INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4784
www.rsisinternational.org
Video-Based Learning for Higher Education 5.0 Exposure and
Immersion
Airil Haimi Mohd Adnan
Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000395
Received: 12 October 2025; Accepted: 20 October 2025; Published: 13 November 2025
ABSTRACT
The Higher Education 5.0 initiative represents a shift in tertiary education, seeking to align academic
instructions with the realities students will encounter in their future workplaces. The transformations brought
about by Industry 4.0 have fundamentally altered workplace training paradigms. Tertiary students, as
tomorrow’s workforce, are increasingly encountering educational technologies characteristic of Higher
Education 5.0, with video-based learning (VBL) emerging as a particularly significant innovation. As a
cornerstone of the flipped classroom model, VBL has become instrumental in facilitating blended pedagogical
approaches across universities and tertiary institutions. Throughout the ASEAN region, this technology is
proving transformative for both learners and instructors, enabling round-the-clock access to educational
content and supporting truly flexible learning environments. Concise, engaging, and informative video content
is rapidly becoming the defining medium for knowledge transmission within the Higher Education 5.0
paradigm. This empirical investigation builds upon earlier efforts to develop and disseminate explainer video
content designed for broader, more accessible teaching approaches that emphasise fundamental concepts
which learners subsequently develop independently. Contemporary VBL has evolved beyond its origins as an
informal learning tool to become a mainstream pedagogical resource spanning both academic and corporate
educational contexts.
Keywords: Video-based Learning, exposure, immersion, flipped classroom, blended learning
INTRODUCTION
Contemporary educational practice is witnessing an unprecedented acceleration in technological integration.
As we progress through the 21st century, digital tools have become ubiquitous resources for both teaching
professionals and their students. This technological pervasiveness has fundamentally transformed the
parameters of learning, enabling educational engagement irrespective of temporal or spatial constraints
(Adnan, Ahmad, Yusof, Mohd Kamal & Mustafa Kamal, 2019). Furthermore, pedagogical processes can now
be facilitated remotely through video content, sophisticated digital devices, and various technology-based
methodologies (see Adnan & Zamari, 2012a, 2012b; Mohd Adnan, 2018; Zamari & Adnan, 2011). Within this
rapidly evolving educational technology landscape, video-based learning (VBL) has emerged as a particularly
prominent phenomenon (see Mustafa Kamal, Adnan, Yusof, Ahmad & Mohd Kamal, 2019).
This instructional approach has gained adoption across diverse sectors, including corporate training
environments, engineering education, medical instruction, and general educational contexts. Drawing upon my
experience in technology-focused content creation, VBL encompasses various formats: animated presentations
incorporating infographics and textual elements, scenario-based recordings featuring human interaction,
expert-led explainer content with conceptual narratives, kinetic typography videos, and interactive whiteboard
animations. These formats prove particularly effective for demonstrating procedures, introducing new
concepts, and providing illustrative examples (see Yusof, Adnan, Mustafa Kamal, Mohd Kamal & Ahmad,
2019; Mohd, Adnan, Yusof, Ahmad & Mohd Kamal, 2019). Within higher education, 360-degrees virtual
reality or VR video technologies are employed to help tertiary students master, for instance, professional
communication, meeting facilitation, interview techniques, decision-making and other competencies (see
Figures 1 and 2). This immersive instructional delivery approach provides learners with experiential
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4785
www.rsisinternational.org
understanding that is comparable to ‘real world’ physical presence (Ahmad, Adnan, Yusof, Mohd Kamal &
Mustafa Kamal, 2019).
Figure 1. ‘ELSA 360-Videos’ 360-degrees (VR capable) VBL resource for professional communication
In truth, contemporary students face demanding academic schedules characterised by substantial homework
requirements, numerous assignments, and extensive extracurricular commitments. These pressures can lead to
physical and mental exhaustion, with time management emerging as a significant challenge. Consequently,
class attendance may suffer, resulting in students falling behind in their coursework. The flipped classroom
model is a remedy to this challenge, offering solutions beneficial to both educators and learners. This
pedagogical innovation aims to facilitate student preparation before formal instruction begins. Essentially,
lecture content is provided in advance of scheduled class sessions, allowing actual face-to-face contact to be
dedicated to practical application and active learning exercises. The flipped instructional approach gained
prominence in 2007 when two American high school teachers developed an innovative method to deliver
content to absent students. Their solution involved recording lessons and making them available online (see
Bergmann & Sams, 2014). This approach has subsequently transformed traditional pedagogical models,
enabling asynchronous delivery of instructional content outside scheduled contact hours whilst preserving
classroom time for practice and enrichment.
