INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 669
From Exclusion to Empowerment: Rethinking Digital
Transformation for Women Entrepreneurs
Nankyer Sarah Joseph,*., Mohammed Nasiru Yakubu
Department of Information Systems, School of IT and Computing, American University of Nigeria, Yola
Arden University, Middlemarch Business Park, Coventry CV3 4FJ
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.1010000052
Received: 01 October 2025; Accepted: 07 October 2025; Published: 03 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study examines how digital transformation shapes women entrepreneurs’ movement from exclusion to
empowerment within Nigeria’s evolving enterprise landscape. Guided by Affordance Theory and a Critical
Realist philosophical assumption, it explores how digital technologies such as social media, mobile payments,
and online marketplaces create possibilities that are only realized under specific atmosphere and institutional
conditions. Using a qualitative multiple-case study design, thirteen (N = 13) women entrepreneurs were
purposively selected across diverse sectors and settings. Data were collected through semi-structured open-
ended questions and analyzed through inductive coding, axial theming, and retroductive reasoning to uncover
the generative mechanisms linking context, affordance perception, and empowerment outcomes. Findings
reveal a stratified pattern of empowerment shaped by both enabling and constraining mechanisms. Working-
capital scarcity and infrastructure unreliability function as structural bottlenecks that limit the actualization of
digital affordances, while peer-based learning, training, and networked visibility mediate these constraints.
Algorithmic opacity and inconsistent platform governance emerged as hidden structures reinforcing unequal
visibility and dependence on paid promotion. Where enabling conditions aligned finance, connectivity, and
institutional support women experienced tangible empowerment outcomes such as increased market reach,
confidence, and decision autonomy. The study contributes by demonstrating that digital affordances are not
self-actualizing; they operate through layered mechanisms embedded in economic, technological, and socio-
cultural structures. Empirically, it offers contextual evidence of how women exercise agency within and
against these constraints. Practically, it recommends blended finance for working capital and data costs, peer-
driven digital training, and transparent platform governance to translate digital access into durable
empowerment.
Keywords: Women Entrepreneurs; Digital Transformation; Affordance Theory; Empowerment; Inclusion;
Nigeria.
INTRODUCTION
Digital technologies platform marketplaces, mobile money, social media marketing, and remote learning are
regularly framed as democratizing forces for entrepreneurship Kraus et al., 2018; Obschonka & Audretsch,
2019). Yet emerging evidence documents that women entrepreneurs often fail to reap the full benefits of
digitalization: disparities persist in revenue growth, market reach, (Ughetto et al., 2019) access to finance, and
sustainable scaling (McAdam et al., 2020). Increasingly, scholars contend that access to technology by itself is
insufficient for inclusion; instead, a conversion problem exists digital affordances become empowerment only
when mediated by enabling structures and individual/collective agency (Majchrzak, 2012)
In recent years, digital transformation’s role in empowering women entrepreneurs, specifically in Sub-Saharan
Africa, has gained increasing attention. The connection between entrepreneurship and digital technologies
presented several paths for fostering empowerment among women who traditionally have been marginalized in
the economic landscape. Women constitute an important part of the entrepreneurial system within this region
(Sub-Saharan Africa), yet they face various issues ranging from limited access to finance to societal norms that
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 670
constrain their economic participation (Mulu et al., 2021). Transformative digital technologies can influence
considerable changes in this context by providing women with the necessary tools to overcome the
multifaceted challenges they encounter.
In the realm of entrepreneurship, women are seriously underrepresented in Sub-Saharan Africa. This has often
been linked to the systemic socio-economic barriers and cultural expectations that give precedence to
traditional roles and expectations over entrepreneurial endeavors (Al‐Dajani et al., 2015). To overcome these
barriers, there must be an understanding that implementing digital tools and platforms can empower women
with improved access to resources, information, and networks that are required for fruitful entrepreneurship
(Mulu et al., 2021; Peter & Orser, 2024). These digital solutions will help facilitate market access as well as
enhance visibility for women entrepreneurs, thus ensuring that they contribute to their overall economic
empowerment (Peter & Orser, 2024).
