Exploring Fetal Condition: A Comparative Study of Buddhist  
Perspective and Modern Medical Science View  
Dr. Arnandar  
Gautam Buddha University G. Noida, UP, India  
Received: 25 November 2025; Accepted: 02 December 2025; Published: 11 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
Nowadays, Happy Birthday is widely celebrated around the world. Actually, according to the Buddhist  
teaching, in the Visuddhimagga, the Buddha said, “Jātipi Dukkha.” Birth is suffering. In this paper, the author  
would like to explore the fetus's condition and how it suffers from both perspectives: Buddhist doctrine and  
modern medical science. Furthermore, the Dhammapada verses will be widely illustrated to aid a clearer  
understanding of the nature of the Embryo in the mother’s womb, and modern medical science will highlight  
the fetus's suffering while in the mother's womb and as it passes through the mother’s birth canal.  
The aim of this investigation was to investigate and compare the Buddhist knowledge of fetal development  
including fetal placement inside mother’s body since Buddhism was originate concepts with the modern  
medical scientific explanation. This comparison aimed to identify similarities, or differences of great  
significance, between the anatomical and positional observations and developmental events that were  
described in materials from Buddhist sources and those from modern biomedicine.  
This study used a comparative method of analysis. The author also studied the Buddhists’ own literal sources  
on fetal development, mainly from canonical and commentary literature. Anatomical and obstetric  
descriptions from contemporary medical school textbooks and clinical literature were compared with the  
skull.  
The comparison indicated that the descriptions of fetal presentation and spatial relations in utero are largely  
compatible between Buddhist literature and medical science. Both models depict the fetus as being located  
directly posterior to the abdominal wall on a line between the mother's vertebral column and held in flexion  
during most of its time within the uterus. They also see the prevalence of (cephalic) head down position at  
birth as normal, though they acknowledge variations, in particular breech.  
Keywords:  
Buddhist Perspective, Medical Science View, Embryo, mother's womb, pregnant, parents,  
biological process  
INTRODUCTION  
In the human experience, we tend to associate pregnancy and child birth as a blessing prosperity, abundance  
and happiness. In the concept of Buddhist Philosophy, this is perceived much differently. Buddhism aims for  
the final release from the cycle of rebirthsaṁsāra—and so views its continuation as detrimental rather than  
a blessing. Even in the life of Prince Siddhattha his views were ingrained. Contrary to the common reaction of  
rejoicing at the news of his son’s birth, he said: “bondage has been born,” implying that relationships bring in  
emotional strings attached making renouncement difficult. From the experience of parental attachment as well  
as from the existential condition of the baby, being born again is seen to be a continued birth and not a happy  
one. In view of the fact that Buddhism rejects any action which leads to another saṁsāric life, it does not  
glorify any biological process that activates the cycle of birth, aging and so on. Such is the passion from which  
the Buddha says he was freed upon his awakening, when, as he says “no more will my life be born again”.  
From the viewpoint of contemporary medical science, pregnancy is considered as a continuum physiological  
Page 558  
phenomenon where uterus undergo remarkable structural and functional modifications in order to  
accommodate developing fetus. As a reproductive organ, the non-pregnant uterus remains a small pelvis-bound  
structure, resembling an inverted pear with thick muscular walls, about 7.5 cm in length and weighting some  
30-40 g; however, once conception is established its metamorphosis commences and slowly progresses  
without attracting attention until one fine morning the first no-mistake-of-it symptom: absence of  
menstruation. As pregnancy advances, the growing uterus also increases in weight and size, extending out of  
the pelvic cavity and into the abdomen. By 7 weeks it is the size of a chicken’s egg, by 10 weeks an orange  
and by 12 week has grown to a grapefruitpalpable abdominally. But the fundal height increases over  
pregnancy, to become approximately at the umbilicus by 22 weeks and just below the xiphoid process at about  
38 weeks. As the uterus grows, other organs of the abdomen are pushed away from it and by full term the  
fetus is parallel and anterior to the maternal vertebral column being run-of-the-mill when positioned with  
longitudinal cephalic presentation. While durations of pregnancy can differ, forty weeks is often used as a  
reference period due to the large variability and gender differentiation found in mid-length pregnancies (37 to  
42 weeks) according to WHO normal terms.  
