INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Heat Sink Geometry Comparison for Energy Efficiency in Compact  
Electronics: Implications for Electricity Savings and CO₂ Emission  
Reduction  
Zairul Anuar bin Zamri., Muhammad Zulfattah bin Zakaria., Abdul Rafeq bin Saleman., Norain binti  
Idris  
Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka  
Received: 22 November 2025; Accepted: 29 November 2025; Published: 03 December 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The rising global demand for digital technology has increased electricity consumption across all levels of  
electronic usage, from household devices to large-scale data centers. Improving the energy efficiency of compact  
electronics is therefore essential for reducing power demand and lowering the CO₂ emissions associated with  
electricity generation. This study compares two copper heat sink geometries—fin-type and pin-type—to evaluate  
their influence on thermal management and energy-use effectiveness in a miniature Application-Specific  
Integrated Circuit (ASIC) device exposed to laminar airflow for heat dissipation. Laminar airflow at a speed of  
0.5ꢀm/s was selected to simulate typical compact electronic ventilation. Using infrared thermography and  
onboard sensing, the study examines how geometric variations affect heat dissipation, operational temperature,  
and computational efficiency under a constant 100ꢀW load. Results show that the 9-pin heat sink significantly  
reduces MOSFET temperature and increases computational output compared to both the 3-fin design and  
baseline conditions without a heat sink. These improvements translate into lower thermal losses, enabling the  
device to operate more efficiently with reduced electrical strain. By demonstrating that simple, low-cost  
geometric enhancements can meaningfully decrease heat accumulation and improve energy efficiency, this  
research highlights a practical pathway for reducing electricity consumption and the associated CO₂ emissions  
generated from fossil-fuel-based power systems. Moreover, the design insights are supported by recent advances  
in pin-fin design and optimization, reinforcing their relevance for sustainable electronics.  
INTRODUCTION  
The rising global demand for digital technology has increased electricity consumption across all levels of  
electronic usage, from household devices to large-scale data centers, making energy efficiency in electronics a  
key lever for reducing power demand and associated CO₂ emissions. Recent assessments show that data-center  
electricity demand has grown and contributes materially to global electricity use, while uncertainty in estimates  
underscores the need for device-level efficiency improvements (Mytton & Ashtine, 2022; Khosravi et al., 2024).  
Improving thermal management in compact electronics reduces electrical losses and auxiliary cooling  
requirements, directly lowering energy consumption and carbon intensity of operation (Zhang et al., 2022;  
Noussan et al., 2024). Heat‑sink geometry—particularly pin‑fin versus plate‑fin structures—strongly influences  
convective surface area, boundary‑layer disruption, and heat‑transfer efficiency under forced laminar flow, with  
recent studies reporting consistent performance advantages for optimized pin‑fin arrays (Rahman et al., 2024;  
Yang et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2024; Zohora et al., 2024; Linke et al., 2024; Nawaz et al., 2022). This study  
therefore evaluates two copper heat‑sink geometries (3‑fin and 9‑pin) under laminar airflow (0.5 m/s) to quantify  
differences in MOSFET temperature, computational efficiency, and the implied electricity‑use and  
CO₂‑reduction benefits when such device‑level improvements are scaled.  
METHODOLOGY  
Two copper heat sink geometries—a 3-fin structure and a 9-pin structure—were fabricated from a 6 mm × 6 mm  
copper bar using EDM wire cutting. Each heat sink maintained a consistent 36 mm² contact area with the  
Page 1776  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
MOSFET surface to ensure fair comparison. The objective was to evaluate how geometric design influences heat  
removal efficiency and the resulting impact on device energy performance.  
(a)  
(c)  
y
y
x
1.3mm x 1.3mm x 9 pins  
x
1.3 mm x 6mm x 3 fins  
(b)  
(d)  
z
z
x
x
1.3mm  
1.3mm  
Figure 1: Front view of the 3-fins heat sink (a), top view of the 3-fins heat sink (b), front view of the 9-pins heat  
sink (c), and top view of the 9-pins heat sink (d)  
Experimental Parameters  
Device: Computer with application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). It comprises of four distributed  
MOSFETs (processors) as the heat source.  
Electrical Load: Constant 100 W to simulate real operational demand.  
Airflow: Laminar flow at 0.5 m/s, representing typical compact electronic ventilation.  
Measurements:  
o
o
o
MOSFET temperature  
Heat sink temperature  
Computational efficiency (hashrate, MH/s)  
The setup is as illustrated in the Figure 2 below.  
Page 1777  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Figure 2: Setup of Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC)  
Energy-Related Analysis  
Temperature reductions were used to estimate energy waste reduction, as cooler components require less  
electrical compensation.  