Figure 2. ‘ELSA 360-Videos’ exposing and immersing tertiary students to business meetings
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4786
www.rsisinternational.org
Complementing flipped classroom, the blended learning (or BL) framework has similarly gained considerable
traction. Jeffrey, Milne, Suddaby and Higgins (2014) characterise it as a pedagogical process that eliminates
time-based, physical, and situational barriers whilst simultaneously enabling direct interaction between
instructors and learners. This innovative concept effectively synthesises the strengths of traditional face-to-face
instruction with ICT-enhanced learning environments (Ahmad, Adnan, Azamri, Idris, Norafand & Ishak, 2019;
Mohd Adnan, 2019). The methodology incorporates both online and offline learning modalities. Unlike the
flipped classroom model, BL represents a category of online-facilitated education where instructors and
learners engage synchronously in real-time. Instructors can facilitate discussions, collaborative idea exchange,
and practical exercises. This approach reduces physical classroom interaction in favour of synchronous online
discussions and digital content delivery. Such pedagogical shifts influence students’ perceptions of their
educational environment, positively affecting their studies and academic outcomes. Research demonstrates a
strong correlation between blended learning methodologies and enhanced educational experiences.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Contemporary millennials and Generation Z have demonstrably embraced video as their preferred medium for
both content creation and consumption. Video content pervades the Internet, readily accessible to diverse
audiences, particularly adolescents and tertiary-level students. Educational practitioners can leverage numerous
platforms as VBL resources, including YouTube, Vimeo, Netflix, and various alternatives. Consequently, VBL
has been integrated into diverse pedagogical approaches, encompassing flipped classrooms, eLearning
environments, open online courses, and numerous other applications. This technology has revolutionised the
teaching-learning dynamic, elevating educational practices to unprecedented levels. Previously, instruction
relied predominantly on traditional methodologies. Conventional lecture formats should no longer serve as the
primary vehicle for knowledge dissemination. The ‘chalk and talk’ approach has long dominated educational
practice, with many instructors continuing to depend exclusively on printed textbooks. Moreover, rote
memorisation and manual notetaking represent techniques increasingly regarded as outdated. These traditional
approaches share problematic characteristics: they prove tedious, monotonous, and time-consuming. VBL
implementation addresses and ameliorates these deficiencies comprehensively.
Notable pedagogical and practical advantages of VBL
Educational video content has experienced remarkable growth in recent years. This expansion stems from
VBL’s association with engagement and student-centred principles. Additionally, most universities have
adopted this in conjunction with the proliferation of advanced smartphones, smart tablets, and laptop
computers. Traphagan, Kucsera and Kishis research (2010) supports this trend, with learners characterising
video lectures (VBL) as entertaining, stimulating, motivational, and pedagogically efficient. The advantages
associated with VBL are substantial and continually expanding. VBL supports students in developing effective
study materials and preparing for examinations. Van Zanten, Somogyi and Curro’s empirical investigation
(2012) demonstrated that learners predominantly utilise video lectures for revision purposes. This technology
therefore serves as a valuable resource for study and review activities. Students consistently emphasise the
accessibility and convenience afforded by video-based lectures.
Figure 3. Enhancing the educational experience of tertiary students via VBL
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4787
www.rsisinternational.org
Another significant advantage of VBL lies in students’ ability to control their learning experience. They can
readily review content, rewind segments, and navigate material according to their individual needs. These
instructional videos prove particularly valuable preceding formal assessments, enabling targeted revision of
specific content areas and skills whilst alleviating student anxiety. Furthermore, the capacity for repeated
practice and selective content navigation represents a widely recognised benefit for tertiary students. Meeting
and discussion simulations exemplify another successful application. This methodology presents scenarios
through 360-degree camera perspectives, enabling students to experience and observe professional meeting
conduct in an immersive manner. Through repeated practice, anxiety levels diminish whilst confidence
correspondingly increases (Adnan, Ahmad, Yusof, Mohd Kamal & Mustafa Kamal, 2019). Figure 3 above
highlights the strengths of VBL based on recent research.
VBL to create exposure and to lead to immersion
Educators and instructors have integrated and applied various theoretical frameworks regarding VBL
implementation. These theories include collaborative learning principles, which emphasise developing,
discussing, and exploring alternative perspectives. Learners cultivate problem-solving capabilities through peer
collaboration, sharing viewpoints, perspectives, and activities. VBL can enhance educational processes
through various mechanisms, including video summarisation. Chang, Yang and Wu (2011) observed that
students extract content from video lectures by recording essential information. Subsequently, the researchers
successfully developed a video summarisation platform and enabling learners to organise information whilst at
the same time reducing learning time. Video-based assessments represent another practical VBL usage for
pedagogical purposes. Qiao and Beling (2011) demonstrated that brief videos simulating authentic scenarios
and challenges can effectively assess students, requiring them to formulate responses to presented situations.
Learners must respond in real-time, selecting appropriate reactions for each scenario. This enables students to
foster thinking skills and respond constructively when confronted with disruptions or distractions.
Hybrid and student-centred learning constitute two more possible VBL applications within educational
contexts. The former synthesises online learning with traditional instructional methodologies, as documented
by Chenail (2011). Pang (2011) conducted research employing VBL for physical education instruction,
discovering that coaches or trainers could identify learners errors, enabling subsequent reflection on these
mistakes. Learners could then execute exercises correctly utilising the provided VBL resources, with most
participants reporting subsequent improvement. Learners can similarly enhance their oral communication
competencies through video lecture utilisation in language-based courses. Smyth (2011) reported that most
VBL classes adopt student-centred approaches, with fewer than 15% remaining teacher centred. Therefore,
VBL demonstrably provides opportunities for students to engage in collaboration to structure knowledge,
develop understanding, and achieve consensus with peers.
