INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Conceptual Framework
Theoretical Foundations
Agency Theory: The internal audit function serves as a monitoring mechanism to reduce information asymmetry
between management (the agents) and shareholders (the principals) (Adams, 1994). The role of agency theory
in Ethiopian banks is highlighted by the importance of firm independent audits, aligning interests and agency
costs.
Institutional Theory: Audit practices are shaped by organisational norms, regulatory frameworks, and external
pressures. According to global standards, the International Professional Practice Framework (IPPF) can be taken
as the effectiveness standard for audit practices (Mihret et al., 2010). The apex body, the National Bank of
Ethiopia, influences the adoption of audit practices in the Ethiopian context.
Communication Theory: The success of an internal audit is significantly dependent on effective communication
between auditors and auditees. Effective communication ensures that the results attained from audit activities
direct improvement efforts (Endaya & Hanefah, 2013). This is particularly relevant in hierarchical contexts like
Mekelle, where cultural and structural barriers may impede open communication.
Determinants of Internal Audit Effectiveness
This section gives a detailed examination of six determining factors, bringing together theoretical perceptions,
global evidence, and contextual relevance to Ethiopian private banks.
1. Organisational Independence: It is demarcated as the freedom of the audit function from operational
intrusion and its direct reporting to the board or audit committee (IIA, 2024). As per the agency theory,
independence reduces moral hazard and enhances credibility. In Ethiopia, however, executive influence often
compromises independence (Samuel, 2023). Without it, audit findings do not have any validity.
2. Competency of Audit Staff: Includes technical knowledge, skills for analysis, and professional certifications
that are required for assessing the complex nature of risks. According to Alzeban & Gwilliam, 2014, institutional
theory further emphasizes the relevance of such competencies with the inclusion of global standards that are
achievable through training. In Mekelle, although 72.3% of the respondents had more than 5 year of experience,
the limitation towards acquiring international certifications curbs substantial strategic input.
3. Quality of Audit Work: This encompasses the whole audit cycle of planning, fieldwork, reporting, and
follow-up done with rigor and in conformance with the IPPF standard (Cohen & Sayag, 2010). Communication
theory emphasizes that a quality report should be clear, evidence-based, and actionable. However, resource
constraints in Ethiopian banks often compromise follow-up activities.
4. Management Support: Demonstrates the commitment of the top executives through budgeting, policy
implementation, and follow-up on audit recommendations. According to Arena & Azzone (2009), agency theory
perceives support as indicative of congruence with governance objectives. Despite 62% of respondents reporting
poor responsiveness, perceived strategic importance remains high (mean 4.52), thus showing a gap between
intention and practice.
5. Internal Audit Charter: A formal document that defines the purpose, authority, scope, and reporting lines of
the audit function (Samuel, 2023). According to institutional theory, charters are used to attain legitimacy and
standardisation. Although charters exist in the surveyed banks, they are often outdated or misaligned with IPPF
standards, thereby weakening enforcement.
6. Audit Committee: This is an independent oversight body responsible for appointing auditors, reviewing
reports, and ensuring follow-up (Wondwosen, 2019). According to communication theory, the accountability of
the audit committee is to enhance dialogue between the auditors and the board. However, 55% of respondents
reported that audit committees are subordinate to management, limiting their effectiveness.
Page 10399