INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10570
www.rsisinternational.org
Impact of Sustainable Funding and Resource Management Strategies on
Quality Early and Primary Education in Nigeria
Muplang Samuel Milaham
Customer Care Representative, MTN Nigeria
A paper presented for Centre of Excellence Tetfund publication. October 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000859
Received: 12 June 2025; Accepted: 16 October 2025; Published: 27 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Ensuring quality early childhood and primary education requires sustainable funding and effective resource
management. However, many education systems face financial instability, inefficient resource allocation, and
policy inconsistencies that hinder the delivery of quality learning. Inadequate funding leads to overcrowded
classrooms, insufficient learning materials, low teacher motivation, and poor infrastructure, affecting student
performance and overall educational outcomes. This study explores sustainable funding mechanisms and best
practices in resource management to improve education quality. Using a survey-based approach, data were
collected from government officials, school administrators, teachers, parents, and donor agencies. The study
employed structured questionnaires to identify challenges in funding and resource management, as well as
proposed strategies for financial stability. Findings provided evidence-based recommendations for equitable
resource distribution, policy interventions, and financial accountability. This research is significant for
policymakers, school administrators, and stakeholders seeking to enhance the quality of education through
effective financial planning. It aims to contribute to a well-managed and financially sustainable education system
that guarantees access to quality learning opportunities for all children. By examining the relationship between
funding, resource management, and learning outcomes, this study also provided valuable insights for education
sector reforms and long-term sustainability.
INTRODUCTION
Quality early childhood and primary education are fundamentals in shaping a child's cognitive, social, and
emotional development. However, achieving and maintaining high educational standards require sustainable
funding and effective resource management (UNESCO, 2021). Many educational institutions, particularly in
developing countries, struggle with financial constraints that limit access to essential learning materials, qualified
teachers, and adequate infrastructure (World Bank, 2020). These challenges highlight the need for research on
sustainable funding mechanisms that can enhance equity and quality in education.
Early childhood and primary education needs comprise of physical, emotional, social and cognitive
development.
This study focuses on three key variables: sustainable funding, resource management, and quality education.
Sustainable funding refers to long-term financial strategies that ensure continuous investment in education
through government allocations, donor contributions, and community support (OECD, 2019). It involves reliable
financial planning that prevents budget deficits and ensures that schools receive consistent funding to meet
operational and developmental needs. Without sustainable funding, educational institutions often face
interruptions in essential services, leading to compromised learning outcomes and increased dropout rates.
Resource management involves the efficient allocation and utilization of financial, human, and material
resources to maximize educational outcomes (Ngware, 2018). Effective resource management ensures that
available funds are used appropriately to improve teacher salaries, school infrastructure, learning materials, and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10571
www.rsisinternational.org
student support services. Poor resource management can lead to wastage, inefficiencies, and misallocation of
funds, further widening the gap between well-funded and underfunded schools.
Quality education, in this context, is characterized by improved student performance, well-trained teachers,
sufficient learning materials, and a conducive learning environment (UNICEF, 2020). The availability of
sustainable funding and effective resource management directly influences education quality, as schools with
adequate financial resources and proper management are more likely to offer engaging curricula, modern
teaching methods, and well-maintained facilities that enhance learning experiences.
Despite global efforts to promote free and compulsory education, many schools still struggle with inadequate
financial resources. Inefficient budget allocation, corruption, and economic instability further exacerbate
disparities in education quality (Glewwe & Muralidharan, 2016). Without proper financial sustainability, schools
face challenges such as teacher shortages, outdated curricula, and poor infrastructure, ultimately affecting student
success (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2020).
Education funding is increasingly being influenced by both government and private sector investments.
Governments remain the primary source of education funding, allocating budgets to public schools and providing
subsidies to support education access (OECD, 2020). However, financial constraints often lead to funding gaps,
prompting private sector involvement. Private institutions, corporate sponsorships, and public-private
partnerships (PPPs) have become essential in supplementing government funding. While private sector
investment can enhance infrastructure and technology in schools, concerns arise regarding access and
affordability, particularly in low-income communities.
International donors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and development agencies play a crucial role in
funding education initiatives. Organizations such as the World Bank, UNICEF, and UNESCO provide grants,
scholarships, and infrastructural support to improve education quality, particularly in developing countries.
Donor support is essential for addressing emergencies, supporting marginalized groups, and promoting
educational reforms. However, dependency on donor funding raises sustainability concerns, as funding priorities
may shift based on global economic and political conditions (Altbach& de Wit, 2021).