The State of the Embryo in Its Place with Reference to Buddhism  
Whereas it for commoners is viewed as ovulation and delivery or child/children birth ceremony being one of  
the auspiciousness, it appears inversely in Buddhism due to its ultimate objective being liberation (from re-  
birth).1 This view is reflected in the biography of the prince Siddhattha. When told that a son was born to him  
his feeling was not like others and he said as follows: “bondage is born to me.” For it would be harder for him  
to leave the world, on account of children being in a natural way a strong bond upon parents.2 Here-in is the  
one related to parental side for having child, and to be emancipated from this samsāra it is one of the hurdles. It  
is considered from the opposite side also that to be born again and again is nothing but suffering according to  
the view of Buddhism also, because even for Buddhism it is impossible to bless any action concerning a  
biological process by which saṁsāric existence will occur repeating its life-cycle of birth, decay, and death;  
since Buddhism as a kind of asceticism ought necessarily be opposed to it.3 It can also be understood by  
reading the verses which were uttered by the Buddha. Immediately after His enlightenment the Buddha uttered  
the words expressing that for him there will be no more rebirths for Him. This utterance was recorded in the  
Dhammapada,  
“Anekajāti samsāraṁ sandhāvissaṁ anibbisaṁ  
gahakāraṁ gavesanto dukkhā jāti punappunaṁ  
Gahkārak diṭṭhosi puna gehaṁ na kāhasi  
sabbā te phāsukā bhaggā gahkūtaṁ visakhataṁ  
visaṅkhāragataṁ cittataṇhānaṁ khayamajjhagā” 4  
“Through many a birth I wandered in Saṁsāra, seeking but not finding, the builder of the house. Sorrowful it  
is to be born again and again.  
O! House-builder! Thou art seen. Thou shalt build no house again. All thy rafters are broken. Thy ridge-pole is  
shattered. My mind has attained the unconditioned. Achieved is the end of craving.”5  
1
Daw Tin Tin Lay, An analysis of Embryology in Buddhism compared with Medical Science” Department of Suttanta,  
International Theravāda Buddhist Missionary University, Yangon, Myanmar, May, 2011.  
2 Sayadaw U Sīlānanda, Dhammacakkappavatthana Sutta A Discourse on Setting in Motion the Wheel of  
Dhamma (Penang: Selangor Buddhist Vipassana Meditation Society, 2005), 5.  
L.P.N. Perera, Sexuality in Ancient India: A Study based on the Pali Vinayapitak (Kelaniya: The Postgraduate Institute of Pali and  
3
Buddhist Studies, University of Kelaniya, 1993),227.  
4 Dhammapadapāḷi . 36.Verse 153, 154. Jarāvagga. Udāna Vatthu  
Page 559  
And for the child or begotten to be born in any of these realms even the human sphere is suffering (dukkha).  
This is why when the Buddha delivered His first discourse: he said Birth is suffering Jātipi dukkhā. It can be  
seen that almost all Buddhist authours and commentators considered the Paisandhi time (that is, from the  
moment of conception until leaving from mother’s womb) as suffering and compared an embryo in its mother's  
womb with being in hell.  
