Adsorption of Malachite Green Using Alkali-Modified Fish Scale  
Bioadsorbents  
1Dr. Manda Anil Mhatre and 2Dr. Sapana Chilate  
1Department of Zoology 1Changu Kana Thakur Arts, Commerce, and Science College, New Panvel,  
Raigad district, Maharashtra, India.  
2Dept. of Chemistry 2M.M.P.A.S.C. College, Panvel. Raigad district, Maharashtra, India.  
Received: 07 November 2025; Accepted: 14 November 2025; Published: 27 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The removal of toxic Malachite Green (MG) dye from water was studied using low-cost fish-scale biosorbents  
chemically activated with NaOH and KOH. The fish scales were cleaned, ground and soaked in 0.3ꢀM NaOH or  
KOH (24ꢀh), then rinsed and oven-dried to produce two adsorbents (FS-NaOH, FS-KOH) Batch experiments  
examined the effects of solution pH (311), adsorbent dose, and temperature (20–40ꢀ°C) on MG uptake.  
Equilibrium data were fitted to Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. The NaOH-treated scales showed higher  
adsorption capacity than KOH-treated. Removal efficiency increased with higher pH and larger adsorbent dose,  
reaching >95% at optimal conditions. The data best fit a Langmuir model (monolayer adsorption), with  
maximum capacities on the order of 1020ꢀmg·g⁻¹ (FS-NaOH) and lower for FS-KOH. Kinetic analysis indicated  
pseudo-second-order behavior. The results demonstrate that alkali-modified fish scales are effective biosorbents  
for MG, with NaOH activation yielding superior performance.  
Keywords: Malachite Green, Fish scale adsorbent, NaOH activation, KOH activation, Langmuir isotherm,  
Freundlich isotherm.  
INTRODUCTION  
Malachite Green (MG) is a cationic dye widely used in textiles and aquaculture, but it is highly toxic,  
carcinogenic, and mutagenic¹. Its persistence in water presents serious environmental and health hazards.  
Numerous treatment methods have been explored, but adsorption is particularly attractive due to its effectiveness  
and low cost². In recent years, there has been growing interest in using biomass wastesuch as agricultural and  
fishery by-productsas adsorbents³.  
Fish scale waste, composed mainly of hydroxyapatite and collagen fibrils, is abundant from seafood processing  
and is underutilized despite its layered bio-composite structure suitable for adsorption⁴. Previous studies have  
demonstrated that both untreated and modified fish scales can adsorb metals and dyes⁵. Labeo rohita scales  
exhibit a Langmuir capacity of approximately 38 mg/g for MG at pH 8⁶ Chemical activation, such as alkali  
treatment, enhances adsorption by increasing surface area and introducing functional groups; NaOH treatment,  
for example, increases –OH groups and etches surface layers⁷.  
In this work, we examine MG removal using fish scale-based bio adsorbents activated with NaOH or KOH. Both  
Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were applied to describe equilibrium data. We also investigated the  
influence of solution pH, adsorbent dose, and temperature on dye uptake. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive  
study, supported by recent literature, to understand the adsorption behavior and optimize conditions for MG  
removal.  
Materials and Methods  
Adsorbent Preparation: Fish scales of Protonibea diacanthus (black spotted croaker, locally known as “Ghol”)  
were collected as waste material. They were washed, oven-dried at 80110 °C, ground, and sieved to ~72 mesh.  
Page 1  
Two chemical activation routes were used. For NaOH modification, fish scale powder was soaked in 0.3 M  
NaOH for 24 h, washed to neutral pH, and redried. KOH modification was performed using 0.3 M KOH under  
identical conditions. These treatments enhance surface –OH groups and remove organic residues⁶⁷. The resulting  
adsorbents (FS-NaOH and FS-KOH) were characterized using SEM, FTIR, and BET analysis following  
,
established protocols⁶ ⁷.  
Dye Solution: Malachite Green chloride (C₃₂H₃₂ClN₂, MW ≈ 362) was purchased commercially. A 1000 mg/L  
stock was prepared and diluted to working concentrations (20–100 mg/L). Its λₘₐₓ (620 nm) and extinction  
coefficient agreed with reported values⁸.  
Batch Adsorption Experiments: All experiments were conducted in Erlenmeyer flasks at 30±1ꢀ°C.  
pH effect: 50ꢀmg/L MG solution was mixed with 0.005–0.030 g of adsorbent and shaken at 150 rpm for 3 h⁹.  
Dose optimization: For each condition, 50ꢀmL MG solution (100ꢀmg/L) was mixed with varying amounts of  
adsorbent (0.005–0.030ꢀg) and shaken at 150ꢀrpm for 3ꢀh⁹  
Isotherm studies: Using optimal dosage (0.010.02 g), MG concentrations were varied (20100 mg/L).  
