
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
performance in predictive accuracy (94.6%) and system reliability (96.2%) compared with existing telehealth
platforms, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying potential health risks before escalation. Survey results
from 305 respondents—comprising 7 doctors, 10 administrators, 187 patients, and 101 IT professionals and
students—showed strong agreement that the system is functional, secure, efficient, and user-friendly, with an
overall weighted mean of 3.99 (Highly Acceptable). Usability and security ranked highest, indicating users’
confidence in both system interaction and data protection. Overall, the system successfully integrates artificial
intelligence with healthcare monitoring to enhance decision-making and patient engagement.
CONCLUSION
The results confirm that the proposed AI-based monitoring system offers a significant improvement over existing
telehealth solutions in terms of accuracy, reliability, and usability. Its integration of the Naïve Bayes algorithm
enables effective risk prediction and supports preventive care through automated data interpretation. The strong
user feedback from both healthcare professionals and patients validates the system’s acceptability and readiness
for real-world application. Minor limitations, such as occasional system latency and reliance on stable internet
connectivity, were noted but did not compromise overall functionality. The findings also highlight that AI can
assist healthcare providers in monitoring patient conditions efficiently and securely. Therefore, the system can
be considered a valuable contribution to the growing field of AI-driven healthcare innovations.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that future system enhancements focus on optimizing real-time data processing, improving
reliability under high network traffic, and integrating additional AI algorithms for multi-disease prediction.
Regular system updates and cybersecurity audits should be implemented to ensure continued data protection and
compliance with healthcare standards. Training programs for doctors, administrators, and patients are also
advised to maximize the effective use of the system. Expanding the dataset to include diverse demographics and
health conditions will further refine the accuracy of predictions. Additionally, collaboration with medical
institutions can strengthen the credibility and clinical adoption of the platform. Continued research and testing
will help transform this system into a comprehensive, scalable solution for preventive healthcare management.
REFERENCES
1. Al-Turaiki, I., & Alshahrani, M. (2020). A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for predicting
diabetes prevalence. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1), 590–596.
https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110174
2. Bokolo, A. J. (2021). Use of telemedicine and virtual care for remote treatment in response to COVID-19
pandemic. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01596-5
3. Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare
Journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
4. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017).
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243.
https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
5. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017).
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243.
https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
6. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification
techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160(1), 3–24. IOS Press.
7. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification
techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160(1), 3–24. IOS Press.
8. Li, J., & Chen, H. (2018). Naïve Bayes classifier for predicting diabetes in healthcare applications.
International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 10(2), 34–40.
https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2018.02.05
9. Patel, J., & Desai, K. (2019). Performance analysis of Naïve Bayes and other machine learning algorithms in
healthcare data. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(39), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918726