Recommendations for Replication and Scaling
For scalability, NIWC’s practices should prioritize adaptable modules such as digital-ethics training and
reflective wellness journals rather than expensive infrastructure. Policymakers should integrate digital-wellbeing
competencies into accreditation and counsellor-training standards [19]. Sustainability requires cross-sector
collaborations with health agencies, EdTech firms, and community organizations to maintain operational and
ethical continuity [20].
CONCLUSION
The Neuro-Immersive Wellness Centre (NIWC) represents a bold reimagining of what student wellbeing can
look like in the 21st century.
By integrating neuroscience, immersive technology, AI analytics, and social enterprise, NIWC transcends
conventional mental health support and offers a sustainable, replicable model for educational institutions across
the region.
Its framework responds to contemporary needs: personalization, engagement, scalability, and purpose. As mental
health continues to emerge as a global educational priority, models like NIWC will be instrumental in preparing
institutions, educators, and students to thrive in an uncertain but opportunity-filled future.
DATA AVAILABILITY
In alignment with the project’s ethics approval, data is available on request by contacting the first author.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the University Pendidikan Sultan Idris Research Ethics
Committee. All procedures were conducted in accordance with established ethical standards for research
involving human participants.
The author(s) would like to express their sincere gratitude to all individuals and institutions who contributed
indirectly to this research. This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all.
Geneva, Switzerland: Author. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338
2. UNESCO. (2023). Futures of education: Learning to become in a digital world. Paris: Author.
3. Ma, Z., & Clark, A. (2022). Digital-native students’ expectations for online wellbeing services.
Computers & Education, 186, 104528.
4. Thibault, R. T., Lifshitz, M., Birbaumer, N., & Raz, A. (2018). Neurofeedback with fMRI: A critical
systematic review. NeuroImage, 172, 786–807.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.071
5. Coch, D., & Moses, L. J. (2023). Neuroscience and education: Linking brain and behaviour.
Educational Psychologist, 58(2), 91–107.
6. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., & Mantovani, F.(2021). Neuroscience of virtual reality: From virtual
exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(1), 29–
36. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29183.gri
7. Maples-Keller, J. L., Yasinski, C., Manjin, N., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). The use of virtual reality
technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of
Psychiatry, 25(3), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138
8. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being.
New York: Free Press.
9. Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2020). A multidimensional approach to