INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2213
www.rsisinternational.org
Contribution of Cocoa Farming to Household’s Income and
Livelihood Improvement in Kyela District Council, Mbeya Region,
Tanzania
Lucas Odilo Komba, Prof. Zebedayo S. Mvena, Dr. Sosthenes Ruheza
Department of Community Development, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Iringa, P.O
Box 200, Iringa, Tanzania.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000182
Received: 10 October 2025; Accepted: 16 October 2025; Published: 07 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the contribution of cocoa farming to household income and livelihood improvement in
Kyela District Council (KDC), Mbeya Region, Tanzania. A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed
using a mixed-methods approach. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires, supplemented by
interviews with key informants. Quantitative data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science
(SPSS) Version 20, while qualitative data were analyzed by using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that cocoa
farming contributes significantly to household income. Whereas, more than 70% of households derive over half
of their total earnings from cocoa, with 26.3% reporting cocoa provides more than 75% of their income.
Households also reported increases in cocoa-related income over the past three years, which facilitated
investments in assets, payment of school fees, and other essential non-food expenses. The study concludes that
cocoa farming plays a transformative role in sustaining rural livelihoods in KDC, though vulnerabilities remain
due to seasonal price fluctuations. It is recommended that farmer cooperatives be strengthened, financial literacy
promoted, and market access improved to enhance the sustainability of cocoa-based incomes.
Keywords: Cocoa farming, household income, rural livelihoods, Kyela District, Tanzania
INTRODUCTION
Cocoa farming is one of the most important cash crop enterprises supporting rural livelihoods in tropical regions.
Globally, it provides income to over 50 million people, primarily smallholder farmers in Africa, Latin America,
and Asia (FAO, 2021). In sub-Saharan Africa, cocoa farming plays a particularly vital role, accounting for a
substantial share of household income and foreign exchange earnings. Studies have shown that in Ghana, Côte
d’Ivoire, and Nigeria, cocoa contributes between 60% and 80% of household income (Asare et al., 2018;
Ntiamoah et al., 2022).
Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that cocoa farming significantly improves household economic
well-being. In Ghana, cocoa earnings enable farmers to meet essential expenses such as food, education, and
healthcare, while also supporting asset accumulation and savings (Ruf & Bini, 2020; Osei et al., 2021). Similarly,
in Nigeria, Adeyemi (2021) found that cocoa farming accounted for nearly 70% of total household income,
helping families to invest in housing and small businesses despite challenges such as price volatility and climate
shocks.
In East Africa, research on cocoa farming remains relatively limited compared to West Africa. However, studies
in Tanzania indicate that cocoa is becoming an increasingly important source of cash income, particularly in
Kyela and Bukoba districts, where favorable climatic conditions encourage smallholder participation (Mmbando
& Baiyegunhi, 2016; Kweka & Msangya, 2018). Cocoa farming provides a reliable source of seasonal income
that supports household consumption and improves rural living standards. According to Kapinga et al. (2020),
cocoa farmers in southern Tanzania use their earnings to finance household needs, including food, school fees,
and healthcare, which collectively enhance overall welfare.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2214
www.rsisinternational.org
Beyond direct income, cocoa farming has multiplier effects on local economies through employment creation,
rural trade, and cooperative development. Cocoa marketing cooperatives, for example, play a crucial role in
improving farmers bargaining power and ensuring fair prices (Antwi-Agyei et al., 2021). In addition, cocoa
income often supports investment in productive assets, such as livestock and farm equipment, which further
increase income-generating potential (Abekoe & Osei, 2021).
However, dependence on cocoa as a single cash crop also exposes households to risks arising from price
fluctuations, pests, and changing climate patterns. Studies in Ghana and Nigeria have shown that income
instability due to cocoa price drops can negatively affect welfare and household resilience (Dzanku, 2019; Anim-
Kwapong & Frimpong, 2019). These findings highlight the importance of diversification, improved market
access, and sustainable production practices to stabilize cocoa-based incomes.
