Page 4799
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Dialogic Reading Strategy for Enhancing Caregivers’ Involvement in
Children’s Reading Development in Kazaure Local Government,
Jigawa State
Professor Talatu Musa Garba, Professor Amina Adamu, Dr. A’isha Umar, Dr. Bello Shehu Abdullahi &
Dr. Muhammad Sulaiman Abdullahi
Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000396
Received: 12 October 2025; Accepted: 20 October 2025; Published: 13 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Reading is an essential component of literacy and the children’s ability to read in the early grades contribute
significantly to their academic achievement. As such, caregivers are expected to play a prominent role that will
facilitate the reading abilities of their children. This research sets out to provide caregivers with strategies that
would enable them to be actively involved in the reading activities of their children. Thirty six (36) children
were selected randomly among lower basic level and their corresponding caregivers made up the sample of the
research making a total of seventy two (72) respondents. A pre-test was administered on the students to
determine the baseline data on their reading abilities while interviews were conducted to determine their
caregivers` literacy level. The intervention involved training of the caregivers on reading strategies they can
adopt to support their children. A period of six weeks was given to the caregivers to apply the strategies on
their children while the researchers monitored the activities weekly. A post-test was also administered on the
children after the intervention. The results were analyzed quantitatively using SPSS software package. The
findings revealed that children whose caregivers involved themselves in their studies performed better than
those with low involvement. The findings further revealed that both the students and caregivers who were
exposed to dialogic reading have great improvement on their reading ability.
INTRODUCTION
Generally, most low-income parents do not themselves, read, let alone read to their children (Martı
n-Loeches
et al, 2004). Researches on the impact of parental involvement on their children’s academic progress have
attested to the major role parents play in the academic success of their children (Epstein, 1984, 1987,
Henderson, 1987, 1988). In relation to the impact of parents’ involvement in the reading abilities of their
children, a number of researches have consistently shown positive effects on their children’s reading
development at home (Bean, Southworth, Keebler and Topping, 1986, 1987).
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, 1992) results indicate higher levels of reading
achievement among students who had literacy related interactions within their families, than students who
have few or no such interactions. Despite this proven success, few schools show keen interest in involving
parents in the reading programmes of their children (Rasinki,1989b). A number of scholars (Epstein and Baker
1982, Holsinger, 1979; Rasinski and Fredericks, 1989; Roling, 1981; Walde and Baker 1990) has studied the
unwillingness of parents to take responsibility for the education of their children.
Caregivers involvement has been described by researchers as a variety of activities that allow parents and other
caregivers to participate in the educational process of their children at home and in school. Activities such as
information exchange, decision sharing, volunteer services for schools, home tutoring/teaching, and
child/school advocacy could be used to involve caregivers in school learning, Tarraga, Garcia and Reyes,
(2017). Parental involvement as the activities occurring between a parent and a child or between a parent and
teachers at school that may contribute to the child’s educational outcomes and development. However,
findings of some researches have indicated the willingness of many parents to work with teachers and schools
Page 4800
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
to help their children to succeed academically, Charvkin and Williams, (1985); Rasinski and Fredericks,
(1989).
Most Nigerian families are interested in providing education for their children, but unlike the caregivers in the
developed nations of the world, Nigerian parents are not known to devote appreciable level of interest in the
daily performance of their children at school. There are no available literature or research evidence to counter
the view that Nigerian caregivers do not show sufficient interest in promoting to a high degree, parental
participation in the daily school work of their children/ward in order to bring about improvement in their
reading achievements. This research trained parents on the strategies they could use to get actively involved in.
Problem Statement/Justification
Studies have found strong correlation between caregivers involvement and literacy development Anderson,
(2000); Wright, (2004); Hawes, Plourde, (2005). When caregivers are actively involved in their children’s
reading activities, by consistently reading to, or with them, reading skills may improve. The interaction that
occurs between the caregivers and children may play a significant role in children's overall reading skills
development. However, there is poor record of parents’ involvement in enhancing the reading abilities of their
children in Nigeria, (Iroegbu & Igweike, 2020). The reasons could be attributed to insufficient time for
caregivers to work with their children, parents’ lack of motivation to implement learning activities with their
children, inadequate instructional materials and training support from the schools or even lack of awareness of
the various ways they could be involved. This research is addressing this problem by providing training and
support to the caregivers, on how to utilise the Dialogic strategy in getting actively involved in the reading
activities of their children.
