culturally grounded counseling practices. By integrating cultural awareness with emotional education,
practitioners can help couples balance social obligations with genuine emotional connection.
Several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the cross-sectional design restricts causal inference. Second,
the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential response and social desirability biases. Third, the
relatively low explanatory power (R² = .06) indicates that additional variables, such as socio-economic stress,
family involvement, and digital media use, may also influence marital bonding.
Future research should therefore employ longitudinal or mixed method designs to capture temporal changes
and deeper insights into emotional dynamics. Expanding the sample to include rural populations and
incorporating qualitative interviews would further enrich understanding by revealing context-specific
meanings of intimacy and withdrawal within collectivist frameworks.
REFERENCES
1. Abdullah, T., Haq, A.U., & Khan, M.I. (2023). Work–family conflict and emotional well‑being among
policewomen in Pakistan. Annals of Social Sciences and Perspective, 4(2), 331-340.
2. Akram, Z., & Khan, S.Y. (2020). Tracing the determinants of marital quality in Pakistani society
through the lens of How It Happened. Global Language Review, 5(2), 115–126.
3. Ali, M.A., & Saleem, S. (2022). Family communication and marital satisfaction: A mediating role of
emotion regulation. Rawal Medical Journal, 47(3), 677-680.
4. Arshad, A., & Imran, H. (2022). Partner phubbing, romantic jealousy and marital satisfaction among
married individuals. Applied Psychology Review, 1(2), 1-16.
5. Ayub, N., Iqbal, S., Halford, W.K., & van de Vijver, F. (2023). Couples relationship standards and
satisfaction in Pakistani couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 111-128.
6. Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction:
More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144.
7. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (R.G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original
work published 1923)
8. Caughlin, J.P., & Huston, T.L. (2002). Demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal
Relationships, 9(1), 95-119.
9. Chadha, L., Sharma, P., Kaur, R., Arya, I., & Sharma, P. (2025). The impact of social media addiction
on self-esteem and life satisfaction among married couples. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary
Care, 14(4), 1494-1501.
10. Farooq, Z., Akhtar, N., & Zacchilli, T. (2024). Validation of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale (RPCS)
in Pakistani married couples: Establishing measurement invariance. Interpersona: An International
Journal on Personal Relationships, 18(1), 79–103.
11. Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal
of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630–649.
12. Gottman, J.M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide
from the country’s foremost relationship expert. New York: Three Rivers Press.
13. Gottman, J.M., & Schwartz-Gottman, J. (2022). The love prescription: Seven days to more intimacy,
connection, and joy. New York: Penguin Life.
14. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
15. Jolin, S., Lafontaine, M.-F., Lussier, Y., & Brassard, A. (2022). How relationship satisfaction and
negative communication trajectories change in emerging adults’ dating relationships: a group-based
dual trajectory analysis. Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 482-496.
16. Lebow, J., & Snyder, D.K. (2022). Couple therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging
developments. Family Process, 61(4), 1359-1385.
17. Lu, L., Wilder, S., & Prager, K.J. (2025). Intimacy reduces withdrawal after conflict in cohabiting
couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(6), 1102-1123.
18. Markman, H.J., & Rhoades, G.K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future
directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 169–200.