Community involvement in education funding has gained traction as a means to ensure sustainability and
inclusivity. Local communities contribute through fundraising, school development levies, and volunteer
services. Parent-teacher associations (PTAs) and community-based organizations play a pivotal role in bridging
funding gaps by supporting school programs, infrastructure, and extracurricular activities. Engaging
communities in education funding fosters a sense of ownership, accountability, and long-term sustainability
(Bray, 2018). However, disparities in community resources can lead to unequal educational opportunities,
requiring balanced funding strategies.
This research aims to find out sustainable funding and education quality, identify challenges in resource
management, and propose strategic solutions for long-term financial stability in early childhood and primary
education. Findings from this study will provide policymakers and stakeholders with insights to enhance funding
strategies and optimize resource utilization for improved educational outcomes.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The foundation of any nation's educational system lies in early childhood and primary education, as these stages
play a crucial role in shaping children's cognitive, social, and emotional development. However, the quality of
education at these levels is heavily dependent on adequate and sustainable funding as well as efficient resource
management. In many developing and even developed nations, early childhood and primary education systems
often struggle with financial constraints, poor resource allocation, and inefficient management, leading to
overcrowded classrooms, inadequate learning materials, poorly trained teachers, and substandard infrastructure.
One of the major challenges facing early childhood and primary education is inconsistent and insufficient
funding from government and private sources. Many schools rely on government subventions, donor support, or
parental contributions, which may not be sustainable in the long run. In cases where funds are available,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10572
www.rsisinternational.org
mismanagement, corruption, and lack of proper accountability mechanisms often hinder the effective utilization
of these resources, preventing schools from achieving their educational goals. Additionally, the lack of long-
term financial planning and reliance on unpredictable funding sources often result in interruptions in school
operations, delays in teacher salaries, and a decline in the quality of education. Another critical issue is inefficient
resource management. In many schools, available resources including finances, infrastructure, instructional
materials, and human capital are not optimally allocated or utilized, leading to wastage and underperformance.
Poor planning and lack of transparency in budgeting contribute to inequitable distribution of educational
resources, with some schools receiving better funding and facilities while others remain underfunded. Moreover,
rapid population growth and increasing school enrollments further strain the already limited resources, making
it difficult for schools to maintain small class sizes, provide individualized learning, and ensure teacher
effectiveness. Failure to address these financial and resource management challenges has long-term
consequences on learning outcomes, as students in poorly funded schools often experience lower academic
achievement, higher dropout rates, and limited access to quality education. Additionally, teachers working in
underfunded environments may lack motivation, professional development opportunities, and necessary
teaching aids, further affecting the quality of instruction. Given the importance of sustainable funding and
effective resource management in achieving quality education, this study seeks to explore innovative and
practical solutions to ensure that early childhood and primary education systems receive consistent funding and
optimize available resources. The study will investigate various funding models, resource allocation strategies,
and policy interventions that can enhance the sustainability of educational financing while ensuring efficient
utilization of resources to improve learning outcomes. By addressing these issues, this research aims to
contribute to the development of a financially stable and well-managed educational system that guarantees
quality early childhood and primary education for all children, regardless of their socioeconomic background.
Research Questions
1. What are the effects of sustainable funding on early childhood and primary school education?
2. What are the effects of quality resource management strategies on early childhood and primary school
education?
Research Aims
1. To find sustainability in funding early childhood and primary school education.
2. To find out the resource management strategies employed in early and primary schools’ education
Theoretical Framework
This study adopts the Human Capital Theory introduced by Gary Becker in 1964. The theory states that
investment in education, training, and skills development enhances human productivity, leading to economic
and social benefits. According to Becker (1964), education is a crucial form of capital that yields long-term
returns, both at the individual and societal levels. The principles of the Human Capital Theory emphasize the
importance of continuous investment in knowledge and skills to drive economic growth, reduce inequalities, and
improve overall well-being. This theory is relevant to this study as it underscores the need for sustainable funding
and efficient resource management in education, ensuring that children receive quality education that contributes
to national development and economic stability. By aligning financial strategies with human capital investment,
policymakers and educators can create a robust education system that produces well-equipped individuals ready
to contribute to society.
Research Design
This study adopted a survey research design, which is appropriate for gathering quantifiable data from a large
and diverse population. The survey design enabled the collection of structured, comparable responses that could
be analyzed statistically to draw inferences about sustainable funding and education quality in early childhood
and primary education. Structured questionnaires with closed-ended questions were developed as the main data
collection instrument. This choice ensured uniformity in responses and facilitated quantitative analysis. The
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10573
www.rsisinternational.org
research approach was underpinned by the positivist paradigm, which emphasizes objectivity, reliability, and
generalizability of results. Data analysis was carried out in two phases. First, descriptive statistics percentage,
mean scores, and frequency distributions were applied to present trends in funding adequacy, teacher salary
satisfaction, and availability of learning materials. Second, inferential statistics, specifically regression analysis,
were used to test hypotheses and determine the extent to which sustainable funding and resource management
predicted education quality. By combining descriptive and inferential analysis, the study ensured both clarity of
trends and depth of interpretation.