Objective(s) of the Study
The main objective is to assess the effectiveness of the Dialogic Reading Strategy in enhancing the caregivers’
involvement in children’s reading development, using Kazaure local government area of Jigawa State, as a
case study. The specific objectives are:
1. To investigate the level of caregivers’ involvement in their children’s reading at the early grade,
2. To determine the reading abilities of the children of the sampled caregivers,
3. To deploy the dialogic strategy to the caregivers of the children,
4. To examine the efficacy of the Dialogic Reading Strategy on the students reading ability.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Despite the importance of reading and writing as components for the literacy attainment of primary school
pupils, a lot of primary school pupils are experiencing great difficulty in acquiring the reading skills. Rasinki
(1994) maintained that assessing the reading ability of children and giving them the right intervention at the
appropriate time is paramount because difficulties in developing proficiency in the early grade can lead to
severe academic difficulties throughout the students’ schooling. Similarly, Kennedy, Birman and Demacaine
(1986) have also been proven through research that once the child has gone beyond the third grade (primary
three), efforts aimed at alleviating reading difficulties for him/her are seldom successful. Research conducted
in the Northern Nigeria to assess the reading ability of pupils in primary 1-3 in the Hausa language shows that
most students at primary 2 in Bauchi and Sokoto could not read in Hausa. Desforges & Abouchaar (2003), and
Jeyes (2016), maintained that parental involvement has a significant effect on children’s achievement and
adjustment. In addition, higher academic achievement and greater cognitive competence, parental involvement
leads to greater problem-solving skills development, greater school enjoyment, better school attendance, fewer
behavioural problems at school, and greater social and emotional development are feasible. Parental
involvement has the benefits of higher test scores and grades, better attendance, increased levels of completed
homework, and motivation. Numerous supplementary and preventive instructions/efforts aimed at providing
Page 4801
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
intervention to children with reading difficulties at the early grade have been designed by experts in the
reading field, Rasinki (1994). The problem is how can this additional support be accommodated in the already
prepared school curriculum? This is where the intervention or involvement of the caregivers comes in.
Dialogic Reading (DR) is an evidenced-based approach to shared book reading. Adults use these strategies to
actively engage a child during story time. The goal of DR is for the child to become the storyteller and for the
adult to facilitate, respond, and expand the child’s verbalizations. For example, parents are taught to ask the
child “who,” “what,”, “where” and when” questions as opposed to questions requiring “yes” and “no”
answers. Providing caregivers with examples of various effective storytelling strategies will enhance
storytelling quality which encourages children to stay engaged and get excited, (Huag & Doleis, 2007). Many
caregivers are frustrated with storybook time when their children do not respond enthusiastically.
Reading is one of the most important sources of information to human beings. It is an action word with the
three domains of Bloom’s taxonomy: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains. Yurtbakan, Erdogan &
Erdogan (2021), supported the fact that reading begins with receiving message from the written source and
ends with establishing meaning in the mind, where the process begins with most cognitive and psychomotor
dimensions at the forefront and motivation playing a key role as a driving force in mobilizing the individual at
the affective dimension of Bloom’s taxonomy.
Similarly, Lerner (2000) expressed the view that early literacy is the acquainting of children to books, stories,
and poems at an early age, mostly by parents at preschool level. (Doyle, 2004; Gupta, 2009, Whitehurst &
Lonigan (2001) unanimously maintained that early literacy is all the prerequisite knowledge, skills and
attitudes that children are expected to acquire regarding literacy in the periods before they start formal
education. From the above, it is possible to say early literacy skills are predictors of early reading skills, which
the parents play a significant role in its inculcation. Parents need to support their children’s literacy
development from the first years of life, which will enable them to acquire many skills as bases for literacy,
Nelson, (2005); Kargin, Guldenoglu, & Ergǚl, (2017).
From what obtains, Dialogic Reading is a process in which the child’s verbal language skills and vocabulary
are to be developed through reading books interactively by both children and caregivers, Whitehurst, Epstein
et al., (1994). Roles are exchanged between the caregivers and the children with the guidance of the adult
caregivers. In both scenarios, listening and asking questions are the key activities involved during Dialogic
Reading. Reading together with children right in the home environment by the caregivers or parents is the most
effective method that supports Dialogic Reading.
Researches on Dialogic Reading indicated that the parents and caregivers should support early literacy skills in
the preschool period, because the skills positively affect reading. It was also observed that children who
routinely participate in reading activities with adults in the preschool period, are most successful in language
skills (Yuzbasioğlu & Akyol, 2022).
