INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 659
www.rsisinternational.org
Gendered Food Environments: Differences in Food Availability and
Perceptions Among Malaysian University Students
M. Mohamad, R. Abu Kassim
Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Terengganu, Malaysia
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000056
Received: 29 September 2025; Accepted: 04 October 2025; Published: 03 November 2025
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates gender-based differences in food availability and perceptions of the food environment
among university students. The study draws a cross-sectional survey conducted among 397 students at UiTM
Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia, and explores how male and female students differ in their access to healthy
outlets, availability of nutritious snacks, exposure to unhealthy advertising, and perceptions of institutional
nutrition information. Chi-square analysis revealed significant gender differences: female students reported
easier access to healthy food outlets (²=18.739, =.003) and greater availability of healthy snacks (²=18.739,
<.001), while male students experienced more exposure to unhealthy food advertisements (²=11.819, =.019),
Females also perceived stringer institutional nutrition information (²=7.012, =.008). The findings underline
the necessity of gender-sensitive food policies that consider the unique challenges faced by both groups. The
paper contributes to the literature by contextualizing gendered food environments in Malaysia and offering policy
recommendations to foster healthier eating practices in university settings.
Keywords Gender, Food Availability, Food Environment, University Students, Nutrition Awareness
INTRODUCTION
University students worldwide face considerable challenges in maintaining healthy dietary patterns due to the
transition to independent living. Convenience, affordability, and time constraints often drive food choices,
leading to increased reliance on fast food and processed items. This situation is concerning because it coincides
with the formative years of adulthood, during which eating habits are established and carried into later life with
the increased risks of obesity and metabolic disorders [3],[4] .
Gender plays a significant role in dietary behavior. Research has consistently demonstrated that female students
tend to exhibit greater nutritional awareness and are more likely to seek healthier options, while male students
are often associated with higher consumption of calorie-dense and convenience foods [1],[2]. These differences
stem from cultural expectations, socialization process, and targeted marketing practices that reinforce distinct
food-related identities for men and women.
In Malaysia, the issue of student nutrition is compounded by the rapid growth of fast-food outlets and limited
access to affordable healthy alternatives, National surveys have shown an upward trend in overweight and
obesity prevalence among university-aged populations, with gender disparities in both dietary patterns and health
outcomes [13],[14]. These realities underscore the urgency of examining how gender shapes experience within
campus food environments.
Despite the recognition of gender as a determinant of dietary behavior, few studies in Malysia have examined
fender-specific differences in food availability and perceptions of food environments in higher education
institutions. Previous research has tended to focus on overall nutritional knowledge or general access issues
without disaggregating by gender, thus overlooking an important explanatory factor in student health outcomes
[9],[13].
This study addresses this gap by investigating gender differences in food availability and perceptions of the food
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 660
www.rsisinternational.org
environment among UiTM Dungun students. By highlighting disparities in snack availability, exposure to
unhealthy advertising, and perceptions of institutional nutrition information, this paper aims to provide evidence
for designing gender-sensitive interventions [5],[6],[7] that align with both educational and public health
priorities.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Gender differences in food choices have been widely documented across cultures. Sobal [1] explains that cultural
expectations shape men as consumers of meat and energy-dense foods, while women framed as health-conscious
eaters. This dichotomy influences not only individual choices but also how genders interact with institutional
food environments.
Hartmann et al. [2] found that women consistently reported higher concern for health and nutrition compared to
men, a finding echoed in other contexts where female students were more likely to check food labels [6] and
prefer balanced meals. These studies suggest that women may be more responsive to healthy food availability
when offered.
Research on campus food environments has disparities in access. Horacek et al. [5] observed that female students
often reported greater awareness of healthy food outlets near universities, while male students tended to rely
more on fast food due to convenience. Such findings align with the global trends [13] but require
contextualization in Malaysia settings.
Social norms and peer influence also shape gendered dietary behaviors. Male students may feel social pressure
to conform to unhealthy eating patterns such as frequenting fast-food outlets, while female student may face
expectations to maintain body image trough healthier food practices [4],[23]. These cultural pressures reinforce
gender-based consumption patterns.
Advertising plays a pivotal role in shaping dietary choices, often targeting males with promotions for energy-
dense and unhealthy foods. Boyland et al. [7] demonstrated that male students are more susceptible to unhealthy
advertising, which significantly increases their intake of fast food and sugary beverages. In Malaysia, Lee and
Tan [8] reported that gender-targeted marketing campaigns were prevalent in university settings.
Perceptions of nutrition also differ by gender. Women are more likely to seek and trust institutional sources of
dietary guidance, whereas men may downplay such information in favor of convenience [9],[20]. This difference
has implications for how universities design their health promotion initiatives.
Despite the availability of international research, empirical studies examining gender-specific food environments
in Malaysia remain limited. Previous work has often treated university students as homogeneous groups,
neglecting gendered perspectives. This study contributes to filling this gap by examining male and female
experiences in food availability and perceptions of the campus environment at UiTM Dungun [25],[26].
