INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 433
www.rsisinternational.org
Cyber Security Awareness among Digital Banking users in Malaysia
Mohd Hafiz Bakar
1*
, Siti Norbaya Yahaya
2
& Nurul Nadia Ramli
3
1
Faculty of Business & Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Melaka Kampus Alor
Gajah, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Melaka, Malaysia.
2,3
Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal,
Melaka, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000038
Received: 29 September 2025; Accepted: 07 October 2025; Published: 03 November 2025
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to assess the level of cyber security awareness among Malaysians who utilize the
digital banking services. In addition to secondary data (such as journal articles, books, websites, and news
articles), a survey questionnaire serves as the major data source for this study. A quantitative technique is also
employed to collect information from a sample of 399 Malaysian digital banking users. Among Malaysians who
utilize digital banking, knowledge of cyberattacks, laws and regulations, and multi-factor authentication are all
significantly correlated with cybersecurity awareness. This study looks at the knowledge that users of digital
banking should have about cyber security, including knowledge of laws and guidelines, multi-factor
authentication (MFA), and cyber-attacks.
Keywords: Cyber security, digital banking, cyber-attacks, multi-factor authentication
INTRODUCTION
Due to the growing digitalization of financial services, improving cyber security in digital banking has become
essential in Malaysia. The risk of cyber-attacks has considerably increased as more Malaysians conduct financial
transactions online or via mobile devices. The Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia) has made
many measures to enhance cyber security in digital banking in order to address these threats. Guidelines for the
Management of Cyber Risk are one of these projects. Bank Negara Malaysia released guidelines in 2013 to help
financial institutions manage cyber risk. These recommendations emphasized the significance of putting
appropriate security measures in place to identify and stop cyber-attacks. In 2018, Bank Negara Malaysia
published a cyber security framework that mandates the implementation of comprehensive cyber security
programs for financial institutions that address governance, risk management, and incident management. In
2019, Bank Negara Malaysia introduced this platform. Financial institutions may proactively identify and
mitigate cyber threats thanks to this platform's real-time cyber threat intelligence.
Customers can feel more secure while making financial transactions online or using mobile devices because
financial institutions are now better able to detect and prevent cyber- attacks.
Payment with debit card online Customers may use the internet and cell phones to access all sorts of bank
services 24 hours a day, and they can simply transact and manage their accounts from anywhere in the world
(Dr. S. Nagaraju, 2022). However, despite how simple and straightforward banking-related activities are, cyber
security is one area that needs to be given priority. The information and data banking is quite private. It is
susceptible to online threats including hacking, data theft, and others. As the number of people using digital
banking rises and its use spreads, this is becoming more and more the case. Cyber security threats are a growing
concern for the digital banking industry in Malaysia. According to a survey conducted by the Malaysian
computer Emergency Response Team (MyCERT), there was a 102% increase in reported cyber incidents in the
banking and financial sector in Malaysia in 2019 compared to the previous year (Kuan, 2020). These incidents
range from ransomware attacks to phishing scams and can result in financial losses for individuals and businesses
alike. The Malaysian government has acknowledged the importance of cyber security in the financial sector and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 434
www.rsisinternational.org
has implemented various measures to improve it. The Central Bank of Malaysia has established guidelines for
financial institutions to ensure the security of their systems and customer data (Bank Negara Malaysia, 2018).
Additionally, the Malaysian Computer Emergency Response Team (MyCERT) provides cyber security training
and support to financial institutions.
Despite these efforts, more needs to be done to improve cyber security in digital banking in Malaysia. To detect
and mitigate cyber-attacks, financial institutions must invest in modern technologies such as artificial
intelligence and machine learning. They should also regularly update their security systems and conduct regular
vulnerability assessments to ensure that they are protected against the latest threats. Furthermore, customers need
to be educated on the importance of cyber security and how to protect themselves from cyber threats. Financial
institutions should provide regular security awareness training to their customers and ensure that their digital
banking platforms are user-friendly and secure.
In conclusion, cyber security is a critical issue that needs to be addressed in the digital banking sector in Malaysia.
Financial institutions and the government must work together to implement proactive measures to aware about
cyber security and protect customers data from cyber threats. Also, users of digital banking must aware how
important cyber security in digital banking. The aim of this research is to study the cyber security awareness
among digital banking users in Malaysia. The research objectives developed in this study based on the problem
statement above as follow:
To identify cyber security awareness in digital banking.
To measure the level of cyber security awareness to digital banking.
To examine the most critical of cyber security awareness in digital banking.
