INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 508
Biofuel and Glycerin Production from Waste Rice Bran Cooking Oil
and Fish Byproducts Oil as a Sustainable Development and an
Environmental Recycling Process
A.B.M. Sharif Hossain
1
, M Musamma
2
, UB Hossain
3
, Abu Saleh Ahmed
4
1
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2
Institute of Biological Science, University of Malaya Kualalumpu 50603, Malaysia
3
International University of Tonko Abdul Rahman (UNITER), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4
University Technology Malaysia, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.1010000038
Received: 27 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Oct 2025; Published: 03 November 2025
ABSTRACT
The utilization of waste cooking oil from rice bran and fish byproducts including their wastes can contribute to
mitigate the environmental burden like global warming what already being faced by our society. Converting
waste oils /fat bearing materials to biodiesel fuel for recycling and reusing material, and reducing Co
2
emission equivalent to the amount that is produced when petroleum derived diesel fuel is used. Waste cooking
oil ( rice bran oil) and fish oil have emerged as the most promising sources for biodiesel production. This study
was investigated to understand the proper transesterification, amount of biodiesel production (ester) and
physical properties of biodiesel. Biodiesel production was higher in rice bran waste oil than in fish byproducts
oil. However, crude glycerine was lower in rice bran oil than in fish oil. There was a difference in biodiesel
production in different concentrations of methanol and catalyst used in rice bran and fish oil from byproducts.
These results indicate that high quality biodiesel can be produced from waste rice bran and fish byproducts oil
as environmental recycling process.
Keywords : Waste oils, glycerin, methanol, fish oil, Biodiesels
INTRODUCTION
One of the most crucial elements in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and replacing fossil fuels is bioenergy
[1, 2]. Due to population growth and industrialization, the requirement for energy is always rising. Petroleum,
natural gas, coal, hydropower, and nuclear energy are the main sources of this energy [3,4]. The main
drawback of using fuels derived from petroleum is the pollution that petroleum diesel produces into the
atmosphere. One of the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions is the burning of petroleum fuel. In addition
to these emissions, NOx, SOx, CO, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds are among the
numerous air pollutants that petroleum diesel is a significant source of [5].
Biomass is one of the superior energy sources [5]. The widespread use of biomass energy has the potential to
support sustainable development in a number of ways, including social, economic, and environmental [6]. One
such alternative fuel is biodiesel (monoalkyl esters), which is made by transesterifying triglyceride oil with
monohydric alcohols. Biodiesel made from canola, soybean, palm, sunflower, and algae oils has been widely
recognized to be an effective alternative to diesel fuel [7,8,9]. An alternative fuel derived from renewable
resources, biodiesel is harmless and biodegradable. Reliance on petroleum-based fuel could be reduced in part
by producing biodiesel fuel from leftover cooking oil, such as palm, soybean, canola, rice bran, sunflower,
coconut, corn oil, fish oil, chicken fat, and algae [10].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 509
Global warming is a result of the massive amount of fossil fuels that have been used, which has raised the
atmospheric concentration of CO2. Since biomass is a renewable resource and fixes CO2 in the atmosphere
through photosynthesis, it has drawn attention as a potential alternative energy source. Because the CO2 fixed
by photosynthesis balances the CO2 released by burning biomass, burning biomass has no effect on the
atmospheric CO2 balance if it is grown sustainably [11]. The photosynthetic efficiency of algae, including
macro and microalgae, is often higher than that of other biomass [12].
According to Shay [13], one of the best sources of biodiesel is algae. Actually, the most productive feedstock
for biodiesel is algae. Compared to soybeans, it can yield up to 250 times as much oil per acre. Actually, the
only option to generate enough vehicle fuel to replace the current gasoline consumption is to make biodiesel
from algae. Compared to palm oil, algae produce 731 times as much oil. The process of extracting oil from
algae is fairly easy. Microalgae are the best algae to use for biodiesel. Microalgae are organisms smaller than 2
mm in diameter that are able to do photosynthesis.
