INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 83
www.rsisinternational.org
Climate Change Impact and Adaptation Goal in Climate Vulnerable
Areas of SW Bangladesh
Mohammad Kamrul Hasan Bhuiyan
Independent Environment Consultant, House ECL 084, Sector 02, Jalshiri R/A, Daskhinbag Rupganj,
Narayanganj Bangladesh
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.101300006
Received: 20 October 2025; Accepted: 28 October 2025; Published: 14 November 2025
ABSTRACT
The WaSH program aims to respond to the need for greater climate resilient access to water, sanitation and
hygiene services (WaSH). These facilities need to be able to withstand disasters and planned with
consideration of potential climate change impacts in the future if they are to remain sustainable. However,
consultations have highlighted as this business case has been developed, that a key aspect to communities
being able to sustain the health and development benefits that access to WaSH brings, is building the resilience
of the community and their ability to plan and adapt for future scenarios. This means that after a post-
emergency, communities will not find their lives dragged back to ‘square one’ and resort to drinking unsafe
water and open defecation. For this to be achieved WaSH program will also support the local government to
understand their communities’ needs and plan effectively for emergencies.
INTRODUCTION
In Bangladesh, achieving the SDG 6 target to halve the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe
drinking water and basic sanitation is seriously challenged by climate change. Thereafter, following cyclone
Aila in May 2009 in Bangladesh, Government, local NGO and INGO have been involved in the recovery
efforts to help the population of Koyra Upazila of Satkhira District in Southwest Bangladesh. Safe water
resources were contaminated and household latrines destroyed, leaving over 300,000 people without access to
these basic services. The scale of impact was unprecedented in many communities even after many years they
have still inadequate access. This experience has generated a greater understanding of the vulnerabilities of
these communities and their specific needs. It has found in the study areas both in programmes area and
control area show that 95 percent of the household members were male in the programmes area whereas 94
percent male of the households in the control area; The maximum age was 90 in the programmes area and 80
in the control area and minimum age in the programmes area was 20 whereas the control area it was 26. The
average age of the household members was 44 in the programmes area and 46 in the control area. According to
the respondents; 45 percent occurred as illiterate, 28 percent primary, 19 percent people completed their
secondary level education, 7 percent have SSC/HSC level education and Graduate only 1 percent in the
programmes area where as in the control area the stature of the educational attainment was illiterate 32 percent,
primary level 26 percent, secondary level 24 percent, 16 percent got SSC/HSC level education and only 2
percent has got their graduation degree. The major reported occupations of the household head were house
wife 3% in the programmes area and 4% in the control area, service 3% in the Programmes area and 8% in the
control area, business 25% in the programmes area and 40% in the control area, 54% people is doing farming
in the programmes area and it is 18% in the control area; day laborer occurred in the programmes area and
control area was 10% & 26% respectively, the unemployment rate is 1% and 3% in the programmes area and
control area respectively.
Programmes Overview
The broad goal of WaSH programs in Bangladesh is to contribute to achieve the national goal on WaSH
through context-specific and scalable water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion in climate vulnerable
areas of Southwest Bangladesh. The outcomes of the WaSH programs are in the following.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 84
www.rsisinternational.org
Greater access to safe water and improved sanitation through effective, appropriate and scalable climate
resilient technologies, contributing to improve health amongst the communities of Satkhira District,
through a reduction in waterborne disease
Improved community resilience and ability to maintain WaSH behavior in the face of natural disasters,
contributing to sustained improved health
Increased learning on climate adaptation techniques contributing to improve national knowledge
management, which will be disseminated to promote greater access to water and sanitation and disaster
response in areas beyond Khulna.