Conceptual framework, theoretical review, and hypothesis development
Awareness of Cyber Attack
According to Amar Johri and Shailendra Kumar (2023), traditional banks become more exposed to cyber-attacks
after cooperating with Fintech companies. In this era, nothing can save us from cyber-attacks, especially
financially. Nida Tariq (2018) also said cybercrimes as a technological disease are spreading very speedily in the
present era. Nothing is secure now and financial institutions are under great threat.
Awareness of Policies and Regulations
According to Juan Carlos Crisanto, et. Al (2017), Cyber-security regulations should require banks to develop
effective control and response frameworks for cyber- risk. On the authority of Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)
(2020), the Bank endeavors to ensure the regulatory framework remains conducive for enablement of these
innovations in a safe and sound manner that supports transformation of the financial ecosystem to meet future
economic needs of the nation and promote sustainable and inclusive financial sector. According to David Smith
(2020), cyber security regulations exist that encourage banks to share information regarding cyber threats among
one another. The aim is to mitigate cyber-attacks and enhance overall cyber security in the banking industry.
Awareness of Multi-Factor Authentications
With the rise of digital banking and the increasing sophistication of cyberattacks, MFA has become an essential
security measure for financial institutions to protect their customerssensitive information and assets. Without
MFA, customer accounts are vulnerable to hacking, identity theft, and other forms of fraud, which can lead to
significant financial losses and reputational damage for both the institution and the individual. Therefore, MFA
is an important step in digital banking to enhance the security of customer accounts and maintain trust in financial
institutions. As stated by Amar Johri and et. al, (2022), users must realize that two-factor authentication is a
measure used to defend client bank accounts againts online intrusions.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 435
www.rsisinternational.org
Fig.1 Theoretical framework developed by Federico Sinigagliaa, et. al (2020)
The conceptual framework proposed for this study aims to visually represent the various constructs and variables
involved, and the connections between them. The independent variable includes three type of awareness: cyber-
attack, policies and regulations, and multi-factor authentications. Through a diagram, the framework outlines the
links between these independent variables and dependent variables under study.
Fig.2 Conceptual Framework
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The choice of research technique is a critical decision in the research design process because it defines how
relevant information for a study will be gathered; yet, the research design process comprises several connected
considerations. It serves as a guide for the gathering, measuring, and interpretation of data. Because it gives the
study direction and identifies what has to be done that may be valuable to the study, researchers believe that
research design is crucial. This study’s objective is cyber security awareness (independent variables) among
digital banking users (dependent variables).
This investigation was carried out utilising quantitative methods. According to Oberiri Destiny Apuke (2017),
quantitative research begins with the formulation of a problem, the development of a hypothesis or research
question, the evaluation of related literature, and the quantitative analysis of data. The best way to gauge the link
between the independent and dependent variables is through quantitative research. An independent variable
(sometimes called an experimental or predictor variable) is a variable that is being manipulated in an experiment
in order to observe the effect this has on a dependent variable (sometimes called an outcome variable). The
dependent variable is simply that; a variable that is dependent on an independent variable(s). In order to answer
the research question and to test research hypothesis, this study includes dependent variables consist of digital
banking on users and three independent variables which are awareness of cyber-attacks, awareness of policies
and regulations, and awareness of multi- factor authentication.
Data Collection
The research used both primary and secondary data. The original data were more reliable and provided a better
degree of confidence in decision-making, with the trustworthy analysis having a direct link with the occurrences
(Kassu Jilcha Sileyew, 2019). Primary data, according to Syed Muhammad Sajjad Kabir (2016), is knowledge
obtained from personal experience. Primary data, which is more reliable, authentic, and impartial, has not yet
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 436
www.rsisinternational.org
been disclosed. In contrast, secondary data is information acquired from a source that has already been published
in some form or another. In any research, a review of literature is based on secondary data.
For the purpose of providing the questionnaire to respondents in this study, a self- administered survey approach
is used. The questionnaire is divided into three pieces. Demographic data including gender, age, income,
education and occupation, and etc. were expected to be gathered in Section A. Section B then asks users in
Malaysia questions about cyber security awareness in digital banking using several Likert scale questions. In
addition, section C includes additional questions about cyber security awareness are awareness of cyber-attacks,
awareness of policies and regulations, and awareness of multi-factor authentication. The questions were designed
to ascertain respondentsopinions on each component linked to cyber security awareness.
To clarify, probability sampling (or representative sampling) is most typically connected with survey research
methodologies in which you must draw statistical inferences about a population from your sample in order to
answer your research question(s) and accomplish your objectives. Non-probability sampling (or non-random
sampling) offers a variety of sample selection procedures, the majority of which incorporate an element of
subjective assessment.
