INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2286
www.rsisinternational.org
The Use of Content Validity Index to Determine Content Validity of
Criteria for Sustainable Framework of TVET Teacher Education
Program at Master’s Level
Nor Hidayah Hamdan
*
., Zaliza Hanapi., Abdul Muqsith Ahmad., Siti Faizzatul Aqmal Mohamad
Mohsin., Azizul Qayyum Basri
Department of Engineering Technology, Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan
Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100182
Received: 19 November 2025; Accepted: 25 November 2025; Published: 04 December 2025
ABSTRACT
There has been report on the shortage of teachers all over the world, including TVET teachers. As main producer
of TVET teacher, TVET Teacher Education programs has to be revamp in order to ensure its sustainability and
durability in facing modern TVET challenges. This study aims to measure the content validity of the criteria for
sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s Level. A Content Validity Index (CVI) was used as
main analysis method to measure the content validity. Eight personnel from TVET and teacher education sector
in Malaysia public universities and industry were selected as experts in this study to evaluate on a 36 criteria of
sustainable TVET Teacher Education program questionnaire. Based on the analysis, all criteria show an excellent
I-CVI value of 1.000 indicating that all are relevant to the sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at
Master’s level with S-CVI analysis of 0.896 showing strong content validity. Overall, this finding has produced
a new set of criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level. The strong content
validity indicating the readiness of this set of criteria to be further validated by experts of different stakeholders
so that a firm validated sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level can be developed for
future endeavors.
Keywords: TVET, Teacher Education, CVI, Sustainability, Postgraduate
INTRODUCTION
In any countries, either developed or developing, recognized teachers as one of the professions that contributes
towards the quality of its citizen. Therefore, it can be said that teachers are the roots of nations’ talent quality
and carrying vast responsibility not only in academic aspect, but also in overall aspect including skills and
attitude. TVET teachers for instance are believed to have the responsibility in delivering industry-relevant
training, maintaining current knowledge of technologies, assessing student competencies, fostering soft skills,
and promoting lifelong learning. They also collaborate with industry partners to ensure curriculum alignment
with labour market needs [1]. These all to ensure the TVET future talent of the nations are fit with the ever-
changing industrial development in working sector. That is why, TVET teachers are now evolving from
knowledge transmitters to guides, focusing on innovative teaching methods, cultivating students' professional
skills, comprehensive qualities, and innovative spirits, while integrating interdisciplinary knowledge and
advanced tools like information technology to meet diverse learning needs [2].
As any other teacher education program, TVET teachers are produced specifically from TVET teacher programs
whereby the curriculum development of the program is developed according to the exclusive requirement of
TVET teachers. This includes the integration of both academic and skill training with direct involvement from
the industries itself. This is differed from other academic teacher training as the contribution and involvement of
industry player is compulsory for TVET Teacher Education program. Previous research had included strong
industry partnerships, and innovative teaching methods, all aimed at establishing sustainable, high-quality
training systems tailored to local contexts as part of core component in TVET teacher education program globally
together with well-structured pre- and in-service training, targeted pedagogical and domain-specific training [3].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2287
www.rsisinternational.org
Not only that, [4] also had concluded that professional development is essential for enhancing the competencies
and self-efficacy of novice TVET teachers.
Effective TVET teacher education programs should incorporate industry collaboration to align curricula with
current job market demands, emphasize innovation and technology, and focus on practical skills training to better
prepare graduates, ultimately addressing the shortage of skilled workers in the workforce [5]. This includes
emphasizing problem-based learning, blended learning, and work-integrated learning to create engaging
educational environments that foster essential competencies such as digital literacy, green skills, and
entrepreneurship [1]. Additionally, programs should prioritize the recruitment of industry-experienced
professionals as educators, ensuring they possess both practical expertise and pedagogical knowledge to
effectively prepare students for the evolving job market [6], [7]. Furthermore, addressing funding challenges is
crucial too, as adequate resources are necessary to upgrade training facilities and equipment, thereby aligning
educational offerings with modern industry standards [8]. By integrating these elements, TVET Teacher
Education programs can cultivate a skilled workforce capable of meeting current and future labour demands [9].
