INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4732
Addressing the Challenges of Using Teaching Aids in Primary
School Classrooms
Mabia Momen, Tanusri Aich
Prime University, Bangladesh
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000390
Received: 20 August 2025; Accepted: 28 August 2025; Published: 13 November 2025
ABSTRACT
An aid refers to a tool, device, or object essential for carrying out a task. A teaching aid is specifically used for
instructional purposes in the classroom. This study sought to identify and examine the particular challenges
teachers face when using teaching aids in the classroom. A qualitative design and interview method were used
to address the research questions. Data were gathered from ten purposively selected schools and a simple
random sample of twenty teachers from those schools from Dhaka and Satkhira. In-depth, one-on-one
interviews with primary teachers served as the primary data collection tool, and thematic analysis was
employed. Ten themes emerged from the analysis. The findings indicate that, despite teachersmotivation to
use teaching aids, they encounter multiple challenges. These challenges were grouped into two categories.
Internal classroom challenges include teachers' reluctance, large class size, inadequate time management,
limited ICT skills, heavy workload, and lack of lesson preparation. External challenges encompass poor
storage systems, insufficient provision of suitable teaching aids, weak supervision and monitoring, inadequate
school facilities and resources, and government policy. The study recommends strategies such as fostering a
professional mindset, investing in teacher training, revising government policy on teaching aids, improving
teacher recruitment, and enhancing supervision and monitoring.
Keywords: Teaching Aids, Primary Education, Classroom Challenges, Classroom Instruction
INTRODUCTION
Primary education is the foundation upon which all other levels of learning are built. It plays a vital role in
shaping both individual lives and the overall progress of a nation. When this foundation is weak, it not only
hampers personal development but also slows down a country’s social and economic growth.
As Barber and Mourshed (2007) point out, the quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its
teachers,” and the only way to improve outcomes is to improve instruction” (as cited in Scheerens, 2010).
Likewise, Bruner (1966) explains learning as a process where teaching helps learners form patterns of ideas
similar to those already held by the teacher. These ideas clearly show how central teachers are to the success of
the education system.
In Bangladesh, the Directorate of Primary Education reports that there are about 322,766 public primary school
teachers. They are required to complete a one-and-a-half-year pre-service program known as the Diploma in
Primary Education (DipEd), which is conducted by Primary Teachers’ Training Institutes (PTIs). Beyond this,
various professional development programs are available. For instance, under the Primary Education
Development Program (PEDP-3), 58,752 head teachers have received training, 79,540 teachers have taken part
in School Help Activity training, and 34,912 teachers along with 400 officials have been trained in ICT in
Education. Teachers also receive subject-based and need-based in-service training.
However, despite these extensive training opportunities, concerns about the overall quality of teaching still
remain. Many teachers find it difficult to apply what they learn in training to their real classroom situations.
This gap between training and classroom practice creates an imbalance in the teachinglearning process and
continues to challenge the quality of primary education in Bangladesh.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4733
Research problem:
Challenges faced by primary school teachers in implementing teaching aids in their classroom.
Statement of the Problem
Primary education is considered the foundation of all levels of learning, and its quality largely depends on the
effectiveness of teaching and learning practices in the classroom. Teaching aids are essential tools that help
bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical understanding, especially when students are
introduced to abstract subjects like mathematics or science. Proper use of teaching aids enhances students’
attention, motivation, and comprehension, contributing to more meaningful learning outcomes.
In Bangladesh, primary school teachers receive various forms of professional training aimed at improving
classroom instruction, including programs on the effective use of teaching aids. These trainings are provided
through the Diploma in Primary Education (DipEd) and other initiatives such as School Help Activity and ICT
in Education under the Primary Education Development Program (PEDP-3). Despite these initiatives, there
remains a significant disparity between what teachers learn during training and what they actually practice in
the classroom.
Many teachers either refrain from using teaching aids or fail to use them effectively. This reluctance may stem
from multiple factors such as lack of resources, time constraints, inadequate institutional support, or limited
motivation. As a result, the intended benefits of teaching aids are not fully realized in primary classrooms.
