INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Technological Innovations in Food Waste Reduction: Case Studies  
from East and Southeast Asia  
Anas Rayyan Muhammad Shaifuddin., Amir Rayyan Muhammad Shaifuddin., Suhaily Hasnan  
Innovation Club, The Malay College Kuala Kangsar, Malaysia  
Received: 12 November 2025; Accepted: 25 November 2025; Published: 26 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This study presents a review on food waste in East and Southeast Asia. Specifically, it highlights some of the  
key technological innovations being implemented in East and Southeast Asia to reduce the food waste. This  
paper contributed additional knowledge on the factors that contribute to food waste and the use of technological  
innovations to reduce food waste in East and Southeast Asia. A literature search was done on technological  
innovations being used in food waste reduction and several case studies have highlighted successful  
implementation of these technological innovations in Asia, encompassing the years 2018 to 2024. Based on the  
review, it is noted that the key features of technologies and practices of the food waste management as well as  
the cooperation between government and private sectors are important. The limitation of this study is that this  
study is only focusing on a few Asian countries. Therefore, this paper suggests that in future, researchers can  
focus on other countries as well as other regions. The identification of these innovations may highlight the  
importance of technology in reducing food waste, thus motivating other researchers, government, and private  
sectors to study technological innovations in food waste reduction more intensively.  
Keywords: Technological innovation, food waste  
INTRODUCTION  
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the urgent need to enhance food security,  
and ultimately reduce food waste. Food waste includes organic wastes originating in food processing plants,  
thrown-out leftovers, expired ingredients, and unsold products, which is wasted at the retail and consumer levels  
(Joshi and Visvanathan, 2019; Kusuma, 2023). According to the United Nations Environment Programme’s  
(UNEP) Food Waste Index Report, almost one-third of global food production were wasted by households,  
retailers, restaurants, and other food services in 2022 (UNEP, 2024). This equates to 1.05 billion tons annually,  
which leads to nearly a trillion United States (US) dollars in economic losses per year (Wood, 2023). Hegnsholt,  
Unnikrishnan, Pollmann-Larsen, Askelsdottir and Gerard (2018) highlighted that the amount of food wasted  
each year will increase to 2.1 billion tons by 2030, which is equivalent to 66 tons per second. The Food and  
Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations expected that global population will grow to 9.7 billion  
by 2050, and food demand is projected to increase by 50 percent to 70 percent (FAO, 2020). Thus, it is imperative  
to prevent and combat food waste. In addition, food waste is a vital issue, representing a social distress, an  
economic malfunction and an environmental disaster (Martin-Rios, Hofmann and Mackenzie 2021).  
Although food waste is a worldwide problem, it is particularly alarming and pressing in Asian countries, in  
which hundreds of millions of people are living in hunger (Thiagarajan, 2024). It has been projected that Asia’s  
major cities alone will produce around 1.8 billion tons of food waste by 2025 (Agamuthu and Babel, 2023). The  
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) highlighted that East Asian countries  
experience considerable challenges in managing and reducing food waste, and are striving to tackle this issue  
(ICLEI, 2019). Alarmingly, three East Asian countries, namely China, Japan and South Korea, made up nearly  
30 percent of the world’s wasted food (Lu, 2023). In Hong Kong alone, 3,500 tons of food waste were generated  
daily, which accounts for 35 percent of the municipal solid waste, while 50 percent of them are recyclable. Since  
there is no legislation requirement for food waste separation for collection and recycling, disposing food waste  
at landfills is a common practice, which negatively affect environment, leading to pollution and climate change.  
Page 10445  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
In addition, food waste also includes waste of resources used in its production, harvesting, transportation, and  
packaging. Hence, immediate attention is required as it contributes towards the monetary losses of both  
individuals and national economies (Heidari, Mirzaii, Rahnama and Alidoost 2019).  