In Tanzania, evidence from Kyela District suggests that cocoa farming contributes significantly to household
income and is becoming a cornerstone of the rural economy. Yet, more empirical research is needed to quantify
its exact economic contribution and to inform policies aimed at maximizing its benefits for smallholder farmers.
Despite the recognized importance of cocoa farming in Kyela District, there is limited empirical evidence
quantifying its direct contribution to household income and economic well-being. Many households remain
vulnerable to income fluctuations due to reliance on a single cash crop, and little is known about how cocoa
earnings translate into asset accumulation and overall welfare. This lack of precise information makes it difficult
for policymakers and development actors to design interventions that maximize the economic benefits of cocoa
farming for smallholder households.
Significance of the Study
This study is significant in three major dimensions: academic, practical, and policy.
Academically, the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on agricultural livelihoods and rural
development in Tanzania. It provides empirical evidence on how cocoa farming influences household income
and overall welfare in KDC. By combining quantitative and qualitative analyses, the study deepens the
understanding of how smallholder cocoa production supports education, asset accumulation, and essential
household expenditures, thereby expanding theoretical discussions on the relationship between cash crops and
rural livelihoods.
Practically, the findings offer valuable insights to cocoa farmers and local communities regarding the economic
potential and sustainability of cocoa production. The study reveals how cocoa farming serves as a critical source
of income while identifying persistent challenges such as seasonal price fluctuations. These insights can guide
farmers, cooperatives, and development partners in making informed decisions related to production, income
diversification, and financial management. Strengthening farmer organizations and promoting financial literacy
emerge as key strategies for enhancing resilience and improving household well-being.
From a policy perspective, the study provides evidence-based recommendations for government institutions and
development agencies aiming to strengthen the cocoa sector. Improving market access, stabilizing prices, and
enhancing access to credit are essential measures to sustain cocoa-based livelihoods. The study thus supports
Tanzania’s broader development objectives, particularly those targeting poverty reduction, inclusive economic
growth, and rural transformation through agricultural modernization.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Perspective: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
This study is guided by Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory (Maslow, 1943), which explains human motivation
based on a hierarchy of five levels of needs: physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization.
According to the theory, individuals are motivated to satisfy basic needs first—such as food, shelter, and health
before progressing to higher-order needs like education, self-esteem, and personal growth. Income is therefore
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2215
www.rsisinternational.org
viewed as a key enabler that allows individuals and households to meet these needs systematically (Jerome,
2018).
In the context of rural livelihoods, income derived from cocoa farming plays a central role in fulfilling these
hierarchical needs. At the physiological level, cocoa earnings enable households to purchase food, pay for water,
and meet other daily consumption needs, thus securing their basic survival. At the safety level, income from
cocoa supports housing improvements, access to healthcare, and savings for emergencies, which reduce
vulnerability to shocks.
At the social and esteem levels, cocoa income contributes to education, social participation, and community
recognition, as farmers use their earnings to educate children and engage in social and cooperative activities.
Finally, at the self-actualization level, stable and sufficient income from cocoa farming allows households to
invest in long-term development goals, such as expanding farms, starting small businesses, or acquiring assets
that enhance economic independence and personal fulfillment (Omari et al., 2021).
Applying Maslow’s framework to this study provides a theoretical basis for understanding how cocoa income
supports multidimensional aspects of household welfare. The theory suggests that as cocoa farmers earnings
increase, they are better positioned to progress from meeting basic survival needs to achieving higher levels of
socio-economic well-being. Thus, cocoa farming not only contributes to material income but also facilitates
upward movement within the hierarchy of needs by empowering households economically and socially.
This theoretical perspective is relevant to the study because it highlights the interrelationship between income
generation and human welfare. In KDC, where cocoa serves as a major source of cash income, Maslow’s theory
helps explain how improved cocoa earnings translate into better living conditions, enhanced education, and
greater self-sufficiency among farming households.
Empirical Literature Review
Contribution of Cocoa Farming to HouseholdsIncome and Livelihood Improvement
Cocoa farming has long been recognized as a major source of household income and a foundation for rural
livelihoods across Africa. According to Osei-Gyabaah et al. (2023), cocoa contributes between 60% and 90% of
rural farmers household income, enabling families to meet essential needs such as food, education, healthcare,
and housing. This highlights the critical role of cocoa in sustaining household welfare and reducing rural poverty.
