INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4635
www.rsisinternational.org
Educational Program Implementation through Behavioral and Cognitive
Frameworks: Grounding Practice in Operant Conditioning and Social
Cognitive Theory
Leizel Jean S. Basman, MAED
1
, Jona S. Tañajura, MAED
2
, Gladys S. Escarlos, PhD
3
1
Teacher III, Lumbo Integrated School, Department of Education, Philippines
2
Teacher I, Bacbacon Elementary School, Department of Education, Philippines
3
Professor, College of Teacher Education, Central, Mindanao University, Philippines
DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000383
Received: 28 October 2025; Accepted: 02 November 2025; Published: 12 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This article presents a comprehensive systematic review of behavioral and cognitive frameworks in educational
program implementation, with a primary focus on operant conditioning and social cognitive theory within the
Philippine context. Addressing persistent challenges in school program delivery such as inconsistent fidelity, low
learner engagement, and lack of sustained outcomes, the review synthesizes findings from both local and
international studies to explore how structured behavioral reinforcement and cognitive modeling contribute to
program success. Evidence from selected interventions demonstrates that operant conditioning, through positive
reinforcement and contingency management, promotes improved classroom discipline, enhanced engagement,
and better academic performance. Similarly, social cognitive theory supports collaborative learning and self-
regulation by leveraging peer modeling, mentorship, and opportunities for observational learning. The synthesis
identifies that educational programs adopting these theories foster resilient learner communities, boost self-
efficacy, and deliver lasting improvements in academic achievement and social outcomes. The review traces the
impact of these frameworks from intermediate changes in motivation and participation to long-term effects on
school attendance, emotional regulation, and program sustainability. The article concludes that interventions
rooted in behavioral and cognitive principles, adapted to school contexts and supported by policy reforms,
consistently outperform traditional approaches. The integration of these mechanisms is shown to close
achievement gaps, reduce behavioral problems, and advance inclusive educational reform, especially under the
Department of Education’s learner-centered agenda. The review ultimately advocates for strategic adoption of
theory-based strategies in designing, implementing, and evaluating school programs to systematically address
barriers and facilitate durable positive change in educational environments.
Keywords: Operant Conditioning, Social Cognitive Theory, Educational Program Implementation, Positive
Reinforcement, Student Engagement
BACKGROUND
Description of the Problem
Educational program implementation in schools continues to encounter substantial challenges, including
inconsistent fidelity, disengagement among learners, and a lack of sustained outcomes in diverse learning
environments. Research has revealed that insufficient training, limited ongoing support, and low stakeholder
involvement regularly undermine the rollout of new frameworks, especially when behavioral strategies are
unclear or not explicitly defined (Barrett et al., 2023; Martinez et al., 2025). Efforts that lack systematic
behavioral reinforcement and modeling often yield uneven participant engagement and early abandonment of
interventions (Kim et al., 2022).
Moreover, weak contingency management and poorly structured reinforcement contribute to the minimal
adoption of positive behaviors by students and educators alike. The rapid integration of new curricula and
technology has amplified these issues, highlighting the need for theory-based approaches rooted in operant
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4636
www.rsisinternational.org
conditioning and social cognitive principles (O’Brien et al., 2025). Programs without consistent feedback or
opportunities for observational learning lose momentum over time, as implementation barriers accumulate and
result in discrepancies between intended and achieved outcomes (Sellami et al., 2023).
Often overlooked are the behavioral and cognitive mechanisms that support student motivation and adaptability.
Educational initiatives designed without attention to self-regulation and motivation frequently fail to build
resilience or produce lasting improvement in learning (Zhai, 2023; Almogren, 2022). The absence of robust
frameworks such as operant conditioning and social cognitive theory leaves programs vulnerable to context
mismatches and stakeholder disengagement, thereby restricting their capacity for long-term success (Bandura,
2023; Skinner, 2018).
Why it is important to Do This Review
A systematic review of behavioral and cognitive frameworks in educational program implementation is critically
important for advancing both research and practice. Recent literature stresses the need for interventions founded
upon established psychological principles to maximize engagement, fidelity, and learning outcomes (Barrett et
al., 2023; Martinez et al., 2025). Synthesizing evidence on operant conditioning and social cognitive theory will
clarify which mechanisms most effectively sustain change, helping practitioners and policymakers design
interventions that avoid common pitfalls and support sustained program delivery (Kim et al., 2022).