Meanwhile, Taiwan generates nearly 16.5 million tons of food waste each year, which is enough to feed millions  
of people (Heberlein, 2018). In 2022, approximately 1.327 kilograms (kg) municipal waste per person per day  
were generated, in which around 20 percent was organic waste which consists of food waste and garden  
trimmings (Singh, 2023). Although Taiwan was once known as “Garbage Island”, this country has significantly  
improved with a world-beating recycling rate of 55percent. Taiwan is also slowly becoming a global leader in  
solid waste recycling (Rapid Transition Alliance, 2019), although the country still struggles in battling food  
waste problems. Food waste costs Taiwan taxpayers billions of dollars a year, and it became the most significant  
source of air and water pollution (Heberlein, 2018). In Mongolia, about 2.9 million tons of solid waste is  
generated annually, for which most of them is not recycled. Solid waste in this country is disposed either in  
formal landfills or illegally dumped elsewhere (Brooks, 2022). Majority of the solid waste are food waste that  
comes from unserved food, leftover food, and unavoidable trimmings and peelings during preparation of the  
food, which has room for improvement. For many Asian countries, managing organic waste is a major challenge  
although it is biodegradable. Despite disease transmission risks, organic waste emits methane during  
decomposition, a gas that greatly contributes to global warming.  
Similarly, food waste is a major concern in Southeast Asia. The region accounts for 25 percent of global food  
waste, which is around 50 million metric tons of food each year (Food Cycle Science, 2023; Food Market Hub,  
2023). Five most significant contributors of food waste in Southeast Asia includes Indonesia (20.94 million  
tons/year), the Philippines (9.33 million tons/year), Vietnam (7.35 million tons/year), Thailand (5.48 million  
tons/year), and Myanmar (4.67 million tons/year). Listed just after Myanmar, Malaysia produces 2.92 million  
tons of food waste each year (UNEP, 2021). Solid Waste Management and Public Cleansing Corporation  
(SWCorp) reported that Malaysia produces 17,000 tons of food waste daily, in which 24 percent was still edible.  
This is equivalent to 4,080 tons of good food going to waste every day (The Star, 2024). In the UNEP report  
2021, Singapore was listed far away from its neighbouring countries, with only 0.47 million tons of food waste  
per year. However, TTG Asia Media reported that Singapore generates around 1.6 billion tons of food waste  
every year, which is worth 1.2 trillion US Dollar (Lee, 2023). One of the largest generators of food waste in  
Singapore are buffet lines in the hospitality industry. Although hotels are making commitments to reduce food  
waste, some are just unavoidable. Besides that, the impact of food waste reduction is much more prevalent in  
larger hotels with greater food chain.  
It is important to note that food waste is particularly prevalent in Southeast Asia due to its supply chain and food  
system infrastructure. Overall, in Southeast Asia, 30 percent of food is lost during production, and 35 percent is  
lost during post-harvest handling and storage (Agamuthu and Babel, 2023). Although food waste is still  
considerable in the urban areas, rural areas suffer a majority of losses at the earlier chain before reaching  
supermarkets or consumers, which is commonly referred as “food loss”. Food loss accounts for the losses that  
occurs in the post-harvest level, including processing, storage, packaging, transportation, marketing, and retail  
(Kusuma, 2023). Post-harvest loss can either be qualitative and quantitative loss. Qualitative losses include those  
affecting nutrient composition, viability or visual and aesthetic appeal, contamination, and breakage; while  
quantitative losses occur when the amount of the food reduces over time (World Economic Forum, 2023).  
Improper infrastructure for food storage and transportation is a significant contributor to food loss in Southeast  
Asia. For instance, around 20 percent of cereal grain is lost in Thailand, with the largest loss occurred during  
processing and storage. Meanwhile in the Philippines, about 33 percent of loss was incurred at the drying process  
of rice (Kusuma, 2023).  