The technique is random sampling because the researcher employs probability sampling. This method of
choosing sample size assumes that each sample has an equal and independent chance of being chosen from the
population under study. The survey’s intended users are Malaysians who utilize digital banking. According to
the researcher, Malaysia has 32.5 million people. Robert V. Krejcie and Daryle W. Morgan (1970) stated that the
sample size is 384 when the population is greater than 1 000 000. 384 individuals are so chosen to complete
surveys and serve as a source of data and evaluation.
Malaysia state is the primary focus of the investigation. The rationale for selecting this country is that Malaysia
is quickly expanding its use of digital banking. According to Ong Ching Chuan (2019), the year 2020 would be
an exciting year for Malaysian banking. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) has issued rules that allow technology
companies and other non-financial entities to compete directly with traditional banks. Successful digital banks
often identify a market gap with adequate size and growth and develop a business strategy that caters to the
needs of that target group.
DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
The purpose of pilot study is to test the feasibility of the questionnaire whether respondents can understand the
questions. In this study, the researcher select 40 respondents which are 10% of total respondents. Cronbach’s
alpha is used to measure the consistency of data where the value not less than 0.7 represent that the questionnaire
has consistent reliability.
Awareness of Cyber Security
Table 1: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.741
4
Awareness of Policies and Regulations
Table 2: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.773
5
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 437
www.rsisinternational.org
Awareness of Multi-Factor Authentications
Table 3: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.787
5
Cyber Security Awareness
Table 4: Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.702
4
Reliability Analysis
Table 5: Reliability Statistics
N of Items
18
Descriptive Analysis
Awareness of Cyber Attack
The response of 399 respondents on independent variable, awareness of cyber security that focusing on
awareness can reduce cybercrime. The item CA1 states that users of digital banking believe focusing on
awareness can reduce cybercrime. From the result, there are 66.9% respondents strongly agree on the statement,
30.3% of respondents agree on the statement and 2.5% expressed neutral. However, there are 0.3% of
respondents disagree on the statement.
The item CA2 describe users aware about all kinds of threats. Based on the result obtained, there has 30.6%
strongly agree on the statement and majority of respondents (41.9%) agree on the statement. There are 18.8% of
respondents claims that they are neutral but 6.5% of respondents disagree and 2.3% strongly disagree on the
statement.
Next, item CA3 explain that respondents should concerned about the possibility of cyber attacks affecting digital
banking transaction. From the table, majority of respondents (58.1%) strongly agree to concerned about the
possibility of cyber attacks affecting digital banking transactions and 30.3% agree on the statement followed by
11.5% of respondents are neutral on the statement. There has no respondents not concerned about the possibility
of cyber attacks affecting digital banking transaction.
Besides, item CA4 states that respondents would like to reports suspicious email or activity related to digital
banking transactions to bank. There are 44.9% of respondents strongly agree and 46.1% of respondents agree on
the statement followed by 8% of respondents claim that they feel neutral on the statement. On the other side,
there are 0.8% of respondents disagree and 0.3% strongly disagree on the statement.
Awareness of Policies and Regulations
The responses of 399 respondents on awareness of policies and regulations. Items PR1 states that users need to
be aware of government regulations concerning digital banking. There are 51.6% respondents strongly agree
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 438
www.rsisinternational.org
followed by 46.6% respondents agree with the statement. 1.5% respondents claims that they are neutral on the
statement. However, only 0.3% of respondents disagree and no respondents strongly disagree with the statement.
The item PR2 describe respondents think current regulations in digital banking protect customers. There are
45.1% respondents strongly agree and 50.4% respondents agree on the statement. The table also shows that there
are 3.5% respondents are neutral on the statement. On the other hand, there are 1% respondents disagree and no
respondent strongly disagree.
Next, the item PR3 state that respondents should aware of the privacy policies of the digital banking institution
we use. Based on the table, 45.9% respondents strongly agree on the statement and 44.6% respondents agree on
the statement. However, there are respondents who have different opinions where 9.3% respondents are neutral
while 0.3% respondents disagree with the statement and no one strongly disagree with the statement.
The fourth statement, PR4 states that respondents believe that digital banking institutions adequately protect
personal data. There are 43.6% respondents strongly agree and 31.6% respondents agree on the statement.
However, there are respondents who have different opinions where 22.1% are neutral while 1.8% respondents
disagree with the statement and 1% respondents are strongly disagree with statement PR4.
Item PR5 declare that respondents believe that regulations are necessary in digital banking. The results show
that 51.4% respondents are strongly agree that regulations are necessary in digital banking and 46.9%
respondents agree with the statement. Nevertheless, 1.5% respondents are neutral while 0.3% respondents
disagree with the statement and no one strongly disagree with the statement.