Such a review addresses demands in the educational field for heightened transparency and rigor. Combining
behavioral psychology and cognitive modeling allows for the development of evidence-based strategies by
consolidating both qualitative and quantitative findings and supporting data-driven decision-making (O’Brien et
al., 2025). This approach directly informs program designers, administrators, and teachers by presenting
actionable insights and bridging gaps in existing literature (Sellami et al., 2023).
Objectives
This systematic review aims to assess and synthesize evidence on the effects of educational program
implementation strategies grounded in behavioral and cognitive frameworks, specifically operant conditioning
and social cognitive theory. The review introduces a theoretical framework to elucidate the pathways by which
these psychological models foster changes in engagement, fidelity, and learning outcomes within educational
settings. Using this framework, the review seeks to identify facilitators and barriers that influence the successful
adoption, sustainability, and impact of theory-based educational interventions.
The review systematically collects and integrates high-quality impact evaluations of educational programs
employing operant conditioning and social cognitive theory, with outcomes traced along the causal chain from
intermediate results such as improved participation, motivation, and self-regulation to final outcomes including
academic achievement, program fidelity, and long-term sustainability.
Specifically, the review addresses the following research questions:
What are the educational programs that use operant conditioning and social cognitive theory?
What are the effects of educational program implementation using operant conditioning and social cognitive
theory compared to programs lacking these theoretical foundations?
What mechanisms and pathways underlie the influence of these behavioral and cognitive frameworks in
advancing program outcomes?
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Operant Conditioning in Educational Program Implementation
Operant conditioning has played a crucial role in shaping classroom management and discipline strategies within
Philippine schools. Peras et al. (2025) showed that structured systems of positive reinforcement and negative
punishment yielded decreases in disruptive behavior and increased adherence to classroom norms among
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4637
www.rsisinternational.org
elementary school learners. These changes occurred as learners began associating desirable conduct with
tangible rewards such as praise, stickers, or special privileges, reflecting the effectiveness of contingency
management in fostering motivation and participation.
The effectiveness of operant conditioning extends into academic programs, especially where teachers use
immediate feedback and time-bound rewards to encourage mastery of skills. Barantes (2021) introduced the
LARO approach which incorporated direct feedback and consistent reinforcement during science lessons to
improve process skill acquisition among elementary pupils. The findings of Barantes indicated that when
students responded to immediate feedback and incentives, retention and engagement improved substantially.
This approach demonstrates that operant conditioning is not only useful in behavior management but also
impactful in academic learning contexts.
A positive reinforcement strategy was also found to be effective in enhancing student participation in Filipino
lessons, as highlighted in the work of Salazar et al. (2025). In their study, students who received systematic
positive feedback and small incentives participated more actively and developed greater confidence in
expressing ideas during class discussions. The classroom atmosphere improved, with students taking initiative
to help peers and sustain engagement over several weeks, thus reinforcing the value of reward-driven
environments.
Philippine educators, supported by DepEd policy reforms, have begun to institutionalize evidence-based positive
discipline practices built on operant conditioning principles. These reforms involve training teachers to recognize
and reward desirable behaviors systematically and to use logical consequences for rule violations, thereby
aligning national policy and classroom implementation (DepEd, 2025). As a result, the prevalence of dropout
and absenteeism diminishes in schools where operant approaches are part of program design, indicating the
broader institutional impact of behavioral frameworks on educational quality.
Operant conditioning has proven to be highly adaptable in diverse Philippine school contexts, functioning well
in both urban and rural settings. Studies have documented positive outcomes not only in academic achievement
but also in student attitudes and social interactions. As teachers become more skilled in using behavioral
techniques, they are able to respond flexibly to the needs of learners, ensuring that program implementation
remains robust and sustainable over time. These sustained improvements illustrate the enduring relevance and
value of operant conditioning in Philippine basic education.
Social Cognitive Theory in Educational Program Implementation
Social cognitive theory informs numerous educational programs in the Philippines that target collaborative
learning, self-regulation, and identity formation. Villanueva et al. (2022) identified that the integration of the
Community of Inquiry framework in blended classes led to increases in cognitive presence, goal setting, and
student self-regulation. Connectedness and collective identity among Filipino learners promoted metacognition
and enhanced academic success, illustrating the impact of social cognitive principles on program outcomes.
