INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 537
β€œGreen Chemistry in the Fight Against Climate Change” Kpis,
Reporting and Carbon Accountability in Chemical Innovation.
Abhay Kaushik
Parishkar College of Excellence, India
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900054
Received: 09 Sep 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025; Published: 15 October 2025
ABSTRACT
The chemical industry, which is among the most vital industries to the global economy, contributes
significantly to climate change because of the emissions of CO2 due to fossil fuels and hazardous waste. Green
chemistry finds solutions toers by using the Twelve Principles by decreasing toxicity, energy requirements and
wastes. The Atom Economy, Carbon Efficiency, and Renewable Feedstock Utilisation are examples of such
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are used to measure the development and ensure compliance with the
regulatory (e.g., REACH, CSRD) and decarbonisation.
Poor standardisation and high transition costs form the barrier to success; predicted investment opportunities in
the circular economy became ESG investment and circular economy innovations. The implementation of KPIs
as a mandatory and inseparable component of measurable and reportable systems would help transform green
chemistry into a viable action plan that would render the industry synonymous with net-zero goals and
sustainable growth.
Keywords: Green Chemistry, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), Atom Economy, Carbon accountability,
Waste Reduction, Renewable Feedstock, Energy Efficiency, Regulatory Compliance (REACH,TSCA,ISO
14001)
INTRODUCTION
Climate Change and the chemical industry.
Modern global economy depends on the chemical industry (KΓ€telhΓΆn et al., 2019), the core product of which is
the contribution to pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, polymers and speciality chemicals. Still, it is a great
contributor to climate change as well since it is believed that about 10-12 per cent of all industrial pollution of
the world with regards to CO2 is being caused by it. The energy-intensive high-intensive industry and fossil
dependency (both processes and feedstock), production of highwaste and hazardous by-products (linear
production models) are the main issues leading to this consequence.
As countries are constructively looking forward to ambitious decarbonisation strategies with the help of the
framework schemes such as the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), the direction the chemical sector is taking at the moment is a direct disobedience to the global climate
goal. So as to discover the compromising point between industrialisation and environmental responsibility,
industry must be transformed drastically. This transition is supported scientifically by what is known as green
chemistry, the science which has been described in the Twelve Principles introduced by Anastas and Warner.
This set of principles encourages the design of chemical products and processes which is less toxic, use less
energy and resources use as well as enhancing safety and compatibility within their environment.
Technical substitution is not the only thing that green chemistry cares about; built-in performance assessment
is needed. As an illustration of this case, the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) may be perceived as the
mandatory instruments since such indicators as the atom economy, energy intensity, carbon emissions to each
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 538
unit of the product, the reduction of the hazardous wastes, and the fractions of the solvents covered by the
process of being taken care of are assessed.
At the same time, most ESG-compatible standards such as GRI, SASB and CSRD across the world are
currently demanding Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to become as inclusive as they can be in regards to carbon
disclosures. Such reporting systems will be enhanced with Green chemistry KPIs to increase transparency,
stimulate low-carbon research and development and augment carbon reporting. To exert as broad an
international impact as possible, they will need to be put into implementation at the Measurable, Reportable,
and Verifiable (MRV) systems level so that green chemistry would no longer be a visionary thought
experiment but an implementable and global solution to dismantling industry carbon emissions (Luis Alberto
de la Torre Vivar, 2025).
Defining Green Chemistry: Principles and Practical Relevance:
Principles of Green Chemistry:
Green chemistry is a science which aims at the optimisation of chemical materials and processes to reduce the
usage and generation of hazardous chemicals. It was created by Paul Anastas and John Warner and is informed
by 12 principles of environmentally Sound innovation, aiming at encouraging environmentally responsible
innovations. Some of these principles are atom economy, energy efficiency, use of renewable feedstocks,
utilisation of safer solvents or reagents.
Paul Anastas and John Warner later in 1998 released the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry (see Fig. 1.1).
These postulates guide the development of new processes and chemical products, and they are written against
all elements on the process life cycle, viz. raw materials, efficiency, safety, toxicity of reagents, and
biodegradability. In recent years, these values have been summarised in a more convenient form:
PRODUCTIVELY (Anastas & Eghbali, 2009).