A. Study Objectives
To know to what extent the poor and disadvantaged population in intervention areas has access to safe
drinking water, improved sanitation and hygiene through effective, appropriate and scalable climate
resilient technologies, contributing to improved health amongst the communities of Koyra in Satkhira
District, through a reduction in waterborne disease
To identify the level of community resilience and ability to maintain WaSH behavior in the face of natural
disasters, contributing to sustained improved health
To assess the situation of knowledge of targeted population in intervention areas on climate adaptation
techniques contributing to improved national knowledge management
STUDY METHODOLOGY
WaSH evaluation was carried out basically using three methods: (i) pre- and post method using recall; (ii)
programmes and control method using baseline data; or (iii) simply programmes and control method using
new sampling method.
Beneficiary level sample survey in the catchments areas where programs were started. The targets were
included randomly selected sample households (within catchments of the programmes where programmes had
been implemented) and from each household preferably adult female of the household were interviewed using
structured and standardized questionnaire for interpersonal interviews. The samples were taken from both the
treatment (programmes intervention: upazilas, unions and villages) areas and also Comparison areas from the
adjacent upazilas, unions and villages where programmes program was not implemented by NGOs & INGOs.
Sample Design And Technique Including Sample Size & Distribution
Programmes area: Koyra and Dumuria Upazilas of Satkhira District
Sample design: A stratified sampling technique was adopted for the study.
Sample Selection A stratified multi-stage sampling methodology was applied to select the survey units (i.e.
household). The sampling was comprised of two stages, first of 7 programmes unions, 7 villages (1 from each
union) were selected randomly. Finally, required number of beneficiary households was selected within each
selected village. As the programmes had list of targeted beneficiaries, the beneficiary households were selected
with systematic random sampling procedure using an appropriate sampling interval (depending on the number
of potential respondents and required number of samples).
In order to determine the required sample size an approach based on confidence level and precision rate were
followed. Statistics of the approach was that the statistical validity of a sample did not depend on its size
relative to the population being investigated. Rather what matters was the required level of probability
(confidence level), required degree of precision and the variability of the population. The following formula
had been used to estimate the required sample size:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 85
www.rsisinternational.org
Sample size had been worked out for the quantitative survey following the formula (Islam 2011) depicted
below:
n =
Nn
0
N + n
0
Where n
0
= z
2
p(1-p)/d
2
We first calculated n
0.
If n
0
/N was negligible, then n
0
was a satisfactory approximation to n.
=385
As N (34,045 Target beneficiaries in the Upazila) was
known the formula led to the following:
=380
n = sample size, p=0.50; z=1.96 to 95% was the Confidence
Limit and d=desired level of precision or significance was
0.05 or 5%.
As per statistical requirement the study was needed to cover minimum 385 samples and to make the figure
round the sample was fixed at 400. To meet the objective a comparison area or control area was selected for
the study. A total of 200 (50% of the sample programmes) households had been selected from control
Upazilas. The control Upazila was selected adjacent to the programmes upazila. From the control Upazila 7
unions were selected randomly and from the selected union, village were selected randomly and from the
selected village required number of households had been taken following systematic random sampling method.
Table below shows sample districts, Upazila, union and villages.
Distribution of sample size by
districts, unions and villages
Programmes Intervention
sample areas
Total sample areas
Upazila
Upa
zilas
Uni
ons
Vill
ages
HHs/ben
eficiary
Upa
zilas
Uni
ons
Vill
ages
H
H
s
Upa
zilas
Un
ion
Vill
age
HHs/ben
eficiary
Koira
1
7
7
400
1
7
7
400
Dumuria
1
7
7
20
0
1
7
7
200
Total
1
7
7
400
1
7
7
20
0
2
14
14
600
Samples For Qualitative In-Depth Investigation
Qualitative investigations were conducted applying following methods:
Literatures/Documents Search: Reviewed baseline survey and related reports/documents.
