INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Competencies of Bataan Peninsula  
State University Dinalupihan Campus’ Bachelor of Elementary  
Education Graduates as Basis for Extension Programs  
Candida S. Punla* and Rosemarie C. Farro  
College of Education, Bataan Peninsula State University, Dinalupihan, Bataan, Philippines  
*Corresponding Author  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 26 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruptions in the lives of people all over  
the world and the herculean challenge was how to continue teaching and learning beyond the usual face-to-face  
instruction, hence the release of CHED Memorandum Order (CMO) 04, series of 2020 containing the Guidelines  
on the Implementation of Flexible Learning. The aim of this study is to determine whether the Bachelor of  
Elementary Education (BEEd) program graduates of Bataan Peninsula State University Dinalupihan Campus  
(BPSU-DC) Batch 2022 have fulfilled the requirements outlined in CMO No. 74 series of 2017 (Policies,  
Standards and Guidelines for BEEd Program), while adhering to CMO 04 series of 2020 guidelines. This study  
uses the convergent parallel design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected simultaneously but  
analyzed separately, and the results are merged or integrated and allow for the collection of rich, detailed data  
and provides a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. The result of the quantitative and  
qualitative analysis indicates that the least learned competencies of the BEEd graduates include the Skills in  
Communication, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Use of Tools and Technology to Accelerate Learning and  
Teaching, Utilizing Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools, In-depth Understanding of Learners in  
various learning areas and that they need to improve their competencies in terms of Personal and Professional  
Development. Significant difference is not evident in terms of In-depth Understanding of Learners; Pedagogical  
Content Knowledge; Assessment and Evaluation; Communication, Higher Order Thinking, and Technology;  
Attributes of Model Teacher; Personal and Professional Development; thus, failing to reject the null hypothesis.  
The analysis's conclusion also suggests that the BEEd graduates' self-evaluations align with those of their  
cooperating teachers and coordinators, confirming the graduates' actual and true level of competency. Based on  
the results of the analysis, the following are suggested as Contextualized Input in Aid for development of  
Extension Program: Mentor-Mentee engagement, Personal Engagement in Learning, On-the-Job Training  
(OJT), Attending Training Seminars, Practicing for Improvement. Of the 122 respondents, 62 are the BEEd  
graduates-respondents, while 60 are Cooperating Teachers and Coordinators.  
Keywords: Competencies, BEEd Program, Extension Program  
INTRODUCTION  
The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented disruptions in the lives of people all over  
the world. It came unexpectedly where no one was ready enough to brace its impact on society. (CHED.CMO  
4, 2023)  
The Philippines in particular, faced a critical situation due to the rise of said health crisis. For higher education  
institutions, avoiding and limiting the risks of infection of the academic community has become a primordial  
concern. The herculean challenge then was how to continue teaching and learning beyond the usual face-to-face  
instruction. (CHED.CMO 4, 2023)  
Page 10314  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Hence, the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) then issued CMO 04, series of 2020 containing the  
Guidelines on the Implementation of Flexible Learning. In that CMO, it was very clear in guideline No. 5 that  
flexible learning should complement outcomes-based education approach which allows flexibility for the HEIs  
to employ various means of delivery and assessment as long as they can show the achievement of the set learning  
outcomes for each course or subject for the program. Further, guideline No. 14 also states that the implementation  
of flexible learning by HEIs for both undergraduate and graduate programs should still be guided by the  
principles of Outcomes Based Education (OBEs) and by applicable Policies, Standards and Guidelines (PSGs)  
to assure quality of teaching and learning. (CHED.CMO 4, 2023)  
Bataan Peninsula State University (BPSU) is one of the state universities in the country that continued to  
implement CMO 74, series of 2017 which indicates the PSGs for Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd)  
while also adopting the flexible learning. BPSU through University Memorandum 2020.0267 advised all faculty  
members to adopt flexible learning scheme through the implementation of Blended Learning as its modality of  
learning where the schedule is a blend of synchronous and asynchronous class. The graduates of Bachelor of  
Elementary Education Batch 2022 experienced two years of face-to-face learning and two years of blended  
learning where most of the specialization subjects were taken during their third and fourth year under the blended  
learning modality.  
This now poses a question of whether the competencies that they are supposed to have gained as stipulated in  
CMO 74 series of 2017 were not sacrificed with the unexpected shift brought by the pandemic where the shift  
is a challenge both to the students and the teachers.  
In a study on the Blended Learning During Pandemic Corona Virus: Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions by Aji,  
Ardin, Arifin (2020), they found out that there were challenges for the teachers in teaching through blended  
learning such as poor internet connection, time-consuming, and less experience while the students considered  
their challenges on poor internet connection and incomprehensible materials were considered as the problem  
that hampers their learning (Aji, Ardin, & Arifin, 2020).  
Competencies are deemed important in performing job responsibilities. Alamsyah, Sari, Utami, Adzni, Haris &  
Abdurohim’s (2023) study about Competence-Based Human Resource Development: A Literature Study in the  
Era of Information Technology and Digitalization underscores the modification in professional competence  
toward adaptability, communication and willingness to learn due to digitalization (Alamsyah, et al., 2023).  
