
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
for engaging audiences and transmitting cultural knowledge effectively.
Based on the findings, several practical and policy-oriented recommendations are proposed to strengthen the
preservation and revitalization of ethnic textile heritage in digital contexts. First, guidelines for digital heritage
preservation should be established at institutional and governmental levels to ensure that digital representations
of ethnic crafts maintain authenticity, respect intellectual property, and involve community participation
throughout the design and dissemination process. Second, regional cultural tourism strategies can benefit from
integrating virtual exhibitions as complementary tools for promoting ethnic culture and generating sustainable
economic value. Digital platforms can attract both domestic and international audiences, supporting local
artisans while contributing to regional cultural branding and creative economy development.
Third, cross-sector collaboration among designers, technologists, and cultural heritage experts should be
encouraged to co-create interactive and educational digital exhibitions. Such collaborations can bridge the gap
between cultural authenticity and technological innovation, ensuring that digital interventions reflect both
creative excellence and ethical responsibility. Fourth, capacity-building programs are essential to combine
traditional apprenticeship with digital literacy training, enabling artisans to adapt to new technologies without
compromising craftsmanship standards. This dual training approach enhances artisans’ agency and participation
in digital projects. Finally, sustainable funding mechanisms should be developed to support long-term digital
preservation efforts. Governments, cultural foundations, and private enterprises could jointly establish financial
models that provide consistent support for digital heritage initiatives, ensuring the economic sustainability of
artisan communities and the continued vitality of intangible cultural heritage.
This study also has certain limitations. The sample size was relatively small and focused primarily on
stakeholders within Guangxi, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the research
relied on qualitative interviews, which, while providing rich insights, may be influenced by participants’
subjective perspectives and self-reporting biases. The study also did not directly evaluate audience experiences
with digital exhibitions, leaving the impact on broader public engagement as an area for further exploration.
Future research could expand the sample to include national and international stakeholders involved in ethnic
textile preservation and digital heritage initiatives. Quantitative or mixed-method approaches could be employed
to assess the effectiveness of virtual exhibitions in increasing cultural knowledge, appreciation, and engagement
among different audiences. Longitudinal studies could also investigate how digital platforms influence the
sustainability of traditional practices over time. Furthermore, comparative studies across different ethnic textile
traditions may provide insights into the generalizability of participatory and digital strategies for intangible
cultural heritage preservation.
REFERENCES
1. Beale, G., Smith, N., Wilkins, T., Schofield, G., Hook, J., & Masinton, A. (2022). Digital Creativity and
the Regional Museum: Experimental collaboration at the convergence of immersive media and exhibition
design. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(4), 1-23.
2. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K.
(2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing,
25(8), 652-661.
3. Chai, Z., & Sirisuk, M. (2023). Brocade of Tujia in Western Hunan, China: Material Culture and The
Invention of Tradition In the Process of Minority Sustainable Development Mahasarakham University.
4. Chuprina, N., Remenieva, T., Frolov, I., & Tereshchenko, O. (2021). Design of the contemporary
garments on the basis of the transformation of stylistic and artistic-compositional characteristics of
traditional decorative art. Art and design, 3(4), 30-44.
5. Dang, Q., Luo, Z., Ouyang, C., Wang, L., & Xie, M. (2021). Intangible cultural heritage in China: A
visual analysis of research hotspots, frontiers, and trends using CiteSpace. Sustainability, 13(17), 9865.
6. Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research.
European journal of information systems, 21(2), 135-146.
7. Hou, Y., Kenderdine, S., Picca, D., Egloff, M., & Adamou, A. (2022). Digitizing intangible cultural
heritage embodied: State of the art. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 15(3), 1-20.
8. Kamariotou, V., Kamariotou, M., & Kitsios, F. (2021). Strategic planning for virtual exhibitions and