INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Customer Profitability and Digitalization in the B2B Market:  
Systematic Literature Review  
Annisa Nur Hanifah*., Aristanti Widyaningsih., Denny Andriana  
Master of Accounting, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia  
Received: 10 November 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Published: 06 December 2025  
ABSTRAK  
This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to synthesise and analyse the roles, contributions,  
challenges, and gaps in the literature at the intersection of Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA), digitalisation,  
and the Business-to-Business (B2B) market. Using an SLR approach, this study identifies and evaluates 30  
scholarly articles that focus on CPA in B2B markets within the context of digitalization. The analysis is  
conducted thematically to identify models, non-risk challenges, and integration gaps. Digitalization has  
transformed B2B CPA from a purely historical, backward-looking model into a predictive, risk-adjusted  
approach. The use of Machine Learning (ML) and data mining techniques (such as Boosting and Random Forest)  
has proven accurate in estimating customer churn probabilities and risk levels, which are then integrated into  
Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) calculations based on Risk-Adjusted Revenue (RAR). The main non-risk  
challenges include failures in integrating legacy systems (ERP, CRM, SCM), which hinder accurate tracing of  
cost-to-serve, as well as the need for managerial cultural change and the adoption of new hybrid technology  
roles.The key gap in the literature is the lack of empirical and technical studies that explicitly explain how digital  
technology platforms (hybrid actors such as chatbots or e-marketplaces) automatically capture and allocate  
service costs to B2B customer accounts within traditional cost accounting models, particularly Activity-Based  
Costing (ABC).  
Keywords: Customer Profitability Analysis, Digitalization, B2B Market  
INTRODUCTION  
Digital transformation has radically changed the business landscape, especially within the Business-to-Business  
(B2B) market concept. In general, B2B companies are currently facing increasing pressure to optimize their  
customer relationships in response to market volatility and global competition. Data from Anan (2023) indicates  
that companies with superior customer analytics capabilities (which are often driven by digitalization) can  
achieve a profitability increase of up to 15–20% compared to their competitors. This phenomenon highlights the  
importance of Customer ProfitabilityAnalysis (CPA) with an approach that goes beyond total revenue to measure  
the costs and profitability associated with each individual customer as a key to efficient resource allocation and  
strategic decision-making in a digital environment.  
However, the implementation of CPA in the B2B context faces unique challenges compounded by digitalization.  
The B2B market is characterized by a smaller number of customers, higher transaction values, and complex,  
long-term relationships (Purmonen et al., 2023). The main challenge is the complexity in measuring  
differentiated Cost-to-Serve in the digital era. Digital infrastructure generates massive volumes of data (Big  
Data) from various touchpoints—ranging from e-procurement platforms, automated Customer Relationship  
Management (CRM), to digital technical support services (Voorhees et al., 2025). The core problem that arises  
is how to accurately integrate, process, and model this large and varied volume of data to calculate B2B customer  
profitability in real-time or near real-time.  
Several previous studies have examined CPA, focusing on traditional frameworks such as Activity-Based  
Costing (ABC) or Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) models. For example, Lau et al. (2016) reviewed the  
integration of ABC in CPA measurement, while Ruch & Sackmann (2012) explored the role of CLV in B2C.  
Page 2963  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Although these studies provide a strong foundation, a clear research gap is evident: the lack of a focused and in-  
depth synthesis on the intersection between CPA, Digitalization, and the B2B Market. The majority of existing  
research tends to be: (1) theoretical or conceptual without empirically integrating the implications of digital  
technology; (2) more focused on the B2C market where the dynamics of relationships and cost complexity differ  
; or (3) only touches upon one aspect of technology (e.g., the role of CRM) without providing a comprehensive  
overview of the overall impact of digitalization.  
Therefore, this study aims to complement the limitations of previous studies by conducting a Systematic  
Literature Review (SLR). By adopting a rigorous SLR methodology, this research will systematically identify,  
evaluate, and synthesize scholarly literature that explicitly discusses Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA) in  
the B2B market within the context of digitalization. This approach will allow for the identification of emerging  
methodological trends (e.g., the use of Machine Learning to predict B2B profitability), specific implementation  
challenges, and opportunities created by Big Data and analytics.  
This research is expected to provide significant new contributions. Theoretically, this SLR will produce a  
comprehensive conceptual framework, map the evolution of this discipline in the digital era, and explicitly  
identify future research agenda at the intersection of these three fields. Practically, the findings of this research  
will provide invaluable insights for B2B managers and executives, assisting them in designing and implementing  
CPAsystems that are more sophisticated, accurate, and relevant to a data-driven business environment. The main  
objective of this article is to provide a critical review and synthesis of scholarly literature on Customer  
Profitability Analysis in the context of the digitalization-driven B2B market, identifying the key models,  
challenges, and opportunities relevant to academics and practitioners. The practical benefit for the B2B sector is  
an improved capability in profitability-based decision-making, leading to optimized pricing, increased retention  
of valuable customers, and smarter allocation of sales and marketing resources.  
Main Research Question: What are the roles and contributions of information technology systems (e.g., CRM,  
Data Analytics) in enhancing the effectiveness of Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA) in the B2B market?  
Sub RQ 1: What are the digital technical capabilities most frequently discussed to support CPA in B2B?  
Sub RQ 2: What gaps exist in the literature regarding the integration between technology platforms and  
traditional cost accounting models (such as ABC) in B2B CPA?  
Sub RQ 3: What are the main non-risk challenges in implementing CPA in a digitalized B2B  
environment?  
Theoritical Background  
Customer Profitability Analysis (CPA) and its derivative metric, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV), are essential  
disciplines in modern management. This concept is rooted in the understanding that customers are a fundamental  
source of revenue and a vital resource for corporate profitability and performance (W. Huang et al., 2024). The  
study of customer profitability analysis (CPA) attempts to quantify the financial value of each customer or  
customer segment as a basis for allocating marketing and sales resources. Traditional approaches include ABC  
analysis (customer classification based on sales/profit contribution), customer past value (CPV), and customer  
lifetime value (CLV), which calculates the historical and prospective profit contribution of customers by  
discounting cash flows and considering purchase frequency and relationship duration (Dawson et al., 2017).  
In addition to monetary measures, modern CPA utilizes behavioral information such as recency, frequency, and  
monetary value (RFM) to assess customer "value" and perform segmentation to target marketing and service  
efforts (Ryu et al., 2025). Advanced variations of RFM add dimensions such as relationship length (LRFM),  
product category/type (RFMC/FRAT), or different service types, making them better able to capture the  
heterogeneity of profit contribution across business lines or service categories within a single B2B customer.  