METHODOLOGY
This study utilized a cross-sectional survey design conducted among UiTM Dungun students, with a total of 397
participants selected through stratified random sampling. The questionnaire included items measuring food
availability (access to healthy outlets and nutritious snacks) and the food environment (exposure to unhealthy
advertising and perceptions of institutional nutrition information). Responses were measured using Likert scale.
Reliability was confirmed in pilot testing (α=.743). Data analysis using SPSS v27, with Chi-square tests
employed to identify significant gender differences. This design is justified because it enables the identification
of categorical differences across gender [10],[11], offering valuable insights into disparities that shape food
choices.
FINDINGS
Before analysing gender differences in food availability and the food environment, it is important to present
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 661
www.rsisinternational.org
profile of the respondents. As in Table 1, the study included 397 UiTM Dungun students, of whom 68.3%
(n=126) were male. Most respondents (91.7%) resided in on-campus college accommodation, while only 8.3%
lived off-campus. In terms of age distribution, 40.8% were between 18-19 years, 46.6% between 20-21 years,
and 12.6% between 22-24 years. With respect to the year of study, 37.0% were in their first year, 42.6% in their
second year, and 20.4% in their third year. Respondents were drawn from a diverse range of academic programs,
with representation from fields such as business, hospitality, science, and engineering. This demographic
diversity strengthens the validity of the findings by ensuring that the results accurately reflect the broader UiTM
Dungun student population.
The Chi-square analysis revealed significant gender differences in both food availability and the food
environment. Female students reported easier access to healthy food outlets (²=11.543, p=.003) and greater
availability of nutritious snacks (²=18.739, p<.001). In contrast, male students reported significantly higher
exposure to unhealthy food advertisements (²=11.819, p=.019). Female students also perceived stringer
institutional nutrition information (²=7.012, p=.008) [5][7][8]. Other variables such as overall access to
nutritious food and satisfaction with food variety did not significantly across gender, as all stated in Table II and
Table III.
Table I Demographic Profile
Variable
Category
Percentage (%)
Gender
Male
31.7
Female
68.3
Age
18-19 years
40.8
20-21 years
46.6
22-24 years
12.6
Year of study
Year 1
37.0
Year 2
42.6
Year 3
20.4
Accommodation
On-campus
91.7
Off-campus
8.3
Table II Gender Differences in Food Availability
Indicator
p-value
General access to nutritious food
.818
Easy access to healthy outlets
.0033*
Choosing healthy options when available
.358
Fast food consumption due to limited options
.236
Perceived accessibility of healthy food near campus
.638
Note: *p<.05 indicates statistically significant
Table III Gender Differences in Food Environment
Indicator
²
p-value
Availability of nutritious snacks
18.739
<.001*
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 662
www.rsisinternational.org
Exposure to unhealthy advertisements
11.819
.019*
Perception of university nutrition information
7.012
.008*
Satisfaction with food variety
4.356
.359
Healthy food availability in canteens
2.301
.681
Note: *p<.05 indicates statistically significant
DISCUSSION
The findings affirm that significantly influences students’ interaction with campus food environments. Female
students greater access to health outlets and snacks demonstrates not only structural availability but also
heightened awareness and demand for nutritious options. This support earlier claims that women tend to be more
health-conscious in the food practices [2],[6].
Conversely, male students’ greater exposure to unhealthy advertising reveals how targeted marketing strategies
exploit gendered preferences. Studies have shown that men are more likely to respond to promotions for fast
food and energy-dense items [7][8][25]. This aligns with our findings and underscores need for stricter
advertising regulations within university campuses.
From a theoretical standpoint, the Theory of Planned Behavior [10] offers insights into why the same
environment yields different outcomes for males and females. Attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived
behavioural control interact with health-related norms may explain their positives responses to nutrition
information, while men’s susceptibility to marketing reflects different normative pressures [9],[23].
Policy implications of these results are significant. Universities should consider gender-sensitive approaches to
promoting healthy eating, such as implementing healthy snack certification in cafeterias, limiting exposure to
unhealthy advertisements, and tailoring nutrition education programs to resonate with both genders
[12],[14],[19]. Peer-led initiatives by female students could be particularly effective in creating supportive
environments.
Despite its contributions, the study has limitations. Self-reported data may be subject to bias, and the cross-
sectional design prevents causal inferences [15],[16],[28]. Nevertheless, the findings justify future research
employing longitudinal and qualitative methods to better capture lived experiences. Further comparative studies
across campuses could help generalise the results and refine gender-sensitive strategies.
CONCLUSION
This study provides empirical evidence of significant gender differences in food availability and perceptions of
the food environment among UiTM Dungun students. Female students reported greater access to healthy outlets
and snacks and stronger perceptions of institutional nutrition information, while male students were more
exposed to unhealthy advertising [13],[14]. These differences highlight the gendered nature of campus food
environments.