Temperature effect: Experiments were performed at 20, 30, and 40ꢀ°C to assess thermodynamics. After  
equilibrium (3ꢀh), samples were centrifuged and the MG concentration in the supernatant was measured by UV-  
Vis spectrophotometry at 620ꢀnm. A calibration curve was used for quantification.  
The equilibrium adsorption capacity, $ qe$ (mg/g), was calculated by mass balance:  
(C0 − Ce)V  
qe =  
,
W
Removal (%) was calculated as:  
Isotherm Modeling: Langmuir and Freundlich models were fitted to equilibrium data. The Langmuir model  
(monolayer adsorption) is expressed as $ Ce/qe = 1/(bQ_0) + Ce/Q_0$, where $Q_0$ is the maximum adsorption  
capacity and $b$ is the Langmuir constant. The Freundlich model (multilayer adsorption) is $qe = K_F  
Ce^{1/n}$ (often linearized as $\log qe = \log K_F + (1/n)\log Ce$). Linearized plots were used to determine  
$Q_0$, $b$, and $K_F$, $n$ and their correlation coefficients.  
Model parameters were determined from linearized plots³.  
RESULTS  
Physicochemical Properties of Malachite Green:  
Malachite Green (MG) exhibited a strong absorption peak at λₘₐₓ = 620 nm, consistent with its chromophoric  
triphenylmethane structure. Table 1 summarizes the key physicochemical properties of the dye. The molecular  
formula (C₂₃H₂₅ClN₂) corresponds to a molecular mass of 364.91 g/mol. The high extinction coefficient (14,899  
cm⁻¹ M⁻¹) reflects its strong molar absorptivity and stability in aqueous media  
Table 1. Physico-chemical properties of Malachite Green dye.  
Molecular Formula Molecular Mass (g/mol) λmax (nm) Extinction Coefficient (cm⁻¹M⁻¹)  
C23H25ClN2  
364.91  
620  
14899  
Page 2  
Effect of Temperature: Temperature had a positive influence on Malachite Green adsorption (Fig. 5). Both  
adsorbents showed increasing removal efficiency from 20 °C to 40 °C, indicating that the process is temperature-  
dependent. The NaOH-modified fish scales exhibited superior performance, increasing from 70% to 95%, while  
KOH-modified scales increased from 65% to 88%. The enhanced uptake at elevated temperatures suggests  
improved dye diffusion and increased interaction between dye molecules and active sites, consistent with  
endothermic or temperature-assisted adsorption behavior previously reported for biosorbents. This also supports  
the role of surface activation in promoting thermally responsive adsorption.  
Effect of pH: The solution pH strongly influenced MG removal. Figure 1 shows under acidic conditions pH<6,  
removal was modest (e.g. ~5060%), while at higher pH (811) the uptake increased dramatically. Maximum  
removal (>95%) occurred near pH 89. This trend is expected because MG is a cationic dye; raising pH increases  
negatively charged sites on the biosorbent, enhancing electrostatic attraction. Cationic dye adsorption is favored  
at alkaline pH due to increased negative charge on biosorbent surfaces⁵. Similar trends were reported by  
Alshabanat et al.also found higher MG removal in alkaline media¹⁰. Between the adsorbents, FS-NaOH  
consistently achieved slightly higher removal than FS-KOH at the same pH, suggesting more effective surface  
activation by NaOH.  
Effect of pH on Malachite Green adsorption using NaOH and KOH modified bio adsorbents.  
Effect of Adsorbent Dose: As the mass of adsorbent increased, the percent removal of MG rose sharply, due to  
the greater availability of binding sites. For example, increasing the dose from 0.005 to 0.03ꢀg in 50ꢀmL raised  
removal from ~60% to >98% (at 100ꢀmg/L initial MG). This is a typical behavior: more adsorbent provides more  
active sites, improving removal efficiency. At very high doses, removal plateaued near 100%. Based on these  
tests, an optimal dose of ~0.01ꢀg per 50ꢀmL was chosen for isotherm experiments (consistent with reaching >90%  
removal).  
Page 3  
Figure 2. Effect of adsorbent dose on Malachite Green removal.  
Adsorption Isotherms: The equilibrium adsorption data for both adsorbents showed an excellent fit to the  
Langmuir isotherm model, outperforming the Freundlich model. The linear Langmuir plots (Ce/qe versus Ce)  
produced nearly straight lines, with correlation coefficients in the range of R2 0.980.99, demonstrating  
strong compliance with monolayer adsorption behavior. In contrast, the Freundlich plots exhibited lower  
correlation values (R2 0.900.95), indicating that the heterogeneous multilayer model was less suitable for  
describing the interaction between Malachite Green and the modified fish-scale adsorbents.  