(e.g., Fig. 1.1. Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry Framework).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 539
Practical Relevance
The principles of green chemistry may be practically and beneficially applied in numerous applications, such
as in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, electronics and even in the agricultural field. In order to minimise pollution
and utilise fewer resources, and produce safer and more eco-friendly products, the industries should operate
based on these principles. One can use green solvents, safe reaction conditions in synthesis, use renewable
resources in chemical synthesis, and develop biodegradable plastics; all such usages make use of green
chemistry(HΓΆfer and Bigorra, 2007). Moreover, such global issues as the problem of climate change and
depletion of natural resources may be solved with the useful effect of green chemistry because it gives an
opportunity to consider the process of chemical production more cyclic and more sustainable. 2. The Critical
Role of KPIs in Advancing Green Chemistry:
Adoption of green chemistry is not just about a scientific venture, but it is a working venture. It is obvious how
they can be done in general, but as to where to integrate them into the production systems, which can be scaled
up and how to continuously assess the ways they perform, the actual problem rests. The tendency to quantify
the results is important to maintain the degree of relevance, imitation and improvement of the production
cycle. According to this gap, KPIs provide pragmatic and strategic principles of measuring performance. KPIs
provide a systematic approach to measure green chemistry work and inefficiencies, in addition to putting a
context of sustainability on their overall work. Without these efforts, there is no unity in the efforts, and efforts
are not readily accessible. By incorporating KPIS in the operations procedures, companies can be assured that
the concept of green chemistry is not an abstract approach but an approach that is viable, measurable and
dynamic to sustainable progress in the scientific field.
KPIs create boundaries for green chemistry, which can be measured and an organisation can use to draw the
changes in the environment that can point out the extent of wastefulness and communicate any advancement
conveniently. Otherwise, the green chemistry theory is hypothetical and does not work after its application on
a large scale or when not invoked during corporate processes. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are
important metrics used in green chemistry to enable measurements of the progress and guarantee continuous
improvement [16].
(e.g., Fig. 1.2. KPI/Metrics and there Ideal Targets).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 540
Measuring Environmental Impact
The key subject of the Performance Indicators (KPIs) that can be funnelled toward the establishment of the
resource efficiency of a chemical process will be the following: the Atom Economy, the Carbon Efficiency and
the Waste Reduction [14]. Atom Economy is quoted as a percentage value of the ratios of the reactants used in
the productive products and more than the threshold, than the wastes. Carbon Efficiency monitors the ratio of
the atoms assigned to carbon atoms in the raw goods and finished goods in order to reduce green gases. Waste
reduction measures gauge the formation of by-products and promote the formation of more environmentally
friendly, efficient production routes.
Such KPIs enable the industries to detect their inabilities and change them to cleaner or even liquidfree
(assisted by catalysis, bio-based raw materials, or non-liquid flows). Another case is that the Carbon Efficiency
may be low, and then carbon sources will be replaced by renewable sources, and the level of waste will be very
high; this will imply that the process has to be redesigned. These KPIs will encourage continuous change so
that the chemical manufacturing is in line with the sustainability agenda goals, and it is economical.
Promoting Sustainable Practices Through KPIs:
It is also essential when fostering sustainability across the chemical sector, and Key Performance Indicators
(KPIs) are the sure way to present this order. These metrics include consumption of energy per unit of the
product and the level of use of renewable resources, which helps a business estimate and enhance the
sustainability of operations. An example is monitoring the rate of recovery of solvents to enable the firms to
track the transition process from the use of fossil-based solvents to the use of biodegradable ones. Such KPIs
not only draw attention to the efficiency of the use of resources, but they also inform decision-making
processes based on the concept of the circular economy. Continuous measurement of such parameters will
enable the organisation to minimally affect the surrounding environment (Lambin & Corpart,2018), decrease
carbon footprints, and achieve concrete progress in the long-term targets in sustainability.
Regulatory Compliance and Certification
One of the factors that has resulted in the adoption of green chemistry has been regulatory compliance. These
important governmental agencies and international institutions, along with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the European Chemicals Agency (REACH) and the ACS Green Chemistry Institute, develop
some principles and guidelines that ensure that chemicals are both safe and sustainable. The Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs) can especially come in handy when it comes to the enforcement of companies to run under
these regulatory conditions. Between the toxicity, atmosphere emissions, waste reduction, and resource
productivity measurements, the corporations can prove that they adhere to such regulatory acts as the REACH
(Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals) and the TSCA (Toxic Substances
Control Act). Documentation of the KPI is also applicable when it comes to the practice of certification, and
the same happens with ISO 14001, which refers to some good environmental management systems (O’BRIEN,
2008). Transparency in the reporting of KPIs not only has the merit of sweeping away the legal implications,
but it also makes the brand seem credible, and the stakeholders are inclined towards the brand.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 541
(e.g., Fig. 1.3. KPI use in Different Industries).