Therefore, this study was done in order to validate the criteria of sustainable TVET Teacher Education program
at Master’s level. By this, the right and important criteria can be identified thus can become tools in validating
the existing program to ensure its sustainability success and quality.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The key responsibilities and duties of a TVET teacher encompass a multifaceted approach to education that
integrates theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Primarily, TVET teachers are tasked with guiding students
to master essential scientific and technological concepts while fostering creativity and practical abilities
necessary for the workforce. They also play a crucial role in shaping students' worldviews and values, ensuring
a holistic educational experience [10]. Furthermore, TVET teachers must engage in continuous professional
development to adapt to evolving industry demands, which includes participating in both pre-service and in-
service training programs [11], [12]. This ongoing development is vital for enhancing their teaching effectiveness
and professional identity, ultimately contributing to the production of skilled graduates who meet labour market
needs [12], [13]. Additionally, TVET teachers are expected to act as facilitators, motivators, and mentors, thereby
promoting a supportive learning environment that encourages student independence and social skills [13].
Core components of TVET teacher education programs globally encompass several critical elements aimed at
enhancing the quality and relevance of training. These include well-structured service training, which integrates
pedagogical and content training tailored to industry needs [3]. A strong and dynamic curriculum is essential,
emphasizing competency-based approaches that align with real-world applications and industry standards,
thereby equipping learners with necessary skills [14]. Continuous professional development is vital, ensuring
that teachers remain updated with evolving labour market demands and pedagogical practices [15]. Additionally,
strong institutional leadership and partnerships with industry are crucial for fostering effective training
environments and enhancing teacher competencies [3]. Overall, these components collectively contribute to the
sustainable development of TVET systems, addressing both educational and economic objectives [16].
METHODOLOGY
Content Validity Index is one of the analysis techniques used to assess the relevancy, clear and essential of a
criteria list, based on expert judgment. In this study, eight experts have been identified beforehand based on their
expertise in the field of TVET, teacher education and industry sector. Several criteria of experts have been set
for expert selection including;
i. Has more than five (5) years of professional experience in a relevant field, such as Technical and
Vocational Education and Training (TVET) or Teacher Education.
ii. Currently holds a managerial or leadership position within a related institution (e.g., university,
polytechnic, skills training centre, or ministry/agency involved in TVET or education).
iii. Possesses at least a Master's degree in TVET, Education, or a closely related field.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2288
www.rsisinternational.org
The use of expert panels to evaluate assessment items contributes to the robustness of the CVI, which improved
the overall validity of the instruments used in various educational settings [17]. This systematic approach not
only enhances the credibility of the assessments but also offers consistency among evaluators or the experts,
thereby increasing inter-rater reliability and effectively leading to more trustworthy educational outcomes [18].
As recommended by [19], 8-12 experts are suitable for content validation evaluation. Upon selected, experts
were given with online survey for data collection. The instrument used were a set of questionnaires with item
related to the criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level. A 4-point Likert scale
was used to measure the relevancy of each item as it is able to avoid a neutral midpoint value [20]. The scales
are 1= not relevant, 2 = somewhat relevant, 3 = quite relevant, and 4 = highly relevant.
To assess the content validity, two analyses were used, namely Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and
average Scale-Level Content Validity Index (S-CVI/Ave). To calculate I-CVI, the total number of experts giving
rating of 3 or 4 were divided by the total number of experts. For above six experts, the value should not be less
than 0.78 [21]. Item with value near to 0.78 need to be reviewed while item with low I-CVI need to be deleted
[19]. On the other hand, to calculate the S-CVI/Ave, the total items that were scored as relevant (I-CVI >.78)
divided by the total number of items. The recommended value for S-CVI/Ave is 0.90 [20].