VBL as part of the ‘flipped classroom’ initiative
As demands for more effective and comprehensive pedagogical approaches have intensified in response to
globalisation, cultural transformation, and digital-age telecommunications technologies, numerous empirical
investigations have focused on conceptualising flipped classroom pedagogy. One such investigation
characterises the flipped classroom as an effective instructional strategy employing technology as a learning
medium, specifically utilising online video resources to reduce lecture duration whilst expanding classroom
time for collaborative learning through practical application (DeLozier & Rhodes, 2017). This pedagogical
movement clearly emphasises instructional video technology deployment to create additional opportunities for
instructors to concentrate on implementing classroom activities that assess students comprehension of
learning materials, rather than focusing exclusively on content transmission. Fundamentally, flipped classroom
pedagogy aims to convert the class environment from teacher-led to learner-centred.
An alternative conceptualisation of flipped classrooms describes them as instructional models that invert the
functions of lectures and conventional homework within academic courses (Bergmann & Sams, 2012).
Specifically, traditional in-class lecture instruction is converted into digital video format, enabling students to
review these materials beyond scheduled classroom hours. This methodology allows learners to focus on
addressing persistent individual challenges rather than dedicating substantial time to lectures they may struggle
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4788
www.rsisinternational.org
to comprehend initially. Within this framework, instructors assume facilitator roles, motivating, guiding, and
providing feedback based on student performance rather than serving as the focal point of classroom
interaction as in traditional methods. Responsibility consequently transitions from teachers to their students
within the flipped approach. In flipped settings, students receive greater autonomy, providing them with
opportunities to investigate and pose questions regarding the subject at their own speed, and according to their
readiness and ability levels.
Given the flexible and adaptable characteristics of the flipped classroom approach, this learning environment
proves particularly suitable and practical for language classroom implementation (Egbert, Herman & Lee,
2015). Instructors can, for instance, provide students with grammar tutorials and lessons alongside quizzes to
prepare them before class sessions. Consequently, classroom time can be devoted to practicing authentic
everyday language usage rather than merely learning about these elements theoretically, as occurs in
traditional teaching methods. According to Reynard (2007), rather than constituting the central aspect of
teaching and learning sessions, classroom instruction should function as scaffolding for language acquisition
processes. As an essential component of comprehensive language learning processes, class periods should
emphasise language enhancement activities such as group work or demonstration performances. By relocating
explicit instruction to out-of-classroom contexts, the flipped approach has created prospects for authentic real-
world exchanges during class, thereby enhancing the language learning process.
Several empirical investigations have examined the flipped approach as compared to outdated classroom
methodologies. Research by Santikarn and Wichadee (2018) found that the majority of learners they studied
expressed agreement that flipped classrooms provided more encouraging learning environments. Among
numerous investigations favouring flipped classrooms, Moffet and Mill’s study (2014) found that the flipped
model proved beneficial and received good responses from most veterinary students. This finding corresponds
with another comparative investigation by Chen and Chen, examining students’ perspectives on cooperative
learning between flipped and traditional classrooms (Chen, Wang & Chen, 2014). Additionally, two further
investigations discovered evidence that flipped classrooms surpass traditional classrooms regarding teacher
support, enhanced student engagement, and promotion of active learning (McLaughlin, Roth, Glatt,
Gharkholonarehe, Davidson, Griffin, Esserman & Mumper, 2014; Strayer, 2012). Hung (2015), investigating
the potential of the flipped approach on attitudes to learning, found that there are many benefits to students.
For instance, students emerging from flipped classroom experiences were observed to demonstrate greater
commitment to learning alongside developing considerably more optimism towards their learning processes
compared to those in traditional classrooms.
However, Santikarn and Wichadee (2018) also acknowledged that generally favourable perspectives on flipped
classrooms are not universal, as several investigations suggest alternative conclusions. For instance, despite
benefiting from flipped classrooms regarding improvements in their learning and communication
competencies, one investigation discovered that some students nevertheless expressed negative attitudes
towards the flipped model (Ferreri & OConnor, 2013). An additional investigation found that the majority of
students and staff still preferred teacher-oriented lecture-based approaches over flipped classroom approaches
for particular academic subjects (Missildine, Fountain, Summers, & Gosselin, 2013).
VBL as support for ‘blended learning’ methodology
Blended learning as terminology requires definition. According to Cuesta Medina (2018), blended learning
deployment encompasses the application of information and communication technologies to distinctive
instructional delivery modes and approaches compared with traditional learning methodologies. This
perspective aligns with another investigation stating that given the widespread and ubiquitous literature on
blended learning, attempting to comprehend blended learning definitions varies with each application and
investigation, creating general uncertainty surrounding blended learning definition (Kanuka & Rourke, 2013).
To this end, Kanuka and Rourke maintained that the approach integrates on-campus experiences with Internet
learning. Given the possibilities derived from Internet-based tools and contents, implementing blended
learning presents its own set of obstacles.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4789
www.rsisinternational.org
Regardless, current pedagogically linked blended learning definitions gravitate towards three common
instructional and educational facets (Kanuka, 2001). Firstly, it functions as an instrument in educational
processes, integrating Internet tools as a technology shortcut to create learning tasks. Secondly, it serves as a
learning environment that employs Internet-based tools as educational platforms, for example learning
management systems (LMS) such as BlackBoard or Moodle. Thirdly, it operates as a medium for education
that utilises the Internet’s communicative features to facilitate interactive learning experiences.
