
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
The Gothic double in Sitora Harimau Jadian (1965) sheds light on Dr Effendi’s tumultuous psyche; oscillating
between embracing modernity and repelling old taboos that were prevalent in the Malay society at Kampung
Kiambang, Johor, Malaysia. Firstly, he stands as a symbolic figure that opposes Tok Dukun and overall old
superstitions, who resists any semblance of fresh, societal progress. The staunch opposition from Tok Dukun
is understandable, as it can be seen as a threat to his livelihood. As the witch doctor at Kampung Kiambang,
the villagers sought the treatment provided by him in exchange for cash remuneration, and with the emergence
of the weretiger hauntings, Sitora would cement and ensure his relevance at the village.
In comparison to the problem-solving reading strategies, the readers used a few similar strategies that eased
their online reading process.
For a character that is hell-bent on rejecting any progress or any kind of modern way of doing things, Tok
Dukun has no issue benefiting from capitalism, as revealed in the text that he was the Sitora who haunted
Kampung Kiambang to no end (Ramlee, 1965, p. 201). The fraudulent figure imposed protection fees for those
who required his assistance in extinguishing the supernatural threat, and not doing so would guarantee
constant, disturbing rampages of the weretiger (Ramlee, 1965, p. 16). This indicates the similarity he shares
with Dr Effendi in adapting to modern society, albeit his intention is never related to seeing the betterment of
the villagers’ well-being, but to fuel both his ego and bank account.
When conscripted to the village that was deemed rural, Dr Effendi pondered his fate and the unfamiliarity of
being sequestered in a foreign setting, as if he was uprooted from his usual element and belonging. This can be
seen on page 38 of the text:
Dr Effendi agak tidak senang. Sebenarnya dia tidak begitu senang tinggal di desa yang terlalu sunyi. Dia telah
biasa dengan udara kota dengan lampu - lampu neon yang beribu aneka. Kini, di desa itu ia terpaksa
mengurung dirinya di dalam kesepian dan kesunyian. Walau bagaimanapun, untuk mengatakan yang ianya
tidak suka sudah tentu di luar perhitungannya.
Dr Effendi felt unease with his current situation. He had never enjoyed living in a quiet village because he was
so used to the arid city air and the brightness of the electrifying neon lights. Although the village entrapped
him in eerie silence and loneliness, he had no choice but to bear through it all.
(Ramlee, 1965, p. 38)
The bolded words of “unease”, “entrapped”, “eerie silence”, and “loneliness” show the earlier signs of Gothic
transgression experienced by Dr Effendi. Although he remained firm in his modern principles and beliefs at
this particular juncture of this story, he recognised the suffocation of the unknown he could not place as of yet.
From the initial accounts of a few villagers regarding their terrifying encounters with Sitora, he treated the
affected villagers through a modern approach of science and medicine, and its effectiveness was enough to
convince the villagers that the service provided by Tok Dukun was beginning to falter.
However, when Dr Effendi finally crossed paths with Sitora, his principles began to dwindle (Ramlee, 1965, p.
84-85), and his credibility was questioned by the Village Chief, indicating that his presence was to combat
superstition, not propagating it (Ramlee, 1965, p. 85). The willingness to seek out the person who shares
opposite values and thinking for the greater good, in this case, extinguishing Sitora, speaks volumes of Dr
Effendi’s character that embodies goodness and virtue.
Yet, the anxiety that already occupies his state of mind is epitomised when he was sired by Sitora himself.
Akin to the Westernised depiction of turning werewolves, Dr Effendi was turned after his open wound on his
neck was mixed with Sitora’s blood (Ramlee, 1965, p. 143). Another irony of the mediating rural versus urban
notion, instead of scratching the wound open with his animalistic claws, Sitora used a knife, which is a
symbolic man-made hunting weapon that precipitated human civilisation. Nonetheless, it does not reflect his