Yurtbakan, Erdogan & Erdogan (2021) observed that studies have been conducted with the aim of assessing
the contribution of Dialogic Reading to the relationship between family and child. Furthermore, various studies
have been conducted to determine how teachers have realized the importance of dialogic reading. The teachers
are responsible for the application of dialogic reading, and they must have knowledge about its features and
principles, which will enable them to structure the process successfully for the achievement of the stated
objectives.
The Dialogic Reading (DR) strategy, developed by Whitehurst et al. (1988), has been widely acknowledged as
a transformative tool for fostering parental involvement in children’s reading development. At its core, DR
involves an interactive, dialogic process where parents actively engage their children through questioning,
elaboration, and narrative participation during shared reading sessions. This strategy, in its real sense, aligns
with Vygotskys (1978) sociocultural theory, which emphasises that learning occurs most effectively within
the zone of proximal development (ZPD) when guided by more knowledgeable others. Notably, researches
(Lonigan and Whitehurst (1998), Aram (2006) have demonstrated that DR functions well in the enhancement
of children’s vocabulary acquisition, narrative skills, and overall literacy development. For instance, they
Page 4802
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
emphasized that the interactive nature of DR fosters cognitive engagement, thereby enabling children to co-
construct knowledge with their caregivers. This co-construction, according to them, has been shown to
stimulate deeper linguistic processing compared to traditional read-aloud practices. However, as noted, the
efficacy of DR is highly contingent on parents’ ability to adopt and sustain dialogic techniques, and this is a
challenge that is magnified in contexts with limited parental literacy, such as rural Nigeria like Kazaure Local
Government area in Jigawa State.
In the sub-Saharan African context, while Adetola, Aderinoye, & Rogers (2021) observed that structured
parental literacy programmes in Nigerian communities, significantly enhance both parental confidence and
children’s literacy outcomes, Aderinoye and Rogers (2005) had earlier highlighted that integrating culturally
relevant content into DR practices increases parental engagement and ensures the sustainability of such
interventions. For the present study, therefore, there is the need for tailored DR approaches in Kazaure, where
cultural and socio-economic factors might influence parental participation.
Additionally, the role of parental agency in literacy development has been further emphasised in recent global
studies. For instance, Mol, Bus, de Jong & Smeets (2008) conducted a meta-analysis revealing that the depth
of parent-child interaction during DR session was more critical for literacy gains than the frequency of reading.
This argument aligned with Hargrave and Sénéchal’s (2000) findings that DR functions both in the
improvement of vocabulary and enhancement of emergent literacy skills such as phonological awareness.
However, their argument cautions that the success of DR depends on parents receiving adequate training to
facilitate meaningful and reflective dialogues with their children. As such, the application of DR strategies in
Kazaure Local Government is relevant to parents in order to ensure meaningful results.
In the same vein, studies have also highlighted the relevance of DR in mitigating educational disparities during
crises. Kim and Quinn (2020), for example, examined literacy practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and
found that households employing dialogic strategies experienced less pronounced learning losses. This
reinforced the potential of DR to address literacy gaps in regions like Northern Nigeria, where there is
inadequate educational infrastructure. However, contextual adaptation remains a key factor that must be
considered in DR practices within the local linguistic and cultural contexts, Tadesse, Samuel and Tesfaye
(2022).
While DR democratises literacy by positioning parents as co-educators, it also challenges deeply entrenched
hierarchies in education. It should be recalled that Whitehurst (1992) has argued that DR disrupts the
traditional teacher-centred model by fostering a more participatory and inclusive approaches to learning,
thereby emphasizing the learner-centred approach. Furthermore, Aderinoye, Tade and Smith (2007) pointed
out, achieving this paradigm shift in rural setting requires sustained community sensitisation and support. As
such, the implementation of DR in Kazaure must therefore transcend procedural training to address underlying
perceptions of literacy as an institutional rather than a communal endeavour.
Research Methodology
The study covered selected primary school pupils in Kazaure Local Government, Jigawa State, Nigeria. Mixed
method research was employed in the conduct of the study. The population of the study comprised of 31 pupils
and their caregivers in the study area. Appropriate sample was purposively selected from both categories of the
population (i.e. pupils and their caregivers). Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) was administered on
the pupils to determine their reading ability. The caregivers of the students were interviewed to determine their
level of literacy and involvement in the reading development of their children. The caregivers of the 31
selected children received training on how to use the Dialogic Reading Strategy to enhance their involvement
in the reading development of their children. The caregivers were also trained and required to apply the
strategy on the children for six weeks, after which a post-test assessment was administered on the students to
determine the impact of the strategy on them.
