
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October
Page 2312
www.rsisinternational.org
INTRODUCTION
Civic Education, also known as Citizenship Education in some countries, has historically focused on political
participation, rights and responsibilities, rule of law, and governance. While these themes are crucial for effective
citizenship development, they do not sufficiently prepare African youth to engage with global technological
transformations and the challenges of scientific literacy in the 21st-century technological development
trajectories. The Child-Author Development Programme (CADP) emerges as an innovative solution,
blending Civic Education with scientific storytelling to mobilize technological awareness, critical thinking, and
future-oriented leadership in the people. The programme's slogan, “Making World Leaders Out of African
Children,” embodies its transformative potential.
Whereas traditional civic literacy equips young people with the political vocabulary to navigate governance
structures, CADP furnishes them with the technological vocabulary and imaginative frameworks needed to
actively participate in shaping the socio-technical architecture of their societies (Winner, 1986). The civic
imagination must therefore be broadened: the citizen of the future is as much a custodian of democratic values
as they are a guardian of technological sovereignty (Nwosu, 2025a).
From patriotism, CADP imbricates technological patriotism – a sense of pride, protection, and proactive
engagement with homegrown science and technology as a symbolic and material defense of national dignity.
From responsibility, CADP implicates the notion that society, through its divergent social groups and organized
civic actors, bears collective responsibility for the survival, expansion, and success of every invention or
technological breakthrough achieved by fellow citizens. From participation in local governance and social
causes, CADP embeds the conviction that the search for a nation’s technological identity is not a marginal
hobby but the most fundamental social cause of the 21st century for every citizen (technological asymmetry
Akinyemi, 2019) who wishes to see Africa’s independence deepen beyond the political to the technological
domain. From democracy and human rights, CADP extends this conversation to include the right to
technological alternatives (Mubangizi, 2020) – the recognition that citizens must be empowered to seek,
support, and utilize alternative technological solutions, especially when such alternatives are homegrown or Pan-
African in origin, thereby imbuing the nation with fresh technological capabilities.
The Limitations of Traditional Civic Education in Africa
Most Civic Education curricula across African countries emphasize the following:
1. Political literacy: Understanding constitutions, governance, human rights, and democracy.
2. Ethical and moral education: Instilling values of honesty, responsibility, and patriotism.
3. Community engagement: Encouraging participation in local governance and social causes.
While these are foundational, they are insufficient for the realities of the present century. The African citizen is
confronted not only by questions of political order but also by the problem of technological asymmetry (Castells,
2010), a condition in which the capacity to innovate, adapt, and control technological tools lies predominantly
outside the continent. The fact is that the existing Civic Education frameworks seldom interrogate Africa’s
technological dependence, the geopolitical consequences of imported innovation models, or the civic duties that
arise from living in an age where science and technology determine national power, social stability, and even
cultural survival.
The absence of Science-Technology-Society (STS) discourse in Civic Education effectively divorces the African
child from the most consequential conversations shaping humanity’s trajectory. Without structured exposure to
technological decision-making as a civic matter, African students grow into citizens whose engagement with
science is primarily as consumers rather than shapers. They become adept at defending political rights but remain
silent when foreign technologies undermine national security, exploit local resources, or erode cultural
autonomy. This silence is not born of apathy but of an educational gap – a gap CADP is uniquely designed to
fill (Nwosu, 2025b).
Moreover, traditional Civic Education has not sufficiently problematized the role of indigenous innovation in
the formation of the African state. While nationalism in the political sense has been celebrated, technological