The results show that biodiesel production can be possible from both waste rice bran and fish byrpducts oil.
Glycerine production was significantly higher in fish biodiesel than in rice bran oil. Sijtsma and Swaaf
[18]
stated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was a polyunsaturated fatty acid composed of 22 carbon atoms and
six double bonds that belonged to the so-called -3 group. They also reported that fish oil was the major source
of DHA, but alternatively it might be produced by using of microorganisms. Marine microorganisms might
contain large quantities of DHA and were considered a potential source of this important fatty acid. Some of
these organisms could be grown heterotrophically on organic substrates without light. It has been reported that
macro algae contain lipid content of 1.3-7.8% (dw) and could produce biodiesel. In addition in heterotrophic
condition lipid content can be more in algae and could produce more biodiesel
[19]
.
The majority of the commercial biodiesel from sunflower oil is manufactured using homogenous base catalysts
such as NaOH or KOH. The transesterification of used oil collected from the cafeterias at the University of
Guelph, Canada, using an acidic catalyst (H
2
SO
4
) and an alkaline catalyst (KOH) and was compared
[21]
. Two
types of used oils (partially hydrogenated soybean oil and margarine) were transesterified with methanol,
ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, and 2-ethoxyethanol
[21]
. It has been compared between two
catalysts such as KOH and a combination of barium and calcium acetate for the preparation of methyl esters
from waste cooking oil. It was found that all of the catalysts showed reasonable biodiesel production.
CONCLUSION
Waste cooking oil and fish byproducts oil are possible economical choices for biodiesel production, because of
their availability and low cost. Our results prove that biodiesel can be produced from these sources: waste rice
bran and fish byproducts oil (96.6 and 93.2%). Also, the highest glycerin was produced by using fish
byproducts. In this way, these sources can be used as an environmental recycling process and renewable
energy. Further research should be done to compare the ratio of biodiesel production from these sources.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial support for this project from Science Fund, Mosti, Malaysia and Hail University Deanship fund
is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. Goldemberg, J., 2000. World Energy Assessment, Preface.United Nations Development Programme,
new York, NY, USA.
2. Hossain, A.B.M.S. 2021. Fruit Bio-Waste Derived Bio-Ethanol Production and Bioelectricity
Generation as Renewable Energy. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 17 (3): 82-91.
3. Hossain, A.B.M.S., W.M.W. Yusoff, V.N. Veettil.
.
2019. Bioethanol Production from Fruit Biomass as
Bio-antiseptic and Bio-antifermenter: Its Chemical and Biochemical Properties. Journal of Applied
Sciences, 19 (4): 311-318.
4. Kulkarni, M.G. and A.K. Dalai, 2006. Waste cooking iol-an economical source for biodiesel: A review.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45: 2901-2913.
5. Klass, L.D., 1998. Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels and Chemicals, Academic Press, New York,
pp: 1-2.
6. Turkenburg, W.C., 2000. Renewable energy technologies. In: Goldemberg, J. (Ed). World Energy
Assessment, Preface. United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA, pp: 219-272.
7. Hossain, A.B.M.S., 2017. Utilization of Waste Sunflower Oil Biomass as Biodiesel: Its physical and
chemical properties as environmental recycling. Identification and Implementation. Advances in
Bioresearch 8 (5):264-271.
8. Lang, X., A.K. Dalai, N.N. Bakhshi, M.J. Reaney and P.B. Hertz, 2002. Preparation and
characterization of biodiesels from various Bio-Oils. Bioresour. Technol., 80: 53-62.
9. Spolaore, P., C. Joannis-Cassan, E. Duran and A. Isambert, 2006. Commercial applications of
microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 101: 87-96.