Carbon Accountability: The Next Frontier in Green Chemistry
Carbon responsibility no longer exists in the form of reporting on emissions in sustainability reporting. It has
acquired a greater burden: that of ownership of the causes of emissions, development of tangible reduction
strategies, and converting the heart of industrial processes to engineer out emissions altogether. Such a
transition is a strategic one in the green chemistry context: instead of trying to control reaction-based carbon
management, decarbonisation of molecules at the molecular scale [15].
To understand this change, one will want to look in conjunction with the classification of emissions of a scope
kind:
(e.g., Fig. 1.4. Type of Emission).
Even though companies have a high level of mandatory reporting of Scope 1 and 2 emissions, the Scope 3
emissions form a key aspect of the total carbon footprint produced by a chemical company, with its average
being above 70%. It implies that this is a significant, yet somewhat humble, subject matter of carbon
accountability.
Green chemistry has a direct impact on all three scopes of emissions since it provides sciencebased, practical
innovations:
Feedstock Substitution
Among the strongest ones, it is the replacement of relative to fossil-derived inputs by renewable or captured
carbon. Bio-based feedstocks and chemicals made out of CO2 not only emit less in upstream Scope 3
emissions but also provide carbon circularity. By way of illustration, the substitution of petroleum-based
ethylene with ethylene derived from bioethanol would reduce embedded emissions in polymers considerably.
Process Intensification
Both scope 1 and 2 emissions are able to be reduced to a minimum by the way a chemical reaction is designed
to consume minimal energy and solvent and have reduced steps. Ambient catalysis, one-pot synthesis and
solvent-free processes lead to a reduction of thermal load, energy demands through the reduction of process-
level emissions.
Onsite Renewable Integration
Decarbonisation of chemical manufacturing energy can be achieved through the introduction of solar, wind, or
hydrogen-based frameworks into plant installations. The green hydrogen collected in the process with the help
of electrolysis and renewable energy can serve as an alternative to fossil-only produced hydrogen to produce
ammonia and serve the refinery process, as well as the production of polymers. This movement will reduce the
scope 2 emissions and, in the long run, achieve energy resiliency (Singh, Anipeddi Manjusha and Lal, 2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 542
Molecular Design for Zero-Carbon Pathways
Green chemistry [22] goes ahead to accommodate the science of sorting the molecules and reactions in a way
that they do not leave a carbon footprint. These also involve the requirement of the benign starting materials
and carbon-sequestering routes and intermediates that are also recycled back into nature without emitting CO2.
Emission reduction is definitely not the right KPI in this regard, but the design is aimed at the removal of
emissions.
Hence, the carbon accountability could not have been a reporting issue, but it was a design issue. The way
through which a response to such menace can be achieved is already in the hands since the tools that green
chemistry offer are the very ones which are required to ensure that carbon responsibility is ensured on all
levels of chemical innovation, whether it is raw material, intermediate product or final product. In this manner,
the chemical industry will be able to transition into the leadership phase since it would prove to be one of the
most important agents of decarbonisation as a trend in the world.
Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing KPIs for Green Chemistry
It would be necessary to adopt effective Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of sustainability in chemical
production using adherence to the concept of green chemistry [19]. These are the best indicators to be of
assistance in quantifying the environmental performance, processing efficiency and compliance with this
regulation. However, despite the increasing trend of sustainable innovation, there exist enormous challenges to
the implementation of standardised KPIs in and among the chemical sector all over the world.
Challenges
Lack of Global Standardisation
Among the most evident challenges, there is a lack of a common framework for the green chemistry KPIs. The
requirements and sustainability benchmarks that differ according to various jurisdictions include the Corporate
Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in the European Union, climaterelated disclosure rules by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the framework by the International Sustainability Standards
Board (ISSB). This has led to attempting consistent performance measurement, and the extent to which this
can be measured is not achievable because of this fragmentation.
Cost Constraints in Transitioning Legacy Systems:
Old chemical plants are usually preoccupied with factors of throughput and cost-efficiency to the detriment of
being kinder to the environment. The shift to low-carbon or renewable-based processes comes at great costs as
new catalysts and a renewable supply chain of feedstocks are involved in addition to intensified processes.
Moreover, the implementation of monitoring systems capable of the measurement of atom economy, E-factors
and Scope 1-3 emissions is also not a straightforward practice but costly, in particular, to SMEs (waziri, 2022).
