INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2311
www.rsisinternational.org
Conceptualizing the Child-Author Development Programme (CADP)
as the Missing Element in African Civic Education Programmes
Technics Ikechi Nwosu
The African Science Fiction Project / Child-Author Development Programme (CADP)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000191
Received: 01 September 2025; Accepted: 07 September 2025; Published: 07 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Civic Education programmes in Africa primarily focuses on citizenship, governance, democracy, and social
responsibility. However, these programmes often overlook critical elements necessary for shaping future-ready
citizens, particularly in the domains of scientific leadership, technological innovation, and knowledge
production. This paper conceptuates the Child-Author Development Programme (CADP) as a missing but
essential component of African Civic Education. It argues that CADP extends the Civic Education agenda by
integrating African Technological Nationalism, African Scientism, and the Science-Technology-Society
(STS) discourse. We argue here that these novel Civic/Citizenship Education elements are capable of producing
a generation of young thinkers capable of shaping Africa’s future through scientific storytelling. The paper
situates CADP within broader Civic Education or Citizenship Education frameworks, examines its role in
creating African Technological Citizenship, and presents a case for its institutionalization within African
education policies. By positioning CADP as both a pedagogical intervention and a civic awakening tool, the
discourse pushes beyond conventional educational thinking, advocating for a civic model in which technology
and science are not peripheral luxuries but intrinsic rights and duties of the citizen. Our re-imagination of civic
literacy asserts that an African citizen’s preparedness for the 21st century must not be measured by mere political
consciousness or patriotic sentiment, but by the readiness to defend, advance, and co-create indigenous scientific
and technological capacities as part of their social obligations. CADP therefore redefines “public responsibility”
to encompass technological patriotism, “civic rights” to include the right to technological alternatives, and
“social causes” to elevate the quest for a national technological identity to the level of the most fundamental
civic mission.
Keywords: African Civic Education; Child-Author Development Programme (CADP); African Technological
Nationalism; Science-Technology-Society (STS) Literacy; Technological Sovereignty/Independence; Scientific
Storytelling; Indigenous Innovation; Civic Technological Identity; Civic Science Fiction.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2312
www.rsisinternational.org
INTRODUCTION
Civic Education, also known as Citizenship Education in some countries, has historically focused on political
participation, rights and responsibilities, rule of law, and governance. While these themes are crucial for effective
citizenship development, they do not sufficiently prepare African youth to engage with global technological
transformations and the challenges of scientific literacy in the 21st-century technological development
trajectories. The Child-Author Development Programme (CADP) emerges as an innovative solution,
blending Civic Education with scientific storytelling to mobilize technological awareness, critical thinking, and
future-oriented leadership in the people. The programme's slogan, “Making World Leaders Out of African
Children,” embodies its transformative potential.
Whereas traditional civic literacy equips young people with the political vocabulary to navigate governance
structures, CADP furnishes them with the technological vocabulary and imaginative frameworks needed to
actively participate in shaping the socio-technical architecture of their societies (Winner, 1986). The civic
imagination must therefore be broadened: the citizen of the future is as much a custodian of democratic values
as they are a guardian of technological sovereignty (Nwosu, 2025a).
From patriotism, CADP imbricates technological patriotism a sense of pride, protection, and proactive
engagement with homegrown science and technology as a symbolic and material defense of national dignity.
From responsibility, CADP implicates the notion that society, through its divergent social groups and organized
civic actors, bears collective responsibility for the survival, expansion, and success of every invention or
technological breakthrough achieved by fellow citizens. From participation in local governance and social
causes, CADP embeds the conviction that the search for a nation’s technological identity is not a marginal
hobby but the most fundamental social cause of the 21st century for every citizen (technological asymmetry
Akinyemi, 2019) who wishes to see Africa’s independence deepen beyond the political to the technological
domain. From democracy and human rights, CADP extends this conversation to include the right to
technological alternatives (Mubangizi, 2020) the recognition that citizens must be empowered to seek,
support, and utilize alternative technological solutions, especially when such alternatives are homegrown or Pan-
African in origin, thereby imbuing the nation with fresh technological capabilities.
