INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5756
www.rsisinternational.org
Information Behavior and Library Resource Use among Generation
Z Undergraduates
Mad Khir Johari Abdullah Sani, Noor Zaidi Sahid
*
, Muhamad Azrin Ismail
Faculty of Information Science, University Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000472
Received: 20 October 2025; Accepted: 26 October 2025; Published: 17 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the information behaviour and use of library resources of Generation Z undergraduate
students at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Negeri Sembilan. In a world where digital technology is
ubiquitous, academic libraries are struggling to remain relevant to Generation Z. The Generation Z students are
using online resources and taking responsibility for their own learning. A questionnaire was administered to
undergraduate students at UiTM Negeri Sembilan on their information needs, information seeking behaviour,
information literacy skills and use of library resources. The results were subjected to quantitative analysis
(Cronbach reliability, descriptive statistics, structural equation modelling). The study found that students had
high information needs (mean, 3.85/4), high information seeking behaviour (mean, 3.64/5) and high information
literacy skills (mean, 3.72/4). The results showed high reliability (Cronbachs α > 0.78 for all constructs). The
results of the structural equation modelling indicated that information literacy skills (β = 0.536, p < 0.001) were
the strongest predictors to library use, with information need = 0.235, p < 0.001) next, while information-
seeking behaviour = 0.117, p = 0.021) was the weakest. The study shows that high information needs does
not lead to high library use. Actively and strategically seeking information behaviour is the predictor to library
use. If library use is to be increased then libraries at UiTM must develop services which are digital, which provide
specific training in information literacy and which supply library resources in formats which are consonant with
student information behaviour patterns. The results of this study will serve as a base to allow libraries and
educators a framework to improve access to and use of academic information via strategies which are user
centred.
Keywords: Information behaviour, Information literacy, Information-seeking behaviour, Library resource use,
Generation Z, Academic librarie, Digital learning.
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Generation Z (Gen Z), the cohort born from the mid-1990s to the early 2010s, is the first generation to grow up
wholly immersed in digital technology. Their learning and information-seeking habits reflect their digital
nativeness, as they tend to place great importance on convenience and immediacy and use interactive multimedia
platforms (Cain et al., 2022; Tjiptono, 2020). In Malaysian higher education, the shift is clear: while students
find they have substantial information needs arising from the academic work they are required to do, a significant
number are not making the full use of the resources of their university libraries to meet these needs (Naveed &
Mahmood, 2021; Malaysiakini, 2023).
Studies have shown that Malaysian students are aware of their academic information requirements but lack high
levels of information literacy skills, which have the effect of restricting the efficient use of the universitys
scholarly databases (Naveed & Mahmood, 2021). By way of example, a study conducted at UiTM has revealed
that only about one-third of respondents use the digital library services provided adequately, while the rest
depend heavily on lecture notes written by themselves (87%) and by others (72%) for their information needs,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5757
www.rsisinternational.org
indicating a vast gap between the information needs of students and the need to consult the formal library
resources available (Ismail, 2024).
Similar findings have come to light here, in South-East Asia, where the high information needs required for study
do not lead automatically to a use of institutional libraries and library-resources because of digital convenience
and usability factors (Htay et al., 2022). The academic libraries of UiTM Negeri Sembilan have considerable
physical and electronic holdings and a large range of services, but the borrowing statistics are only moderate in
comparison to the range of holdings available (Ismail, 2024). One of the factors contributing to this situation is
the way students search for information and the habits they have with respect to information seeking. Use of the
more advanced strategies of searching available to them, such as Boolean logic, is seldom employed. In fact,
only 27% of Malaysian undergraduates have been reported as using the techniques of availing themselves of
such facilities properly. Again, it has been reported that as many as 85% of students overlook aspects of the
credibility of sources in getting information at the time of searching the Internet (Hsu, 2021). Even where greater
accessibility of infrastructure has been gained, students have tendencies to prefer receiving free sources of
information that are accessible very rapidly, such as in the use of Google and social media, to availing themselves
of using libraries (Devi et al., 2024; Jiao et al., 2023).
In the background of these developments, changes at the global level are also noted where undergraduates (of
Gen Z) in all countries of the world prefer to use social media and other electronic forms of media for searching
for information, without the necessity of traditional library use. Thus, there is a clear need for a rethinking of the
academic services we offer in Libraries (Okwu et al., 2025; Cain et al., 2022). The complex interaction between
such needs and information searching behaviour, information literacy and library usage is considerable. Several
studies indicate that a very high information need does not in itself lead to finding library resources, but that the
transition from a need to the taking up resources will depend upon considerations of expediency, awareness and
competence (Soroya et al., 2020; Naveed et al., 2023). It has also been indicated that there is considerable
engagement with Libraries for students who have involved themselves in structured and strategic searching
procedures using subject databases, Boolean operators and filtering techniques (Weber et al., 2018; Zhu et al.,
2021). Those relying more on a simple key-word search, searching mechanisms or Googling, extensive use of
library systems of any description always seems to be for either reason of difficulty and expensiveness or of low
ease of adoption (Htay et al., 2022).
It has been shown positively to relate the degree to which students are information literate, where literacy is
(defined) as the need to be able to locate, to evaluate, and to use information (ie. use of libraries), although
literacy is not sufficient it would appear unless allied to a willingness to seek and use appropriate channels (Akter
Ahmed, 2024; Dolniar & Podgornik, 2023).
