INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 196

www.rsisinternational.org

Integration of Blockchain or Distributed Ledger Technologies for

Secure, Transparent Onboarding and Lending Workflows

Mr. Vaivaw Kumar Singh

, Dr. Kunal Sinha

, Dr. Sandeep Nath Sahdeo

Research Scholar, Faculty of Business Management, Sarala Birla University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Commerce, Sarala Birla University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi,

Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900018

Received: 10 September 2025; Accepted: 17 September 2025; Published: 11 October 2025

ABSTRACT

In today’s financial landscape, customer onboarding and lending workflows are increasingly scrutinized for

inefficiencies, security vulnerabilities, and compliance risks. Traditional processes rely heavily on centralized

databases, manual verifications, and redundant Know Your Customer (KYC) checks, all of which contribute to

high operational costs, delays, and susceptibility to fraud. As financial institutions seek more resilient and

transparent systems, the integration of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLT) emerges as a

promising solution.

This paper explores how blockchain—particularly permissioned or consortium-based architectures—can

transform onboarding and lending processes by introducing secure, tamper-proof, and auditable transaction

records. We present a conceptual framework that leverages smart contracts, decentralized identity (DID), and

verifiable credentials (VC) to automate and streamline key steps in customer verification, loan approval, and

regulatory reporting. By enabling shared, real-time access to validated information among trusted parties, DLT

can reduce duplication, enhance trust, and improve compliance with regulatory mandates such as AML/KYC

and data protection laws.

The study also evaluates practical considerations, including system interoperability, privacy challenges,

governance models, and legal implications. Case examples and pilot initiatives are reviewed to ground the

theoretical model in real-world implementations. Ultimately, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive

foundation for understanding and applying blockchain-based systems in the financial sector’s most sensitive

workflows.

Keywords: Blockchain, Lending, Security, Transparency, Distributed Ledger Technologies

INTRODUCTION

The financial services sector has experienced rapid digital transformation over the past decade, driven by

advancements in technology and increasing customer expectations for seamless, secure, and fast interactions.

Despite this progress, critical processes such as customer onboarding and loan origination remain riddled with

inefficiencies, redundancies, and security risks. These workflows typically involve multiple stages—identity

verification, KYC/AML compliance checks, documentation handling, credit assessment, and approval—each

often performed manually or through siloed systems that do not communicate effectively with one another.

These traditional methods suffer from several challenges. Repeated and isolated KYC procedures across

institutions lead to high costs and customer friction. Centralized databases, which are vulnerable to breaches and

tampering, pose significant risks to sensitive customer information. Moreover, regulatory compliance requires

detailed audit trails, which are difficult to maintain with paper-based or fragmented digital systems. This not

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 197

www.rsisinternational.org

only slows down the onboarding and lending cycles but also undermines trust between stakeholders, including

regulators, customers, and financial institutions.

Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) present a compelling alternative. By enabling a

decentralized, tamper-resistant, and transparent system for recording and verifying transactions, blockchain

holds the potential to revolutionize onboarding and lending workflows. In particular, permissioned

blockchains—designed for regulated environments—allow for controlled access, identity management, and

interoperability between trusted parties such as banks, KYC service providers, credit bureaus, and regulators.

When integrated with smart contracts and privacy-preserving identity technologies like Decentralized Identifiers

(DIDs) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs), blockchain systems can automate decision-making, reduce fraud, and

ensure compliance while improving operational efficiency.

This research paper aims to explore how the integration of blockchain or DLT can enhance the security,

transparency, and efficiency of onboarding and lending workflows. It proposes a conceptual framework that

outlines key components, interactions, and benefits of a blockchain-based system, supported by real-world

examples and pilot studies. The paper also examines potential barriers to adoption, including regulatory,

technical, and governance-related challenges.

By providing a structured analysis and proposed model, this paper contributes to the growing body of knowledge

on blockchain’s role in financial services and seeks to guide financial institutions, policymakers, and

technologists in their pursuit of more trustworthy and efficient systems for customer onboarding and lending.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Overview of Onboarding and Lending Workflows in Financial Services

In traditional financial institutions, customer onboarding is a multi-step process that includes collecting personal

data, verifying identity, performing Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks,

risk assessment, and account creation. Similarly, the lending workflow involves creditworthiness evaluation,

income verification, risk underwriting, loan approval, and disbursement. These workflows are heavily reliant on

manual operations, fragmented data systems, and time-consuming documentation processes.

One of the most significant challenges is the repetition of KYC procedures across financial institutions,

especially when customers engage with multiple providers. Each institution must independently verify identity

and compliance, leading to duplication of effort, increased costs, and customer dissatisfaction. Moreover, these

processes often involve centralized systems that are vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches, data tampering, and

unauthorized access.

According to reports by organizations like the World Bank and Deloitte, onboarding alone can take weeks in

certain regions, and the cost of compliance with regulatory requirements is steadily rising. These inefficiencies

not only hinder user experience but also reduce profitability for banks and fintechs. As the demand for secure,

efficient, and customer-centric solutions grows, emerging technologies are being explored to address these long-

standing pain points.

Introduction to Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT)

Blockchain and DLT have emerged as transformative technologies in the financial sector. At their core, these

systems provide a decentralized, immutable ledger where transactions are securely recorded across a distributed

network of participants. This architecture eliminates the need for a central authority and ensures transparency,

traceability, and integrity of data.

While public blockchains (like Bitcoin and Ethereum) are open and permissionless, permissioned blockchains

such as Hyperledger Fabric, Corda, and Quorum are specifically designed for enterprise and regulated use cases.