Focus Group Discussions (FGDs): FGDs with community leaders. Total FGDs were 7, one in each
sample programmes union. Each FGD comprised 8 participants comprising men and women of the
community. Among the 7 FGDs, 5 were conducted in programmes area (2 with WDMC and 3 with
community leaders) and 2 were conducted in control area (with community leaders).
n
0
=
(1.96
2
)(0.5)(0.5)
(0.05)
2
n
=
34045X385
34045+385
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 86
www.rsisinternational.org
Intensive Interviews: 10 intensive interviews (1 in each programmes union and 3 from upazila) with the
programmes personnel
Union Profile Checklist: 14 Unions Profile Checklist was filled up. Using the Union Profile Checklist
data on Catchments’ (Unions) Profile, primarily development aspects: NGO working on hygiene,
sanitation, health centers and their working area, communication network, development works, trading,
marketplaces and growth centers, and the disadvantaged population groups were taken.
FINDINGS FROM QUALITATIVE SURVEY
Idi With Upazila And Union Programmes Officers
Three in-depth interviews (IDI) at Upazila level and 07 (seven) IDI in Union levels were conducted to know
the success and challenges of WaSH programs on improvement of water, sanitation and health status in Koyra
Upazila.
A. Activities Taken Under Wash Programs
Formation of WDMC in each Union.
Prepared action plan in Ward and Union level.
Construction of toilets.
Construction of different types of water sources.
Construction of water treatment plant.
Improvement of water and sanitation system in cyclone shelter.
Awareness raising activities on climate change impacts and disaster risks.
Video presentation on cyclones.
Health and sanitation related materials distribute within school children.
Training on different aspects of the programmes beneficiaries.
Encouragement of programmes benefits health and sanitation.
Other activities include miking and rally during day observation and validation meetings with Upazila and
Ward level stakeholders.
Other activities include miking and rally during day observation and validation meetings with Upazila and
Ward level stakeholders.
A. Role Of Wdmc
Participatory WASH Vulnerable Assessment.
Disaster preparedness (pre-, during and post disaster).
Early warning of disaster.
Evacuation and rescue during disaster.
Help with the construction of roads and infrastructure.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 87
www.rsisinternational.org
Prepare Ward Development Plan and implementation of this plan.
Coordination with other NGOs working in the area.
Site selection for infrastructures; ensure quality of work, and monitoring and supervision.
C. Role Of Union Parishad In Disaster Risk Management
Each Union Parishad has its own budget for disaster risk management and the amount of budget for disaster
risk management is about 5-10% of the total budget. But, for a coastal area such amount of budget is
insufficient where natural disaster occurs every year at any time. Respondents also mentioned that Union
Parishad has ability to face the disastrous situation. However, if they get more budget, instruments and
infrastructure facility and manpower thus they will tackle the situation more effectively. Moreover, Union
Parishad must reduce the dependency of NGOs and outsider help. The role of Union Parishad in disaster risk
management is given below:
Disseminate safe drinking water plan among the community people.
Send disaster related messages to all Union level offices.
Identify water sources and take initiative.
Hand tube well distributed among poor and ultra poor.
Increasing awareness of the use of safe drinking water.
Regularly follow-up the activities of caretakers.
Households’ Observations
Almost 100% of respondents have own latrine both in programmes and control area (fig-1) but 90% in the
programmes have hygienic latrine and 60% respondents in the control area used hygienic latrine, remaining
10% & 40% both areas respectively didn’t use hygienic latrine (fig-2). 80% & 35% respondents in both areas
correspondingly have hand washing place beside their latrine (fig-3) whereas 68% & 25% respondents both in
programmes and control areas respectively habituated to keep water for hand washing beside their latrine.