Rationale for research
The Fourth Industrial Revolution continues to exert influence on global educational landscapes, necessitating
transformative pedagogical approaches that align with evolving workplace demands and societal expectations.
Video-based Learning (VBL) has emerged as a pivotal instructional innovation within this transformation,
offering scalable, accessible, and engaging learning experiences that transcend traditional classroom
boundaries. However, empirical evidence regarding student perspectives on VBL integration remains limited,
particularly within Southeast Asian tertiary contexts where educational institutions grapple with rapid
digitalisation whilst preserving pedagogical effectiveness and cultural relevance. Contemporary
implementations of Higher Education 5.0 technologies emphasise human-centred learning environments that
leverage digital tools including AI, IoT, and immersive realities to produce customised and efficient
educational experiences preparing graduates for Society 5.0 demands (Mohd Adnan et al., 2020). Within this
paradigm, VBL represents a pragmatic yet powerful mechanism for delivering content that accommodates
diverse learning preferences, promotes autonomous engagement, and facilitates ‘just-in-time knowledge
acquisition.
This investigation examines VBL implementation across diploma and degree programs spanning Malaysia,
Brunei, and Indonesia. Given that contemporary youths (Millennials and Generation Z) demonstrate advanced
digital literacy alongside distinctive preferences for multimodal, technology-enhanced learning experiences
(Shahroom & Hussin, 2018), understanding how these learners perceive and engage with VBL becomes
imperative for educators seeking to design responsive, future-oriented curricula. Through qualitative inquiry
involving tertiary students across three Southeast Asian nations, this research provides empirical insights into
VBLs multifaceted role in shaping present and future higher education landscapes. Based on these
considerations, a first-hand investigation was undertaken to accomplish three research objectives (RO):
RO1: How do tertiary students perceive the effectiveness of short-duration VBL (i.e., explainer videos) in
developing Industry 4.0 and professional language competencies?
RO2: What are the key affordances and constraints of VBL implementation from the lived experiences of
students?
RO3: How does VBL contribute to Higher Education 5.0 innovations and future oriented teaching-learning
environments?
METHODOLOGY
Research design
This investigation utilised mainly two VBL-supported courses for diploma and degree students from various
Malaysian colleges and universities (n=58), alongside polytechnic students from Brunei (n=10) and Indonesia
(n=8). ‘Thick’ qualitative data (Adnan, 2013a, 2013b) were collected from 76 research participants primarily
through focus group discussion sessions, supplemented by semi-structured face-to-face interviews with
selected participants. The diploma-level VBL program emphasised critical skills for the workplace (related to
Industry 4.0), whereas the degree-level VBL program concentrated on language competencies for professional
contexts (Business English mainly). For the diploma-level program, VBL was incorporated across 10 modules
with each lasting two hours with VBL comprising 10-15 minutes of actual classroom time. Regarding the
degree-level program, this constituted 14-week exposure with two weekly contact hours; each week, 15-20
minutes of VBL became part of the instructional delivery strategy to prepare students for their assessments.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4790
www.rsisinternational.org
Research instrument
Focus group discussion (FGD or focused group interview is a valuable qualitative-oriented instrument to
collect information regarding personal viewpoints on innovative ideas, challenges and solutions concerning
past, present and future contexts. Focus group participants share their answers to questions within a supportive
environment, and they are encouraged to share their personal and collective thoughts and ideas freely with
other participants. These sessions can typically generate valuable insights and provide abundant data for
qualitative researchers (Mohd Adnan, 2017).
Figure 4. VBL open educational resource (OER) for Industry 4.0 exposure and immersion (sample 1)
Session summaries and field notes were gathered following each FGD session for analysis and reporting.
These written records served as supplementary documentation, capturing not only the verbal exchanges but
also non-verbal cues, group dynamics, and the atmosphere of each discussion session. For both FGD sessions
and semi-structured interviews, data were preserved using digital recording equipment to ensure accurate
verbatim transcription of all participant contributions. The audio recordings provided a permanent and reliable
record to enhance the rigour and credibility of the qualitative analysis. Occasionally video clips were created to
capture visual demonstrations or particularly animated discussions where facial expressions and gestures
contributed meaningfully to the discussions.
Figure 5. VBL open educational resource (OER) for Industry 4.0 exposure and immersion (sample 2)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4791
www.rsisinternational.org
Research participants
The collection of data or fieldwork occurred from 2019 to 2021, particularly during a VBL-centred diploma
course teaching critical skills for Industry 4.0 called ‘Potentia IR40 ASEAN-level’ (see Figures 4 and 5). The
course participants constitute the majority of participants in this paper. A smaller cohort of degree students
participated in a VBL-linked Business English course. These students also served as testers for a 360-degrees
VR videos project that I produced and directed entitled ‘ELSA 360-Videos’ (as shown in Figures 1 and 2).