Page 4803
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
What is the level of parental involvement in the early reading grade among Primary school pupils in
Kazaure?
Table 1: Care Givers Involvement in their Wards Reading Activity
Levels
Scores
Frequency
Percentage
10.00
2
18.2
Low
11.00
1
9.1
12.00
8
72.7
Total
11
100
13.00
7
33.3
High
14.00
14
66.7
Total
21
100
Table 1 shows the results for parental involvement in children’s early reading grade. The findings revealed that
parents with high level of involvement in early reading grade accounted for 21 respondents representing 66%
while parents with low level of involvement accounted for 11 respondents representing 34%. The finding
indicates that parents that involved in early reading grade were the majority in the study.
What are the levels of reading abilities of the primary school Pupils in Kazaure?
Table 2: Reading Abilities
Abilities
N
Min
Max
Mean
SD
AVG Mean
Expression
31
.00
4.00
1.1613
1.31901
Prosody
31
.00
4.00
1.2258
1.38347
1.14
Automacity
31
.00
3.00
1.0968
1.16490
Rate
31
.00
4.00
1.0968
1.22079
Table 2 indicates the levels of reading abilities among children in the sampled schools before the Dialogic
Strategy intervention. The findings revealed that children high reading abilities in Expression (M = 1.16; SD
=1.31) and Prosody (M = 1.22; SD =1.38) reading abilities more than in Automacity (M = 1.09; SD =1.16)
and Rate (M = 1.09; SD = 1.22) components.
What is the efficacy of the Dialogic Strategy on reading ability of primary school pupils in Kazaure?
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for the effect of Dialogic Strategy on Reading Abilities
Group
Reading Abilities
N
Min
Max
Mean
Std. Dev
Pretest
Expression
31
.00
4.00
1.0000
1.28730
Page 4804
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Prosody
31
.00
4.00
1.0556
1.35107
Automacity
31
.00
3.00
.9444
1.14504
Rate
31
.00
4.00
.9444
1.19390
Posttest
Expression
31
1.00
4.00
3.1613
1.12833
Prosody
31
1.00
4.00
2.9677
1.01600
Automacity
31
1.00
4.00
3.0323
1.07963
Rate
31
1.00
4.00
2.9677
1.07963
Table 3 shows the results for the efficacy of the Dialogic Strategy on students’ Reading abilities among
children in sampled schools. The findings revealed that Dialogic Strategy has improved on students’ Reading
abilities in the area of Expression (M = 3.16 and 1.05; SD =1.12 and 1.35),
Prosody (M = 2.96 and 1.05; SD = 1.01 and 1.35), Automacity (M = 3.03 and .944; SD = 1.07 and 1.14) and
Rate (M =2.96 and .944; SD = 1.07 and 1.19) components of reading abilities with intervention of Dialogic
Strategy
What is the difference in the efficacy of Dialogic Reading Strategy on students’ reading abilities between
male and female children in primary school in Kazaure?
Table 4: Mean, SD, t and p Values for the efficacy of Dialogic Reading Strategy on students’ Reading
abilities between male and female children
Reading Fluency
Gender
N
Mean
Std. Dev
t
p
Expression
Male
13
3.2308
1.01274
.287
.776
Female
18
3.1111
1.23140
Prosody
Male
13
3.1538
.80064
.867
.395
Female
18
2.8333
1.15045
Automacity
Male
13
3.0769
1.03775
.193
.849
Female
18
3.0000
1.13759
Rate
Male
13
3.1538
.89872
.811
.424
Female
18
2.8333
1.20049
Table 4 shows the results for independent t-test for the difference in the efficacy of Dialogic Reading Strategy
on students’ Reading abilities between male and female primary school children in Kazaure. The result shows
that, no significant difference was found in the efficacy of Dialogic reading Strategy on reading abilities
between male and female children on Expression (M = 3.23 and 3.11; SD = 1.01 and 1.23), Prosody (M = 3.15
and 2.83; SD =.800 and 1.15), Automacity (M = 3.07 and 3.00; SD = 1.03 and 1.13) and Rate (M = 3.15 and
2.83; SD = .898 and 1.20), indicating that posttest mean scores of efficacy of the Dialogic Reading Strategy on
students’ reading abilities do not vary significantly between male and female primary school children of the
sampled schools.