These platforms offer customizable access control, data privacy through encryption and channeling, and higher

transaction throughput—making them suitable for applications in banking and finance.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 198

www.rsisinternational.org

Key features relevant to onboarding and lending include:

 Smart contracts: Self-executing code that automates business logic, such as verifying identity or

approving loans.

 Decentralized Identity (DID) frameworks: Allow individuals to control and share their credentials

securely.

 Verifiable Credentials (VCs): Digitally signed claims that can be validated without revealing sensitive

data.

Prior Research and Industry Initiatives

Several studies and pilot programs have investigated the application of blockchain in financial services. In

particular, researchers have examined its role in:

 Shared KYC networks: Enabling multiple institutions to access and validate customer identities without

duplication.

 Trade finance: Improving transparency and reducing fraud through distributed documentation.

 Loan syndication and asset tokenization: Enhancing traceability and reducing settlement times.

For example:

 IBM has developed blockchain-based KYC utilities that allow banks to share verified identity information

securely, thereby minimizing repeated compliance checks.

 R3’s Corda platform has been tested in cross-border lending scenarios to improve trust among financial

intermediaries.

 Academic research, such as the work of Zwitter & Boisse-Despiaux (2020), emphasizes how blockchain

can enhance governance, compliance, and efficiency in regulated environments.

Despite this progress, most real-world implementations remain at the pilot or proof-of-concept stage. Moreover,

much of the existing literature focuses on broader applications of blockchain in finance (e.g., payments, capital

markets) rather than deeply examining onboarding and lending workflows as an integrated process.

Identified Gaps in Literature

While blockchain’s potential in financial services is widely acknowledged, there is limited research that explores

the end-to-end integration of DLT across both onboarding and lending workflows in a unified framework. Most

existing studies isolate components—such as KYC or loan disbursement—without examining how these can be

combined and automated via smart contracts and shared ledgers.

Furthermore, critical issues like data privacy, system interoperability, user control, and regulatory compliance

remain underexplored. Questions about the scalability of permissioned networks, governance models for multi-

party consortia, and the legal recognition of blockchain-based records continue to pose significant barriers to

adoption.

This paper seeks to address these gaps by proposing a comprehensive model that incorporates modern DLT tools

(e.g., DIDs, VCs, smart contracts) to reimagine onboarding and lending as secure, transparent, and interoperable

workflows. The following sections present the technological foundations, a proposed integration framework,

and an analysis of benefits, challenges, and future implications.

Technology Overview

The successful integration of blockchain or distributed ledger technologies (DLT) into onboarding and lending

processes requires a solid understanding of the technological components that underpin these systems. This

section outlines the key technological concepts—ranging from permissioned blockchain architectures to digital

identity tools—that form the foundation for secure and transparent workflows in financial services.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 199

www.rsisinternational.org

Permissioned Blockchain Architectures

Unlike public blockchains such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, which allow anyone to participate in the network,

permissioned blockchains restrict access to a consortium of approved participants. These networks are more

suitable for regulated industries like banking, where data privacy, governance, and compliance are critical.

Notable permissioned blockchain platforms include:

 Hyperledger Fabric: Developed by the Linux Foundation, it offers modular components such as

channels for private communication, pluggable consensus mechanisms, and identity management

features.

 R3 Corda: Designed specifically for financial institutions, it emphasizes point-to-point communication

and legal contract enforcement.

 Quorum: An enterprise-grade variant of Ethereum that provides advanced privacy controls and high

transaction throughput.

These platforms support controlled visibility, efficient consensus protocols (e.g., RAFT, Istanbul BFT), and

integration with external systems—making them well-suited for use cases like customer onboarding and loan

processing.

Smart Contracts

A central innovation in blockchain technology is the smart contract—self-executing code that automatically

enforces rules and logic defined by the stakeholders. In the context of onboarding and lending:

 Smart contracts can be used to automate KYC verification, flag inconsistencies, and enforce eligibility

criteria based on predefined rules.

 In lending workflows, they can automatically evaluate loan applications, check credit scores via APIs,

and trigger disbursement if conditions are met.

This level of automation reduces the reliance on manual decision-making, lowers the risk of human error, and

ensures consistent application of policies.

Decentralized Identity (DID) and Verifiable Credentials (VC)

One of the most promising advancements in identity management is the concept of Decentralized Identity (DID),

which enables individuals to control their own digital identities without relying on a central issuing authority.

Complementing DIDs are Verifiable Credentials (VCs)—digitally signed pieces of information (e.g., proof of

address, proof of employment) issued by trusted parties and stored either on-chain or off-chain. These credentials

can be:

 Presented by customers during onboarding,

 Verified by institutions using blockchain-based registries,

 Used across multiple financial providers without repeating the KYC process.

Technologies such as the W3C DID/VC standard, Hyperledger Aries, and Sovrin are actively being adopted in

this space.

Privacy and Data Protection Mechanisms

A common misconception is that blockchain is inherently incompatible with privacy regulations such as GDPR.

However, modern DLT systems offer multiple strategies to protect user data while preserving transparency:

 Off-chain storage: Sensitive documents (e.g., ID scans) are stored securely off-chain, while cryptographic

hashes are stored on-chain to prove authenticity.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 200

www.rsisinternational.org

 Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): These cryptographic methods allow one party to prove a statement is

true without revealing the underlying data. For example, a borrower can prove they meet income

requirements without revealing the exact amount.

 Selective Disclosure: DIDs and VCs allow users to share only the necessary information (e.g., age > 18)

rather than full documents.

