To do this, it requires an automatic sentiment analysis application, an inventory management module for the
employees and an easy to use ordering interface by the customers. Still on the same issue, the users and the
technical respondents are in agreement with the acceptability and usefulness of the application in the ISO 25010
evaluation format.
The study is significant to both store owners and the application users as it develops a convenient design of
integrated ordering and inventory system with intelligent feedback analysis. It saves time in monitoring
inventory, decreases error in order taking and gives a rich customer satisfaction information.
CONCLUSION
The evaluation findings showed that both groups rated the system highly with respect to all the ISO 25010
quality characteristics, functionality, reliability, efficiency, usability and portability with weighted means
between 3.4 and 3.6 that is construed to be Strongly Agree.
Even though the level of consensus across both categories is good with respect to how the system is performing,
the users appeared to rate it highly in areas that covered ease of navigation and capability to accomplish the
things that needed to be done though the technical scores are lower and yet high in some areas that relate to
technical optimization and flexibility of the system. This type of similarity of scores indicates that the system is
user friendly and even technically sound enough to meet the needs of the end-users and even experts. And
therefore, it is said to be highly acceptable for deployment.
RECOMMENDATION
Future researchers ought to routinely review consumer reviews and ask participants to flag the more challenging
ones. They can then further train the LSTM using this labeled data. The results should become more reliable as
a result. Additionally, look for customer comments where it's difficult to infer the sentiment. Ask someone to
read those comments and write down what they think. Include this data when training the LSTM. By doing this,
bias will be reduced and accurate results will be obtained.
REFERENCES
1. Wu, Xia, and Tian (2025). AI-Driven Sentiment Analytics: Unlocking Business Value in the E-
Commerce Landscape. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08738
2. Sahagun, Flores, and Jocson (2022). Utilizing Google Map Reviews and Sentiment Analysis: Knowing
Customer Experience in Coffee Shops. The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and
Development, 1(2), 2022. https://zenodo.org/records/7613855
3. Mashayekhy, L., Salamat, A., & Kordi, M. (2022). Impact of Internet of Things (IoT) on inventory
management: A literature survey. Logistics, 6(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020033
4. Hossain et al. (2020). SentiLSTM: A Deep Learning Approach for Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant
Reviews
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350937855_SentiLSTM_A_Deep_Learning_Approach_for_S
entiment_Analysis_of_Restaurant_Reviews
5. Arora, A., Sharma, M., Chen, Y., Wang, S., & Zhang, W. (2021). Personalization in personalized
marketing: Trends and ways forward. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102395.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102395
6. Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives.
Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 14(1), 1–101. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000066
7. Smith, T., & Johnson, L. (2019). Customer experience personalization via sentiment feedback. Harvard
Business Review, 97(4), 78–85.
8. Hochreiter and Schmidhuber (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.
https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
9. Tolentino (2022). Milktea Shops: Consumer Satisfaction and Perception To Their Marketing Strategy.
https://www.scribd.com/document/509090440/MilkTea-Shop1
10. Elnagar, A., Khalifa, Y. S., & Einea, O. (2020). Hotel Arabic-reviews dataset construction for sentiment