stomach/rectum, and process of inversion at birth, medical science uses a more extensive anatomical
breakdown including surrounding organs (liver, kidneys bladder and intestines), differences in fetal lie/
presentation.
However, despite variations in detail and nomenclature, the core observations found in Buddhist texts are
remarkably similar to that established by clinical obstetrics. Both recognize that the fetal head descends into
the pelvis in a non-occiput anterior (OA) position prior to birth, though other positions for delivery can
happen. This divergence in the Buddhist emphasis probably also reflects its wider philosophic purpose—
demonstrating the conditions of saṁsāric existence and karmic continuity—than presenting a complete
anatomical work.
Therefore, the present study provides evidence that whereas biomedical science describes fetal development in
strict physiological terms and Buddhism places it within ethical, karmic and existential discourses,
explanations of fetal positioning and relations within the womb tend to be similar. Where congruences are
encountered, they represent tacit acknowledgment of natural processes; where disparities exist, they point to
the different purposes served by each framework: the development of scientific understanding or spiritual
illumination.
REFERENCES
1. Aṅguttarapāḷi (volume 1), Aṅguttaranikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar Aye,
Yangon, Myanmar, 1997.
2. Aṅguttarapāḷi (Volume II), Aṅguttaranikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar Aye,
Yangon, Myanmar, 1997.
3. Aṅguttarapāḷi, Vols. I, II, III. Aṅguttara-Nikāya. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.
4. Apadānapāḷi (Volume 1), Khuddakanikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar Aye,
Yangon, Myanmar, 2000.
5. Apadānapāḷi, Khuddakanikāya, Vol.II. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1991.
6. Cūḷaniddesapāḷi, Khuddakanikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, KabarAye, Yangon,
Myanmar, 2003.
7. Ariyālaṅkāra, Ashin. Sutta Sīlakkhandha-aṭṭhakathā Nissaya Vol. II. Yangon: Issathaya Piṭaka Press,
1968.
8. Aṭṭhasālinī (Dhammasaṅgaṇī) Aṭṭhakathā. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1995.
9. Buddhadattathera, Buddhavaṃsa-aṭṭhakathā (Volume 1), Ministry of Religious
Affairs, Kabar Aye, Yangon, Myanmar, 2000.
10. Dhammapadaaṭṭhakathā Vols I & II. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1992.
11. Dhammapālathera, Bhaddanta. Paramattha Dīpanī (Cariyā Piṭaka Aṭṭhakathā). Yangon: Department of
Religious Affairs, 1959.
12. Dhammapālathera, Bhaddanta. Paramattha Dīpanī (Cariyā Piṭaka Aṭṭhakathā). Yangon: Department of
Religious Affairs, 1959.
13. Jātaka Aṭṭhakathā Vol. I to VII. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.
14. Madhuratthavilāsinī (Buddhavaṃsa) Aṭṭhakathā. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.
15. Daw Tin Tin Lay, “An analysis of Embryology in Buddhism compared with Medical Science”
Department of Suttanta, International Theravāda Buddhist Missionary University, Yangon, Myanmar,
May, 2011.
16. Baker, Philip N, ed. Obsterics By Ten Teachers.18
th
ed. London Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, 2006.
17. Campbell, Stuart, and Ash Monga, ed. Gynaecology By Ten Teachers. 17
th
ed. London: Arnold, a
member of the Hodder Headline Group, 2000.
18. Hart, David McKay & Jane Norman. Gynaecology Illustrated. 5
th
ed. London: Harcourt Publishers
Limited, 2000.
19. Jeffcoate, T.N.A. Principles of Gyanecology.3
rd
ed. London: Butterworth & Co.Ltd. 1967.
20. Marieb, Elaine N. Human Anatomy and Physiology.4
th
ed. California: Benjamin/Cummings Science
Publishing,1998.