This research adopts a qualitative design to explore the experiences of women entrepreneurs in Sub-Saharan
Africa as they navigate the domain of digital transformation. Using semi-structured questionnaires, this study
aims at gathering rich and contextual data that reflects their unique perspectives on empowerment through
digital engagement. It is envisaged that the thematic analysis of the collected data will enlighten the ways in
which digital transformation can foster inclusion, thus allowing women entrepreneurs to overcome the
limitations and meaningfully contribute to economic development.
Research objectives and contribution
This study pursues three objectives:
1. Theoretically: Clarify how digital affordances interact with enabling structures and agency to produce
inclusion or exclusion for women entrepreneurs.
2. Empirically: Provide a rigorous qualitative multiple-study design n=13 women entrepreneurs), ready-
to-deploy instruments, and an analytic pipeline to test pathways from affordance to empowerment.
3. Practically: Offer evidence-informed recommendations for platforms, intermediaries, and policymakers
focused on converting access into sustained empowerment.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Digital transformation is increasingly reshaping global business landscapes, offering significant opportunities
for women entrepreneurs to overcome traditional barriers (Group., 2022) Despite these potential benefits,
women often face challenges in accessing and leveraging digital tools effectively (Canton, 2021). Addressing
these disparities is crucial for fostering inclusive economic growth and empowerment (Kiril, 2020).
Literature on women's entrepreneurship has observed substantial growth in both quantity and scope, especially
in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. This growth is attributed to an increased appreciation of the issues faced
by women entrepreneurs in emerging economies. This has prompted researchers to advocate for a deeper
understanding of socio-economic and cultural factors that influence female entrepreneurship (Henry et al.,
2015; Woldesenbet et al., 2024). Comprehensive studies highlight the importance of context in
entrepreneurship, especially in regard to how different socio-cultural and economic environments shape
women's experiences in business (Langevang & Gough, 2012).
Affordance theory, empowerment, and feminist perspectives
Affordance theory (Gibson, 2014) has been adapted in Information Systems (IS) to explain how technological
properties enable potential actions but also require social and organizational contexts for actualization
(Majchrzak, 2012). For women entrepreneurs, affordances such as remote market access, low-cost marketing
or mobile payments are opportunities that only become empowering when perceived and leveraged contingent
on training, legitimacy, and institutional supports.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 671
Cyber-feminist scholarship and digital justice frameworks complicate simplistic technology-as-solution
narratives by foregrounding power structures, data sovereignty, and design choices that can reproduce
inequalities (Consalvo, 2012) (McAdam et al., 2020) (Floridi, 2018). Combining affordance theory with
feminist and institutional lenses allows us to examine both individual-level agency and meso-level structural
enablers.
In summary, literature seems to suggest that a holistic approach is required in relation to women's
entrepreneurship. This approach must take into consideration digital transformation as a multifaceted tool for
empowerment. It should also encompass policies that are supportive, educational initiatives, and a balanced
understanding of socio-cultural context which defines women's entrepreneurial experiences. This study
believes that this will be essential in reshaping the narrative around women entrepreneurs from exclusion to
empowerment through digital transformation.
METHOD
We employed purposive, maximum-variation sampling to capture heterogeneity in sector, technology
intensity, years in business, and urbanicity. Thirteen (N=13) women entrepreneurs met inclusion criteria
(owner/manager; revenue-generating enterprise; used at least one digital tool for business in the past 12
months).
Data were collected with a semi-structured questionnaire covering business profile; digital tools and
affordances; outcomes; barriers and constraints; supports and networks; platform governance and automation;
agency and strategies; and recommendations. The instrument underwent expert review and light piloting for
content clarity. The complete instrument (column-labeled items) is reproduced in Appendix A.
For analysis, we combined inductive open coding with axial theming into Barriers, Enablers, and
Empowerment Outcomes. We then used retroductive reasoning a Critical Realist strategy to articulate
plausible mechanisms linking contextual conditions (e.g., capital, power/data, norms) to affordance perception,
action, and outcomes. Cross-case pattern matching assessed regularities and divergences. Credibility was
strengthened via a second-pass consistency check and theme summaries validated against the raw responses.
Code counts inform salience but do not substitute for explanation; interpretive priority is given to mechanistic
links supported by situated quotations.