This outlook onthe birth is suffering (Jātipi dukkhā)is portrayed picturesquely by the great commentator  
Buddhaghosa Thera in his famous book entitled Visuddhimagga thus,  
“ayaṃ hi satto mātukucchimhi nibbatamāno na uppalapadumappuṇḍarikādisu nabbattati, atha kho heṭṭhā  
āmāsayassa upari pakkāsayasssa udarapaṭalapiṭṭhihi kaṇṭakānaṃ ve majjhe paramasambādhetibbandhakāre  
nānākuṇapagandhaparibhāvita paramaduggandha pava navicarite adhimattajegucche kucchipadese pūti  
maccha pūtikummāsacandanikādīsu kimi viya nibbatatti. So tattha nibbatto dasa māse mātukucchisaµ  
bhavena usmanā pūṭapākaµ viya paccamāno piṭṭhapiṇḍi viya sediyamāno samiñjanapasāraṇādirahito  
6
adhimattaṃ dukkha manubhotīti, idaṃ tāva gabbhokkantimūlakaµdukkham”  
There it is said, he who (is being) born in the mother's womb- not as some one was born inside a blue or red or  
white water lily, &c., so also no research for that matter-he has been at the end of all just like a worm are to be  
found in stinking fish; stinking dough, cess-pools &c., and therefore coiled upinside the belly at one end below  
(the receptacle of undigested food] above [rectum], between them both; certainly very close and dingy with its  
air most strongly smitten by divers odour of ordure which exude from it and where such an entry too had to be  
adapted keeping up residence as (some growing) brute. Now having taken his birth (there) he is for ten months  
a most miserable creature being boiled like pudding in a cloth by the heat (engineered) inside the womb within  
mother earth’s belly and broiled as bread without bending, stretching back and so forth.7 Furthermore, the  
filthy state of a mother's womb (which has now become an inn for the poor baby) is compared to a dung-hill  
that has not been cleaned for years. That excrement bucket ain’t been washed in however long … whether the  
mother is twenty, thirty or forty years old.”8  
Further, thereafter we more detailed explanations about the dukkha or sufferings of embryo because mother’s  
actions in different ways like then she stumbles, moving or sitting down/standing up or turning round, its great  
suffering that men being jolted and dragged back and forth and hither and thither being called baby dies in the  
hands they fell over a drunkard. Or like a young snake entangled in ((the hand of)) the snake-charmer, and the  
burnt pain that exists to it when re-born in cold hells, by reason of (its) mother drinking cold water, and as  
though washed over with ashes-rain, through everything hot also eaten by its mother -- ((viz.)) rice-gruel, rice,  
etc., and as though lye-pickled by her eating anything salt or sour.9  
Furthermore, the condition of the embryo in his or her mother’s womb is reckoned as a hell being nerayika as  
he or she is suffering constantly all the time or uninterrupted. Staying in the mother’s womb is terrible in deed  
like a hell and the place is full of filth. This can be evident from the Jātaka Pāḷi “So ghoraraūpaṃ nirayam  
10  
upeti, subhāsubhaṃ muttakarīsapūraṃ. Sattā sakāya na jahanti giddhā, ye honti kāmesu avītarāgā”  
In addition, Buddhism does not keep silent on the subject of the duration of the pregnancy. Buddhist scriptures  
particularly the Visuddhimagga mentions this period as time of excessive suffering and states clearly for ten  
months (dasa māse).11 Though the Visuddhimagga just mentions it simply for ten long month of foetal  
suffering as hellish, the Paramatthamañjūsā describes more detail thus,  
5
The Advisers of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, The Teachings of the Buddha (Basic Level) (Yangon: Ministry of Religious  
Affairs, 1998),41.’  
