INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
The following subsections discuss the observed trends for each parameter and explain how these variations
influenced the overall performance of the aquaponic system. The results confirm that real-time monitoring plays
a vital role in maintaining water quality and supporting healthy growth of both aquatic and plant components.
pH and turbidity monitoring
The temporal dynamics of pH and turbidity over the 21-day monitoring period revealed a strong inverse
relationship between the two parameters. Fig.2 illustrates the inverse relationship between pH and turbidity
throughout the 21-day monitoring period. The pH values generally fluctuated between 6.5 and 8.5, with notable
peaks observed on Days 7-8 and Day 15, where levels reached approximately 8.2-8.4. These alkaline conditions
align with optimal ranges for nutrient solubility and fish–plant symbiosis in aquaponics systems (Goddek et al.,
2019; Chandramenon et al., 2024). Conversely, pronounced declines in pH were detected on Days 3-6, 12-13,
and 19-21, where minimum levels fell to approximately 6.5. Such reductions suggest episodic acidification
events likely associated with elevated organic load, microbial respiration, and suspended solids (Chandramenon
et al., 2024; Ani et al., 2022).
These changes can be understood through the natural biological processes happening inside the aquaponic
system. When uneaten feed and fish waste build up, they add organic matter to the water, encouraging bacteria
to break it down. During this breakdown, nitrifying bacteria convert ammonia (NH₃) into nitrite (NO₂⁻) and then
nitrate (NO₃⁻). This process uses up alkalinity and causes the water to become slightly more acidic. On the other
hand, when the system filters out solids effectively and has enough oxygen, the bacterial activity becomes more
balanced, turbidity goes down, and the pH returns to a slightly alkaline level. This interaction shows why it is
important to keep good filtration and aeration, to maintain steady water quality and avoid acidification that could
stress both the fish and the plants.
Turbidity, expressed in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), exhibited intermittent but sharp spikes
corresponding to these declines in pH. Peaks of 8-10 NTU occurred on Days 5- 6, 12-13 and 21, coinciding with
the lowest recorded pH values. In contrast, turbidity remained negligible (0.0 NTU) during periods when pH
was more stable and slightly alkaline, such as Days 7-11 and 14-17. This alternating pattern reinforces the strong
negative correlation between the parameters, with statistical analysis confirming a Pearson coefficient of –0.76
(p < .001, n=21) calculated using daily average values collected over the 21-day monitoring period. This finding
underscores the sensitivity of pH to turbidity fluctuations and suggests that increased particulate and microbial
activity directly compromise water buffering capacity (Abdullah & Mazalan, 2022; Raman & Vasmatkar, 2024).
These observations align with earlier studies that highlight how closely connected different water quality
indicators are in aquaponic systems and why monitoring them together is essential for maintaining system
efficiency (Ibrahim et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2021). The repeated fluctuations seen in this study suggest that
turbidity-related acidification is not a one-time event but a recurring issue, pointing to the need for flexible and
proactive management.
Although the 21-day experimental period was sufficient to validate system functionality and demonstrate initial
biological responses, it may not fully capture the long-term ecological stability or nutrient balance within the
aquaponic loop. Over time, processes such as biofilter maturation, microbial succession, and nutrient cycling
could alter water quality and growth dynamics. Future studies should therefore extend the monitoring period
across multiple growth cycles to evaluate sustained performance and long-term equilibrium.
Recent IoT-based monitoring tools now make it possible to track water conditions in real time and alert farmers
before serious imbalances occur (Thilakarathne et al., 2025; Yadav et al., 2025; Muthumalathi & Loganathan,
2025). Incorporating these technologies into aquaponic operations can help reduce nutrient-related risks,
maintain stable biological conditions, and support the long-term sustainability of the system (Nag et al., 2024;
Saha et al., 2025).
Furthermore, the findings reinforce the broader narrative on aquaponics as a sustainable yet delicate food
production system. Balancing nutrient cycling, water quality, and biological interactions is central to system
resilience (Goddek & Körner, 2019; Jose et al., 2025). By embedding IoT-based control, renewable energy
Page 6140