This study, therefore, is designed to investigate information searching behaviours in the context of Library
resource used of our own undergraduates of UiTM Negeri Sembilan. The focus of the study concentrates on (1)
the information need, the information searching and the information literacy of the students involved, and (2)
the relationships of such factor worship (of various aspects of the library information resource centre). This will
take place to assist us in establishing what sorts of intervention to make, if at all necessary, to our relationships
with both Librarians and College Tutors. To inform the academic communities of the nature of approaches to be
made in terms Library resource information learning/experience from Library’s, (of an increasingly interesting
nature to Gen Z) expected from their Libraries.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Generation Z
The notion of digital literacy has evolved substantially Generation Z (born between 1997-2012) is regarded as
the first fully digital-native generation, shaped by experiences that relate to ubiquitous access to the internet,
mobile delivery systems, and algorithmically structured information environments. Their preferences for how,
when, and in what mode learning takes place emphasise speed, personalisation, and interactivity, setting them
apart from previous generations (Devi, Ramli, & Malek, 2024). Cain, Loewenstein, and Harbaugh (2022) found
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5758
www.rsisinternational.org
that Gen Z learners favour multimodal resources providing a combination of visual, aural, and interactive
resources, which provides a congruity with the prevalence of platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram, in
entertainment and education. On the other hand, exposure to these digital environments has changed their
perspectives on authority and quality of information.
Okwu, Adeniran and Ibrahim (2025) found that Nigerian undergraduate learners appreciated information from
libraries but questioned the relevance of library provided information services and what convenience they offered
compared to speed and familiarity of the internet. Yee and Tan (2024) also found the case in Malaysian Gen Z
learners in which the immediacy of searches was at times valued as being equivalent to credible information,
indicating a modus operandi conditioned by their digital upbringing in which usability cuts across reliability or
credibility of the information. At the same time, Gen Z learning egregiously shows self-directed tendencies and
prefers control over the pace, sequence, and tools of their learning (Subaveerapandiyan, Lee, & Lim, 2023).
This coincides with research findings on student autonomy—Devi et al. (2024) assert that Gen Z students want
educational arenas to provide for formal learning with mobile apps, social media, and cloud technologies. Higher
educational institutions and particularly libraries have the challenges of aligning with generations who want the
sources and structure of traditional academic standards combined with flexibility of digital provision and social
recognition.
Information Behaviour and Library Resources Use
Information behavior frameworks (Wilson, 1999) demonstrate that resource utilization is dictated not only by
recognized information needs, but also by seeking strategies and mediating factors such as the following: literacy,
resources and institutional support. Recent evidence shows that Gen Z’s information behavior is likely to deviate
significantly from previously accepted models of information behavior due to the inherently digital based
preferences of this demographic group. In many contexts, the high academic information needs of students
appear not to translate into library usage by them. Htay, Ling and Tan (2022), for instance, noted that 92% of
Southeast Asian students resorted to the default function of Google for searching information, while nearly 88%
made recourse to social media information in respect of academic queries, even although they had access to
institutional databases.
The use of these resources is superseded by convenience and habit. In similar vein, it was found by Nieminen,
Savolainen and Gu (2020) that Malaysian dental students relied heavily not on library provided databases, but
on peer feedback and lecture notes, despite a recognition of the value of credible information. Emerging studies
seem to confirm that library usage depends less on the existence of resources, but rather more on default behavior
types of students themselves, as well as on perceptions regarding usefulness. Zaki, Anuar and Dollah (2023)
found that UiTM students in fact valued library services qualitatively but did not engage with them ever, because
of perceived difficulties with usability of digital platforms.
Yusof, Halim and Rahman (2023), further studied the behaviors of specific students and found that students
demonstrating a strong adoption of seeking behaviors (to include behaving behaviourally differently towards
usage of multiple databases, consulting librarians) had strong academic performance results and rated the
benefits of seeking behaviors in relation to effective library usage. The literature examined above however, does
underline the mediating factors of behavior and perception; libraries may have vast resources but unless students
behaviors are congruent with library systems and unless they have the competencies of literacy, library usage is
very low. This is especially true as far as Gen Z is concerned. The defaults of their behaviors are founded in
ecosystems incentivizing immediacy, personalization and user control.
Gen Z and Information Behaviour and Library Resources Use
In addressing Generation Z undergraduates, the combined incidence of high need, digital preference, and
information literacy gaps presents a paradox. Students have high academic needs for information, yet they tend
to bypass library systems for quicker options favoured by their peers. Devi et al. (2024) reported that Generation
Z students from South-East Asia routinely incorporate YouTube and Twitter in their studies and routines, placing
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5759
www.rsisinternational.org
them in the category of primary sources for explanation and peer experience. Okwu et al. (2025) reported similar
findings, in that Nigerian undergraduates shunned the library for e-learning platforms and social media as the
backbone to their information-literacy based needs. Regarding undergraduates in Malaysia, the UiTM situation
presents a similar pattern. Utilizing findings from UiTM Negeri Sembilan, the students had high needs for
information and moderate information literacy yet retained a tendency toward sources from the open web rather
than from institutional databases.
This is congruent with the findings of Tan and Salleh (2023) that the Malaysian students overestimated their IL
capabilities by equating searching skills with the Google environment as equivalent to advanced levels of
literacy. Therefore, even students who consider themselves capable find that they struggle with more closely
defined database search queries or exercises for critical appraisal, diluting the associations between need and use
of libraries. However, there has been some recent research that does outline the beneficial nature of interventions.
Akter and Ahmed (2024) have shown that the students in Bangladesh have reported massive improvements in
their information literacy scores—from an average of 28.4% correctness pre-training exposure to greatly
improved scores post-training—when exposure to structured information-literacy instruction is received. Similar
results have appeared elsewhere, in ASEAN situations, in which information literacy training has been integrated
into the curricula by libraries (Subaveerapandiyan et al., 2023).
