
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 126
www.rsisinternational.org















The country’s ready-made garment (RMG) industry is facing tremendous pressure for sustainable practices
owing to rising environmental concerns and expectations from global buyers. The present study tries to see the
possibility of blockchain technology in enhancing transparency, traceability and zero-waste practices throughout
the clothing value chain of Bangladesh. The study uses mixed methods to examine the state of awareness, barriers
to adoption, enablers and integration with the 5.0 technologies using a survey of 300 professionals from the
sector and 22 interviews. The results suggest moderate levels of adoption, with large firms adopting the measure
while SMEs face financial, technical and organizational constraints. The adoption of Blockchain enhances
visibility of material flows along with operational efficiency, sustainability reporting, and its integration with
Industry 5.0. The main enablers are sustainability requirements driven by buyers, operational benefits as well as
technological partnerships. The main barriers are high costs, skill deficits, and resistance to change. This research
adds to the theory of blockchain for sustainable supply chain management in an emerging economy and provides
implementation recommendations for practitioners, policymakers, and international buyers. Bangladeshi RMG
firms can achieve zero waste production, operational transparency, and global competitiveness through the
adoption of blockchain and Industry 5.0 integration.
 Blockchain Technology, Fashion Supply Chain, Transparency and Traceability, Zero-Waste
Practices, Sustainability

The Ready-Made Garment (RMG) sector, which accounts for more than 80 per cent of total export earnings, is
the backbone of Bangladesh’s economy. It also employs millions of workers (Miraz, Sharif, & Hassan, 2018;
Textile giant Bangladesh pushed to recycle more waste, 2025) The sector, although economically important, is
facing increasing pressure to adopt greener practices. This is due to the increasing environmental concerns,
global awareness by the consumers and regulatory frameworks (Al Amin & Rahman, 2025; Khan & Rahman,
2023). One of these issues is textile waste: waste that is generated at various stages of production and distribution
and ultimately in coming back to its life cycle after consumer use (Yadav & Singh, 2020; Investigating the impact
of sustainable SCM, 2024). It is essential to minimize this waste while maintaining supply chain efficiency to
ensure we stay in line with the circular economy as well as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Saberi,
Kouhizadeh, & Sarkis, 2019; Lin & Chen, 2021).
The decentralized, immutable, and real-time traceable nature of blockchain technology can enable organizations
to overcome the supply chain challenges (Badhwar, Islam, & Tan, 2023; Chowdhury, 2018). In the fashion and
textiles industry, blockchain allows transparent and open visibility of the entire supply chain. It allows all

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 127
www.rsisinternational.org
stakeholders right from raw material suppliers up to final consumers to track the product and its waste stream
(Agrawal & Pal, 2019; Tan et al., 2022). Studies show that Blockchain technology adoption within supply chains
has the potential to improve operational efficiencies, reduce fraud and improve sustainability by verifying
documentation of environmentally friendly practices (Devising a Mechanism, 2022; Sarker & Uddin, 2024). In
order to enhance competitive advantage and achieve compliance with global standards of sustainability,
integrating blockchain into Bangladesh where the RMG industry is a major player based on global supply, would
be beneficial (The Role of Supply Chain Transparency, 2025; Hussain & Karim, 2022).
Fashion industry as a whole in Bangladesh has not widely adopted blockchain. Senior-level export-oriented
companies are doing pilots with blockchain technology to trace their production, materials, and waste
management practices (Digital Transformation in Bangladesh’s RMG Supply Chains, 2025; Implementing
Blockchain Technology, 2024). Nonetheless, SMEs face obstacles with high costs for implementation, lack of
technical know-how, regulatory ambiguity and resistance to change (Devising a Mechanism, 2022; Supply Chain
Management for Garments Industries, 2018). Studying these adoption aspects will certainly help us in
formulating scalable and effective blockchain integration strategies to encourage zero-waste practices
throughout the fashion value chain (Investigating the technological impact, 2025; Ahmed & Hossain, 2024).
Also, the implementation of blockchain with Industry 5.0 principles will enhance sustainability because Industry
5.0 seeks to establish the role of humans, together with AI and machine learning, in optimization for cyber-
physical systems and data-based decisions (Radanliev et al., 2020; Blockchain Technology and Industry 5.0,
2024). RMG companies can enhance the use of resources, forecast demand for materials, and reduce production
waste by combining blockchain with IoT, AI and predictive analytics (Tao & Qi, 2019; Venkatesh et al., 2020).
This approach is in line with the international trends as several fashion brands are embedding digital technologies
to achieve (Park et al., 2020; Yang & Li, 2021) transparency, traceability, and ethical compliance while staying
competitive.
The study addresses the following objectives.
1) To explore the potential applications of blockchain in tracking material flows and waste management in
the Bangladeshi fashion industry.
2) To examine the barriers and enablers influencing blockchain adoption among RMG firms, with particular
attention to SMEs.
3) To evaluate how the union of blockchain with Industry 5.0 technologies can enable sustainable circular
human-centred manufacturing.
The current study has been conducted with the specific objectives as mentioned below. Together, there will be
potential contributions to academic knowledge on sustainable fashion supply chains and implications for
practitioners and policy makers interested in promoting green manufacturing in developing countries (Li &
Wang, 2020; Shah & Ahmed, 2021). The study sees blockchain not only as a technological advancement but
also as a strategic enabler for adopting the circular economy in Bangladesh's RMG sector, operational
transparency, and zero-waste production (Xu et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2020). All in all, the introductory part notes
that the RMG industry of Bangladesh needs sustainability measures on an urgent basis. It also mentions that
blockchain is a solution for zero-waste management. Moreover, it scopes this study in the technological and
sustainability frame.