Empirical evidence from West Africa consistently demonstrates that cocoa farming is not only a profitable cash
crop but also a stabilizing economic activity that provides regular income compared to seasonal food crops. For
example, Adeyemi (2021) in Nigeria found that cocoa farming accounted for nearly 70% of household income
among smallholder farmers. Despite challenges such as market price fluctuations and climate variability, cocoa
farmers experienced relatively stable cash flow, allowing them to invest in long-term goals such as children’s
education, home improvement, and business expansion. These findings suggest that cocoa income enhances
financial security and provides a buffer against income shocks in rural economies.
Similarly, Coulibaly and Kouassi (2020) in Côte d’Ivoire observed that households engaged in cocoa farming
spent about 40% more on education and healthcare than those dependent solely on subsistence farming. This
indicates that cocoa income not only improves purchasing power but also leads to broader welfare improvements,
particularly in human capital development. However, their study also noted disparities in income levels
depending on farm size, access to farmer cooperatives, and proximity to markets, showing that institutional
support and infrastructure significantly influence how cocoa income translates into improved living standards.
Studies from Ghana reinforce these findings, showing that cocoa farming contributes substantially to household
income diversification and resilience. Asare et al. (2018) found that cocoa earnings enable farmers to accumulate
assets, access credit, and sustain non-farm enterprises, thereby enhancing long-term socio-economic stability. In
addition, Antwi-Agyei et al. (2021) emphasized that cocoa-based income provides liquidity that allows
households to cope with shocks such as droughts or health emergencies, underscoring its importance as both a
livelihood and a safety net.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2216
www.rsisinternational.org
In the Tanzanian context, cocoa farming—particularly in Kyela District—plays a similar role. Studies by
Mmbando and Baiyegunhi (2016) and Kapinga et al. (2020) reveal that cocoa provides an essential income
stream for smallholder farmers, supporting daily consumption and major household expenditures. Income from
cocoa sales helps families improve housing conditions, pay for education, and invest in agricultural inputs for
other crops. This demonstrates that cocoa farming not only enhances cash availability but also contributes to
multidimensional welfare outcomes for rural households.
Overall, the empirical literature indicates a strong positive relationship between cocoa farming and household
income. As farmers engage in cocoa production, they gain access to a more reliable and market-oriented income
source that promotes economic empowerment and improved living standards. However, realizing these benefits
fully depends on factors such as farm productivity, market access, cooperative participation, and supportive
policy frameworks.
Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework illustrates the relationship between cocoa farming and household income and
livelihood improvement. In this framework, cocoa farming is the independent variable, while the household
income level is the dependent variable. The framework assumes that the extent and performance of cocoa
farming directly influence the income status of households. This relationship is measured through three key
indicators: percentage of income from cocoa, cocoa sales revenue (TZS), and asset ownership.
Source: Researcher 2025
METHODOLOGY
Study Area
The study was conducted in KDC, located in Mbeya Region, Tanzania. KDC is the area leading for cocoa
production due to its fertile volcanic soils and favorable rainfall patterns (URT, 2021). Cocoa farming is practiced
mainly by smallholder households who rely on it as a primary cash crop to sustain their livelihoods.
Research Design
This study employed a descriptive cross-sectional design within a mixed-methods approach. The descriptive
design was appropriate because it enabled the researcher to capture detailed information on the contribution of
Independent variable
Dependent Variable
Contribution of Cocoa
Farming
Impact of Household
Income and Livelihood
improvement
o Improved
Households Welfare
Outcome
o Increased % Income
from cocoa
o Improved education
o Improved Asset
ownership
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2217
www.rsisinternational.org
cocoa farming to household income level without manipulating variables. The cross-sectional nature of the
design allowed data collection at a single point in time, while the mixed approach combined quantitative and
qualitative techniques to provide both breadth and depth of understanding (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).