These seem to indicate that the barriers which Generation Z students appear to face are not immutable uploaded
facets of the personality structure associated with the Generation, but rather deficits in skills that can be altered
by means of advice imparted in interventions which are targeted. In summary, regarding the behaviors of
Generation Z toward information, there appears to be a structural mismatch, in that high needs are present, but
the mode of behaviors and skills are a product of digital-first modes which are often negating regarding libraries.
Academic libraries, which would include those operated by UiTM, need therefore to re-position themselves as
dynamic, user-centered partners not only in supplying information, but also in the physical and digital
experiences offered which Generation Z expect as partners.
This repositioning requires that more information services be dealt through the platforms which students already
meet, and through easy access systems such as mobile designed systems, and AI usage, and by incorporating
instruction in literacy directly into curricular units. By tackling this behavioral and systemic gap, it would be
possible to transform the high levels of information need which Generation Z students possess toward a more
stable, more active level of satisfaction, and once achieved this high information need would become engendered
as a way of use of libraries.
Research Framework and Hypothesis Development
By integrating the foregoing perspectives, we see that a research design may be conceptualized in which
information need, information seeking behavior, and information literacy skills operate as independent variables
that have possible effects on the dependent variable library information resource use. This fits within Wilson's
macro model (need, seeking, use) but also isolates IL skills as being a component which may enhance or impede
effective seeking and use. Thus, there is some implicit consideration given to the TAM concept: the degree to
which seeking, and IL skills translate into a library use variable may depend upon student perceptions of the
library's usefulness, facility of use, etc. (but these perceptions are not computed here being noted in interpreting
results). From our review of the literature, we have come up with the following extrapolated hypotheses: H1:
There is a significant relationship between undergraduate students' information need and their use of library
information resources. The students who perceive themselves to have a higher level of academic related
information need (for instance, those students who frequently have need for information for assignments,
research, or personal knowledge deficiencies) will be expected to use library resources to a higher degree. This
hypothesis relates to the thought that need is a motivational force in the impulse to seek information.
There is research supporting this hypothesis H1. Akter and Ahmed (2024) noted that as undergraduates became
more aware of their academic information needs (especially after their awareness of scholarly information needs
was accentuated by IL training) that their use of both internet and library source material witnessed a dramatic
increase. Htay et al. (2022) also noted that students with specific urgent information needs (in the case of their
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5760
www.rsisinternational.org
study, information needs related to health) were more vigorous in their utilization of established databases and
institutional digital resources to satisfy those needs. From these findings we learn that the extent of the need and
specificity of the information required serve as a powerful predictor of the need to utilize formal library means.
We may predict in our case that students with a strong feeling of the need for substantive information (e.g., for
the completion of a thesis or major project) will evidence a much higher incidence of library use over those with
only minimal or routine-type information needs.
H2: A significant relationship exists between undergraduate studentsinformation-seeking behavior and their use
of library information resources. We define “information seeking behavioras how proactive and methodical
students are in searching for information (including variables that capture how often students search for
information, different sources used in the search, and search strategies). In other words, we expect that
undergraduate students who demonstrate more active and complex information-seeking methods are more likely
to report frequent use of library resources. Weber et al. (2018) found that students who used a more complex
search strategy (for instance, checking multiple scholarly databases, refining their search, etc.) not only had an
advantage in performance to their peers, but they were also much more likely to be regular users of the library.
Zhu et al. (2021) similarly reported that employing more advanced information-seeking strategies (e.g.,
intentional attempt to formulate a query or evaluate search results critically) were associated with a greater
reliance on academic libraries. Collectively, the evidence suggests that the way undergraduate students seek
information (their behavior) plays a major role in where they find information. For example, undergraduates that
are accustomed to typing a question into Google may not routinely access the library’s databases. Conversely, a
student who uses this typical form of information seeking yet knows how to find the subject index, uses Boolean
searching, and/or searches the library catalogue is likely much more willing (and able) to use library resources.
In fact, Htay et al. (2022) found that studentsinformation-seeking behavior during the pandemic (for example,
if the student took the time to verify information, or if they pursued their query in a systematic way) was directly
related to their satisfaction of use of academic information sources, suggesting that deliberate seekers are more
likely to use academic sources and value them more than their peers.
We expect to find that undergraduate students who report more frequent and in-depth information seeking (e.g.,
consulting multiple sources, using library search engines or databases, asking a librarian for help) will report
using library information resources more often. H2 is also consistent with the most recent version of the Health
Information Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): we would expect that active seekers of information will also
likely perceive library resources to be useful in meeting their search needs and would thus incorporate them into
their search process.
H3: There is a significant relationship between undergraduate students information literacy skills and their
library information resource use. We put forward therefore a hypothesis in general terms that students who are
proficient in IL – and the extent of their capacity to find, evaluate, and use information will on the other hand
make greater use of the library and of better use of it than do those students. The rationale here is that a student
with good IL competences will then be in a position freely to make the proper evaluations of library resources
of the databases; to be able to tell the difference between a scholarly document or not, and so on. This student
then will presumably be able to profit in greater degree from what the library can provide for them.
There are several studies examining opinions that give support to these findings. For example, Akter and Ahmed
(2024) have reported from an experimental study that students who received structured IL teaching were then
subsequently twice as likely to use academic databases, then those who had no such instruction, and that they
felt at least more confident in orienting themselves in the system of libraries. A recent study by
Subaveerapandiyan et al. (2023) in respect of students in the ASEAN region has examined the point that limited
information resources and digital literacy were important barriers to subscribing for information to the digital
tools which libraries had available, because this means that the students were missing IL skills which would
presumably restrict the extent of use of the library resources (and conversely that if the IL skills were high the
resource use would be probably of an extended use).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5761
www.rsisinternational.org
Dolničar and Boh Podgornik (2023) have investigated Slovenian students and found that those students who had
undergone targeted IL instructions were very much more competent in availing themselves of library eresources,
evaluating and exploiting them as compared with the previous position and rapidly taught possible use of these
in their academic work, than they were before their testing. These findings would suggest to us that IL skills have
a rather positive tendency on the extent of their use by students of the academic library sources. It will be,
however, be available to note that some of these findings are somewhat ambiguous. YevelsonShorsher and
Bronstein (2018) in reporting that students who had no IL awareness were, in general, ignorant of the existence
of the relevant library resources upon which they failed to rely for their information did find that students who
were highly self-rated in the IL ability might not be using the libraries in the event of the other sources offering
them more congenial suggestions.