The United Nation Sustainable Development Goal 12, target 12.3 (SDG 12.3) aims to halve per capita global  
food waste at both retail and consumers levels, and to reduce food loss across supply chain by 2030. However,  
according to the Global Hunger Index (GHI) 2018 report, 50 countries will fail to achieve the United Nation’s  
SDG of zero hunger by 2030 without any intervention due to food insecurity, climate change, poor governance  
(The ASEAN Post, 2019). A small number of countries are demonstrating progress in supporting such effort. In  
the East Asian region, Japan shows a significant reduction of 31 percent on food waste as compared to 2021, as  
the issue has been tracked consistently in the recent years (UNEP, 2024). In China, law on food waste has been  
Page 10446  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
adopted in 2021 with an aim of fostering food waste prevention. Therefore, companies should respond to  
disclosure requirements regarding waste management (Martin-Rios, Rogenhofer, and Alvarado 2023). As the  
issue of food waste involved all parties in the food chain, collaborative action amongst these parties are essentials  
for its success.  
Fortunately, the collaborative action is possible with the use of technology, that make changes plausible, easier,  
and faster (Birch, 2022). Technology and innovation are arguably one of the most important elements that  
encourage changes and improvements in food waste management. The emergence of innovative technological  
solutions offers promising strategies to combat food waste in the region. Despite improving business  
performance, adopting digital technologies and innovations in the food supply chains demonstrate significant  
efforts to overcome challenges in reducing food waste (Annosi, Brunetta, Bimbo, and Kostoula 2021). This  
article reviews some of the key technological innovations being implemented in East Asia and Southeast Asia,  
including smart inventory management systems, food sharing apps, and waste-to-energy technologies.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Types of Technological Innovations in Food Waste Reduction  
Several types of technological innovations have been introduced to reduce food waste in Asia, and this paper  
reviews the technologies that have been studied. It is suggested that Smart Inventory Management Systems,  
Food Sharing Apps, and Waste-to-Energy Technologies are among the innovations that have effectively reduced  
food waste in Asian countries. The following sections discuss how these technological innovations contribute to  
reducing food waste..  
Smart Inventory Management Systems  
One of the critical technological advancements in reducing food waste is the development and implementation  
of smart inventory management systems. These systems utilise artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning  
algorithms to optimise the inventory levels of food retailers and suppliers. By using AI in the inventory  
management system, business may reduce the risk of spoilage and wastage with real-time data analysis, such as  
demand forecasting, to help them make informed decisions about purchasing, storage, and shelf-life management  
to avoid overproduction. In Japan, for instance, several supermarkets have adopted AI-driven systems that  
predict demand more accurately, ensuring that fresh produce is stocked in appropriate quantities and reducing  
the likelihood of overstocking and subsequent waste. These systems do not only help in minimising food waste,  
but also enhance operational efficiency and profitability for businesses (Minai and Obayashi, 2019).  
In Thailand, AI-powered system developed by Smartway is used by stores in Bangkok and its surrounding areas  
to address food waste issue. This technology uses AI to identify products that reaching its expiration dates, apply  
20 percent to 40 percent discounts, and enhance ordering process to minimise waste. Besides reducing food  
waste, the system helps to boost customer purchasing power and improve store efficiency. The key features of  
the Smartway’s digitalised food waste management solutions include automatic detection through “GPS Short  
Date” system that identifies nearing-expiration products, optimal recycling that determines the most profitable  
recycling channel, automated discounts with distinct labels for nearing-expiration products, and improved  
ordering procedures for precision and waste minimisation (Retail Asia, 2024).  