Population, Sample Size, and Sampling Technique
Population of the study
The target population for this study comprised 302 smallholder cocoa farmers from Ipinda and Mababu wards
in KDC, Mbeya Region. From this population, a sample size of 172 farmers was drawn. The study covered four
villages, two from each ward namely Kafundo and Busale in Ipinda Ward, and Ngyeke and Kilombero in Mababu
Ward. The study specifically focused on household heads, as they are the key decision-makers responsible for
farming practices and household economic activities.
Also, the study included key informants such as cooperative officers, agricultural officers, and health workers,
who provided valuable insights into the broader context of cocoa farming in KDC. A total of seven key
informants were purposively selected based on their expert knowledge and relevance to the research topic. These
included two agricultural officers, one cooperative leader, and four health workers.
Sample Size
To determine the sample size for this study, the study used Yamane's (1967) formula. Yamane’s formula is
expressed as:
Where:
n= sample size
N= population size
e = margin of error (in this study, 5% or 0.05)
Substituting the value
n = 302/1+302(0.05)
2
(0.05)
2
= 0.0025
302 (0.0025)
= 0.775
1+0.775 = 1.775
302/1.775
= 172
Therefore, the study used a sample size of 172 cocoa farmers.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2218
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 1 Sample Distribution of Respondents
Ward
Villages
Cocoa Farmers
Ipinda
Kafundo
Busale
43
43
Mababu
Ngyeke
Kilombero
43
43
172
Source: Researcher 2025
Sampling techniques
This study employed a stratified random sampling technique to ensure proportional representation of the four
selected villages Kafundo and Busale in Ipinda Ward, and Ngyeke and Kilombero in Mababu Ward, all located
within the Ntebela administrative division of KDC. These villages were purposively identified due to their high
concentration of smallholder cocoa farmers. Stratification was applied to capture potential variations among the
villages while maintaining methodological rigor. This approach ensured that each household in the selected
wards had an equal chance of being included in the study.
Furthermore, purposive sampling was used to select seven key informants, consisting of two agricultural officers,
one cooperative leader, and four health workers. These individuals were chosen based on their expertise,
experience, and direct relevance to the research topic, particularly regarding the socio-economic aspects of cocoa
farming in the study area.
Data Collection Methods
Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires administered to cocoa-farming households. These
questionnaires captured information on household demographics, income sources, and the share of income
attributed to cocoa farming. In addition, key informant interviews were conducted with agricultural extension
officers and cooperative leaders to gain expert insights into cocoa production and marketing trends. Secondary
data were obtained from government reports, academic articles, and NGO publications (URT, 2021; Osei et al.,
2021).
Data Analysis
Quantitative data were coded and analyzed using SPSS (version 20). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies,
percentages, and means, were used to summarize household income sources and the contribution of cocoa
farming. Inferential analysis, particularly regression, was employed to explore the relationship between cocoa
farming and household income levels. Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed thematically, allowing for
triangulation of results between numerical evidence and contextual insights (Antwi-Agyei et al., 2021).
Research Approach
This study adopted a mixed research approach, combining both quantitative and qualitative methods. The
quantitative approach used structured questionnaires to generate numerical data on household income and
cocoa’s contribution, analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics in SPSS. The qualitative approach
employed interviews with key informants, including agricultural officers and cooperative leaders, to capture
contextual insights on cocoa farming and household livelihoods. Using a mixed approach allowed for
triangulation, enhanced validity, and provided a more comprehensive understanding of cocoa farmings
contribution to household income level in KDC (Creswell & Creswell, 2018; Antwi-Agyei et al., 2021).