These reasons give lead for us to produce H3 as a general hypothesis of a positive tendency, but we must not be
surprised to find that no extensive library use can be shown to be a function of the high IL ability: possible virtues
of habit or convenience (per TAM), course requirements, and so on might come into it. Naveed et al. (2023)
concluded that the better use of information skills by medical students tended to be associated with increased
and more imaginative use of the informational resources available to them, among which were a few
requirements as of library resources, especially in a continuing life-long but independent of immediate course
experience. It was suggested that in the course of the time, the students with IL skills made better not only of
library sources but obtained more useful and various resources of use from libraries generally (for example, work
through databases as by of self-knowledge applications). It is intended therefore that H3 should be an experiment
to investigate whether, in this instance, higher standards of IL will be shown among us to be a correlational
function of greater library resource use and various types.
In conclusion, the conceptual framework as illustrated in figure 1 proposes information need (H1), information
seeking behaviour (H2), and information literacy skills (H3) as positive influences on Gen Z undergraduate
studentsusage of library information resources. These propositions combine findings from Wilson’s model of
information behaviour (with the concepts of need and seeking precluding use) with the ACRL/IL perspective
(with the concept that skills allow for use) and TAM (which indicates that the underlying concept is that so long
as the tools available for studentsuse are perceived as useful for their needs and students possess the skills for
their easy use then the more engaged students will be, with library tools). The survey and analysis of the study
are designed to test these propositions and provide empirical evidence on how these variables function in a Gen
Z university context.
Fig. 1: The Conceptual Framework of Theory for Library Information Resource Use
METHODOLOGY
A cross-sectional survey design was employed to examine relationships between studentsinformation behaviour
and library use.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5762
www.rsisinternational.org
Population and Sampling
The relevant population was undergraduates at UiTM Negeri Sembilan. Through a purposive sampling
procedure, students from across the various faculties were obtained to reach as wide a range of students as
possible. The target sample was about 374 respondents based on sampling size calculations and previous
research. The questionnaire was administered via the internet through university channels of communication and
social media and academic groups with the help of lecturer networks to encourage further participation.
Instrument
The data were obtained through a standard questionnaire. The survey measured the following four constructs:
the need for information, the information seeking behaviour, the information literacy skills, and the use of library
information resources. The items were adapted from scales previously validated in research (Soroya et al., 2020;
Weber et al., 2018) and in literature dealing with information behaviour. The responses were recorded on a Likert
type of scale. The questionnaire was checked for face and content validity prior to administration by experts in
the field and was pilot tested on a small group of students. A reliability test (using Cronbach’s Alpha) was made
on the pilot data to establish a value greater than that of 0.70.
Data Collection
The Conceptual Framework of the Theory of Library / Information Resource Use (Source: Based on literature
reviewed). The final questionnaire was distributed via the Internet in the early part of the year 2020. Participation
in the study was voluntary and anonymity guaranteed. Consent was obtained in an informed way via the Internet,
and the respondents were forced to give consent before being able to complete the questionnaire. Over 400
undergraduates returned the completed questionnaire and the usable cleaned data for analysis was taken from
approximately 374 of those respondents (and it was larger than the minimum of 374). The undergraduates
responding were largely biased to younger respondents (mainly under 28 years and under).
Analysis Both the descriptive and inferential statistics were used for the data again. The reliability or not of the
constructs was determined by calculating Cronbach's Alpha and composite reliabilities. Means and standard
deviations were calculated to indicate the levels of need, the seeking, the literacy and the use. Structural Equation
Modelling (SEM) was used with Partial-Least Squares (PLS-SEM) for testing the hypothesized relationships.
The model produced the paths from Information Need, Information Seeking, Information Literacy to Library
Resource Use. The PLS-SEM enabled us to check the validity of the constructs (convergent and discriminant)
and the paths (β), the t-values and p-values of the constructs. The statistics were all done using SPSS (for the
descriptives) and SmartPLS (for the SEM procedures). The standard ethical procedures were used for the study:
voluntary participation, anonymised answers as for all respondents, and ethical approval was obtained from the
university’s research ethics committee.
RESULTS
Descriptive Statistics and Reliability
Among the 374 undergraduate responses, the majority (68.42% n = 256) were female students and male students
comprised 31.58% (n = 118). The significant gender imbalance with over two-thirds female may reflect generally
in the enrollment of the academic programmes being sampled or a greater survey response rate of female
students. These gender proportions are important for the patterns of information behaviour, as previous studies
have indicated a possible effect of gender on preference for resource use and information-seeking behaviour as
indicated in Table 1.
TABLE 1 GENDER
Category
n
%
Male
118
31.55
Female
256
68.45
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5763
www.rsisinternational.org
As shown in Table 2, most of the 374 generations Z undergraduates who replied (18-28) were in diploma-level
programmes especially those which were applied, scientific and technical. The most popular was the Diploma
in Microbiology which catered for 29.41% of the students thus showing there was great interest in the life
sciences. Next was the Diploma in Halal Management with 16.04%, this shows that Gen Z is interested in cultural
and regulatory issues. The Bachelor of Information Science (Hons) Library Management diploma and the
Diploma in Sports and Recreation Management accounted for 8.02% which would illustrate that there is a
balance of academic subjects to recreational ones. The Diploma in Textile and Clothing Technology catered for
7.49% of the students which would bear out the creative and practical approach to learning favored by Gen Z.