The Limitations of Traditional Civic Education in Africa
Most Civic Education curricula across African countries emphasize the following:
1. Political literacy: Understanding constitutions, governance, human rights, and democracy.
2. Ethical and moral education: Instilling values of honesty, responsibility, and patriotism.
3. Community engagement: Encouraging participation in local governance and social causes.
While these are foundational, they are insufficient for the realities of the present century. The African citizen is
confronted not only by questions of political order but also by the problem of technological asymmetry (Castells,
2010), a condition in which the capacity to innovate, adapt, and control technological tools lies predominantly
outside the continent. The fact is that the existing Civic Education frameworks seldom interrogate Africa’s
technological dependence, the geopolitical consequences of imported innovation models, or the civic duties that
arise from living in an age where science and technology determine national power, social stability, and even
cultural survival.
The absence of Science-Technology-Society (STS) discourse in Civic Education effectively divorces the African
child from the most consequential conversations shaping humanity’s trajectory. Without structured exposure to
technological decision-making as a civic matter, African students grow into citizens whose engagement with
science is primarily as consumers rather than shapers. They become adept at defending political rights but remain
silent when foreign technologies undermine national security, exploit local resources, or erode cultural
autonomy. This silence is not born of apathy but of an educational gap a gap CADP is uniquely designed to
fill (Nwosu, 2025b).
Moreover, traditional Civic Education has not sufficiently problematized the role of indigenous innovation in
the formation of the African state. While nationalism in the political sense has been celebrated, technological
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2313
www.rsisinternational.org
nationalism – the belief that Africa must chart its own scientific and technological course has been left largely
unarticulated. Without it, Africa’s political sovereignty risks becoming symbolic, as technological sovereignty
becomes the true determinant of independence in the modern era (Ocheni, 2015).
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
This study is grounded in three intersecting theoretical traditions: Science-Technology-Society (STS)
Studies, Civic Republicanism, and African Technological Nationalism. Together, these frameworks provide
the intellectual foundation for conceptualizing the Child-Author Development Programme (CADP) as a missing
but essential component of African Civic Education.
First, STS Theory emphasizes that science and technology are not neutral forces but are embedded within
political, cultural, and social structures (Winner, 1986; Feenberg, 1999). By integrating STS into civic education,
CADP reframes technological literacy as civic competence, ensuring that African children are not passive
consumers of technology but active participants in shaping socio-technical futures.
Second, Civic Republicanism offers a model of citizenship that prioritizes civic virtue, collective responsibility,
and the pursuit of the common good (Pettit, 1997; Osler & Starkey, 2018). CADP extends this framework by
recasting the quest for technological independence/sovereignty as a civic duty, aligning with republican ideals
of self-rule and independence but situating them within Africa’s contemporary technological struggles.
Third, the framework of African Technological Nationalism (Rodney, 1972; Ocheni, 2015; Nwosu, 2025a)
builds on the argument that true political sovereignty is unattainable without technological sovereignty. This
perspective asserts that Civic Education must cultivate technological patriotism, which is the obligation of
citizens to support, defend, and advance indigenous scientific knowledge and innovations as a national priority.
In weaving these theories together, CADP is theorized as a civic-technological framework that
reconceptualizes citizenship in Africa beyond mere political membership to include active participation in the
advancement of scientific and technological futures.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2314
www.rsisinternational.org
METHODOLOGY
This study employs a qualitative conceptual research design embedded in critical discourse analysis (CDA)
and theoretical synthesis. The methodology reflects the paper’s purpose which is to interrogate existing
African Civic Education frameworks and to propose CADP as a transformative model that integrates
technological citizenship into civic life.
Conceptual Analysis
1. The research systematically reviews and critiques dominant themes in African Civic Education curricula
(Akinyemi, 2019; Osler & Starkey, 2018), identifying gaps related to science, technology, and
innovation.
2. It draws on primary texts in STS scholarship (Latour, 2005; Cutcliffe & Mitcham, 2017) and African
political economy (Rodney, 1972; Mkandawire, 2005) to establish the conceptual parameters for CADP
as a civic innovation.
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
1. Using CDA, the study examines how African Civic Education has historically framed citizenship around
political and moral participation, while neglecting technological participation.
2. The analysis pays attention to narratives of technological dependency (Castells, 2010; Schwab, 2017)
and evaluates how CADP reframes these narratives through child-authored scientific storytelling.
Theoretical Synthesis
1. Insights from STS, Civic Republicanism, and African Technological Nationalism are synthesized to
produce a framework where technological sovereignty is articulated as civic responsibility.