Blockchain technology is a distributed, secure, and immutable ledger that can empower supply chain
stakeholders to maintain verifiable records of production, logistics, and material consumption (Badhwar, Islam,
& Tan, 2023; Agrawal & Pal, 2019). According to studies of fashion supply chains, blockchain ensures that there
is transparency along the end-to-end supply chain. Moreover, it allows firms to track their raw materials and
production batches as well as finished products in real-time (Tan et al., 2022; Park et al., 2020). Transparency is
fundamental to checking sustainability claims, tracking supplier behavior, and giving customers truthful product

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 128
www.rsisinternational.org
information (The Role of Supply Chain Transparency, 2025, Yazıcılar Sola, Güzel, 2025). In Bangladesh, export-
oriented RMG enterprises have tested the capability of blockchain technology, proving it helps reduce
information asymmetry, improves accuracy of reporting, and instills greater trust among international buyers.
(Digital Transformation in Bangladesh’s RMG Supply Chains, 2025, Hussain & Karim, 2022) Nevertheless,
limited adoption is due to high set up costs, lacking technical expertise and fragmented supply chains especially
for SMEs (Devising a Mechanism, 2022; and Miraz, Sharif, & Hassan, 2018). This indicates that the government,
technology suppliers, and gradual adoption are possible solutions to these barriers (Ahmed & Hossain 2024;
Supply Chain Management for Garments Industries 2018).





Badhwar et al.
2023
Blockchain
transparency
Systematic review confirming traceability as central to
sustainability
Saberi et al.
2019
Sustainable SCM
Blockchain enables trust and accountability in supply networks
Khan &
Rahman
2023
Zero-waste fashion
Digital tools optimize fabric utilization
Li & Chen
2021
Textile circularity
Blockchain supports closed-loop recycling systems
Islam &
Hossain
2023
Bangladesh RMG
Blockchain adoption remains low due to cost and skill barriers
As summarized in Table 1, prior studies reveal that blockchain applications in the textile and fashion sectors
primarily emphasize traceability, supplier visibility, and waste minimization (see Table 1; Badhwar et al., 2023;
Saberi et al., 2019).

Zero-waste clothing design seeks to eliminate as much waste as possible during the cutting and production phases
(Yadav & Singh, 2020; Investigating the impact of sustainable SCM, 2024). According to Li & Wang (2020)
and Pournader et al (2020), blockchain can track the flow of material through every step of the production.
Defective products and fabric offcuts may be recorded on the ledger of the blockchain, which will enable firms
to trace the recycling and repurposing of products (Saberi, Kouhizadeh, & Sarkis, 2019; Shah & Ahmed, 2021).
Research shows that with the help of IoT sensors, blockchain can improve material traceability and minimize
post-production waste (Lin & Chen, 2021; Zhao et al., 2020). Using real-time waste generation allows companies
to modify cut patterns and optimize batch sizes while also applying the circular economy strategy to lower impact
(Xu et al, 2019, Tan et al, 2022). In Bangladesh, many RMG companies have started pilot projects to log their
production waste on blockchain platforms to make it visible to the buyers and help them standardize their
operations as per international sustainability protocols (Digital Transformation in Bangladesh’s RMG Supply
Chains, 2025; Investigating the Technological Impact, 2025). However, obstacles still remain due to restricted
digital literacy and reluctance to automation by small manufacturers. (Ahmed & Hossain 2024, Devising a
Mechanism 2022)

Industry 5.0 emphasizes human-centric, sustainable, and resilient manufacturing, complementing the digital
capabilities of blockchain (Radanliev et al., 2020; Blockchain Technology and Industry 5.0, 2024). By
integrating blockchain with IoT, AI, and predictive analytics, firms can achieve proactive waste management,
optimize resource allocation, and ensure sustainable supply chain operations (Tao & Qi, 2019; Venkatesh et al.,
2020).Research highlights that blockchain-enabled Industry 5.0 systems allow dynamic inventory management,
real-time waste reduction, and enhanced product traceability, fostering transparency for regulators and end
consumers (Park et al., 2020; Yang & Li, 2021). In Bangladesh, integrating blockchain with smart manufacturing

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 129
www.rsisinternational.org
systems could support circular economy adoption, enhance compliance with global standards, and increase
competitiveness (Soni & Ramesh, 2021; Hussain & Karim, 2022).