The instrument used in this study consist of 36 items related to the criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher
Education program at Master’s Level. The criteria were identified in the earlier phase of this study through
systematic literature review. There are eight domains studied in this study. Each domain consists of several
elements related to the criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level. The domains
are Advanced Sustainable Curriculum, Transformational Leadership in TVET, Sustainable Research and
Innovation, Capacity Building of Master’s degree TVET educators, Digital and Technological Integration,
Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership, Policy and Advocacy in TVET, and Sustainable Institutional
Management. The structure of the instrument is shown in Table 1.
The instrument was converted into digital instrument, which is the Google Form, for online survey involving
eight experts. The data collection process begins with identifying the experts and getting their consensus to
participate in this study. Upon agreement, experts were given the online survey instrument by email and asked
to answer the survey within a week of time. Gentle reminder was given after three days of first email followed
by email of appreciation for every response. After that, the analysis of CVI begin with eight returns Google Form
from eight experts. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel to have better formula calculation.
Table 1 The Structure Of The Instrument
Domain
No Element/Item
Advanced Sustainable Curriculum
5
Transformational Leadership in TVET
6
Sustainable Research and Innovation
6
Capacity Building of Master’s degree TVET educators
5
Digital and Technological Integration
4
Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership
4
Policy and Advocacy in TVET
3
Sustainable Institutional Management
3
Total
36
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2289
www.rsisinternational.org
RESULT
An I-CVI was calculated for each item as shown in Table 1. To further evaluate the items, a modified kappa
statistic (K) was used to adjust any chance of agreement between experts. It is important to calculate the kappa
value since high CVI can occurred by chance. By referring to [19], the good score of Modified Kappa is between
0.60- 0.74 while greater than 0.75 is excellent. To kept an item, it needs to have the value of I-CVI of above 0.78
with kappa score greater than 0.75. item with lower value for both I-CVI and kappa need to be revised ore
removed. Furthermore, to measure the level of content validity of the overall criteria, S-CVI/Ave was calculated
by averaging all the I-CVI scores of all the items. The S-CVI value calculated to be 0.896 meaning that the
criterion has a strong content validity.
From the analysis, all 36 criteria achieved an Item-Level CVI (I-CVI) of 1.00 indicating all experts agreed on
the relevancy of the criteria to be in the sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s Level. The
probability of chance agreement for these criteria is (Pc): 0.003906. it means that there is only a 0.39% chance
that all eight experts would agree by luck. Since the chance is extremely low, the Modified Kappa values become
very high giving the value of Modified Kappa (κ) for all items are 1.000.
Overall, based on the threshold recommended by [21], for eight experts the minimum acceptable I-CVI is 0.88.
As in this study, all items met this threshold, achieving perfect agreement (I-CVI = 1.00). The overall S-CVI/Ave
of 0.896 indicates strong content validity. The modified Kappa value of 1.00 for all criteria signifies excellent
agreement beyond chance. Table 2 shows the 36 items with I-CVI value and Modified Kappa.
Table 2: Value Of I-Cvi And Modified Kappa
Item
I-CVI
Evaluation
Advanced Sustainable Curriculum
1. Outcome-based learning should be one of the core principles in this
framework.
1
Excellent
2. Sustainability elements such as SDG integration should be incorporated
into curriculum design.
1
Excellent
3.
Transdisciplinary approaches should be part of the curriculum design.
1
Excellent
4.
Technology should be actively used to enhance the curriculum
1
Excellent
5. Including a capstone project will help Master’s degree TVET educators
apply what they've learned in real-world settings.
1
Excellent
Transformational Leadership in TVET
6. The framework should prepare Master’s degree TVET educators to
engage in policy development and discussions.
1
Excellent
7.
Strategic thinking should be key leadership skills in the program.
1
Excellent
8.
Decision-making should be key leadership skills in the program.
1
Excellent
9.
Ethical leadership needs to be emphasized in the framework.
1
Excellent
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2290
www.rsisinternational.org
10. Master's degree TVET educators should be equipped to manage and lead
change effectively.
