INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3190
www.rsisinternational.org
Networking and Support Services (Incubators and Accelerators) as
Drivers of SMEs’ Business Performance: Conceptual Framework for
SMEs in Malaysia.
Zarith Delaila Abd Aziz
*
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000257
Received: 29 September 2025; Accepted: 14 October 2025; Published: 10 November 2025
ABSTRACT
SMEs continue to serve as a cornerstone of economic development and growth across nations. Their success is
closely linked to the effectiveness of networking activities and support services (incubator and accelerator). A
conceptual framework and proposed methodology will be presented in this paper to access the impact of
networking and support services (incubator and accelerator) on the business performance among SMEs in
Selangor, Malaysia. The proposed conceptual research offers valuable guidance for scholars seeking to evaluate
the influence of networking and support service mechanisms on SME outcomes, also providing critical insights
in designing targeted initiatives that foster SME growth and sustainability particularly for stakeholders and
policymakers.
INTRODUCTION
Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) contribute significantly to economy, employment opportunities and
foster innovation (OECD, 2024). In Malaysia for instance, SMEs contributing RM652.4 billion (39.5%) to
Malaysian GDP and accounting 97% of businesses in 2024 (The Star, 2025). Malaysian government
acknowledge the importance of SMEs as the backbone in achieving sustainable economic performance hence
introducing various strategies to boost the growth and development of SMEs (Lynette.L, Mazlina. A.R., Syed.
M. B., Uswatun. H. Z., Norshahida. C.B, Norizah.Z & Muhammad. B.B., 2024). Malaysia announced the
Malaysian Eleventh Masterplan (2016-2020) and launched strategic initiatives that positively impact the SME
productivity. In addition, in 2025, government of Malaysia allocated RM 40 billion as loan facilities and business
financing guarantees programs to support SMEs under Government agencies such as TEKUN, BSN, Bank
Pembangunan Malaysia berhad, SJPP and Malaysian Co-operative Societies Commission (Budget 2025, 2025).
The role of government in enhancing economic sustainability and survival of SMEs gained significant attention
from policymakers and researchers (Yang. M, Jaafar.N, Mamun, A., Salameh. A., & Nawi. N. (2022). Nakku,
V. B., Agbola, F. W., Miles, M. P., & Mahmood, A. (2020), stated that government supports able to overcome
main obstacles of SMEs and improve business performance through financial and non- financial assistance.
Despite the benefit contributed by the government, various studies have presented government support services
to have a mixed impact on the performance of SMEs (Sohns.F and Wojcik.D, 2020, Hassan, H., Ying, Q.,
Ahmad, H., & Ilyas, S.,2019; Jeong, H, Shin, K Kim, S and Kim, E., 2021). The effectiveness of government
supports in enhancing business performance is ununiform; some services significantly contribute to positive
outcomes while others prove less effective. This indicates that the overall success of government support is
closely tied to the nature of the service being offered (Yusoff, M.N.H, Merican, R.M.A.R, Zainudin, S.A, Nasir,
N.A, Abdullah, T. & Said, N.M, 2022).
Further, networking and engagement lead to enhancement of SMEs performance particularly in innovation and
business growth (Tran, H.T.T & Tron, V.N. 2023). Networking is a crucial element for enhancing
competitiveness among SMEs. Effective networking and collaboration can lead to better resource utilization and
innovation practices, ultimately improving business performance (Yunus, E.N. & Ernawati, E., 2025) and thus
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3191
www.rsisinternational.org
providing access to a new market (Mikhailitchenko, A., 2021). Various aspects of business performance such as
financial and non- financial performance, business growth and competitive performance substantially affected
by network competency. For instance, cultural factors may influence the effectiveness of networking activities
thus affecting the business performance (Tehseen, S., Qureshi, Z.H., & Ramayah, T., 2018). SMEs require to
strategically valuing their networks by balancing the importance and maintaining the networking. Overvaluing
networks may negatively impact the business performance (Mlotshwa, S.H. & Msimango-Galawe, J., 2020).
Other studies have highlighted the positive impact of networking on sustainable business performance such as
study done by Adeel. T., Muhammad. S.U.K.S., Marina. D., Muhammad. M. R., & Marko. T., (2024); de
Almeida, J.M.G., Gohr, C.F., Morioka, S.N. & da Nobrega, B.M (2021) & Ben A. & Chen. H., (2020).