2. CADP is then situated as a pedagogical intervention and societal investment that embodies this synthesis,
offering both theoretical innovation and practical civic application.
This methodology is appropriate for a conceptual-political study of this nature because it does not only describe
educational practices but redefines the epistemological basis of Civic Education in Africa. In employing CDA
and theoretical synthesis, the study contributes both to scholarly debates in STS and to applied civic policy
discourses in Africa.
The CADP as a Technological Extension of African Civic Education
The Child-Author Development Programme (CADP) introduces a science-conscious Civic Education
model through integrating the following essential elements:
African Technological Nationalism as Civic Responsibility
CADP positions technological self-reliance beyond the exclusive specialist concern for engineers and scientists
but as a core civic responsibility, implicating diverse social groups, networks, and actors. This reframing
ensures that every child understands the cultural, economic, and political stakes of indigenous technological
production (Rodney, 1972). Through its narrative model – recasting real-life African inventors and scientists as
scientistic personae in alternative futures CADP demystifies technology, dismantles the myth of African
incapacity (Nwosu, 2025c), and constructs a public memory that honors the continent’s overlooked
scientific legacy.
Here, technological nationalism is not xenophobic rejection of foreign technology but a principled insistence on
the right to technological choice and the capacity to produce such choices (Chang, 2008). Civic responsibility
is reframed: to fail to protect and advance indigenous science is to fail in one’s duty as a citizen, just as
surely as neglecting to vote or pay taxes.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2315
www.rsisinternational.org
Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Literacy
The Child-Professor of Science and Technology Studies (STS) designation formalizes technological literacy
as a civic competence (Cutcliffe & Mitcham, 2017). In a global order where policy decisions (from climate
change adaptation to cybersecurity) are deeply entangled with science and technology, the ability to critically
interpret, evaluate, and influence scientific discourse becomes indispensable for full citizenship (Feenberg,
1999).
This STS literacy within CADP is multi-layered, viz.:
1. Demystifying technology: Training students to read technological phenomena not as neutral artifacts
but as products of cultural values, political choices, and economic interests.
2. Reimagining science leadership: Using science-fiction narratives to propose African-centered solutions
(Achebe, 2012), thus legitimizing the African child as both a participant and a thought leader in
technological discourse.
3. Bridging academia and public engagement: Structuring curricula to ensure that the creative act of
storytelling is underpinned by rigorous research, making it both an imaginative and scholarly exercise.
Economic and Policy Implications of Science Storytelling
Civic Education rarely considers the economic dimensions of knowledge production. CADP’s financial
incentive structure (₦20,000/₦30,000 per accepted story and ₦100,000 for Child-Professors of STS) reframes
intellectual work as economically valuable labor. This disrupts the persistent undervaluation of African
intellectual production, especially that of youth. In linking civic participation to tangible economic rewards,
CADP redefines policy advocacy (Smith, 2021) and states thus: young authors are not necessarily passive
observers but actually stakeholders in the shaping of Africa’s technological policies. This financial model has
two implications:
1. It can inspire public policy reforms to support creative industries as knowledge industries (Drucker,
1993).
2. It offers a replicable model for incentivizing youth participation in other civic-technical domains.
Institutionalizing the CADP in Civic Education Policies
For CADP to fulfill its transformative potential, it must not remain an isolated or experimental initiative. Its
adoption into national education frameworks is imperative if Africa is to transition from a technologically
dependent continent to one capable of determining its own scientific future. This institutionalization requires a
multilayered approach involving policy recognition, academic integration, and sustainable funding mechanisms.
Policy Recognition
Governments must formally recognize science-conscious storytelling as a legitimate instrument of Civic
Education. Such recognition demands the redefinition of civic literacy to explicitly include technological
literacy as a core competence. This would entail revising Civic Education syllabi across primary and secondary
levels to integrate CADP methodologies narrative-based STS learning, historical reclamation of African
inventors, and scenario building for indigenous technological futures.
Policy recognition also requires governments to legislate the right to technological alternatives. In the same
way that human rights charters protect freedom of speech or association, there should be protections ensuring
that citizens can access and develop homegrown technological solutions without structural bias toward imported
systems. These reframing positions technological sovereignty, that is technological independence, as an
inalienable civic right.