Awareness of Multi-factor Authentications (MFA)
The result of awareness of multi-factor authentications among users of digital banking. The item MF1 point out
respondents believe MFA so effective preventing unauthorized access to transactions. There are 46.1%
respondents strongly agree and 34.6% respondents agree with the statement. In addition, 18.8% respondents are
neutral with the statement. However, there are 0.5% respondents disagree and no respondents strongly disagree
with the statement.
Item MF2 highlight on whether respondents use the same password across multiple online accounts, including
bank account will expose to cyber attacks. Most of the respondents (50.4%) strongly agree on the statement and
37.6% agree that use the same password across multiple online accounts, including bank account will expose to
cyber attack. There are 7.3% respondents neutral with the statement. However, there are 2.5% respondents
disagree on the statement and 2.3% respondents strongly disagree.
Item MF3 states that respondents enabled MFA for digital banking account. There are 37.1% respondents
strongly agree that user need to enabled MFA for digital banking account and 51.9% respondents agree with item
MF3. Furthermore, 9.5% respondents feel neutral on the statement. Conversely, there are 1% respondents
disagree on the statement and 0.5% respondents strongly disagree with the statement.
Next, item T4 mention that respondents think that it is not difficult for me to set up and use MFA for digital
banking transactions. 34.6% respondents strongly agree on the statement and 42.1% respondents agree on the
statement. There are 21.6% respondents are neutral on the statement. 1% respondents disagree that MFA is not
difficult to set up for digital banking while 0.8% respondents strongly disagree on the statement.
Lastly, item MF5 states that respondents should change MFA settings or update authentication methods
frequently. There are 32.3% respondents strongly agree and 43.1% respondents agree on the statement. 21.1%
respondents are neutral on the statement. However, 1.5% respondents are disagree that MFA settings or update
my authentication methods frequently should to change and 2% respondents strongly disagree with the
statement.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 439
www.rsisinternational.org
Awareness of Cyber Security
Descriptive statistics results of the dependent variable, awareness of cyber security. Item CS1 describe that
respondents received any suspicious emails or messages asking for personal or banking information. There are
5.3% respondents strongly agree that they always received any suspicious emails or messages asking for personal
or banking information and 6.3% respondents agree with the statement. Aside, there 19% respondents feel
neutral with item CS1. However, 31.6% respondents disagree and 37.8% respondents strongly disagree on the
statement.
Item CS2 point out that respondents frequently check account activity and statements for any unusual
transactions or activity. There are 22.6% respondents who are strongly agree and strongly disagree on the
statement. However, 8.3% respondents agree and 15.5% respondents feel neutral with item CS2. Majority of the
respondents disagree on the statement, which is 31.1% respondents.
Item CS3 highlight that respondents have received any cyber security training or education from bank or other
trusted sources to stay away and safe online. There are 10.3% respondents strongly agree with the statement and
8.8% respondents agree. In addition, 20.6% respondents are neutral on the statement. There are 27.6%
respondents who disagree and 32.8% respondents strongly disagree that they received any cyber security training
or education from bank or other trusted sources to stay away and safe online. Next, CS4 states that respondents
will checked on a suspicious link or attachment in an email or message, or downloaded an app from an untrusted
source. There are 2.3% respondents strongly agree and 2% respondents agree on the statement. However, 12.8%
respondents feel neutral on the statement followed by 24.3% respondents disagree with the statement. Majority
of respondents strongly disagree (58.6%) with the statement.
Respondent’s Profile
Table 6: Gender
Frequency
Percent
Cumulative percent
Female
226
56.6
56.6
Male
173
43.4
100
Total
399
100
Table shows the frequency and percentage of respondents’ demographic of gender. There are total 399
respondents and among the respondents, male respondents consist of 173 which is are 43.4% while female
respondents consist of 226 which are 56.6% as shown in the figure.
Table 7: Age
Frequency
Percent
Cumulative percent
18-23 years old
174
43.6
43.6
24-29 years old
88
22.1
65.7
30-35 years old
51
12.8
78.4
36-41 years old
42
10.5
89.0
42-47 years old
25
6.3
95.2
48-53 years old
7
1.8
97.0
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 440
www.rsisinternational.org
54-59 years old
10
2.5
99.5
60 years old and above
2
0.5
100
Total
399
100
Table shows the data of the range on the age of respondents. Among 399 respondents, there are 174 respondents
(4.3%) in aged between 18 to 23 years old which is the highest age group among the respondents. The
respondents who are aged between 24 to 29 years old consist of 88 respondents (22.1%). Besides, the range from
30 to 35 years old has 51 respondents (12.8%). There are 42 respondents who aged between 36 to 41 years old
(10.5%). The respondents in range age 42 to 47 years old is 25 respondents (6.3%). However, respondents who
are aged between 48 to 53 years old is 7 respondents only (1.8%). In range aged 54 to 59 years old, there has 10
respondents (2.5%). The rest are only 2 respondents (0.5%), which is who are aged 60 years old and above.
