3. Curriculum planners are advised to integrate student-centered methods like the lollipop questioning
technique into curricula, particularly in subjects where participation and inquiry drive learning outcomes.
4. Suggested activities include peer-led review games using question-based lollipops, interclass
competitions with point rewards, and encouraging students to create their own questions to keep
enthusiasm and critical thinking alive.
5. Future research should explore the long-term effects of the Question-Based Lollipops Strategy on
participation and inquiry skills across different grade levels and subjects, with comparative studies
helping to identify best practices for fostering active, inquiry-based classrooms.
REFERENCES:
1. Andrews, J. Y. (2022). Influence of restorative practices on the middle-school classroom, as reported by
teachers: A qualitative case study.
2. Bell, U. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on critical thinking and problem-
solving skills in secondary education. Journal of Humanistic Studies and Social Dynamics, 1(01), 20–
32.
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
4. Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705–714.
5. Cronholm, S., & Göbel, H. (2022). Action design research: Integration of method support. International
Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(8), 19–47.
6. Deci, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta- analysis from
self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323.
7. Eccles, W., Roeser, R., J. S., Safavian, N., & Rubach, C. (2024). School influences on child and
adolescent development. In Developmental Science (pp. 599–636). Routledge.
8. Johnson, M. D., Sprowles, A. E., Goldenberg, K. R., Margell, S. T., & Castellino, L. (2020). Effect of a
place-based learning community on belonging, persistence, and equity gaps for first-year STEM students.
Innovative Higher Education, 45, 509–531.
9. Kapp, K., Bottema-Beutel, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist
language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 18–29.
10. Michaels, J., & Resnick, S. (2021, January). Towards improving science discussions: A framework to
guide instructional decision making. In National Association for Research in Science Teaching
Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.
11. Rachlin, H. (2018). Skinner (1938) and Skinner (1945). Behavior and Philosophy, 46, 100– 113.
12. Robles, T. G. (2023). The impact of a literacy program on summer reading setback: Providing access to
books and project-based learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina).
13. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self- determination theory
perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
61, 101860.
14. Sharma, M., & Gupta, S. (2024). Active learning strategies in higher education. In Implementing
Interactive Learning Strategies in Higher Education (pp. 32–67). IGI Global.
15. Slavin, R. E. (2020). How evidence-based linking rewards with intellectual curiosity rather than mere
compliance. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 21–31.
16. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
17. Wentzel, Y. M., & Miele, L. M. (2022). Applying a business simulation game in a flipped classroom to
enhance engagement, learning achievement, and higher-order thinking skills. Computers & Education,
183, 104494.
18. Wiliam, D., & Black, N. (2024). Student assessment: Better evidence, better decisions, better learning.
Corwin Press.