Ethical Considerations
The study adhered to ethical research standards. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and
respondents were assured of confidentiality and anonymity. Participation was voluntary, and respondents were
allowed to withdraw at any stage of the study without consequences.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2219
www.rsisinternational.org
Data Collection Methods
Both primary and secondary data were used in this study. Primary data were collected through structured
questionnaires administered to cocoa-farming households, focusing on household income sources, share of
cocoa earnings, and related socio-economic aspects. In addition, key informant interviews were conducted with
agricultural officers and cooperative leaders to obtain expert insights. Secondary data were sourced from
government reports, academic publications, and NGO documents relevant to cocoa farming and household
welfare.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Contribution of Cocoa Farming to Household Income level in KDC
Main Sources of Household Income
The findings indicate that cocoa farming is a major source of household income in KDC. About 33.7% of
households reported cocoa as their main economic activity, followed by business (40.6%), crop farming (14.8%),
and employment (10.9%). Similar trends have been reported in Ghana, where cocoa production remains one of
the most significant livelihood activities for smallholder farmers, providing a reliable income base for rural
households (Asare et al., 2018).
Table 2: Main Sources of Household Income in KDC (n=172)
Source of Income
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Cocoa farming
59
33.7
Business
71
40.6
Other crop farming
23
14.8
Employment
19
10.9
Total
172
100.0
Source: Researcher, 2025
The results show that while business activities are common, cocoa remains the dominant agricultural livelihood
activity, accounting for one-third of households primary income sources.
Cocoa Farming to Total Household’s Income
In terms of income contribution, 45.1% of households reported that cocoa accounted for 51–75% of their total
income, while 26.3% indicated more than 75%. By contrast, only 14.3% reported 25–50%, and 14.3% less than
25%. This means that over 70% of households derive the majority of their income from cocoa. Also highlighted
inte d’Ivoire and Nigeria, where cocoa contributes over two-thirds of smallholder households’ earnings and
is essential for meeting daily consumption and long-term investment needs (Wessel & Quist-Wessel, 2015).
Table 3: Cocoa Farming to Total Household Income (n=172)
Cocoa Income Share of Total Income
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Less than 25%
25
14.3
25% – 50%
25
14.3
51% – 75%
76
45.1
More than 75%
46
26.3
Total
172
100.0
Source: Researcher, 2025
Trends over the past three years show positive growth, with 67.4% of households reporting a significant increase
in cocoa income, 26.9% noting a slight increase, and only 5.7% reporting no change. None reported a decline.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2220
www.rsisinternational.org
Seasonal Income Earned from Cocoa Farming
Seasonal income distribution revealed that 62.3% of households earned above TZS 2,000,000 per season, 11.4%
earned TZS 1,000,000–2,000,000, while 26.3% earned between TZS 500,000–1,000,000. Similar evidence from
recent studies in Tanzania and other cocoa-growing regions shows that cocoa income constitutes the main source
of seasonal earnings for smallholder households, helping to cover food, education, and healthcare costs, though
income fluctuations across seasons remain a challenge (Temba & Njau, 2025; World Cocoa Foundation, 2024).
Table 4: Seasonal Income Earned from Cocoa Farming (n = 172)
Income Category (TZS)
Frequency
Percentage (%)
500,000 – 1,000,000
44
26.3
1,000,000 – 2,000,000
20
11.4
Above 2,000,000
108
62.3
Total
172
100.0
Source: Researcher, 2025
These results indicate that cocoa farming contributes significantly to household income, with more than half of
the households achieving relatively high seasonal earnings. The variation in income levels reflects differences
in factors such as farm size, productivity, access to markets, and adoption of improved farming practices. The
dominance of households earning above TZS 2 million also suggests that cocoa plays a transformative role in
improving financial stability, enabling families to meet essential needs and invest in long-term welfare.
Household’s Asset Acquisition
The study shows that, 90.9% of households reported acquiring assets in the past year, with 76% financed directly
from cocoa earnings. Assets included livestock, household furniture, and mobile phones, all of which enhance
living standards and financial resilience. Comparable evidence from Ghana shows that cocoa farming promotes
households’ asset accumulation, which strengthens social and economic security (Abekoe & Osei, 2021).
Table 4. Household Asset Acquisition
Household’s Asset Acquisition Within the Last 12 Months
frequency
Percentage (%)
Yes
No
Total
156
90.9
16
172
9.1
100
Source: Researcher 2025
The findings confirm that high asset acquisition reflects positive household investment behavior and indicates
that cocoa farming contributes to both immediate income and long-term wealth accumulation.