Phillips and Burbules (2000) emphasize that “research seeks to develop relevant true statementsones that
can serve to explain the situation that is of concern or that describe the causal relationships of interest. Guided
by this notion, the present study seeks to identify and explain the challenges that primary-level teachers face in
using teaching aids in real classroom situations. Understanding these challenges will provide insights that can
help policymakers, educational administrators, and teacher training institutions develop more practical and
sustainable strategies to enhance the use of teaching aids in primary education.
Research Questions:
1. What are the challenges that faced by the teachers of primary schools in using teaching aids in classroom?
2. What are the reasons behind facing these problems?
LITERATURE REVIEW
Teaching aids are essential tools used to enhance the teaching and learning process by making instruction more
engaging, concrete, and understandable. The term aid refers to a tool, appliance, or object that supports the
performance of a specific action. Therefore, a teaching aid is any aid used for instructional purposes within the
classroom context.
Romiszowski (1968, p.11) postulates that a teaching aid must, as the name suggests, aid the teaching of a
topic. It does not do the whole job. Other methods perform parts of the job and the aid is administered and
controlled by the teacher.” Teaching aids, therefore, serve as supplementary tools that represent or simulate
reality to support understanding. They allow students to visualize and connect with abstract ideas through
tangible examples. For instance, rather than using a real wall clock to teach the concept of time, a teacher may
use a cardboard model with movable hands. Such aids help students reason, explore, and make deductions
independently, while stimulating their curiosity and desire to learn.
Similarly, Szendrei (1996) defines teaching and learning aids as concrete materialsreal-life tools and
artifacts commonly used in non-school settingsas well as artificial materials and games, including puzzles,
that are specifically designed for educational purposes. According to Szendrei, the choice of concrete materials
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4734
largely depends on a school’s educational philosophy and its understanding of how learners construct
knowledge and develop conceptual understanding.
Lipinskienė (2001) extends this view by defining the educational environment as a dynamic teaching and
learning space shaped by the educator and guided by educational goals, content, and methods that foster active
engagement with learning materials. This highlights the importance of a supportive classroom environment in
maximizing the benefits of teaching aids.
In Bangladesh, several studies have examined teacher preparation, training, and classroom practices in relation
to instructional quality. Rashid and Ritu (2013), in their study Teachers’ Professional Preparation, Income, Job
Satisfaction and Performance: An Exploratory Study, found that the majority of primary teachers had received
formal training, such as the Certificate in Education (C-in-Ed) program. Their study collected data on teachers’
backgrounds, teaching-learning practices, job satisfaction, and professional expectations, revealing that
government and semi-government school teachers had greater access to professional training and facilities than
their counterparts in other institutions.
Beyond training, teacher well-being also influences classroom effectiveness. Terada (2018) reported that
elementary teachers in Missouri experience high levels of occupational stress, which negatively affects their
physical and emotional health as well as students’ learning outcomes. However, the study also noted that stress
can be alleviated when schools provide adequate emotional and professional support to teachers.
Eison (2010) emphasized the importance of active learning strategies in creating excitement and engagement
in classrooms. His research showed that stimulating curiosity and enthusiasm in learners enhances the quality
of teaching and learning. Nonetheless, both teachers and students face barriers that limit the effectiveness of
such strategies, including lack of resources and institutional supportissues also relevant to the context of
Bangladesh.
Socioeconomic disparities further compound these challenges. Schools located in urban centers like Dhaka
tend to be better resourced and have access to various teaching aids, whereas rural schools often face acute
shortages of materials and even basic infrastructure such as electricity. A report by Sarker, Ohiduzzaman,
Islam, and Hassan (2017) from the National Academy for Primary Education (NAPE) identified several
barriers to the effective use of ICT and teaching aids, including insufficient training periods, lack of practice
opportunities, unavailability or malfunction of equipment, and inadequate institutional support.
Dr. Md. Abdul Halim (2011), in his study A Comparative Study of Mathematics Curriculum at Primary Level
in Bangladesh and India (West Bengal), compared the objectives, content, and implementation of the
mathematics curriculum between the two regions. Using document analysis, classroom observations, and
surveys of teachers and academic supervisors, he found significant differences in curriculum objectives and
content presentation. The study also highlighted persistent challenges in Bangladesh, such as large class sizes,
low teacher-student ratios, limited contact hours, and inadequate skill development in mathematics. These
factors collectively hinder the effective integration of teaching aids into classroom instruction.
