INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
algorithms. Enge, Spencer, and Stricchiola (2022) define SEO as "the art and science of making web pages
attractive to search engines" (p. 4), focusing primarily on ranking factors. This view is reinforced by King (2021),
who states that "SEO is the cornerstone of web visibility, encompassing everything from keyword research to
technical optimization" (p. 89).
Seminal works by Moran and Hunt (2022) in "Search Engine Marketing, Inc." further cement this association,
positioning SEO as the primary organic strategy within search engine marketing. Similarly, Fishkin
(2018) emphasizes that "while other channels drive traffic, SEO builds sustainable visibility that withstands
algorithm changes when done correctly" (p. 134). The technical orientation of this paradigm is evident in Clay's
(2016) comprehensive work, which details how "SEO focuses on optimizing content and site structure to
improve its relevance and authority" (p. 88).
This paradigm, while producing valuable insights into search engine algorithms, creates a conceptual silo that
potentially neglects other critical influences on digital visibility and performance.
The Emerging Holistic Paradigm
An alternative, integrative perspective conceptualizes Web Positioning as a broader discipline that orchestrates
multiple strategies across the digital ecosystem. Chaffey and Smith (2022) propose the "SOSTAC® framework"
for digital planning, where visibility strategy extends across paid, owned, and earned media, positioning SEO as
one component of a larger system.
Scott (2021) advances this concept through his "New Rules of Marketing and PR," arguing that "in the connected
economy, visibility is a function of creating remarkable content that is found across all digital channels—search,
social, email, and direct" (p. 56). This perspective is supported by Patel and Myers (2020), who demonstrate that
"companies integrating SEO with content marketing and social media achieve 2.3 times higher growth in organic
visibility than those focusing on SEO alone" (p. 112).
The theoretical foundation for this holistic view draws from integrated marketing communications theory,
applied to digital environments. Kotler, Kartajaya, and Setiawan (2021) in "Marketing 5.0" argue that "in the
digital age, positioning requires simultaneity across physical and digital touchpoints, leveraging technology,
connectivity, and data" (p. 78). This suggests that Web Positioning must transcend search engines to encompass
the entire customer journey.
METHOD
This study employed a systematic conceptual review methodology following the approach outlined by Webster
and Watson (2002) for analyzing conceptual structure in information systems research. The process involved
three phases:
First, a literature identification phase searched major academic databases (including Google Scholar, EBSCO
Business Source Complete, and Scopus) using keywords "web positioning," "SEO," "SEM," "digital marketing
strategy," "online visibility," and "search engine marketing." Professional texts from recognized industry
authorities were also included to capture practitioner perspectives.
Second, a conceptual analysis phase categorized definitions and conceptual boundaries of Web Positioning
across identified sources. This enabled quantification of the SEO-centric versus holistic perspectives. Content
analysis identified component strategies associated with Web Positioning in each source.
Third, an integrative synthesis contrasted theoretical frameworks with empirical evidence from the author's 18-
year implementation experience managing Cusco Store's digital strategy, which served as an extended case study
validating the practical application of the holistic model.
Page 6214