Page 4805
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
DISCUSSION
The findings revealed that children whose parents are involved in their study are likely to perform better than
those with low involvement. The findings further revealed that parents engaged in support component of
involvement leading to the development of reading culture thereby making school children to become fluent in
English language. The study further justifies that parental involvement is one of the essential elements for
educational improvement that connects home and school as highlighted by Brinkley (1992). Moreover, the
present study is in support of Review of Educational Research (1997) that identified three major factors of
parental involvement in the education of their children that comprise of (1) beliefs about what is important,
mandatory and tolerable to do on behalf of the children (2) the degree to which parents believe that they have
positive influence on the education of their children and (3) perceived that the children and the school they
attend want parents to get involved.
Traditionally, parental involvement in education is perceived to deal with contribution to home-based
academic activities (e.g. homework), school-based (attending PTA meetings) (Olatonye & Ogunkola, 2008),
however, in modern time, parental involvement manifest in the parents’ interest in school activities and active
participation in school work of children (Uzoechina & Obidike, 2008).
In terms of the levels of reading abilities, the findings show that children have high reading abilities in the area
of expression and prosody compared to automacity and rate components. This indicates that the children were
lagging behind in the area of reading ability prior to intervention.
However, findings involving efficacy of Dialogic strategy on reading abilities revealed that the technique is
effective in promoting reading abilities among children. Dialogic strategy was found to have significantly
improved all reading ability components expression, prosody, automacity and rate. The findings therefore
indicate that Dialogic strategy is a good intervention strategy that could be employed to enhance reading
ability thereby promoting reading culture among children.
Although Dialogic strategy is effective in enhancing reading abilities among children, it was found that the
effect does not vary between male and female school children, indicating both male and female children
experience uniform improvement in all reading ability components when treated with the strategy.
REFERENCES
1. Aderinoye, R., & Rogers, P. (2005). Culturally relevant strategies for enhancing parental involvement in
children's education in rural Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(2), 75-89.
2. Aderinoye, R., Tade, O., & Smith, D. (2007). Understanding the role of parental involvement in rural
education settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(1), 22-34.
3. Adetola, A., Aderinoye, R., & Rogers, P. (2021). The impact of structured parental literacy programs on
literacy development in Nigerian communities. African Journal of Education and Development, 7(3),
45-60.
4. Anderson, S.A. (2000). “How Parental Involvement Makes a Difference in Reading Achievement”.
Reading Improvement, 3 7(2), 61-86.
5. Aram, D. (2006). The role of parents in early literacy development in rural communities. Educational
Psychology Review, 18(2), 127-139.
6. Brinkley, E. H. (1992). Early English Language Arts Evaluation and the Evolution of" New-Type"
Tests. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 8(1), 6.
7. Chavkin, N. F. & Williams, D. L. (1985). Executive Summary of the Final Report: Parent Involvement
in Education Project. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
8. Desforges, C. & Abouchaar, A. (2003). “The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and
Family Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment: A Literature Review”. London: Department
for Education and Skills
9. Doyle, A. (2004). A family literacy program with varying participation structures: Effects on parents
and child learning (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Toronto.
Page 4806
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
10. Epstein, J. L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and urban
society, 19(2), 119-136.
11. Gupta, M. S. (2009). Early Childhood Care and Education. PHI Learning Private Limited.
12. Hannon, P. (1987), “A Study of the Effects of Parental Involvement in the Teaching of Reading on
Children’s Reading Test Performance”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 57, Issue1.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044.8279.1987.tb03061.x Accessed on 04/02/2023.
13. Hargrave, A. C., & Sénéchal, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of dialogic reading: Effects on early literacy
skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(1), 75-90.
14. Hawes, C. A., & Plourde, L. A. (2005). Parental involvement and its influence on the reading
achievement of 6th grade students. Reading Improvement, 42(1), 47.
15. Henderson Jr, J. G. (1987). Effects of depression upon reading: A case for distinguishing effortful from
automatic processes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64(1), 191-200.
16. Henderson, H. (1987). Reading by ear. Chicago Reader.
17. Holsinger, K.G. {1979). “Effects of a short-term Title parent involvement program in reading using
parent help packets in the home”. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 95-A. {University Microfilms
No. 8016542)
18. Huag, G. Dr. & Doleis, B. Med. (2007). “Reading Theatre, Parents as Actors: Movie Production in a
Family Literacy Workshop. Reading Improvement, (87-98).