Overall, the reviewed literature emphasizes that while teaching aids and teacher training are crucial for
improving instructional quality, several interrelated factorsincluding limited resources, ineffective training
practices, and institutional constraintscontinue to obstruct their effective use in primary education. This
study, therefore, builds on these insights to further explore the specific challenges that primary school teachers
face in utilizing teaching aids within the Bangladeshi classroom context.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study followed a qualitative research approach employing both purposive and simple random sampling
methods. To fulfill the purpose of the study, an interview-based design was adopted, allowing for in-depth
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4735
exploration of the experiences and challenges faced by teachers. The main target population comprised
primary school teachers in Dhaka and Satkhira city. The study aimed to identify the underlying causes of
the imbalance between teachers’ training and their actual classroom practices, as well as the problems they
encounter in using teaching aids.
Interview
Kvale (1996, p.14), as cited in Cohen et al. (2000), defines an interview as an interchange of views between
two or more people on a topic of mutual interest,emphasizing the role of human interaction in knowledge
production and the social situatedness of research data. Best (1982) also noted that interviews often surpass
other data-gathering tools in depth and flexibility.
For this study, one-on-one, in-depth interviews were developed and conducted by the researcher. Interviews
were used to collect detailed qualitative data from teachers regarding their use of teaching aids, the challenges
they face, and the reasons behind these challenges. This method provided the opportunity for direct interaction,
enabling the researcher to probe and clarify responses where necessary. As Raj (1984, p.176) stated, “The
interview is a face-to-face interpersonal situation in which one person, the interviewer, asks a person being
interviewed.” Interviews also allowed teachers to offer suggestions on how to overcome the challenges
identified.
Sample and Sampling
A total of ten public primary schools, five from Dhaka city and five from Satkhira city were selected
purposively to ensure relevance to the research focus. Within these schools, teachers were selected using
simple random sampling to provide diverse perspectives. Only teachers teaching at the primary level were
included in the study. This combination of purposive and random sampling ensured both targeted and
representative data collection.
Research Tools
For qualitative data collection, semi-structured interviews were used as the main research tool. The interview
questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions designed to encourage teachers to share their experiences
freely. As Phillips and Burbules (2000) note, “Data, evidence, and rational considerations shape knowledge. In
practice, the researcher collects information on instruments based on measures completed by participants or by
observations recorded by the researcher.”
Qualitative research enables researchers to examine subjects in their natural environments and interpret their
experiences accordingly (Denzin & Lincoln, 1998). Hence, this method was deemed appropriate for
understanding teachers’ real-life classroom practices and contextual challenges.
Population
According to Gay and Airasian (1996), population refers to the group of interest to a researcher to which study
results are ideally generalized. In this study, the population consisted of primary school teachers in Dhaka
and Satkhira city. The selection directly aligns with the study’s objective to explore the challenges faced by
these teachers in using teaching aids in their classrooms.
Data Analysis Techniques
Data analysis involved inspecting, categorizing, and interpreting the qualitative data to draw meaningful
insights. Hatch (2002) defines data analysis as a process of inspecting, cleaning, transforming, and modeling
data with the goal of highlighting useful information, suggesting conclusions, and supporting decision
making.”
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4736
The collected data were organized into ten thematic categories, following the framework of Lawson et al.
(1976):
1. Teachers’ understanding of teaching aids
2. Overload of work
3. Time management
4. Teachers’ preparation for class
5. Conservation and maintenance of teaching aids
6. Supervision and monitoring
7. Large class size
8. Lack of appropriate teaching aids
9. Unavailability of school facilities and resources
10. Government policy
The analysis focused on identifying the key challenges faced by primary school teachers in implementing
teaching aids effectively in their classrooms and understanding the contextual factors influencing these
challenges.
Ethical consideration:
Data were collected only after obtaining formal permission from the relevant authorities. The researchers
maintained strict confidentiality and anonymity throughout the study. All participants were informed about the
purpose and nature of the research before the interviews were conducted. Participation was entirely voluntary,
and no teacher who declined to participate was included in the study.
