INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5536
www.rsisinternational.org
Emotional Orientation, Emotional Disconnectedness, and Marital
Bonding: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study of Married Couples
in Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
Shaiba Arooj & Lukman Z. M.
Faculty of Applied Social Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000453
Received: 22 October 2025; Accepted: 28 October 2025; Published: 15 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Marriage remains a fundamental institution sustaining social stability, yet its success largely depends on the
quality of emotional exchanges between spouses. This study examines the effects of emotional orientation and
emotional disconnectedness on marital bonding within a South Asian context. A cross-sectional survey was
conducted among 700 married respondents in Muzaffarabad using structured Likert-scale questionnaires. The
measures assessed emotional orientation, emotional disconnectedness, disagreement, emotional well-being,
and marital bonding, each operationalized as the mean of multiple indicators. Data was analyzed using chi-
square tests, Pearson’s correlations, and multiple regression in SPSS. Results revealed significant associations
among the variables. Emotional orientation was positively correlated with marital bonding (r = .10, p < .01),
whereas emotional disconnectedness and disagreement were negatively correlated (r = .20, p < .01; r = .88, p
< .01). Regression analysis indicated that emotional disconnectedness was the strongest negative predictor of
marital bonding (β = –.44, p < .001), while emotional orientation emerged as a positive predictor (β = .28, p <
.001). The overall model explained 6% of the variance in marital bonding, F(2, 697) = 21.47, p < .001. These
findings underscore the critical role of emotional processes in sustaining marital ties, with emotional
withdrawal exerting a stronger negative effect than the positive influence of emotional orientation. The study
contributes to existing literature by offering empirical evidence from Pakistan, where marital expectations are
shaped by collectivist norms and socio-cultural obligations. Practical implications highlight the need for
marital counseling interventions that reduce emotional withdrawal while promoting positive emotional
orientation to strengthen spousal bonds.
Keywords: Marital Relationship Quality, Emotional Orientation, Emotional Disconnectedness, Marital
Bonding, South Asia
INTRODUCTION
Marriage remains one of the most enduring social institutions, forming the foundation of family life, emotional
support, companionship, and social regulation. Yet, its stability and quality depend largely on the emotional
processes within spousal interactions. Contemporary scholarship highlights emotional orientation, the capacity
for partners to engage with warmth, empathy, and responsiveness as a key determinant of marital stability. In
contrast, emotional disconnectedness, characterized by withdrawal and detachment, weakens marital bonds.
These dynamics are central to understanding marital bonding, which encompasses trust, closeness, and
emotional unity. In Western contexts, research consistently shows that emotional orientation predicts marital
satisfaction, intimacy, and resilience (Fincham & Beach, 2010; Markman & Rhoades, 2012). Conversely,
withdrawal and disengagement predict dissatisfaction and dissolution (Gottman & Silver, 1999; Lebow &
Snyder, 2022). Longitudinal studies further confirm that emotional attunement sustains marital quality across
time (Rosen et al., 2025), while disengagement accelerates breakdown (Meier et al., 2024).
In collectivist societies such as those in South Asia, cultural expectations add complexity. Marriages are often
embedded in networks of kinship, religious duties, and social obligations that prioritize family cohesion over
individual fulfillment. Pakistani spouses, for instance, report valuing family responsibility and religious
commitment more highly than Western couples (Ayub et al., 2023). Yet, expressions of affection and intimacy
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5537
www.rsisinternational.org
still remain strong predictors of satisfaction. This duality reflects that while collectivist norms define marital
roles, emotional connection remains universally vital. Our findings support this view: emotional orientation
enhances bonding, but its positive effect is often overshadowed by the stronger negative impact of withdrawal.
In cultures that emphasize togetherness, disengagement signals disloyalty and can be especially distressing a
pattern echoed in Nugrahani et al.’s (2025) Indonesian findings, where workfamily conflict undermined
satisfaction even when intimacy was high.
Despite growing recognition of these dynamics, South Asian marriages remain underexplored empirically.
Marital expectations are shaped by dyadic exchanges and broader collectivist norms. Evidence from Pakistan
shows that loyalty and cohesion are culturally emphasized, yet emotional intimacy and mutual support predict
marital satisfaction (Shujja & Adil, 2024). Structural pressures, such as economic hardship or extended family
obligations, may heighten disconnectedness (Akram & Khan, 2020). Moreover, emotion regulation strategies,
particularly cognitive reappraisal, enhance marital quality even within traditional settings (Bloch et al., 2014).
Recent scholarship identifies new challenges to marital emotional health. Digital media exposure, workfamily
conflict and shifting gender roles increasingly strain relationships (Wang & Zhao, 2023; Lu et al., 2025).