Table 8: Occupation
Frequency
Percent
Cumulative percent
Employed
156
39.1
39.1
Retire
6
1.5
40.6
Student
193
48.4
89
Unemployed
42
10.5
99.5
Others
2
0.5
100
Total
399
100
Table demonstrates occupation of respondents. Among the respondents, 156 employed (39.1%), while 2
respondents (0.5%) are others, the lowest group of occupation of respondents. There are total 6 respondents
(1.5%) are retire while 193 39.1, 39% 0.5, -1% 1.5, 2% 48.4, 48% 10.5, 11% Occupation Employed Others
Retire Student Unemployed50 respondents (48.4%) are students, which is the highest group of respondents’
occupation. The rest is an unemployed, there 42 respondents (10.5%).
Descriptive Statistics
Table 9: Descriptive Statistics
Independent Variable
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Standard Deviation
Awareness of Cyber Attacks
399
3.00
5.00
4.34
0.44
Awareness of Policies and
Regulations
399
2.80
5.00
4.38
0.38
Awareness of Multi-factor
Authentications
399
2.00
5.00
4.19
0.53
The descriptive statistics of each independent variable (awareness of cyber-attacks, awareness of policies and
regulations, awareness of multi-factor authentications). Based on the table, all the independent variables have
almost similar value of mean. Awareness of policies and regulations has the highest mean at 4.38 subsequently
followed by awareness of cyber-attacks at 4.34 and awareness of multi-factor authentication has lowest mean at
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 441
www.rsisinternational.org
4.19. From the table obtained, it can be clearly seen that majority of the respondents rated agree on the
questionnaire that the independent variables aware among digital banking users.
In contrast, standard deviation specifies how the data spread from the mean. From the study, awareness of multi-
factor authentications has the highest standard deviation at 0.53 followed by awareness of cyber-attacks at 0.44
while the lowest standard deviation is awareness of policies and regulations at 0.38. The standard deviation value
indicate that the data are not deviate from the mean.
Pearson’s Correlation Analysis
The relationship between awareness of cyber-attacks, awareness of policies and regulations, awareness of multi-
factor authentications with awareness of cyber security among digital banking user through Pearsons
Correlation Analysis. Pearson’s Correlation Analysis measures the strength of linear relationship between the
independent variables and dependent variable. Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient value ranges from +1 to -1. The
positive value represents positive correlation between the variables while negative value represents negative
correlation between the variables. The zero value of coefficient indicate that there is no association between the
variables. The value of Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient is denoted by r.
The table indicates significant correlations ranging from 0.714 to 0.489. Among the three independent variables,
knowledge of cyber-attack has the highest coefficient value of 0.714. The value reflects a significant positive
relationship between knowledge of cyber assault and awareness of cyber security. The p-values for all variables
are less than 0.01 at the significance level, and two asterisks at the two-tailed test indicate that there is a
statistically significant link.
Next, awareness of policies and regulations has the second highest correlation coefficient value, r at 0.600. It
indicates that has strong positive correlation with awareness of cyber security. Furthermore, the R-value of
awareness of multi-factor authentications is 0.489 which is clearly shows strong positive relationship between
awareness of multi-factor authentications and awareness of cyber security.
Therefore, there is significant relationship between independent variables which consist of awareness of cyber-
attacks, awareness of policies and regulations, awareness of multi-factor authentications and dependent variable
which is awareness of cyber security. Thus, the researcher conducts further analysis on the independent variables
with multiple linear regression analysis.
Multiple Linear Regression
The model summary from usage of multiple linear regression analysis where the results show the value of R is
0.856 which indicate all the three independent variables are highly correlated. The coefficient of determination,
R square is at 0.731 indicate that 73.1% of total variation in awareness of cyber security among digital banking
user can be explained by the independent variables (awareness of cyber-attack, awareness of policies and
regulations, and awareness of multi-factor authentications). The value of R Square is lower than 0.5 which is
considered a good value because there is high variance towards awareness of cyber security as the independent
variables in regression model. However, there is 26.9% remain unexplained in the variation. Hence, there are
other significant reasons of cyber security awareness among digital banking user not included for this research.