POPULATION AND SAMPLING
Population
The population for this study comprised 1,250 key stakeholders in early childhood and primary education in
Plateau and Nasarawa states. These stakeholders were considered critical, as their decisions and perspectives
directly shape the financing, management, and quality of education. Below is a table depicting the population
for the study.
Teachers
Parents
School administrators
Policy makers
Total Population
500
350
250
150
1250
Sampling
A stratified random sampling technique was employed to ensure that subgroups were adequately represented.
The strata were based on:
School type: public vs. private institutions
School location: urban vs. rural communities
Stakeholder role: teachers, administrators, parents, policymakers
From the total population, a sample size of 300 respondents was drawn using standard statistical sample
determination methods. The breakdown was as follows:
Parents
School administrators
Policy makers
80
70
50
This sampling approach enhanced representativeness, reduced bias, and increased the generalizability of findings
across various socio-economic and institutional settings.
Method of Data Collection
Data were collected using structured questionnaires distributed to the sampled respondents. The instrument
consisted of four sections:
1. Demographic Information (age, gender, role, school type, and location)
2. Adequacy of Funding (questions on school financing, government support, and alternative funding
sources)
3. Teacher Remuneration and Welfare (questions on salary satisfaction, allowances, and motivation)
4. Availability of Resources (questions on provision of textbooks, teaching aids, classrooms, and other
infrastructure)
The instrument was pre-tested in a pilot study to check for reliability and clarity. Cronbach’s Alpha yielded a
reliability coefficient of 0.81, indicating a high level of internal consistency.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10574
www.rsisinternational.org
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Descriptive Findings
Table 1: Adequacy of Funding
Response
Count
Percentage
YES
225
75%
NO
75
25%
Source: Field Survey, 2025
The results show that a majority of respondents (75%) perceive funding as adequate, though 25% consider it
inadequate. This indicates a funding gap in certain schools, especially in rural and low-income settings.
Table 2: Teacher Salary Satisfaction
Response
Count
Percentage
YES
174
58%
NO
126
42%
Source: Field Survey, 2025
Teacher salary satisfaction was moderate, with 58% satisfied and 42% dissatisfied. The dissatisfaction rate
underscores concern about teacher welfare, which can influence teacher retention and classroom performance.
Table 3: Availability of Learning Materials
Response
Count
Percentage
YES
246
82%
NO
54
18%
Source: Field Survey, 2025
A large majority (82%) reported sufficient learning materials, while 18% disagreed. This suggests that although
learning materials are fairly available, disparities exist across schools, particularly between urban and rural
institutions.
Inferential Findings (Regression Analysis)
Regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between sustainable funding indicators
(adequacy of funding, teacher salary satisfaction, and availability of learning materials) and education quality.
The results are summarized below:
Adequacy of funding significantly predicted education quality (β = 0.62, R² = 0.41, p < 0.05).
Availability of learning materials also showed a strong positive effect (β = 0.54, R² = 0.37, p < 0.05).
Teacher salary satisfaction had a weaker but still significant effect (β = 0.29, p < 0.05).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10575
www.rsisinternational.org
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study highlight the pivotal role of sustainable funding in shaping the quality of early
childhood and primary education in Plateau and Nasarawa States, Nigeria. The descriptive and inferential
analyses demonstrate that funding adequacy, availability of learning materials, and teacher salary satisfaction all
contribute significantly to education quality, though with varying degrees of influence. Consistent with previous
studies (Musah, 2024 Hassan, Groot, & Volante 2025), the results confirm that adequate financial investment in
schools enhances the provision of teaching and learning resources, which in turn supports better student
performance. The regression results showed that funding adequacy and learning material availability had the
strongest predictive power, underscoring the argument that financial resources remain the foundation upon which
educational outcomes are built. This aligns with Ugwuibe and Anyadike’s (2024) observation that without
sustainable financing, achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) of inclusive and equitable quality
education remains elusive. Teacher salary satisfaction, though statistically significant, exerted a comparatively
weaker influence on education quality. This finding partly reflects the structural issues in Nigeria’s wage system
for educators, where salary levels often fail to keep pace with inflation and rising living costs (Amadi, 2023).
While salary satisfaction alone may not guarantee improved outcomes, inadequate remuneration undermines
teacher motivation, retention, and instructional commitment (Bello & Musa, 2023). Thus, addressing teacher
welfare remains a critical element of education reform.