6 Visuddhimagga-ṭīkā (Volume II). 131.  
7 Pāḷi Myanmar English Dictionary. 569.  
8 Pāḷi Myanmar English Dictionary. II. 198.  
9 TPP. 569-570. cf TDD.116  
10 Jātakapāḷi (paṭṭhamobhāgo). I. 137. Darīmukha Jātaka  
11 TPP. 569.  
Page 560  
Dasamāseti acantasaṃyoge upayogavacana, yebhuyyavasena vuttaṃ tato bhiyyopi ekaccānaṃ  
tatthāvaṭṭhānasambhavato12  
It is said in the sense of full intercourse through during ten months, that pregnancy lasts for (ten) months. This  
is just for general information but few foetus may stay in the position much longer than that.13  
Moreover, with regards to the duration of pregnancy Buddhism mentions a range of period of pregnancy that a  
child can be born ranging from seven months up to twelve months. It continues to say that if the child born at  
seven month of pregnancy though it cannot bearable to heat and cold it can survive. However, the child born at  
eight month can not survive since it is slight bigger than that of seven month born it has to confront with more  
difficulties while journey through the narrow birth canal of the mother. The child who delivers at nine months  
onward can survive and bearable to the heat and cold. Thus one can find the expression of Buddhism  
concerning the duration of pregnancy in general. Furthermore, it records the specific case which is beyond  
normal range of pregnancy length up to seven years and seven days (including duration of labour).14  
From the above statements taken from the Pāḷi scriptures, one can witness the outlook of Buddhism on the  
condition of the embryo vividly. It also stated the anatomical position of the embryo in relation to the other  
internal organs of the mother and their state, situation and the duration of the pregnancy.  
To put it into the nut shell, the embryo is in the position of flexion with its all limbs with inclusive of its head.  
Head appears upward and is situated under the stomach. Hence, the baby seems to be carrying the mother’s  
stomach with its head. And the buttock or rear part of the baby is positioning inferiorly and his condition is just  
sitting above the mother’s rectum. Mother’s belly is in front of the baby and behind it is the mother’s  
backbone. Moreover, duration of the pregnancy is identified as ten months and its ranges of possibility are also  
expressed shrewdly. In addition to the position of the embryo in the womb, Buddhism compared the mother  
womb with the hell for it sees where there is full of suffering constantly with no free space and time void of  
suffering. Having portraying the negative outlook upon the birth which is full of suffering with little happiness,  
Buddhism shed side light that without rebirth, these suffering would never come about. Because the birth is the  
basis (vatthumeva hoti) since there is no suffering in absence of birth. With these observations, it disheartens to  
be born again and again and highlights the suffering arising out of birth (jātipi dukkhā). And as a final point it  
kindles the sense of urgency to awaken and be liberated from the round of rebirths.  
Status of the embryo in Its Place from the standpoint of medical science  
According to the Medical Science, in course of time the uterus which is accommodating and nursing the baby  
inside grows and becomes heavier & heavier. One of the female reproductive system organ known as uterus is  
not other, it remains fully inside pelvic just before pregnancy that means when there will be no pregnancy then  
uterus position is normal anatomically. So, the normal adult female uterus is a pelvic organ after all! It is  
somewhat pear-like, inverse pear-shaped structure becomes narrower inferiorly towards the cervix. It is  
somewhat hollow, with dense muscular walls. The largest external dimensions are about 7.5 x 5 x3 cm.15 It is  
of about 30-40Gm in size and held at place by different ligaments like Broad ligament (Mesentery), Round  
Ligament of Uterus and Lateral Cervical or Cardinal ligament etc.  
It can also be defined as the level at which fetal head (in case of cephalic presentation of enumbrated) or  
presenting part goes in superior pelvic strait, and starts its decent inside the pelvis when its biparietal plane is  
below inlet. So, the mother feels the lightening (relief of abdominal distention). The foetal head at term lies  
beyond that of the mother’s bladder anteroinferiorly and the rectum posteroinferiorly in case of normal  
presentation. Thus, maternal cavity visera may sit on top of the and even small intestines are found upon or at  
side of foetal buttock as normal posture  
12 Pāḷi Myanmar English Dictionary. II. 198.  
13 Hee, loc.cit  
14  
Mahā Minhla Sithu, Kāyanupassanākyan : Contemplation of the Body (um,ekyomemusrf;) (Yangon: Hanthawaddy  
Press,1953),68,69.  
15 GTT. 12.  
Page 561  
.16 The uterus cavity is an inverted triangle in shape and when cut coronally he top tube open into the lateral  
angles.  
Pregnancy also is a natural process although the woman could not realize it. The initial “flag” signal is the  
cessation of the usual monthly menstrual period. Despite being high tech in the medical world it represents the  
first warning of soon to be (or just became) aware, if you know what I'm saying, or in basic human language,  
another sign that girl is pregnant.  