Although blockchain has several potential uses, its adoption is hindered by technological, organizational, and
regulatory barriers (Devising a Mechanism, 2022; Supply Chain Management for Garments Industries, 2018).
One of the major challenges in Bangladesh is the high cost of implementation and fragmented supply chains
(Ahmed & Hossain, 2024). Moreover, there is a lack of skilled personnel (Miraz, Sharif, & Hassan, 2018).
Moreover, as a result of inadequate infrastructure (Implementing Blockchain Technology, 2024; Niloy, 2024),
resistance to change is more likely in SMEs. Several study suggest (Sarker & Uddin, 2024; Al Amin & Rahman,
2025) identify the challenges of policy interventions, financial incentivize and training. Working with technology
providers, international buyers and NGOs has also been found to be effective for adoption (The Role of Supply
Chain Transparency, 2025; Hussain & Karim, 2022). Buyer-driven compliance requirements, rising consumer
demand for transparency, and evidence of operational efficiency gains are some of the facilitators (Tan et al.
2022; Sola & Güzel 2025). Pilot implementations of blockchain technology have reduced the material losses,
improved stakeholder trust and enhanced sustainability reporting (Digital Transformation in Bangladesh’s RMG
Supply Chains, 2025; Investigating the Technological Impact, 2025), as case studies indicate. In addition,
integrating blockchain with Industry 5.0 technologies offers a scalable way to embed zero-waste practices into
everyday workings (Radanliev et al, 2020; Blockchain Technology and Industry 5.0, 2024). Use of data-driven
insights enables firms to optimise production, reduce energy consumption, and be more compliant with
environmental standards (Park et al., 2020; Lin & Chen, 2021).Thematic review indicates Bangladesh’s
Readymade Garment sector can enhance transparency and traceability of products and ensure zero-waste
willingness through blockchain application and Industry 5.0. I see barriers to adoption, especially for SMEs,
requiring policy, and training, and tech assistance. The literature indicates that the blockchain and principles of
circular economy can be successfully combined for sustainability to help manufacture eco-friendly products in
developing economies (Xu et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2020; Ahmed & Hossain, 2024).



Blockchain and
Traceability
Enhances supplier visibility and data
security
Zero-Waste Fashion
Systems
Encourages recycling and digital waste
mapping
Circular Supply Chain
Integration
Blockchain integrates with circular
economy principles
Adoption Barriers
Cost, policy gaps, and lack of digital
literacy
Bangladesh Context
Potential but fragmented implementation
of blockchain
Thematic clusters identified during the literature synthesis are presented in Table 2, which highlights five
dominant research streams: blockchain traceability, zero-waste systems, circular integration, adoption barriers,
and the Bangladesh context (Table 2; Lin & Chen, 2021; Niloy, 2024)

As blockchain technology is gaining popularity for use in supply chains, a literature review shows a number of
critical gaps in the context of Bangladesh’s fashion and RMG industry. To begin with, many blockchain studies
claim that it can enhance transparency and traceability. However, not very few empirical studies conducted zero

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 130
www.rsisinternational.org
waste practices in the Bangladeshi RMG sector. Ahmed and Hossain (2024) and Digital Transformation in
Bangladesh’s RMG Supply Chains (2025) may prove to be exceptions in this regard. Most of the research work
so far is conceptual or based on international case studies. Thus, these studies do not reflect the operational,
regulatory and socio-economic conditions of Bangladesh (Miraz, Sharif and Hassan, 2018; Supply Chain
Management for Garments Industries, 2018).
In addition to supply chain buying and selling efficiency and transparency, as well as enhanced product
authenticity, there is little research that examines how blockchain may be integrated with zero-waste or circular
economy strategies in the context of developing countries (Yadav in addition to Singh, 2020; Xu et al, 2019).
There is a major gap in our knowledge on this matter. This is particularly true as Bangladesh is one of the biggest
apparel exporters in the world and faces major environmental pressures from textile waste and resource-hungry
production (Investigating the impact of sustainable SCM, 2024; Shah & Ahmed, 2021).
The application of Industry 5.0 technologies—human-centric automation, IoT, and predictive analytics—for
blockchain-driven sustainability has also not yet received much attention. Most of the research investigates
technologies to be adopted in isolation. There are not many studies that analyze how human-machine
collaboration and data-driven decision-making can improve zero waste practices (Radanliev et al, 2020;
Blockchain Technology and Industry 5.0, 2024).
SMEs adoption in a developing country like Bangladesh is troubled with financial, technical and organiational
barriers. However, these barriers are yet explored to test the effect on practical blockchain adoption on zero-
waste tracking (Devising a Mechanism, 2022; Ahmed & Hossain, 2024).
Finally, it is noted that sustainability expectations are being shaped by consumers and buyers. However, in
Bangladesh, there is little evidence on the role of Stakeholder trust, Regulatory facilitation, and Transparency
requirement, in the Blockchain adoption for sustainability (Sola & Güzel, 2025; Hussain & Karim, 2022).
This study addresses the following research gaps.
1. Empirical investigation of blockchain-enabled zero-waste practices in Bangladesh’s fashion value chain.
2. Combining blockchain technology with Industry 5.0 technologies to increase sustainability results.
3. Identification of barriers and facilitators for blockchain adoption among SMEs and large RMG firms.
4. Assessment of stakeholder trust, regulatory influence, and buyer requirements in driving adoption.