Also, researcher engaged respondents in discussions about the contribution of cocoa farming to households’
income levels in Ipinda and Mababu wards, within KDC.
According to agricultural officer from Ipinda ward, cocoa farming has had a substantial impact on households’
income over the past five years. One Agricultural officer remarked,
Over the past five years, cocoa farming has significantly contributed to households’ income
levels in KDC. From our district agricultural reports, households’ income from cocoa has grown
by over 30%, especially due to improved post-harvest handling and access to better markets.
Farmers who previously earned below TZS 1 million per season are now reporting earnings
above TZS 2,000,000 (Interviewed Agricultural officer from Ipinda Ward, July 2025).
Another Agricultural officer from Mababu Ward explained,
“We have provided several training sessions focused on Good Agricultural Practices (GAP),
pruning, pest control, and fermentation techniques. Between 2020 and 2024, more than 1,200
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2221
www.rsisinternational.org
cocoa farmers were trained through programs supported by TARI and local NGOs. These
efforts have increased yield per acre from 400kg to about 700kg in some villages (Interviewed
Agricultural officer from Mababu Ward, July 2025).
A cooperative leader from Ipinda ward expressed strong confidence in the role that organized cocoa farming has
played in improving the incomes of smallholder farmers. He had the following to say that,
“Membership in the cooperative allows farmers to aggregate produce and negotiate higher
prices. Last year, our members earned TZS 18,620 to 32,171 per kg.This price difference, they
explained, directly translates into higher household earnings and greater financial stability.
Cooperative structures not only provide market leverage but also contribute to members’
capacity to manage income more effectively (Cooperative officer from Ipinda Ward, July 2025).
Health worker in KDC have also observed the positive effects of cocoa farming on household’s income,
especially in terms of health-related spending. One health worker from Ipinda Hospital noted that,
“We have noticed a clear improvement patient from cocoa-farming household’s now pay for
outpatient services and medications more reliably, and maternal clinic attendance rose by 18%
in the past two years.This trend demonstrates how increased income enables better access to
essential health services (Interviewed Health officer from Ipinda Hospital July 2025”).
Health worker in KDC have also observed the positive effects of cocoa farming on household’s income,
especially in terms of health-related spending. One health worker from Ipinda Hospital noted that,
“We have noticed a clear improvement patient from cocoa-farming household’s now pay for
outpatient services and medications more reliably, and maternal clinic attendance rose by 18%
in the past two years.This trend demonstrates how increased income enables better access to
essential health services (Interviewed Health officer from Ipinda Hospital July 2025”).
The responses affirm that cocoa income is not only boosting households’ livelihoods but also playing a crucial
role in enabling timely, consistent, and quality healthcare access for rural families.
CONCLUSIONS
The results show that cocoa farming is the main livelihood in Kyela, providing most household income,
supporting education, and improving living standards, making it vital to rural economic stability. Cocoa income
enables most households to afford three meals daily and diverse foods, though dependence on seasonal income
causes shortages during off-seasons, calling for savings and intercropping. It has also improved healthcare access
and preventive care, but low insurance coverage and poor infrastructure still expose farmers to financial risks
during illness.
RECOMMENDATIONS
cocoa farming is central to livelihoods in Kyela, improving income, food security, education, and healthcare
access. However, seasonal income fluctuations and limited insurance expose households to risks. Therefore, it
is recommended that farmers diversify income, adopt intercropping, strengthen savings, and expand health
coverage to enhance resilience and maintain stable living standards.
REFERENCES
1. Tanzania Ministry of Agriculture. (2020). Agricultural Sector Report. Dar es Salaam: Government of
Tanzania.
2. United Republic of Tanzania (URT). (2021). Agricultural Sector Annual Report 2020/2021. Ministry of
Agriculture, Dar es Salaam.
3. Wessel, M., & Quist-Wessel, P. M. F. (2015). Cocoa production in West Africa: A review and analysis.
NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 74–75, 1–7.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 2222
www.rsisinternational.org
4. Abekoe, M. K., & Osei, R. (2021). Cocoa income and asset accumulation among smallholder farmers in
Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 13(4), 203–213.