Smaller proportions of students were enrolled for the Diploma in Recreation and Parks Management (6.68%),
Bachelor of Science Mathematics (5.35%) and Bachelor of Information Science (Hons) Records Management
(4.81%). The least popular was the Bachelor in Administrative Science (Hons) which had only 1.34% of the
students responding to it.
Table 2: Programme Of Study
Program
Percent
Bachelor’s in administrative science (Hons)
1.34
Bachelor of Information Science (Hons) Library Management
8.02
Bachelor of Information Science (Hons) Records Management
4.81
Bachelor of Science Mathematics
5.35
Diploma in Halal Management
16.04
Diploma in Microbiology
29.41
Diploma in Recreation and Parks Management
6.68
Diploma in Sports and Recreation Management
8.02
Diploma in Textile and Clothing Technology
7.49
It can be seen in Table 3 that all 374 respondents of this study were of the Generation Z age group which covers
those in the age group of 17 to 28 years. This is consistent with those age groups of diploma and undergraduate
students in Malaysian public universities. Most of the respondents (64.17%, n = 240) are aged below 20 years
which would likely constitute students of first year or second year diplomas in the age groups of 17 to 19 years.
These younger Gen Zs have usually been brought up to have more early exposure in digital environments, and
tend to favour mobile-first applications, readable user interfaces and instant access to sources of academic
references for future use. A big proportion (32.09%, n = 120) fall into the age range of 21 to 24 years, which will
correspond generally with the advanced diploma students or students of bachelor’s degree level. This group of
students will generally have more independence in learning and a better knack for navigating databases or being
able to evaluate the merits or verity of sources of information. A far smaller group (3.74%, n = 14) consist of
students aged between 25 and 28 years, which cohort may comprise those studying non normal degree
programmes, returning to study or late starters. Although the latter group also forms part of the Gen Zs, they may
show some slight changes in manner of knowledge seeking because of the different experiences and
responsibilities in life which they have experienced. Overall, the demographics as presented demonstrates that
the study also takes into consideration the kind of academic habits and preferences which the digital native Gen
Z group show (Putri et al., 2021; Alzahrani & Seth, 2023).
Table 3: Age
Age Group
n
%
< 20 years
240
64.17
21–24 years
120
32.09
25–28 years
14
3.74
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5764
www.rsisinternational.org
Instrument Reliability Analysis
Internal consistency among each of the constructs in the present study pertaining to Generation Z undergraduate
students was measured by Cronbach's Alpha coefficients (see Table 4). All constructs measured had coefficients
above the commonly accepted criterion of 0.70 (Hair Jr et al., 2014) with a range of 0.856 for Information
Literacy to 0.926 for Information Use. This demonstrates that the survey items have a high internal reliability in
measuring the information behaviors of the members of Generation Z students. Convergent validity was
measured using standardized factor loadings, Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted
(AVE). All the factor loadings were above 0.70, and the respective AVE of the constructs exceeded the minimum
criterion of 0.50, ranging from 0.540 to 0.673. The CR ranged from 0.854 to 0.911, pointing to the high internal
consistency and high level of convergence of the various indicators (Hair Jr et al., 2014).
Table 4 Reliability and Convergent Validity
Construct
Items
Cronbach's Alpha
Factor loadings
Composite Reliability (CR)
AVE
Information Literacy (IL)
IL1
IL2
IL3
IL4
IL5
.856
0.83
0.79
0.84
0.85
0.81
0.911
0.673
Information Need (IN)
IN1
IN2
IN3
IN4
IN5
.903
0.76
0.81
0.78
0.82
0.83
0.873
0.58
Information Seeking (IS)
IS1
IS2
IS3
IS4
IS5
.892
0.72
0.74
0.76
0.77
0.75
0.854
0.54
Information Use (IU)
IU1
IU2
IU3
IU4
IU5
.926
0.80
0.83
0.79
0.84
0.82
0.89
0.62
The findings indicate that these items measure the theoretical constructs tested validly, i.e. information literacy,
need, seeking and use, amongst members of digitally oriented Generation Z learners. Discriminant validity was
measured using both the Fornell-Larcker test and the Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio tests which indicated
that the constructs were empirically distinct from each other. Discriminant validity is said to exist when the
square root of the AVE of the specific construct exceeded the correlation of this construct with the other
constructs (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). This was established to be true for all constructs as can be seen in Table
5. In addition, the HTMT values were all below the conservative critical value of 0.85 alluded to in the literature
as shown in Table 6, indicating that the constructs do not overlap excessively and are conceptually distinct from
each other (Henseler et al., 2015). From these validation results, it can be inferred that the measurement model
is both reliable and valid when examining the information behavior and library resource use among Generation
Z undergraduates—whose members typify the class of digital usage, independence and dependence on rapid
access to relevant information.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5765
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 5 Discriminant Validity (Fornell & Larcker)
Construct
IL
IN
IS
IU
Information Literacy (IL)
0.820
Information Need (IN)
0.658
0.761
Information Seeking (IS)
0.602
0.641
0.735
Information Use (IU)
0.669
0.684
0.698
0.787
Table 6 Discriminant Validity (Htmt)
Construct
IL
IN
IS
IU
Information Literacy (IL)
Information Need (IN)
0.790
Information Seeking (IS)
0.796
0.840
Information Use (IU)
0.760
0.794
0.849
Assessment of Structural Model
This study employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), using Smart PLS 4.0 for
estimating the relationships between the variables of information behavior for Generation Z undergraduates. This
method allows examination both predictive capability and of hypothesis testing within the research model that
was constructed.