Food Sharing Apps  
Food sharing apps have gained significant traction in Asia as an effective means to redistribute surplus food and  
reduce waste. These apps connect individuals and businesses with excess food to those in need, ensuring that  
edible food is not discarded. In South Korea, the app "No Food Waste" has become popular, enabling users to  
share information about surplus food available in their vicinity. In Japan, “Tabete” app, which was released in  
2018, is a free app that has helped to save 384,000 meals, accumulated 525,000 users, and partnered with 2,140  
shops (The Straits Times, 2022). This app also provides information to educate users with tips on reducing food  
waste, and recipes on their social media pages to promote food sustainability. Another app called “EcoBuy”  
provides awards in the form of reward points to consumers who use the app to buy items that are coming to the  
Page 10447  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
end of its shelf-life, with the aim of reducing food waste. There are about 30 designated food items in the app,  
including bread, sashimi, and milk (Wan, 2018). The app also provides latest information about the food items  
included, alert users of the best-before dates, consume-by dates, and recipes for food they purchased. Similarly  
in China, the "Meituan" app includes features that allow restaurants and consumers to share surplus meals at  
discounted prices. These platforms promote a community-centric approach to food waste reduction and support  
social initiatives aimed at alleviating hunger. All these apps enable suppliers to provide food banks that distribute  
unsold food to the needy families (Minai and Obayashi, 2019).  
In Southeast Asia, many start-ups have begun attempting to bridge the gap between food waste and hunger,  
making it easily accessible for those in need. For instance, “UglyFood” in Singapore redistributes ‘ugly’ produce  
food such as fruits and vegetables, that would otherwise been disposed of by retailers. The food that is considered  
ugly and not cosmetically attractive is wasted more compared to perfectly looking fruits and vegetables, as it is  
less likely to be sold by the stores or to be purchased by the consumers. Another app known as “Too Good to  
Go” connects food and beverages (F&B) outlets with consumers in order to redistribute excess and unsold food  
at the end of each day at a discounted price (Birch, 2022). The app is also being used in Thailand.  
In Malaysia, a Grub Cycle app known as “Grub Bites” was founded in 2016, allowing registered users to buy  
food from selection of listed restaurants at discounted prices. This initiative enables restaurants, cafes, and  
bakeries to sell off the over-produced food at bargained prices, while at the same time still able to make revenue,  
and more importantly help to reduce food wastage. The co-founder of the app, Redza Shahid, highlighted that  
2.2 million people can be fed with three meals a day from the food that the country generates (Ladrido, 2017).  
This increases the urge for the Grub Cycle team to grow with “Grub Groceries”, “Grub Homemade”, and “Grub  
Bag”. The “Grub Groceries” provides a platform for redistribution of rejected or surplus supermarket products  
at a discounted price, which is commonly around 20 percent below retail price. Meanwhile, the “Grub  
Homemade” offers pickled vegetables and fruits jams that are re-engineered by the company’s chef to extend  
the lifespan of a product. With “Grub Bag”, the company solely intent to assist low-income communities by  
providing necessities including rice, cooking oil, sugar, salt, and eggs, at only 50 percent of the retail price. In  
order to sustain the business with proper mechanisms, 10 percent of profits gained from the other three programs  
would be channed to help support this initiative.  
Waste-to-Energy Technologies  
Asian countries have also made strides in utilising waste-to-energy technologies to address food waste. These  
technologies convert organic waste into renewable energy, providing a sustainable solution to waste  
management. The most common option for managing food waste using this method in Asian countries is  
anaerobic digestion technology (Joshi and Visvanathan, 2019). It is widely recognised as more energy-efficient  
and environmental-friendly method of treating food waste (Zaini, Mohd Yatim, Dasiman, Abdullah and Mohd  
Zainuddin 2023).  
In Taiwan, 75 percent of its food waste would undergo underwater treatment to make pig feed. However, this  
approach is expensive and inadequate to solve high daily volume of organic waste. Although the country has  
long struggled to solve its food waste issue, the government has invested in anaerobic digestion facilities that  
processes food waste and produce biogas, which is then used to generate electricity. Additionally, Taiwan fights  
for its organic waste by addressing processing technologies through enterprises. Taiwan also uses "state-of-the-  
art" target enzyme technology to treat organic waste to produce high quality organic fertiliser. The innovative  
technology transforms waste into soil-enriching fertilisers within three hours instead of two to four months for  
traditional composting. Due to its quick processing time, the overall emissions using this technological  
innovation are less than 100 kilograms (kg) of carbon dioxide of organic waste, as compared to 450 kg for  
traditional composting and 750 kg for landfills (Singh, 2023).  
