INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 823
Impact of Tembhu Irrigation Project on Aquatic Biodiversity of
Freash Water Wetland of Atpadi with Special Reference to Avifauna
and Habitat Destruction.
Shivaji M. Vibhute
Shrimant Babasaheb Deshmukh Mahavidyalaya, Atpadi, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100900081
Received: 17 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Sep 2025; Published: 22 October 2025
ABSTRACT
The Tembhu Lift Irrigation Project (TLIP), designed to deliver Krishna-river water to drought-prone Atpadi
taluka, has transformed regional water availability. While supporting local agriculture, its effects on the
aquatic ecosystem of freash water wetland of Atpadi especially avifaunal diversity and habitat structure are
poorly understood. This study assesses changes in water quality, vegetation (macrophytes, plankton), fish
assemblages, and bird populations tied to irrigation-induced hydrological alteration. Using comparative field
surveys, water-quality analysis, and avifauna counts from pre-project (20132015) baseline data through
present post-project flows, we examine biodiversity shifts and propose conservation recommendations.
Key Words: Tembhu, Avifauna, Conservation, Habitat.
INTRODUCTION
Atpadi in Sangli district receives only ~300–350 mm annual rainfall and has long suffered chronic droughts.
The Tembhu Lift Irrigation Scheme was restructured in 20162018 on an equitable model to supply piped
Krishna-water (~5,000  annually per household) to villages in Atpadi and Sangola Tehesil using closed
pipelines.
Atpadi Water reservoir, originally built in 1962 as a drinking and surface-water reservoir for the region, is a
critical aquatic habitat. Baseline studies in Sangli district reservoirs (e.g. Nimbavade) reported 44 bird species,
diverse phytoplankton (Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, etc.) and important carp fish
species ISCA.
This paper investigates how irrigation inflow alters lake hydrology, nutrient status, vegetation structure and
bird habitat suitability.
Fig. 1: Atpadi Wetland
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 824
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Atpadi Lake is one of the small water-body located in an undisturbed area of Sangli district between
17°40’97.41”N and 74°91’186.66”E (Fig.1). It shows great avian biodiversity which can attract the attention
of bird’s watcher and ornithologist. The lake is surrounded by vast area of deserted land on western side while
crop plantation is seen on eastern and southern side. Around this tank trees, herb and shrub is located with
some stretch of grassland area. However the lake itself fits in the definition of wetland ecosystem. The lake
was free of any type pollution as no human and industrial and other human activities polluting its water are
observed in it catchment area before commence of Tembhu irrigation Project. Previously the avifauna was
observed between June 2008 to May 2010. For observation of avifauna a binocular 10-12×50 Nikon binocular
was used while for photography Nikkon camera was used. Generally the avifauna was observed in the morning
between 6.00 am to 9.00 am in the morning and 4.00 pm to 6.00 pm in the evening. Identification of birds was
done using field guides [1. 2, 9] and searching on internet. Classification of birds was carried out with aid of.
Picture of study area was taken by using website Google earth and graphs were prepared by using the
Microsoft Excel.
Post initiation of Tembhu Irrigation Project the wetland study with special reference to avifauna was
conducted between March 2017 to February 2019. Contamination of water and change in physicochemical and
biological properties were observed due to influx of polluted water coming from Krishna river. The waste
water including domestic waste, industrial waste, etc. is observed coming from megacities like Satara, Karad,
Koyananagar and villages and towns situated in Krishna basin.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During present investigations 44 species of aquatic birds were recorded before initiation of Tembhu Project.
They were belonging 16 families. Incidence of birds of regular occurrence in year 2008- 2009 and 2009-2010
was listed in Table No. 1 Out of all these birds observed at the site, some are resident birds like Kingfisher,
Ibis, cormorant, Heron, Egret, etc. while some are migratory. They are Stork, Flamingo, Goose, etc. They
migrate from Northern hemisphere to India- South-Western Maharashtra and scatter at various wetlands like
this study area. The resident birds are observed in all the months of investigation period but the migratory birds
are observed mostly in the winter months. According to this the population of migratory birds dominated the
tank in winter as during these months the climatic conditions of northern hemisphere are harmful to these
birds; especially in getting food and shelter, while at the same time in India- south-western Maharashtra, this
season is best for getting food and shelter. The migratory species were winter visitors (Pandey 1993, Barman
et al. 1995, Prakash 1999, Jyoti et al. 2001, Kumar and Bohra 2002, Malhotra Manjeet Prakas et al. 2005, Man
Mohan Prakash 2005). The aquatic birds observed in the present investigations were grouped into Grebes,
Cormorants, Herons, Egrets, Ducks, Cranes, Coots, Waders, Terns, King Fisher, Stork and Ibis, etc..