As shown in the path coefficient diagram in Figure 2, and Table 7, the model consists of three major independent
variables: Information Need (IN), Information Seeking (IS), and Information Literacy (IL), which all influenced
the dependent variable, Information Use (IU). The coefficient of determination (R²) for Information Use was
.611, which suggests that 61.1% of the variance in use of library information resources by students can be
explained by the three independent variables. Therefore, there is considerable support for both predictive
capability in this model and for the soundness of this model in Generation Z students (ages 17-28), who display
characteristics of digital native beginning students with independent learning styles (Putri et al., 2021; Alzahrani
& Seth, 2023).
Hypothesis Testing Summary:
As shown in Table 7, the structural model path analysis tested three hypotheses to better understand how
information behavior among Generation Z undergraduate students influenced their use of library resources.
Results of the analysis, using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), revealed that all
three hypotheses were statistically significant and supported. In Hypothesis 1 (H1), the relationship between
Information Need and Information Use revealed a moderate positive path coefficient (β=0.235) with a t-value of
2.313 and a highly significant p-value of 0.000, thus giving strong support for the hypothesis. This indicates that
Generation Z students, in cases where they express an acute consciousness of the need for academic information,
are more inclined to effective use of library resources.
The second hypothesis (H2), relating to the interaction of Information Seeking and Information Use, produces a
statistically significant result (β=0.117, t=10.763, p=0.021), but of considerably smaller size. This would indicate
that the proactive nature of these behaviors adopted by Gen Z students in the locating of information has a
positive correlation with library use but is a behavioral aspect of relatively minor significance in comparison
with the other variables. The greatest correlation is obtained with Hypothesis 3 (H3), where the information
literacy variable (information literacy) has a significant correlation on Information Use (β=0.536, t=4.165,
p=0.000). This denotes that the important variables pertaining to the abilities of the students in the evaluation,
accessibility and ethical use of information has a high correlation with the library resource use of students.
These results pointe to the multifaceted nature of the Gen Z learners, whose exposure to information is
determined by both the wants, and habits, patterns of behavior and skills gained through constant electronic
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5766
www.rsisinternational.org
exposure. The leaders of libraries and academically that wish to engender improved student use of resources
should therefore endeavour to specifically devote themselves to information literacy training and routines which
lead to intuitive handling of information seeking which is efficient and accessible. Thus, we may require that
academic support systems commence to become, in an iota of sense notwithstanding, commensurate and in phase
with the evolving of wants and aspirations of each cohort of college students, with the result of evolving into
deeper, more intensive and more independent efforts at academic inquiry.
Fig 2: Information Behavior and Library Resource Use Model Among Generation Z Undergraduates
Table 7: Structural Model Path Analysis for Information Use of Library
Hypothesis
Relationship
Path
Coefficient (β)
Standard
Deviation (St.d)
t-value
pvalue
Hypothesis
Result
H1
Information Need →
0.235
0.056
2.313
0.000
Supported
Information Use
H2
Information Seeking
Information Use
0.117
0.050
10.763
0.021
Supported
H3
Information Literacy
Information Use
0.536
0.050
4.165
0.000
Supported
DISCUSSION
The results shed more light on the facets of information behaviour of Generation Z students at UiTM Negeri
Sembilan and the implications for academic library systems. The strongest predictor of library use (β = 0.536, p
< 0.001) was found to be information-literacy (IL) skills. Those students who can find, evaluate and use
information, are much more likely to engage with library databases and electronic resources. This supports
previous evidence that IL training allows for an enhancement of the ability to use academic databases (Akter &
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5767
www.rsisinternational.org
Ahmed, 2024). Interestingly, in spite of indicating relatively high IL skills (mean 3.72) many respondents
relied on open-web sources. This suggests that skill is not in itself sufficient for application. It is therefore
recommended that libraries move away from isolated IL workshops, to continuous course-embedded IL delivery,
to ensure that students can use such skills effectively within their disciplines.
Secondly, information need exerted a positive yet moderate effect on library use = 0.235, p < 0.001). Although
recognising a need for academic information can prompt engagement, it does not automatically result in library
use. Students may be conscious of their need but still opt for non-library sources due to convenience or lack of
awareness. This outcome supports earlier findings (Htay et al., 2022; Nieminen et al., 2020) that high levels of
information need do not necessarily translate into library use without adequate exposure to, or motivation for,
library systems.
Thirdly, information-seeking behaviour was shown to have the least strong yet significant statistically
relationship with library use = 0.117, p = 0.021). While active searching is an indicator of engagement, its
contribution is less important than that of literacy and need. A small number of students were shown to employ
advanced strategies using Boolean logic and discipline specific databases (Weber et al., 2018), many defaulting
to simple searching on the web. This suggests that there is a need to create habits of guided searching through
digital literacy programs and to encourage intuitive search tools in the first instance through the library interface.
In general the results suggest that effective library use depends on the accomplishment of two interrelated states
of being: a felt information need, active information-seeking behaviour and the literacy skills needed to locate
and evaluate credible sources. Lack of one of these factors mitigates against overall engagement. The synergy
produced here corresponds closely with Wilson's (1999) model of information behaviour, which integrates
theories about information seeking behaviour within a major information model, the Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM). The latter suggests that the perceived ease of use and usefulness of systems are determinants of
acceptance of the system.