In this light, aims of this study to identify the impact of networking and support services activities (incubator
and accelerator) on the business performance of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia. Empirical evidence suggests that
support services (incubators, accelerators) play a critical role in SMEs business performance (Ahmad,
M.F.,2024. Almeida, R. I. da S., Pinto, A. P. S., & Henriques, C. M. R., (2021) suggests a significant role of
incubator on SMEs performance in early years. Incubated businesses show positive performance as compared
to non- incubated companies. Additionally, essential supports generated through incubators increase the survival
rate of SMEs (Bandera & Thomas, 2018).
LITERATURE REVIEW
SMEs in Malaysia encounter various limitation in running and maintaining their businesses. One of the struggles
is limited access to external financial due to strict procedures and requirements imposed by financial institution
and government agencies (Abd Rashid, et.al.,2021). In addition, SME also face issues on managerial capabilities,
experience and burdened with regulatory environment due to lack of guidance and tools to meet the standards
efficiently (Lim, S.-Y. & Bakar, S.A., 2018). Consequently, various initiatives have been introduced by
government to address the challenges including medium for networking and collaboration and provide support
services such as incubators and accelerators.
Government provides various support services such as financial assistance (Islamic crowdfunding), training and
development (smart entrepreneurship training framework), and sustainable practices for sustainability to support
the growth and development of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia. SMEs able to access for Islamic crowdfunding as
source of financing. Research done by Abd Rashid, N., Hasim, N., & Zainal Abidin, M. (2021) shows that
Islamic crowdfunding able to enhance the SMEs’ sustainability and development in Malaysia. Furthermore,
SMEs in Selangor has an opportunity to access knowledge when the study conducted by Rozmi, A.N.A.,
Nohuddin, P.P., Hadi, A.R.A., & Bakar, M.I.A (2021) introduced a comprehensive training to assist SMEs that
include overall operation of the business training.
Malaysia government agencies such as the Institute of National Entrepreneurship (INSKEN) has introduced a
wide range of initiatives, programs, training sessions, advisory services, and support mechanisms aimed at
realizing Malaysia’s vision of becoming an entrepreneurial nation by 2030. Programs organized by SME
Corporation such as SME Venture Asean 2025 and SMEs Go Global serve as a platform to engage with business
communities and potential investors (SME Corporation, 2025). These initiatives allow SMEs to showcase their
products and services, transfer knowledge, and explore new linkages and investment. Additionally, Smart
Selangor SME platform introduced by Selangor state government offers further support services such as training,
sharing knowledge, financial assistance, digital incentives and explore business networking particularly focus to
assists SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia (Smart Selangor, 2025). Recent empirical study such as Stephan, G. Natasha.
E., Anh T.N., & Fabian, J. F., (2020) establish that SMEs able to develop networking via trade show and acquire
valuable resources for their businesses.
Incubator And Accelerator and SME Business Performance.
Incubator and accelerator is one of the mechanism in connecting entrepreneurs with industry experts, enable
resource exchange and thus offer guidance and support for SMEs (Cearra, J., Saiz-Santos, M. & Barrutia, J.,
2021). Incubator has been identified as property- based organization that creating supportive environment to
foster the development of SMEs (C.L.N.Nixon & D.Valliere,. 2021) by offering a pool of resources, provides
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3192
www.rsisinternational.org
platforms for transfer knowledge and connecting SMEs with external business community for a flexible period
(Del Sarto, N., Isabelle, D. A., & Di Minin, A., 2020; Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E.,
2021). Moreover, incubator is an important elements of the innovation process needed by SME to secure their
competitive advantage (Wang, Z., He, Q., Xia, S., Sarpong, D., Xiong, A., & Maas, G., 2020) as well as
providing help for internalization of SMEs in the global market (Pinto. J.C., & Rua, O. L., 2023). Hence,
incubators confirm positively contribute on the development of SMEs particularly in knowledge transfer that
could assists SMEs to overcome main challenges such as financial access (Paola.P & Giuseppe.M., 2021). In
contrast, accelerator is a new generation of incubators that differ from incubators in term of key characteristics
such as duration of program, intensity of training, equity investment, and financial assistance (Moritz. A.,
Tamara.N., & Eva.L., 2020). Accelerator offer short term and fixed based program for new ventures,
mentorships, and educational composition (Cohen et. al., 2019). Accelerator drives SMEs foster innovation and
business development (Sarto et al., 2022), enhance visibility to gain supports for investment opportunities and
gaining structured learning and mentorship (Klerk S.D., Miles.M.P.,& Bliemel. M., 2024).