Excessive online engagement diminishes face-to-face communication, fostering emotional distance (Choudary
et al., 2024). Economic pressures and dual-earner responsibilities exacerbate these strains, particularly for
women managing both employment and domestic duties (Rahman et al., 2023).
This study contributes to the literature by examining how emotional orientation and emotional
disconnectedness affect marital bonding in Pakistan. Drawing on survey data from 700 married respondents in
Muzaffarabad, it provides quantitative evidence from a collectivist cultural context where cohesion and
intimacy coexist as marital ideals. Using chi-square, correlation, and regression analyses, the study identifies
emotional orientation as a protective factor and emotional withdrawal as a strong negative predictor. The
results highlight the need for culturally adapted marital counseling that reduces emotional withdrawal while
fostering empathy and responsiveness.
Theoretical Background
Emotional orientation denotes a spouse’s disposition to express empathy, affection, and understanding. It
reflects emotional availability and has been linked with marital satisfaction, trust, and resilience. Couples high
in orientation demonstrate greater intimacy and better conflict resolution (Meier et al., 2024). In Western
samples, orientation predicts long-term stability (Fincham & Beach, 2010). In contrast, emotional
disconnectedness involves withdrawal, avoidance of dialogue, and lack of empathy. It undermines trust,
increases isolation, and erodes marital cohesion. Gottman & Silver (1999) identified withdrawal as one of the
“Four Horsemen” predicting divorce. Longitudinal studies confirm that disengagement steadily reduces marital
quality (Jolin et al., 2022). Observational research similarly finds that avoidance during conflict predicts
dissatisfaction (Rosen et al., 2025). In Pakistan, frequent disagreements, negative communication cycles, and
economic constraints amplify emotional distance, with demandwithdraw patterns intensifying distress
(Caughlin & Huston, 2002). Negative exchanges correlate strongly with lower satisfaction (Lu et al., 2025),
revealing the destructive potential of unresolved conflict.
Although much of this evidence derives from Western samples, cultural parallels appear in South Asia. Here,
family structures and kinship obligations shape marital expectations, but emotional expression remains central
to satisfaction (Shujja & Adil, 2024). Emotional orientation enhances bonding even in traditional marriages,
whereas disconnectedness and role strain reduce harmony (Akram & Khan, 2020; Rahman et al., 2023). This
combination of universal emotional mechanisms and culture-specific stressors warrants deeper investigation.
Marital Intimacy and Contemporary Stressors
Across contexts, recent research reinforces that emotional availability predicts higher marital quality, while
withdrawal undermines intimacy. Lebow & Snyder (2022) emphasizes responsiveness and engagement as core
elements of couple therapy, aligning with evidence that demandwithdraw cycles erode satisfaction over time
(Caughlin & Huston, 2002). In Pakistan and similar societies, culturally embedded stressorsworkfamily
imbalance, financial pressure, and shifting gender expectations interact with these emotional patterns. Dual-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5538
www.rsisinternational.org
career couples often report greater conflict and reduced satisfaction (Rahman et al., 2023; Abdullah et al.,
2023).
The digital era introduces additional risks. “Partner phubbing” (ignoring a partner to engage with a phone) and
excessive social media use have been linked to lower marital satisfaction in Pakistan (Arshad & Imran, 2022).
Broader meta-analyses suggest that moderate, shared online engagement supports relationship quality, whereas
overuse diminishes well-being (Chadha et al., 2025). At the same time, research advances in psychometrics
have enabled more refined analysis of conflict and bonding. The Romantic Partner Conflict Scale (RPCS) has
been translated and validated for Pakistani couples, facilitating local assessment of communication styles
(Farooq et al., 2024). Emotion regulation, particularly adaptive cognitive strategies, has also emerged as a
crucial mechanism linking communication and satisfaction (Ali & Saleem, 2022). Such findings echo cross-
national evidence that emotional regulation buffers the harmful effects of conflict on intimacy.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a cross-sectional quantitative research design to examine the relationships between
emotional orientation, emotional disconnectedness, and marital bonding among married individuals in
Pakistan. A total of 700 respondents participated in the survey. Participation was voluntary, with informed
consent obtained prior to data collection and confidentiality strictly maintained. No financial incentives were
offered, and participants retained the right to withdraw at any stage. Stratified random sampling was used to
ensure balanced representation across gender, age groups, and socio-economic strata. Respondents were
recruited from both urban and semi-urban areas, capturing the cultural and demographic diversity of the
region. All questionnaire items were measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Strongly Disagree
to 5 = Strongly Agree. For each construct, multiple indicators were aggregated by computing their mean
scores, a widely accepted method for generating reliable composite variables in social science research.