Data analysis
Data were transcribed based on significance. The analysis process involved constructing textual data records
for the participants, coding portions of the data that are relevant to this paper, and lastly thematising the
relevant data. The participants were asked to share ideas and experiences in an open manner. They agreed that
the data they provided can be used for empirical analysis and also academic publication purposes whilst
preserving their identities. Some quotations from the participants are presented and critically analysed in the
next section.
Ethics and limitations
This research effort adhered to established ethical protocols throughout its design and implementation. All
participants were fully informed about the aims and procedures before providing voluntary consent to
participate. Confidentiality was maintained rigorously, with personal identifiers removed from all data sets and
secure storage protocols employed in accordance with institutional guidelines. Also, the participants retained
the right to withdraw from the study at any stage without consequence.
Several limitations must be acknowledged when interpreting findings. Firstly, the geographical specificity of
the study context may constrain the generalisability of results to broader Higher Education 5.0 environments
across different cultural and pedagogical landscapes. Secondly, the data collection occurred in the years of the
recent global pandemic, a watershed moment that fundamentally transformed educational technology adoption
and student engagement with video-based learning globally. The accelerated digital transition necessitated by
pandemic restrictions has likely altered both learner attitudes and institutional approaches to VBL.
Consequently, whilst the findings offer valuable insights into VBL adoption patterns, they should be
contextualised within the specific temporal and geographical frames.
FINDINGS
This section presents the emergent themes based on the participants’ voices. Pseudonyms selected by the
participants themselves are employed to preserve their true identities. The themes addressed are as follows:
General perceptions of VBL in higher education teaching and learning; Using VBL to learn freely and
independently anytime and anywhere; and VBL as part of Higher Education 5.0 and future teaching-learning
initiatives.
Perception of VBL in / for tertiary education
Overall, all participants in this research project demonstrated positive perceptions regarding the use of VBL in
the education process (see Figure 6). They appreciated that VBL allows them to experience a kind of “thinking
stimulation” rather than simply looking at and memorising words on paper. This suggests that the current
cohort of learners who are studying at colleges, polytechnics and universities have a unique way of learning
and getting knowledge compared to earlier generations of tertiary students. VBL is also perceived to be “quite
cool”, as an instructional delivery method that delivers skills and knowledge in short bursts. This has an
advantage by appealing to the actual ‘expansionist’ learning style of contemporary learners where exposure
and immersion to basic information is all that is needed before they expand and rebuild the knowledge in their
minds.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4792
www.rsisinternational.org
For ‘Miss Yusra’, the skills needed for current tertiary students “is not just to read and memorise, but the most
important thing now is to quickly learn how to build up our knowledge from simple points.” This presents a
significant opportunity for educators and content developers to employ VBL given that short video clips of
approximately 60 seconds or at most perhaps 2 to 3 minutes can be the ideal 'package' to deliver just the very
basic of information that can scaffold student learning for later (see Giannakos, Jaccheri & Krogstie, 2016).
Subsequently, the responsibility falls on the shoulders of these students to expand their comprehension from
the basic points, simple terms or paraphrases that are presented via the electronic medium of short video clips.
Figure 6. General perspectives of ASEAN university and college students with reference to VBL
Additionally, the participants hold the view that videos are fundamental contemporary educational resources,
and they prefer to be exposed to new ideas and immersed in new skills via the medium of video. This differs
from older generations of learners whereby videos are periphery to learning. Through VBL, video clips take a
more central position as important instructional delivery resource. As educational videos are quite common in
the here and now, they have become a central transmitter of knowledge and even skills. Indeed, for some
learners at tertiary level, video clips are the only content delivery method that matters when compared to
reading about the course or subject matters in their traditional textbooks. It is also important to take note that
most participants indicated that presently, some of their lecturers are turning fully to digital resources during
lectures or class sessions meaning that they do not rely on traditional textbooks, and only electronic resources
in the form of PDF file and presentation files (e.g., PowerPoint) are distributed to their students.
VBL for “anytime, anywhere learning”
Further, the participants in this investigation acknowledged that VBL allowed them to learn anytime and
anywhere that they want. This means that learning and skills acquisitions can happen even from the comfort of
their own beds (interestingly, this comment was made by many female participants, indicating a future
direction for researchers who are interested to know more). Undoubtedly, VBL educational resources are
easily digested ‘information nuggets’ that can provide information and skills that can later be internalised and
further expanded in the minds to their viewers (see Figure 7).
The issue of accessibility has been largely solved due to the proliferation of video sharing platforms like
YouTube, Vimeo and TikTok, and even platforms that support 360-degree videos and resource intensive VR
contents. To add to this, popular social networking platforms like Instagram, Facebook and Twitter also permit
the sharing of videos, even high-quality ones, at the push of a button. These video distribution platforms and
social networking sites are not just used for entertaining and socialising oneself, they now provide lecturers
and tertiary instructors an easy and open way to share and distribute video clips for teaching and learning.
Taking YouTube as an example, the comments section (or indeed any of the platforms or sites mentioned
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4793
www.rsisinternational.org
above) can easily be used as a way to persuade students to provide constructive comments or respond quickly
to whatever educational resource video that they must watch as part of their tertiary level course.
Figure 7. VBL and the critical notion of “anytime, anywhere learning”
The ability to also reply to other people’s comment is a positive way to spark discussions on different topics.