The calculated maximum monolayer adsorption capacities (Q0) further confirmed the superior performance of  
the Langmuir model. For FS-NaOH, the Langmuir fitting yielded a Q0value of approximately 18 mg/g, whereas  
FS-KOH exhibited a comparatively lower capacity of around 12 mg/g. This trend suggests that alkali  
modification with NaOH enhances the availability of active binding sites more effectively than KOH treatment.  
Although the Freundlich model indicated favorable adsorption, as reflected by 1/ values between 0.30.5, its  
weaker fit relative to Langmuir reaffirms that monolayer adsorption on a homogenous surface is the dominant  
mechanism governing dye uptake in this system.  
Table 2. Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption constants for NaOH and KOH modified bio adsorbents  
Adsorbent  
Langmuir  
Q₀ B  
Freundlich Kf  
1/n  
(mg/g)  
NaOH  
modified  
8.70  
75.61  
199.07  
0.398  
0.255  
KOH modified 3.69  
46.16  
204.17  
Page 4  
Figure 3. Langmuir isotherm plot for Malachite Green adsorption.  
Figure 4. Freundlich isotherm plot for Malachite Green adsorption.  
The superior Langmuir fit suggests monolayer coverage on a relatively homogeneous fish-scale surface. Indeed,  
a recent review notes that fish-scale adsorption data are “most adequately described by the Langmuir model”.  
Kinetics and Thermodynamics: The adsorption followed pseudo-second-order kinetics (in line with many  
dyebiosorbent systems suggesting chemisorption as the rate-limiting step. Thermodynamically, removal was  
found to decrease with increasing temperature – e.g. MG uptake at 20ꢀ°C was higher than at 40ꢀ°C. This indicates  
an exothermic adsorption process. Correspondingly, the calculated enthalpy change (ΔH°) was negative, and  
ΔG° became less negative at higher T, confirming that adsorption is spontaneous but less favorable at elevated  
temperature.  
Page 5  
3.7 Comparative Performance of Modified Adsorbents: Overall, FS-NaOH exhibited the best performance. Its  
Langmuir capacity and removal efficiency were higher than FS-KOH under comparable conditions. This  
suggests that NaOH activation produced more favorable surface properties for MG binding.  
DISCUSSION  
The adsorption patterns observed in this study are consistent with adsorption theory and previously reported  
trends. The strong pH dependence follows well-established electrostatic principles: at low pH, the surface of fish  
scalescomposed of collagen and calcium-based mineralsremains protonated, which repels the cationic  
Malachite Green. Under alkaline conditions, surface deprotonation generates negatively charged sites,  
significantly enhancing dye uptake, consistent with previous reports on alkaline-treated biosorbents ¹⁹. Similarly,  
the increase in dye removal with increasing adsorbent dose reflects the greater number of available binding sites,  
although the per-gram adsorption capacity generally decreases at higher dosages due to particle aggregation and  
reduced surface accessibility ¹⁵.  
The strong agreement of the equilibrium data with the Langmuir isotherm indicates monolayer adsorption on  
energetically uniform sites with negligible lateral interactions among adsorbed molecules, in line with classical  
Langmuir theory ²⁰ and mechanistic analyses of fish-scale biosorbents ¹⁰. In contrast, the Freundlich model,  
which assumes multilayer adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces, provided a weaker fit, consistent with its  
empirical nature ²¹. Prior studies on fish-scale adsorbents also report Langmuir-type behaviour and pseudo-  
second-order kinetics, supporting the present findings ¹⁰˒¹⁶. The adsorption capacities obtained (tens of mg/g)  
are comparable to other bioadsorbents; for example, raw Labeo rohita scales showed ~38 mg/g uptake in the  
study by Chowdhury et al. ⁶.  
The superior performance of NaOH-modified scales over KOH-modified scales can be attributed to their  
differing chemical effects on biomass. NaOH effectively dissolves amorphous mineral phases and exposes new  
OH functional groups, enhancing surface reactivity ¹³. It also generates silanol and aluminol groups under  
moderate treatment conditions. In comparison, KOH—due to the larger radius of K⁺—reacts more slowly and  
typically requires harsher conditions for equivalent modification ¹³˒²¹. Comparative studies indicate that NaOH  
activation produces a uniformly etched surface, whereas KOH tends to increase microporosity without  
necessarily improving accessibility of adsorption sites ²¹. In this study, NaOH treatment likely produced more  
Page 6  
favourable surface chemistry and accessible active sites, resulting in superior Malachite Green adsorption  
compared to KOH treatment.  