The constructs were operationalized as follows:
i. Emotional Orientation (Independent Variable): Measured through items capturing empathy, emotional
support, sharing of feelings, recognition of opinions, and expression of affection.
ii. Emotional Disconnectedness (Independent Variable): Assessed through items reflecting emotional
distance, avoidance of emotional issues, isolation, and withdrawal.
iii. Disagreement (Independent Variable): Measured via indicators of the frequency and intensity of
spousal disagreements.
iv. Emotional Well-being (Control Variable): Evaluated using items assessing emotional stability and
positive regulation strategies.
v. Marital Bonding (Dependent Variable): Captured through items measuring closeness, trust, shared
time, commitment, and emotional security.
Reliability analysis indicated that all measurement scales demonstrated good internal consistency, with
Cronbach’s alpha coefficients exceeding 0.70, the widely accepted threshold for reliability. Structured
questionnaires were administered both in person and online. Ethical approval was obtained prior to data
collection, and informed consent was secured from all participants. Respondents were assured of
confidentiality and informed that participation was voluntary and could be withdrawn at any time.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The analysis involved computation of descriptive statistics,
followed by chi-square tests, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression to test the
proposed hypotheses.
RESULTS
Descriptive analyses indicated variability among respondents in their experiences of emotional orientation,
emotional disconnectedness, and marital bonding. Overall, mean scores suggested moderate levels of
emotional orientation and bonding, accompanied by higher variability in emotional disconnectedness,
indicating differing emotional engagement patterns among couples.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5539
www.rsisinternational.org
Chi-square analyses revealed a significant association between marital bonding and emotional
disconnectedness, χ²(50, N = 700) = 3109.23, p < .001 (Table 1). This finding confirms that bonding and
disconnectedness are not independent constructs, suggesting that variations in emotional withdrawal
correspond closely with differences in bonding quality.
Table 1. Chi-Square Test of Association between Marital Bonding and Emotional Disconnectedness
Test
Value
df
p
Pearson Chi-Square
3109.23
50
< .001
Pearson’s correlation coefficients demonstrated significant relationships among the key variables (Table 2):
i. Emotional orientation ↔ Marital bonding: r = .10, p < .01
ii. Emotional disconnectedness ↔ Marital bonding: r = .20, p < .01
iii. Disagreement ↔ Marital bonding: r = –.88, p < .01
These results indicate that while emotional orientation is positively associated with bonding, both emotional
disconnectedness and disagreement are negatively related, with disagreement showing the strongest inverse
association.
Table 2. Pearson Correlation Matrix of Study Variables
Emotional
Orientation
Emotional
Disconnectedness
Disagreement
Marital Bonding
1
.871**
.094*
.103**
.871**
1
.180**
.197**
.094*
.180**
1
.884**
.103**
.197**
.884**
1
A multiple linear regression was conducted with marital bonding as the dependent variable (Table 3). The
model was statistically significant, F(2, 697) = 21.47, p < .001, explaining 6% of the variance (R² = .06).
Emotional orientation emerged as a positive predictor of bonding (β = .28, p < .001), whereas emotional
disconnectedness was a stronger negative predictor (β = .44, p < .001).
These results suggest that emotional withdrawal exerts a greater detrimental impact on marital bonding than
the positive contribution of emotional orientation, underscoring the critical role of emotional engagement in
sustaining marital relationships.
Table 3. Multiple Regression Predicting Marital Bonding
Predictor
B
SE B
β
t
p
Constant
14.95
.53
28.32
< .001
Emotional Orientation
.48
.13
.28
3.78
< .001
Emotional Disconnectedness
-1.74
.29
.44
-5.92
< .001
DISCUSSION
The findings provide compelling evidence for the central role of emotional processes in shaping marital
bonding. Consistent with previous research, emotional orientation enhanced bonding, whereas emotional
disconnectedness weakened it (Meier et al., 2024; Rosen et al., 2025). Importantly, the negative effect of
disconnectedness outweighed the positive influence of orientation, indicating that withdrawal behaviors are
particularly detrimental. This result aligns with theory by Gottman & Silver (1999), which identifies
withdrawal as a destructive predictor of marital dissolution.
In the Pakistani context, these findings carry significant implications. Although collectivist norms emphasize
family cohesion and social harmony, emotional intimacy remains a vital determinant of marital satisfaction
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5540
www.rsisinternational.org
(Shujja & Adil, 2024). The results confirm that, despite socio-cultural pressures, emotional factors continue to
play a decisive role in maintaining marital stability. The study adds originality by quantifying these effects in
South Asia, where empirical evidence has been limited.