Inadequate Scope 3 and End-of-Life Data
Although Scope 1 and Scope 2 are more measurable by measuring direct energy and material flows, Scope 3
covers the extraction of raw materials upstream and the use of products downstream and other logistics, which
are very hard to quantify. This is aggravated by the emergence of data availability gaps and weak traceability
in cross-level supply chains. Also, the end of life of the chemical products is still technically problematic, thus
hindering the creation of good lifecycle-based KPIs[5].
Opportunities
Emerging Regulatory Drivers
The green chemistry KPIs are being fueled by the recent policy tools. Such real-world regulations are already
being integrated (or planned), including CSRD, SEC climate risks, and ISSB reporting, which include
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 543
sustainability indicators in mandatory reporting. These types of instruments are more concerned with the
transparency of environmental performance, and they are becoming more prone to KPIs, which are energy
intensity of an organisation, renewable feedstock percentage and carbon density per functional unit(Wachira,
Berndt and Romero, 2019).
Investor-Led Accountability
The latter is the financial sector and its provision of capital, placing a focus on ESG, which is performing
under much pressure. Asset managers and institutional investors are starting to rank a chemical company based
on its sustainability disclosure policies [4]. Failure to provide reports with the main KPIs may lead to delisting
of stock in ESG funds and even loss of confidence by shareholders. Good KPI reporting, on its part, results in
the increased ESG rating of a firm, the improvement of relations with the investor, and the opportunity to
realise the instrument of sustainable finance.
Strategic and Competitive Advantages
First-mover advantages are associated with the benefits of early green chemistry KPIs [20]. The businesses
that adopt strict measurement systems have an advantage in responding much earlier to the change of policy,
they can anticipate market demands, and they have an advantage in positioning their products based on
authentic green performance factors. Decision making conducted based on KPIs is helpful for internal
innovation as well, and it lets R&D concentrate efforts on lowcarbon processes, closed-loop systems, as well
as safer substitutes for chemicals.
CONCLUSION
From Green Vision to KPI-Driven Action
On the one hand, green chemistry, which used to be treated once as a certain form of progressive ideal, has
now evolved into a scientific and strategic necessity in the global strategy of confronting climate change [3].
As much as the chemistry industry is among the largest emitters and a core form of industrial value chain, it
has two functions, and they are the accountability of the past influence and the ability to lead the change
towards sustainability. Still, this transition cannot be created on visions; it must be measurable, as information-
based systems, which integrate the notion of sustainability into the heart of chemical creative activities.
This is the reason the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) can make a difference. According to examples,
among the metrics, there is atom economy, lifecycle carbon intensity, reduction of hazardous wastes, and
utilisation of renewable feedstocks, which are not just an application of reporting tools, but also the application
of tools. KPIs in mixtures with ESG framework, regulation (e.g. CSRD, SEC and ISSB), and scope 1-3 carbon
reporting will assist the chemical manufacturer to move the sustainability discussion to meaningful active
change(Zhang and Zhou, 2024).
Carbon metrics are no longer on the fringe-they form the core of the reengineering of the chemical processes to
meet net-zero goals. It requires integration of emissions control at the individual molecule stage of operations,
through intensification of processes, elimination of solvents, restructuring feedstocks, and in so doing creating
the reality of a circle of end-of-life planning. In this regard, KPIs become not merely a means of compliance
but that of innovation and strategic advantage.
The chemical industry is at a crossroads where international markets and regulatory bodies, and the flow of
investment, are already beginning to gravitate towards sustainable performance. The business of sustainable
manufacturing will be determined by individuals who can lead in the measurable activities according to
science, according to policy, and be open to the stakeholders. Through that, they will not only be in a position
to guarantee against the hazards of climate change, but will also redefine industry brilliance in the 21st
century[10].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 544
REFERENCES
1. Anastas, P., & Eghbali, N. (2009). Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Chem. Soc. Rev., 39(1),
301–312.
2. Development, 28(10), 3753–3756. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00428
3. Gbabo, E. Y., Okenwa, O. K., & Chima, P. E. (2022). Developing KPI-Driven Reporting Frameworks
for Governance in Regulated Infrastructure Environments. International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research and Growth Evaluation, 3(2), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2022.3.2.753-759
4. Giraud, R.J., Williams, P.A., Sehgal, A., Ponnusamy, E., Phillips, A.K. and Manley, J.B. (2014).
Implementing Green Chemistry in Chemical Manufacturing: A Survey Report. ACS Sustainable
Chemistry & Engineering, 2(10), pp.2237–2242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500427d.