In comparative context the UiTM findings reflect trends internationally. Generation Z undergraduates in
countries such as Nigeria show the same low levels of library use and strong preference for information sourced
from digital or through social media (Okwu et al, 2025). Education studies in Malaysia find that these students
similarly expect libraries to change to become more digital, interactive and user-friendly. Because of this UiTM
libraries will need to address accessibility issues, customer-centric design of digital environments, and create
more positive perceptions of usefulness of these systems, to capture and retain Generation Z engagement.
CONCLUSION
This study provides empirical insights into the information behaviour of Generation Z undergraduates at
University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Negeri Sembilan, providing insights at the crux of studentspreference for
digital means of information provision and non-use of academic libraries. Despite high levels of information
need and moderate search competency being reported, students overall use of libraries is limited. Structural
equation modelling indicates the dimension to exert the greatest influence over library use is information literacy
(IL) skills = 0.536) with information need = 0.235) and information seeking behaviour = 0.117). The
implications of these findings is that it is the ability to identify, evaluate and apply information rather than the
ability to identify an information need that leads to effective use of library resources. However, even those
students who show prowess in their IL skills prefer to use open-web and social media sources because of their
immediacy and ease of access, and this indicates a wider generational change in learning behaviour. For UiTM
Libraries to remain viable, the libraries need to change not to passive repositories of information but to activity
based, user centred learning partners, integrating training in information literacy into academic curricula and
tailoring services to match studentsdigital behaviours. The advance of IL knowledge will help keep academic
libraries in the forefront of academic information provision, and bear out Wilson’s model of information
behaviour, which reinforces the model of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) whereby the perceived
usefulness and the ease of access to the library systems will impact greatly on their adoption. In practical terms,
this study provides a framework for Librarians and Educators to address the issue of earnest integration of IL
knowledge, reviewing and redesigning their digital interfaces, and the fostering of studentsregular information
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5768
www.rsisinternational.org
use behaviour. It would be advisable that further research build on this work, exploring also the longitudinal
effect of IL knowledge building, mobile app integration, with cross-University comparisons instituted to explore
whether increased access to academic resources has any positive effect on measurable increased use.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Building on these findings, it is evident that UiTM libraries must adopt targeted strategies to bridge the gap
between students' information needs and their actual use of library resources. The following recommendations
are proposed to enhance information-literacy competence, improve system accessibility, and foster a culture of
active engagement among Generation Z learners. Each strategy aligns with the study's empirical outcomes and
provides a practical pathway for academic libraries to remain relevant and responsive in an increasingly digital
learning environment.
Revitalise Information-Literacy (IL) Programmes
IL instruction should be repositioned as an integral part of academic coursework rather than a separate skill
building exercise. Workshops, tutorials, and course-embedded tasks can guide students to apply IL competencies
in real learning contexts-such as locating scholarly sources for assignments or evaluating information quality in
research projects. Collaboration between librarians and faculty is crucial to ensure continuous reinforcement of
these skills throughout students' academic progression.
Modernise Library Technology and Access
Library systems must reflect Generation Z's expectations for seamless and mobile-first experiences. Portals
should feature intuitive interfaces, personalised dashboards, and AI-enabled virtual assistance. Continuous WiFi
coverage, simplified authentication, and single-sign-on access will minimise barriers and promote consistent
use. Interface design should prioritise ease of use and perceived usefulness in accordance with the Technology
Acceptance Model (TAM).
Strengthen Social-Media Engagement
Libraries should actively connect with students through the platforms they use most. Regular and purposeful
social-media updates-highlighting new collections, research tips, or student achievements-can increase visibility
and relevance. Short videos, infographics, and interactive posts can draw attention to digital resources while
positioning the library as an accessible and dynamic part of the academic community.
Align Resources with Curriculum Requirements
Continuous consultation with lecturers and students is needed to ensure that library holdings match evolving
teaching and research priorities. Periodic needs assessments and user analytics can guide evidence-based
acquisition decisions. Aligning digital collections with course syllabi strengthens the perception of the library as
essential to learning outcomes.
Develop Collaborative and Experiential Learning Spaces
Reimagine library environments as hybrid learning ecosystems that combine physical and digital interaction.
Flexible study pods, multimedia zones, and virtual collaboration platforms can foster teamwork and creativity.
Integrating gamified tutorials or e-talks on database searching can further stimulate engagement and enhance
students' sense of connection with the library.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Information Management, University Teknologi MARA, that
supported them. The participating university and all students who participated in this study are also greatly
appreciated.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5769
www.rsisinternational.org
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit
sectors
AuthorsContribution
The key investigation through methodology, data collection, formal analysis, and draft preparation was done by
Muhamad Azrin Ismail. The conceptual guidance, supervision and validation was done by Mad Khir Johari
Abdullah Sani and Noor Zaidi Sahid who also helped in the review and editing of the manuscript to be published.
All authors were present throughout the final reading and gave consent to the manuscript.
Conflict Of Interest Declaration
We certify that the article is the Authors and Co-Authors original work. The article has not received prior
publication and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. This research/manuscript has not been
submitted for publication nor has it been published in whole or in part elsewhere. We testify to the fact that all
Authors have contributed significantly to the work, validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation for
submission to Journal Intelek.
REFERENCES
1. Akter, T., & Ahmed, S. Z. (2024). University studentsinformation literacy skills and impact of training
in Bangladesh. IFLA Journal, 50(3), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352241266181
2. Al-Nuaimi, H., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Technology acceptance model: Applications and extensions in
education and e-learning research. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1315–1334.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-0
3. Banik, B., & Kumar, P. (2020). Information literacy skills and academic achievement of university
students: An empirical analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–18.