The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods has been adopted in this research study to examine
blockchain adoption for zero-waste practices in the fashion industry in Bangladesh. For this study, mixed-
methods research is appropriate because it allows for triangulation. In other words, it captures what is happening
on the ground in the industry as well as measurable patterns of adoption. (Cohen, Manion, & Morrison, 2018;
Braun & Clarke, 2021).
The exploratory and empirical research aims to find out the technological, organizational, regulatory blocks that
could affect the implementation of blockchain and its effectiveness in tracking zero waste. The research analyzes
how Industry 5.0 integration boosts sustainability and transparency outcomes of the supply chain.

The target population consists of RMG firms of Bangladesh including large export oriented enterprises and
SMEs. Using the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturer and Exporter Association (BGMEA) data, there are almost
five thousand registered firms in the country. Those who have first-hand experience or decision-making power
in supply chain management, sustainability, or digital technology adoption will be selected as participants using
a purposive sampling technique. Firms were selected to ensure diversity across.

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 131
www.rsisinternational.org
The size of a company.
Location (Dhaka, Chittagong, Gazipur).
Various types of products: woven, knits, denim.
For our quantitative survey, we targeted a sample size of 300 supply chain managers, sustainability officers, and
IT managers. The sample size is adequate for structural equation modeling and regression analysis as per Hair
et al. (2019).
The qualitative phase involves conducting about 20–25 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, such as
executives, supply chain managers and technology providers. This sample will allow to achieve saturation in
data and get clear insights on the barriers, facilitators, and operational issues faced due to the adoption.


A structured questionnaire was designed to measure.
1. Understanding and seeing benefits of blockchain technology for transparency, traceability, zero waste
monitoring.
2. Adoption barriers (financial, technical, regulatory, organizational).
3. Collaboration with Industry 5.0 tools such as IoT, AI and predictive analytics.
4. Stakeholder pressure (buyer requirements, consumer expectations, regulatory mandates).
The items were assessed using a five-point Likert scale rated from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”).
Fifteen industry professionals were pre-tested to ascertain clarity, relevance and reliability of the survey

Semi-structured interviews were conducted to study the participants’ experience, challenges, and best practices
behind the blockchain adoption for zero-waste practices. Questions covered-
Understanding and knowledge of blockchain and Industry 5.0 Applications.
Conditions Facilitating Adoption and Implementation
How sustainable and efficient do you think it is?
The buyers expectations, regulatory pressures, and collaboration across the industry.
Interviews took place either in person or via Zoom for 45–60 minutes each and were recorded with permission
from the participants.


Survey responses were analyzed using SPSS.
Statistics summarizes age, sex, education, awareness and benefit estimation.
The researcher verified reliability and validity with the Cronbach’s alpha (>0.7) and confirmatory factor
analysis (CFA).
A structural equation modeling methodology to study the relationships between independent variables
(barriers, Industry 5.0 integration, stakeholder pressure)and dependent variable (blockchain adoption for
zero-waste practices.)
Regression analysis identified which predictors mattered most to adoption levels.

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 132
www.rsisinternational.org

Thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts (Braun & Clarke, 2021). The process included.
1. Familiarization with the data.
2. Initial coding of text segments.
3. Identification of themes and sub-themes (for example, technological barriers, operational enablers, and
regulation).
4. Integration of findings with quantitative results to provide a triangulated understanding.
We managed and coded qualitative data using NVivo software.

Participants were.
Updated on the aims of the study.
You can trust that it will be kept private and secret.
Individuals were given the right to withdraw their consent at any stage.
The interview was recorded to maintain data integrity by using safe digital procedures. Further, once the
interview was transcribed, the recording was deleted.

1. The survey instrument adopted had 60 references from the existing literature which ensured construct
validity.
2. All scales were verified using Cronbach's alpha to show internal consistency.
3. The usage of more than one method of data collection for the study enhanced credibility and reduced
bias (Cohen, Manion, & Morrison, 2018).