5. Hernandez-Betancur, J.D., Ruiz-Mercado, G.J., Abraham, J.P., Martin, M., Ingwersen, W.W. and
Smith, R.L. (2020). Data engineering for tracking chemicals and releases at industrial end-of-life
activities. Journal of Hazardous Materials, [online] 405(124270), pp.124270–124270.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124270.
6. HΓΆfer, R. and Bigorra, J. (2007). Green chemistryβ€”a sustainable solution for industrial specialties
applications. Green Chem., 9(3), pp.203–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/b606377b.
7. Indicator for Standardizing Environmental Metrics for Chemical Sustainability. Frontiers in
Sustainability, 3(Volume 3 - 2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.834849
8. KΓ€telhΓΆn, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S., & Bardow, A. (2019). Climate change mitigation potential
of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 116(23), 11187–11194.
9. Lambin, A., & Corpart, J.-M. (2018). UN sustainable development goals and green chemistry, key
points for sustainably innovating at Roquette, a global leader in plant-based ingredients. Current
Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13(Volume 13), 137–139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.007
10. Lloyd, J. (2025). How to Catalyze a Safer and More Sustainable Chemical Industry. [online] Issues in
Science and Technology. Available at: https://issues.org/safer-sustainable-chemistry-industry-turner-
tickner-jacobs/ [Accessed 15 Aug. 2025].
11. Luis Alberto de la Torre Vivar (2025). Sustainability Assessment of Large-Scale Green Hydrogen
Production Systems for the Energy Transition - ProQuest. [online] Proquest.com. Available at:
https://www.proquest.com/openview/da0a1fcc2376e6c265173ebef8209ce5/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y [Accessed 15 Aug. 2025].
12. Metrics.” Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, Volume 35(Volume 35), 100606.
13. O’BRIEN, J. (2008). MEASURING REGULATION AND REGULATORY PERFORMANCE:
BENCHMARKING THROUGH KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Economic Papers: A Journal
of Applied Economics and Policy, 27(S1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2008.tb00442.x
14. Plugge, H. (2022). ChemESI (Chemical Environmental Sustainability Index)β€”A KPI (Key
Performance
15. Rossen, K., Ganesh, K., & Donsbach, K. O. (2024). Expansion of the Green Chemistry Principles:
Inclusion of Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Footprint. Organic Process Research &
16. Sheldon, R. A. (2017). Metrics of Green Chemistry and Sustainability: Past, Present, and Future. ACS
17. Singh, B., Anipeddi Manjusha and Lal, B. (2024). Decarbonizing Global Industry. CRC Press
eBooks,1stEdition(9781032726366),pp.197–222.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032726366-10.
18. SustainableChemistry&Engineering,6(1),32–48. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03505
19. Thormann, L., Neuling, U., & Kaltschmitt, M. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of the European
Green Deal for the chemical industry: An approach measuring circularity. Cleaner and Circular
Bioeconomy, 5(Volume 5), 100044.
20. Tucker, J. L. (2022). β€œThe Hidden Power and Competitive Advantage of Applying Green Chemistry
21. Wachira, M.M., Berndt, T. and Romero, C.M. (2019). The adoption of international sustainability and
integrated reporting guidelines within a mandatory reporting framework: lessons from South Africa.
Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-12-2018-0322.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 545
22. Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Pan, S.-Y., & Snyder, S. W. (2022). Catalytic processes to accelerate
decarbonization in a net zero carbon world. ChemSusChem, Volume15, Issue24(Volume15, Issue24).
23. waziri, aisha (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF MONITORING TOWARDS SMALL AND MEDIUM
ENTERPRISES PERFORMANCE: A CASE OF ARUSHA CITY COUNCIL AISHA WAZIRI
Masters of Science in Project Planning Management degree of the Institute of Accountancy
Arusha.[online]Availableat:http://repository.iaa.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/2058/AI
SHA_DISSERTATION-2022.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
24. Zhang, X. and Zhou, Y. (2024). Life-cycle carbon-intensity mapping for hydrogen-driven energy and
economy. Cell Reports Physical Science, [online] 5(9), p.102146.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.102146.
Declarations
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-
profit sectors.
Ethics Statement
This study did not involve human participants, animals, or the use of sensitive personal/biological data.
Author Contributions
The author (Abhay Kaushik) was solely responsible for the conception, design, analysis, and writing of the
manuscript. The author approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Dual Publication Declaration
This manuscript is original, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration elsewhere.
Authorship Confirmation
All listed authors meet authorship criteria and approve of the submission.
Permission for Third-Party Material
All third-party material used in this work has been properly acknowledged and reproduced with permission
where necessary.
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this study are available in the references cited. Further details may be provided by the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.