In China, black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) technology is used as bioconversion of organic wastes into value-added  
larval biomass products, such as nutrient-rich feed and organic fertiliser (Salam et al., 2023). This technique is  
a way of conversing terrestrial waste into biogas, biofuels, and other valuable converted products, which can be  
used in the agricultural field. Consistently, the same approach is also used in Taiwan, and being recognised as  
the best solution to organic waste problem in terms of reducing its carbon footprint (Singh, 2023). In Southeast  
Page 10448  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Asia, Singapore is one of the countries that adopted this method, whereby the residents can contribute their food  
waste to established black soldier fly facility, where the larvae act as a decomposer and break down the food  
waste into frass, which can be used as an organic fertiliser (TUM Asia, 2023).  
Consistently in Southeast Asia, waste-to-energy plants, which help to convert non-recyclable waste into energy  
using combustion to generate electricity are being constructed in Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia (Carruthers,  
2024). In Singapore, the National Environment Agency has implemented pilot projects that convert food waste  
into bioenergy and compost. These initiatives do not only reduce the volume of food waste sent to landfills, but  
also contribute to the generation of clean energy. In addition, better recycling practices are being encouraged in  
Singapore via the usage of “smart wastebins” or “smart bins”, which utilise increasingly sophisticated  
technologies such as AI and Internet of Things (IoT) (Carruthers, 2024). The bin uses variety of sensors and  
computer vision to identify items that are about to be thrown away and track the amount of food wasted. The  
food waste is later turned into energy or fish feed. However, based on the results of a recent poll conducted by  
Singaporean research company, Blackbox, only 5 percent of the participants confirmed that they recycled food.  
This indicates that there is sharp disparity between the scope of food waste problem and the level of commitment  
and involvement displayed by the public in addressing the issue (Diinsider Life, 2024).  
In Malaysia, MAEKO’s food waste composter, which uses a specially formulated composting enzyme to convert  
all types of organic waste into compost, are being placed in practice. This includes garden waste, raw kitchen  
scraps, cooked food waste, and also compostable food packaging. The portable composters can be used on-site  
such as at home, food service outlets, or event sites, as the biotech filtering system of the portable composters  
able to neutralises foul odours (Wood, 2023).  
Case Studies  
Several case studies have highlighted successful implementation of these technological innovations in Asia.  
In Japan, the government hopes to curb business-related food waste by over 20 percent between 2016 and 2030.  
Japanese companies are using AI and other technology to reduce the amount of food that never reaches  
consumers in response of combating food waste and to make production more efficient. Lack of human resources  
is one of the challenges faced by Japan, and it is expected that the working population will decrease by 40 percent  
by 2050. Thus, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Policy Partnership on Food Security argued that  
the use of AI and IoT for data collection and analysis are crucial for its food chain sustainability (APEC, 2019).  
The convenience store chain Lawson introduced an AI-based inventory management system that reduced food  
waste by 30 percent within the first year. Gaining an advantage, companies like Nichirei Foods and Calbee began  
at the top of the supply chain for a significant loss reduction. Nichirei Foods has developed and adopted an AI-  
powered system for detecting hard-to-remove bones in chicken meat and expected to reduce food waste from  
chicken processing by 80 percent in three years. Another issue faced by Japan in its initiative of combating food  
waste is with regards to the changes of weather (APEC, 2019). Despite this challenge, the leading tofu maker,  
Sagamiya Foods, is using data from Japan Weather Association to predict sales that are affected by temperature  
and managed to reduce annual cost by 10 million Yen (92,500 US Dollar) (Minai and Obayashi, 2019). Indeed,  
technology innovations improve food production and distribution, based on the analyses and forecast, and thus,  
help to reduce food waste in Japan.  