Competence in adaptability and ICT skills as emphasized in CMO 74, Sec. 6.2e is more important than ever  
specifically because the teaching method of flexible learning may have affected the achievement of these skills.  
However, the underlying challenges in the CMO 04 flexible learning model likely hindered with the student’s  
ability to fully develop the mandated personal/ interpersonal and ICT competencies. As revealed in the study of  
Gocotano, Jerodiaz, Banggay, Nasibog & Go, challenges like loss of motivation and distractive learning  
environments were cited. These are stumbling blocks that can sternly hinder the development of personal and  
interpersonal competencies, like self-management, self-discipline and effective communication, which require  
engagement and focus (Gocotano, Jerodiaz, Banggay, Rey Nasibog, & Go, 2021).  
Anent to this, the study aims to investigate if the graduates of the BEEd program of Bataan Peninsula State  
University Dinalupihan Campus Batch 2022 have met the expectations as provided in CMO No. 74 series of  
2017 while adopting the guidelines of CMO 04 series of 2020.  
Determining if the skills were reached would assist the institution in assessing how well the aforementioned  
CMO was implemented, which ultimately would benefit the students by preparing them to take on the  
challenging tasks of teaching in the twenty-first century. In addition, it would assess how closely the university,  
in its capacity as a Teacher Education Institution, adheres to the CMO in spite of the disruption caused by the  
pandemic, ensuring that the BEEd Program will continue to support the university's goal of producing graduates  
who are competitive and community members who are empowered. More importantly, the results of this research  
could serve as a foundation for designing extension initiatives.  
Page 10315  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
The Commission on Higher Education (CHED), in response to the 21st Century Philippine Teacher Education  
Framework implements the shift to learning competency-based standards/ outcomes-based education as  
provided in the Guidelines for the Implementation of CMO No. 46 s. 2012. (CHED. CMO 46 s2012, 2023)  
With this, CHED released Memorandum Order (CMO) No. 74 series of 2017 otherwise known as the Policies,  
Standards and Guidelines (PSG) for Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) that specifies the ‘core  
competencies’ expected of BEEd graduates “regardless of the type of Higher Education Institution (HEI) they  
graduate from”. (CHED. CMO 74 s2017, 2023)  
The PSGs described in Section III of CMO No. 2 series of 2011 shall include the curriculum, program of study,  
course specifications, faculty and learning resources and support structures needed to attain learning  
competencies. (CHED. CMO 2 s2011, 2023)  
Competencies as defined in CMO No. 46 series of 2012 refers to the combination of knowledge, complex skills  
and behavior and attitude that enables an individual to perform specific tasks or role. (CHED. CMO 46 s2012,  
2023)  
Competencies is pivotal to the personal and professional success of an individual, as it will guarantee that  
necessary skills, knowledge and abilities are there, enabling an individual to surpass the roles expected of him/her  
efficiently and be able to contribute meaningfully to the success of an organization (Maharaj, 2023).  
Similarly, Sieck (2021) discussed competence as having the ability to be effective in performing a task or a job,  
knowledgeable and skilled enough to respond and solve complicated problems. He also emphasized that human  
resources in the modern workplace keep on innovating ways by experimenting with competence-based  
education. (Sieck, 2021)  
Likewise, Garcia-Alvarez, Vázquez-Rodríguez, Quiroga-Carrillo, & Caamaño (2022), concluded in their study  
that there is a need for higher educational institutions to incorporate “pedagogies for employability,” which is  
focus on strengthening the connection between the academic setting and work-related reality which will  
guarantee the graduates of appropriate transition to work environment. (Garcia-Alvarez, Vázquez-Rodríguez,  
Quiroga-Carrillo, & Caamaño, 2022)  
However, the pandemic had diverted and forced the education system to shift from the traditional face-to-face  
mode of teaching and learning to an alternative remote modality which eventually interrupted the usual delivery  
of education leading to the underachieved competency-based education, prompting challenges and limiting the  
students’ attainment of the needed competency.  
The study of Namkung, Goodrich, Hebert , & Koziot (2022), found that low instructional effectiveness were  
reported due to changes in delivery modes of instruction by teachers, suggesting that disruption in education  
projected to result in learning loss significantly.  
Similarly, disruptions in education due to COVID-19 pandemic and the transition to alternative remote delivery  
of learning widened the effect of digital divide and eventually widened the gap in the academic outcome,  
consequently worsened the persistence of academic challenges due to lack of approriate resources (Golden,  
Srisarajivakul, Hasselle, Pfund, & Knox, 2023).  
Although there are numbers of literature that provides different perspective on the impact of the interruption of  
academic activities due to COVID-19 pandemics, there remains little empirical discussions on structured  
mechanisms that measures the competency of the students, particulary during the later years of the disrupted  
educational contexts.  