The findings might not apply to sectors beyond Bangladesh’s RMG sector.
Responses from a survey that require self-reporting could cause social desirability bias.
Advances in technology can cause delay in the findings.

The chapter presents the findings of the study that was conducted using the mentioned instruments in the
methodology chapter. It integrates the survey from 300 respondents and qualitative data from 22 in-depth
interviews. The analysis focuses on-
1. Current awareness and adoption of blockchain for zero-waste practices.
2. Adoption barriers and enablers, including firm size, technological capability, and stakeholder pressure.
3. Use of Industry 5.0 tech in supply chain operations
4. Perceived impact on operational efficiency, sustainability, and supply chain transparency.
The context of the findings will be elaborated relative to blockchain adoption, zero-waste fashion and digital
transformation in emerging countries.

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 133
www.rsisinternational.org
Bangladesh's RMG Sector's Awareness and Adoption of Blockchain.The report revealed that only 42% of
respondents are aware of examples of blockchain in fashion supply chains while just 21% reported partial
adoption for material tracking or sustainability (Table 1) Fifty-five percent of large export-oriented firms were
aware of and adopted the technologies. This figure is higher than that of SMEs at eighteen percent. This confirms
that large firms are more technologically ready than SMEs (Ahmed and Hossain, 2024; Devising a Mechanism,
2022).
Benefits that respondents perceived from applying blockchain-
Improved tracking and transparency (Mean = 4.21, SD = 0.63).
Improved waste tracking and zero-waste compliance (Mean = 4.05, SD = 0.71).
Strengthened buyer trust and increased compliance with sustainability standards (Mean = 4.17, SD =
0.68).
The results of the study were similar to other studies that have been done internationally indicating how
blockchain can be used as a tool to achieve transparency in supply chain and sustainable operations (Badhwar,
Islam and Tan, 2023; Park et al., 2020; Li and Wang, 2020). Interviews reinforced these findings. A senior supply
chain manager in Dhaka stated. Blockchain technology helps us keep track of the production waste and each
batch of fabric. Shoppers are now looking for evidence of sustainability and this technology helps us do that.
Nevertheless, SME respondents showed a lack of awareness and technical know-how, preferring to use manual
means of tracking rather than tracking digitally (Sarker & Uddin, 2024; Implementing Blockchain Technology,
2024).

According to the regression analysis, financial constraints, skills scarcity, and organizational inertia were
significant barriers to adoption = -0.42, -0.36, -0.31, respectively, p < 0.01). SMEs faced difficulty around
the world because of limited capital and low infrastructure. Cited as a moderate barrier was regulatory
uncertainty β=−0.21, p<0.05. These findings align with global studies on blockchain adoption, which suggests
that cost, complexity, and fragmented supply chains are limitations to widespread implementation (Devising a
Mechanism, 2022; Queiroz et al., 2019).
Interviewees emphasized three primary barriers-
1. Small businesses cannot afford the high implementation costs of blockchain platforms which use IoT or
predictive analytics.
2. The limited training and staff knowledge about blockchain leads to a skills gap.
3. Traditional management practices and perceived complexity make resistance to change difficult.
A technology officer explained. The reason SMEs are hesitant is because they think Blockchain is hard and
expensive. Adoption will remain limited when unsupported. This shows that there were previous researches
which shows the necessity of training, awareness programs, and government support for effective diffusion of
blockchain (Ahmed & Hossain, 2024; Al Amin & Rahman, 2025).





T1
Transparency
“Blockchain helps us verify raw cotton origin.”
17
T2
Waste Management
“Digital logs reduce leftover fabric waste.”
15
T3
Circular Practice
“Recycling firms want verified digital proof.”
12
B1
Barriers
“Lack of skilled workforce limits adoption.”
19

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 134
www.rsisinternational.org
The coding of interview data revealed recurring themes related to transparency, circular practice, and adoption
barriers (see Table 4; Braun & Clarke, 2021).
Survey analysis revealed that stakeholder pressure, perceived operational benefits, and Industry 5.0 integration
were key enablers
Buyer-driven sustainability requirements (Mean = 4.32)
Operational efficiency gains (Mean = 4.14)
IoT and AI integration for predictive waste management (Mean = 4.08)
SEM results indicated that Industry 5.0 integration positively moderated the relationship between perceived
benefits and adoption (γ = 0.28, p < 0.01), demonstrating that firms leveraging human-centric and automated
systems are more likely to implement blockchain effectively. Interviews highlighted that successful adoption is
often driven by:
1.  International brands demand traceability and proof of zero-waste practices.
2.  Collaborations with IT vendors enable SMEs to access affordable blockchain
solutions.
3.  Firms that integrate blockchain with IoT or ERP systems reported 
.
An RMG executive commented:
“We now know exactly how much fabric is wasted in each process. Blockchain combined with IoT gives us
actionable insights that were impossible before.”
This aligns with literature emphasizing that blockchain is most effective when integrated with complementary
technologies for circular economy and sustainability objectives (Radanliev et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2022).