Post Tembhu Irrigation Project when the study was conducted from March 2017 to February 2019 change in
physicochemical and biological properties were observed along with change in winter visitors and local
aquatic avifauna as shown in Table No.2. Due to continuous influx of water for irrigation purpose the
previously observed islands providing nesting and feeding grounds were found permanently submerged. Due
to overflowing of this irrigation tank fall in growth of aquatic micro and macrophytes was seen, thus by
destroying feeding ground of aquatic avifauna.
In the previous study species like Indian Pond Heron, Grey Heron, Giant Heron, Cattle Egret, Smaller Egret,
Little Egret, Large Egret, Brahminy Duck, Pin tail, Open Bill Stork, Spoon Bill, Black Winged Stilt, Little
Ringed Plover, White Breasted Kingfisher, Painted Stork, White Stork, White Necked Stork, etc. were seen
and are carnivorous. They were found feeding upon aquatic insects and their larvae, molluscs, crustaceans,
fishes, tadpoles, frog etc. The species of birds such as Common Pochard, Common Coot, Purple Moorhen,
White Ibis, and Black Ibis were Omnivorous. Their food consisted of fruits, grains, shoots as well as insects,
molluscs, worms etc. The species such as Common Teal, Spot Bill, etc. were Herbivorous. Their Food
consisted of fruits, grains, shoots of gram etc. The species such as Little Cormorant, Pied King Fisher, Small
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 825
Blue King Fisher and River Tern were Piscivorus. Their Food consisted of fish species such as Labeo angra,
Catla catla, Labeo Calbasu, Cirhinus fulungee, Cirrhinus Reba, Puntius amphibious, Mystus lamabaricus, M.
Montanus etc. (Dhindsa and Toor 1986, Yahya 1988, Bharucha and Gogte 1990, Patel et.al 1992, Urfi 1992,
Balchandran 1995, Salim Javed 1996 Sivaperuman and Jayson 2000, Rathore and Sharma 2000, Ramakrishna,
Muley and Vasanth 2001, Steimetz, Kohler and Soluk 2003, Srinivasulu 2004, Kedar and Patil 2005). In the
post initiation of Tembhu Irrigation Project major decline was observed in migratory visitors as well as local
aquatic avifauna due to various factors like destruction of feeding ground, change in availability of macro and
microphytes along with change in other physical and chemical parameters,
Present lake was extremely productive in terms of food, plants and animals, because the temperature of water
was often lower than that of the surrounding air, it acts as valuable feeding havens during the cold. In addition
it provides water for drinking, bathing and offers protection from land predators. It was not surprising therefore
that this freshwater habitat was previously home of many bird species and visited by many other bird species
not primarily adapted to aquatic life. Most of these are equally familiar in standing and flowing water, because
of their size and the tendency of some types of flock together. Populations of aquatic birds are more likely to
be found on lake, due to the amount of food needed to support them.
Table .1 Comparative Avifauna observed in study conducted from 2008-2010 and 2017-2019
Sr.No.
Common Name
Scientific Name
2008-2010
1
Little Cormorant
Phalacrocorax fuscicollis
2
Grey Heron
Ardea cinerea
3
Large Egret
Casmerodius albus
4
White Bellied Heron
Ardea insignis
5
Little Green Heron
Butorides striatus
6
Median Egret
Mesophoyx intermedia
7
Little Egret
Egretta garzetta
8
Painted stork
Mycteria leucophalia
9
Asian Openbill Stork
Anastomous oscitans
10
White Necked Stork
Ciconia episcopus
11
Eurasian spoon bill
Platelea leucorodia
12
White Ibis
Threskiornis melanocephalus
13
Black ibis
Pseudibis papillosa
14
Glossy ibis
Plegadis falcinellus
15
Greater Flamingo
Phoenicopterus rubber
16
Northern Pintail
Anas acuta
17
Common Pochard
Aethya ferina
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 826
18
Bar Headed Goose
Anser indicus
19
Brahminy Shelduck
Tadorna ferruginea
20
Spot Billed Duck
Anas poecilorhyncha
21
Wigeon
Aethya penelope
22
Common Teal
Nettapus coromandelianus