The result of the study conducted by Punla & Farro (2021), implies that there is a need address the In-depth  
Understanding and Motivating Learners; Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Assessment and Evaluation;  
Page 10316  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Communication Skills and Technological Competencies; and Personal and Professional Development of the  
graduates. (Punla & Farro, 2021)  
In this light that this study, as followed-up research and explored the competencies of the graduates of Bachelor  
of Elementary Education who belong to the limited face-to-face modalities of Bataan Peninsula State University  
and attempted to disclose the gaps in the competency-based education amidst the pandemic.  
Objectives  
1. To describe the number of respondents in their respective groups:  
1.1 BEED graduates; and  
1.2 Cooperating teachers and Coordinators  
2. To describe the competence of graduates based on CMO No.74, s.2017 in terms of:  
2.1 demonstrating in-depth understanding of learners in various learning areas;  
2.2 manifesting meaningful and comprehensive pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of the different subject  
areas.  
2.3 utilizing appropriate assessment and evaluation and evaluation tools to measure learning outcomes;  
2.4 manifesting skills in communication, higher order thinking and use of tools and technology to accelerate  
learning and teaching;  
2.5 demonstrating positive attributes of a model teacher, both as an individual and as a professional; and  
2.6 manifesting a desire to continuously pursue personal and professional development  
3. To determine the significant difference in the ratings on competency level given by the graduates and  
Cooperating teachers and Coordinators.  
4. To explore the experiences and challenges of BEEd graduates, cooperating teachers, and coordinators on the  
underlying factors regarding the development, and demonstration of competencies of the graduates.  
5. To derive input on the findings of the study as basis for extension programs.  
Theoretical Framework of the Study  
This study is anchored on Siemens (2004) Connectivism Learning Theory, Bandura (1986) Social Cognitive  
Theory, and McClelland (1970) Theory of Competencies.  
Connectivism Learning Theory acknowledges that a significant portion of learning happens through technology  
and that being constantly connected allows us to make decisions about what we want to learn. The theory  
emphasizes that there is a constant change in knowledge and influenced by multiple contributory factors, such  
as peers, technology, and media which lead students to link their previous and current understanding together  
(Underwood, 2016).  
Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) on the other hand posits that learning is influenced by attention, retention, and  
motivation. The theory significantly emphasizes that individual’s learning is based on one’s own behavior. SCT  
suggests that learning happens when a learner is committed to make an effort to learn and modify their behavior  
(Bandura, 1986).  
Finally, McClelland's Theory of Competencies, or Competency Model is a framework for defining and  
identifying the essential skills needed to succeed in particular roles or careers. The model places equal emphasis  
on the value of technical proficiency and character traits like drive, assurance, and flexibility. This framework  
includes McClelland's Iceberg Model of Competencies, which conceptualizes competencies as having both  
Page 10317  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
visible and hidden components. The skills and behaviors that are readily apparent are the visible components,  
and the underlying motivations, character traits, and values that underlie those behaviors are the hidden  
components (Cripe, 2012).  
These theories are relevant to the current investigation because they provide the framework for identifying the  
competencies attained by the participants in relation to the competencies that are specified in CMO No. 74, series  
of 2017.  
METHODS AND MATERIALS  
Research Design: This study used mixed methods of research design, specifically the convergent parallel  
(concurrent) design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected simultaneously but analyzed  
separately, and the results are merged or integrated. This type of design allows for the collection of rich, detailed  
data and provides a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. (Alele & Malau-Aduli, 2023)  
The convergent parallel design was appropriately used to provide comprehensive view of the competencies being  
studied. By facilitating triangulation of findings through merging and corroborating the data sets, enable a differ  
understanding of the graduates’ competencies and educational gaps brought about by the pandemic.  
Complementary analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data and integration findings, the researchers were  
able to highlight areas of agreement and disparity between graduates’ self-assessment and teachers’ assessment  
of the graduates which is vital in understanding the competency of the graduates which then be the basis of an  
extension program.  
Population and Study Locale: The respondents are the Bataan Peninsula State University- Dinalupihan  
Campus Bachelor in Elementary Education Batch 2022 graduates as well as the program's cooperating teachers  
and coordinators. This included each graduate from the cohort, as it is anticipated that they have all acquired the  
necessary competencies after finishing the BEEd program. The quantitative survey covered all the Coordinators  
and Cooperating Teachers while participants for the study's qualitative phase were chosen according to set  
criteria. Through the many communication channels that were available, they were informed.  
Variables to be investigated: This research explores competence of graduates based on CMO No.74, s.2017.  
Instrumentation/Data Collection Tools: To collect quantitative data on the acquired competencies of the BEEd  
graduate-respondents and Cooperating teachers/ Coordinator-respondents, the researcher adopted the  
questionnaire of Punla and Farro (2021) which was utilized in their study “Are We There Yet? An Analysis of  
the Competencies of BEED Graduates of BPSU-DC.” (Punla & Farro, 2021)  
Statistical and Data Analysis Plan: Descriptive statistical tools including frequency counts, percentages  
describe the number of respondents in their respective groups, while mean and standard deviation was utilized  
to describe the competence of graduates based on CMO No.74, s.2017. Moreso, Independent Sample t-test was  
used to determine the significant difference in the ratings on competency level given by the graduates and  
Cooperating teachers and Coordinators.  