SMEs may leverage knowledge to create new opportunities, minimize challenges in early start-up as well as
cultivating innovation, create employment opportunities and accelerate the SMEs competencies (Al- Baimani.
N, Clifton.N , Jones. E, Pugh. R., 2021; Sarto, N. D., Cazares, C. C., & Minin, A. D., 2022; A. M. Tabas, J. M.
Kansheba & C. Theodoraki,. 2024). Prior study done in South Africa, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary and
Slovakia have shown incubators and accelerators contributes significantly on the performance and increase the
sustainability of SMEs (Kanayo. K. O., Maria. E , and Ebenezer O., 2023; Siwiec, 2023). In Malaysia for
instance, SMEs able to enhance business capabilities thus grow businesses resulting from the impact of
incubators and accelerators. Study by Ahmad, M.F., (2024) confirm a positive correlation between incubators
utilization and SMEs business growth of Malaysian’s SMEs. In Malaysian context, the Ministry of Science,
Technology, and Innovation (MOSTI) offers a comprehensive accelerator programs to support SMEs
development (MaGIC, 2023). Selangor Information Technology & Digital Economy Corporation (Sidec), one
of the Selangor government agencies provides essential supports to start-ups, provides mentoring, training, and
connects entrepreneurs to a network until they achieve independence (Sidec, 2023). Thus, this study proposes
the following hypothesis for the study of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
Hypothesis 2 (H2): Support services (incubator and accelerator) has a positive effect on the SMEs business
performance.
Networking and Engagement and SME business performance
Networking defines as a process of nurturing and building connections with individuals or organizations for the
purpose of sharing information, resources, and mutual support (Gilmore, A., 2020). In the context of SMEs,
networking acts as a crucial mechanism that enables firms to acquire external resources to enhance their
competitive advantage as well as mitigate internal limitations particularly on resource constraints (Gilmore, A.,
2020; Shahid.G., Tim. M., & Geoffrey. N.S., 2023). Networking has been classified into financial, business and
political (Liao, S., Fei, W. & Chen, C. 2007; Xu, Y., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E. & Gonzalez-Garcia, J., 2015).
According to Su, Z., Xie, E. & Wang, D., (2015); Muhammad. A., Atiq. U.R., & Syed. Z.A.S., (2018), financial
networking define as forming relationship with financial agencies and bank institution to gain access to financial
assistance and support. Business networking is about build connections with other business entities and
industries to explore opportunities and sharing knowledge. Meanwhile, political networking means building ties
with government and political bodies aims at influencing policy and gaining support.
Networking substantially benefiting SMEs by enhancing the economic performance (Milovanovic, B.M, Krzelj,
C.Z & Bubas, Z. 2022), commercialization performance (Maghsoudi-Ganjeh, Y., Khani, N., Alem-Tabriz.,
2021; Ganjeh, Y.M., Khani, N. & Tabriz, A.A., 2020) and fostering innovation of businesses (Eggers, F.,
Niemand, T., Filser, M., Kraus, S., Berchtold, J., 2020; Zhang, S., Zhang, N., Zhu, S. Liu, F., 2020). In addition,
networking offers connection platforms and assists resource exchange that could lead to organization success
(Eiriz, 2020; Shahid.G et.al. 2023). In the context of Indonesia, Indarwati, T. A., Andjarwati, A.L., Dhenabayu,
R., & Sanaji., (2024) highlighted the important role of networking on business performance. Evidence
specifically shows how networking facilitate resource exchange, reduce transaction costs and strengthens supply
chain reliability collectively contribute to enhance business performance.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3193
www.rsisinternational.org
Study done by Cisi, M., Devicienti, F., Manello, A., & Vannoni, D., (2020) shows formal networking positively
affect a gross margin ratio and exports for SMEs thus enhancing business performance. Similarly, study
conducted by Bojan. M. M., Zorica. K.C., & Zoran. B., (2022) revealed that networking positively affects the
financial performance of SMEs. SMEs in service sector may gain competitive advantage resulting from
embracing networking. It can summarize that networking directly contributes to enhance financial outcomes for
companies. Networking also contributes to non-financial performance. Study done by John, E. (2024) fill the
gap that networking contributes to SME non- financial performance particularly in the view of customer
perspective, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Further, the level of involvement in
networking activities and maintaining the relationship also affect the business performance. Mlotshwa, S.H., et
al,. (2020) posited SMEs achieve the greatest business performance when actively involved in networking
activities. Maghsoudi-Ganjeh, Y., et. al., (2021), found solid network structure particularly involving impression
management and network learning as networking capabilities dimensions improve commercialization
performance. In business, innovation success is one of the crucial element for SMEs to success. Thus, innovation
success directly associated with the success of networking activities. According to Eggers, F., et al., (2020),
SMEs involves with either high and low intensity networking drive to innovation success and SMEs with
moderate levels of intra and inter community collaboration gain the greatest innovative performance (Zhang, S.,
et al., 2020). Business performance also react positively as collaborative networks boost innovation capability
and firm’s competitive advantage (Mulyana, M., & Wasitowati. W., 2021).