1
1
Excellent
11. Educational governance should be covered as a leadership responsibility.
1
1
Excellent
Sustainable Research and Innovation
12. Master's degree TVET educators should engage in applied research that
addresses real issues in TVET.
1
1
Excellent
13. The research agenda should be aligned with industry needs and challenges.
1
1
Excellent
14. Master's degree TVET educators should be encouraged to use action
research in their practice.
1
1
Excellent
15. Master's degree TVET educators should be encouraged to use case studies
in their practice.
1
1
Excellent
16. The framework should support innovation of research outcomes.
1
1
Excellent
17. The framework should support commercialization of research outcomes.
1
1
Excellent
Capacity Building of Master’s degree TVET educators
18. Coaching should be part of Master’s degree TVET educators’
development.
1
1
Excellent
19. Mentoring should be
part
of
Master’s
degree
TVET
educators’
development.
1
1
Excellent
20. Reflective practice should be encouraged to improve teaching.
1
1
Excellent
21. Master's degree TVET educators need strong skills in curriculum design
and development.
1
1
Excellent
22. Mastery of educational technology (EdTech) should be a core
competency.
1
1
Excellent
Digital and Technological Integration
23. Master's degree TVET educators should know how to use data analytic to
improve teaching and learning.
1
1
Excellent
24. Understanding AI is essential for modern TVET Teacher Education
program.
1
1
Excellent
25. The AR/VR tools should be incorporated into TVET teaching and learning
processes.
1
1
Excellent
26. Using Learning Management Systems (LMS) should be part of TVET
teaching practice.
1
1
Excellent
Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2291
www.rsisinternational.org
27. The framework should support collaboration between government,
industry and academia.
1
1
Excellent
28. The framework should have an internationalization perspective and
connections.
1
1
Excellent
29. The framework should involve CSR projects that benefit the community.
1
1
Excellent
30. The alumni network should be part of the TVET ecosystem.
1
1
Excellent
Policy and Advocacy in TVET
31. Master's degree TVET educators should understand the current policy
landscape in TVET.
1
1
Excellent
32. The framework should address the national skills development agenda.
1
1
Excellent
33. There should be a strong link between Master's TVET Teacher education
programs and labour market needs.
1
1
Excellent
Sustainable Institutional Management
34. Master's degree TVET educators should be familiar with strategic resource
planning and management.
1
1
Excellent
35. Quality assurance systems should be part of institutional development.
1
1
Excellent
36. Risk and crisis management should be included to prepare institutions for
uncertainty.
1
1
Excellent
DISCUSSION
The aim of this article is to measure the content validity of the criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher Education
program at Master’s level involving eight experts in TVET and teacher education sectors. The content validity
of the Criteria for sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s Level was determined using the
CVI process outlined by [19] that includes two measurement, I-CVI and the overall content validity (S-CVI).
Overall, all criteria show excellent relevant to the sustainable framework and the S-CVI meets the criterion of
0.90 recommended by [19] indicating the overall criteria has strong content validity. Based on this finding, it
can be concluded that the eight domains proposed in this study is relevant to be included in the sustainable TVET
Teacher Education program at Master’s level.
As aforementioned, the eight domains of sustainable TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level as
studied in this article comprises of Advanced Sustainable Curriculum, Transformational Leadership in TVET,
Sustainable Research and Innovation, Capacity Building of Master’s degree TVET educators, Digital and
Technological Integration, Stakeholder Engagement and Partnership, Policy and Advocacy in TVET, and
Sustainable Institutional Management. All these domains can be found discussed well in terms of its important
to the TVET Teacher Education. It is undeniable how each of the domains can successfully influence the
sustainability of the program based on the past research and this has been further validated by the experts in
person through this study. For instance, [22] had clearly stated that TVET teacher education programs can
address the skilled workers shortage by enhancing curriculum design to include experiential and industry-based
learning, investing in modern training facilities, and ensuring continuous teacher training to align with evolving
workforce demands and industry standards. This is inline with the domain of Stakeholder Engagement and
Partnership which focusing on the role of the stakeholder including the industries. Study by [23] also had
supported this by stated that TVET teacher education programs need to align the competencies with industry
standards, enhance faculty qualifications, improve course organization, integrate relevant skills, and foster a
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2292
www.rsisinternational.org
supportive learning environment, thereby addressing the shortage of skilled tradespeople in the workforce.