Ethical Considerations: To ensure the integrity of the study and to protect the respondents and the participants,  
the researcher had fully informed the respondents and the participants on the purpose, procedures, risk, and their  
right to withdraw at any given time. Respondents and participants were given equal treatment, avoiding any act  
of discrimination, more so, they were guaranteed that their personal information was safeguarded and kept  
confidential and made available to the public without their consent.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
Part I: Quantitative Analysis And Interpretation  
Table 1 presents the number of respondents when they are grouped accordingly.  
Page 10318  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Table 1 Profile of the Respondents (Number of Cases = 122)  
Profile  
Frequency  
Bachelor of Elementary Education Graduates 62  
Cooperating Teachers and Coordinators 60  
Percentage  
50..80  
Group  
49.20  
As can be seen on table 1, from a total of 122 respondents, 62 or 50.80% belongs to the group of BEEd graduates’  
respondents, while 60 or 49.20% are Cooperating Teachers and Coordinators.  
Of the 60 total number of Cooperating Teachers and Coordinators, 3 of them are Coordinators. It can also be  
gleaned from the data that the number of BEEd graduates is not equal to the number of cooperating teachers,  
this is because some of the Cooperating Teachers handled more than 1 student-teacher (graduate) during their  
Student-Teaching.  
Table 2 presents the respondents’ competency based on the expected competencies as stated at CMO No. 74,  
series of 2017.  
Table 2  
Respondents Level of Competency  
Indicators  
Mean  
SD  
Descriptive  
Interpretation  
A. Demonstrate in-depth understanding of learners in various 3.82  
learning areas  
0.78  
0.62  
0.70  
0.72  
0.85  
0.87  
0.73  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
B. Manifest meaningful and comprehensive pedagogical content 4.03  
knowledge (PCK) of the different subject areas.  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
C. Utilize appropriate assessment and evaluation and evaluation tools 3.92  
to measure learning outcomes.  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
D. Manifest skills in communication, higher order thinking and use 3.97  
of tools and technology to accelerate learning and teaching.  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
E. Demonstrate positive attributes of a model teacher, both as an 3.97  
individual and as a professional.  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
F. Manifest a desire to continuously pursue personal and professional 3.89  
development.  
Moderately High Level  
of Competence  
Overall Competency  
3.93  
Moderately  
High  
Level of Competence  
Legend: 4.205.00 High Level of Competence; 3.404.19 Moderately High Level of Competence; 2.603.39  
Average Level of Competence; 1.802.59 Low Level of Competence; 1.00-1.79 No Level of Competence  
The combined responses of the BEEd graduates and Cooperating Teachers/Coordinators in table 2 show that the  
BEEd graduates have moderately high level of competence (Mean=3.93). It can also be gleaned that the highest  
rating provided by the respondents is on ‘Manifest meaningful and comprehensive pedagogical content  
knowledge (PCK) of the different subject areas.’ (Mean=4.03) described as ‘moderately high level of  
competence,’ which implies that graduates are predominantly strong in understanding and delivering the subject  
matter, which is accordingly crucial for effective teaching.  
Page 10319  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Although slightly lower, it can also be gleaned that graduates have moderately high level of competency in terms  
of ‘Demonstrate positive attributes of a model teacher, both as an individual and as a professional’ (Mean=3.97);  
‘Manifest skills in communication, higher order thinking and use of tools and technology to accelerate learning  
and teaching.’ (Mean=3.97); Utilize appropriate assessment and evaluation and evaluation tools to measure  
learning outcomes.’ (Mean=3.92); and ‘Manifest a desire to continuously pursue personal and professional  
development’ (Mean=3.89).  
While considered moderately high, the competency in terms of ‘Demonstrate in-depth understanding of learners  
in various learning areas’ (Mean=3.82) is considered the lowest among the domain, an area where further  
development might be required. This is consistent with the findings of the study of (Punla & Farro, 2022) that  
there is a need for improvement in the graduates’ competency in understanding the learners’ diversity.  
Table 3 presents the significant difference in the ratings on competency level given by the BEEd graduates and  
Cooperating teachers and Coordinators based on the expected competencies as stated at CMO No. 74, series of  
2017 when respondents are grouped accordingly.  
Table 3  
Differences in the Competency of the BPSU Graduates  
Variables  
Group  
Mean  
SD  
t
Sig.  