In other aspect, networking also had a strong influence on supply chain performance (Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.,
Afum, E., Baah, C., & Essel, D., 2022) and gain opportunities to embark on international market (Masoud.K,
Ben, W. & Lisa. M., 2023; Di Gregorio, Musteen, & Thomas, 2021). This evidence reinforce the importance of
networking as one of the elements for SMEs sustain the market. However, as noted by to Cisi, M., Devicienti,
F., Manello, A., & Vannoni, D., (2020), mentioned, internal factors (firm size) and external factors (market
conditions, geographical location) affect the extent to which networking influences SMEs performance
differently. Therefore, this study proposed the hypothesis to examine the impact of networking on business
performance among SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
H1: Networking has a significant positive effect on business performance among SMEs in Selangor.
Integrating the proposed hypothesis, this study developed the following conceptual framework for further
analysis.
H1
H2
Figure 1: Conceptual model: the impact of Networking, and support services (incubators and accelerators) on
Business Performance of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
Networking
Support Services
Business Performance
Independent Variables
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3194
www.rsisinternational.org
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sample and Data Collection
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of support services (incubator and accelerator) and networking on
business performance of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia. Selangor will be selected as an area of study as Selangor
has contributed 25.9% to National GDP in 2023 (DOSM, 2023). This study will focusing on service sectors as
service sectors that including wholesale and retail trade, food and beverages, accommodation and transportation
position the most dominant sector due to its projected contribution of 84.7% to SMEs’ GD. Therefore, it is
crucial to understand the impact of support services (incubators and accelerators) and networking on SMEs
performance in Selangor, Malaysia. As the primary goal of this study is to access the impact of support services
as well as network on the business performance, a quantitative analysis approach will be used as this approach
is suitable for assessing causal relationship particularly on SMEs. Target population of this study is SME in
Selangor, Malaysia. The method of stratified random sampling will be employed, and survey will be conducted
among service firms in Selangor, Malaysia. The sampling frameworks may consists of the owner or the top
manager of the company (SMEs) to ensure the data accurately reflects the views of those directly involved in
businesses. Both primary and secondary data will be collected and pilot testing will be conducted among small
sample of SMEs to test the reliability and validity of the instruments.
Construct Measurement
Items and the scales will be inspired by the pervious study. Business performance will be based on Santos &
Brito (2012) meanwhile networking will apply scale modified from Curran & Blackburn, 2001; Grant & Perren,
2002; Ahl, 2003; Lewis et al., 2007) in order to capture deep understanding on the impact of networking. Finally,
to measure support services, items introduced by Shamsuddin (2014) will be used. Table 2 shows a summary of
source of variables.