In South Korea, the city of Seoul’s partnership with the "No Food Waste" app resulted in the redistribution of  
over 100,000 meals within six months. The city made progress in 2013 when it fully implemented a mandatory  
“pay-as-you-waste" program for recycling food waste that complied with the National Government’s  
enforcement guidelines, which prohibited the discharge of food wastewater into the ocean (ICLEI, 2019). The  
city also implemented a volume-based food waste fee system, whereby food waste must be disposed using either  
designated collection containers with payment chips for pick-up or prepaid standard waste bags, or to an  
automated bins equipped with scales and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems that weight food waste  
as it is deposited, and charge residents using an ID card. The discharge food waste is collected by authorised  
transport and recycling business operators and converted into resources such as animal feed (64%), compost  
(33%) and bioenergy (ICLEI, 2019). 6,000 automated bins are placed in its capital city, Seoul, and the “pay-as-  
you-recycle" machines have reduced food waste in the city by 47,000 tons in six years. As a result of all these  
Page 10449  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
attempts, South Korea that once recycled only 2 percent is now recycling about 95 percent of its food waste  
(Broom, 2019).  
In Taiwan, the anaerobic digestion facility in Taichung processes 200 tons of food waste daily, generating  
enough electricity to power thousands of households. As Taiwan generates a huge amount of organic waste daily,  
anaerobic digestion through biological degradation processes can lead to reduction of waste and pollution, as  
well as regeneration of biogas energy (Heberlein, 2018). In Hong Kong, the facility for anaerobic digestion  
known as “O.PARK2” located at the northernmost district near Sha Ling, receives and processes about 300 tons  
of food waste per day, producing more than 45 GWh of electricity annually (Agrivert, 2023). The facility  
includes waste reception and waste pre-treatment system, anaerobic digesters, process to dewater the resultant  
digestate into a solid and liquid fraction, process to turn the solid fraction into granulate fertiliser, wastewater  
treatment plant, centralised air pollution control, biogas production and conditioning, as well as heat and power  
cogeneration plant. The treatment procedures are made custom to handle varying amounts and rates of organic  
waste, depending on the quantity and quality of food waste. The facility is designed and built to be energy  
efficient, minimise energy consumption, and export surplus energy to the public electricity grid.  
In Malaysia, SWCorp started a pilot project of converting food scraps into organic fertiliser for crops in every  
state of Malaysia. Starting in 2023, the main objective of this initiative is to ensure that all food waste are not  
sent to the landfills. Food waste and scraps are placed into a machine, which are gradually combined with  
sawdust and rice husks for 48 hours. Being a Muslim-majority country, Malaysia collects even more food waste  
during the holy month of Ramadan, where bazaar is everywhere, and huge amount of food are thrown away  
daily. The Pahang state director of SWCorp, Mr. Sharudin Hamid, takes the initiative to place mobile machines  
at a park in the heart of state capital Kuantan, where it is easily accessible by the public. He claimed that on  
average, 25kg of scraps are being processed daily during Ramadan (Today Online, 2024). With this initiative,  
out of 14 states in Malaysia, Pahang reported the highest reduction of food waste in 2023 with 13.01 percent,  
followed by Kedah (5.57%), Perlis (3.71%), Johor (3.28%), and Melaka (2.49%) (Leong, 2024).  