19. Iroegbu, V. I. and Igweike, O. M. (2020), “Effect of Parental Involvement on the Reading Skills of
Pupils in Lower Primary School in Ondo State”, Nigeria Journal of Education and Social Policy. Vol 7,
No 4.
20. Jeynes, W. H. (2016). “A Meta Analysis: The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Latino
Students Outcomes”, Education and Urban Society 49, 4 28. DOI:10.117/0013124516630596.
21. Kargin, T., Guldenoglu, B., & Ergul, C. (2017). Early Literacy Profile of Kindergarten Children: Ankara
Sample. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Science Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 6187.
https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelogretimdergisi.299868
22. Kennedy, M. M., Birman, B. F., & Demaline, R. (1986). The Effectiveness of Chapter 1 Services,
Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
23. Kim, M., & Quinn, D. M. (2020). Resilient learning during the pandemic: The role of parental
involvement and dialogic reading in literacy outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 28(3), 201-218.
24. Lerner, J. (2000). Learning Disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (8th ed.). Houghton
Mifflin College Div.
25. Lonigan, C. J., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1998). The role of parent-child interactions in early literacy
development. Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 693-703.
26. Loera, G., Rueda, R., Nakamoto, J. (2011), The Association between Parental Involvement in Reading
and Schooling and Children’s Reading Engagement in Latino Families”, Literacy Research and
Instruction.
27. Martı
n-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Casado, P., Muñoz, F., & Fernández-Frıas, C. (2004).
Electrophysiological evidence of an early effect of sentence context in reading. Biological Psychology,
65(3), 265-280.
28. Mol, S. E., Bus, A. G., de Jong, M. T., & Smeets, D. J. H. (2008). The effect of early shared reading on
children’s vocabulary and story comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 269-
292.
29. Nelson, P. A. (2005). Could You or Your Students Use a Poetry Get Away? The Reading Teacher,
58(8), 771773. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.8.7
30. Rasinski, T. V. (1994). Fast Start: A Parental Involvement Reading Program for Primary Grade
Students.
31. Rasinski, T.V. (1989b). “Reading and the Empowerment of Parents”. The Reading Teacher, 43, 226-
231.
32. Rasinski, T.V., & Fredericks, A.D. (1989). “What Do Parents Think about Reading in the Schools”. The
Reading Teacher, 43, 260-261.
33. Tadesse, S., Samuel, J., & Tesfaye, D. (2022). Adapting dialogic reading strategies to low-resource
contexts: A case study from Ethiopia. Journal of Literacy and Education, 33(4), 109-124.
Page 4807
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
34. Tarraga V, Garcia, B. and Reyes, J. (2017). Home Based Family Involvement and Academic
Achievement: A Case Study in Primary Educational Studies. Educational Studies, 44, 361 375.
Doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1373C36.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard
University Press.
36. Walde, A.C. & Baker, K. (1990). How Teachers View the Parents' Role in Education. Phi Delta
Kappan, 72, 319-321.
37. Whitehurst, G. J. (1992). Dialogic reading: An interactive model of early literacy development. In G. J.
Whitehurst (Ed.), Children's language and education (pp. 157-185). Academic Press.
38. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from Pre-Readers to
Readers. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Development (pp. 1129).
Guilford Press.
39. Yurttbakan, E., Erdogan, O., & Erdogan, T. (2021). Impact of Dialogic Reading on Reading Motivation.
Journal of Edu & Science, Vol 46.
40. Yuzbasilu, Y., & Akyol, C. (2022). The Effect of a Dialogic Reading Program on the Early Literacy
Skills of Children in Preschool Period. Education Quarterly Reviews, Vol 5 Special Issue 2: Current
Education Research in Turkey, 557563. DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.643
41. “Definition of Parental Involvement” [Internet]. Accessed on 13
th
February 2023; Available at
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/education/definition-of-parental-involvement-
educationessay.php?vref=1.
REFERENCES
Brinkley (1992)
Olatonye and Ogunkola (2008)
Uzoechina and Obidike (2008)
Hinojo, S.A et al, (2004)
Epstein, (1984, 1987),
Henderson, (1987, 1988)
Bean, Southworth, Keebler and Topping, (1986, 1987)
Epstein and Baker (1982)
UK Essay (2018) citing Al-Awabdeh, (2011)
Wright, (2004);
Hawes, Plourde, (2005)
Brinkley (1992)
Olatonye and Ogunkola, (2008)
Uzoechina and Obidike, (2008)