Furthermore, effective collaboration between vocational education institutions and industry partners is essential
for aligning curricula with current and future job market demands [24].
To further compare the finding in this study to existing TVET teacher education framework, the existing TVET
teacher education frameworks primarily emphasize traditional pedagogical approaches and often lack alignment
with industry demands, resulting in gaps in teacher qualifications and competencies [25]. In contrast, this study
finding advocate for a more flexible, competency-based model that integrates labor market components,
emphasizes continuous professional development, and utilizes qualified teacher-trainers skilled in adult learning
[26]. Additionally, the reforms aim to address the bureaucratic nature of current standards, which can marginalize
professional knowledge, by promoting a more context-sensitive understanding of teaching practices.
Furthermore, the finding in this study suggests incorporating broader competencies, such as digital pedagogical
skills, to better prepare instructors for the evolving global workforce [27]. In all, the reforms seek to enhance the
quality and relevance of TVET teacher education, ensuring that educators are equipped to meet contemporary
educational and industry needs.
Overall, improving TVET Teacher Education program in regards of its sustainability is crucial to ensure future
TVET teachers are competent as skilled educators with both pedagogical and industrial skills. As according to
[24], vocational education teachers need for training are uniformly high across various demographics, indicating
systemic issues rather than group-specific challenges. It is important to revisit national training frameworks to
better align with the demands of future curriculum and labour market requirements. Nevertheless, TVET teacher
themselves must have the initiative to further developed themselves in order to stay relevant to the industry. By
having professional development that can enhance their competencies and self-efficacy, even a novice TVET
teachers can address the challenges in modern TVET setting [4].
CONCLUSION
All 36 criteria demonstrate strong content validity and excellent expert agreement. No revisions are required for
any of the criteria. To date, there is still no TVET Teacher Education program at Master’s level that focus on the
sustainability element. The criteria will then be further validated by the TVET Teacher Education program
lecturers from public universities in Malaysia. Once the criteria have been validated, it will be published as new
contribution to the body of knowledge that will benefit all the stakeholders especially in Malaysia.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia through the Fundamental
Research Grant Scheme Early Career (FRGS-EC/1/2024/SS109/UPSI/03/6).
REFERENCES
1. Varma, C., & Malik, S. (2024). TVET in the 21st Century: A Focus on Innovative Teaching and
Competency Indicators. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.112516
2. Wang, M. (2024). A Multidimensional Examination of the Role of Vocational Education Teachers From
the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 9(4), 47.
https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v9i4.1480
3. Kelvin, J. (2022). Perspectives of ADB on the Education and Training of TVET Teachers (pp. 53
65). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6474-8_4
4. Abd Wahab, N., Ali, D. F., Ahmad, A. R., & Kamaruzaman, N. (2024). Fundamental Elements for
Self- Initiated Professional Development among TVET Teachers: A Literature Review. International
Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4).
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13- i4/23814
5. Kayyali, M. (2025). Aligning Vocational Education With Industry Needs. 148.
https://doi.org/10.4018/979- 8-3693-9496-0.ch001
6. Brown, M. E. (2017). The tradies’ entrance into teaching: the challenges in designing teacher education
for vocational education and training in schools. International Journal of Training Research, 15(1),