Digitalization and Digital Transformation (DT) refer to the integration of digital technology that transforms how  
companies operate, compete, and create value (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014). In the B2B context, technology  
serves as a key driver of efficiency and competitive advantage. Technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI),  
Page 2964  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Machine Learning (ML), Big Data Analytics, and Cloud Computing enable companies to improve decision-  
making and streamline operations (Liu et al., 2024). Digital Transformation is considered a process driven by  
capabilities. The Dynamic Capabilities (DC) framework emphasizes the need for companies to sense market  
changes, seize innovation opportunities, and reconfigure their resources to maintain an advantage in a dynamic  
digital ecosystem (Warner & Wäger, 2019)  
The B2B market is characterized by complex relationships, high transaction values, and the importance of post-  
sales relationship management (Homburg et al., 2002). After-sales service in B2B market is a critical factor for  
customer satisfaction and retention. In the manufacturing context, organized after-sales service can turn costs  
into revenue opportunities (Voorhees et al., 2025).  
METHODOLOGY  
Over the last few years, the Systematic Literature Review has become an important research method due to its  
clear advantages over Traditional Literature Review. ASystematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research method  
for identifying, evaluating, and interpreting research results relevant to a specific topic, particular research, or  
phenomenon of concern (Kitchenham, 2004). The Systematic Literature Review is a qualitative approach that is  
descriptively qualitative of relevant research results. In conducting a systematic literature review, there are tools  
to help researchers select relevant articles such as Publish or Perish, Covidence, Zotero, and Mendeley (Watajdid  
et al., 2021). The guideline used for conducting the systematic literature review is the PRISMA (Preferred  
Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. PRISMA is a reporting guideline  
designed to improve the quality and transparency of reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA  
provides a minimum list of items that should be reported in an SLR article, helping authors provide a complete  
picture of the methods used, why the review was conducted, and what was found (Sastypratiwi & Nyoto, 2020).  
Search Phase  
In this study, we use the systematic literature review method with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for  
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The systematic review process is carried out in several  
stages:  
a. Planning: Formulating specific research questions and developing a research protocol focused on  
customer profitability analysis and digitalization in the B2B Market, and searching for gaps and  
inconsistencies from previous research..  
b. Literature search: We searched international databases using Publish or Perish. We then used several  
related terms to search for articles by including relevant keywords ("customer profitability" and  
"customer profitability analysis" and "customer life time value" and "digitalization" and "B2B Market")  
c. Study Selection: 1. Articles published in 2014-2025.  
2. Articles sourced from Google Scholar and Scopus.  
3. Credible sources from reputable and Scopus-indexed journals.  
4. Literature that does not meet these criteria or lacks empirical data is excluded from the study  
d. Quality assessment: Evaluating the methodological quality and relevance of each included study.  
e. Data extraction: Collecting relevant information from each study using a standard format.  
Selection Phase  
To filter the most relevant articles for this literature review, certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied  
to the search results. This study exclusively used articles published in scholarly journals, as they are considered  
to have validity as "certified knowledge". Therefore, other publication types such as conference papers, books,  
Page 2965  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
book chapters, or other formats were excluded from the analysis. Within these criteria, the publication timeframe  
was limited to articles published between 2014 and 2025. This time limitation was applied to ensure that only  
the most recent articles are analyzed, thereby maintaining the relevance of the concepts and theories discussed  
regarding customer profitability analysis and digitalization in the B2B market. This approach is particularly  
important given the rapid evolution of research in the fields of digitalization and customer profitability analysis,  
ensuring that the findings and recommendations remain applicable to the present time. The inclusion and  
exclusion criteria used in this systematic literature review are presented in Table 1.  
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria  
Criteria  
Inclusion  
2014-2025  
English  
Exclusion  
Publication Year  
Language  
Other than 2014-2025  
Other than english  
Subject Area  
Customer  
Profitability  
Analysis, Not  
Customer Profitability Analysis,  
Digitalization, B2B Market  
Digitalization, B2B Market  
Document Type  
Article  
Not Article  
In addition to applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, this research applied a quality assessment framework  
to ensure the relevance and credibility of the sources used. This assessment was based on three main criteria:  
Topic Relevance: The article must specifically discuss customer profitability analysis and digitalization  
in the B2B market.  
Methodological Quality: The article must use an appropriate and systematic methodological approach  
in analyzing customer profitability analysis and digitalization in the B2B market  
Comprehensive Analysis: The article must present a thorough and in-depth discussion of customer  
profitability analysis and digitalization in the B2B market.  
Data Extraction  
Figure 1. PRISMA- SLR  
Figure 1 illustrates the PRISMA flow diagram. We used the Covidence website to conduct the systematic  
literature review with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses)  
guidelines. After searching for articles through Publish or Perish, we collected an initial sample of 100 studies,  
focusing on the systematic literature review. We excluded 30 articles identified as duplicates. We excluded  
articles that were not related to customer profitability, digitalization, and the B2B market. For quality assurance  
Page 2966  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
reasons, we only referred to studies published in Scopus-indexed international journals. This resulted in the  
exclusion of 70 articles and a final sample of 30 articles.  
In conducting the article screening, the first step was a preliminary analysis. Preliminary analysis is a scan of the  
article titles and research abstracts relevant to the research to be conducted. We did not further consider articles  
with titles and abstracts that did not align with our research objectives. The next step was selecting articles by  
scanning the theories and methods used. After the article screening was complete, we categorized several articles  
based on the independent and dependent variables studied in Customer Profitability Analysis and Digitalization.  
Furthermore, the research sample used was the B2B market.  
MAIN FINDINGS  
This section organizes the study's findings thematically, following the structure proposed by Varsha P S et al.  
(2024), Votto et al. (2021), and used by Firmansyah et al. (2024). e begin by summarizing the main quantitative  
and qualitative aspects of the literature analyzed. Next, we review the relevant definitions and features of the  
field. We then examine the various modeling frameworks, as well as the areas and methods used in various  
customer profitability analysis cases. Furthermore, we discuss how digitalization, such as AI and Machine  
Learning, is utilized in prescriptive or predictive frameworks to assess customer profitability analysis. Finally,  
we conclude this section by highlighting the main contributions and limitations of this systematic literature  
review (SLR), and by defining the research agenda for this field.  
Quantitative & qualitative summary of the outputs of this study  
16  
14  
12  
10  
8
6
4
2
0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025  
Year of Publication  
Figure 2 Number of studies by year of publication.  