Decisio Interpretation  
n on Ho  
In-Depth  
Understanding  
Learners  
BEEd Graduates  
3.70  
0.76  
0.79  
1.78  
0.08 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
of  
Cooperating Teachers 3.95  
& Coordinators  
Pedagogical  
Content Knowledge  
BEEd Graduates  
3.95  
0.63  
0.62  
1.42  
0.72  
0.21  
1.46  
0.76  
1.11  
0.16 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Cooperating Teachers 4.11  
& Coordinators  
Assessment  
Evaluation  
and BEEd Graduates  
3.88  
0.71  
0.69  
0.47 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Cooperating Teachers 3.97  
& Coordinators  
Communication,  
Higher  
Thinking,  
Technology  
BEEd Graduates  
3.95  
0.72  
0.72  
0.83 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Order  
Cooperating Teachers 3.98  
& Coordinators  
and  
Attributes of Model BEEd Graduates  
Teacher  
3.86  
0.84  
0.85  
0.15 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Cooperating Teachers 4.08  
& Coordinators  
Personal  
Professional  
Development  
and BEEd Graduates  
3.83  
0.86  
0.87  
0.45 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Cooperating Teachers 3.95  
& Coordinators  
BEEd Graduates  
3.86  
0.72  
0.73  
0.27 Failed to Not Significant  
Reject  
Overall  
Cooperating Teachers 4.01  
& Coordinators  
Page 10320  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
.05 level of Sig.  
The results of the analysis using the Independent Sample t-test, indicates that significant difference is not evident  
in the competency of the respondents based on the expected competencies as stated at CMO No. 74, series of  
2017 in terms of in-depth understanding of learners (t=1.78, p=0.08); pedagogical content knowledge (t=1.42,  
p=0.16); assessment and evaluation (t=0.72, p=0.47); communication, higher order thinking, and technology  
(t=0.21, p=0.83); attributes of model teacher (t=1.46, p=0.15); personal and professional development (t=0.76,  
p=0.45); when respondents are grouped accordingly, as provided by the p-values which are statistically greater  
than the alpha of .05. Further, the overall t-value of 1.11, significant at 0.27 indicates that there is not enough  
evidence to claim that there exists a significant difference in the average responses of the respondents when they  
are grouped accordingly, since the p-value is greater than the alpha of .05, thus, failing to reject the null  
hypothesis.  
The result of the analysis further implies that the self-assessment of the BEEd graduates coincides with the  
assessment of their cooperating teachers and coordinators and thus, validating the true and actual level of  
competencies graduates have. This implies that the graduate’s self-assessment of their competencies accurately  
reflects their actual preparedness as validated by their respective cooperating teachers and coordinators.  
The consistency of the assessment underscores the reliability of the findings as the basis for the crafting of an  
extension program, that will accurately reinforce program’s curriculum and developmental training consistent  
with the CHED’s mandated outcomes.  
Part 2. Presentation Of Qualitative Data  
To have an in-depth understanding of the acquired competencies of the BEEd graduates of BPSU, based on the  
expected competencies as stated at CMO No. 74, series of 2017, qualitative data were collected and analyzed  
using the thematic analysis through the utilization of the MAXQDA 2018.  
The analysis resulted in the emergence of two (2) major themes, and these are the Underdeveloped  
Competencies; and Coping Intervention to develop competencies.  
Underdeveloped Competencies  
Developing key competencies are growing in importance. Significant factors that strengthen competencies  
establish the capability of an individual to contribute to the development of his or her state or in creating his or  
her own path towards professional advancement. Developing essential competencies becomes a significant task  
for every individual and is crucial for lifelong learning.  
However, those who lack or have low competency levels frequently overestimate their own skills, which gives  
them the confidence to adopt awkward behaviors and make bad choices. Even worse, those who lack competence  
might not seek out training or services for skill-remediation because they are unaware of their shortcomings  
(Cherry, 2022).  
One of the competencies found to be underdeveloped based on the shared experiences of the participants of this  
study is Communication Skills. Participants believe that they have poor communication skills and have difficulty  
in communicating with other people.  
I think the other least of what I developed during the midst of blended learning is communicating with other  
people or what we call collaboration because we don't have really a physical interaction with our teachers and  
classmates. We can only talk through chats and virtual meet up and in that set up I found it a little bit difficult  
to express my own idea and knowledge when we have an activity (ST3).  
I think that the least developed that I'm not confident about is collaboration, because I'm a very shy person to  
the point that I can't communicate to other people that I'm not close with. It is difficult for me to express my  
ideas or knowledge (ST10).  
Page 10321  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
During Blended learning I am having difficulties in communicating, collaborating, and collecting and managing  
information because that time it is hard to find a stable internet connection and sometimes I don't have a gadget  
to use in online classes and the noisy surroundings around me got me distracted during our discussion that's  
why it’s difficult for me to communicate, collaborate, to collect and manage information during the blended  
learning (ST5).  
Aside from the communication skills which is considered underdeveloped by the participants, they also shared  
that the Use of Tools and Technology is one of the weaknesses they have.  
utilize appropriate technologies to achieve the learning outcomes. -It is because I'm not an expert or exposed  
to using Google classroom, Zoom, Google Meet etc. I'm not fully confident to use it in my class and achieve the  
learning outcomes, because I am new to these technologies, and we use face to face classes before the pandemic  
strikes (ST8).  
I think the use of different technological tools is the least competency that I have developed because, I'm not tech  
savvy, so when the class suddenly became online, I had a hard time adjusting (ST2).  