The significance value, p-value is 0.000 which is less than the alpha value, 0.05 is statistically significant. The
F-value is 358.143 is significant because when the F-value is higher, alternative hypotheses are well fit in the
model and accepted. Therefore, the significance of overall model is F (3,395) = 3858.143, p < 0.05. It shows that
overall multiple regression model is significant at 5% level of significant. Each independent variable in the
research has contribution in awareness of cyber security among digital banking user. Awareness of cyber attack
is the strongest predictor variable where β = 0.442, t (399) = 19.533, p < 0.05. The unstandardized beta, β also
has the highest value compared to other independent variables. It can be clearly seen that awareness of cyber
attack has the highest influence of positive relationship with cyber security awareness among digital banking
user.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 442
www.rsisinternational.org
Next, awareness of policies and regulations has subsequent stronger predictor where β = 0.299, t (399) = 11.157,
p = < 0.05. The unstandardized beta, β of awareness of policies and regulations is the second highest positive
value among the variables. From the result, awareness of policies and regulations is the second highest awareness
in cyber security awareness among digital banking users. Then, awareness of multi-factor authentications is the
lower predictor variable where β = 0.202, t (399) = 11.133. The unstandardized beta, β of awareness of multi-
factor authentications is the lowest positive among the variables. From the result, awareness of multi-factor
authentications has lowest positive value of all independent variables and is the third awareness in cyber security
awareness among digital banking users. Based on the result, each of the independent variable has different level
of contribution towards dependent variable and provide significant prediction towards cyber security awareness
among digital banking users. The relationship between dependent variable and independent variables can be
determined by the multiple regression equation.
Y = β
0
+ β
1
X
1
+ β
2
X
2
+…+
βiXi
Y : Dependent variable
β
0
: Intercept
βi : Slope for X
i
X : Independent variable
Figure 3: Equation of Multiple Regression Analysis
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
In previous chapter, the study had achieved the research objectives which are to identify the cyber security
awareness in digital banking, to measure the level of cyber security awareness of digital banking, and to examine
the most critical cyber security awareness in digital banking. The finding of this research is to have deeper
understanding about critical cyber security awareness in digital banking as there is increase in cyber-attack
victims among digital banking user in Malaysia. From the research, there are only three types of awareness are
being studied but the researcher believed that there are still other type of awareness that can influence user of
digital banking to aware on issues of cyber security.
The study had achieved the research objectives through literature review, Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient’s
analysis and Multiple Linear Regression analysis and test the hypothesis on the relationships on independent
variables (awareness of cyber-attack, awareness of policies and regulations, and awareness of multi-factor
authentications) aware about cyber security. In summary, awareness of cyber-attack, policies and regulations,
and multi-factor authentications among digital banking user is the most significant awareness for cyber security
awareness among digital banking users. The critical cyber security awareness in digital banking is crucial to
have in depth understanding on issues of cyber security among digital banking users to be aware about cyber
security. For user, they can increase awareness of their security in digital banking to avoid cybercrime in digital
banking. As the cybercrime rises, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) has made many measures to enhance cyber
security in digital banking to address these threats. Also, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) periodically holds
awareness programs to inform the public and financial institutions about the value of cyber security and how to
defend themselves from cyber-attacks.
For future research, this study proposed only consists of three independent variables (awareness of cyber-attacks,
awareness of policies and regulations, and awareness of multi-factor authentications). However, the researcher
believed that there is other cyber security awareness that can avoid from cybercrime in digital banking. The
future researchers may do qualitative research on digital banking studies to gain deeper insights on digital
banking user. Future researchers can increase the sample size of study to have generalization on digital banking
user. Based on the study of Amar Johri and Shailendra Kumar (2023), awareness of phishing attacks is one of
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 443
www.rsisinternational.org
the cyber security awareness among digital banking users. Therefore, it will be an awareness of cyber security
among digital banking users. Amar Johri and Shailendra Kumar (2023) also states that awareness of hacking
which includes cyber security awareness among digital banking. There, awareness of hacking can be used in
future research on digital banking studies.