At 7 weeks pregnant, they say that your expanding uterus is the size of a large chicken egg. By 10 weeks, it is  
as big as an orange. By 12 week its the size of a grapefruit. The fundus can be felt abdominally at 12 weeks,  
and the mother may perceive abdominal enlargement by 16 weeks.17  
The pregnant uterus comes out of the pelvis and reaches above the symphysis pubis and enters into the  
abdominal cavity since it can no longer stay within the pelvis with increasing its size. The obstetricians or  
midwives can estimate the pregnancy by palpating the height of the uterine fundus approximately. At 12 weeks  
the fundal height can be palpable just above the pubic symphysis18. At 16 weeks it is midway between the  
pubic symphysis and umbilicus (navel). At 22 weeks it is at the navel. Accordingly the height of the fundus  
increases upward up to the xiphoid process (tip of the sternum) at 38 weeks. At 40 weeks (at the end of  
pregnancy), however, a reduction in fundal height known as lightening19 may occur.20Now the abdominal  
cavity of the mother is filled with the full term uterus. It occupies almost the whole place and thus the  
abdominal viscera pave the way for the uterus. The baby can be palpable manually from the abdomen since  
there are no organs between the full term uterus and abdominal wall of the mother. The kidneys are slightly  
displaced upward by a pregnant uterus and liver and spleen too.21Apart from them, the full term baby sheltered  
in the uterus lies anterior to the mother’s vertebral column (Thoracic and Lumber region). Though the lie22 of  
the baby varies from longitudinal lie, oblique lie to transverse lie, only a longitudinal lie is accepted as a  
normal lie.23When the pregnancy comes near to delivery, the foetus presents a cephalic presentation24 in  
normal pregnancy. It is not indeed known for certain how long human pregnancy lasts and likely does not the  
same in every female. It may be confidently affirmed that 40 weeks is the usual time, although a great deal has  
been written by medico-legal writers on this question and they differ widely in opinion.25 The length of  
pregnancy is actually determined by the world health organization (WHO) that the normal term for delivery  
lies between 37 weeks to 42 weeks.26 With regard to foetal presentation, the most common presentation is  
vertex presentation. The followings are the percentage of different kinds of presentation.  
95 % vertex presentation commonly occiput  
4 %  
breech pelvic presentation  
0.5 % face presentation  
0.5 % shoulder presentation27  
Moreover, the engagement of the foetus usually occurs 2-3 weeks before labour begins. Engagement means  
the descent of the biparietal diameter of the foetus through the pelvic brim.28 In addition, it can be considered  
16 Martini/ Bartholomew, Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology 4th ed. (San Francisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings, 2007),626.  
17 OI.59.  
18 A fibrocartilage pad where articulation of the two hip bones (pubis) of the opposite side occurs  
19 The sensation of decreased abdominal distention produced by the descent of the uterus into the pelvic cavity usually occurring 2-3  
weeks before labour begin  
20 Miller. loc.cit.  
21 OTT. 9.  
22 The lie is the relation of the long axis of the fetous to the mother  
23 Miller. op.cit., 76.  
24 The head of the foetus occupies the lower pole of the uterus  
26 http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/pregnancy+duration  
28 Miller. op.cit., 78.  
Page 562  
as the level at which fetal head (in cephalic presentation of enumbrated) or presenting part enters in to the  
superior pelvic strait, and begins its decent within the pelvis as its biparietal plane is below that of the pelvic  
inlet. So, it makes the mother feel the lightening (relief of abdominal distention). At term, the head of the  
foetus exceeds the mother’s urinary bladder and rectum in normal presentation. Hence, maternal cavity visera  
can stay on top of the and small intestines are located on top and side of the foetal buttock because the typical  
attitude  
29of the foetus is in full flexion.30 This attitude of full flexion gives foetus a vertex presentation which is the  
only normal presentation.31Now the foetus is 40 weeks at term and ready to be born and starts its journey  
through the birth canal of the mother. The diagram of the full-term pregnancy is inserted at the end of this  
chapter in order to comprehend clearly the condition of the normal full term pregnancy.  