Furthermore, this integration would bridge ministries traditionally separated by bureaucratic silos Ministries
of Education, Science and Technology, Youth Development, and Culture aligning their mandates toward a
common goal, which is to produce science-literate, policy-conscious citizens (Latour, 2005).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2316
www.rsisinternational.org
Collaboration with Universities and Scholars
The role of Professors as academic moderators of the Child-Professor of STS designation underscores the
necessity of university partnerships. Higher education institutions, often gatekeepers of specialized knowledge,
must break from their ivory tower model to engage directly with pre-university learners. CADP offers such a
bridge: professors bring academic rigor, while child-authors bring imaginative freshness and civic urgency.
University collaboration could extend into several domains:
1. Curriculum Co-Design ensuring CADP modules meet both academic and civic competency
benchmarks.
2. Mentorship Networks – connecting child-authors with researchers in relevant STEM and social science
fields.
3. Joint Research Outputs producing co-authored papers or public reports on African Science Fiction
as a civic tool, thereby situating CADP within global STS scholarship.
These collaborations would not only legitimize CADP academically but also help reposition African universities
as active co-creators of civic-technological identity rather than passive transmitters of imported knowledge
systems (Mkandawire, 2005).
Expansion through Public and Private Sponsorship
Just as Civic Education is publicly funded in most African countries, CADP requires structured, sustainable
funding mechanisms to thrive. The concept of reward slots – financial awards per published story democratizes
participation by signaling that intellectual contribution is a recognized form of national service (Nwosu, 2025a).
Potential funding avenues include:
1. Old Students Associations: leveraging alumni networks to sponsor stories from their alma maters, thus
creating a legacy link between past and future generations.
2. Corporate Sponsorships: positioning CADP sponsorship as part of corporate social responsibility,
particularly for firms in ICT, publishing, and media sectors.
3. Government Grants: integrating CADP into national youth development funds, ensuring participation
is not limited to elite schools or urban centers.
The funding structure itself sends a profound civic message, namely knowledge work is productive work. Just
as physical infrastructure is built by engineers and financed by public funds, cultural and intellectual
infrastructure, in this case the technological imagination of Africa, must be equally resourced.
Civic Import and Societal Value of the CHILD-AUTHOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CADP)
While the CHILD-AUTHOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CADP) commands attention as an
unprecedented state-branding mechanism, its deeper potency lies in its function as a civic institution a public
architecture of thought, imagination, and generational responsibility.
In nurturing the intellectual creativity of African children and anchoring their development in the challenges and
triumphs of Africa’s technological destiny, the CADP performs the critical work of nation-building through civic
cultivation. It reframes the child beyond being a dependent recipient of future governance, to being a conscious
participant in the current civic conversation, equipped with narrative tools to shape the society they inherit. The
following notions then become salient within this narrative:
A Civic School of the Future Citizen
The CADP is effectively a civic preparatory institute, cultivating children for academic success and, more
potently, for active citizenship. Each story written by a child is an exercise in public reasoning, moral
imagination, and societal projection. In this way, the child-author becomes a proto-citizen, a thinker in training,
learning how to govern through fiction.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2317
www.rsisinternational.org
Democratization of the Intellectual Sphere
Through extending the invitation to write and think deeply to children from diverse regions, faith communities,
and socioeconomic contexts, the CADP contributes to civic equity. It decentralizes the space of high-concept
discourse, permitting children in rural and urban Nigeria, and eventually across Africa, to speak into the public
imagination on equal terms. This is a revolution in participatory civic literacy.
Strengthening Civil Society through Narrative Mobilization
The program operationalizes a form of grassroots civic infrastructure old students’ associations, churches,
families, local educators, and scholars become stakeholders in a shared intellectual mission. This narrative-
centered model unites civil society around the common task of future-building, transforming support for the
child-author into a broader ethos of intergenerational solidarity.
Cultivating Ethical Consciousness through Storytelling
Many stories developed within the CADP are not only futuristic – they are also ethical. CADP stories are ethical
laboratories. Children grapple with themes of justice, environment, power, equity, and scientific responsibility.
This nurtures what might be called a civic ethics of technology a literacy of conscience that is rare even in
adult policymaking circles. In this sense, the CADP is building a moral reservoir for the future of African public
life.
Civic Nationalism Anchored in Technological Identity
The CADP promotes a new kind of civic nationalism one rooted in a shared aspiration for African technological
sovereignty and not only in exclusionary identity. In situating the African child as the protagonist of scientific
progress, the programme invites children and adults alike to take up national belonging as a civic project, and
not only as a constitutional status.