Hashrate improvements were interpreted as enhanced energy-use efficiency, meaning more useful  
computation per watt.  
Findings were connected to potential electricity savings and CO₂ emission reductions when applied to  
large-scale deployments.  
RESULTS  
Thermal Performance  
The 9-pin heat sink lowered MOSFET temperature to 79.1°C, while the 3-fin heat sink reached 87.8°C, and the  
baseline (no heat sink) peaked at 120°C. These results show that geometric enhancements significantly improved  
heat extraction. The pin geometry provided more convective surface area, allowing faster heat dissipation under  
laminar airflow.  
Computational Efficiency and Energy Implications  
Higher temperatures are associated with electrical losses and performance degradation. The hashrate  
measurements reflect this:  
No heat sink: 202 MH/s  
3-fin: 207 MH/s  
9-pin: 210 MH/s  
This demonstrates that improved heat dissipation enables the device to operate with less internal electrical  
resistance, meaning more computation per watt of power input. Such improvements contribute directly to  
electricity savings.  
Environmental Impact Evaluation  
Efficient heat dissipation reduces electricity consumption in two ways:  
Page 1778  
 
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
1. Lower electrical losses in overheated components  
2. Reduced need for external cooling systems  
Assuming large-scale deployment in consumer electronics or computational devices, even small temperature  
reductions could yield significant reductions in CO₂ emissions. For 9-pin design with 3.81% higher efficiency  
than the standard, the carbon footprint is significantly lower depending on the fuel used to generate electricity.  
For a country like Germany that uses lignite, the carbon footprint is the highest at 1.1 kg CO₂/kWh (Table 1). A  
3.81% less electricity consumption is generous and lowers the environmental impact significantly.  
Table 1: Fuel type and its CO₂ release per kWh electricity generation  
Fuel Type  
CO₂ released per kWh (kg Total CO₂ released per GWh (t  
CO₂/kWh)  
CO₂/GWh)  
Coal (bituminous/sub-bituminous)  
Lignite  
0.820  
820  
1.100  
1100  
710  
Kerosene (power generation)  
Diesel (fuel oil No. 2 / No. 6)  
Natural gas (combined cycle)  
0.710  
0.740  
740  
0.490  
490  
DISCUSSION  
The results show that even simple geometric changes in heat sink design can meaningfully improve thermal  
performance and energy efficiency. By keeping electronic components cooler, less power is wasted overcoming  
thermal resistance, and devices can perform more work using the same electricity input.  
This has broad implications for sustainability:  
Cooler devices require less auxiliary cooling, reducing electricity consumption.  
Lower energy requirements lead to reduced CO₂ emissions, especially in regions where electricity is  
lignite, coal or gas-powered.  
Enhanced device efficiency prolongs hardware lifespan, reducing electronic waste.  
At scale - such as in data centers, mining rigs, or edge computing, optimized cooling solutions can  
contribute to national and global energy-saving strategies.  
CONCLUSION  
This study compared fin and pin heat sink geometries for improving heat dissipation, energy efficiency, and  
environmental performance in compact electronic devices. The 9-pin design demonstrated superior thermal  
conduction and convection under laminar airflow, reducing mosfet temperature and increasing computational  
efficiency.  
By lowering device temperature, electrical losses were minimized, resulting in improved energy-use efficiency.  
When such improvements are applied across large populations of electronic devices, the cumulative effect  
translates into meaningful electricity savings and CO₂ emission reductions.  
Page 1779  
 
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT  
Authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia and Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA)  
for their financial and non-financial supports.  
REFERENCES  
1. Mytton, D., & Ashtine, M. (2022). Sources of data centre energy estimates: A comprehensive review.  
Joule, 6(9), 2032–2056.  
2. Khosravi, A., et al. (2024). Review of energy efficiency and technological advances in data‑centre power  
systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.  
3. Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Prediction of overall energy consumption of data centers. Sensors, 22(10), 3704.  
4. Noussan, M., et al. (2024). Hourly electricity CO₂ intensity profiles. Energy.  
5. Rahman, M. A., et al. (2024). Advancing thermal management in electronics. RSC Advances.  
6. Yang, T., et al. (2024). Application of pin‑fins in enhancing heat transfer. Energies, 17(17), 4305.  
7. Qin, Z., et al. (2024). Heat transfer with micro pin fins. Micromachines, 15(9), 1120.  
8. Zohora, F.-T., et al. (2024). Perforated pin‑fin heat sinks. Heliyon, 11(1), e41496.  
9. Linke, M., et al. (2024). Pin and perforated heatsink cooling. Journal of Thermal Analysis and  
Calorimetry, 149, 6517–6529.  
Page 1780