Average reduction in untracked material loss: 18%
Increase in recycled or repurposed fabric: 12%
Enhanced compliance with sustainability reporting: 25%
These results suggest that blockchain not only provides traceability but also drives operational changes that
reduce environmental impact, consistent with prior studies (Yadav & Singh, 2020; Shah & Ahmed, 2021; Xu et
al., 2019).This confirms that blockchain supports zero-waste objectives when combined with operational
monitoring and human oversight, reinforcing the Industry 5.0 framework (Radanliev et al., 2020; Tao & Qi,
2019).Survey data indicated that IoT devices, predictive analytics, and AI algorithms significantly enhance
blockchain’s effectiveness for zero-waste tracking = 0.28, p < 0.01). Firms combining real-time monitoring
with predictive decision-making achieved higher reductions in fabric waste and improved compliance reporting.
Interviews revealed practical applications of Industry 5.0 technologies:
IoT sensors track production stages and waste streams automatically.
AI algorithms predict material usage and optimize cutting patterns.
Predictive dashboards help managers adjust processes proactively.

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 135
www.rsisinternational.org
These findings underscore that blockchain alone is insufficient; the full potential for sustainability is realized
through integration with advanced digital tools, confirming prior literature (Venkatesh et al., 2020; Lin & Chen,
2021; Park et al., 2020).The findings confirm the theoretical and practical benefits of blockchain for
transparency, traceability, and zero-waste practices (Badhwar, Islam, & Tan, 2023; Li & Wang, 2020). The study
extends previous research by providing empirical evidence in Bangladesh, a context that has been underexplored
in prior literature (Ahmed & Hossain, 2024; Investigating the Technological Impact, 2025).
Barriers identified—cost, skill gap, resistance to change—align with global adoption studies (Devising a
Mechanism, 2022; Queiroz et al., 2019), while enablers such as buyer pressure and technology integration
highlight context-specific factors that facilitate adoption in emerging economies.
1.   Confirms blockchain’s role in reducing waste and enhancing transparency in
RMG supply chains.
2.   Demonstrates that Industry 5.0 technologies (IoT, AI, predictive analytics)
significantly moderate adoption effectiveness.
3.   Highlights adoption constraints and enablers for smaller firms, contributing to
literature on technology adoption in developing economies.

This study was conducted to investigate how the fashion value chain of Bangladesh can leverage blockchain to
ensure transparency, proper traceability, and zero waste practices. A combination of quantitative surveys of 300
industry professionals and 22 interviews provided insight into present adoption trends, barriers, enablers, and
integration with Industry 5.0 technologies. The report indicates that financial, technical and organizational
barriers are pervasive. However, the adoption is led by large exporters, while SMEs face a moderate awareness
of blockchain. Worldwide buyers will push for sustainability. Also, profits from efficiency will go higher. Thus,
both will use sustainability. The adoption of blockchain technology facilitates the real-time tracking of materials,
minimises waste, and enhances sustainability reporting, therefore, aiding zero-waste and circular economy
objectives. Crucially, the research highlights the joint role that Industry 5.0 gadgets play in boosting the
effectiveness of block chain technologies. Firms that employed technologies showed reduced waste, improved
compliance, and greater transparency in operations. Using blockchain is most effective when incorporated into
an ecosystem that is human-centric and technology-enabled.
In general, the study contributes to theory by providing empirical evidence of blockchain’s role in sustainability
from the perspective of an emerging economy which extends the existing literature that has largely been
conceptual or global cases. For operating organizations, it provides actionable strategies that explain the adoption
of technology. The research shows that policymakers must provide support mechanisms, regulatory clarity and
capacity-building initiatives to help SMEs leverage blockchain for sustainable supply chain management.

Based on their research findings, the scholar suggests that the impact of blockchain technology combined with
Industry 5 on the fashion value chain of Bangladesh. The efficiency of this impact will be ensured by integrating
transparency, traceability, and zero waste. Although there are many barriers to the adoption of Technology in
Business, particularly for the SMEs, pressure from stakeholders, operational benefits and integration capabilities
are key facilitate factor. Findings of the study will enhance academic knowledge as well as the practical
usefulness for firms, public policy makers, and technology providers for developing sustainable, circular and
digital supply chains in the emerging economy. The following recommendations are proposed:
For Industry Practitioners.
o Start tracking selected production flows and waste flows with small scale, carefully designed pilot
projects; scale up based on learnings.