The study further reveals disparities between urban and rural schools, particularly in terms of learning material
provision. Respondents from rural communities reported greater funding inadequacies and limited access to
instructional resources, echoing similar patterns documented in Sub-Saharan Africa (Droubi, Mertens, &
Williams, 2023). This rural-urban divide suggests that education financing policies in Nigeria must prioritize
equity, ensuring that resource allocation bridges systemic gaps rather than reinforcing them. Another important
implication is the need for diversified funding strategies. Sole reliance on government allocations, which are
frequently delayed or insufficient, is unsustainable. Community participation, public-private partnerships, and
innovative financing mechanisms such as education levies or philanthropic contributions could provide
supplementary resources. As Koh (2023) suggests, sustaining educational quality requires broad-based support
that extends beyond the state.
Finally, the findings emphasize the necessity of transparent financial management and accountability. Funding
without effective utilization risks waste, corruption, and mismanagement. Policies must therefore incorporate
monitoring frameworks that track expenditure and ensure resources directly enhance teaching and learning.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
While this study offers valuable insights, it is important to recognize its limitations:
Geographic scope: The research was limited to Plateau and Nasarawa States. Findings may not fully represent
the situation in other Nigerian states. Self-reported data: The reliance on questionnaires may introduce
subjectivity or bias, as responses reflect personal perceptions rather than direct observation. Exclusion of
students: The study focused on administrators, teachers, parents, and policymakers, but did not include student
voices. Their perspectives could provide additional insights into the impact of funding on learning experiences.
Cross-sectional design: Data were collected at a single point in time, which limits the ability to establish causal
relationships. Longitudinal studies could provide deeper understanding of trends over time.
Future research could address these limitations by expanding to additional states, using mixed methods
(interviews and classroom observations), and including student perspectives.
CONCLUSION
Overall, this study provides empirical evidence that sustainable funding is not only a matter of increasing
financial inputs but also of ensuring that resources are equitably distributed, efficiently managed, and
strategically aligned with the needs of teachers and learners. The discussion highlights that strengthening
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 10576
www.rsisinternational.org
Nigeria’s education system requires a holistic approach one that addresses financing adequacy, teacher welfare,
resource distribution, and accountability simultaneously.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- Education funding should be increased and distributed equitably to reduce disparities between urban and rural
schools.
- Teacher welfare should be improved through fair salaries, benefits, and professional development to enhance
motivation and retention.
-Transparent financial management and diversified funding sources should be adopted to ensure sustainability
and accountability in education.
REFERENCES
1. Adesua, V. O., & Awonegan, F. I. (2024). Higher education financing in Nigeria and the impact of the
post-COVID-19 pandemic. Current Research in Education, 9(2), 87102.
2. Amadi, U. V. (2023). The impact of funding on educational development in Nigeria. Journal of
Education in Developing Areas, 31(3), 4561.
3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to
education. University of Chicago Press.
4. Bello, A., & Musa, F. (2023). Resource allocation efficiency in Nigerian primary schools. Journal of
Education Finance and Policy, 18(2), 145162.
5. Droubi, S., Mertens, F., & Williams, J. (2023). Transforming education for the just transition. International
Journal of Educational Development, 99, 102721.
6. Glewwe, P., &Muralidharan, K. (2016). Improving education outcomes in developing countries: Evidence,
knowledge gaps, and policy implications. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5, 653-743.
7. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). The economic impacts of learning losses. OECD.
8. Hassan, E., Groot, W., &Volante, L. (2025). The relationship between education funding and student
performance in Unity Schools in Nigeria. Education Sciences, 15(1), 86.
9. Koh, G. A. (2023). Sustaining school improvement initiatives: advice from educational leaders. Journal
of Educational Change, 24(3), 233251.
10. Musah, A. (2024). Public education financing and educational quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cogent
Social Sciences, 10(1), 2295166.
11. Ngware, M. (2018). Effective resource utilization in education: Insights for policy and practice. African
Population and Health Research Center.
12. OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development.
13. Ogwuche, A. O. (2025). Exploring the effects of funding on educational outcomes in Nigeria, Canada, and
Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 2235.
14. Ugwuibe, C. O., & Anyadike, N. O. (2024). Evaluation of federal government funding of public university
education for SDG 4. Journal of Business and Econometrics Studies, 5(2), 100112.
15. UNESCO. (2021). The role of education in fostering sustainable development. United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
16. UNICEF. (2020). Education strategy 2019-2030: Every child learns. United Nations International
Children's Emergency Fund.
17. World Bank. (2020). Financing education: Opportunities for global action. World Bank Group.