RESULTS
We present findings as interlinked mechanisms rather than isolated themes. Across the 13 cases, digital tools
were widely used (WhatsApp/Instagram/Facebook predominated), but benefits were contingent on capital,
connectivity, and platform governance. Below, we trace how barriers and enablers interact to shape
empowerment outcomes.
1. Finance Infrastructure Visibility Working-capital scarcity constrained inventory, ad spend, and
utilities (data/power), which in turn limited algorithmic visibility and conversion. Finance thus acts as an
upstream bottleneck that propagates into weaker online presence. “More women centered support in terms of
startup funds and structural support. 8. I have used a lot of online/offline classes on marketing, finance and
content creation to build my business. And I have also formed good relationships with other vendors…”
2. Infrastructure Reliability as a Gatekeeper Unreliable electricity and mobile data interrupted service delivery
and customer engagement, diluting returns from otherwise effective social commerce tactics. Women adapted
by batching uploads, using generators when feasible, or shifting to lower-bandwidth channels; nonetheless,
outages repeatedly broke sales flows. Yes Facebook gives me the most leverage as I have a supportive
network there.” Yes, some include platforms payment and also network issues.”
3. Trust, Safety, and Transaction Risk Fear of fraud and low trust in dispute mechanisms suppressed uptake of
online payments and cross-city sales. These perceptions reduced willingness to experiment with features like
prepayment or deliveries beyond known networks. 6. Challenges will include time to be posting regularly. 7.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 672
My account was hacked/suspended.” Some of the challenges I face include the cost of constant internet data,
which is high and affects how often I can post or engage customers online. Time management is also a…”
4. Training and Peer Know-how Convert Features into Practice Where women accessed practical guidance
often informally through peer’s platform features translated into sales (better product photography, timing of
posts, customer messaging scripts). Training mitigated fear and helped substitute organic tactics for paid ads
when budgets were tight. “There should be discounts on those training cause not every can afford even if they
know how valuable it is “Some trainings did help and some social media platforms.”
5. Platform Visibility and Governance Participants perceived that paid promotion improved reach, yet the rules
of visibility (ranking, verification, occasional suspensions) were opaque. This opacity made outcomes feel
contingent on factors beyond effort, especially for those unable to finance consistent ads.
WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook for marketing and sales. Invoice bookkeeping app to track orders and
payments” “WhatsApp communities”
6. Suspensions, Verification, and Appeals A subset reported account challenges (verification hurdles, content
takedowns, or brief suspensions), with limited guidance for appeal. Such events had disproportionate impact
on small inventories and time-sensitive sales. “Social media and local (home), I advertise on WhatsApp to be
precise and payments are wired through bank” “It’s hard to locate customers that find what i sell valuable
enough for the price am giving (calculated price), i have never experience account suspension.”
7. Conditional Empowerment Outcomes When affordances were supportedcapital for stock and data,
reliable power, minimal governance friction women reported greater visibility, steadier sales, and confidence
engaging new markets. Where support was absent, outcomes plateaued despite high effort.
Sunshine basket Nigeria, online grocery store, 4-year-old, main customers are those who want farm fresh
produce at great prices.” WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook for marketing and sales. Invoice bookkeeping
app to track orders and payments”
8. Cross-Case Mechanism Recurring mechanism: (M1) Working-capital scarcity (Bottleneck) Low ad/infra
spend (Effect) Limited algorithmic visibility & intermittent engagement (Outcome) Lower conversion.
Mitigators: (E1) training + peer know-how for organic reach; (E2) low platform friction (verification in place;
no suspensions). Mitigators: (E1) training + peer know-how for organic reach; (E2) low platform friction
(verification in place; no suspensions).
Table 1:Participant business profiles (self-described)
ID
Business profile (self-described)
P01
Sunshine basket Nigeria, online grocery store, 4-year-old, main customers are those who want farm fresh
produce at great prices.