Such mechanisms ensure that blockchain-based systems comply with regulatory frameworks while maintaining

data integrity and trust.

Integration with Legacy Systems

Modern financial institutions rely on complex legacy core banking systems that cannot be replaced overnight.

Therefore, a successful blockchain integration strategy requires:

 Middleware that translates between the blockchain layer and existing databases or APIs.

 Interoperability protocols that allow seamless data exchange between blockchain networks and traditional

systems (e.g., ISO 20022 for financial messaging).

 Oracles—trusted off-chain data sources that feed real-world information (such as credit scores or

regulatory updates) into smart contracts.

These technical bridges are essential for ensuring that blockchain-enhanced workflows can operate within

existing financial infrastructure without causing disruption.

METHODOLOGY

To explore the integration of blockchain or distributed ledger technologies (DLT) into onboarding and lending

workflows, this paper presents a conceptual framework designed for secure, transparent, and automated

processes. The methodology involves mapping the current challenges in traditional systems and redesigning the

workflow using blockchain components such as smart contracts, decentralized identity, and verifiable

credentials. This section outlines the proposed architecture, identifies key stakeholders, and details the step-by-

step flow of activities in both onboarding and lending processes.

Design Objectives

The framework is developed with the following core objectives in mind:

 Security: Ensure tamper-resistant data records and protect customer information using encryption and

identity controls.

 Transparency: Enable auditable transaction trails for all participants, including regulators.

 Efficiency: Reduce redundancy, eliminate manual processes, and automate decisions where possible.

 Compliance: Support adherence to regulatory standards such as KYC/AML, GDPR, and local lending

regulations.

 Interoperability: Enable seamless data sharing among diverse financial institutions and third-party service

providers.

Stakeholders and Network Participants

The blockchain-based workflow is built around a permissioned DLT network involving the following

participants:

 Customers: Individuals or businesses seeking to open accounts or apply for loans.

 Financial Institutions: Banks, credit unions, or fintech companies providing onboarding and lending

services.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 201

www.rsisinternational.org

 KYC/AML Service Providers: Third-party vendors responsible for verifying customer identity and

compliance status.

 Credit Bureaus: Entities that provide credit scores, credit history, and other financial risk assessments.

 Regulators and Auditors: Government agencies or auditors granted read-access to ensure compliance and

oversight.

Each participant operates a node on the network or interacts through a secure API layer with role-based

permissions to access and write data to the distributed ledger.

Onboarding Workflow on Blockchain

The onboarding process is restructured into a series of verifiable and interoperable steps on a blockchain

platform:

 Digital Identity Creation: A customer creates a decentralized identity (DID) using a mobile or web

application. This identity is anchored on the blockchain and tied to a secure cryptographic key pair.

 Document Submission & Verification: The customer submits identification documents (e.g., passport,

utility bill) via a secure portal. A KYC provider verifies these documents and issues Verifiable Credentials

(VCs)—digitally signed assertions that are cryptographically secure.

 Credential Storage and Access: The VCs are stored off-chain (e.g., in a digital wallet or credential vault),

with hashes recorded on-chain for validation. Financial institutions can access these credentials via smart

contracts, ensuring authenticity and integrity.

 Onboarding Decision: Once all credentials are validated, a smart contract executes the onboarding logic

(e.g., checks age, nationality, sanctions lists) and updates the customer's onboarding status on the

blockchain.

 Audit and Compliance Recording: Every step is recorded immutably on the ledger, with a time-stamped

trail accessible by regulators or compliance officers.

Lending Workflow on Blockchain

Once onboarding is complete, the lending process leverages blockchain to further automate risk evaluation and

decision-making:

 Loan Application Initiation: The customer initiates a loan application via the institution’s front-end

platform, which links to their verified digital identity.

 Smart Contract Activation: A smart contract is triggered to collect necessary data: income verification,

credit score (via API to credit bureau), and existing obligations (e.g., loans or liabilities).

 Automated Risk Assessment: The smart contract compares customer data against predefined lending

criteria (e.g., credit score threshold, debt-to-income ratio). Risk scoring algorithms can be embedded or

referenced externally.

 Loan Approval or Rejection: Based on the evaluation, the contract either approves or declines the

application, recording the decision immutably on the blockchain.

 Disbursement & Repayment Tracking: Upon approval, disbursement can be made traditionally or via

tokenized digital assets. The repayment schedule and payment events are also logged on-chain for

transparency and future reference.

 Regulatory Access: Regulators can access lending records in real-time or on request to audit decision logic

and ensure lending practices are fair and legal.

Technological Stack and Integration Layers

The following components support the proposed architecture:

 Blockchain Layer: Permissioned DLT such as Hyperledger Fabric or Corda.

 Identity Layer: Decentralized Identity frameworks like Sovrin, uPort, or Hyperledger Indy.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 202

www.rsisinternational.org

 Smart Contracts: Business logic implemented using platform-specific languages (e.g., Solidity for

Quorum, Chaincode for Fabric).

 API Integration: Middleware that connects external services such as credit bureaus, KYC providers, and

traditional banking systems.

 Front-End Interfaces: Web or mobile applications for customers and internal users.

SUMMARY

This framework illustrates how blockchain can be holistically integrated into onboarding and lending workflows,

replacing manual, siloed operations with a shared, automated infrastructure. The system offers enhanced

security, transparency, and operational efficiency while addressing the needs of both financial institutions and

regulators. The next section will analyze how these improvements translate into measurable benefits.