This is further evidence that although VBL educational resources might be seen as a fad or just insignificant
resources to support learning, in truth VBL clips are beginning to take a very central role in the process of
educating contemporary learners be it in schools, colleges or universities. VBL resources can also be used in
such a way that whatever is uploaded onto social media sites or video sharing platforms can then be used as
practice or exercise. As ‘Afham’ sees it:
When we say we do work online, we really go online [laughs], no need for exercise books or lots of papers in
files… later we might throw them or just forget. Online is where everything would still be there safely and
stuff like videos can be watched easily by anyone at any time that they want to.
VBL for Education 5.0 and future learning initiatives
With reference to the future of VBL, most of the participants in this empirical investigation indicated that short
yet useful ‘explainer videos’ will become part of future learning initiatives. As ‘Jessie’ justifies, her friends
realised that explainer videos give them “bursts of information and providing us much to learn within a short
period.” It is evident that these tertiary learners prefer VBL explainer videos over more traditional instructional
delivery methods, for example through extended one-way instructor-led lectures. She adds, “the best thing
about these [explainer] videos is that we can very easily repeat things that we watch, I can build up what I
know with my notes or come up with a simpler version of what I already learned.”
Figure 8. VBL and the critical notion of “anytime, anywhere learning”
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4794
www.rsisinternational.org
Several participants also forecast that in future, explainer videos will become more high-tech, immersive, and
fully interactive (see Figure 8). As ‘Faqih’ explains, “Maybe we can see 3D holograms just like in sci-fi TV
series or movies [...] maybe I can talk to the video and the video can talk back. We can then interact, share and
learn.” What Faqih said might not be too far in the future with recent advances in depth perceptive cameras,
sophisticated LIDAR sensors and highly sensitive yet affordably priced optical and video technologies coming
into the consumer market. He adds: It's not impossible because just look at all the technologies now like AR
and VR, they can give reality to the videos we use to learn new things.” And so, as far as video resources go,
whatever their purposes are, expect to see higher production value contents being created by teachers,
instructors and university professors to align with the actual learning styles of present and future generations of
tertiary learners. As ‘Afirah’ explains:
I read on LinkedIn that 94% of teachers use videos during the USA academic year. This is amazing. I think,
this is because learning with videos is effective for us students. Like what we discussed, for me it’s much
better than just the lecturer teaching with textbooks. It’s because our brain is mainly [geared] for processing
visual and video and audio stuff actually. Yes, reading textbooks is important at university I don’t doubt that.
But we mustn’t stop future trends too, right?
DISCUSSION
This research effort is grounded in the collaborative work of my content development team to conceptualise,
create, and disseminate 60-second educational ‘explainer’ video resources, with some extending slightly
beyond this duration, designed specifically to teach university and college students in a manner that is both
more contemporary and considerably more engaging than traditional textbook-based approaches. The findings
presented above demonstrate that video-based learning has transcended its earlier perception as merely casual
or informal learning that might cause students to waste valuable time on unproductive endeavours. Indeed,
VBL resources are rapidly and undeniably becoming one of the most sought-after teaching and learning tools
across both corporate and formal academic learning environments, particularly in the context of our post-
pandemic world of higher education where digital transformation has accelerated exponentially. This evolution
supports the core premise of providing Higher Education 5.0 exposure and immersion, whereby students are
increasingly immersed in digitally mediated learning experiences that reflect the technological realities and
expectations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The data analysis reveals that such exposure ensures students
encounter pedagogical innovations that align with contemporary professional and academic demands, thereby
enhancing their preparedness for future workplace environments characterised by rapid technological change
and digital fluency requirements.
With particular regard to the implementation of flipped learning pedagogies within flipped classroom
environments, the fundamental utility and pedagogical advantage of VBL lies in its capacity to enable and
facilitate learning to occur prior to scheduled classroom time and actual contact hours with instructors. This
temporal reorganisation not only saves time during face-to-face sessions but strategically allows the
educational instructor to refocus their attention and pedagogical energy on more valuable skills-based tasks,
hands-on applications, and intensive drills and exercises, given that students have already been exposed to the
essential theoretical core of a lesson or subject matter through pre-class VBL engagement. The empirical
evidence gathered from both focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews corroborates this
transformation in pedagogical practice, with participants consistently highlighting the enhanced efficiency and
effectiveness of contact time when foundational content has been pre-delivered through video formats.
Furthermore, and perhaps more significantly from a learner autonomy perspective, students are afforded
greater responsibility and agency to learn autonomously and to take direct charge of their academic progress
and intellectual development. The flexibility inherent in VBL allows learners who require further exposure or
who encounter initial comprehension difficulties to easily repeat and systematically relearn the videos they
have previously watched, fostering a more personalised and self-directed learning trajectory. Conversely, those
who demonstrate greater confidence and mastery of the content can efficiently move forward to intensive
practice, application exercises, or comprehensive revision activities without being constrained by the pace of
traditional classroom instruction. This differentiated approach to learning, facilitated by VBL technologies,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4795
www.rsisinternational.org
addresses diverse learning needs and preferences within heterogeneous student populations more effectively
than one-size-fits-all pedagogical models.
