  
Agricultural  
Informatics.  
30. Mah Sheena, K. M., Aithal, S., & Sharma, K. R. S. (2023, January 30). Government initiatives and digital  
innovation for Atma Nirbhar MSMEs/SMEs: To achieve sustainable and inclusive economic growth.  
International  
Journal  
of  
Management,  
Technology,  
and  
Social  
Sciences.  
31. Khatri, P., Kothari, H., & Paliwal, L. R. (2023, January 1). Impact of Covid-19 on digitalization aspect  
on India’s MSMEs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing  
32. [Authors]. (2022, August 25). Scope and challenges of blockchain in Indian supply chain transformation  
for MSMEs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and  
33. Pandey, V., Kumar, A., & Gupta, S. P. (2024, January 1). Assessing the need for the adoption of  
2024-0072  
34. Jha, P. (2021, May 15). Digitization and Industry 4.0 practices: An exploratory study on SMEs in India.  
35. Bhattacharya, L., Chatterjee, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2022, November 30). Critical enablers that mitigate  
supply chain disruption: A perspective from Indian MSMEs. Management and Labour Studies.  
36. [Authors]. (2022, November 30). Critical enablers that mitigate supply chain disruption: A perspective  
37. [Authors]. (2022, August 23). Digital supply chain transformation: Emerging technologies for  
38. Talluri, M., & Ananthamurthy, R. (2022, August 16). Exploratory study on the impact of digitalisation  
of the supply chain on performance and visibility in the Indian manufacturing context. In Proceedings of  
the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.  
39. Majumdar, S. K., Sarma, A. P., & Majumdar, S. (2020, April 23). E-commerce and digital connectivity:  
Unleashing the potential for greater IndiaASEAN integration. Management Review.  
40. Мелехова, В. Д. (2019, March 20). Digital transformation of supply chain management. Human  
41. Wang, J. (2024, July 4). Impact of supply chain digitization on enterprise digital transformation: Case  
analysis and strategies. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences.  
42. Raghavan, V., Jain, S., & Varma, P. (2019, October 24). India StackDigital infrastructure as public  
43. Shaikh, Z. P. (2024, October 29). Digital supply chain management in transformation in business  
economic development, success, and risk factors. In Advances in Electronic Commerce Series.  
44. Pandey, P. (2024, September 1). Navigating the global marketplace: Indian MSME integration into  
global supply chainsPolicy opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Applied Research.  
Page 2651  
45. Khan, M. A. I. A. A., & Uddin, M. A. (2023, August 11). Does managerial propensity towards  
digitalization enhance firm performance? A case study of Indian MSMEs. International Journal of  
46. Khmelnitskaya, Z. B., & Sizov, P. L. (2020, December 7). Digital transformation of the supply chain  
network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics and Business Research.  
47. Thatai, A. (2016, July 1). Digital India: New way of innovating India digitally. International Journal of  
48. Zika, C. (2022, August 23). Digital supply chain procurement transformation. In Digital Supply Chain  
49. Singh, P. K. (2023, December 30). Digital transformation in supply chain management: Artificial  
intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) as catalysts for value creation. International Journal of  
50. Tripathi, S., & Gupta, M. (2021, July 6). Indian supply chain ecosystem readiness assessment for Industry  
Page 2652