A Comparative Study of the Buddhist and Scientific View on the Foetal Condition  
After thoroughly studying in and out of Buddhism and Medical science from all side views to the case of the  
foetal condition while it was still remained in the mother’s womb, one came across that most of cases  
concerning were not much different with each other. On the whole, the Buddhist outlook is not very different  
from that of Medical Science.  
“In respect of foetus in the mother’s womb Buddhism and science say with one mouth that there is no other  
organ which exists in front of the foetus except the mother belly. Regarding the organ or structure which exists  
behind the foetus, Buddhism indicates only the back-bone of he mother while Medical science exposes not  
only vertebral column but it also shows kidneys which are upward slightly elevated. Further, Buddhism  
declares that all foetal limbs are flexed with the head of the foetus being superior and the buttock inferior. It  
also discusses that the mother stomach is above the foetal head and mother rectum is below the foetal buttock.  
While it says the foetus is lying upward, it also says when the time of delivery comes, then the lie {position)  
of the foetus is reversed and made upside down for production through kamma. On the other hand, medical  
science tells us that during most of (95%) your pregnancy the foetus' cephalic presentation becomes perfect  
till near term. Therefore, in medical science rectum and bladder are the internal organs of the mother, which  
are below the fetus’s head. In addition, the mother’s organs which are high to the foetal buttock are stomach of  
their mother, liver and small intestines. But in some cases, the position of such foetus become other than  
normal presentation i.e. breech or hip end presentation of foetal buttock is filling lower part of uterus. When  
the mother coughs, then the stomach liver and small intestines of the dam arise above the calf’s head; and as  
also does its rectum and bladder lie under its buttock. In fact, the presentation of the foetus is not determined as  
fixed until this part has become engaged in the mother’s pelvic cavity. Thereby, the position of the foetus can  
be adjusted by itself or with an appropriate action from midwife (manual). It can be inferred from comparative  
statements like this that therefore the ideas in Buddhist and Medical science about condition of foetus, relation  
with internal abdominal organs of the mother and position of the foetus are almost similar if not one. The  
mother's organs and its relationship between the foetus said above in Buddhism is not even a half as described  
by medical science. It is probably because Buddhism concerns primarily with the situation and environment of  
the foetus in its mother’s womb that it want to emphasize on works crave during the time that it remained  
inside its mother’s womb, as well as when sliding down along its natural birth passage.  
CONCLUSION  
In conclusion, a review of Buddhist literature on fetal development in comparison with modern medical  
science indicates a high degree of conceptual concordance between ideas that were developed within  
contrasting intellectual traditions. Both views recognize the important anatomic facts that the fetus is located  
immediately behind the abdominal wall, with maternal spine serving as its posterior column. Whereas  
Buddhism's explanation is brief, focusing on the fetal position, location of and relationship to the mother’s  
stomach/rectum, and process of inversion at birth, medical science uses a more extensive anatomical  
29 The relationship of foetus’s different parts to each other  
30 Every foetal joint is flexed in full flexion  
31 Miller.op.cit.,77.  
Page 563  
breakdown including surrounding organs (liver, kidneys bladder and intestines), differences in fetal lie/  
presentation.  
However, despite variations in detail and nomenclature, the core observations found in Buddhist texts are  
remarkably similar to that established by clinical obstetrics. Both recognize that the fetal head descends into  
the pelvis in a non-occiput anterior (OA) position prior to birth, though other positions for delivery can  
happen. This divergence in the Buddhist emphasis probably also reflects its wider philosophic purpose—  
demonstrating the conditions of saṁsāric existence and karmic continuity—than presenting a complete  
anatomical work.  