Based on the data presented and analysed above, it becomes abundantly clear that the smartphones and tablets
age has constituted a momentous and transformative event in terms of knowledge acquisition, dissemination,
and transfer within our current and future educational landscape. The ubiquity of mobile devices has
fundamentally altered not only how students access information but also their expectations regarding the
format, delivery, and accessibility of educational content. This technological shift necessitates corresponding
adaptations in pedagogical approaches, with VBL representing a natural and logical response to these evolving
learner expectations and capabilities.
CONCLUSION
Video-based learning is demonstrably here to stay as a permanent feature of modern pedagogy, and the holistic
experience of learning through videos will quite likely become progressively more interactive, immersive,
personalised, and engaging in the immediate and foreseeable future. This research has illuminated the
multifaceted benefits of VBL within tertiary education contexts, demonstrating its effectiveness in supporting
flipped classroom methodologies, enhancing learner autonomy, and facilitating more efficient use of instructor
contact time. The transition towards video-mediated learning represents not merely a technological upgrade
but a fundamental reconceptualisation of how knowledge can be transmitted, accessed, and internalised within
Higher Education 5.0 frameworks. The findings underscore the critical importance of institutional investment
in high-quality video content development and the professional development of academic staff in creating and
integrating such resources effectively within their pedagogical repertoires. As universities and tertiary
institutions continue to navigate the evolving landscape of digital education, VBL stands as a cornerstone
technology that bridges traditional academic rigour with contemporary student expectations and technological
capabilities. The promise of Higher Education 5.0 is fulfilled through sustained exposure to innovative digital
pedagogies and genuine immersion in technologically enhanced learning environments that prepare tertiary-
level students for an increasingly digitalised professional world.
Moreover, the implications extend beyond immediate pedagogical concerns to encompass broader questions of
educational equity, accessibility, and inclusivity. Video-based resources, when designed thoughtfully and
deployed strategically, possess the potential to democratise access to high-quality educational content,
transcending geographical and temporal barriers that have historically constrained learning opportunities. As
institutions continue to refine and expand their VBL offerings, attention must remain focused on maintaining
academic integrity, ensuring content quality, and supporting diverse learner needs within increasingly
heterogeneous student populations. Looking forward, the trajectory of VBL within Higher Education 5.0
appears both promising and inevitable. The convergence of technological advancement, pedagogical
innovation, and evolving learner expectations suggests that video-mediated learning will continue to occupy a
central position within tertiary education ecosystems. Institutions that embrace this transformation
thoughtfully, investing in quality content development whilst maintaining focus on sound pedagogical
principles, will be best positioned to serve the educational needs of contemporary and future student cohorts in
an increasingly digital and interconnected world.
REFERENCES
1. Adnan, A. H. M. (2013a). Language use and identity construction in a ‘micro-community’ of Malay
undergraduates. In R. Machart, C. B. Lim, S. N. Lim, & E. Yamato (eds.), Intersecting Identities and
Interculturality: Discourse and Practice (pp. 91-110). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
2. Adnan, A. H. M. (2013b). Language use and workplace participation in the identity construction of
Bumiputera Malay undergraduates in Malaysia (unpublished Doctor of Philosophy thesis). University
of Auckland, New Zealand.
3. Adnan, A. H. M., & Zamari, Z. M. (2012a). “I am a Techno-Rebel!” Malaysian Academics & their
Personal Experiences of Progressing into e-Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 61-
72.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4796
www.rsisinternational.org
4. Adnan, A. H. M., & Zamari, Z. M. (2012b). Computer-Aided Self-Access Language Learning: Views
of Indonesian, Malaysian & New Zealand Practitioners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67,
49-60.
5. Adnan, A. H. M., Ahmad, M. K., Yusof, A. A., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Mustafa Kamal, N. N. (2019).
English Language Simulations Augmented with 360-degrees spherical videos (ELSA 360°- Videos):
‘Virtual Reality’ real life learning! In MNNF Publisher (Ed.), Leading Towards Creativity &
Innovation (Series 1) (pp. 82.88). MNNF Publisher.
6. Ahmad, M. K., Adnan, A. H. M., Azamri, N. M., Idris, K. B., Norafand, N. N., & Ishak, N. I. (2019).
Education 4.0 technologies for English language teaching and learning in the Malaysian context. Paper
presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019),
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
7. Ahmad, M. K., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Mustafa Kamal, N. N. (2019).
Using new technologies to teach English in Malaysia - issues and challenges. In MNNF Network (Ed.),
Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019
(pp. 203-207). MNNF Network.
8. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every
Day. Arlington, TX: ISTE.
9. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipping for mastery. Educational Leadership, 71(4), 24-29.
10. Chang, W. H., Yang, J. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2011). A keyword-based video summarization learning
platform with multimodal surrogates. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced
Learning Technologies (pp. 37-41). IEEE.
11. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model
instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
12. Chenail, R. J. (2011). YouTube as a qualitative research asset: Reviewing user generated videos as
learning resources. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 229-235.
13. Cuesta Medina, L. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 42-56.
14. DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped Classrooms: A Review of Key Ideas and
Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 144-151.
