
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
have limitations, including restricted patient mobility, poor compliance due to discomfort or inconvenience, and
challenges in resource-limited settings where access to specialized devices may be limited (Wu et al., 2008).
Furthermore, patients with complex comorbidities, such as deformities, obesity, or impaired balance, may require
customized solutions to achieve adequate offloading while maintaining functional independence. The patella
tendon bearing (PTB) orthosis, originally designed for the management of tibial fractures, offers a promising
alternative for offloading in the context of foot ulcers. The PTB orthosis redistributes body weight from the foot
and ankle to proximal weight-bearing areas, primarily the patellar tendon and tibial condyles, thereby minimizing
pressure on the distal limb. This biomechanical approach creates a protective environment for the ulcer site while
allowing patients to ambulate with reduced risk of further tissue damage. Modifications to the traditional PTB
design, such as custom-molded shells, adjustable straps, and lightweight materials, enhance its applicability to
diverse patient populations by improving fit, comfort, and functionality. These adaptations are particularly
relevant for patients with foot ulcers, who often present with unique anatomical and clinical challenges, such as
equines contractures, leg length discrepancies, or compromised skin integrity. A case study by Kala et al. (2019)
provides evidence of the effectiveness of a modified PTB orthosis in a related context. In their study, a 19-year-
old male with a distal tibial fracture, leg length discrepancy, equines contracture, and ankle instability was fitted
with a modified PTB orthosis. The device enabled independent ambulation without assistive devices, improved
gait parameters, and supported functional recovery by offloading weight from the distal limb (Kala et al., 2019).
Although this case focused on fracture management, the principles of weight redistribution and mobility
preservation are directly applicable to foot ulcer management, suggesting that a modified PTB orthosis could
offer similar benefits in this population. Despite its potential, the use of modified PTB orthoses in foot ulcer
management remains underexplored, with limited evidence on its efficacy, patient tolerability, and long-term
outcomes. This case study aims to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of a modified PTB orthosis
in the management of a foot ulcer in a single patient. By examining outcomes such as ulcer healing rates, pressure
offloading efficiency, gait improvement, and patient satisfaction, this study seeks to contribute to the growing
body of evidence on innovative offloading strategies. The findings may inform clinical practice, particularly for
patients who are unsuitable for conventional offloading devices or require tailored interventions to support both
healing and functional independence.
Foot ulcers, especially those with diabetes or neuropathy, are a major cause of morbidity and functional limitation
for adults. Chronicity is often due to persistent pressure, impaired sensation, and inadequate offloading with
insoles or footwear. Effective management requires innovative offloading solutions. The modified PTB orthosis
offers biomechanical advantages: it shifts up to 70% of body weight to the patellar tendon, substantially relieving
pressure at the ulcer site. While traditional PTB braces are common for fractures, their application for ulcer
management is less frequently reported in clinical orthotics literature. Orthotic devices not only provide stability,
limit the joint movement, and control foot deformity, but also relieve the load and evenly distribute the pressure
on the foot. As a result, orthoses can effectively heal foot ulcers and control the symptoms of Charcot arthropathy.
Wagner classified foot ulcers from Category 0-3 based on the loss of protective sensation, foot deformity, and
history of ulcer or ischemia[7]. Category 0 applies to cases where none of the following applies: Loss of
protective sensation, deformity, callus, weakness, or history of ulceration or ischemia. Such cases are dealt with
educating the patients on basic foot care and recommending conventional footwear. Category 1 solely involves
the loss of protective sensation, and the use of in-depth shoes or sneakers, non-molded soft inlays, and total
contact orthoses is recommended. Category 2 involves foot deformity along with the loss of protective sensation
and requires the use of in-depth shoes or sneakers, custom-molded foot orthoses, and external shoe
modifications, if necessary. Category 3 involves all three factors, namely loss of protective sensation, foot
deformity, and history of ulcer or ischemia, and requires custom-fabricated, pressure-dissipating accommodative
foot orthoses, with additional recommendations for inlay-depth, soft-leather, adjustable-lacing shoes, and
external shoe modifications, if necessary[7]. As illustrated above, the number of requirements for orthoses or
properly fitting footwear and the complexity of prescriptions increase with the rising risk of foot ulcers.
The aim of this case study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a custom-moulded modified patella tendon bearing
(PTB) orthosis in managing a refractory plantar foot ulcer in a 13-year-old male with diabetic neuropathy,