I think when blended learning start my least developed and not so confident in terms of being resourceful or  
digital gap. Access to resources because it's more on online class often requires students to utilize technology  
like laptop when doing a lesson plan, reports, presentation, thesis etc. (ST3).  
Another competency that the participant believes they lack is with regards to Higher Order thinking Skills.  
The competencies that least I developed during pandemic is my social and analyzing skills because the pandemic  
give us space from other people's and space from analyzing the actual sense of education (ST8).  
Critical thinking, sometimes its hard for me to evaluate the needed information (ST5).  
Likewise, it was found that one of the competencies they experience difficulties with is with Utilizing  
Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools.  
I am not confident when I am making an assessment for my students. I am not fully confident in creating table  
of specification. Even (though) I have the knowledge how to do it, I still not confident if I (am) doing it correctly  
(ST4).  
The utilization of appropriate assessment and evaluation and evaluation tools to measure learning outcomes  
was the competency I developed the least. My data connection slowed when we tackled this topic. It is the reason  
why I did not fully hear the whole discussion (ST9).  
The analysis of the shared experience of the participants revealed that Personal and Professional Development  
is one of the least developed competencies they have.  
I think the least thing I developed during blended learning during the pandemic was to manage my time properly.  
I always do my task the day before the submission because of all the tasks assigned to us (ST6).  
For me, developing personal time management skills. I often don't manage my time well, I often pile on tasks  
with too many things to finish, for that reason I find it difficult to finish them (ST9).  
Lastly, In-depth Understanding of Learners is considered as one of the least learned competencies of the  
graduates as mentioned by the participant.  
Demonstrate in-depth understanding of learners in various learning areas - this is the least / not so confident  
competences that I need to develop. I Experience blended learning, Virtual Classes, Examination, and I can say  
during those days I cannot fully provide a specific material / teaching material for a specific type of learner that  
always left behind the class because she is kinetic type of learner, It always bothers me because i know she's  
good, she has potential and I can't bring it out (ST5).  
Page 10322  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
The result of the analysis establishes the issues and concerns with regards to developing competencies such as  
the Communication Skills; Use of Tools and Technology; Higher Order thinking Skills; Utilizing Appropriate  
and Evaluation Tools; Personal and Professional Development; and In-depth Understanding of Learners  
indicates that there is a need for Higher Educational Institution to devote resources in mitigating the effect of  
underdeveloped competencies by providing innovative intervening programs and activities that would enhance  
the competency development as it is deemed important in producing competent and competitive future teachers.  
Coping Interventions to Develop Competencies  
Developing competencies involves an array of different opportunities that will allow development of knowledge,  
skills, abilities, and behaviors needed for an individual to perform at the level expected of him or her.  
As defined by KnowledgeWorks (2023), Competencies are lifetime knowledge, abilities, and attitudes that are  
applicable to learners of all ages and are meant to last beyond graduation day. These are the fundamental learning  
objectives required for success. It emphasizes interrelated knowledge, Skills and Attitudes which is applicable  
to any discipline. (KnowledgeWorks, 2023)  
Participants of the current study, openly suggests possible interventions in developing competencies suggested  
by the CMO No. 74, series of 2017, one of which is the Mentor-Mentee engagement.  
I (was) able to cope up with it by finding a solution about it also having a friend who support me in doing that  
specific task. Just think positively and (be) able to look for someone who willing to help you in your difficulties  
(ST1).  
Learn to communicate and listen to others. Involve yourself in different activities that you can also use in the  
future (ST3).  
I would suggest always seeking help from your friends, instructors, classmates, and someone with expertise in  
this competency (ST8).  
In order to support the students in developing the desired competencies it is paramount to engage them in a  
Mentor-Mentee sessions which is a proactive and interactive mentoring session which allow the students to  
experience an effective learning and development opportunities. Kearney (2020), reiterates that a mentor-mentee  
journey involves an investment that can be a chance for a personal development in the very least or it can lead  
to an experience of complete transformation of one’s life. (Kearney, 2020)  
The result of the qualitative analysis found out that having Personal Learning Engagement could possibly help  
individuals to develop the need competencies they need.  
To study hard and learn more in the subject areas that you recognized as difficult for you and enhance it more  
to help in developing the least developed competencies (ST3).  
I suggest, to develop your least competency, face it and do something for you to develop it (ST4).  
If you have a dream, you will do anything for that, therefore the intervention I would suggest is to keep studying,  
practicing speaking fluently and keep reading (ST6).  
Foster & Ambrose (2023) suggested that students who are engaged go beyond simply retaining information,  
rather, they strive further to understand what they are learning by applying critical thinking skills and delve with  
difficult concepts. Students who are engaged take interest to educate themeselves and take responsibility for  
their own education. (Foster & Ambrose, 2023)  
Another suggestion from the participants is the On-the-Job Training (OJT) which is a practical approach from  
where students acquire hands-on experiences and develop new competencies needed in the real work  
environment.  
Page 10323  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
On the job learning and training is an important way of developing competence. Participate in new projects /  
working groups in your workplace (ST3).  