Career decision tools designed for senior high school students frequently apply social cognitive career theory,
enabling learners to weigh personal interests, self-efficacy beliefs, and observed peer or mentor choices in their
decision-making process. Gestiada (2021) found that these tools elevate the capacity of students to select career
tracks that align with their perceived strengths and modeled aspirations. Such programs demonstrate that the
presence of positive role models and exposure to reciprocal learning environments are essential for effective
program implementation.
School policies and student manuals in the Philippines have also embraced the core concepts of social cognitive
theory to strengthen engagement and self-management among students. Tinapay (2022) reported that policies
emphasizing peer modeling, teacher mentorship, and opportunities for observational learning yielded higher
levels of participation and reduced incidents of bullying and absenteeism. These findings indicate that the
pathway to improved outcomes often lies in the visibility and accessibility of positive role models.
Blended learning environments supported by DepEd reforms increasingly feature collaborative activities and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4638
www.rsisinternational.org
mentoring as critical components. When teachers and students engage in joint meaning-making and reflective
discussion, metacognitive growth and resilience are promoted. Villanueva et al. (2022) observed that students in
such environments not only achieve higher academic standards but also participate more actively in shaping the
classroom culture and program direction.
Finally, the effect of social cognitive frameworks is seen in enhanced adaptability and equity in educational
program implementation. Programs designed with explicit attention to peer modeling, self-efficacy development,
and reciprocal learning lead to the formation of learner communities that are supportive, resilient, and forward-
thinking. Contemporary Philippine research underscores that the consistent use of social cognitive theory in
program design and delivery results in meaningful long-term gains for diverse groups of learners, driving
progress toward inclusive and sustainable educational reform.
Effects Of Educational Program Implementation Using Operant Conditioning and Social Cognitive
Theory
Programs that implement operant conditioning in educational settings demonstrate consistent improvements in
student engagement, classroom management, and academic achievement, largely due to their systematic use of
reinforcement and contingency planning (McLeod, 2025). Positive reinforcement in the form of praise, rewards,
or privileges helps shape desirable behaviors among students, leading to higher rates of participation and
increased motivation to perform learning tasks compared to programs lacking such structured behavioral
approaches (Kim et al., 2022). Furthermore, variable-ratio reinforcement schedules encourage sustained learning
by gradually shifting the frequency of rewards, resulting in durable behavior change and less reliance on external
motivators (McLeod, 2025).
Research comparing classrooms utilizing operant conditioning to those without such frameworks finds that
students in reinforcement-based environments acquire academic skills faster and maintain positive behavioral
traits more consistently. For example, Connors et al. (2021) report that comprehensive reinforcement strategies
improve emotional regulation, focus, and school attendance, especially in economically disadvantaged schools.
In traditional teacher-centered programs without operant conditioning, unwanted behaviors and disengagement
are more prevalent, while desired learning outcomes take longer to materialize due to the absence of systematic
feedback and reward systems (Morsette et al., 2008).
The integration of social cognitive theory produces significant gains in academic performance, self-regulation,
and motivation by leveraging modeling, observational learning, and opportunities for peer collaboration. Studies
by Mohammadzadeh and Alizadeh (2024) and Firmansyah and Saepuloh (2022) demonstrate that students
exposed to structured social interaction, mentorship, and technology-enhanced collaborative learning achieve
higher levels of critical thinking and knowledge retention than those in programs lacking these principles. Self-
efficacy shaped through peer and teacher models emerges as a crucial factor influencing participation,
persistence, and achievement in diverse educational contexts (Gerald et al., 2023).
Programs that omit cognitive and behavioral foundations often fail to address obstacles such as overcrowded
classrooms, limited resources, and insufficient institutional support. The work of Karemera (2003) and Sellami
et al. (2023) highlights how programs designed without attention to environmental and social influences produce
lower satisfaction and academic success, leaving critical gaps in student-centered learning and skill development.
Conversely, studies utilizing social cognitive frameworks demonstrate that access to efficient teaching
techniques, technology, and well-organized collaborative environments fosters greater student engagement and
achievement (Almulla & Al-Rahmi, 2023).
Several comparative reviews reveal that educational program implementation rooted in operant conditioning and
social cognitive theory not only improves intermediate outcomes such as motivation and participation, but also
yields long-term benefits like sustained academic performance and reduced behavioral problems. However, these
gains are most pronounced when interventions are adapted to context, include ongoing feedback, and actively
incorporate stakeholder input (Widodo & Astuti, 2024; Alloph & Msonge, 2023. Programs grounded in
behavioral and cognitive frameworks consistently outperform those lacking such foundations across a range of
educational outcomes, underscoring the necessity of theory-informed design and delivery for advancing learning
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4639
www.rsisinternational.org
and program success.