23
Common coot
Fulica atra
24
Little Ringed Plover
Charadrius dubius
25
Spotted Red Shank
Tringa erythropus
26
Marsh Sandpiper
Tringa stragnatilis
27
Common Green Shank
Tringa nebularia
28
Little Stint
Calidris minuta
29
Dunlin
Calidris alpine
30
Curlew Sandpiper
Calidris ferruginea
31
Black Tailed Godvit
Limosa limosa
32
Common Sandpiper
Actitis hypolecos
33
Purple Moorhen
Porphyrio porphyrio
34
White Breasted Waterhen
Amaurornis phoenicurus
35
Black Winged Stilt
Himantopus himantopus
36
Great Stone Plover
Esacus recurvirostris
37
Small Pratincole
Glareola lactea
38
River Tern
Sterna aurantica
39
Lessar Pied Kingfisher
Ceryle rudis
40
White Breasted Kingfisher
Halcyon smyrnensis
41
Small Blue Kingfisher
Alcedo atthis
42
Yellow Wagtail
Motacilla flava
43
White Wagtail
Motacilla alba
44
Forest Wagtail
Dendronanthus indicus
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 827
Figure. 4 - Comparative family wise abundance of avifauna in 2008-10 and 2017-19
Phalcrocoracidae,
1
Ardeaidae, 6
Ciconidae, 3
Threskiornithidae,
4
Phonicoepteridae,
1
Anitidae, 7
Rallidae, 1
Charadrinnae, 1
Scolopacinae, 8
Phasianidae, 2
Recurvirostridae,
1
Burhinidae, 1
Glariolidae, 1
Laridae, 1
Alcedinidae, 3
Motacillidae, 3
Fig. 2 Family wise distribution of Avifauna in 2008-
2010
Phalcrocoracidae
Ardeaidae
Ciconidae
Threskiornithidae
Phonicoepteridae
Anitidae
Rallidae
Charadrinnae
Scolopacinae
Phalcrocoracidae,
0
Ardeaidae, 6
Ciconidae, 2
Threskiornithidae,
4
Phonicoepteridae,
0
Anitidae, 0Rallidae, 1Charadrinnae, 1
Scolopacinae, 0
Phasianidae, 2
Recurvirostridae,
0
Burhinidae, 0
Glariolidae, 0
Laridae
, 1
Alcedinidae, 3
Motacillidae, 3
Fig. 3 Family wise distribution of Avifauna in 2017-
2019
Phalcrocoracidae
Ardeaidae
Ciconidae
Threskiornithidae
Phonicoepteridae
Anitidae
Rallidae
1
6
3
4
1
7
1 1
8
2
1 1 1 1
3 3
0
6
2
4
0 0
1 1
0
2
0 0 0
1
3 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2008-10
2017-19
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN APPLIED SCIENCE (IJRIAS)
ISSN No. 2454-6194 | DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS |Volume X Issue IX September 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
..
Page 828
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wish to express deep sense of gratitude to all peoples who helped me and Mr. Ashok Khade, of
Forest Office, Maharashtra Gov. for allowing me in the research area to carry out my research work.
REFERENCES
1. Ali S. Oxford University Press, 2002, Delhi.
2. Ali S, Ripely SD. Oxford University Press, 1987, Delhi.
3. Anon, Wetland values and functions. The Ramsar Bureau. Gland, Swittzerland. 2000, Pp. 20-25.
4. Bhattacharjee PC, Hazarika BC. Roosting sites and roosting birds at Gauhati Muncipal area. In Second
intenational symposium on life sciences. November, 14-16, 1985, NEHU Shillong.
5. Dayananda GY. Our Nature 2009, 7: 100-109.
6. Deepa RS, Ramachandra TV. Impact of urbanization in the interconnectivity of wetlands. Paper
presented at the National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resourses:
Retrospective and Perspective (XICXXI,1999), Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Banglore.
7. Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T. Christopher Helm 1998, London.
8. Grimmet R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T. Oxford University Press 1999, Delhi.
9. Hosetti BB, Somnath BC, Naik KL. Vol.1. Daya Publishing House, Delhi. 2001, pp. 269-289.
10. http://data.gbif.org/search.
11. Kumar P, Gupta SK. Our Nature 2009, 7:212- 217.
12. Padmavati A, Alexandar R, Anbarashan M. Our Nature 2010, 8: 247-253.
13. Sanjay GS. An ecological study of birds at Kokkare Bellur. WWF-India, New Delhi. 1993. Final
Report.
14. Sharma IK. Adverse effects of air, water and soil pollutions on flora and fauna of towns and villages of
Western Rajasthan. In Symposium on environment consciousness, problems of pollution and
conservation in Rajasthan 1982. October 1-3.
15. Singh JP, Roy SP. Some aspects of ecology of birds of Kawar Lake, 1990, Bihar.