80% in the control area, 20% respondents in the control area didn’t use soap after their toilet (fig-5) and 5% &
8% both in the programmes area and control area correspondingly didn’t like to keep soap for latrine uses (fig-
6). 68% and 40% respondents of the households both in the programmes and control areas used to keep their
latrine neat and clean; 25% & 45% both areas respondents respectively used to keep their latrine moderately
neat and clean & 7% & 15% didn’t clean their latrine regularly (fig-7) and 98% & 95% respectively in the
programmes and control areas didn’t have own safe water source (fig-8). Only 2% respondents in the
programmes area and 5% in the control area used to have own safe water source (fig-9) and 90 % and 10%
respondents in the control and programmes areas used cover in their latrine by water pot (fig-10). 5% in the
programmes area and 40% in the control area didn’t clean their home areas regularly (fig-11) and whereas
15% respondents in the programmes area didn’t do this practice and 25% found in the control area who didn’t
manage their garbage properly by throwing in a fixed place or pothole in considering the safe environment
(fig-12).
Fig-1 fig-2 fig-3 fig-4
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 88
www.rsisinternational.org
Fig-5 fig-6 fig-7 fig-8
Fig-9 fig-10 fig-11 fig-12
Participatory Wash Vulnerable Assessment
Participatory WASH Vulnerable Assessment (PWVA) is a tool developed under WASH program which
involves communities, local authorities and other stakeholders in an in-depth examination of what makes them
vulnerable. PWVA provides a solid foundation for designing, planning, implementing and evaluating practical
coping and adaptive strategies. Under this programme, the main aim of PWVA is to identify the vulnerability
of local communities on safe drinking water, sanitation and hygiene as well as prepare WASH mapping,
seasonal calendar, institutional map, and development plan, etc.
Respondents mentioned that climate is changing frequently in the area, and the most common climate change
related impacts are:
increased temperature.
variation of rainfall patterns (high and low rainfall).
salinity intrusion.
increased the frequency of cyclones and storm surges.
flood, water logging and coastal erosion.
damage house, road, infrastructure.
damage agriculture field and shrimp farm, and
Sea level rising, etc.
They also mentioned that, to respond to the impacts of climate change that are already happening, while at the
same time prepare for future impacts to prevent or minimize the damage they can cause, or taking advantage of
opportunities that may arise are called climate change adaptation. These responds/ adjustments can be
protective (i.e., guarding against negative impacts of climate change), or opportunistic (i.e., taking advantage
of any beneficial effects of climate change).
Some examples of adaptation measures in the study area include:
Tree plantation activities in the roadside and homestead (50%);
Raise the platform of house, tube well and toilet (100%);
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 89
www.rsisinternational.org
Repair road, culvert, dam and shelter centre (56.25%);
Make portable stove and pile up firewood (62.5%);
Collect dry food like Chira, Muri and Khoi, molasses, biscuits, and essential medicines (75%);
Ensure safe drinking and cooking water (100%);
Save an amount from family expenditure whenever possible (87.5%).
Disaster Risk Management (Drm)
Respondents mentioned several activities or planned adaptive management strategies for disaster risk
reduction/ management, such as:
Increase tree plantation activities under social forestry programme (81.25%);
Construction and repair of dam and road (100%)
Proper drainage facility (43.75%);
Rainwater harvesting technology (37.5%);
Construction of more cyclone shelters (25%);
Protection of riverbank (81.25
CONCLUSION
Natural disaster affected by last 5 years in considering the terms of climatic resilience and disaster risk
reduction; 99.5% respondents have said ’Yes” & only 0.05% said ‘Noin this issue in the programmes area.
That’s mean; almost every respondent in the programmes area was aware that how many disasters affected
them in the last five years. 38% respondents in the programmes area were affected by floods in the last five
years as a type of natural disaster, 14% were affected by drought, 79% by tornado, 25% by cyclone, 82% have
had bitter experience on flown of water, 2% affected by river erosion and 63% respondents suffered by saline
water. 7% didn't get water from water source due to water layer depleted, 2% were unable to collect water
from water source due to water source dry & 40% respondents faced unusable problem due to increasing of
salinity in the source water. 96% responded that they faced distance problem that water source was far away
from their homestead; 80% considered that it was time constraints; 46% thought it was cost effective & 2%
collected their water in the ebb time. 60% respondents willingly considered the distance for collecting their
water, 17% to avoid distance they were collected water from other source areas, 5% sacrificed the cost for
considering the collection of safe water, 8% repaired their water source by their own cost, 2% collected ebb
water without hesitation; 2% used to collect water from forest area, 3% used to solve their problem altogether,
Costic soda used for water purification by 1% respondents and 2% respondents installed water pump for
identified new water source.