P02
I sell kitchen and home items, been doing that for almost a decade and my customers are mostly women
P03
I own a chemist and sell skincare products. I have been operating for 5 years. Both men, women and
children
P04
Food and drink
P05
I sell Beauty/Makeup products. 5 years and counting in a product-based business. My target customers
are upcoming Makeup artists and beauty
P06
I sell cakes and I make them from home and my customers are basically anyone who has a celebration -
birthdays, weddings, anniversaries ,…
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 673
P07
I'm a retailer of Garnier, Loris and Avon products. I have been selling since 2011, but registered my
business in 2021. My customers are…
P08
"Elle’s Beauty Hub is a perfume business that sells high-quality designer oil perfumes, Arabian oud, and
custom fragrance blends. We…
P09
We sell skincare. Operating over a year, our customers are individuals with skin problems that need skin
solutions
P10
We are into value added argic products
P11
My business involves marketing and sales of household items such as food warmers, coolers, etc. My
customers are residents of Yola and its…
P12
Am into outdoor events especially for kids. I organize birthday parties for kids, giving them a colorful
birthday making their dreams of
P13
I sale cooperate shoes for women
Table 2:Salience by theme (number of participants mentioning theme)
Theme
Participants mentioning (N=13)
Platforms/Visibility/Ads
12
Outcomes/Empowerment
11
Training/Know-how/Peer Support
8
Payments/Logistics
7
Infrastructure (Power/Data/Connectivity)
5
Finance/Working Capital
3
Governance/Suspension/Verification
3
Trust/Safety/Fraud
2
DISCUSSION
These findings within a stratified ontology where events, mechanisms, and deep structures interact are
observable events missed sales, unstable connectivity, and fluctuating online visibility belong to the empirical
layer. Beneath them lie causal mechanisms such as capital scarcity, infrastructural fragility, and algorithmic
control, which generate or constrain these experiences. At the deep structural level, the political economy of
digital platforms and utilities determines who can consistently convert digital participation into economic
empowerment.
Within this layered reality, affordances low-cost marketing, instant messaging, and mobile payments represent
real possibilities that do not automatically translate into outcomes. Their actualization depends on the interplay
of three enabling conditions: material resources, infrastructural stability, and interpretive capability. Where
these align, women translate digital features into economic visibility and confidence; where they fracture,
affordances remain latent.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 674
While a feminist reading exposes how these mechanisms reproduce existing hierarchies. Platform visibility is
governed by opaque algorithms that reward liquidity and paid promotion, embedding gendered disadvantage
within digital architectures. The invisible labor of maintaining online presence photography, engagement,
content curation extends women’s unpaid work into the digital realm, blurring entrepreneurial autonomy with
constant availability. Yet, through reflexive agency, many participants negotiate these asymmetries by
leveraging peer networks and local trust systems to sustain participation despite structural exclusions.
Empirically, the study reaffirms that digital empowerment is conditional, not universal. It arises when social
and material support enable women to act upon technological affordances within constraining contexts.
Conceptually, this reinforces a Critical Realist-Feminist synthesis: empowerment emerges through the partial
activation of real but contingent affordances embedded in unequal structures.
Practically, three mechanisms warrant targeted intervention:
1. Financial and infrastructural reinforcement blended capital and stable utilities to sustain online activity;
2. Situated learning ecosystems peer-driven training that transforms potential affordances into capability;
3. Platform accountability transparent governance of algorithms, verification, and dispute resolution.
Together, these measures strengthen the conversion of digital access into actualized empowerment, moving
from technological inclusion to structural transformation.
Contributions
Conceptual: mechanism-based account of how digital affordances convert to empowerment under Nigerian
conditions.
Empirical: pilot, context-rich evidence with transparent instrument and salience counts (Table 2) to support
replication and scale-up.
Practical: financeinfrastructuregovernance levers and peer-centered training to improve conversion of
access into outcomes.
Limitations
Small, purposive sample (N=13) limits generalizability. Self-reported data introduce recall/desirability bias.
Platform processes (ranking, down-ranking, fee changes) were not directly observed; inferences rely on
consistent patterns in accounts. Electricity and data costs are location-specific. These motivate a preregistered
next wave and mixed-methods extensions.