Security, Transparency, and Compliance Benefits

The integration of blockchain or distributed ledger technologies (DLT) into onboarding and lending workflows

introduces a transformative shift in how financial data is processed, verified, and managed. By leveraging key

features such as immutability, decentralization, and cryptographic verification, blockchain enables a system that

is inherently more secure, auditable, and compliant than conventional financial infrastructures. This section

outlines the specific benefits of adopting blockchain in terms of data security, process transparency, and

regulatory alignment.

Enhanced Data Security

One of the primary advantages of using blockchain in financial workflows is the significant improvement in data

security. Traditional onboarding and lending systems store sensitive customer information in centralized

databases, making them attractive targets for cyberattacks. Data breaches in financial institutions have exposed

millions of customer records in recent years, resulting in financial losses, legal liabilities, and reputational

damage.

Blockchain mitigates these risks through several mechanisms:

 Decentralized Storage: By distributing data across multiple nodes in a permissioned network, the risk of

single-point failure is drastically reduced.

 Cryptographic Hashing: Rather than storing sensitive data directly on-chain, only cryptographic hashes

of documents and credentials are recorded. This ensures that data cannot be tampered with or reverse-

engineered.

 Public-Key Infrastructure (PKI): Transactions and identities on the network are protected through strong

encryption using private and public keys, preventing unauthorized access or forgery.

 Role-Based Access Control: Permissioned blockchain platforms like Hyperledger Fabric or Corda allow

fine-grained access control, ensuring that only authorized entities can view or interact with specific data.

These features make blockchain a resilient and trustworthy system for handling critical operations such as KYC,

credit scoring, and loan approvals.

Increased Process Transparency and Auditability

Financial services are subject to strict regulatory scrutiny and must maintain detailed audit trails for all customer

interactions, especially those related to account opening and lending. In conventional systems, this information

is often fragmented across different departments or vendors, making it difficult to retrieve, verify, or trust in

real-time.

Blockchain inherently provides transparent and immutable records of every transaction or action taken within

the system. This has several advantages:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 203

www.rsisinternational.org

 Real-Time Audit Trails: Every operation, whether it’s a KYC verification or a loan approval, is recorded

on the blockchain with a time-stamp, digital signature, and unique transaction ID.

 Non-Repudiation: Once data is written to the blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted without consensus

from the network, reducing the risk of internal fraud or manipulation.

 Cross-Entity Traceability: When multiple organizations—such as banks, credit bureaus, and regulators—

operate on a shared blockchain network, the entire history of an identity or loan application becomes

visible (with appropriate permissions), fostering trust and accountability.

 Regulatory Visibility: Regulators and auditors can be granted “read-only” access to specific sections of

the ledger, enabling real-time or on-demand compliance verification without requiring manual data

extraction or reporting.

This level of transparency not only strengthens internal governance but also simplifies compliance with financial

regulations.

Streamlined Regulatory Compliance

The financial sector is governed by a complex web of regulations related to identity verification, anti-money

laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CTF), data privacy (e.g., GDPR), and fair lending practices.

Traditional compliance methods rely on paperwork, email trails, and manual checks—resulting in high

operational costs and compliance gaps.

Blockchain supports more efficient compliance through:

 Shared KYC: When customer identities are verified and stored as verifiable credentials, these credentials

can be reused across institutions with customer consent. This reduces the need for repeated KYC checks

and ensures that institutions remain compliant without duplication.

 Tamper-Proof Recordkeeping: Every compliance-related action—such as sanctions screening,

documentation uploads, or credit checks—can be logged on-chain, creating a comprehensive

compliance history that is auditable and trustworthy.

 Data Sovereignty and Consent Management: Through decentralized identity frameworks, users have

greater control over their personal data. They can grant or revoke access to specific credentials, helping

institutions comply with data protection laws like GDPR or India’s DPDP Act.

 Regulatory Reporting Automation: Smart contracts can be programmed to automatically notify

regulators when certain thresholds or flags are triggered (e.g., large transaction alerts, credit risk

exposure), reducing the manual burden of regulatory reporting.

By embedding compliance into the very infrastructure of financial workflows, blockchain transforms regulatory

obligations from afterthoughts into automated, integral components of system design.

Fraud Reduction and Trust Building

Fraud in onboarding and lending—whether identity fraud, documentation forgery, or loan stacking—is a

persistent challenge for financial institutions. Blockchain’s inherent features directly address these

vulnerabilities:

 Identity Verification Integrity: Because DIDs and verifiable credentials are issued and cryptographically

signed by trusted entities, forged documents or manipulated identities are far easier to detect and prevent.

 Credential Reuse Across Institutions: Once a credential is verified, it can be securely reused, reducing

the opportunity for bad actors to exploit gaps between organizations.

 Smart Contract Enforcement: Lending rules and approval logic codified into smart contracts leave no

room for subjective manipulation or procedural shortcuts, enhancing trust in the outcome of credit

decisions.

The cumulative effect is a more trusted environment where users, institutions, and regulators can interact with

greater confidence in the reliability of the system.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 204

www.rsisinternational.org

SUMMARY

By leveraging blockchain technology, financial institutions can dramatically enhance the security, transparency,

and regulatory compliance of their onboarding and lending workflows. The adoption of decentralized identity

frameworks, smart contracts, and immutable audit trails not only reduces operational risk and regulatory burden

but also paves the way for a more collaborative and efficient financial ecosystem. In the next section, the paper

will explore the challenges and limitations that must be addressed to make this vision a reality.