4. Bartlett, J. C., Frissen, I., & Beheshti, J. (2020). Comparing academic and everyday-life information-
5. seeking behaviour among millennial students. CHIIR 2020 Proceedings, 402–
406. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378006
6. Borrego, Á., & Anglada, L. (2016). Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment:
Attitudes towards searching, publishing and libraries. New Library World, 117(3-4), 173–185.
https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089
7. Bothma, T. J. D., & Fourie, I. (2024). Contextualised dictionary literacy, information literacy and
information behaviour in the e-environment. Library Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-08-
20230082
8. Cain, J., Loewenstein, G., & Harbaugh, W. (2022). Digital engagement and cognitive patterns among
9. Generation Z learners. Computers & Education, 190, 104156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104156
10. Chen, X., Sin, S. C. J., & Theng, Y. L. (2022). Why we share fake news: Understanding the role of
information literacy and social factors among college students. Library & Information Science Research,
44(4), 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101143
11. Dalal, H. A., Taylor, A., & Whitfield, S. (2025). Assessing studentsinformation literacy: Attitudes and
perceptions of college students across generations. College & Research Libraries, 86(3), 255–269.
12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (2024). User acceptance of computer technology revisited:
Thirty-five years of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 61(1), 103724.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103724
13. Devi, S., Ramli, R., & Malek, Z. (2024). Mobile learning and self-directed behaviour among Southeast
Asian Gen Z students. Journal of Digital Learning Research, 8(1), 45–59.
14. Dikeç, G., Yildiz, S., & Korkmaz, S. (2023). Perceptions of Generation Z university students on future
and technology adaptation. International Journal of Education and Development, 43(2), 115–132.
15. Dolničar, D., & Podgornik, B. B. (2023). Factors influencing information literacy of university students.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5770
www.rsisinternational.org
16. In Higher Education: Reflections from the Field (Vol. 2).Intech Open.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100364
17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables
and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
18. Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2012). What’s skill got to do with it? Information literacy skills and self-views
of ability among first-year college students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 63(3), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21681
19. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares
Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
20. Han, L., & Cmor, D. (2016). Does library instruction impact student success? A case study of university
undergraduates. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(3), 54–67.
21. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How college students seek information in the digital age. Project
Information Literacy Report. https://projectinfolit.org
22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–
135.
23. Htay, M. N. N., Parial, L. L., Tolabing, M. C., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., Leung, A. Y. M., & Su, T. T.
(2022). Digital health literacy, online information-seeking behaviour, and satisfaction of COVID-19
information among the university students of East and South-East Asia. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0266276.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266276
24. Ibenne, S. K., Simeonova, B., Harrison, J., & Hepworth, M. (2017). An integrated model highlighting
information literacy and knowledge formation in information behaviour. Aslib Journal of Information
Management, 69(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2016-0148
25. Masrek, M. N., & Gaskin, J. E. (2016). Assessing userssatisfaction with web digital library: The case
of University Teknologi MARA. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(1),
36–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2015-0019
26. Naveed, M. A., & Mahmood, M. (2021). Correlatives of business students perceived information literacy
self-efficacy in the digital information environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,
54(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211014277
27. Naveed, M. A., Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Shaukat, R., & Kishwer, R. (2023). How information literacy
influences creative skills among medical students? The mediating role of lifelong learning. Medical
Education Online, 28(1), 2176734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2176734
28. Okwu, E., Adeniran, O., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Patronage and use of library resources among Gen Z
undergraduates in Nigerian universities. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 5(1), 67–77.
https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v5i1.1492
29. Oladunjoye, M. T., Omiunu, O. G., & Yomi-Owojori, T. O. (2018). Information behavior of students
towards the use of library information resources in universities in Oyo State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy
and Practice (e-journal), Article 1834. University of Nebraska Lincoln.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1834
30. Olatoye, O. I. O., & Muchaonyerwa, N. (2020). Information needs and behavior of undergraduate
students towards the utilization of electronic information resources in selected South African universities.
Journal of Human Ecology, 69(1-3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566608.2020/69.1-3.3185
31. Oseghale, O. R., Ochie, C., Oyelere, M., & Nyantakyiwaa, A. (2025). Class participation points and
postgraduate business studentsengagement: The case of a UK university. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 62(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2279576
32. Ozor, A., & Toner, J. (2022). Information literacy behavior and practice: An assessment of undergraduate
students at Ada College of Education, Ghana. Journal of Library Administration, 62(1), 132–151.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.2006992
33. Salubi, O., Udem, O., & Tella, A. (2018). Library utilization and information behaviour of Generation Z
students in Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–18.
34. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z Goes to College. Jossey-Bass.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 5771
www.rsisinternational.org
35. Subaveerapandiyan, A., Lee, S., & Lim, T. (2023). Integrating information literacy instruction in ASEAN
higher education: Effects on student engagement and outcomes. Asian Journal of Information Literacy,
9(4), 101–119.
36. Tella, A., Mutula, S., & Salubi, O. (2020). Studentsuse of YouTube for academic learning in Nigerian
universities. Library Hi Tech News, 37(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2020-0033
37. Vighnarajah, F. A. H., Abd Aziz, N., & Siew Lee, O. (2016). Profiling information-seeking behaviour of
distance learning students in Wawasan Open University. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal,
11(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-09-2016-0026
38. Walton, G. (2017). Information literacy is a subversive activity: Developing a research-based theory of
information discernment. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 137–155.
https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2188
39. Weiner, S. A., Stephens, G., & Nour, A. Y. M. (2011). Information-seeking behaviors of first-semester
veterinary students: A preliminary report. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(1), 21–32.
https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.1.21
40. Wood, J. A. (2024). Library advocacy: Ecosystem concepts can provide a necessary framework for future
responsive libraries. Maine Policy Review, 33(2), 1–6. University of Maine Digital Commons.
https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol33/iss2/18