The SLR findings conducted in this study identified publications from 2014 to 2025, as shown in Figure 2. The  
first recognized study was conducted by Tamaddoni Jahromi et al. (2014), which discussed data mining  
techniques for modeling customer churn in the B2B context. In this year, the use of data mining to analyze  
customer profitability began to be discussed. After 2014, there were no publications published regarding  
customer profitability analysis and digitalization. However, in 2016 and 2017, one study each was identified:  
Lau et al. (2016) and Dawson et al. (2017). Then, 2 studies appeared in 2018, namely Zhang & Seetharaman  
(2018) and Jarvinen & Vaataaja (2018). Most of the research was published in journals focusing on marketing  
and management. Further studies emerged in 2020, leading to a surge in research studies in 2025. Specifically,  
26% of studies were published in marketing journals such as Industrial Marketing Management and Marketing  
Intelligence & Planning, while 16% were published in retail management publications such as the Journal of  
Retailing. The remaining papers were published in alternative venues, such as Industrial Management & Data  
System and the International Journal of Information Management.  
Page 2967  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Table 2 An overview of research methods and outputs of the different studies in the area.  
No  
Reference  
Research Method  
Output  
Years  
2014  
2016  
2017  
2018  
2018  
2020  
2021  
2021  
2022  
2022  
2023  
2024  
2024  
2024  
2024  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
LR  
E
CS/VS  
T
CM  
ER  
1
Jahromi et al  
2
Lau et al  
3
Dawson et al  
4
Qin Zhang and P.B. Seetharaman  
Janne Jarvinen and Kim Vaataaja  
Mahlamäkia et al  
5
6
7
Meyer et al  
8
Rebeloa et al  
9
Bonney et al  
10  
11  
12  
13  
14  
15  
16  
17  
18  
19  
20  
21  
22  
23  
24  
25  
Chen Lin and Douglas Bowman  
Lisa Lundin and Daniel Kindstr¨om  
Wan Huang, Yufan Bai, Hong Luo  
Taheri et al  
Firmansyah et al  
Rainer Lueg and Dima Ilieva  
Oliveira et al  
Voorhees et al  
Alnofeli et al  
Ryu et al  
Chunyu Bao, Min Li, Yiying Pei  
Cortezet al  
Shashank Vaid and Fred M. Feinberg  
Kyrdoda et al  
Almendros et al  
Qiang Wu et al  
Page 2968  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
26  
27  
28  
29  
30  
Yang Pan et al  
Yavuz et al  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
2025  
Gao et al  
Wijekoonet al  
Tzu-Lun Huang  
Table 2 displays the 30 selected papers, along with the research methodologies used and the study findings. The  
research methodologies used are Literature Review (LR), Experiment (E), and Comparative Study/Validation  
Study (CS/VS), which each produced different output categories, namely Theoretical (T), Conceptual Model  
(CM), and Empirical Result (ER). Studies were categorized as literature review (LR) if they discussed  
comprehensive concepts, advantages, disadvantages, or design principles for calculating customer value.  
Additionally, certain studies presented a conceptual model (CM) that refined the theoretical framework by  
offering a visual representation of model choices in calculating customer value with the help of digitalization  
such as data mining. Some studies also generated an empirical result (ER) through the use of calculations,  
predictions, or both to test the ability of AI-supported Customer Relationship Management to influence customer  
value. Furthermore, this research shows a post-sales relationship management model in the B2B market to  
enhance loyalty and customer value. The majority of the selected articles included a theoretical viewpoint on the  
field of customer value, digitalization, and customer loyalty.  
Studies throughout time  
The first study conducted by Tamaddoni Jahromi et al. (2014) adapted the framework proposed by Neslin et al.  
(2006) and Lemmens & Gupta (2013) to calculate and maximize the profitability of retention campaigns at the  
individual customer level in a B2B context, considering factors such as churn probability, customer value, and  
incentive cost. This article addressed a literature gap by proposing a data-mining approach to model customer  
churn in a non-contractual B2B context. Data mining, rooted in AI, is favored because churn is a rare event, and  
prediction accuracy is highly emphasized. Digitalization of customer retention profitability calculation was  
already widely researched, particularly this study used a sample of online retailer companies in Australia. This  
indicates that research in 2014 already considered the importance of digitalization for calculating customer  
retention value, especially in developed countries like Australia.  
Studies in the period 2016-2020 show the development of research in the utilization of digitalization to calculate  
customer value across several corporate sectors, such as the research conducted by Lau et al. (2016) on an airline  
company. Dawson et al. (2017) developed research with empirical result output that examined the relationship  
of performance drivers between suppliers and customers on customer value. Meanwhile, 2 studies in 2018,  
namely Zhang & Seetharaman (2018) and Jarvinen & Vaataaja (2018) , used the case study technique. The use  
of the case study technique in this year indicates an increase in research models in the field of customer  
profitability analysis. While the research by Mahlamäki et al. (2020) developed the field of customer value  
research in the form of a digitalization tool for the sales process in the B2B market to assess customer acceptance.  
The period 2021-2025 saw a surge in research with the development of more complex customer value research  
fields with new variables. Rebelo et al. (2021) added the variable of improved after-sales service to increase  
customer profitability and loyalty. Lin & Bowman (2022) linked the impact of the introduction of customer  
loyalty on customer profitability. Firmansyah et al. (2024) conducted a literature study regarding the gap in  
research related to how customer risk factors are integrated into Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) calculations in  
various industries. In 2025, there are 15 articles that have been selected in accordance with the field to be  
discussed in this study. The research methods used in these 15 articles are quite diverse, consisting of literature  
review, PLS-SEM, regression models, case study, bootstrapping analysis, and XGBoost and random forest  
algorithms. In this year, research is becoming more diverse with the fields studied and various variables such as  
the utilization of new tools or sales digitalization to enhance the sales process in the B2B market (Oliveira et al.,  
2025). Furthermore, Alnofeli et al. (2026) studied the ability of AI-assisted CRM to improve organizational  
Page 2969  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
performance. Vaid & Feinberg (2025) introduced the Digital Lead Generation Platform (DLGP), an increasingly  
popular way to enable users to explore products from various retailers that can improve customer satisfaction  
and customer value.  
Digitalization, Customer Profitability Analysis, and B2B Market  
The following is the result of the systematic literature review integration that provides information in the form  
of the research objective and research results of each article that has been selected through several selections:  
Table 3 PRISMA- SLR Result  
Research Theme  
Introducing data  
Research Result  
No Reference  
1
Tamaddoni  
mining The best performing data-mining technique (boosting)  
Jahromi et al. techniques to model customer is then applied to develop a profit maximizing  
(2014)  
churn (customers who stop) in a retention campaign. Results confirm that the model  
non-contractual B2B context driven approach to churn prediction and developing  
and developing a retention retention strategies outperforms commonly used  
campaign that maximizes profit. managerial heuristics.  
2
Lau  
(2016)  
et  
al. Developing a hybrid model to This research successfully developed a multi-criteria  
analyze integrated data to hybrid model that integrates Activity-Based Costing  
identify airline customers with and Management-based Customer Profitability  
varying profit potential for Analysis with the Relationship Marketing model using  
market segmentation.  
the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS  
methods to measure and rank the profitability of the top  
100 corporate customer accounts of an airline.  