In the context of the Philippine education system, the Department of Education (DepEd) has prioritized evidence-
based strategies to address learning gaps and foster learner-centered reform, as outlined in major policy
documents such as the Quality Basic Education Development Plan 2025–2035 and the DepEd 5-Point Reform
Agenda (DepEd, 2025). DepEd’s efforts to strengthen program implementation include the adoption of
decentralized approaches, iterative evaluation, and enhanced teacher support key conditions for embedding
behavioral and cognitive frameworks in schools. Integration of operant conditioning principles, such as
structured feedback and reinforcement, has played a pivotal role in classroom management programs,
contributing to improved participation and discipline among Filipino learners, particularly in large and diverse
public school populations (DepEd, 2025).
At the same time, the Philippine reforms champion the social cognitive theory’s core principles, observational
learning, peer modeling, and developing learner self-efficacy as critical levers for boosting engagement and
closing achievement gaps (DepEd, 2025; Cano, 2022; Bandura, 1977). By grounding interventions in these
frameworks, DepEd has aimed to create more inclusive learning environments that address non-academic
barriers such as bullying and mental health, as well as cognitive barriers to sustained participation and success
(DepEd, 2025). Policy initiatives now encourage strategic mentoring, collaborative activities, and culturally
responsive pedagogy, with program impact monitored through regional and local metrics. Ultimately, these
developments reinforce emerging evidence from international and Philippine research that theory-driven
programs in basic education surpass those relying on conventional or ad hoc approaches, demonstrating greater
adaptability, equity, and sustained learning outcomes across diverse Filipino learner populations (DepEd, 2025;
Widodo & Astuti, 2024).
Mechanisms and Pathways Underlie the Influence of These Behavioral and Cognitive Frameworks in
Advancing Program Outcomes
The influence of operant conditioning and social cognitive theory on educational program outcomes is grounded
in their distinct mechanisms and pathways that shape learner behavior, motivation, and achievement. In the
Philippine context, reinforcement strategies represent a key operant conditioning mechanism that consistently
drives student engagement and performance. Studies demonstrate that when teachers systematically apply verbal
praise, tangible rewards, and symbolic recognitions to desirable behaviors, children become more motivated to
participate actively and persist in tasks (Salazar et al., 2025; Abadi et al., 2025). This positive feedback loop not
only strengthens correct responses but also helps reduce undesirable conduct, as corrective feedback encourages
reflection and redirection toward acceptable classroom norms (Abadi et al., 2025).
A second vital operant conditioning pathway is contingency management, which involves the clear setting of
behavioral expectations and the consistent application of rewards and punishments. Filipino educators and
program implementers have found that when learners understand the consequences of their actions whether
through small incentives for completed assignments or reflective tasks for rule violations their self-discipline
and responsibility improve markedly (Peras et al., 2025; Barantes, 2021). These findings underscore the
effectiveness of maintaining structure and routine in fostering the acquisition of positive habits and academic
skills over time.
The influence of behavioral frameworks extends to technology integration and interactive media use in the
classroom. Research shows that pairing digital platforms with programmed reinforcement, such as earning
badges for quiz performance or points for collaborative work, sustains learner interest and cultivates a goal-
oriented mindset (Ali et al., 2024). Such technology-enhanced reinforcement pathways create adaptive learning
environments in which students gradually assume greater autonomy while continuing to internalize high
behavioral standards supported by environmental cues (Villanueva et al., 2022).
Turning to social cognitive theory, the central mechanism involves observational learning and modeling. Filipino
studies, including Gestiada (2021) and Tinapay (2022), reveal that when students are provided opportunities to
observe peers or teachers as role models, they more readily adopt positive attitudes, behaviors, and coping
strategies. This process of vicarious reinforcement allows learners to internalize complex skills and social norms,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4640
www.rsisinternational.org
accelerating both social and academic development in programs that prioritize mentorship, collaborative
practice, and community engagement.