REFERENCES
1. Alt, R., Beck, R., & Smits, M. T. (2018). Fintech and the transformation of the financial industry.
Electronic Markets, 28(3), 235–243.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0310-9
2. Alzoubi, H. M., Ghazal, T. M., Hasan, M. K., Alketbi, A., Kamran, R., Al-Dmour, N. A., & Islam, S.
(2022). Cyber security threats on Digital Banking. 2022 1st International Conference on AI in
Cybersecurity (ICAIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/icaic53980.2022.9896966
3. Ammirato, S., Sofo, F., Felicetti, A. M., & Raso, C. (2019). A methodology to support the adoption of
IOT innovation and its application to the Italian Bank branch security context. European Journal of
Innovation Management, 22(1), 146–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-03-2018-0058
4. Balbaa, M. E., Eshov, M. P., & Ismailova, N. (2022). The impacts of Russian ukrainian war on the global
economy in the frame of digital banking networks and cyber attacks. Proceedings of the 6th International
Conference on Future Networks &amp; Distributed Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584202.3584223
5. Bapat, D. (2021). Exploring the relationship between lifestyle, digital financial element and Digital
Financial Services experience. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(2), 297–320.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2020-0575
6. Barroso, M., & Laborda, J. (2022). Digital transformation and the emergence of the Fintech sector:
Systematic Literature Review. Digital Business, 2(2), 100028.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100028
7. Belke, A., & Beretta, E. (2020). From cash to central bank digital currencies and cryptocurrencies: A
balancing act between modernity and monetary stability. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(4), 911–938.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-07-2019-0311
8. Buja, A. G. (2021). Cyber Security Featuresfor National E-Learning policy. Turkish Journal of Computer
and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(5), 1729–1735.
https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.2169
9. Chandra sekhar, & Kumar, M. (2023). An overview of cyber security in digital banking sector. East Asian
Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 43–52.
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i1.1671
10. Chen, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Han, M., Siddula, M., & Cai, Z. (2022). A survey on blockchain systems:
Attacks, defenses, and Privacy Preservation. High-Confidence Computing, 2(2), 100048.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcc.2021.100048
11. Financial sector blueprint 2022-2026 Bank Negara Malaysia. (n.d.-i).
https://www.bnm.gov.my/publications/fsb3
12. Formosa, P., Wilson, M., & Richards, D. (2021). A Principlist Framework for cybersecurity ethics.
Computers & amp; Security, 109 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102382
13. Ghelani, D., Hua, T. K., & Koduru, S. K. (2022). Cyber Security Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Security
Solutions Models in Banking.
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.166385206.63311335/v1
14. Gogolin, F., Lim, I., & Vallascas, F. (2021). Cyberattacks on small banks and the impact on local banking
markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3823296
15. Gola, C., & Roselli, A. (2009). The UK Banking System and Its Regulatory and Supervisory Framework.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235779
16. Gulyás, O., & Kiss, G. (2023). Impact of cyber-attacks on the Financial Institutions. Procedia Computer
Science, 219, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.267
17. Guma, A. (n.d.). Development of a Secure Multi-Factor Authentication Algorithm for Mobile Money
Applications. https://doi.org/10.58694/1782
18. Jebarajakirthy, C., & Shankar, A. (2021). Impact of online convenience on mobile banking adoption
intention: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102323.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102323
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 444
www.rsisinternational.org
19. Johri, A., & Kumar, S. (2023a). Exploring customer awareness towards their cyber security in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A study in the era of Banking Digital Transformation. Human Behavior and
Emerging Technologies, 2023, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2103442
20. Kasri, R. A., Indrastomo, B. S., Hendranastiti, N. D., & Prasetyo, M. B. (2022). Digital payment and
banking stability in emerging economy with dual banking system. Heliyon, 8(11).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11198
21. Kulu, E., Opoku, A., Gbolonyo, E., & Tayi Kodwo, M. A. (2022). Mobile money transactions and
Banking Sector Performance in Ghana. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10761
22. Loaba, S. (2022). The impact of mobile banking services on saving behavior in West Africa.Global
Finance Journal, 53, 100620.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100620
23. Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2022). Internet banking adoption under technology acceptance model— evidence from
Cambodian users. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100224
24. Mai, P. T., & Tick, A. (2021). Cyber Security Awareness and behavior of youth in smartphone usage: A
comparative study between university students in Hungary and Vietnam. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica,
18(8), 67–89.
https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.18.8.2021.8.4
25. Mawudor, B. G., Kim, M.-H., & Park, M.-G. (2015). Continuous monitoring methods as a mechanism
for detection and mitigation of growing threats in banking security system. 2015 4th International
Conference on Interactive Digital Media (ICIDM). https://doi.org/10.1109/idm.2015.7516317
26. Mbama, C. I., & Ezepue, P. O. (2018). Digital Banking, customer experience and Bank Financial
Performance. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(2), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-11-
2016-0181
27. Md Haris Uddin Sharif, & Mehmood Ali Mohammed. (2022). A literature review of financial losses
statistics for Cyber Security and future trend. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 15(1),
138–156. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.1.0573
28. Mishra, A., Alzoubi, Y. I., Anwar, M. J., & Gill, A. Q. (2022). Attributes impacting cybersecurity policy
development: An evidence from Seven nations. Computers &amp; Security, 120, 102820.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2022.102820
