Yet, the post-independence shift toward industrial clothing, combined with the decline of local handloom
industries and insufficient institutional recognition, has marginalized this textile tradition. Unlike more
celebrated tribal textiles like the Dongria Kapdaganda or the Saora Mandia, the Pindhna Luga has not been the
subject of documentation or revivalist efforts by state or non-governmental actors. Its absence from textile
museums, ethnographic monographs, and fashion archives highlights a broader epistemic neglect of
marginalized tribal voices in heritage discourse (De, 2025; Sahoo, 2009).
Given the Oraon community's distinct linguistic (Kurukh), religious (animist and Christian syncretism), and
migratory history across Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha, the textile traditions they carry represent a
confluence of regional aesthetic vocabularies. This makes the Pindhna Luga a valuable subject for
ethnographic research, heritage preservation, and inclusive policy intervention. Urgent field-based
documentation, oral history collection, and integration of Kurukh weaving techniques into design curricula are
necessary to protect this neglected textile heritage from extinction.
Acknowledgment of Research Gaps. This section is compiled with interdisciplinary insight from tribal
cultural studies and parallels drawn from similar communities due to the lack of direct academic literature on
Pindhna Luga or Kurukh textiles in Sundargarh. Field-based ethnographic research, perhaps in collaboration
with the SCSTRTI, Odisha State Tribal Museum, or the Tribal Cooperative Marketing Federation (TRIFED), is
necessary to fill this academic void.
CONCLUSION
Indigenous textiles of Odisha represent a rare confluence of cultural identity, ecological consciousness, and
artisanal skill. Kotpad, Dongria, and Kurukh textile traditions reflect sustainable practices deeply rooted in
community life and environmental stewardship. Yet these traditions remain vulnerable due to market pressures,
modernization, and reduced transmission of knowledge. The findings reveal that while these textiles retain
cultural vitality, they face threats from market commercialization and loss of natural resources.
Strengthening policy backing, promoting fair market access, enabling designer–artisan collaborations, and
documenting endangered motifs and narratives are essential for safeguarding these traditions. Also, it
emphasizes that preservation must extend beyond documentation; it requires policy support, fair market access,
design innovation, and community empowerment. By embedding these textiles within contemporary
sustainability frameworks, the research contributes to understanding how traditional craft systems can inform
future models of ethical fashion, heritage conservation, and regenerative cultural economies.
The study contributes to heritage preservation discourse by providing a comprehensive framework for
understanding indigenous textiles through cultural, ecological, and socio-economic dimensions, reinforcing
their relevance in contemporary sustainable fashion.
In conclusion, above mentioned indigenous textiles exemplify how indigenous textile practices can serve as
conduits for ecological knowledge, cultural continuity, and political resistance. It invites further ethnographic,
semiotic, and interdisciplinary analysis to unpack its multilayered significance in the contemporary socio-
cultural landscape of tribal India.
REFERENCES
1. Behera, S. (2015). Textile traditions of Odisha: An analysis of weaving techniques. Journal of Indian
Textile Heritage, 12(2), 45–59.
2. Biswas, P. (2016). Embroidery and tribal aesthetics: A study of Dongria Kondh textiles. Tribal Arts
Review, 8(1), 22–31.
3. Blackburn, R. (Ed.). (2016). Sustainable apparel: Production, processing and recycling. Woodhead
Publishing.
4. Das, R. (2019). Ritual textiles of Odisha: Cultural meanings and community practices. Cultural
Studies Review, 17(3), 55–69.