LIMITATIONS

While the integration of blockchain or distributed ledger technologies (DLT) into onboarding and lending

workflows offers significant advantages, the path to full-scale adoption is far from straightforward. There are

multiple challenges—technical, regulatory, organizational, and legal—that financial institutions must carefully

navigate. This section critically examines the limitations and practical obstacles that could hinder or delay the

deployment of blockchain-based systems in the financial services sector.

Regulatory and Legal Uncertainty

One of the most pressing concerns surrounding the use of blockchain in finance is the lack of clear regulatory

frameworks. While some jurisdictions are making progress in defining how DLTs should be governed, others

have yet to catch up. This ambiguity presents several risks:

 Legal Recognition of Blockchain Records: In many countries, blockchain-based data or smart contract

actions do not have the same legal standing as traditional documents or agreements. This raises questions

about enforceability in disputes or audits.

 Cross-Border Compliance: Financial institutions often operate in multiple jurisdictions, each with its own

rules for data residency, digital identity, and financial reporting. Ensuring that a blockchain

implementation is compliant globally is a complex and resource-intensive task.

 Evolving Regulations: New and evolving policies around data protection (e.g., GDPR, India’s DPDP Act,

or the EU’s MiCA regulation) may conflict with blockchain’s core features, such as data immutability and

decentralization.

Until regulators provide definitive guidance on how blockchain-based workflows should be structured and

governed, many institutions may be hesitant to invest heavily in DLT.

Scalability and Performance Constraints

Although permissioned blockchains have improved significantly in terms of speed and throughput compared to

public chains, they still face scalability limitations when processing large volumes of transactions, especially in

high-frequency lending environments or when dealing with large-scale onboarding programs.

 Transaction Latency: Smart contract execution and consensus mechanisms can introduce delays that

would not occur in centralized systems.

 Storage Overhead: Even with off-chain storage solutions, managing the metadata and hashes of millions

of credentials or customer files can place strain on network performance.

 System Bottlenecks: As more nodes are added to ensure decentralization and fault tolerance, the

complexity of maintaining consensus increases, which can lead to slower decision-making and

synchronization issues.

This makes real-time onboarding and instant loan approvals—key user expectations in the digital era—more

difficult to achieve at scale.

Integration with Legacy Systems

Most financial institutions rely on legacy core banking systems and third-party tools that were not designed with

blockchain in mind. Integrating DLT into these ecosystems poses significant technical and operational

challenges:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 205

www.rsisinternational.org

 Data Format Incompatibility: Legacy systems store data in formats that may not be easily translatable to

blockchain-compatible formats without heavy re-engineering.

 Middleware Dependencies: Integration often requires building complex middleware layers to bridge

blockchain networks with APIs, databases, and user interfaces.

 Operational Disruption Risks: Attempting to overhaul mission-critical systems can disrupt day-to-day

operations, posing a serious risk to business continuity.

Many banks adopt a hybrid approach—piloting DLT on the periphery (e.g., for KYC utilities or sandboxed

lending)—but transitioning to full production across an entire workflow remains difficult.

Data Privacy vs. Transparency Dilemma

Blockchain's inherent transparency and immutability can clash with data privacy laws and principles:

 Right to be Forgotten: Regulations like the GDPR mandate that users have the right to request erasure of

their personal data. Blockchain, by design, does not support deletion or alteration of on-chain records.

 Pseudonymity vs. True Anonymity: While blockchain allows for pseudonymous transactions, sensitive

personal information can still be linked to users if not properly masked.

 Selective Disclosure Complexity: While tools like zero-knowledge proofs and verifiable credentials offer

privacy-preserving methods, implementing them effectively and securely is complex and still under active

research.

Balancing the need for transparency (for audits and trust) with the demand for privacy (for user protection and

regulatory compliance) remains a key unresolved issue.

Governance and Trust in Consortium Models

Most blockchain applications in financial services rely on consortium-based models, where multiple institutions

co-manage the network. While this approach fosters collaboration and data sharing, it introduces its own set of

governance challenges:

 Decision-Making Complexity: Consensus on upgrades, policy changes, or dispute resolution can be slow

and politically difficult when many institutions are involved.

 Trust Among Competitors: Even with technical safeguards in place, financial institutions may be reluctant

to share sensitive customer or risk data with direct competitors.

 Funding and Maintenance: Sustaining a shared infrastructure requires equitable cost-sharing, clear roles,

and ongoing governance mechanisms—which can be difficult to coordinate and enforce.

If consortium governance is not clearly defined and trusted, the benefits of a shared DLT infrastructure may

never be fully realized.

User Adoption and Experience

Finally, the human factor cannot be overlooked. Blockchain-based workflows require end users and staff to adapt

to new paradigms:

 Customer Education: Not all users are comfortable managing digital wallets, consent permissions, or

decentralized identities.

 Staff Training: Bank employees must be trained to interact with new systems and understand smart

contract logic, digital signatures, and other unfamiliar concepts.

 User Experience (UX): The UX of blockchain applications still lags behind traditional fintech interfaces,

potentially discouraging adoption.

Failure to address these human-centered challenges can lead to resistance, errors, or abandonment of blockchain

initiatives.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 206

www.rsisinternational.org

SUMMARY

While blockchain offers a powerful and innovative approach to redesigning onboarding and lending workflows,

it is not a silver bullet. Regulatory ambiguity, scalability constraints, legacy system limitations, privacy concerns,

governance hurdles, and user adoption issues all represent significant barriers to successful implementation.

Overcoming these challenges will require coordinated efforts between financial institutions, technology

providers, regulators, and end users. The next section will explore real-world case studies and pilot

implementations that provide insights into how these challenges are being addressed.