During data collection, the researchers were physically present to conduct and monitor the interviews, ensuring
that participants felt comfortable and respected. The names or identifying information of the participants were
not recorded to protect their privacy. The researchers were transparent about the research process from the
outset, disclosing any personal biases or interests that might influence the study. All data were analyzed as
collected without any manipulation, ensuring that the findings genuinely reflected the participants’ views and
experiences.
Data Analysis
In this study, a one-to-one in-depth interview method was employed to collect qualitative data. A total of
twenty primary teachers, selected randomly from ten purposively chosen schools in Satkhira city,
participated in the interviews. After a careful review and interpretation of the collected data, the researchers
developed several key themes based on the teachers responses, opinions, and personal experiences. These
themes reflect the teachers’ understanding, perceptions, and challenges regarding the use of teaching aids in
the classroom.
Teachers’ Understanding of Teaching Aids
Most of the respondent teachers had received pre-service or in-service training, which provided them with a
good understanding of teaching aids and their pedagogical benefits. Even the few who were relatively new to
the profession and had not yet received formal training demonstrated a basic awareness of the concept and
importance of teaching aids. The teachers commonly expressed that using teaching aids facilitates effective
teaching and enhances student learning outcomes. Their insights are elaborated below through sub-themes that
emerged from the data.
Long-Lasting Learning
A majority of teachers emphasized that teaching aids play a crucial role in promoting meaningful and long-
lasting learning. They noted that such aids help students move beyond rote memorization toward real
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4737
understanding. When lessons are supported by visual or physical materials, students can grasp abstract ideas
more concretely, leading to better retention of knowledge over time.
From Abstract to Concrete
Primary school students often struggle to comprehend abstract concepts due to their developmental stage.
Teachers agreed that concrete learning materials—objects drawn from students’ real-life surroundingshelp
bridge the gap between abstract textbook content and tangible experience. By linking real-world materials with
classroom instruction, students can more easily relate to the subject matter. Teachers also observed that
colorful and creative teaching aids attract students’ attention and foster curiosity, making lessons more
effective.
Grabbing Students’ Attention
Teachers highlighted that maintaining the full attention of a large primary classroom is one of their greatest
challenges. Young learners are naturally restless and easily distracted, particularly when lessons rely solely on
lecture methods. Several teachers shared that teaching aids help capture and sustain students’ attention,
reducing disruptive behavior and keeping them focused on the lesson. The use of visuals, models, or hands-on
materials makes the class more engaging and minimizes boredom.
Making Lessons Attractive
Many respondents mentioned that teaching aids transform ordinary lessons into interesting and interactive
learning experiences. The presence of objects with different colors, shapes, and textures in the classroom
sparks curiosity among students. Teachers observed that when lessons are visually appealing, students are
more likely to participate actively and maintain interest throughout the class. Consequently, the learning
environment becomes dynamic and student-centered.
Joyful Learning
Teachers consistently stated that new and varied learning experiences make lessons enjoyable for students.
They observed that relying exclusively on lecture-based methods often causes disinterest and fatigue.
Conversely, using a variety of teaching aids stimulates excitement and enjoyment in learning. When students
find joy in the classroom, their motivation increases, and their learning becomes more meaningful and long-
lasting. The teachers described this as the essence of “joyful learning.”
Learning through Visual Experience
Several teachers pointed out that teaching aids provide students with opportunities to learn through seeing.
Visual learning allows students to connect the teacher’s verbal explanations with concrete examples,
reinforcing comprehension. Teachers noted that visual stimuli, such as charts, models, and demonstrations,
make lessons more memorable and help students develop a stronger grasp of the subject matter.
Easy and Effortless Learning
Teachers agreed that teaching aids significantly simplify complex or abstract content, making it easier for
students to understand and remember. Visual and tactile aids help translate theoretical concepts into concrete
experiences, thus making learning more accessible. As a result, students experience fewer difficulties in
grasping lessons, and the overall learning process becomes smoother and more effective.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4738
FINDINGS
A total of twenty primary school teachers were interviewed for this study. Among them, all but one held a
professional teaching degree. The findings reveal that teachers possess a clear understanding of teaching aids
and acknowledge their importance in improving classroom learning. However, despite this awareness, most
teachers expressed dissatisfaction with their actual use of teaching aids in classrooms due to various
challenges.