Microalgae are organisms smaller than 2 mm in diameter that are able to do photosynthesis. Seaweed and other
macroalgae are utilized less frequently to produce biodiesel. In addition to being faster and simpler to produce,
microalgae contain a lot more oil than macroalgae [10]. The cost of manufacturing, particularly the cost of raw
materials, is a significant barrier to the commercialization of biodiesel made from virgin oil as opposed to
diesel fuel derived from petroleum. One of the cost-effective sources for producing biodiesel as a green energy
source is used cooking oil [14]. Investors in biodiesel production plants will keep looking for financially viable
supplies of vegetable oil and animal fats that may be utilized to make biodiesel [13], as biodiesel is becoming a
more significant fuel source globally [15].
Among these animal fats like fish oil and chicken fat oil which is a feedstock that is reasonably priced in
comparison to other sources of oil and fat, including waste cooking oil [16]. However, base-catalyzed
transesterification combined with the high free-fatty acid (FFA) content of poultry fat results in by-products
such glycerin and soaps. One of the more effective and cost-effective methods to use it is to turn leftover
cooking oil into biodiesel. However, waste cooking oil, such as rice bran oil and waste fish oil, can be used as
objectives: to make a significant amount of biodiesel fuel, reducing the need for fuel derived from petroleum
and to investigate its proper qualities by identifying different properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Site: The experiment was carried out in the laboratory of Bioresource Science, Department of Biotechnology,
Institute of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and
University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Collection and extraction of waste cooking oil: Waste rice bran cooking oil (after the use of oil as frying)
and fish byproducts was collected from local restaurants and households in the University Malaya campus,
Kuala Lumpur, Malysia and Hail University, Saudi Arabia. Fish wastes were collected from the local fish
processing market and was heated up using incubator at 100°C for 6 hours to melt down. Applying filtration
technique, the melted fish fat was extracted which had been transesterified later on using alcohol and catalyst.
Transesterification: 0.5 g KOH was mixed with methanol and oil as the ratio of 4:1 and stirred properly for
20 min. The mixture of catalyst and methanol was poured into the filtered and extracted oil or fats in a conical
flask. The following reaction and steps were followed:
[15]
The reaction process is called transesterification. The
conical flask containing solution was shaken for 3 h by electric shaker at 300rpm.
Fig 1. Transesterification Process
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 510
Settling: After shaking the solution was kept for 15 h to settle the biodiesel and sediment layers clearly.
Separation of biodiesel: The biodiesel was separated from sedimentation by flask separator carefully.
Quantity sediment (glycerine, other elements, etc.) was measured.
Washing: Biodiesel was washed by 10% water until it was become clean.
Drying: Biodiesel was dried by using dryer and finally kept under the running fan for 12 h.
Storage: Biodiesel production was measured by using measuring cylinder, pH was measured and stored for
analysis.
Sample analysis: Produced biodiesel or FAME (fatty acid methyl ester) were analysed and viscosity, FAME
yield (%), Glycerine byproduct yield (%) and elements concentration (Fe, Pb, Cu, Al, Ca, Mg, Na, Zn, Si and
P) by multi-element analyzer were measured.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Biodiesel production (methyl ester) was found maximum in waste rice bran oil and then in fish oil. (Table 1).
Biodiesel production (methyl ester) was lower in rice bran oil than fish oil. However, glycerine yield (%) was
lower in rice bran and higher in fish oil. There was is a significant difference between them (Table 1). The
viscosity (mm²/s) value was lower in rice bran biodiesel than in fish biodiesel (Table 2). Acid value was lower
in rice bran oil than in fish oil bed biodiesel (Table 2).
Table 1. FAME analysis of biodiesel. Mean ± SE (n=5).
Feedstock and biofuel
FAME Conversion yield %
Glycerine yield (%)
Waste Rice bran biodiesel
Fish oil biodiesel
96.6± 0.19
93.2± 0.10
6.3± 0.05
9.0± 0.06
Table 2. Viscosity (mm²/s) and acid value of different FAMEs. Mean ± SE (n=5).