Meanwhile in Singapore, food waste from the local hawker centres has been converted into biogas to generate  
electricity since November 2021. About 150 kg of food waste were being collected daily from only 60 stalls at  
the East Coast Lagoon Food Village (Hong-Yi, 2021). The food waste is then transformed into electricity that is  
enough to power two phone charging stations for public use, and 31 wall fans at the hawker centre. In addition,  
the generated electricity is also used to power the anaerobic digestion system that converts the food waste into  
biogas and fertiliser. Although anaerobic digester has been used in some hotels in Singapore such as Marina Bay  
Sands, the NEA highlighted that the initiative to include this technology as an on-site treatment solution at the  
hawker centre is to close the food waste gap at its main source generators. In fact, the project at the hawker  
centre also integrates sub-systems such as waste bin loader, sorter, shredder, and feeder to enhance the system’s  
performance. At the same time, the National University of Singapore (NUS) in collaboration with the National  
Parks Board (NParks), is working on a project of potentially using nutrient-rich liquid residues from digested  
food waste, known as digestate, as pathogen-free fertilisers around East Coast Park (Hong-Yi, 2021).  
CONCLUSION  
Technological innovations play a crucial role in addressing the food waste crisis in Asia. Smart inventory  
management systems, food sharing apps, and waste-to-energy technologies offer practical and sustainable  
solutions to reduce food waste and promote environmental and social well-being. By continuing to invest in and  
adopt these technologies, Asian countries can lead the way in creating a more sustainable and food-secure future.  
In fact, all these technologies are the key in addressing poverty, hunger, and climate change challenges.  
According to the United Nations, 870 million undernourished people could be fed by saving just one quarter of  
global spoiled food (Willige, 2023). In general, local governments in Asia are actively looking for ways to  
minimise food waste as part of their mission to lead citizens towards a sustainable future. Cooperation between  
government and private sectors play a vital role in ensuring the success of adapting technology innovation in the  
initiatives of reducing food waste. Meanwhile, technology has been essential in upgrading food waste  
management system, and maximising recycling rates. Importantly, the long-term solution to reduce food waste  
should begin from its source, and reintegrate the waste into the ecosystem. More research on technological  
advance for innovation are encouraged to improve the effectiveness of food waste disposal treatments.  
Page 10450  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Malay College Kuala Kangsar, Perak, Malaysia for  
facilitating this research project.  
REFERENCES  
1. Agamuthu, P., and Babel, S. (2023). Waste management developments in the last five decades: Asian  
perspective. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for Sustainable Circular Economy, 41(12).  
2. Agrivert. (2023). Hong Kong anaerobic digestion food waste facility O.PARK2. Available at:  
3. Annosi, M. C., Brunetta, F., Bimbo, F., and Kostoula, M. (2021). Digitalization within food supply chains  
to prevent food waste. Drivers, barriers and collaboration practices. Industrial Marketing Management,  
4. APEC. (2019). Reducing food waste by using information and communications technology (ICT) and  
innovative technologies. APEC Policy Partnership on Food Security, 1-47. Available at:  
5. Birch, K. (2022). How technology is tackling the world’s food waste crisis. Sustainability. Available at:  
6. Brooks, J. (2022). Measuring our food waste. Available at: https://www.eternal-  
7. Broom, D. (2019). South Korea takes the lead in food waste recycling. CommonWealth Magazine.  
8. Carruthers, M. (2024). Why Southeast Asia’s growing waste problem presents huge opportunity for  
9. Diinsider Life. (2024). Why food waste crisis is a critical environmental problem in Southeast Asia?  
10. FAO. (2020). The state of food and agriculture. Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Food and  
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://dx.doi.org/10.4060/cb1447en  
11. Food Cycle Science. (2023). A complete overview of the food waste crisis in Southeast Asia. Available  
at:  
12. Food Market Hub. (2023). Reducing food waste in Southeast Asia: How Food Market Hub can help  
achieve food security goals. Available at: https://www.foodmarkethub.com/blog/reducing-food-waste-  
13. Heberlein, T. (2018). Taiwan food waste – Right resource, wrong approach. Topics. Available at:  
14. Hegnsholt, E., Unnikrishnan, S., Pollmann-Larsen, M., Askelsdottir, B., and Gerard, M. (2018). Tackling  
the 1.6-billion-ton food loss and waste crisis. The Boston Consulting Group, Geneva Switzerland.  