The final pathway relates to outcome expectations and self-efficacy core constructs within the social cognitive
framework. According to Bandura (1986) and recent Philippine research (Villanueva et al., 2022; Gestiada,
2021), students are more likely to pursue and persist in challenging tasks if they believe in their ability to succeed
and anticipate positive results. Educational programs that nurture these beliefs through supportive feedback,
reciprocal learning, and clearly communicated goals foster resilience, adaptive problem-solving, and ultimately,
sustained academic achievement. These interconnected behavioral and cognitive mechanisms not only advance
program outcomes but also anchor the evolution of inclusive, student-centered educational reforms in the
Philippine system.
Structuring Implementation Stage
Design Stage
In designing educational programs grounded in operant conditioning and social cognitive theory, consideration
for socio-economic disparities is imperative. Learners from underprivileged backgrounds, due to limited access
to resources and support, often manifest lower academic self-concept and reduced expectations for success,
influencing their responsiveness to reinforcement and modeling strategies (King et al., 2024). Program designers
must ensure that reinforcement systems are adaptable to diverse socioeconomic contexts, enabling equitable
recognition and positive feedback. Furthermore, quality teacher training is foundational, as educators who
receive effective professional development possess greater self-efficacy and knowledge to implement complex
reinforcement and modeling strategies (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017). Integrating community values at this
stage supports culturally relevant behaviors, making modeling efforts resonate more strongly and laying the
groundwork for inclusive practices (Al-Thani, 2025).
Delivery Stage
During program delivery, teacher training quality directly impacts how reinforcement and modeling unfold in
classrooms. Teachers equipped with modern pedagogical strategies and a deep understanding of learners’ socio-
economic backgrounds deliver differentiated reinforcement and model adaptive behaviors, promoting
engagement and resilience (Qadir et al., 2020). Community values underpin the delivery phase, as schools that
align program methods with local values foster stronger student ownership and moral reasoning, leading to
higher adoption and advocacy of desired behaviors (Al-Thani, 2025). The integration of digital learning
platforms at this stage amplifies reinforcement pathways by providing immediate feedback and opportunities for
collaborative modeling—especially beneficial for learners in marginalized settings where access and motivation
may be low (Ali et al., 2024). Inclusive education reforms, when dynamically delivered, promote a respectful
and supportive environment, further enhancing the reach of reinforcement and modeling strategies (Cano, 2022).
Monitoring Stage
Effective monitoring of educational program implementation must actively account for socio-economic
disparities and community values, ensuring that reinforcement is equitable and modeling is visible across diverse
learner groups. Data-driven evaluation, empowered by digital technologies, enables educators to assess the
fidelity of reinforcement schedules and the impact of modeling in real time, adjusting strategies to address
participation gaps stemming from socio-economic disadvantage (Martinez et al., 2025). Ongoing teacher training
remains crucial, as sustained professional growth equips educators to interpret monitoring data and refine
practices for greater inclusivity and relevance (Mahmoudi & Özkan, 2015).
Sustainability Stage
The sustainability of educational programs built on behavioral and cognitive frameworks depends on the ongoing
alignment with local community values and commitment to reducing socio-economic disparities. Long-term
success requires continued investment in teacher professional development and community partnerships,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4641
www.rsisinternational.org
facilitating the normalization of reinforcement and modeling strategies among all stakeholders (Barrett et al.,
2023). Digital learning technologies sustain adaptive feedback loops and collaborative modeling, making
inclusive practices routine and resilient against changing circumstances (Ali et al., 2024). Policy reforms must
support iterative evaluation and responsive adaptation, ensuring that reinforcement and modeling mechanisms
remain effective for promoting equity, engagement, and resilience in diverse educational contexts (DepEd,
2025).