Therefore, the present study provides evidence that whereas biomedical science describes fetal development in  
strict physiological terms and Buddhism places it within ethical, karmic and existential discourses,  
explanations of fetal positioning and relations within the womb tend to be similar. Where congruences are  
encountered, they represent tacit acknowledgment of natural processes; where disparities exist, they point to  
the different purposes served by each framework: the development of scientific understanding or spiritual  
illumination.  
REFERENCES:  
1. Aṅguttarapāḷi (volume 1), Aṅguttaranikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar  
Aye, Yangon, Myanmar, 1997.  
2. Aṅguttarapāḷi (Volume II), Aṅguttaranikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar  
Aye, Yangon, Myanmar, 1997.  
3. Aṅguttarapāḷi, Vols. I, II, III. Aguttara-Nikāya. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.  
4. Apadānapāḷi (Volume 1), Khuddakanikāya, Suttantapiṭaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar  
Aye, Yangon, Myanmar, 2000.  
5. Apadānapāḷi, Khuddakanikāya, Vol.II. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1991.  
6. Cūḷaniddesapāḷi, Khuddakanikāya, Suttantapiaka, Ministry of Religious Affairs, KabarAye, Yangon,  
Myanmar, 2003.  
7. Ariyālaṅkāra, Ashin. Sutta Sīlakkhandha-aṭṭhakathā Nissaya Vol. II. Yangon: Issathaya Piṭaka Press,  
1968.  
8. Aṭṭhasālinī (Dhammasaṅgaṇī) Aṭṭhakathā. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1995.  
9. Buddhadattathera, Buddhavasa-aṭṭhakathā (Volume 1), Ministry of Religious Affairs, Kabar Aye,  
Yangon, Myanmar, 2000.  
10. Dhammapadaaṭṭhakathā Vols I & II. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1992.  
11. Dhammapālathera, Bhaddanta. Paramattha Dīpanī (Cariyā Piṭaka Aṭṭhakathā). Yangon: Department  
of Religious Affairs, 1959.  
12. Dhammapālathera, Bhaddanta. Paramattha Dīpanī (Cariyā Piṭaka Aṭṭhakathā). Yangon: Department  
of Religious Affairs, 1959.  
13. Jātaka Aṭṭhakathā Vol. I to VII. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.  
14. Madhuratthavilāsinī (Buddhavaṃsa) Aṭṭhakathā. Yangon: Department of Religious Affairs, 1994.  
15. Daw Tin Tin Lay, An analysis of Embryology in Buddhism compared with Medical Science”  
Department of Suttanta, International Theravāda Buddhist Missionary University, Yangon,  
Myanmar, May, 2011.  
16. Baker, Philip N, ed. Obsterics By Ten Teachers.18th ed. London Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd,  
2006.  
17. Campbell, Stuart, and Ash Monga, ed. Gynaecology By Ten Teachers. 17th ed. London: Arnold, a  
member of the Hodder Headline Group, 2000.  
18. Hart, David McKay & Jane Norman. Gynaecology Illustrated. 5th ed. London: Harcourt Publishers  
Limited, 2000.  
19. Jeffcoate, T.N.A. Principles of Gyanecology.3rd ed. London: Butterworth & Co.Ltd. 1967.  
20. Marieb, Elaine N. Human Anatomy and Physiology.4th ed. California: Benjamin/Cummings Science  
Publishing,1998.  
21. Martini, Frederic (Ric) H, and Edwin F.Bartholomew. Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology.4th  
ed.San Fransico: Pearson Benjamin Cummings,2007.  
Page 564  
22. Martini, Frederic H, and Bartholomew, Edwin F. Essential of Anatomy & Physiology 4th ed. San  
Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.  
23. Mattox, John H. Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 9th ed. Arizona: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1991.  
24. Miller, Alistair W. F & Kevin P. Hanretty. Obstetrics Illustrated. 5th ed. London: Churchill  
Livingstone, Medical Division of Pearson Professional Limited, 1997.  
25. Sadler, T. W. Langman's Medical Embryology.7th ed. 1963. Reprint, Boltimore, Maryland:  
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,1995.  
Page 565