15. Heidari, A., Mirzaii, F., Rahnama, M., and Alidoost, F. (2019). A theoretical framework for explaining  
the determinants of food waste reduction in residential households: A case study of Mashhad, Iran.  
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 6774-6784.  
16. Hong-Yi, T. (2021). East Coast Lagoon Food Village in trial to generate electricity from food waste.  
17. ICLEI. (2019). Food waste: An alarming issue East Asian cities striving to tackle. Available at:  
Page 10451  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
18. Joshi, P., and Visvanathan, C. (2019). Sustainable management practices of food waste in Asia:  
Technological and policy drivers. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 538-550.  
19. Kusuma, N. (2023). Food loss and waste in Southeast Asia. Available at:  
20. Ladrido, P. (2017). Grub Cycle: Eliminating waste whilst feeding low-income families. Available at:  
21. Lee, R. A. J. (2023). Singaporean start-up leverages technology to tackle food waste in hospitality  
22. Leong, A. (2024). KL & Negeri Sembilan lead Ramadan food waste, Yet Malaysia sees Overall decline.  
23. Lu, A. (2023). Packaging & technology innovations to help address the global issue of food waste. Asia  
24. Martin-Rios, C., Hofmann, A., and Mackenzie, N. (2021). Sustainability-oriented innovations in food  
waste  
management  
technology.  
Sustainability,  
13,  
210.  
Available  
at:  
25. Martin-Rios, C., Rogenhofer, J., and Alvarado, M. S. (2023). The true cost of food waste: Tackling the  
management challenges of the food supply chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 131, 190-195.  
26. Minai, H., and Obayashi, H. (2019). Japan battles food waste in production with AI and weather data.  
27. Rapid Transition Alliance. (2019). Taiwan’s Transition – from Garbage Island to Recycling Leader.  
28. Retail Asia. (2024). Central Food Group trials AI-powered system to reduce store food waste. Available  
29. Salam, M., Zheng, L., Shi, D., Huaili, Z., Vambal, V., Chia, S. Y., Hossain, M. N., Mansour, A., Eliw, M.,  
Dong, M., Shazadi, A., and Ullah, E. (2023). Exploring insect-based technology for waste management  
and livestock feeding in selected South and East Asian countries. Environmental Technology &  
30. Singh, N. (2023). Firms battling organic waste crisis. Taipei Times. Available at:  
31. The ASEAN Post. (2019). ASEAN start-ups are tackling food waste. Available at:  
32. The Straits Times. (2022). Apps turning restaurant leftovers into cheap meals take off in Asia. Available  
at:  
33. Thiagarajan, K. (2024). Why Asia must solve food waste to hit its environmental goals. South China  
Morning Post.  
34. Today Online. (2024). Malaysian state converts Ramadan food waste into fertiliser. Available at:  
35. TUM Asia. (2023). Food waste: Push towards a circular economy. Available at: https://tum-  
36. UNEP. (2021). Food waste index report 2021. Available at: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-  
37. UNEP. (2024). Think eat save. Tracking progress to halve global food waste. Food Waste Index Report  
Page 10452  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
38. Wan, L. (2018). Food waste-fighting app launched to tackle Japan’s six-million-tonne burden. Available  
at:  
39. Willige, A. (2023). ways tech can help reduce food waste. Available at:  
40. Wood, J. (2023). innovative solutions for fighting food waste. Available at:  
5
7
41. World Economic Forum. (2023). 4 ways to reduce food waste in South-east Asia. Available at:  
42. Zaini, S. F., Mohd Yatim, S. R., Dasiman, R., Abdullah, S., and Mohd Zainuddin, N. A. (2023). A  
systematic literature review on the technological approach of food waste disposal and its environmental  
impact in Asian Countries. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 18(8), 211-229.  
Page 10453