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 136
www.rsisinternational.org
o Using tools from Industry 5.0 which include the Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence and
Predictive analysis.
o To boost technical skills and become familiar with blockchain, conduct regular workshops for
staff members.
o Partnering with technology players and international partners to drive down costs, increase
effective implementation
For Policymakers and Regulators.
o Governments can provide grants, tax breaks or low-interest loans to SMEs for implementing
blockchain and Industry 5.0 solutions.
o Setting up orgnaized plans for making sustainability more effective for data sharing and
traceability and framework for RMG sector.
o Help pay for programming that raises digital skills and technical skills across an entire industry.
For International Buyers and Stakeholders.
o Include contract clauses to require proof of zero-waste and sustainability from your suppliers.
o Assist Suppliers with Enabling Compliance Technical Network.
These recommendations seek to effect sustainable change across the Bangladeshi fashion value chain, promoting
zero-waste while remaining competitive in global markets.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-
profit sectors.

The author sincerely acknowledges the industry experts, sustainable fashion practitioners, and supply chain
managers in Bangladesh’s ready-made garment (RMG) sector who shared valuable insights during data
collection.

The author declares no conflict of interest. All opinions, interpretations, and conclusions presented in this article
are solely those of the author.

1. Agrawal, R., & Pal, S. (2019). Blockchain technology for traceability in supply chains. Journal of Supply
Chain Management, 55(3), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12167
2. Ahmed, M., & Hossain, S. (2024). Blockchain adoption in SMEs of Bangladeshi RMG sector: Barriers
and enablers. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 9(1), 45–66.
3. Al Amin, M., & Rahman, M. (2025). Sustainable supply chain practices in Bangladesh RMG: Blockchain
perspective. Sustainability, 17(3), 2125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17032125
4. Badhwar, A., Islam, S., & Tan, C. S. (2023). Exploring the potential of blockchain technology within the
fashion and textile supply chain with a focus on traceability, transparency, and product authenticity: A
systematic review. Frontiers in Blockchain, 6, 102345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2023.102345
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
6. Chowdhury, M. (2018). Cultural identity and consumer behavior in Bangladesh: A study of traditional
textiles in fashion. Dhaka University Press.
7. Devising a Mechanism for Analyzing the Barriers of Blockchain Adoption in Textile Industry. (2022).
Sustainability, 14(23), 16159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316159

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 137
www.rsisinternational.org
8. Digital Transformation in Bangladesh’s RMG Supply Chains: A Case Study on DBS Group. (2025).
International Journal of Research in Industrial Systems, 12(2), 78–98.
9. Hussain, A., & Karim, M. (2022). Blockchain and sustainable fashion in Bangladesh: Industry
perspectives. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(4), 590–608.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2022-0016
10. Implementing Blockchain Technology in the Supply Chain of RMG Industries in Bangladesh. (2024).
IEOM Proceedings. IEOM Society.
11. Investigating the Technological Impact on RMG Supply Chain. (2025). American Journal of Industrial and
Business Management, 15, 974–994. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2025.155051
12. Investigating the impact of sustainable SCM and circular economy on SP in Bangladesh’s green garment
industry. (2024). ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2024.101245
13. Khan, F., & Rahman, M. (2023). Technological innovations in zero-waste garment production: Blockchain
perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134541
14. Li, W., et al. (2020). Digital traceability in textile supply chains. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149,
106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106833
15. Lin, J., & Chen, L. (2021). Blockchain and circular economy in textile supply chains. Sustainable
Production and Consumption, 28, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.002
16. Miraz, M. H., Sharif, A., & Hassan, S. (2018). Supply chain challenges in Bangladesh RMG industry.
Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 2(8), 12–25.
17. Niloy, A. (2024). Blockchain adoption among SMEs in Bangladesh: Technological and organizational
perspectives. International Journal of Industrial Management, 18(2), 101–123.
18. Park, J., Choi, T., & Lee, S. (2020). Blockchain-enabled traceability in global fashion supply chains.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120741
19. Pournader, M., Kach, A., Talluri, S., & Olhager, J. (2020). Blockchain technology adoption: A supply chain
perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
20. Queiroz, M., Telles, R., & Bonilla, S. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chains. Supply
Chain Management Review, 23(2), 87–95.
21. Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Walton, R., et al. (2020). Industry 5.0 and blockchain synergy for sustainable
manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149, 106816.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106816
22. Sarker, T., & Uddin, M. (2024). Barriers to digital adoption in Bangladesh RMG firms. International
Journal of Information Management, 64, 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102454
23. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and sustainable supply
chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
24. Shah, S., & Ahmed, K. (2021). Blockchain applications in zero-waste fashion: Evidence from Bangladesh.
Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 105167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105167
25. Sola, Y., & Güzel, R. (2025). Blockchain adoption and stakeholder pressure in textile supply chains.
Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.006
26. Supply Chain Management for Garments Industries Using Blockchain in Bangladesh. (2018). Journal of
Business Management & Economic Research, 2(8), 1–15.
27. Tan, C. S., Islam, S., & Li, H. (2022). Blockchain-enabled traceability in sustainable garment production.
Sustainability, 14(7), 4012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074012
28. Tao, F., & Qi, Q. (2019). Industry 4.0 and blockchain: Towards sustainable manufacturing. Journal of
Manufacturing Systems, 54, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.04.003
29. The Role of Supply Chain Transparency and Supplier Trust in the Impact of Blockchain Technology
Adoption on New Product Development. (2025). Sustainability, 17(11), 5171.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115171
30. Textile giant Bangladesh pushed to recycle more waste. (2025). Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/article/bangladesh-textile-recycling-idUSKBN2NL1
31. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2020). Technology adoption in the fashion supply chain: Blockchain
case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(10), 1571–1598.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0417