CONCLUSION
This study examined the digital transformation experiences of women entrepreneurs in Sub-Saharan Africa,
highlighting both the barriers that perpetuate exclusion and the enablers that foster empowerment. The findings
demonstrate that while digital platforms and training opportunities hold significant potential, their impact is
mediated by finance, infrastructure, and socio-cultural norms. By applying Affordance Theory, the study
advances theoretical understanding of how digital resources are differentially actualized in marginalized
contexts. Empirically, it provides evidence of the interplay between exclusionary structures and empowering
affordances in women’s entrepreneurship. Practically, it emphasizes the urgency of affordable infrastructure,
inclusive training, and supportive policies to translate digital transformation into genuine empowerment. In
conclusion, moving from exclusion to empowerment requires not only technological innovation but also
structural change that acknowledges and addresses the layered realities of women entrepreneurs in the Nigeria.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 675
REFERENCES
1. Adegbile, A. S., Ogundana, O. M., & Adesola, S. (2024). Gender-based policies and women’s
entrepreneurship: an fsQCA analysis of sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 30(7), 1811-1837.
2. Dajani, H., Carter, S., Shaw, E., & Marlow, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship among the displaced and
dispossessed: Exploring the limits of emancipatory entrepreneuring. British Journal of Management,
26(4), 713-730.
3. Canton, H. (2021). In The Europa directory of international organizations. United nations conference
on trade and developmentunctad.,
4. Consalvo, M. (2012). Confronting toxic gamer culture: A challenge for feminist game studies scholars.
Ada: . A Journal of Gender,, 1(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7264/N33X84KH (New Media, and
Technology, )
5. Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection
Regulation. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 376(2133). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081
6. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The theory of affordances:(1979). In The people, place, and space reader.
Routledge., (pp. 56-60).
7. Group., W. B. (2022). Global economic prospects, . World Bank Publications.
8. Kiril, K. O. S. S. E. V. (2020). OECD/INFE 2020 international survey of adult financial literacy.
9. Kraus, S., Palmer, C., Kailer, N., Kallinger, F. L., & Spitzer, J. (2018). Digital entrepreneurship.
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2018-0425
10. Majchrzak, A., & Markus, M. L. . (2012). Technology affordances and constraints in management
information systems (MIS). , . Encyclopedia of Management Theory,(Ed: E. Kessler). (Sage
Publications, Forthcoming.)
11. McAdam, M., Crowley, C., & Harrison, R. T. (2020). Digital girl: cyberfeminism and the emancipatory
potential of digital entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 349-
362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00301-2
12. Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2019). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a
new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-
00202-4
13. Ughetto, E., Rossi, M., Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. E. (2019). Female entrepreneurship in the digital
era. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00298-8
Ethical Considerations and Approval
This study was conducted in full compliance with established ethical standards for research involving human
participants. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the American University of
Nigeria; after undergoing the ethical certification review with the certificates number Record ID 3185315 and
Record ID 37009720 and informed consent was secured from all participants prior to data collection.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, that could have influenced the
conduct or outcomes of this research.
Data Set Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available and will be made available when
needed.
Appendix A. Semi-Structured Questionnaire
1. Section 1 Background 1. Tell me briefly about your business: what you sell/provide, how long you have
been operating, who your customers are.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 676
2. Section 2 Digital tools & affordances 2. Which digital tools do you use for your business? (prompt:
social media, marketplaces, messaging, mobile money). 3. For each, describe how you use it (marketing, sales,
payments, sourcing). Can you give a recent concrete example?
3. Section 3 Outcomes 4. How have these tools affected your sales, customers, or costs? Can you show or
describe any evidence? 5. Have you seen any changes in who buys from you or how often?
4. Section 4 Barriers & constraints 6. What challenges do you face when using these tools? (skills, cost,
time, family duties, platform fees). 7. Have you experienced any unfair treatment online (e.g., harassment,
account suspension)? How was it resolved?
5. Section 5 Supports & networks 8. What training, finance, mentorship, or networks have helped you?
Which were most useful? Which were missing? 9. Are you part of groups, cooperatives, or peer networks that
support your use of digital tools?
6. Section 6 Platform governance & automation 10. Do you understand how platform algorithms affect
visibility? Have you experienced automatic decisions that impacted your business (ranking, suspension)?
Describe.
7. Section 7 Agency & strategies 11. What strategies or adaptations have you used to grow online despite
barriers? (hours, family support, side jobs). 12. Have you collaborated with other women entrepreneurs? What
worked?
8. Section 8 Recommendations 13. If you could change one thing about platforms, training, or policy to
help women succeed, what would it be?
9. Closing: Thank you. Is there anything else you want to add? Would you be willing to be contacted for
follow-up clarification?