Feedstock and biofuel
Viscosity at 40 0C (mm²/s)
Acid value ( mgKOH/ml)
Waste Rice bran biodiesel
Fish oil biodiesel
4.2± 0.01
4.6± 0.03
0.35± 0.02
0.45± 0.02
Phosphorus, calcium and Magnesium were higher in both biodiesel compared to other elements in FAMEs
[Table 3]. However, the lower concentration was of Zn, Na, Cu, Al and Fe in both biodiesel FAMEs.
Table 3: Multi-element (chemical) content analysis in different FAME. Mean ± SE (n=5).
Waste rice bran biodiesel Content (ppm)
Fish byproducts oil biodiesel Content (ppm)
4.7± 0.014
3.0± 0.015
2.5± 0.013
2.0± 0.011
5.0± 0.015
3.2± 0.014
2.3± 0.010
1.6± 0.010
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 511
1.5± 0.010
2.0± 0.010
1.0± 0.015
0.80± 0.010
0.83± 0.010
0
1.0± 0.011
1.8± 0.010
2.0± 0.012
0.90± 0.011
0.85± 0.02
0
Although there was a less significant difference in FAME production (%) from fish and rice bran biodiesel.
Fig 1 shows the correlation between the biodiesel yield and glycerin yield in waste rice bran and fish
byproduct. In both biodiesel, increasing and decreasing trends were found in biodiesel and glycerin. When
biodiesel yield increases the glycerin yield decreases. So there was a strong relationship between them. Fig 2
shows biodiesel production from rice bran and fish byproducts (FAME after separation) biofuel (biodiesel).
Biodiesel Yield (%)
Fig. 1. Correlation between the biodiesel yield and glycerin yield in waste rice bran and fish byproduct.
Photographs show different sources (fish byproducts and rice bran oil biodiesel) of biodiesel production and
ester yield (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Photographs show biodiesel production from rice bran and fish byproducts, biodiesel (FAME after
separation) biofuel (biodiesel).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 512
The results show that biodiesel production can be possible from both waste rice bran and fish byrpducts oil.
Glycerine production was significantly higher in fish biodiesel than in rice bran oil. Sijtsma and Swaaf
[18]
stated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was a polyunsaturated fatty acid composed of 22 carbon atoms and
six double bonds that belonged to the so-called -3 group. They also reported that fish oil was the major source
of DHA, but alternatively it might be produced by using of microorganisms. Marine microorganisms might
contain large quantities of DHA and were considered a potential source of this important fatty acid. Some of
these organisms could be grown heterotrophically on organic substrates without light. It has been reported that
macro algae contain lipid content of 1.3-7.8% (dw) and could produce biodiesel. In addition in heterotrophic
condition lipid content can be more in algae and could produce more biodiesel
[19]
.
The majority of the commercial biodiesel from sunflower oil is manufactured using homogenous base catalysts
such as NaOH or KOH. The transesterification of used oil collected from the cafeterias at the University of
Guelph, Canada, using an acidic catalyst (H
2
SO
4
) and an alkaline catalyst (KOH) and was compared
[21]
. Two
types of used oils (partially hydrogenated soybean oil and margarine) were transesterified with methanol,
ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, and 2-ethoxyethanol
[21]
. It has been compared between two
catalysts such as KOH and a combination of barium and calcium acetate for the preparation of methyl esters
from waste cooking oil. It was found that all of the catalysts showed reasonable biodiesel production.
CONCLUSION
Waste cooking oil and fish byproducts oil are possible economical choices for biodiesel production, because of
their availability and low cost. Our results prove that biodiesel can be produced from these sources: waste rice
bran and fish byproducts oil (96.6 and 93.2%). Also, the highest glycerin was produced by using fish
byproducts. In this way, these sources can be used as an environmental recycling process and renewable
energy. Further research should be done to compare the ratio of biodiesel production from these sources.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial support for this project from Science Fund, Mosti, Malaysia and Hail University Deanship fund
is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. Goldemberg, J., 2000. World Energy Assessment, Preface.United Nations Development Programme,
new York, NY, USA.