3
4
Dawson et al. Investigating  
performance The profitability of SOE customer relationships is  
(2017)  
drivers in Chinese supplier- related to continuous personal and hierarchical  
customer relationships for two relationships, while for IJV, that profitability is related  
types of Chinese suppliers: to interactive product adaptation and production  
International Joint Ventures planning.  
(IJV)  
and  
State-Owned  
Enterprises (SOE).  
Zhang  
Seetharaman  
(2018)  
& Proposing  
profitability  
companies whose customers predicting customers’ purchases. The paper also  
have purchasing cycles demonstrates significant profit consequences to the  
a
customer The paper shows that the proposed model outperforms  
model for the benchmark model in terms of both explaining and  
determined by an intrinsic cycle firm if incorrect methods are used instead of the  
and the cumulative effect of proposed method.  
marketing demand.  
5
6
Jarvinen  
& Investigate how companies with Potential benefits for companies when modern cost  
Vaataaja (2018) different customer interfaces accounting is connected to customer-focused  
utilize time-based activity-based operations.  
costing in their customer  
profitability analysis.  
Mahlamäki et Assessing customer acceptance Enjoyment (comfort and pleasure in use) is the most  
al. (2020)  
of a digital configurator tool in significant predictor for customer adoption of  
the purchasing process.  
technology, supporting the integration of intrinsic  
motivational aspects in B2B digital tool development.  
Page 2970  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
7
8
Meyer et al. Combining customer scoring The Response Model (With Scores / WS) provides the  
(2021)  
analysis and operational route best results (highest share of realized score) if its  
planning for field sales force, to prediction accuracy is reasonable.  
identify the most effective  
combination of scoring methods  
and tour planning models.  
Rebelo et al. Development and improvement After-sales service can be a competitive advantage.  
(2021) of after-sales service processes  
to increase customer  
profitability and satisfaction in a  
Latvian  
manufacturing  
company.  
9
Bonney et al. Evaluating the implementation Digital transformation triggers business model  
(2022) of digitalization in B2B business innovation, improves customer experience, and raises  
processes,  
marketing  
particularly  
and  
in challenges related to human resources and  
sales organizational processes.  
relationships.  
10  
Lin & Bowman Investigating the impact of The introduction of loyalty programs results in an  
(2022)  
introducing customer loyalty immediate spike in sales and profit in most categories,  
programs on sales and but the effect is generally short-lived.  
profitability at the product  
category level, and the role of  
category characteristics as a  
moderator.  
11  
12  
Lundin  
Kindström  
(2023)  
& Exploring the digitalization of Digitalization of touchpoints (i.e., adding digital  
the business-to-business (B2B) touchpoints and transforming or facilitating  
customer journey, which is touchpoints), changing roles in the digitalization  
recognized as a key research journey (i.e., introducing new roles, activating  
priority, but has not received customers, and emphasizing collectivity), and  
substantial academic attention.  
digitalization of the overall process (i.e., expanding,  
enhancing, and supporting the process).  
W. Huang et al. Investigating whether insiders The profitability of insider sales is significantly greater  
(2024)  
exploit confidential customer in companies that conceal customer identity.  
information to profit from their  
stock sales, using the context of  
the Chinese market where  
customer identity disclosure is  
voluntary.  
13  
14  
Taheri et al. Determining the factors that The use of OCR results in the highest profit and  
(2024)  
influence profitability, delivery customer satisfaction level.  
time, and customer satisfaction  
in Omni-channel Retailing  
(OCR) using simulation.  
Firmansyah et Filling a gap in research related Integrating risk factors is important for increasing the  
al. (2024) to how customer risk factors are accuracy of CLV measurement and supporting  
integrated  
Lifetime  
into  
Value  
Customer customer portfolio management strategies, especially  
(CLV) in industries with high volatility.  
Page 2971  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
calculations  
industries.  
in  
various  
15  
16  
Lueg & Ilieva Investigating the interaction The sophistication of customer profitability analysis  
(2024) between strategic goals and increases with uneven customer volume, high and  
calculative  
specifically  
practices, controllable customer-specific burden, inter-customer  
Customer interaction, and service complexity.  
Profitability Analysis (CPA).  
Oliveira et al. Exploring how the adoption of The adoption of Sales Enablement Platforms (SEPs)  
(2025)  
sales enablement platforms improves efficiency, collaboration, and sales  
(SEP) influences each stage of performance.  
the business-to-business (B2B)  
sales process in medium-sized  
companies.  
17  
18  
19  
20  
Voorhees et al. Integrative literature review on B2B companies must be proactive, leverage objective  
(2025) post-sales relationship data, and balance automation with human  
management models in the B2B relationships.  
market.  
Alnofeli et al. Testing how AI-supported CRM AI-CRM capabilities positively influence Marketing  
(2026)  
capabilities  
organizational performance in improves Sustainable Profitability and Sustainable  
the banking sector. Competitive Advantage.  
influence Ambidexterity. This Marketing Ambidexterity then  
Ryu  
(2025)  
et  
et  
al. Classifying profitable customers Hotel customers tend to focus on specific divisions:  
using hotel loyalty program Rooms, Food & Beverage, or Banquet. Profitable  
data.  
clusters are divided into Rooms users, F&B users,  
Rooms and F&B users, and F&B and Banquet users.  
Bao  
(2026)  
al. Examining the impact of Spillover effects, both unilateral and bilateral, increase  
customer flow spillovers on the retailer profitability.  
short-term  
and  
long-term  
strategic decisions of duopoly  
retailers.  
21  
Mora Cortez et Observing the role of various The main changes in B2B trade shows are driven by  
al. (2025)  
actors and the changing nature three forces: cultural, commercial, and digital.  
of  
motivations  
participation/actions  
Trade  
Shows.  
The  
for  
of  
organizers, exhibitors, and  
visitors vary.  
22  
23  
Vaid  
Feinberg  
(2025)  
& Introducing the Digital Lead Marketplace management needs to pay attention to  
Generation Platform (DLGP), optimizing the number of players in each category to  
an increasingly popular way to maximize engagement and conversion rate.  
enable users to explore products  
from various retailers.  
Kyrdoda et al. Reviewing the dynamics and Digital transformation drives business model  
(2025) challenges of digital innovation, increased efficiency, and changes in the  
transformation in B2B, with the value creation process in B2B.  
yellow cluster as an exception  
Page 2972  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
that  
focuses  
more  
on  
quantitative approaches.  
24  
Clemente-  
Analyzing the direct and The total effect of digitalization on competitiveness is  
Almendros et indirect effects of digital 0.401, almost double the direct effect.  
al. (2025)  
strategic orientation on the  
performance of micro, small,  
and  
(MSMEs)  
medium  
in  
enterprises  
developing  
countries (Peru), mediated by  
innovation and environmental  
practices.  