29. Murthy, N., & Gopalkrishnan, S. (2022). Does openness increase vulnerability to digital frauds?
observing social media digital footprints to analyse risk and legal factors for Banks International Journal
of Law and Management, 64(4), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-04-2022-0081
30. Nie, J. (2008). Mobile Banking Information Security and Protection Methods. 2008 International
Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/csse.2008.1422
31. Nurse, J. R. C. (2021, February 28). Cybersecurity awareness. arXiv.org.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00474
32. Othman, R., Aris, N. A., Mardziyah, A., Zainan, N., & Amin, N. M. (2015). Fraud detection and
prevention methods in the Malaysian Public Sector: Accountants and internal auditors perceptions.
Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01082-5
33. Palmié, M., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Caglar, U. (2020). The evolution of the Financial Technology
Ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119779.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779
34. Patel, R., Migliavacca, M., & Oriani, M. E. (2022). Blockchain in banking and finance: A bibliometric
review. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101718.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101718
35. Prakash, R., Anoop, V. S., & Asharaf, S. (2022). Blockchain technology for cybersecurity: A text mining
literature analysis. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100112
36. Puente, F., Sandoval, J. D., Hernandez, P., & Molina, C. J. (2005). Improving online banking security
with hardware devices. Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security
Technology.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ccst.2005.1594874
37. Rastogi, S., Panse, C., Sharma, A., & Bhimavarapu, V. M. (2021). Unified payment interface (UPI): A
Digital Innovation and its impact on financial inclusion and Economic Development. Universal Journal
of Accounting and Finance, 9(3), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090326
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 445
www.rsisinternational.org
38. Rodrigues, A. R., Ferreira, F. A. F., Teixeira, F. J. C. S. N., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). Artificial
Intelligence, Digital Transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi- stakeholder
cognition-driven framework. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101616.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101616
39. Sanusi, Z. M., Rameli, M. N., & Isa, Y. M. (2015). Fraud schemes in the banking institutions: Prevention
measures to avoid severe financial loss. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 107–113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01088-6
40. Saripan, H., & Hamin, Z. (2011). The application of the digital signature law in securing internet banking:
Some preliminary evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 248–253.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.042
41. Shulha, O., Yanenkova, I., Kuzub, M., Muda, I., & Nazarenko, V. (2022). Banking Information Resource
Cybersecurity System Modeling. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,
8(2), 80.
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020080
42. Sileyew, K. J. (2019, August 7). Research design and methodology. IntechOpen.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68505
43. Sinigaglia, F., Carbone, R., Costa, G., & Zannone, N. (2020). A survey on multi-factor authentication for
online banking in the wild. Computers &amp; Security, 95, 101745.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101745
44. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of
Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
45. TN, N., & Shailendra Kulkarni, M. (2022). Zero click attacks a new cyber threat for the E- banking
sector. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-06-2022-0140
46. Vinod Ramchandra, M., Kumar, K., Sarkar, A., Kr. Mukherjee, S., & Agarwal, K. (2022). Assessment of
the impact of blockchain technology in the banking industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, 56, 2221–
2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.554
47. Wahid, S. D., Buja, A. G., Jono, M. N., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Assessing the influential factors of
cybersecurity awareness in Malaysia during the pandemic outbreak: A structural equation modeling.
International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration, 8(74), 73–81.
https://doi.org/10.19101/ijatee.2020.s1762116
48. Widyadhana, A. N., Handayani, P. W., & Larasati, P. D. (2022). Influence of technological, social, and
individual factors on security and privacy take-up of Digital Banking. 2022 International Conference on
Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech).
https://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech55957.2022.9915231
49. Williamson, J., & Curran, K. (2023, April 28). The role of multi-factor authentication for Modern Day
Security. Semiconductor Science and Information Devices.
https://journals.bilpubgroup.com/index.php/ssid/article/view/3152
50. Wodo, W., Blaskiewicz, P., Stygar, D., & Kuzma, N. (2021). Evaluating the security of electronic and
mobile banking. Computer Fraud &amp; Security, 2021(10), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-
3723(21)00107-x
51. Yildirim, N., & Varol, A. (2019). A research on security vulnerabilities in online and Mobile Banking
Systems. 2019 7th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS).
https://doi.org/10.1109/isdfs.2019.8757495
52. Zahiroh, M. Y. (2020). Cybersecurity awareness and digital skills on readiness for change in digital
banking. Li Falah: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 5(2), 53.
https://doi.org/10.31332/lifalah.v5i2.2271