In sum, the CADP is a complex development initiative it is a civic renaissance, quietly restoring the role of
imagination, community, and ethical agency in the construction of society. It offers a model of civic engagement
that is non-adversarial, non-violent, non-polemical, but radically transformational. Through story, the CADP
renders possible a civic future in which Africa’s children inherit nations the design of which they participated
in. The CADP thus projects Africa’s children as capable of designing the continent’s scientific and technological
future if given the chance, a feat which challenges the adult generation.
The CADP as Societal Investment in the Scientific and Technological Imagination of the Next Generation
At its most visionary height, the CHILD-AUTHOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CADP) represents
a strategic societal investment in what may be called imaginative capital the capacity of a people to envision,
narrate, and innovate their own future. Through child-authored stories rooted in science fiction and technological
possibilities, the CADP initiates a generational shift: it prepares African societies to think forward, dream
scientifically, and act technologically.
This is beyond investment in literature or education; it is a cultural investment in the very infrastructure of
thought in how young Africans learn to perceive the world and imagine their agency within it. Here, the
following implications become visible:
Constructing a Generation of Thinkers, Not Only Workers
The CADP departs radically from traditional educational investments that emphasize rote productivity. Instead,
it stakes value on the creative foresight of children their capacity to imagine African solutions to African
problems through narrative simulations. This is how the next generation of inventors, climate scientists,
cybernetic ethicists, and policy engineers is spiritually and intellectually born. In allowing, say, a child in Aba
or Minna to imagine a quantum satellite that prevents drought in Sahelian nations, society declares: “Your mind
matters.”
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2318
www.rsisinternational.org
The Valences: Strong Cognitive and Emotional Attractions
The CADP exerts cognitive and emotional magnetism on society at multiple levels:
1. For Families: It evokes pride, reshaping family identity around the intellectual promise of their child.
The child-author becomes a totem of familial contribution to national destiny.
2. For Educators: It revitalizes teaching purpose. Teachers and moderators are invited into a higher calling,
being to guide minds that will shape new worlds.
3. For Civil Society: The programme becomes a moral attraction point, inviting NGOs, religious
communities, and alumni bodies to sponsor children, and therein the scientific soul of the nation.
4. For the State: It offers a narrative of hope and soft power a generational story of national ascent
through brains, not borders.
These valences bind multiple sectors of society in a common magnetic field of purpose.
Long-Term Civic Outcomes
The societal returns on this investment are not speculative – they are structural and include the following:
Civic Rationality: Children trained to tell technologically grounded stories become adults who reason about
society not only politically or emotionally, but technically. This cultivates a rational citizenry that can hold future
governments accountable with nuance and insight.
Innovation Readiness: A society saturated with scientific imagination becomes culturally open to technological
adaptation. The CADP thus lays the narrative groundwork for future tech-driven industries, education reforms,
and policymaking.
Inclusive Aspirations: By raising the intellectual status of children across economic divides, the programme
engineers hope equitya deep civic good. It tells every child: “You are permitted to imagine.”
Narrative Continuity and Legacy: The CADP builds an intellectual ancestry. Future generations will read
these early child-authored texts as foundational civic literature documents that anticipated Africa’s rise from
the mouths of its children.
To invest in the CADP is to seed the intellectual and technological future of Africa with dignity and intention.
It is to say, without apology or hesitation, that African minds, even young ones, are capable of shaping planetary
futures.
CONCLUSION
In conceptualizing CADP as a missing component of African Civic Education, this paper has argued that the
civic curriculum in Africa must expand beyond political rights and governance to incorporate
technological nationalism, scientific storytelling, and STS advocacy as foundational pillars. CADP does not
displace traditional Civic Education; rather, it elevates it, transforming Civic Education from a political-
literacy project into a technological literacy and citizenship project.
In embedding African Technological Nationalism into the civic fabric, CADP cultivates a generation for whom
technological independence is not an abstract ideal but a lived responsibility. Through the scientistic personae
model, children engage with African scientific heritage as an indelible historical fact and more potently as active
narrative material for reimagining Africa’s place in the technological world order. Through financial incentives
and academic recognition, CADP reframes civic participation as both intellectually rewarding and materially
valuable (Sen, 1999). Therefore, institutionalizing CADP within national curricula would have several cascading
effects, some of which include:
1. Science-Literate Citizenry ensuring that technological debates are not confined to experts but are
accessible to all citizens as a matter of civic concern.