Data Analysis
The study will start with data screening and descriptive analysis. Data screening will identify and correct errors,
check for missing values and assess the distributions of variables (networking, support services and business
performance). Next, descriptive statistics will be applied to present the mean characteristics of the sample and
to describe dependent (business performance) and independent variables (networking and support services) of
the study. This step will facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the sample (SMEs) on their demographics
and profile, the extent of their networking activities, the support services they engage with and their overall
performance level. Further, reliability and validity analysis will be performed. As the data will be collected
through questionnaire, Cronbach's Alpha will be to ensure the internal consistency of the scales. Meanwhile
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) will be conducted to confirm that
the questionnaire items effectively capture the distinct constructs of networking, service support
(incubator/accelerator), and SME business performance, in alignment with the theoretical framework
underpinning the study. To examine the preliminary relationships between networking and service supports
(independent variables) and SMEs business performance (dependant variables), Pearson Correlation will take
place. Lastly, all hypothesis will be tested using multiple regression analysis and factor analysis will be
conducted to identified the most important factor that significantly influence business performance among SMEs
in Selangor, Malaysia. Hence, findings of this study will provide a comprehensive understanding of how
networking and support services give impact to the performance of SMEs in Selangor, Malaysia.
Variables
Items
Sources
Networking
Network Effectiveness
Network Efficiency
Network Transparency
Return on collaboration
Koendjbiharie, S., et al (2010)
Support services
Utilization of Business service support.
Infrastructure and Physical resources
Shamsuddin (2014)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3195
www.rsisinternational.org
SMEs Performance
Profitability
Market Value
Growth
Employee satisfaction
Customer Satisfaction
Environmental Performance
Social Performance
Santos & Brito (2012)
Table 2: Sources of Variable
CONCLUSION
The impact of networking and support services (incubator and accelerator) on business performance has gained
significant attention among policymakers and academician. Networking and support services (incubator and
accelerator) are essential on the success of SMEs performance. Networking enables SMEs to gain access to
valuable resources, knowledge, and opportunities that can boost the innovation, enhance market visibility and
support overall business growth. Moreover, SMEs able to reduce transaction costs, experience sharing and
strengthens supply chain reliability through collaborative environment nurtured by networking activities. Next,
incubators provide grounding assistances for SMEs by offering mentorship, funding, and access to a network.
Meanwhile accelerators focus on providing fixed cohort for SME such as intensive mentorship, resources
accessibility and networking opportunities that can significantly accelerate growth and market entry thus
positively enhance the capability of SMEs on refining their business performance effectively. By leveraging
networking opportunities and the structured support of incubators and accelerators, SMEs can enhance their
competitiveness, foster innovation, and achieve sustainable growth in an increasingly dynamic business
environment. Thus, this conceptual study establishes a fundamental framework for assessing the potential impact
of networking and support services (incubators and accelerators) on the business performance of SMEs in
Selangor, Malaysia. By synthesizing established theoretical perspectives and suggesting novel relationships, the
study advances a comprehensive and empirically grounded theoretical model. However, as this is a conceptual
study, the findings discussed in this paper are theoretical and have not yet undergone empirical validation. To
advance this research, extensive empirical investigation is anticipated to extend over a duration of approximately
three to six months depending on the accessibility of the target population and response rates.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors acknowledge the University Teknologi MARA for funding under the Geran Penyelidikan Dana UiTM
Cawangan Selangor (DUCS) 3.0 (600-UiTMSEL (P.I 5/4) (010/2021).
REFERENCES
1. M. Tabas, J. M. Kansheba and C. Theodoraki, (2024). Igniting a knowledge renaissance: revolutionising
entrepreneurial ecosystems with transactive memory systems. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol.
28. No 11. Pp. 199-220.
2. Sharma, N.Das, S.P. Singh. (2023), Causal association of entrepreneurship ecosystem and financial
inclusion”,. Heliyon, Vol.9. e14596.
3. Abd Rashid, N., Hasim, N., and Zainal Abidin, M. (2021). Factors Influencing SMEs Sustainability: The
Role of Islamic Crowdfunding. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
4. Adeel. T., Muhammad. S.U.K.S., Marina. D., Muhammad. M. R., & Marko. T., (2024). Interlinking
networking capabilities, knowledge worker productivity, and digital innovation: a critical nexus for
sustainable performance in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 28
No. 11 2024, Pp. 179-198.
5. Ahmad, M.F., (2024). Accelerating Business Growth Through Technology-Based Venturing in Small-
to-Medium Enterprises. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. Vol.834. Pp. 205
220.
6. Al- Baimani. N, Clifton.N , Jones. E, Pugh. R (2021). Applying the ecosystem model in a new context?
The case of business incubation in Oman. Growth and Change. Vol. 52. Pp. 663686.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3196
www.rsisinternational.org
7. Almeida, R. I. da S., Pinto, A. P. S., & Henriques, C. M. R. (2021). The effect of incubation on business
performance: A comparative study in the Centro region of Portugal. Review of Business Management,
23(1), 127140. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v23i1.4089.
8. Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Baah, C., & Essel, D. (2022). Exploring the role of external pressure,
environmental sustainability commitment, engagement, alliance and circular supply chain capability in
circular economy performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,
52(5/6), 431-455.
9. Bandera, C., & Thomas, E. (2018). The role of innovation ecosystems and social capital in startup
survival. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(4), 542-551.
10. Ben Amara, D. and Chen, H. (2020), “Investigating the effect of multidimensional network capability
and eco-innovation orientation for sustainable performance”, Clean Technologies and Environmental
Policy, Springer, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 1297-1309.
11. Bojan. M. M., Zorica. K.C., & Zoran. B., (2022). Analysis of the Relationship Between Strategic
Networking and Performance Among Croatian Service Sector SMEs. Eurasian Studies in Business and
Economics. Vol.22. Pp. 151 168.
12. C.L.N.Nixon and D.Valliere, (2021). Entrepreneurial logic and fit: a cross-level model of incubator
performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. Vol.27. No.7. pp. 1696-
1723. DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0801.
13. Cearra, J., Saiz-Santos, M. and Barrutia, J. (2021). An empiric experience implementing a methodology
to improve the entrepreneurial support system: creating social value through collaboration and Co-
creation. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.728387.
14. Cisi, M., Devicienti, F., Manello, A., and Vannoni, D., (2020). The advantages of formalizing networks:
new evidence from Italian SMEs. Small Business Economics. Vol. 54, pp. 1183 1200.
15. Cohen, S., Fehder, D.C., Hochberg, Y.V., Murray, F., (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Res.
Pol. 48 (7), 17811797.
16. de Almeida, J.M.G., Gohr, C.F., Morioka, S.N. and da Nobrega, B.M. (2021), “Towards an integrative
framework of collaborative capabilities for sustainability: a systematic review and research agenda,
Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier, Vol. 279, p. 123789.
17. Del Sarto, N., Isabelle, D. A., & Di Minin, A. (2020). The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA
analysis of Italian startups. Technovation, 90-91, 113.
18. Di Gregorio, Musteen, & Thomas, (2021). International business opportunity recognition and
development (Online first). International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2021-0227.
19. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The role of digital innovation
20. in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of
21. Business Research, 123, 220231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042
22. Eggers, F., Niemand, T., Filser, M., Kraus, S., Berchtold, J., (2020). To network or not to network Is
that really the question? The impact of networking intensity and strategic orientations on innovation
success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol.155.
23. Eiriz, V. (2020). Spatial proximity and SME strategy in local networks. Journal of Business & Industrial
Marketing, 35(2), 338348.
24. Feld. B (2012). Start-up Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City”. Wiley
London.
25. Ganjeh, Y.M., Khani, N. and Tabriz, A.A., (2020). The relationship between networking capability and
commercialisation performance by considering the role of dimensions of network structure. International
Journal of Business Innovation and Research. Vol.22, pp. 47 68.
26. Gilmore, A., (2020). SME marketing networking. Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Marketing. Pp. 35
47.
27. Hassan, H., Ying, Q., Ahmad, H., & Ilyas, S. (2019). Factors that sustain health and safety management
practices in the food industry”. Sustainability, 11(15), 4001.
28. Indarwati, T. A., Andjarwati, A.L., Dhenabayu, R., & Sanaji., (2024). Strengthening Adaptive Capability
and Networking Capability to Enhance Innovation and Business Performance of Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and
Applications, DASA 2024.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3197
www.rsisinternational.org
29. Jeong, H, Shin, K Kim, S and Kim, E. (2021). What Types of Government Support on Food SMEs
Improve Innovation Performance?. Sustainability. Vol 13, 9461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169461.
30. John, E., (2024). Show me your networks and i’ll tell you your future:entrepreneurial networks and SME
performance. Cogent Business and Management. Vol.11. Issue 1.
31. Lee, I. and Shin, Y.J. (2018), Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and
challenges”, Business Horizons, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 35-46.
32. Liao, S., Fei, W. and Chen, C. (2007), “Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation
capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries”, Journal of Information
Science, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 340-359.