5. Adeyemi, M. (2021). Economic significance of cocoa farming on rural household income in Nigeria.
Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 9(2), 45–54.
6. Anim-Kwapong, G. J., & Frimpong, E. A. (2019). Effects of cocoa price fluctuations on rural welfare in
Ghana. African Journal of Economic Policy, 26(2), 75–92.
7. Antwi-Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2021). Climate adaptation through sustainable cocoa
production in Ghana. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 807–820.
8. Asare, R., Afari-Sefa, V., & Osei, M. (2018). Cocoa farming and rural livelihoods in Ghana.
Sustainability, 10(11), 1–15.
9. Dzanku, F. (2019). Livelihood effects of cash crop dependence among rural households in sub-Saharan
Africa. World Development, 115, 260–272.
10. FAO. (2021). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations.
11. Kapinga, F., Maleko, G., & Mpenda, Z. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in cocoa production among
smallholders in Tanzania. African Journal of Rural Development, 5(3), 77–89.
12. Kweka, O. L., & Msangya, S. (2018). Cocoa value chain analysis in southern highlands of Tanzania.
Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17(1), 25–34.
13. Mmbando, F., & Baiyegunhi, L. (2016). Adoption of improved agricultural technologies among
smallholder farmers in Tanzania: Evidence from cocoa production. Agrekon, 55(3), 233–252.
14. Ntiamoah, A., Boachie, M., & Antwi, E. (2022). The impact of cocoa income on household welfare in
Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. Development Studies Review, 40(4), 621–639.
15. Osei, R., Abekoe, M. K., & Tutu, R. A. (2021). Cocoa and household welfare in West Africa: Evidence
from Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Studies, 57(10), 1623–1638.
16. Ruf, F., & Bini, S. (2020). Cocoa farming and social change in West Africa. International Journal of
Agrarian Studies, 28(2), 155–173.
17. Jerome, N. (2018). Application of Maslows hierarchy of needs theory to human resource development.
Journal of Applied Psychology and Social Science, 4(1), 25–34.
18. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
19. Omari, K., Antwi-Agyei, P., & Darkwah, K. (2021). Livelihood motivation and well-being among
smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: Applying Maslow’s theory. International Journal of Social
and Development Studies, 8(2), 55–67.
20. Adeyemi, M. (2021). Economic significance of cocoa farming on rural household income in Nigeria.
Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 9(2), 45–54.
21. Antwi-Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2021). Climate adaptation through sustainable cocoa
production in Ghana. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 807–820.
22. Asare, R., Afari-Sefa, V., & Osei, M. (2018). Cocoa farming and rural livelihoods in Ghana.
Sustainability, 10(11), 1–15.
23. Coulibaly, K., & Kouassi, A. (2020). Cocoa farming and household welfare in Côte d’Ivoire: Insights
from smallholder farmers. African Development Review, 32(4), 612–625.
24. Kapinga, F., Maleko, G., & Mpenda, Z. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in cocoa production among
smallholders in Tanzania. African Journal of Rural Development, 5(3), 77–89.
25. Mmbando, F., & Baiyegunhi, L. (2016). Adoption of improved agricultural technologies among
smallholder farmers in Tanzania: Evidence from cocoa production. Agrekon, 55(3), 233–252.
26. Osei-Gyabaah, E., Danso-Abbeam, G., & Amoah, M. (2023). Cocoa farming and rural household income
in Ghana: Evidence from smallholder farmers. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8(1), 45
55.
27. Temba, P., & Njau, R. (2025). Factors influencing smallholder cocoa farmers participation in the
Warehouse Receipt Marketing System in Kyela District, Tanzania. ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393409958_Factors_Influencing_Smallholder_Cocoa_Farmer
s%27_Participation_in_the_Warehouse_Receipt_Marketing_Channel_in_Kyela_District_Tanzania
28. World Cocoa Foundation. (2024). Cocoa household income study: Climate-smart agriculture and income
stability. World Cocoa Foundation. https://worldcocoafoundation.org/storage/files/2024-cocoa-
household-income-study-approach-wur-english.pdf