2. Policy-Conscious Youth raising a generation capable of articulating and defending the right to
technological alternatives.
3. Cultural Ownership of Technology (Mazrui, 1986) rooting Africa’s scientific and technological
ambitions in its own narratives, values, and developmental priorities.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2319
www.rsisinternational.org
In sum, the CADP is more than a pedagogical innovation; it is a civic necessity for Africa’s 21st-century survival
and prosperity. The task before policymakers, educators, and civic leaders is not whether CADP should be
integrated into African Civic Education, but how urgently it can be done before the technological gap between
Africa and the rest of the world becomes unbridgeable (Schwab, 2017).
Final Intellectual Position
If Civic Education has historically been the seedbed of political nationalism, then CADP is its technological
counterpart, a civic project designed to cultivate citizens who can demand just governance and also fight for a
just technological order. This dual literacy (political and technological) will determine whether Africa remains
a passive consumer of global technological currents or becomes a sovereign architect of its own scientific future.
In that sense, CADP as a technological-nationalism curriculum translating into a social movement on African
Technological Nationalism becomes the “missing element” in African Civic Education; it is the keystone without
which the entire civic project risks collapse under the pressures of technological dependence.
REFERENCES
1. Achebe, C. (2012). There was a country: A personal history of Biafra. London: Penguin Press.
2. Akinyemi, B. (2019). Civic education and national development in Africa. Lagos: Spectrum Books.
3. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Chang, H.-J. (2008). Bad Samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. London:
Bloomsbury Press.
5. Cutcliffe, S. H., & Mitcham, C. (Eds.). (2017). Visions of STS: Counterpoints in science, technology,
and society studies. New York: Routledge.
6. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York: Harper Business.
7. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London:
Routledge.
8. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.
9. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
12. Mazrui, A. A. (1986). The Africans: A triple heritage. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
13. Mkandawire, T. (2005). African intellectuals: Rethinking politics, language, gender and development.
London: Zed Books.
14. Mubangizi, J. C. (2020). Protection of human rights in Africa: A legal and institutional analysis. Pretoria:
Pretoria University Law Press.
15. Nwosu, T. I. (2025a). African technological nationalism as a civic imperative. The African Science
Fiction Project / Child-Author Development Programme. [Unpublished monograph].
16. Nwosu, T. I. (2025b). Bridging civic education and scientific storytelling in Africa. The African Science
Fiction Project / Child-Author Development Programme. [Unpublished monograph].
17. Nwosu, T. I. (2025c). Reward slots and intellectual labour valuation in African youth development. The
African Science Fiction Project / Child-Author Development Programme. [Unpublished monograph].
18. Ocheni, S. I. (2015). Technological sovereignty and African development. Abuja: National Policy Press.
19. Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2018). Extending the boundaries of civic education: Human rights, identity and
diversity. London: Routledge.
20. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Rodney, W. (1972). How Europe underdeveloped Africa. London: Bogle-L'Ouverture.
22. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York: Crown Business.
23. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
24. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). London:
Zed Books.
25. Winner, L. (1988). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
2025
Page 2320
www.rsisinternational.org
APPENDIX
Cadp Civic Education Conceptual Papers Being Conceptual Papers for Integrating the CADP Curriculum into
African Civic Education Programmes
1. Conceptualizing the CHILD-AUTHOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME as the Missing Element in
African Civic Education Programmes. (CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No. 1.)
2. Civic Education for Technological Takeoff: The Child-Author Development Programme as the
Reimagination of African Technological Citizenship. (CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No.
2.)
3. The African Child as a Technological Citizen (CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No. 3.)
4. Redefining Civic Responsibility as Scientific Leadership: the CADP Civic Education Model. (CADP
Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No. 4.)
5. CADP Stories as Informal Civic Science Education Tools. (CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers:
No. 5.)
6. Immortalizing African Inventors: The Function of CADP in Recovering the Erased Civic Memory of
African Scientific Agency. (CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No. 6.)
7. Building the Personality-Type of the Technological Nationalist: the CADP-Civic Education Model.
(CADP Civic Education Conceptual Papers: No. 7.)
PROJECT PARTNERS