On-the-Job Training according to Andreev (2023), is not always the norm, however OJT or Student Teacher-  
Internship can boost output and effectiveness by providing the learners with opportunities to have live-work  
experiences and acquire new skills and competencies needed in a real job. (Andreev, 2023)  
Further, another viable option for others to acquire and develop their own competencies and be able to establish  
and boost their confidence in performing the task ahead is Attending Training Seminars.  
I need to attend seminars about how to develop my ICT skills (ST1).  
Watch online tutorials or attend seminar/webinar (ST2).  
Attend training courses / seminars / conferences in and outside our school (ST3).  
Seminars about different strategies on how to boost the confidence of other people to collaborate. Intervention  
strategies means various techniques utilized in teaching a child a particular skill such as physical or verbal  
prompts and cues, visual aids, modeling, imitation, repetition, and task analysis (ST5).  
The result of the analysis also includes Practicing for Improvement as suggested by some of the participants. As  
suggested, practicing makes an individual develop competency and be at ease in performing a task.  
My suggestion is practicing the different technologies by using it and if I'm not understand it, I can watch in  
youtube and ask help in my classmates etc, that are more knowledgeable in using these tools to achieve what  
learning outcomes in lesson plan, so that I will be confident in teaching the learners (ST3).  
Model and practice estimating how long a task will take. Each student should have a time planner or calendar  
planner, so that they have a guide as to what order needs to be completed (ST7).  
If I would suggest I'm sure that it wasn't useful anymore but if this situation happen again, I suggest that practice  
your future educator to develop their confidence in a form of allowing them report in class and correct them in  
a proper manner if they gave a wrong information (ST9).  
Practice it with people who are available around me (ST10).  
Many learners have underestimated the value of practice in enhancing their professional abilities by thinking  
that academic knowledge acquired in the classroom is sufficient. Learning a new skill and performing better  
requires a bulk of practicing, feedback and making progress by trying to realize what works and what does not,  
and making necessary adjustments along the way (LSA Global LLC, 2023)  
Part 3. Covergence Of Findings Of Quantitative And Qualitative Analysis  
The result of the quantitative and qualitative analysis indicates that one of the least learned competencies of the  
BEEd graduates includes the Skills in Communication, Higher Order Thinking Skills, and Use of Tools and  
Technology to Accelerate Learning and Teaching. This is further elaborated in the shared experience of the  
participants where there are claims that because of the implementation of the blended learning, the learners have  
not fully developed their communication skills. It is also the blended learning that other participants are blaming  
as the reason behind why he or she thinks that the use of different technological tools is the least competency  
that he or she has developed. Similarly, participants believe they lack higher order thinking skills due to the  
situation they have during the pandemic where face-to-face interaction is limited.  
Furthermore, the findings of the quant-qual analysis established that BEEd graduates considered Utilizing  
Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools as another least learned competency and claimed that they are  
lacking skills and not confident in creating table of specifications and measuring the learning outcomes.  
Additionally, the result of the analyses signifies that BEEd graduates need to improve their competencies in  
terms of personal and professional development, as it was affected while on the blended learning during the  
Page 10324  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
pandemic. The participants believed that they lack skills in managing their time properly and having difficulty  
in completing assigned tasks.  
Moreover, it was considered by both the respondents of the quantitative survey and the participants of the  
qualitative interview that the in-depth understanding of learners in various learning areas is least learned  
competency they have, claiming that there exists a difficulty in contextualizing specific learning materials for  
specific type of learner.  
Contextualized input in aid for the development of an extension program for the Bachelor of Elementary  
Education program.  
Based on the results of the analysis, the following are suggested as Contextualized Input in Aid for development  
of Extension Program:  
COMPETENCY GAP (Least learned competencies)  
1. Communication Skills  
Intervention to address the gap  
Mentor-Mentee engagement  
Personal Engagement in Learning  
On-the-Job Training (OJT)  
Attending Training Seminars  
Practicing for Improvement  
2. Use of Tools and Technology  
3. Higher Order thinking Skills  
4. Utilizing Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools  
5. Personal and Professional Development  
6. In-depth Understanding of Learners  
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS  
Conclusions  
The study unpacks the competencies of the graduates of the BEEd program of Bataan Peninsula State University  
Dinalupihan Campus Batch 2022 who experienced two years face-to-face mode of learning and two years  
Flexible Learning using the indicators provided in CMO No. 74 series of 2017, the PSG for BEED Program  
while adopting the guidelines of CMO 04 series of 2020, Guidelines in the Implementation of Flexible Learning.  
Results pointed out that there is a need to improve the competencies of the graduates in terms of Communication,  
Higher Order Thinking Skills, Use of Tools and Technology to Accelerate Learning and Teaching, Utilizing  
Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools, In-depth understanding of learners in various learning areas and  
Personal and Professional Development.  
Results from the self-assessment of BEEd graduates align with the evaluations of their cooperating teachers and  
coordinators, indicating a true and actual level of competency. Statistical evidence also suggests that there is no  
significant difference in respondents' assessments of the graduates' competencies.  