25  
26  
Q. Wu et al. Examining the influence of the Passion For Inventing significantly influences  
(2025)  
CEO's Passion for Inventing Digitalization Capacity.  
(PFI) on the performance of  
family firms, mediated by  
digitalization capacity, and  
moderated by Socio-Emotional  
Wealth (SEW).  
Pan  
(2025)  
et  
al. Introducing a new tool to Consumers with similar preferences can have different  
analyze what customers buy and shopping frequencies, which is important for  
how often they shop.  
promotional targeting. The model can predict shopping  
behavior, segmentation, price effects, promotions, and  
optimal bundling recommendations for revenue  
enhancement.  
27  
28  
29  
Yavuz & Çalik Investigating the long-term AI/ML patents significantly increase ROA and  
(2025)  
impact of AI and Machine Operating Margin with a five-year lag.  
Learning (ML) patent intensity  
on the financial performance of  
innovation-driven companies.  
Gao  
et  
al. Investigating the impact of AI The main factors influencing user intention to continue  
(2025)  
chatbot  
problem-solving using AI chatbots: ease of use, satisfaction, and trust,  
capabilities on user intention to as well as the effectiveness of problem solving.  
continue using the service on e-  
commerce platforms.  
Wijekoon et al. Applying  
the  
strategic The  
combination  
of  
effectuation-bricolage  
(2025)  
entrepreneurship  
framework significantly increases the fit of EO-MO, which leads  
and configuration theory to to customer satisfaction and customer relationship  
investigate how the combination quality.  
of strategic behavior, decision-  
making  
logic,  
resource  
allocation mechanisms, and the  
socio-cognitive characteristics  
of leaders influence customer-  
focused performance.  
30  
T.-L.  
(2025)  
Huang Investigating the impact of Market valuation increases immediately after the  
Digital Transformation (DT) on adoption of Digital Transformation, reflecting investor  
the financial performance of confidence in the long-term strategic value of DT.  
Page 2973  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
publicly listed companies in  
China.  
The SLR study identified the existence of digitalization for calculating customer profitability analysis as  
explained in each collected article. Tamaddoni Jahromi et al. (2014) utilized advanced computational capabilities  
to process large volumes of data and identify patterns for prediction. Researchers used data mining models such  
as Boosting, Decision Tree, and Logistic Regression to calculate the churn probability for each customer  
(Coussement & De Bock, 2013). Boosting, as an ensemble learner technique, proved to be the most accurate in  
identifying true churners. The results of the data mining model (churn probability) are then integrated into a  
formula to calculate the individual profitability of targeting customers with retention incentives. This formula is  
the culmination of data-based analysis by Neslin et al. (2006) and Lemmens & Gupta (2013) where profit is  
calculated based on:  
πi = pi [γi(Vip−δi)] + (1−pi) [−φiδi]  
pi (churn probability) is derived from the data mining model (digitalization result).  
Vip (estimated revenue in the prediction period) is calculated based on (revenue generated in the  
calibration period) from transactional data.  
Vic itself is the Monetary variable from the RFM model.  
It can be noted that the churn modeling in Jahromi et al. (2014) research is predominantly in a B2C context, and  
the application of data mining techniques in B2B churn prediction is still an underdeveloped area. This shows  
the existing opportunity to introduce various data mining modeling techniques and approaches to the area of  
churn prediction in a B2B context (Wiersema, 2013). The magnitude of this opportunity becomes clearer when  
the nature of the B2B context, with large purchases and transactions, is taken into account (Rauyruen & Miller,  
2007). According to Martínez-López & Casillas (2013), the application of AI in a B2B context spans a wide  
range, from pricing strategies to communication decisions and product development. Of all the roles such  
systems can play in solving industrial marketing problems, managing customer relationships will certainly be a  
significant one. It has been well established in the marketing literature that, as a more profitable marketing  
strategy, companies should focus on building long-term relationships with their customers by adopting  
appropriate retention approaches, instead of striving to acquire new customers (Rebelo et al., 2021)  
Lau et al. (2016) investigated the calculation of digital-based CPA with Activity-Based Costing and Management  
(ABC&M). Costing information is captured in process-specific data marts, which reside under a centralized  
multi-function repository. These data marts store micro-level transactions and also cost/activity driver tables  
(Lau et al., 2016). The ABC model within the data marts is dimensioned based on the customer, product, location,  
and resource perspectives (Ruiz‐de‐Arbulo‐Lopez et al., 2013). This allows for the tracing of cross-functional  
cost and profit information specific to each customer. To address the limitations of ABC&M as a backward-  
looking approach, this article used a hybrid model involving two Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)  
techniques based on digitalization/analytics. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was used to determine  
the weights of RM criteria and sub-criteria that influence long-term customer profitability (Erensal et al., 2006).  
The form of digitalization here is by converting the linguistic assessments (subjective and vague) of an expert  
panel into triangular fuzzy numbers (TFN). This is a form of digitalization in decision-making, which handles  
uncertainty in human judgment. Then, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution  
(TOPSIS) was used to combine the FAHP weights with the decision matrix (actual customer data) to rank the  
top 100 corporate accounts based on the prospect of long-term customer profitability (Olson, 2004).  
The most sophisticated digitalization aspect in Firmansyah et al. (2024) article is the integration of customer risk  
factors into CLV calculations, which is highly relevant for the B2B market. In the B2B market, customers can  
carry significant risks (e.g., high churn probability, purchase volatility, or credit risk). Digitalization enables the  
use of AI models to predict and adjust revenue based on Risk-Adjusted Revenue (RAR) (Singh et al., 2013).  
Machine Learning models such as Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Networks, and  
Random Forest are used to predict the probability of risk occurrence, such as the likelihood of churn or default.  
Page 2974  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
In the context of Customer Portfolio Theory (CPT), Machine Learning models are used to measure customer  
purchase volatility, similar to measuring financial asset risk (Machado & Karray, 2022). All these analyses are  
made possible by centralized information systems that reflect operational digitalization. With digital models,  
managers can proactively allocate resources (e.g., retention incentives or account manager time) to maximize  
CLV (Return) by focusing on high-profitability customers, as well as minimizing risk (Volatility) by identifying  
and managing customers with unstable purchasing patterns or high churn probability.  
Digitalization drives business model innovation, increased efficiency, and changes in the value creation process  
in the B2B market (Kyrdoda et al., 2025). In their research, Kyrdoda et al. (2025) suggest that Artificial  
Intelligence (AI) technology automates routine tasks and helps simplify the customer journey and enhance value  
co-creation. This can reduce the cost-to-serve for customers. Technologies such as Big Data Analytics offer  
valuable consumer and technology market insights (M. Wu et al., 2022). Digitalization enables suppliers and  
buyers to gather and analyze market knowledge regarding products, competitors, and customer preferences.  
