Finally, the results of this study also align with several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
In relation to SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), culturally aligned CSR strengthens community
identity, fosters inclusivity, and ensures that global companies meaningfully contribute to local development.
With SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), the study demonstrates how authentic CSR efforts
influence consumer behavior toward responsible consumption, encouraging companies to adopt ethical and
sustainable production practices. Regarding SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), the findings highlight the
importance of collaboration between global corporations and local communities to design impactful and relevant
CSR initiatives. Lastly, the study indirectly contributes to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) by
showing how culturally sensitive CSR can promote inclusive opportunities such as local employment, livelihood
programs, and skills development. Altogether, the study not only emphasizes the strategic role of CSR in brand
building but also illustrates its potential as a pathway for advancing sustainable development.
AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY
Limuel Dela Cruz is a graduate student pursuing a Master of Arts in Business Administration (MBA) at Bulacan
State University. He is also a faculty member under the Department of Accountancy and Management at the
College of Our Lady of Mercy of Pulilan Foundation, Inc. His academic and research interests include corporate
social responsibility, consumer behavior, financial management, and business ethics. Through his research, he
aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how cultural and financial perspectives influence brand strategies
and consumer perceptions in the Philippine business environment.
REFERENCES
1. Alsayegh, M., Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social
sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9),
3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
2. Araújo, J., Pereira, I. V., & Santos, J. D. (2023). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand
Image and Brand Equity and Its Impact on Consumer Satisfaction. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 118.
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050118
3. Badham, M., Romenti, S., Jin, Y., Choi, S., Valentini, C., Kim, S., & Colleoni, E. (2022). Does culture
matter? Measuring cross-country perceptions of CSR communication campaigns about COVID-
19. Sustainability, 14(2), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020889
4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches(5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
5. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in
Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
6. Khan, I., & Fatma, M. (2023). CSR Influence on Brand Image and Consumer Word of Mouth: Mediating
Role of Brand Trust. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043409.
7. Min, J., Kim, J., & Yang, K. (2023). CSR attributions and the moderating effect of perceived CSR fit
on consumer trust, identification, and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73,
103274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103274
8. Olazo, D. (2023). Measuring the impact of CSR practices on customer satisfaction during pandemic: A
quantitative study in the Philippines. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-
2022-0244
9. Pradhan S, Mishra A, Bashir M, Bose S (2025;), "Role of CSR perceptions in building customer
engagement". Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2024-0167
10. Simon, N. C. (2023). Corporate social responsibility practices: A study of CSR impact on branding and
customer satisfaction [Special issue]. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 7(3),
249–259. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i3sip2
11. Sharma, E. (2019). A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing
nations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 712–
720. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1739