From a practical perspective, the results highlight the need for marital counseling programs to prioritize the
reduction of emotional withdrawal and disconnectedness. Therapeutic frameworks such as Emotionally
Focused Therapy (EFT) (Lebow & Snyder, 2022) could be culturally adapted to foster engagement and
responsiveness. Likewise, workshops on emotional regulation (Bloch et al., 2014) can enhance orientation and
reduce conflict by equipping couples with strategies to manage stress and express emotions constructively. The
findings also resonate strongly with attachment theory, which emphasizes that secure attachment fosters
emotional openness, responsiveness, and mutual support, thereby enhancing resilience in times of stress. In
contrast, insecure attachment tends to produce withdrawal and emotional unavailability, gradually eroding
relationship quality (Simpson & Rholes, 2017). Observational studies further show that small, everyday
gestures—such as turning toward a partner’s emotional bids for attention—accumulate to build trust and
satisfaction, whereas repeatedly ignoring these bids weakens intimacy and stability (Gottman & Schwartz-
Gottman, 2024).
Clinical evidence reinforces these conclusions. Meta-analytic findings demonstrate that Emotionally Focused
Couple Therapy, which helps partners become more accessible and attuned to one another, significantly
reduces distress and improves satisfaction (Rathgeber et al., 2019). Reviews of contemporary couple
interventions likewise stress that therapeutic success often depends on repairing emotional ruptures and
rebuilding responsiveness between partners (Lebow & Snyder, 2022). These patterns highlight that addressing
emotional disengagement is not peripheral but essential to successful relational intervention. Beyond empirical
research, these insights echo philosophical traditions that view emotional connection as central to human
flourishing. Nussbaum (2001) conceptualizes emotions as intelligent judgments about what we value; thus,
neglecting a partner’s emotional needs represents a moral failure to acknowledge the relationship’s
significance. Similarly, Buber’s (1970) distinction between IThou and IIt relationships illustrate how
marriages thrive on mutual presence but deteriorate when partners treat each other as distant or instrumental.
Recognition theory (Honneth, 1995) frames love as an affirmation essential for self-confidence, implying that
emotional neglect constitutes a form of misrecognition. Correspondingly, the ethics of care (Noddings, 2013)
reminds us that attentiveness, empathy, and responsiveness are not optional virtues but moral obligations
within intimate bonds.
Taken together, this body of evidence underscores that emotional needs are central not peripheral to marital
stability. Couples who feel consistently valued, heard, and emotionally supported tend to sustain stronger,
more satisfying relationships. Conversely, when these needs are unmet through withdrawal, neglect, or modern
disruptions such as phubbing, trust and closeness gradually erode. Addressing emotional needs is therefore not
only a psychological necessity but also a moral commitment that underpins enduring, resilient marital
partnerships.
CONCLUSION
This study concludes that emotional disconnectedness is a stronger negative predictor of marital bonding than
the positive influence of emotional orientation. These findings underscore the central role of emotional
dynamics in Pakistani marriages and provide empirical evidence from a collectivist society. The study’s
originality lies in demonstrating that emotional withdrawal is more damaging than orientation is protective, a
nuance often overlooked in Western-centric literature. Policymakers, therapists, and counselors should
therefore prioritize interventions that reduce emotional withdrawal while simultaneously encouraging positive
emotional orientation to strengthen marital ties.
The results reaffirm that emotional processes remain fundamental to marital bonding across cultural
boundaries. Even within collectivist societieswhere loyalty, family duty, and religious values define marital
roles emotional orientation sustain closeness, trust, and resilience. Conversely, disconnectedness, manifested
through avoidance, withdrawal, or neglect, poses a substantial threat to relationship stability. These findings
affirm the universal importance of emotional engagement in marriage while highlighting the need for
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5541
www.rsisinternational.org
culturally grounded counseling practices. By integrating cultural awareness with emotional education,
practitioners can help couples balance social obligations with genuine emotional connection.
Several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the cross-sectional design restricts causal inference. Second,
the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential response and social desirability biases. Third, the
relatively low explanatory power (R² = .06) indicates that additional variables, such as socio-economic stress,
family involvement, and digital media use, may also influence marital bonding.
Future research should therefore employ longitudinal or mixed method designs to capture temporal changes
and deeper insights into emotional dynamics. Expanding the sample to include rural populations and
incorporating qualitative interviews would further enrich understanding by revealing context-specific
meanings of intimacy and withdrawal within collectivist frameworks.
REFERENCES
1. Abdullah, T., Haq, A.U., & Khan, M.I. (2023). Work–family conflict and emotional well‑being among
policewomen in Pakistan. Annals of Social Sciences and Perspective, 4(2), 331-340.