15. Donkor, F. (2011). Assessment of learner acceptance and satisfaction with video-based instructional
materials for teaching practical skills at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 12(5), 74-92.
16. Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A
design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment. TESL-EJ, 19(2), n2.
17. Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning
course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 13.
18. Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Krogstie, J. (2016). Exploring the relationship between video lecture
usage patterns and students' attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1259- 1275.
19. Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning.
20. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 81-96.
21. Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby. G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers balance
the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education:
Research, 13, 121-140.
22. Kanuka, H. (2007). A principled approach to facilitating distance education: The Internet, higher
education and higher levels of learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance
Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 17(2), 70-86.
23. Kanuka, H., & Rourke, L. (2013). Using Blended Learning Strategies to Address Teaching
Development Needs: How Does Canada Compare? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(3), 19-
35.
24. Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A Blended Learning Study on Implementing Video Recorded Speaking Tasks in
Task-Based Classroom Instruction. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4),
1-13.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4797
www.rsisinternational.org
25. McLaughlin, J., Roth, M., Glatt, D., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D.
A., & Mumper, R. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and
Engagement in a Health Professions School. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236243.
26. Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the Classroom to Improve
Student Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599.
27. Moffett, J., & Mill, A. (2014). Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary
professional skills course. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 415-425.
28. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2017). Learning English (and Arabic) in Malaysian Islamic Schools: Language
use and the construction of identities. Arab World English Journal, 8(2), 407-420.
29. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2018). Industry 4.0 skill sets, higher-order thinking skills and gamification:
Lessons from ‘Potentia Project’, Malaysia (Plenary Panel Presentation). Proceedings from TING X
2018: The Tenth National Meeting of Teachers (Temu Ilmiah Nasional Guru) ‘Innovation in Education
for Indonesia 4.0’. Universitas Terbuka Indonesia.
30. Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2019). Education 4.0 technologies, Industry 4.0 skills and the critical roles of
inventors, innovators and developers. [Plenary] Paper presented at the International Invention,
Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
31. Mohd Adnan, A. H., Ya Shak, M. S., Karim, R. A., Tahir, M. H. M., & Shah, D. S. M. (2020). 360-
degree videos, VR experiences and the application of Education 4.0 technologies in Malaysia for
exposure and immersion. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. Journal, 5(1), 373-381.
32. Mohd Kamal, M. A., Adnan, A. H. M., Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Ahmad, M. K., & Yusof, A. A. (2019).
60 seconds ‘Video-based Learning’ to facilitate Flipped Classrooms and Blended Learning at a
Malaysian university. In MNNF Network (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Invention, Innovative
& Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019 (pp. 118-127). MNNF Network.
33. Mohd, K. N., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Ahmad, M. K., & Mohd Kamal, M. A. (2019). Teaching
Arabic language to Malaysian university students using education technologies based on Education 4.0
principles. Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC
Series 2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
34. Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Adnan, A. H. M., Yusof, A. A., Ahmad, M. K., & Mohd Kamal, M. A. (2019).
‘Immersive Interactive Educational Experiences’ adopting Education 5.0, Industry 4.0 learning
technologies for Malaysian universities. In MNNF Network (Ed.), Proceedings of the International
Invention, Innovative & Creative (InIIC) Conference, Series 1/2019 (pp. 190-196). MNNF Network.
35. Pang, Y. (2010). Improving hybrid learning of physical education by video review. In International
Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 230-239). Springer.
36. Qiao, Q., & Beling, P. A. (2011). Classroom video assessment and retrieval via multiple instance
learning. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 272-279). Springer:
Berlin.
37. Reynard, R. (2007). Hybrid Learning: Challenges for teachers. https://thejournal.com/
articles/2007/05/17/hybrid-learning-challenges-for-teachers.aspx
38. Santikarn, B., & Wichadee, S. (2018). Flipping the Classroom for English Language Learners: A Study
of Learning Performance and Perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,
13(09), 123-135.
39. Shih, R. C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second
language student. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883-897.
40. Smyth, R. (2011). Enhancing learnerlearner interaction using video communications in higher
education: Implications from theorising about a new model. British Journal of Educational Technology,
42(1), 113-127.
41. Sojayapan, C., & Khlaisang, J. (2018). The effect of a flipped classroom with online group
investigation on students' team learning ability. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences (in press).
42. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and
task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
43. Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V. & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and
learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58, 19-37.
44. Van Zanten, R., Somogyi, S. & Curro, G. (2012). Purpose and preference in educational podcasting.
45. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 130-138.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 4798
www.rsisinternational.org
46. Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review
and future perspectives. Int. J. Adv. Life Sci, 6(3/4), 122-135.
47. Yusof, A. A., Adnan, A. H. M., Mustafa Kamal, N. N., Mohd Kamal, M. A., & Ahmad, M. K. (2019).
Education 4.0 immersive learning with Spherical Videos (360°) and Virtual Reality (VR) experiences.
Paper presented at the International Invention, Innovative & Creative Conference (InIIC Series
2/2019), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
48. Zamari, Z. M., & Adnan, A. H. M. (2011). Fusing CALL with SALL: The Good English Language
Learner community on Facebook as a case in point. English Language Journal (UPSI Sultan Idris
Education University), 4, 126-146.