Overload of Work
In the context of Bangladesh, primary teachers face numerous responsibilities beyond teaching, including
exam evaluation, administrative duties, participation in public examinations, and training sessions. These
additional workloads prevent teachers from focusing adequately on lesson preparation or effective use of
teaching aids.
Respondents commonly cited excessive class pressure as the main obstacle. With five to six consecutive
classes daily and minimal breaks, teachers often struggle to prepare adequately for each session. The heavy
workload leads to fatigue, stress, and reduced enthusiasm, which in turn affects classroom performance and
student engagement. As Herman et al. (2018) note, when teachers experience emotional exhaustion, it
negatively impacts both their teaching effectiveness and student outcomes.
Time Management Challenges
Ineffective time management was identified as another major issue. Data collected from ten schools showed
that teachers often have no gap between classes, leaving no opportunity to organize materials or prepare
teaching aids.
Additionally, the short duration of classes restricts teachers from managing roll calls, checking homework, and
addressing individual students’ needs—particularly in overcrowded classrooms. Respondents agreed that
managing lessons, students, and teaching aids within limited time is extremely difficult.
UNICEF (1993) similarly reported that Bangladesh has one of the lowest instructional hours in Asiaonly
444 hours annually in grades III, compared to 1,100 in Indonesia and 1,235 in China. The findings of this
study also align with Dr. Md. Abdul Halim’s (2011) research on “low contact hours.”
As Silva (2007) emphasized, improving the quality of instructional time is as crucial as increasing its quantity.
Therefore, effective classroom time management remains a vital area for reform.
Large Class Size
Class size emerged as another major challenge. Teachers reported difficulty maintaining effective teaching-
learning environments in overcrowded classrooms. This finding is consistent with Harmer (2005), who noted
that large classes hinder both teaching efficiency and student participation.
Similarly, Dr. Abdul Halims comparative study between Bangladesh and West Bengal also found that the
teacherstudent ratio in Bangladesh is significantly higher, leading to decreased instructional quality.
Lack of Appropriate Teaching Aids
Teachers frequently mentioned the unavailability or insufficiency of appropriate teaching materials. This
limitation restricts the use of active learning strategies, echoing Eison’s (2010) findings that large class sizes
and lack of instructional materials act as barriers to active learning. Pia (2015) also observed that inadequate
teaching aids reduce student motivation and overall classroom engagement.
Government Policy and Institutional Factors
Findings also indicate systemic issues such as inadequate supervision, insufficient funding, and ineffective
implementation of ICT initiatives. According to the NAPE report (Sarker et al., 2017), teachers often face
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4739
obstacles like insufficient training, lack of functioning ICT equipment, and inadequate institutional support.
These problems directly affect teachers’ ability to integrate teaching aids effectively into classroom practice.
Limitations of the study
The primary limitation of this study is the small sample size. Only a limited number of primary teachers were
selected due to financial constraints and time limitations. Additionally, the study was confined to a single
administrative division in Bangladesh, which restricts the scope and generalizability of the findings.
Therefore, while the results provide valuable insights into the challenges faced by primary teachers in using
teaching aids, they should be interpreted with caution, as they may not fully represent the broader population
of primary school teachers across the country.
Implications
Teacher’s Professional Mindset
The study reveals that primary teachers possess knowledge about teaching aids, their benefits, and methods of
use. They are also aware of their professional responsibilities; however, many fail to implement all aspects of
their duties fully, sometimes intentionally neglecting certain tasks. Teachers should cultivate a committed and
professional mindset, prioritizing their core responsibilities over opportunistic or convenience-based
practices. Developing such dedication is essential for improving classroom teaching quality and student
learning outcomes.
Educational Institutions’ Support and Cohabitation
Educational institutions play a crucial role in supporting teachers. School authorities must recognize the
complexities teachers face in managing classroom teaching and learning processes. Institutions should actively
identify challenges through supervision, monitoring, and individual discussions with teachers. Collaborative
problem-solving and targeted support can empower teachers to implement teaching aids effectively and create
a more engaging and productive learning environment.