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2293
www.rsisinternational.org
7184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2017.1350199
7. Chan, S. (2020). Teaching a Trade (pp. 103121). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
15- 2129-4_6
8. Chukwu, D. U., Omeje, H. O., Ojo, S. A., Okekpa, A. A., Vershima, M. N., & Kechere, I. C. (2024).
Industry Evolving Needs and TVET Institutional Offerings: A Qualitative Response to the On-Demand
Skill Gap in Nigerian Woodwork Technology Institution. International Journal of Vocational
Education and Training Research. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241001.11
9. Calles, A. B. (2025). Why Technical-Vocational Education Must Be a National Priority. 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.64591/fgrnwg05
10. Wu, X., & Ye, Y. (2018). Teaching in Technical and Vocational Education (pp. 175204). Springer,
Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0839-0_5
11. He, Q. (2022). Indonesia TVET Teacher Training: Policy and Implementation to Meet Industry
Demands (pp. 183214). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6474-8_12
12. Abd Wahab, N., Ali, D. F., & Ahmad, A. R. (2024). Professional Development for Novice TVET
Teachers: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive
Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i4/23654
13. Tampang, B. L. L., & Wonggo, D. (2018). Teacher Professionalism in Technical and Vocational
Education. 306(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012017
14. Bhandari, U. (2025). Chasing Quality TVET Curricula. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education
and Training, 19(1), 3647. https://doi.org/10.3126/tvet.v19i1.75719
15. Rawkins, C. (2019). A Global Overview of TVET Teaching and Training: Current issues, trends and
recommendations. https://www.ilo.org/sector/activities/sectoral-meetings/WCMS_675275/lang--
en/index.htm
16. Rojewski, J. W. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Technical and Vocational Education and Training
(pp. 1939). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_2
17. Fei, W. & Sahid, S. (2024). Content validation and content validity index calculation for
entrepreneurial behavior instruments among vocational college students in China. Multidisciplinary
Reviews, 7(9), 2024187. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024187
18. Han, J.-J., & Yoo, D.-M. (2024). Implementation and evaluation of portfolio assessment in the
Introduction to Clinical Medicine” course at a Korean medical school: analysis of the content validity
index and inter-rater reliability. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3868161/v1
19. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content
validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459467.
doi:10.1002/nur.20199
20. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being
reported? Critiqueand recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489497.
doi:10.1002/nur.20147
21. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382
385. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
22. Bangayan, O., Navasca, M., Navasca, R., Abaquita-Espiritu, J., & Calaranan, M. (2025). Innovating
Pedagogical Approaches in Industrial Technology and Livelihood Education: A Comparative Study
of BTVTED and BTED Programs in Enhancing Technical Competency and Workforce Readiness in
Philippine State Universities. 7(SI2), 676692. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7isi2.235
23. Rivera, J. C., & Baptista, V. E. G. (2024). Investigating the policies, the resources and gaps in the
competencies of Bachelor of Technical-Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTEd) prescribed by:
TESDA and K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum and a proposed curriculum revision for Bachelor of
Technical - Vocational Teacher Education in the Philippines. Divine Word International Journal of
Management and Humanities, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.62025/dwijmh.v3i4.95
24. Al-Ghonmeein, J. S. A., Al-Saaideh, M. A., & Abushwemeh, Z. H. (2025). Training Needs of
Vocational Education Teachers for Effective BTEC Curriculum Implementation in Jordan.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(6), 909927.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.41
25. Rivera, J. C., & Baptista, V. E. G. (2024). Investigating the policies, the resources and gaps in the
competencies of Bachelor of Technical-Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTEd) prescribed by:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025
Page 2294
www.rsisinternational.org
TESDA and K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum and a proposed curriculum revision for Bachelor of
Technical - Vocational Teacher Education in the Philippines. Divine Word International Journal of
Management and Humanities, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.62025/dwijmh.v3i4.95
26. Spöttll, G. (2009). Teacher education for TVET in Europe and Asia: the comprehensive requirements.
Journal of Technical Education and Training, 1 (1).
http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/277/0
27. Mansor, M., Mohamed, Z., Khan, A., & Sidek, M. (2024). Comparative Analysis of TVET Instructor
Competency Standards: Insights from Malaysia and Beyond. 6569.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icted62334.2024.10844672