2. Hossain, A.B.M.S. 2021. Fruit Bio-Waste Derived Bio-Ethanol Production and Bioelectricity
Generation as Renewable Energy. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 17 (3): 82-91.
3. Hossain, A.B.M.S., W.M.W. Yusoff, V.N. Veettil.
.
2019. Bioethanol Production from Fruit Biomass as
Bio-antiseptic and Bio-antifermenter: Its Chemical and Biochemical Properties. Journal of Applied
Sciences, 19 (4): 311-318.
4. Kulkarni, M.G. and A.K. Dalai, 2006. Waste cooking iol-an economical source for biodiesel: A review.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45: 2901-2913.
5. Klass, L.D., 1998. Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels and Chemicals, Academic Press, New York,
pp: 1-2.
6. Turkenburg, W.C., 2000. Renewable energy technologies. In: Goldemberg, J. (Ed). World Energy
Assessment, Preface. United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA, pp: 219-272.
7. Hossain, A.B.M.S., 2017. Utilization of Waste Sunflower Oil Biomass as Biodiesel: Its physical and
chemical properties as environmental recycling. Identification and Implementation. Advances in
Bioresearch 8 (5):264-271.
8. Lang, X., A.K. Dalai, N.N. Bakhshi, M.J. Reaney and P.B. Hertz, 2002. Preparation and
characterization of biodiesels from various Bio-Oils. Bioresour. Technol., 80: 53-62.
9. Spolaore, P., C. Joannis-Cassan, E. Duran and A. Isambert, 2006. Commercial applications of
microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 101: 87-96.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 513
10. Sharif, A.B.M.H, A.B. Nasrulhaq, H.A.M., Majid, S. Chandran and R. Zuliana, 2007. Biodiesel
production from waste cooking oil as environmental benefits and recycling process. A Review. Asia
Biofuel Conference Book. Dec. 11-13. Singapore.
11. Hall, D.O., H.E. Mynick and R.H. Williams, 1991. Cooling the greenhouse with bioenergy. Nature,
353: 11.
12. Macedo, I.D.C., 1990. Energy from biomass and wastes. Biomass Bioenergy, 3: 77-80.
13. Shay, E.G., 1993. Diesel fuel from vegetable oils: Status and Opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy, 4:
227-242.
14. Kulkarni, M. G. and Dalai, A. K., 2006. Waste cooking iol-an economical source for biodiesel: a
review. Ind.Eng. Chem. Res.45: 2901-2913.
15. Ginder, R and N. Paulson, 2006. The Growth and Direction of the Biodiesel Industry in the U.S.
Selected Paper. American Agricultural Economics Association Meeetings, Long Beach, CA.
16. Zhang, Y., M. Dubé, D. McLean and M. Kates, 2003. Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil:
2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresource Technology 90:229-240.
17. Mattingly, B., P. Manning, J. Voon, H. Himstedt, E. Clausen, M. Popp, and R. Babcock. 2004.
“Comparative Esterification of Agricultural Oils for Biodiesel Blending.” Final Report Award Number
MBTC-2052.
18. National Biodiesel Board, 2002. USA. Available in www.biodiesel.org
19. Sijtsma, L. and M.E. Swaaf, 2004. Biotechnological production and applications of the -3-
polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 64: 146-153.
20. Renaud, S. and J. Luong-Van, 2006. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of tropical
australian marine macroalgae. J. Applied Phycol., 18: 381-387.
21. Nye, M. J.; Williamson, T. W.; Deshpande, S.; Schrader, J. H.; Snively, W. H.; Yurkewich, T. P. ,
1983. Conversion of Used Frying Oil to Diesel Fuel by Transesterification: Preliminary Tests. J. Am.
Oil Chem. Soc. 60 (8): 1598-1601.
22. Al-Widyan, M. I.; Al-Shyoukh, A. O., 2002. Experimental Evaluation of the Transesterification of
Waste Palm Oil into Biodiesel. Bioresour. Technol. 85: 253-256.