Case Studies

As blockchain technology transitions from theory to practice, a growing number of financial institutions and

technology firms have launched pilot projects and proof-of-concept (PoC) implementations to explore its

potential in customer onboarding and lending workflows. These early experiments offer valuable insights into

both the opportunities and limitations of distributed ledger technologies (DLT) in real-world financial

environments. This section presents a selection of relevant case studies from around the globe, highlighting how

different stakeholders are experimenting with blockchain to enhance trust, efficiency, and compliance.

Case Study 1: Shared KYC via Blockchain – UAE KYC Blockchain Platform

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been at the forefront of blockchain innovation in government and finance.

One of the most significant initiatives is the UAE KYC Blockchain Platform, launched in collaboration between

the Dubai Economy Department and several major banks including Emirates NBD, HSBC, and Mashreq Bank.

Objectives

The primary goal was to streamline customer onboarding across multiple banks by enabling them to share

verified KYC data using a permissioned blockchain network.

Implementation:

 The platform uses blockchain to store and update verified KYC records in a shared ledger.

 Once a customer is onboarded at one institution, other participating banks can access the verified

information—with customer consent—without repeating the verification process.

 The system integrates with UAE’s existing national identity infrastructure and complies with local

regulations.

Outcomes

 Significant reduction in onboarding time, in some cases by over 50%.

 Lowered KYC-related operational costs.

 Improved customer experience, with fewer redundant requests for documentation.

 Enhanced regulatory reporting and auditability.

This case study demonstrates how a consortium-based model can work effectively in a regulated environment,

offering a blueprint for other jurisdictions.

Case Study 2: Lending Automation – R3 Corda & Credit Agricole

Credit Agricole, one of Europe’s largest banking groups, partnered with R3 to develop a blockchain-based

lending platform built on the Corda framework.

Objectives

The focus was to automate and digitize parts of the syndicated lending process—a traditionally complex and

document-heavy activity involving multiple banks and counterparties.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 207

www.rsisinternational.org

Implementation

 The project involved encoding lending agreements as smart contracts that could manage the terms,

disbursement, and repayment schedules.

 Participating institutions could view and validate transactions through a shared ledger.

 The system ensured that all parties had real-time visibility into loan status, repayment progress, and

compliance checkpoints.

Outcomes

 Improved efficiency and data accuracy in multi-party lending.

 Reduced time spent on document reconciliation and settlement processes.

 Enhanced transparency for auditors and regulators.

Though initially targeted at large syndicated loans, the underlying architecture shows promise for retail and SME

lending as well, particularly in automating credit decisioning and risk tracking.

Case Study 3: Decentralized Identity in Financial Services – Sovrin & Evernym

Evernym, a company specializing in self-sovereign identity, partnered with the Sovrin Foundation to pilot

decentralized identity (DID) solutions in financial services, with institutions like Barclays and Deutsche Telekom

participating.

Objectives

To empower individuals to own and manage their digital identities using blockchain-based infrastructure,

enabling secure and reusable identity verification during onboarding and loan applications.

Implementation

 Customers create and store their DIDs in secure digital wallets.

 Financial institutions issue verifiable credentials (e.g., KYC verification, employment status) after

verification.

 These credentials can be reused across platforms and shared with other financial institutions upon

consent.

Outcomes

 Reduced repetition in identity verification.

 Improved privacy and data control for users.

 Enhanced trust in data authenticity across institutions.

This pilot illustrates the viability of user-controlled identity frameworks, which could become foundational in

blockchain-based onboarding systems.

Case Study 4: Blockchain-Based Micro-Lending – AID:Tech in Emerging Markets

AID: Tech, a blockchain startup, implemented a pilot micro-lending and identity verification system in Tanzania

and Jordan, aimed at underserved populations.

Objectives

To enable financial inclusion by creating digital identities for unbanked individuals and providing them with

access to micro-loans and aid disbursement through blockchain.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 208

www.rsisinternational.org

Implementation

 Beneficiaries were issued digital IDs on a blockchain network.

 Micro-lenders could assess eligibility and disburse funds through smart contracts.

 All transactions were immutably logged, improving accountability and minimizing fraud.

Outcomes

 Enhanced access to credit for people without formal financial histories.

 Improved transparency in fund disbursement.

 Increased trust between donors, lenders, and recipients.

This case demonstrates how blockchain can support inclusive finance and extend lending services beyond

traditional markets.

Inclusive Micro-Lending via Blockchain: Mann Deshi Foundation & Algorand

 Overview: In April 2025, the Mann Deshi Foundation (a non-profit supporting rural women

entrepreneurs) partnered with the Algorand Foundation to roll out a blockchain-powered digital identity

and credit scoring solution across its network.

 Highlights:

o Issuance of verified digital identities and alternative credit scores on the Algorand blockchain.

o Replaces fragile, paper-based filing with smartphone-accessible verifiable records, even in

remote areas.

o Utilizes a web3 custodial wallet linked with India’s digital identity infrastructure, enabling

tokenized access to documents (e.g., via cryptographic hashes) and enabling formal credit access

for first-time borrowers.

 Impact:

o Scaled credit access for women entrepreneurs lacking traditional documentation or credit history.

o Enhanced accuracy, portability, and security of identity and credit data.

Tokenized Collateral Network: SIDBI & Infosys Pilot

 Overview: The Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), in collaboration with Infosys,

piloted a platform to tokenize collateral on a blockchain.