33. Lim, S.-Y. and Bakar, S.A., (2018). A conceptual model of intention to practice corporate governance
among Malaysian small and medium enterprises. Proceedings of the 31st International Business
Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2018: Innovation Management and Education
Excellence through Vision 2020. Pp. 893 907.
34. Lynette.L, Mazlina. A.R., Syed. M. B., Uswatun. H. Z., Norshahida. C.B, Norizah.Z & Muhammad.
B.B., (2024). Economic Research. SME Bank Economic Research. pp
4.https://www.smebank.com.my/documents/d/guest/economic-digest-budget-2025-v2.
35. J.M. Kansheba, , C.N. Fubah, A.M Tabas & M.I. Marobhe, (2025), Strategic Pathways for New Venture
Legitimacy within the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem”. European Management Journal.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.03.004
36. Kanayo. K. O., Maria. E , and Ebenezer O. (2023). Interaction and Main Effects of Finance Support and
Other Business Support Services on the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Mpumalanga
Province, South Africa. Economies 11: 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ economies11060157.
37. Klerk S.D, Miles.M.P, Bliemel. M (2024). A life cycle perspective of startup accelerators. International
Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Vol. 20 pp. 327343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-
00933-7
38. Koendjbiharie, S., Koppius, O., Vervest, P., & Van Heck, E (2010). Network transparency and the
performance of dynamic business networks. Conference Proceedings. 4th IEEE International Conference
on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies - Conference Proceedings of IEEE-DEST 2010, DEST 2010.
Pp. 197 - 202
39. MAGIC (2023), available at https://www.mymagic.my/ (accessed 20 June 2024).
40. Maghsoudi-Ganjeh, Y., Khani, N., Alem-Tabriz., (2021). Networking Capability and Commercialization
Performance: The Role of Network Structure. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing. Vol. 28. Pp.
51 68.
41. Masoud.K, Ben, W. & Lisa. M., (2023). Effectual networking capability and SME performance in
international B2B markets. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. Vol.38 No 12. Pp. 26552672.
42. Mikhailitchenko, A., (2021). Antecedents and outcomes of network involvement in the
internationalization process: A case of SMEs from the USA, China, and Russia. Organizations and
Markets in Emerging Economies. Vol.12. Pp. 6 26.
43. Milovanovic, B.M, Krzelj, C.Z & Bubas, Z. (2022). Analysis of the Relationship Between Strategic
Networking and Performance Among Croatian Service Sector SMEs. Eurasian Studies in Business and
Economics. Vol.22 pp. 151 168.
44. Ministry of Finance (2025), Budget Speech 2025”.
https://belanjawan.mof.gov.my/pdf/belanjawan2025/ucapan/ub25-en.pdf.
45. MEDC (2023), available at : https://www.kuskop.gov.my/ (accessed 20 June 2024).
46. MRRD (2023), available at https://www.rurallink.gov.my/(accessed 20 June 2024).
47. Moritz. A., Tamara.N., Eva.L., (2020). Accelerators as drivers of coopetition among early-stage startups.
Technovation. Vol.111.
48. Mulyana, M., and Wasitowati. W., (2021). The Improvement of Collaborative Networks to Increase
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Performance. Serbian Journal of Management. Vol.16 Pp. 213
229.
49. Muhammad. A., Atiq. U.R., Syed.Z.A.S., (2018). Networking and new venture’s performance: mediating
role of competitive advantage. International Journal of Emerging Markets 29 November 2018; 13 (5):
9981025. https://doi-org.ezaccess.remotexs.co/10.1108/IJoEM-07-2017-0263.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3198
www.rsisinternational.org
50. Nakku, V. B., Agbola, F. W., Miles, M. P., & Mahmood, A. (2020). The interrelationship between SME
government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy
perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 231.
51. OECD, 2024. Global Corporate Sustainability Report 2024. OECD Publishing, Paris.
52. Paola.P and Giuseppe.M., (2021). Business incubators vs start-ups: a sustainable way of sharing
knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol.26 Pp. 1235-1261.
53. Pinto. J.C., and Rua, O. L., (2023). Incubators’ practices influence in the born global startup’s
internationalization process,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 100134, 2023,
doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100134.
