Worker’s participation: This study found that the workers were involved in implementing COVID 19 safety
measures. This finding is in line with what Crawford (2019), found in his study in which he established that
worker participation is important in all aspects of workplace changes which are developed to assess work-related
risks and reduced work-related injury and work-related health problems
Safety communication: This study found that safety communication was embraced between the workers and the
employees regarding safety and the required safety measures that employees need to observe. This finding
supports what Williams (2003) in a study conducted in the South East of the United States steel manufacturing
facility found in his study. In this study it was noted that one of the most effective ways to improve a safety
culture and prevent injuries is to optimize safety-related communication throughout an organization
CONCLUSION
The study concludes that there was a significant relationship between workers knowledge of safety standards
and COVID 19 pandemic. This therefore supports the debate that knowledge of safety standards prevented the
employees from contracting COVID 19 as they were able to prevent and cure the disease for those who
unfortunately contracted it. The study also concluded that with effective safety policies if adhered to will ensure
that employees minimize and prevent occupational injuries and diseases at the workplace such as contracting
corona virus. It also concluded that worker participation in implementation of safety standards is important as
the more they participate the less the resistance of adhering to the safety protocols. In regards to safety
communication the study conclude that the university management should continually communicate on ways to
prevent, cure and handle employees affected by the COVID 19 pandemic.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the documents reviewed and key informant interviews conducted the following are the
recommendations:
The study recommends that there should be periodic safety training and awareness of safety standards from
university employees in regards to COVID 19 pandemic. It also recommends that in regards to safety policies,
the universities should have well-structured policies and have a mechanism to enforce these policies so that
employees can be able to comply and ensure work safety is adhered to. The study also recommends for worker
participation that workers should be involved in decision making of safety standards so that they can own those
policies. This will make it easier for them to comply with the set safety standards since they participated in
making them. Finally, in regards to safety communication, the study recommends that there should be efficient
safety communication from the top management to subordinate staff. Safety regulations and instructions should
be well displayed in strategic areas where employees work.
REFERENCES
1. Ahmad, I., Sattar, A., & Nawaz, A. (2016). Occupational health and safety in industries in developing
world. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(4).
2. Akinwale A.A. and Olusanya O.A., (2016) “Implications of occupational health and safety intelligence
in Nigeria,” Journal of Global Health Care Systems, 6(1), pp.1-13, www.jhgcs.info
3. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage learning.
4. Collaço N, Wagland R, Alexis O, Gavin A, Glaser A, Watson EK. (2021) Using the framework method
for the analysis of qualitative dyadic data in health research. Qual Health Res.31(8):1555–64
5. Crawford, J. (2019). Employment and the Workplace Supporting Healthy Aging. In Healthy Aging (pp.
349-354). Springer, Cham
6. Creswell J. (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand
Oaks, California 91320: SAGE Publications Inc.; 472 p
7. Dückers, M., Faber, M., Cruijsberg, J., Grol, R., Schoonhoven, L., & Wensing, M. (2009). Safety and
risk management interventions in hospitals. Medical care research and review, 66(6_suppl), 90S-119S.
8. Goldsmith LJ. (2021)Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. Qual Rep. 26(6):2061–
76