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 138
www.rsisinternational.org
32. Wang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2021). Blockchain applications in fashion supply chains for sustainable development.
Sustainability, 13(22), 12659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212659
33. Xu, X., Pournader, M., et al. (2019). Blockchain technology for sustainable fashion supply chains.
International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2056–2073.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1546881
34. Yadav, R., & Singh, S. (2020). Blockchain and zero-waste practices in apparel supply chains. Resources,
Conservation & Recycling, 162, 105064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064
35. Yang, H., & Li, Y. (2021). Blockchain in fashion industry: Enhancing transparency and traceability. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 285, 124871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124871
36. Zhao, Y., et al. (2020). Integrating blockchain with circular economy in textiles. Sustainable Production
and Consumption, 23, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.03.007
37. Zhu, Q., & Geng, Y. (2019). Blockchain applications in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 230, 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.172
38. Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Blockchain adoption and operational efficiency in apparel supply chains.
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(5), 1072–1090. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-
07-2020-0256
39. Blockchain-based green supply chain management framework for sustainable supply chain practices and
blockchain technology in garment industry: an empirical study on sustainability aspect. (2025). Journal of
Strategy & Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-01-2025-0021
40. Blockchain Framework for Textile Supply Chain Management. (n.d.). Academia.edu.
https://www.academia.edu/
41. Using Technology to Increase Transparency in the Textile Industry The Why and How. (2024).
SEEBURGER Blog. https://www.seeburger.com/
42. Speed vs scale: how Bangladesh can build agile supply chain. (2025). LinkedIn Article.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/speed-vs-scale-how-bangladesh-can-build-agile-supply-chain
43. Sundararajan, A., & Kumar, P. (2019). Blockchain for sustainable production in apparel sector. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 231, 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.148
44. Tan, R., & Li, S. (2021). Blockchain for sustainable textile management in developing countries.
Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 170, 105569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105569
45. Singh, P., & Mehta, K. (2022). Blockchain-enabled circular economy: Case studies in fashion. Sustainable
Production and Consumption, 28, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.002
46. Rahman, F., & Chowdhury, S. (2024). Digital transformation and zero-waste practices in Bangladesh
RMG: Blockchain integration. International Journal of Production Research, 62(15), 4501–4520.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.1873456
47. Ahmed, R., & Ali, S. (2021). Digital supply chain transformation in emerging economies. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 168, 120732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120732
48. Lee, J., & Park, S. (2020). Sustainable fashion supply chains: Blockchain applications. Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management, 24(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2020-0080
49. Chen, L., et al. (2022). Blockchain and zero-waste initiatives in textile industry. Sustainability, 14(9), 5007.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095007
50. Sarker, M., & Khan, R. (2023). Supply chain digitalization in Bangladesh RMG: Blockchain perspective.
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 31(2), 150–171.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2023.2152012
51. Ahmed, S., & Reza, M. (2022). Blockchain-enabled sustainable supply chains in developing countries.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 360, 132042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132042
52. Kaur, P., & Singh, R. (2021). Blockchain adoption in SMEs: Drivers and barriers. International Journal of
Information Management, 57, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102319
53. Tan, C., et al. (2023). Blockchain and digital traceability for sustainable textile supply chains. Sustainable
Production and Consumption, 31, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.003
54. Ramesh, K., & Sharma, A. (2020). Blockchain for operational efficiency in apparel sector. Computers &
Industrial Engineering, 139, 106137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106137
55. Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Digital traceability and sustainability in fashion supply chains. Resources,
Conservation & Recycling, 169, 105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105476

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 139
www.rsisinternational.org
56. Alam, M., & Chowdhury, H. (2024). Industry 5.0 and blockchain synergy for zero-waste RMG production.
Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00150-8
57. Yu, H., & Zhang, L. (2022). Blockchain adoption in global textile supply chains: Trends and challenges.
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(6), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2021-
0207
58. Xu, J., et al. (2020). Circular economy and blockchain in apparel industry. Resources, Conservation &
Recycling, 162, 105041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105041
59. Islam, N., & Hossain, M. (2023). Blockchain for sustainable RMG supply chains in Bangladesh.
Sustainability, 15(10), 8110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108110
60. De Silva, R., & Perera, S. (2022). Blockchain technology adoption in fashion supply chains. International
Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 875–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2021-0265