Accurate and rapid data allows companies to refine their strategies based on market demand, improving  
efficiency and decision-making. Through CRM systems, AI, and chatbots, suppliers can provide customized  
recommendations, quick assistance, and personalized service (Gao et al., 2025). By understanding the profiles  
of high-profit customers, companies can target the acquisition of more profitable customers.  
The Key Non-Risk Challenges in Implementing CPA in a Digitalized B2B Environment  
B2B companies often have sophisticated Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Customer Relationship  
Management (CRM), and Supply Chain Management (SCM) systems that are, however, legacy (old) systems  
(Bonney et al., 2022). These systems were not designed to seamlessly synchronize business logic and share data.  
Significant investment is needed to design new interfaces, standardize data formats, and centralize business  
policies (business logic) so that systems can interact consistently and share information smoothly (Rapp et al.,  
2017). Although transactional data is abundant, the accuracy and availability of customer data are critical  
barriers, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. Effective CPA requires detailed data regarding the  
cost-to-serve, which is often scattered across various functional systems (Lueg & Ilieva, 2024). espite large  
investments in digitalization, discrepancies often arise between the expected benefits (efficiency, innovation)  
and the actual financial results, which raises questions about how investments translate into profitability  
(Alnofeli et al., 2026)  
The implementation of digitalized CPA demands changes in managerial culture, capabilities, and focus. The  
transition to virtual (digital) operations can create business uncertainty due to a lack of clear legal and regulatory  
norms related to digital operations (Reier Forradellas & Garay Gallastegui, 2021). The success of CRM (which  
is the foundation of CPA) requires a company-wide cultural shift and cross-functional collaboration. Managers  
must have explicit guidance on the importance of various competing goals in decision-making. Despite the  
existence of human-like technologies (such as AI/chatbots), the human factorespecially competence and  
behavioral attributes such as knowledge, skills, and attituderemains essential for implementing digital formats  
and influencing value-related processes (Gao et al., 2025). Digital transformation introduces hybrid roles (e.g.,  
digital platforms acting as both actors and resources) that blur traditional boundaries in business models.  
Managing the dynamics and tensions arising from these dual roles requires a new managerial approach (Mora  
Cortez et al., 2025). Most research tends to focus on specific digital technologies and lacks comprehensive  
longitudinal studies, making it difficult to record progress and transformational impacts over time.  
The Gaps Exist in The Literature  
Based on the results of the collected studies discussing customer profitability analysis, digitalization, and the  
B2B market, the literature tends to focus separately on the domain of digital technology or accounting models,  
rather than on the integration of the two for B2B CPA. Most reviews center on discrete digital technologies (such  
as Industry 4.0, social media, or AI) and their implications for B2B marketing, sales, or servitization activities.  
A gap exists in how these platforms systematically collect and stream the data needed by the ABC cost structure.  
Other research focuses on predictive models (such as AI/ML to project CLV and risk) that require cost data to  
calculate profitability. However, there is a lack of empirical studies that explicitly define and practice how the  
output of digital platforms technically triggers these risk-based CPA calculations. Short-term profitability  
Page 2975  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
models like ABC&M are recognized as backward-looking (Tamaddoni Jahromi et al., 2014) Although there are  
hybrid models (such as FAHP-TOPSIS) that attempt to integrate cost data (ABC&M) with long-term relationship  
criteria, this integration is still driven by expert assessment (subjective/qualitative) and is not fully automated  
from digital platforms.  
The B2B model is based on the Actor-Resource-Activity (A-R-A) network (Mahlamäki et al., 2020). Digital  
transformation changes activities from transactional to relational and value-driven, and transforms resources  
from passive to dynamic (Bonney et al., 2022). The gap arises because traditional ABC models view activities  
and resources statically, making it difficult to capture the dynamic value and relational costs generated by  
interactions on digital platforms. The ABC&M model requires accurate tracing of costs to activities (cost  
drivers). The research gap lies in how digital platforms (hybrid actors) such as chatbots or e-marketplaces used  
by B2B customers automatically calculate and allocate very specific and varying costs (costs to serve) to  
customer accounts. The majority of research on B2B digital transformation is qualitative. While qualitative  
approaches can understand the intricacies and complexity of transformation, the implementation of CPA and the  
integration of digital systems require strict quantitative methodology and data-based case studies to validate the  
efficiency of technology platform and accounting model integration. A significant gap is the lack of longitudinal  
studies that can record the development of platform and ABC/CPA integration over time, which is crucial given  
the continuous nature of digital transformation.  
Academic and practical contributions  
This systematic literature review research has compiled 30 articles with the theme of customer profitability  
analysis, digitalization, and the B2B market. This collection of articles has provided the view that technological  
sophistication such as data mining, AI, and machine learning is capable of calculating customer value in various  
corporate sectors. The literature shows that although Machine Learning has proven accurate (e.g., Boosting in  
churn prediction), its application in the context of churn and CLV prediction in the B2B market is still  
underdeveloped. This marks a great opportunity to test various data mining and AI techniques in B2B  
environments characterized by large purchases and complex transactions. Furthermore, this research highlights  
that traditional cost accounting models such as ABC&M are backward-looking, thereby limiting managers'  
ability to formulate long-term CPA strategies. It was found that hybrid models that combine quantitative methods  
with qualitative assessment (e.g., FAHP-TOPSIS) are a solution to integrate cost data with long-term relationship  
criteria assessed by experts, indicating the need for more sophisticated methodology.  
There is a strong academic emphasis on incorporating risk factors (such as revenue volatility and beta risk) into  
CLV/CPA calculations. This encourages the development of a theoretical framework for managing customers  
like a portfolio of financial investments (Customer Portfolio Theory). The research on CLV and risk-adjusted  
revenue shows that financial portfolio approaches, mean-variance, and various machine learning techniques  
(Boosting, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, SVM, Neural Network, Random Forest) are well-established for  
predicting churn and risk, and then incorporating those probabilities into the per-customer profitability formula.  
Firmansyah et al. explicitly show that almost all risk-adjusted CLV models assume the availability of cost data,  
but the literature is very minimal in technically explaining how those costs are derived from digital systems  
(ERP/CRM/SCM/platforms) for CPA purposes.  
In addition, most of the literature revolves around strengthening retention strategies as a more profitable  
marketing strategy and the role of intelligent systems in managing customer relationships. B2B Digital  
Transformation: A broader review highlights that digital transformation drives business model innovation and  
changes in the value creation process, with AI (such as chatbots and Big Data Analytics) playing a central role  
in automation and enhanced value co-creation. The dominance of qualitative approaches in B2B digital  
transformation studies indicates the need for strict quantitative methodology and data-based case studies to  
empirically validate the efficiency of technology platform and accounting model integration. An explicit gap is  
identified in the literature regarding how digital technology platforms (hybrid actors) automatically collect and  
allocate specific costs (costs to serve) to B2B customer accounts.  