54. Rozmi, A.N.A., Nohuddin, P.P., Hadi, A.R.A., Bakar, M.I.A (2021). Identifying Small and Medium
Enterprise Smart Entrepreneurship Training Framework Components using Thematic Analysis and
Expert Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. Vol.12. Pp. 298
309.
55. Santos & Brito (2012). Toward a Subjective measurement model for Firm Performance. Brazilian
Administration Review. DOI: 10.1590/S1807-76922012000500007.
56. Sarto, N. D., Cazares, C. C., & Minin, A. D. (2022). Startup accelerators as an open environment: The
impact on startups’ innovative performance. Technovation, 113, Article 102425.
57. SIDEC(2023), available at https://www.sidec.com.my/ (accessed 15 May 2023).
58. Siwiec, D. (2023). Qualitative-environment actions expected by SMEs from V4 countries to improve
products. System Safety: Human-Technical Facility- Environment. Vol.5 (1). pp.28-35.
59. Shahid.G., Tim. M., Geoffrey. N.S., (2023). Networking benefits for SME members of co-operatives.
Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. Vol.11.
60. Shamsuddin, J.B., Management, B., Idrus, S. Al, Islam, U., Maulana, N. and Ibrahim, M. (2020).
Relationship of perception and awareness towards utilization of government business support services
(Gbss) in Malaysian Smes perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-12.
61. SME Bank (2019), “Recognizing The Challenges of SME Financing”, Impulse: A Monthly Bulletin for
Entrepreneurs, Issue 38: March-April 2019.
62. SME Bank (2020), Challenges To SME Growth”, Bizpulse: A Monthly Bulletin for Entrepreneurs,
Issue 58: November-December 2020.
63. SMECorp (2023), available at : https://www.smecorp.gov.my/index.php/en/ (accessed 16 May 2023).
64. Su, Z., Xie, E. and Wang, D. (2015), Entrepreneurial orientation, managerial networking, and new
venture performance in China”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 228-248.
65. Tehseen, S., Qureshi, Z.H., Ramayah, T., (2018). Impact of network competence on firm’s performances
among Chinese and Indian entrepreneurs: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of
Entrepreneurship. Vol. 22.
66. The Star (2025). SME Corp targets RM1 trillion GDP contribution from MSMEs by 2030.
https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2025/08/04/sme-corp-targets-rm1-trillion-gdp-
contribution-from-msmes-by-2030.
67. Tran, H.T.T and Tron, V.N. (2023). The Differential Effects of Government Support, Inter-Firm
Collaboration, and Firm Financial Resources on SME Performance in Vietnam. Cuadernos de Economia.
Vol.46, Pp. 124 134.
68. Van Weele, M.A., van Rijnsoever, F.J., Eveleens, C.P., Steinz, H., van Stijn, N., Groen, M., (2018b).
Start-EU-up! Lessons from international incubation practices to address the challenges faced by Western
European start-ups. J. Technol. Transf 43, 11611189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9538-8.
69. Yang. M, Jaafar.N, Mamun, A., Salameh. A., and Nawi. N. (2022). Modelling the significance of
strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid sem-neural
network analysis. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1).
70. Yunus, E.N. and Ernawati, E., (2025). Awakening the giant within: turning SME’s survival strategy into
improved performance. International Journal of Innovation Science. Vol. 17., Pp. 463 486.
71. Yusoff, M.N.H, Merican, R.M.A.R, Zainudin, S.A, Nasir, N.A, Abdullah, T. & Said, N.M, (2022).
Measuring the Government Business Support Services and Performance of SMEs. Lecture Notes in
Networks and Systems. Vol. 486. Pp 609 626. 10.1007/978-3-031-08087-6_44.
72. Wang, Z., He, Q., Xia, S., Sarpong, D., Xiong, A., & Maas, G., (2020). Capacities of
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 3199
www.rsisinternational.org
73. business incubator and regional innovation performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
158, Article 120125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
74. techfore.2020.120125.
75. Xu, Y., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.E. and Gonzalez-Garcia, J. (2015), “Crowdsourcing, innovation and firm
performance”, Management Decision, Vol. 53 No. 6, pp. 1158-1169.
76. Zhang, S., Zhang, N., Zhu, S. Liu, F., (2020). A foot in two camps or your undivided attention? The
impact of intra- and inter-community collaboration on firm innovation performance. Technology
Analysis and Strategic Management. Vol.32. Pp. 753 768.