Government Policy
The government must ensure equitable policies across all sectors of education, addressing disparities between
rural and urban schools. Policies related to teacher training, post-training skill assessment, provision of
teaching-learning resources, and supplementary support require regular review. Implementing need-based,
context-specific policy measures can significantly enhance teacher performance and facilitate the effective
use of teaching aids in classrooms.
Future Research
While this study identifies key challenges, including professional negligence, inadequate teaching aids, poor
time management, limited school facilities, and insufficient policy support, it does not focus in-depth on
specific areas such as teacher training quality, classroom instructional strategies, school infrastructure, or
policy implementation. Future research should explore these dimensions separately, with larger and more
diverse samples, to provide actionable insights for improving teaching aid integration and overall primary
education quality in Bangladesh.
CONCLUSION
Teaching aids play a crucial role in enhancing classroom learning by creating a visual, interactive, and
engaging environment for students. They help reduce monotony, clarify complex concepts, and provide direct,
hands-on experience, which ultimately promotes active participation and sustained attention throughout the
lesson.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4740
In Bangladesh, primary school teachers face multiple challenges in effectively implementing teaching aids,
including workload pressures, time constraints, inadequate resources, and limited institutional and policy
support. When used properly, teaching aids can significantly improve learning outcomes and help achieve
lesson objectives. To ensure their effective use, teachers need to plan and utilize available resources efficiently,
school authorities should provide consistent support, and the government must review and adapt policies to
address gaps in training, resources, and classroom conditions.
REFERENCES
1. Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: An investigation into teachers' subject
knowledge. London, England: Falmer Press.
2. Almazroui, A. (2013). Shortened school days would not help children learn.
3. Baker, D. P., Fabrega, R., Galindo, C., & Mishook, J. (2004). Instructional time and national
achievement: Cross-national evidence. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 34(3),
311334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-004-5310-1
4. Brophy, J., Good, T. L., & Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C.
Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328375). New York, NY: Simon &
Schuster.
5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and
qualitative research (4th ed., p. 16). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
6. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning.
University of South Florida.
8. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of
Education for Teaching, 15(1), 1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102
9. Farbman, D., Christie, K., Davis, J., Griffith, M., & Zinth, J. D. (2011). Learning time in America:
Trends to reform the American school calendar. Boston, MA: National Center on Time & Learning.
10. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application.
Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
11. Hill, H. C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2005). Teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching and school
context: A study of California teachers [Manuscript submitted for publication].
12. Sarker, M. Z., Ohiduzzaman, D. K., Rabiul Islam, K. M. S. A., & Hassan, D. M. N. (2017, June). A study
on implementation of ICT in education training in government primary schools [Report]. Mymensingh,
Dhaka: National Academy for Primary Education (NAPE).
13. National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (2005). Prisoners of time. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office. (Original work published 1994)
14. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year: A systematic
review of research (19852009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401436.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086
15. Pennington, H. C. (2006). Expanded learning time in high schools. Washington, DC: National Center on
Time & Learning.
16. Pia, K. F. (2015). Barriers in teaching-learning process of mathematics at secondary level: A quest for
quality improvement. American Journal of Education Research, 3(7), 822832.
17. Raj, H. (1984). Theory and practice in social research. Delhi, India: Surjeet Publications.
18. Rashid, M., & Ritu, S. (2013). Teachers professional preparation, income, job satisfaction, and
performance: An exploratory study. Bangladesh Education Journal.
19. Silva, E. (2007). On the clock: Rethinking the way schools use time. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 4741
20. Tasnim, J. (2014). An investigation into teachers’ attitude towards teaching aids in science classroom at
secondary level in Dhaka city.
21. University of Missouri. (2018, April 27). More than 9 in 10 elementary school teachers feel highly
stressed. ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180427125619.htm
22. Halim, M. A. (2011). A comparative study of mathematics curriculum at primary level in Bangladesh
and India (West Bengal). Bangladesh Education Article. https://bdeduarticle.com/a-comparative-study-
of-mathematics-curriculum-at-primary-level-in-bangladesh-and-india-west-bengal/