2. Akram, Z., & Khan, S.Y. (2020). Tracing the determinants of marital quality in Pakistani society
through the lens of How It Happened. Global Language Review, 5(2), 115126.
3. Ali, M.A., & Saleem, S. (2022). Family communication and marital satisfaction: A mediating role of
emotion regulation. Rawal Medical Journal, 47(3), 677-680.
4. Arshad, A., & Imran, H. (2022). Partner phubbing, romantic jealousy and marital satisfaction among
married individuals. Applied Psychology Review, 1(2), 1-16.
5. Ayub, N., Iqbal, S., Halford, W.K., & van de Vijver, F. (2023). Couples relationship standards and
satisfaction in Pakistani couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 111-128.
6. Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction:
More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130144.
7. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (R.G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original
work published 1923)
8. Caughlin, J.P., & Huston, T.L. (2002). Demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal
Relationships, 9(1), 95-119.
9. Chadha, L., Sharma, P., Kaur, R., Arya, I., & Sharma, P. (2025). The impact of social media addiction
on self-esteem and life satisfaction among married couples. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary
Care, 14(4), 1494-1501.
10. Farooq, Z., Akhtar, N., & Zacchilli, T. (2024). Validation of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale (RPCS)
in Pakistani married couples: Establishing measurement invariance. Interpersona: An International
Journal on Personal Relationships, 18(1), 79103.
11. Fincham, F.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal
of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 630649.
12. Gottman, J.M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide
from the country’s foremost relationship expert. New York: Three Rivers Press.
13. Gottman, J.M., & Schwartz-Gottman, J. (2022). The love prescription: Seven days to more intimacy,
connection, and joy. New York: Penguin Life.
14. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
15. Jolin, S., Lafontaine, M.-F., Lussier, Y., & Brassard, A. (2022). How relationship satisfaction and
negative communication trajectories change in emerging adults’ dating relationships: a group-based
dual trajectory analysis. Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 482-496.
16. Lebow, J., & Snyder, D.K. (2022). Couple therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging
developments. Family Process, 61(4), 1359-1385.
17. Lu, L., Wilder, S., & Prager, K.J. (2025). Intimacy reduces withdrawal after conflict in cohabiting
couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(6), 1102-1123.
18. Markman, H.J., & Rhoades, G.K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future
directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 169200.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5542
www.rsisinternational.org
19. Meier, T., Otero, M., Su, S.X., Stephens, J.E., Yu, C.W., & Haase, C.M. (2024). Unraveling the
experience of affection across marital and friendship interactions. Affective Science, 6(1), 104-116.
20. Mosley, M.A., Yoshida, N.R., & Turner, F.A. (2025). Communication is key: The mediating effect of
demandwithdraw patterns on partner phubbing and couple satisfaction. Journal of Marital & Family
Therapy, 51(3), e70053.
21. Choudary, S.S., Khan, M.L., & Atta, N. (2024). Emotional distress, communication patterns and
relationship dissatisfaction among married couples. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(3):01-22
22. Ni, N., Ahrari, S., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Zarean, M., & Roslan, S. (2025). A meta-analytic study of
partner phubbing and its antecedents and consequences. Frontier in Psychology, 13(16), 1561159.
23. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Second Edition.
California: University of California Press.
24. Nugrahani, A., Prameswari, Y., & Napitupulu, R.P.A. (2025). Dual-earner dynamics: how emotional
intimacy shields marital satisfaction from role conflict. The Family Journal, 28(7), 1-12.
25. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
26. Rahman, K.U., Islam, M., & Khan, K. (2023). An empirical examination of work-life balance in dual-
career couples in Pakistan: A qualitative approach. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(1), 122133.
27. Rathgeber, M., Bürkner, P.C., Schiller, E.M., & Holling, H. (2019). The efficacy of emotionally
focused couples therapy and behavioral couples therapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marital & Family
Therapy, 45(3), 447-463.
28. Rosen, N. O., Dubé, J. P., Bosisio, M., & Bergeron, S. (2025). Do demand-withdrawal communication
patterns during sexual conflict predict couples’ relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and sexual
distress? An observational and prospective study. Journal of Sex Research, 62(5), 787799.
29. Shujja, S., & Adil, A. (2024). Affectivity and satisfaction in the relationship of Pakistani couples is
mediated by dyadic coping-based gratitude. PsyCh Journal, 13(2), 287-294.
30. Simpson, J.A., & Rholes, W.S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current
Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1924.
31. Wang, X., & Zhao, K. (2023). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital
interaction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1126-1139.