 Highlights

o Enables near-real-time sharing of collateral data among stakeholders.

o Prevents double pledging of assets using immutable tracking and smart contracts.

o Automates collateral verification, reducing manual oversight and administrative overhead.

 Impact

o Enhanced transparency and reduced fraud risks.

o Streamlined administrative processes and improved operational efficiency.

Shared KYC via Consortium Blockchain: BankChain Initiative

 Overview: BankChain, a consortium initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) in partnership with

Primechain Technologies, brought together multiple Indian and global banks to pilot blockchain

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 209

www.rsisinternational.org

applications for banking processes.

 Highlights:

o Launched shared solutions for KYC/AML, consortium lending, trade finance, asset registries,

and secure document handling.

o Initial pilots focused on shared KYC (Clear-Chain) leveraging Hyperledger Sawtooth and Intel

SGX to secure customer verification records across participating banks.

o Over time, expanded to include smart contracts, syndicate financing, and cross-institution

transactions.

 Impact:

o Reduced customer KYC duplication across banks.

o Promoted collaborative frameworks and operational trust among financial institutions.

RBI Innovation Sandbox: Blockchain-Enabled Lending & Digital KYC

 Overview: In its fifth innovation sandbox (2024), the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) included several

fintech entities and bank consortiums working with blockchain-based digital KYC and lending solutions.

 Highlights:

o Signzy and Epifi received nods for video-based KYC innovations.

o Finagg pilots blockchain-powered supply chain credit for vendors using tokenized invoices.

o IBDIC (Indian Banks’ Digital Infrastructure Company), backed by 18 banks, works on

blockchain lending solutions targeting MSMEs.

 Impact:

o Encourages institutional adoption of blockchain via regulatory support.

o Focuses on inclusive finance, transparent credit flow, and streamlined onboarding.

Frictionless Credit Platform by RBI Innovation Hub

 Overview: In mid-2023, the RBI Innovation Hub launched a national pilot for a public technology

platform enabling friction-free credit, leveraging multiple digital data sources—including e-KYC,

Aadhaar, land records, PAN validation, and account aggregation.

 Highlights:

o Aims to expedite loans such as Kisan Credit Cards, dairy financing, MSME credit, personal and

home loans.

o Uses smart contracts to automate sanctioning and disbursal processes.

o Intends to integrate blockchain elements for transparency and auditability.

 Impact:

o Sets foundation for a high-speed, data-driven credit ecosystem with improved accessibility for

underserved borrowers.

o Enhances regulatory traceability through immutable legibility of lending workflows.

Summary of Learnings

From these cases, several key insights emerge:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 210

www.rsisinternational.org

 Consortium and permissioned blockchain models are the most widely used due to privacy and regulatory

requirements.

 Decentralized identity and verifiable credentials offer substantial improvements in onboarding,

particularly in reducing redundancy and improving data portability.

 Smart contracts can effectively automate and enforce loan agreements, but require careful design to

reflect real-world legal terms.

 Projects that succeed typically feature strong public-private collaboration, a clear regulatory framework,

and well-defined governance structures.

While most implementations remain at the pilot or early production stage, they demonstrate tangible benefits in

efficiency, security, and trust—validating the long-term value of blockchain in these critical financial workflows.

CONCLUSION

The integration of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies (DLT) into onboarding and lending workflows

represents a transformative shift in how financial institutions manage identity verification, credit assessment,

and loan administration. As this paper has explored, the inherent properties of blockchain—such as

decentralization, immutability, and transparency—offer promising solutions to long-standing inefficiencies and

risks embedded within traditional financial processes. By fostering enhanced security, improving data accuracy,

and enabling seamless data sharing among authorized parties, blockchain has the potential to revolutionize the

speed and trustworthiness of onboarding and lending activities.

From the literature and technology overview to the analysis of real-world pilots, it is clear that blockchain’s

distributed architecture can reduce redundancies in customer onboarding through shared KYC platforms, lower

operational costs by automating lending workflows with smart contracts, and enhance regulatory compliance via

immutable audit trails. These improvements not only streamline internal operations but also significantly

improve customer experience by minimizing friction, reducing paperwork, and accelerating access to credit.

However, despite these compelling advantages, the journey toward broad adoption remains complex and

nuanced. As discussed in the challenges section, several technical, regulatory, and organizational hurdles still

need to be addressed. Issues related to data privacy, scalability, and interoperability with existing legacy systems

continue to pose substantial barriers. Moreover, the evolving regulatory landscape requires ongoing dialogue

and collaboration between regulators, financial institutions, and technology providers to establish clear standards

and frameworks that balance innovation with risk mitigation.

The case studies and pilot implementations presented, particularly from global leaders and emerging markets

like India, demonstrate tangible progress. Initiatives such as the UAE’s KYC blockchain platform, Credit

Agricole’s syndicated lending system on R3 Corda, and India’s BankChain consortium reveal how permissioned

blockchain networks and consortium governance models are driving initial success in controlled environments.

These pilots underscore the importance of collaboration—between banks, fintech firms, regulators, and

customers—to co-create systems that are secure, efficient, and user-friendly.

Looking forward, several trends suggest a positive trajectory for blockchain adoption in onboarding and lending.

Advances in privacy-enhancing technologies, such as zero-knowledge proofs and decentralized identifiers,

promise to reconcile transparency with data protection requirements. Increasing regulatory clarity and the rise

of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) may further accelerate blockchain-based innovations. Additionally,

growing awareness among consumers and employees about digital identity management and blockchain

applications is likely to reduce adoption resistance.