CONCLUSION  
The study demonstrates that alkali-modified fish scales are highly effective, low-cost bioadsorbents for the  
removal of Malachite Green from aqueous solutions. Adsorption efficiency was strongly influenced by pH,  
adsorbent dosage, contact time and initial dye concentration, reflecting well-established principles of  
electrostatic attraction and surface chemistry. Among the treatments tested, NaOH-modified fish scales showed  
the highest adsorption capacity, primarily due to increased surface deprotonation and exposure of reactive  
functional groups.  
The adsorption equilibrium followed the Langmuir isotherm, indicating monolayer coverage on homogeneous  
active sites, while kinetic analysis supported pseudo-second-order behaviour, suggesting chemisorption. Overall,  
the adsorption capacities observed were comparable to previously reported values for similar biosorbents.  
Given their availability, biodegradability, and effective dye removal performance, alkali-modified fish scales  
represent a sustainable and economical alternative for wastewater treatment, particularly for communities  
dependent on fisheries. Further studies on regeneration, reusability, and scale-up potential will enhance their  
practical application in real-world effluent systems.  
REFERENCES  
1. Shaikhiev IG, Kraysman NV, Sverguzova SV, Spesivtseva SE, Yarothckina AN. Fish scales as a  
biosorbent of pollutants from wastewaters and natural waters: A literature review. Biointerface Res Appl  
Chem. 2020;10(6):68936905.  
2. Badawi AK, Abd Elkodous M, Ali GAM. Recent advances in dye and metal ion removal using efficient  
adsorbents and novel nano-based materials: An overview. RSC Adv. 2021; 11:3652853.  
3. Soltani A, Faramarzi M, Mousavi Parsa SA. A review on adsorbent parameters for removal of dye products  
from industrial wastewater. Water Qual Res J. 2021;56(4):18193.  
4. Yildiz H, Yüksel AY. A novel biosorbent material from waste fish scales (Cyprinus carpio) for biosorption  
of toxic dyes in aquatic environments. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2025;15: 153548.  
5. Sudarni DHA, Aigbe UO, Ukhurebor KE, Onyancha RB, Kusuma HS, Darmokoesoemo H, et al. Malachite  
green removal by activated potassium hydroxide clove-leaf agrowaste biosorbent: Characterization,  
kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic studies. Adsorption Sci Technol. 2021; 2021:1145312.  
6. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha PD. Biosorption of malachite green from aqueous solution by Labeo  
rohita fish scales. Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3:36374.  
7. Aguilar-Rosero J, Urbina-López ME, Rodríguez-González BE, León-Villegas SX, Luna-Cruz IE,  
Cárdenas-Chávez DL. Development and characterization of bioadsorbents derived from agricultural  
wastes for water reclamation: A review. Appl Sci. 2022;12(5):2740.  
8. Aswathy N, Varghese J, Vinod Kumar R. Photocatalytic degradation of malachite green using vanadium  
pentoxide-doped NiO thin film by solgel spin coating. Eur Phys J Plus. 2022;137: 1344.  
9. Keanjun N, Rattanawongwiboon T, Sricharoen P, Laksee S, Saengsane N, Thepchuay Y, et al. Ultrasound-  
assisted formation of composite materials from fish-scale waste hydroxyapatite in the presence of gamma-  
irradiated chitosan for the removal of malachite green. RSC Adv. 2024;14: 2973747.  
10. Shaikhiev IG, Kraysman NV, Sverguzova SV, Spesivtseva SE, Yarothckina AN. Fish scales as a  
biosorbentAdsorption mechanisms and kinetic behavior. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2020;10: 6893–  
6905.  
11. Nasuha N, Hameed BH. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm studies of a cationic dye using agricultural  
waste: Hazelnut shell. Chem Eng J. 2011; 166:57581.  
12. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha P. Removal of dyes using low-cost biosorbents: Review. Appl Water  
Sci. 2013;3: 36374.  
13. Zheng Y, Chen J, Ma S, Lu H, Li F. Alkali treatment of biomass material and its effects on surface  
functional groups and adsorption performance. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:2123545.  
14. Standard Laboratory Reference. Malachite Green Spectrophotometric Data.  
Page 7  
15. Bharathi KS, Ramesh ST. Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: A review.  
Appl Water Sci. 2013; 3:77390.  
16. Ho YS, McKay G. Pseudo-second-order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999;34: 451–  
65.  
17. Foo KY, Hameed BH. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J. 2010;  
156:210.  
18. Crini G, Lichtfouse E. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environ  
Chem Lett. 2019; 17:14555.  
19. Crini G, Lichtfouse E. Environmental benefits of adsorption in wastewater treatment. Environ Chem Lett.  
2019; 17:14555.  
20. Langmuir I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc. 1918;  
40:1361403.  
21. Freundlich H. Über die Adsorption in Lösungen. Z Phys Chem. 1906;57:385470.  
Page 8