Page 2976  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
Limitation of This Research  
This study faces major limitations. First, the scope of this systematic literature review (SLR) is limited by the  
selection of keywords and research databases used. The article selection process limited the type of publication  
to only scholarly journal articles (not conference papers, books, book chapters, or other formats) to ensure  
validity as "certified knowledge". While this improves quality, it may exclude important insights scattered in  
other sources. Although careful evaluation of these search parameters was conducted to ensure a comprehensive  
review of the topic, some relevant studies might have been excluded. This limitation suggests that future research  
may expand the search criteria to include more databases and keywords, potentially uncovering other relevant  
research.  
Second, the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the review were narrowly defined, focusing only on specific types  
of articles. Only English-language, Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2014 and 2025 were  
included, thus excluding relevant studies in other languages, periods before 2014, conference papers, books, or  
industry reports. Consequently, general articles discussing the area of interest but not specifically concentrating  
on the field were excluded, which may lead to the loss of important insights.  
CONCLUSION  
This SLR indicates a clear shift in B2B CPA from historical, transaction-based analysis toward predictive and  
risk-adjusted analysis driven by digitalization. Digitalization drives predictive and risk models, including the  
application of ai and machine learning for prediction. Digitalization provides large volumes of data (Big Data)  
that enable the use of Machine Learning (ML) and Data Mining (such as Boosting and Random Forest) to  
calculate churn probability and customer-specific risk (e.g., purchase volatility and beta risk). I/ML Models  
integrate these risk factors into Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) calculations to generate Risk-Adjusted Revenue  
(RAR), enabling B2B managers to allocate resources (e.g., retention incentives or account manager time) to  
maximize Return (CLV) while minimizing Risk (volatility).  
Traditional cost accounting models, such as Activity-Based Costing and Management (ABC&M), are backward-  
looking and only effective for measuring short-term profitability. To address this limitation, hybrid models (e.g.,  
FAHP-TOPSIS) are used to combine ABC&M results with qualitative assessments (through fuzzy numbers from  
an expert panel) regarding long-term relationship factors, indicating that B2B profitability is not yet fully  
automated but requires human judgment.  
The successful implementation of digitalized CPA is hampered by significant non-risk challenges, including the  
integration gap of legacy systems. Old ERP, CRM, and SCM systems in B2B often fail to synchronize cost-to-  
serve data, hindering accurate cost tracing for CPA. There is a fundamental academic gap regarding how digital  
platforms (hybrid actors such as chatbots or e-marketplaces) systematically and automatically calculate and  
allocate service costs generated by digital interactions into the ABC cost structure. Overall, this research  
concludes that although digitalization offers powerful predictive tools (AI/ML) for managing B2B profitability  
and risk, companies still struggle with the technical integration of cost data and managerial adoption challenges  
to achieve fully automated and holistic CPA.  
REFERENCES  
1. Alnofeli, K. K., Akter, S., Yanamandram, V., & Hani, U. (2026). AI-powered CRM capability  
model: Advancing marketing ambidexterity, profitability and competitive performance.  
International  
2. Anan, L. (2023, October). Fintechs: A new paradigm of growth . Mckinsey & Company.  
Journal  
of  
Information  
Management,  
86,  
102981.  
3. Bao, C., Li, M., & Pei, Y. (2026). Customer flow spillovers in retailers’ short- and long-term  
decisions: Profitability and dynamic mechanisms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88,  
4. Bonney, L., Beeler, L. L., Johnson, R. W., & Hochstein, B. (2022). The salesperson as a knowledge  
broker: The effect of sales influence tactics on customer learning, purchase decision, and  
Page 2977  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
profitability.  
Industrial  
Marketing  
Management,  
104,  
352–365.  
5. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in  
a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.  
6. Clemente-Almendros, J. A., Pelaez, A. D., Quispe, G. C., & Velarde Molina, J. F. (2025). Emerging  
countries could be different for MSMES: Digitalization and the mediation effects of innovation  
confronted to environmental practices. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 9(4), 354–365.  
7. Coussement, K., & De Bock, K. W. (2013). Customer churn prediction in the online gambling  
industry: The beneficial effect of ensemble learning. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1629–  
8. Dawson, B., Young, L., Murray, J. M., & Wilkinson, I. (2017). Drivers of supplier-customer  
relationship profitability in China: Assessing International Joint Ventures versus State Owned  
Enterprises.  
Industrial  
Marketing  
Management,  
66,  
29–41.  
9. Erensal, Y., Oncan, T., & Demircan, M. (2006). Determining key capabilities in technology  
management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Turkey . Information Sciences,  
18(176), 2755–2770.  
10. Firmansyah, E. B., Machado, M. R., & Moreira, J. L. R. (2024). How can Artificial Intelligence (AI)  
be used to manage Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)—A systematic literature review. International  
Journal  
of  
Information  
Management  
Data  
Insights,  
4(2),  
100279.  
11. Gao, J., Opute, A. P., Jawad, C., & Zhan, M. (2025). The influence of artificial intelligence chatbot  
problem solving on customers’ continued usage intention in e-commerce platforms: an expectation-  
confirmation model approach.  
Journal of Business Research, 200, 115661.  
12. Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jensen, O., Johann, C., Loewner, J., Model, A., & Prauschke, C.  
(2002). A Configurational Perspective on Key Account Management. , . Journal of Marketing, 66,  
38–60.  
13. Huang, T.-L. (2025). Digital transformation and business performance in China. Asia Pacific  
14. Huang, W., Bai, Y., & Luo, H. (2024). Customer identity concealing and insider selling profitability:  
Evidence  
from  
China.  
Journal  
of  
Corporate  
Finance,  
85,  
102566.  
15. Jarvinen, J., & Vaataaja, K. (2018). Customer Profitability Analysis Using Time-Driven Activity-  
Based Costing. Three Interventionist Case Studies. The Nordic Journal of Business, Forthcoming.  
16. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (Vol. 33). Keele University.  
17. Kyrdoda, Y., Marzi, G., & Vianelli, D. (2025). Digital transformation in the B2B context: A review,  
theorisation and future perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 129, 182–196.  
18. Lau, H., Nakandala, D., Samaranayake, P., & Shum, P. (2016). A hybrid multi-criteria decision  
model for supporting customer-focused profitability analysis. Industrial Management & Data  
19. Lemmens, A., & Gupta, S. (2013). Managing churn to maximize profits.  
20. Lin, C., & Bowman, D. (2022). The impact of introducing a customer loyalty program on category  
sales and profitability. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102769.  