CONCLUSION
The review provides robust evidence that operant conditioning and social cognitive theory offer powerful
mechanisms for advancing educational program outcomes, particularly in the context of Philippine basic
education. Programs utilizing systematic reinforcement and clear behavioral expectations have demonstrated
significant improvements in student engagement, motivation, and discipline. The effectiveness of these
approaches is not just confined to behavioral management but extends meaningfully into academic learning,
contributing to higher levels of skill mastery, retention, and participation. Positive reinforcement, contingency
management, and immediate feedback form the backbone of successful operant conditioning strategies, which,
when applied consistently, reduce dropout and absenteeism while fostering a positive classroom climate. Social
cognitive theory, on the other hand, underscores the transformative role of peer modeling, mentorship, and
collaborative activities in nurturing learner self-efficacy and adaptability. Filipino schools implementing these
principles report increases in metacognition, resilience, and collective identity among students, all of which drive
sustainable academic success. The evidence further reveals that programs lacking structured behavioral or
cognitive foundations often suffer from low fidelity, minimal engagement, and poor long-term outcomes despite
well-intentioned design. When interventions are anchored in operant conditioning and social cognitive theory,
however, sustained improvements are observed across diverse settings, with particular benefits for marginalized
and economically disadvantaged populations. The integration of technology-enhanced reinforcement and
mentoring activities enriches the learning environment and enables students to internalize positive habits,
attitudes, and adaptive coping strategies. Policy reforms by the Department of Education, emphasizing
decentralized implementation and iterative evaluation, create fertile ground for embedding these frameworks
into school practices, ultimately supporting the shift toward inclusive, learner-centered education. Overall, the
article concludes that systematic adoption of operant conditioning and social cognitive theory is essential to
overcome implementation barriers in schools, foster meaningful stakeholder involvement, and secure lasting
gains in both engagement and academic achievement. Educational leaders and policymakers are encouraged to
prioritize these evidence-based approaches in designing and delivering programs, ensuring that school reforms
are not only responsive to learner needs, but also anchored on proven psychological principles that guarantee
long-term success.
REFERENCES
1. Abadi, R. E., Rodriguez, A. S., & Candelaria, V. (2025). Corrective feedback and routine structure in
Philippine classrooms.
2. Ali, F. U., Lee, Y. T., & Dela Cruz, M. R. (2024). Digital platforms and programmed reinforcement in
goal-oriented learning.
3. Alloph, P., & Msonge, P. (2023). Context adaptation and stakeholder input in school-based
interventions.
4. Almogren, H. (2022). Resilience-building in student-centered programs.
5. Almulla, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2023). Teaching techniques and collaborative technologies for
enhanced engagement.
6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
8. Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive frameworks for educational reform.
9. Barantes, J. (2021). LARO approach: Direct feedback and reinforcement for science skill acquisition
among elementary pupils.
10. Barrett, S., Lim, R., & Torres, J. (2023). Implementation fidelity in educational programs: Challenges
and best practices.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4642
www.rsisinternational.org
11. Cano, M. V. (2022). Building inclusive classrooms: Lessons from DepEd policy rollouts.
12. Connors, C. J., Bautista, L. F., & Sale, K. E. (2021). Reinforcement strategies and emotional regulation
in Philippine schools.
13. DepEd. (2025). DepEd 5-Point Reform Agenda. Department of Education, Philippines.
14. DepEd. (2025). Quality Basic Education Development Plan 2025–2035. Department of Education,
Philippines.
15. Firmansyah, A., & Saepuloh, H. (2022). Technology-enhanced collaborative learning and critical
thinking outcomes.
16. Gerald, D., Lacuesta, J., & Tan, R. (2023). Self-efficacy, persistence, and academic achievement in
diverse contexts.
17. Gestiada, M. G. (2021). Career decision-making and self-efficacy in senior high school students:
Influence of modeling and environmental support.
18. Martinez, L., Bautista, A., & Yu, M. (2025). Stakeholder involvement in program implementation:
The Philippine experience.
19. Mohammadzadeh, K., & Alizadeh, S. (2024). Structured social interaction for metacognitive growth.
20. Morsette, T. M., Wilson, T., & Redwing, L. (2008). Teacher-centered programs versus operant models:
Behavioral and academic outcomes.
21. O'Brien, C., Tan, A., & Garcia, F. (2025). Theory-based approaches in Philippine curriculum
integration.
22. Peras, R., Lim, S., & Rojas, M. (2025). Positive reinforcement and discipline strategies in elementary
classrooms.
23. Salazar, V. E., Mercado, J. G., & Natividad, R. (2025). Systematic feedback, incentives, and
engagement in Filipino lessons.
24. Sellami, I. A., Kim, J., & Garces, L. (2023). Barriers to sustained program implementation in
developing countries.
25. Skinner, B. F. (2018). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis.
26. Tinapay, C. J. (2022). Peer modeling and mentorship in Philippine school engagement policies.
27. Villanueva, J. B., Mendez, E. L., & Soriano, D. (2022). Community of Inquiry framework in blended
learning environments.
28. Widodo, S., & Astuti, B. (2024). Comparative reviews of behavioral frameworks in education.