Nonetheless, it is important to recognize that blockchain is not a panacea. Its implementation must be carefully

tailored to specific use cases, ensuring that the benefits outweigh the costs and complexities. Hybrid architectures

that combine blockchain with traditional databases and APIs may offer the best path forward in the near term.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 211

www.rsisinternational.org

Equally critical is fostering a culture of innovation within financial institutions—one that embraces

experimentation, continuous learning, and cross-sector partnerships.

In conclusion, blockchain and distributed ledger technologies have the potential to fundamentally reshape the

landscape of onboarding and lending workflows by delivering unprecedented levels of security, transparency,

and operational efficiency. While challenges remain, ongoing pilot programs and emerging standards provide a

roadmap toward broader adoption. With sustained investment, regulatory support, and technological maturation,

blockchain can serve as a cornerstone for the next generation of secure, transparent, and customer-centric

financial services.

REFERENCES

1. Ali, M., Vecchio, M., Pincheira, M., Dolui, K., Antonelli, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2020). Applications of

Blockchain Technology in the Energy Sector: A Systematic Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Reviews, 134, 110362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110362

2. Allen, D. W. E., & Berg, C. (2018). Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard University

Press.

3. Atzori, M. (2017). Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?

Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v6_i1_p5

4. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., & Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data

Access and Permission Management. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Open and Big

Data, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/OBD.2016.11

5. Banerjee, S., & Chaudhury, S. (2020). Blockchain for Financial Inclusion in India: Opportunities and

Challenges. International Journal of Financial Innovation in Banking, 5(3), 189–208.

6. Bashir, I. (2018). Mastering Blockchain: Distributed Ledger Technology, Decentralization, and Smart

Contracts Explained (2nd ed.). Packt Publishing.

7. Beck, R., Avital, M., Rossi, M., & Thatcher, J. B. (2017). Blockchain Technology in Business and

Information Systems Research. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 381–384.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0505-1

8. Boucher, P., Dempsey, J., & Rohleder, T. (2017). Blockchain and the GDPR. European Data Protection

Law Review, 3(4), 333–338.

9. Chen, L., Xu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2021). Blockchain-Based Secure Data Sharing for Supply Chain

Management: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(6), 3949–3959.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3031362

10. Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain Technology: Beyond

Bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review, 2, 6–10.

11. Deloitte. (2019). Blockchain in Banking: How Banks Are Accelerating Adoption. Retrieved from

https://www2.deloitte.com

12. Dinh, T. T. A., Liu, R., Zhang, M., Chen, G., Ooi, B. C., & Wang, J. (2018). Untangling Blockchain: A

Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,

30(7), 1366–1385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2794353

13. Ganne, E. (2018). Can Blockchain Revolutionize International Trade? World Trade Organization.

https://doi.org/10.30875/4a73c2c1-en

14. Gupta, M., Seetharaman, A., & Raj, R. (2018). The Usage and Adoption of Blockchain Technology in

India: A Survey. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 21–25.

15. Hassan, S., & Kyriakou, H. (2019). Decentralized Identity Management: A Review of Blockchain-Based

Solutions. International Journal of Network Management, 29(5), e2064.

https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2064

16. IBM Institute for Business Value. (2020). Banking on Blockchain: How Banks Are Building a Real-

Time Global Payments Network. IBM Corporation.

17. Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives.

International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005

18. Lacity, M., & Van Hoek, R. (2021). The Financial Services Blockchain: Adoption Drivers and

Challenges. Journal of Financial Services Research, 59, 9–32.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)

ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025

Page 212

www.rsisinternational.org

19. Liang, X., Shetty, S., Tosh, D., Kamhoua, C., Kwiat, K., & Njilla, L. (2017). ProvChain: A Blockchain-

Based Data Provenance Architecture in Cloud Environment with Enhanced Privacy and Availability.

Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing,

468–477. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2017.62

20. Mann, A., & Sethi, R. (2022). Blockchain for Microfinance in India: Leveraging Digital Identity and

Credit Scoring. Journal of Indian Business Research, 14(4), 447–462.

21. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

22. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency

Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press.

23. Narula, R., & Jain, V. (2021). Blockchain Use Cases in Indian Banking Sector: An Empirical Study.

International Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(2), 134–150.

24. OECD. (2019). The Role of Blockchain in Financial Inclusion. Organisation for Economic Co-operation

and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c48b5c7-en

25. Pinna, A., & Ibba, S. (2018). A Blockchain-Based Decentralized System for Lending Transactions.

Future Internet, 10(9), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10090079

26. PwC. (2020). Time for Trust: Blockchain in Financial Services. PwC Global FinTech Report.

https://www.pwc.com

27. R3. (2020). Transforming Syndicated Lending with Blockchain. R3 Corda Whitepaper.

28. Sharma, S., & Sharma, D. (2021). Blockchain in Indian Banking Sector: Opportunities and Challenges.

International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 12(5), 15–29.

29. Singh, M., & Dutta, P. (2023). Blockchain-Enabled Lending: Case Studies from Indian Banks. Journal

of Financial Innovation, 9(1), 1–23.

30. Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is

Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin.

31. The Economic Times. (2024). RBI Innovation Sandbox: Fintechs Use Blockchain for Digital KYC and

Lending. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/digital-kyc-blockchain-

based-credit-solutions-part-of-rbis-fifth-innovation-sandbox/articleshow/112046934.cms

32. World Economic Forum. (2021). Blockchain Beyond the Hype: What Is the Strategic Business Value?

World Economic Forum White Paper.

33. Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., & Scarfone, K. (2019). Blockchain Technology Overview. National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8202