21. Liu, Y. (David), Sun, J., Zhang, Z. (Justin), Wu, M., Sima, H., & Ooi, Y. M. (2024). How AI Impacts  
Companies’ Dynamic Capabilities. Research-Technology Management, 67(3), 64–76.  
22. Lueg, R., & Ilieva, D. (2024). Customer Profitability Analysis in decision-making–The roles of  
customer characteristics, cost structures, and strategizing. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0296974.  
Page 2978  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
23. Lundin, L., & Kindström, D. (2023). Digitalizing customer journeys in B2B markets. Journal of  
24. Machado, M. R., & Karray, S. (2022). Integrating Customer Portfolio Theory and the Multiple  
Sources of Risk Approaches to Model Risk-Adjusted Revenue. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(16), 356–  
25. Mahlamäki, T., Storbacka, K., Pylkkönen, S., & Ojala, M. (2020). Adoption of digital sales force  
automation tools in supply chain: Customers’ acceptance of sales configurators. Industrial  
26. Martínez-López, F. J., & Casillas, J. (2013). Artificial intelligence-based systems applied in  
industrial marketing: An historical overview, current and future insights. Industrial Marketing  
27. Meyer, A., Glock, K., & Radaschewski, F. (2021). Planning profitable tours for field sales forces: A  
unified view on sales analytics and mathematical optimization. Omega, 105, 102518.  
28. Mora Cortez, R., Clarke, A. H., & Freytag, P. V. (2025). The future of B2B trade shows: Drivers of  
transformation from a process view. Industrial Marketing Management, 129, 151–165.  
29. Neslin, S. A., Gupta, S., Kamakura, W., Lu, J., & Mason, C. H. (2006). Defection Detection:  
Measuring and Understanding the Predictive Accuracy of Customer Churn Models. Journal of  
30. Oliveira, F., Belitski, M., & Perez-Vega, R. (2025). Sales digitization and sales process optimisation  
for firm performance: Evidence from European firms. Technological Forecasting and Social  
31. Olson, D. (2004). Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer  
Modelling, 40, 721–727.  
32. Pan, Y., Russell, G., Gruca, T. S., & Li, C. (2025). Multicategory purchase behavior: basket choice,  
shopping  
33. Purmonen, A., Jaakkola, E., & Terho, H. (2023). B2B customer journeys: Conceptualization and an  
integrative framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 113, 74–87.  
frequency,  
and  
promotional  
analysis.  
Journal  
of  
Retailing.  
34. Rapp, A. A., Bachrach, D. G., Flaherty, K. E., Hughes, D. E., Sharma, A., & Voorhees, C. M. (2017).  
The Role of the Sales-Service Interface and Ambidexterity in the Evolving Organization. Journal of  
35. Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty.  
36. Rebelo, C. G. S., Pereira, M. T., Silva, J. F. G., Ferreira, L. P., Sá, J. C., & Mota, A. M. (2021). After  
sales service: key settings for improving profitability and customer satisfaction. Procedia  
37. Reier Forradellas, R. F., & Garay Gallastegui, L. M. (2021). Digital Transformation and Artificial  
Intelligence Applied to Business: Legal Regulations, Economic Impact and Perspective. Laws,  
38. Ruch, M., & Sackmann, S. (2012). Integrating management of customer value and risk in e-  
commerce. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 10(1), 101–116.  
39. Ruiz‐de‐Arbulo‐Lopez, P., Fortuny‐Santos, J., & Cuatrecasas‐Arbós, L. (2013). Lean  
manufacturing: costing the value stream. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(5), 647–668.  
40. Ryu, D. Y., Ko, Y. K., & Ko, Y. D. (2025). RFM analysis for profiling profitable customers based  
on characteristics of the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 129,  
41. Sastypratiwi, H., & Nyoto, R. (2020). Analisis Data Artikel Sistem Pakar Menggunakan Metode  
Systematic Review. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN), 6, 250–257.  
Page 2979  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue XI November 2025  
42. Singh, S., Murthi, B. P. S., & Steffes, E. (2013). Developing a measure of risk adjusted revenue  
(RAR) in credit cards market: Implications for customer relationship management. European  
43. Taheri, S. G., Navabakhsh, M., Tohidi, H., & Mohammaditabar, D. (2024). A system dynamics  
model for optimum time, profitability, and customer satisfaction in omni-channel retailing. Journal  
44. Tamaddoni Jahromi, A., Stakhovych, S., & Ewing, M. (2014). Managing B2B customer churn,  
retention and profitability. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(7), 1258–1268.  
45. Vaid, S., & Feinberg, F. M. (2025). Digital lead generation platforms: Rightsizing the seller base.  
46. Varsha P S, Chakraborty, A., & Kar, A. K. (2024). How to Undertake an Impactful Literature  
Review: Understanding Review Approaches and Guidelines for High-impact Systematic Literature  
Reviews. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 13(1), 18–35.  
47. Voorhees, C. M., Boylan, N. M., Bauer, C., Fombelle, P. W., & Jenkins, M. R. (2025).  
Conceptualizing post-sales relationship management in B2B markets: review, synthesis, and  
recommendations for future research. Journal of Business Research, 201, 115700.  
48. Votto, A. M., Valecha, R., Najafirad, P., & Rao, H. R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Tactical  
Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of  
49. Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An  
ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349.  
50. Watajdid, N. I., Lathifah, A., Andini, D. S., & Fitroh, F. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Peran  
Media Sosial Instagram Terhadap Perkembangan Digital Marketing. Jurnal Sains Pemasaran  
Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Marketing Science). Urnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia (Indonesian  
Journal of Marketing Science), 20(2), 163–179.  
51. Wiersema, F. (2013). The B2B Agenda: The current state of B2B marketing and a look ahead.  
Industrial  
Marketing  
Management,  
42(4),  
470–488.  
52. Wijekoon, S., Vesal, M., & O’Cass, A. (2025). A configurational approach to strategic  
entrepreneurship: Unlocking customer success in new ventures in emerging economies. Journal of  
53. Wu, M., Liu, Y., Chung, H. F. L., & Guo, S. (2022). When and how mobile payment platform  
complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and  
modularization  
analysis.  
Journal  
of  
Business  
Research,  
139,  
843–854.  
54. Wu, Q., Khattak, M. S., Anwar, M., Hani, I. B., & Hujran, O. (2025). CEO passion, digitalization,  
and family firm performance: Asocio-emotional wealth perspective. Digital Business, 5(2), 100144.  
55. Yavuz, M. S., & Çalik, H. (2025). AI and ML patent intensity and firm performance: A machine  
learning-based lagged analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics,  
56. Zhang, Q., & Seetharaman, P. B. (2018). Assessing lifetime profitability of customers with  
purchasing  
cycles.  
Marketing  
Intelligence  
&
Planning,  
36(2),  
276–289.  
Page 2980