Respondents were asked to know how they were affected by climate change. To get this answer, it shows that
87% in the programmes area and 80% respondents in the control area were frequently affected by cyclones:
unseasonal flood affected to 20% respondents both programmes and control area consequently. 86% had worst
experienced on water over flown in the programmes area and 20% only faced same problem in the control
area; 26% in the programmes area and 66% in the control area affected by drought, earthquakes affected to
42% in the programmes area and 6% in the control area whereas tsunami experienced respondents were 10%
in the programmes area and 0% in the control area.
Respondents were posed to let us know how they could prepare in the pre- and post disaster period and what
their perception on disaster risk reduction (DRR) and Climatic Resilience (CR) value. The observatory data
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue XIII October 2025
Special Issue on Innovations in Environmental Science and Sustainable Engineering
Page 90
www.rsisinternational.org
shows that 99% respondents in the programmes area whereas 66% respondents in the control areas have had
Preparedness for going to cyclone centers after hearing disaster warning, 61% & 36% respondents both
programmes and control area consequently preserved safe water, necessary requirements taken to safe place or
put into the soil by 64% and 16% respondents both in programmes and control area respectively, 37% in the
programmes area and 36% in the control area used to tree plantation, 3% in the programmes area and 2% in the
control area willingly taken training on ride on tree & swimming as surviving technique during the disaster
period, homestead land and latrine raised up by 39% & 43% respondents in the programmes and control areas
consequently; 7% & 11% in the programmes and control areas have taken required knowledge on primary
health care and 10% respondents have learnt the ways of water purification in the programmes area and it was
learnt by 21% respondents in the control area.
Abbreviations And Acronyms
WaSH
Water Sanitation and Hygiene
DRM
Disaster Risk Management
FGDs
Focus Group Discussions
IDI
In-Depth Interview
INGO
International Non-Governmental Organization
MDGs
Millennium Development Goals
NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
PWVA
Participatory WASH Vulnerable Assessment
UPs
Union Parishads
WDMC
Ward Disaster Management Committee
REFERENCES
1. Anaheim A. and Schjolden A. 2004, An Approach to Utilise Climate Change Impacts Studies in
National Assessments. Global Environ. Change. 14, pp 147 160.
2. Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO) 2002, Living with Climate Change: An Overview of Potential
Climate Change Impacts on Australia; Australian Greenhouse Office: Canberra.
3. Ahmed, A., U. (2004). A review of the current policy regime in Bangladesh in relation to climate
change adaptation, Reducing Vulnerability to Climate Change (RVCC) Programmes, CARE
Bangladesh, Khulna. Ayers, J. M. & Huq, S. (2009). The value of linking mitigation and adaptation: A
Case study of Bangladesh. Environmental Management, 43:753-764
4. Huq, S. & Ayers, J. (2008). Taking steps: mainstreaming national adaptation. IIED Briefing. [Internet]
Available at http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/17040
5. Tanner T.M., A. Hassan, K.M.N. Islam, D. Conway, R. Mechler, A.U. Ahmed, and M. Alam. 2007.
ORCHID: Piloting Climate Risk Screening in DFID Bangladesh. Research Report. Brighton: Institute
of Development Studies. Available at http://www.ids. =ac.uk/index.cfm?objectid=1A63F7C6-0A7E-
0B97-A0C54F586A2804A8.
6. CDMP, (2006). Available at http://www.climatechangecell-d.org/publications d.org/publication