The findings of the study strengthen the requisite of continuous development programs that focus on enhancing  
the competencies mandated by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) and the necessary curricular  
reforms as required by the commission which encourage technology integration and higher order thinking skills  
into educational curriculum.  
Moreover, the findings provide empirical evidence to advocate for extension programs and capacity development  
initiatives that coincide with the CHED’s reform agenda which will enhance the readiness of the graduates and  
eventually become globally competitive, and responsive teachers.  
Page 10325  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
RECOMMENDATIONS  
1. BPSU may demonstrate its commitment to continuously improve both faculty and students by sending them  
to seminars, trainings and workshops that will enhance the competencies of the students in terms of  
Communication, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Use of Tools and Technology to Accelerate Learning and  
Teaching, Utilizing Appropriate Assessment and Evaluation Tools, In-depth understanding of learners in  
various learning areas and Personal and Professional Development.  
2. Faculty members and curriculum planners may consider constructing curricula that will enhance students'  
abilities to measure learning objectives, create tables of specifications, and contextualize particular learning  
resources for different learner types.  
3. Both the students' extracurricular and co-curricular activities may be planned to help them improve their time  
management and task completion abilities.  
4. Faculty Extensionists may think about developing extension programs that will help close the competency  
gaps found in this study, enhancing graduates' capacity to carry out their duties effectively and helping their  
students acquire the most essential learning competencies.  
5. It is recommended that more study be conducted with the inclusion of various variables in order to confirm  
that the competences acquired are in line with CMO 74 s.2017. To determine how well CMO 74 s.2017 are  
implemented, comparative studies may also be carried out.  
REFERENCES  
1. Aji, W., Ardin, H., & Arifin, M. (2020). Blended Learning During Pandemic Corona Virus: Teachers'  
and Students' Perceptions. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistic and  
Literature, 8, 632-646. 10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1696.  
2. Alamsyah, K., Sari, A., Utami, P., Adzani, F., Haris, A., & Abdurohim, O. (2023). Competence-Based  
Human Resource Development: A Literature Study in the Era of Information Technology and  
Digitalization. ENDLESS: International Journal of Futures Studies , Vol. 6(No. 2).  
3. Alele , F., & Malau-Aduli, B. (2023). An Introduction to Research Methods for Undergraduate Health  
res-methods-health/chapter/5-5-mixed-methods-study-designs/  
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood  
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.  
Flexible-Learning.pdf  
10. Cherry, K. (2022, November 08). What Is the Dunning-Kruger Effect? Retrieved from Verywellmind:  
11. Cripe, E. (2012, October 17). The First Competency Model. Retrieved from Workitect.com:  
12. Foster, S., & Ambrose, K. (2023, January 23). Facilitating and assessing student engagement in the  
13. Garcia-Alvarez, J., Vázquez-Rodríguez, A., Quiroga-Carrillo, A., & Caamaño, D. (2022). Transversal  
Competencies for Employability in University Graduates: A Systematic Review from the Employers’  
Perspective. Education Sciences. doi:10.3390  
Page 10326  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
14. Gocotano, T. E., Jerodiaz, M. L., Banggay, J. P., Rey Nasibog, H. B., & Go, M. (2021). Higher Education  
Students’ Challenges on Flexible Online Learning Implementation in the Rural Areas: A Philippine Case.  
International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 262-290.  
doi:10.26803/ijlter.20.7.15  
15. Golden, A. R., Srisarajivakul, E. N., Hasselle, A. J., Pfund, R. A., & Knox, J. (2023, Aug). What was a  
gap is now a chasm: Remote schooling, the digital divide, and educational inequities resulting from the  
COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Opin Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101632. Epub 2023 Jun 12. PMID:  
37437380; PMCID: PMC10259090.  
16. Kearney, D. J. (2020, November 9). Mentors, Mentees, & The Rules of Engagement. Retrieved from  
17. KnowledgeWorks. (2023, January 10). What is a competency? Retrieved from KnowledgeWorks:  
18. LSA Global LLC. (2023, March 12). THE IMPORTANCE OF PRACTICE FOR IMPROVING SKILLS  
improving-skills-at-work/  
19. Maharaj, S. S. (2023, June 23). The importance of competency in an organization. Retrieved from  
maharaj  
20. Namkung, J. M., Goodrich, J., Hebert , M., & Koziot, N. (2022). Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic  
on Student Learning and Opportunity Gaps Across the 20202021 School Year: A National Survey of  
Teachers. Front. Educ.Front. Educ. 7:921497. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.921497  
21. Punla, C., & Farro, R. C. (2022, September). Are We There Yet? An Analysis of the Competencies of  
BEED Graduates of BPSU-DC. IOER INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH  
We-There-Yet-An-Analysis-of-the-Competencies-of-BEED-Graduates-of-BPSU-DC.pdf  
22. Sieck, W. (2021, September 17). What is Competence and Why is it Important? Retrieved from  
23. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved from itdl.org:  
24. Underwood, Z. (2016, August 22). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for Today's Academic Advising.  
Page 10327