The implications of these findings are clear: universities must adopt gender-sensitive policies to promote
healthier eating behaviors. Practical recommendations include restricting unhealthy food advertising, subsiding
healthy options, and expanding health promotion initiatives tailored to different gender groups. These
recommendations align with WHO’s nutrition policy briefs [22].
Future research should adopt mixed-method approaches, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative
interviews of focus groups to capture the nuanced social and cultural factors in shaping gendered food
environments. Such integration would offer deeper insights into behavioural motivation and contextual
influences that are not easily quantifiable. Longitudinal studies should also be conducted to examine how food
choices and perceptions evolve over time, thereby providing stronger evidence for causal relationships.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 663
www.rsisinternational.org
Expanding the research across multiple campuses in different regions in Malaysia would further enhance
generalizability and allow comparisons across diverse institutional and cultural contexts. Collectively, the future
directions will strengthen the evidence base for developing inclusive, data-driven strategies to promote healthy
eating among university populations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to express their gratitude to University Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for providing the
institutional support and access to students that make this research possible. Special thanks are also extended to
the participating students for their valuable time and cooperation in completing the survey.
REFERENCES
1. Sobal, J. (2005). Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food and Foodways, 13(12), 135
158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710590915409
2. Hartmann, C., Dohle, M., & Siegrist, M. (2018). Importance of eating habits for the overall quality of
diet in adults: Gender differences. Nutrition Research, 56, 1422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2018.04.002
3. Chang, H., Kim, S., & Parker, J. (2023). Nutritional challenges among university students. Journal of
Adolescent Nutrition & Health, 29 (2), 120135.
4. Li, Y., & Morgan, T. (2022). Health risks associated with poor dietary practices. Global Perspectives
on Student Health, 18 (4), 6783.
5. Horacek, T. M., et al. (2013). Evaluation of the food store environment. American Journal of Health
Promotion, 27 (4), e81e90. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.120606-QUAL-286
6. Wardle, J., Parmenter, K., & Waller, J. (2000). Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite, 34 (3),
269275. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0311
7. Boyland, E. J., et al. (2016). Advertising as a cue to consume. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
103 (2), 519533. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.120857
8. Lee, F., & Tan, H. (2022). Targeted food advertising in university settings. Appetite, 168, 105678.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105678
9. Yahya, N., et al. (2022). Nutrition knowledge versus eating behaviour. International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12 (9), 11231137.
10. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 50 (2), 179211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
11. Laska, M. N., et al. (2022). College students’ eating patterns. Journal of American College Health, 56
(6), 629634.
12. Larson, N., et al. (2013). College food environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44 (3),
226231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.009
13. Rashid, R., & Ali, A. (2021). Determinants of unhealthy eating habits. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition,
27 (3), 311320.
14. Rahman, B., et al. (2021). Creating healthy food ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 18 (12), 6321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126321
15. Smith, D., et al. (2020). Food access and student well-being. Journal of American College Health, 68
(5), 502510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1583661
16. Walker, R., et al. (2010). Disparities and access to healthy food. Health & Place, 16 (5), 876884.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.002
17. Caspi, C., et al. (2012). Food environment and diet quality. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition
and Physical Activity, 9, 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-127
18. Gordon, C., et al. (2011). Food environment and store availability. Journal of Nutrition Education and
Behavior, 43(3), 257263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.07.007
19. Pelletier, J., & Laska, M. (2012). Balancing healthy meals. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,
44 (6), 573576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2012.04.002
20. Lim, H. C., & Tan, W. M. (2021). Food knowledge and label interpretation. Malaysian Journal of
Nutrition, 27 (3), 315324.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 664
www.rsisinternational.org
21. Adams, R., et al. (2023). Dietary habits and mental health outcomes. Journal of Psychological Research,
45 (3), 276284.
22. World Health Organization. (2023). Nutrition literacy and gender disparities: Global policy brief.
WHO.
23. Jones, L., et al. (2022). Impact of dietary patterns on mood. International Journal of Mental Health &
Nutrition, 21 (4), 234241.
24. Jones, M., et al. (2021). Poor nutrition and metabolic health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68 (4), 489
495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.008
25. Lim, N., et al. (2023). Exposure to unhealthy food marketing. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition, 29 (1),
4558.
26. Jahan, F., & Wahab, M. (2021). Food availability and eating habits. Journal of Food Studies, 19 (3),
8998.
27. Johnson, E. (2021). Determinants of student satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 62
(3), 345360. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0033
28. & Zhang, T. (2021). Nutritional habits and health implications. Journal of American College Health, 69
(3), 18.
29. Levine, M. (2018). Social media and food choices. Current Diabetes Reviews, 14 (3), 243249.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399813666170606103306
30. Kearney, N., et al. (2000). Sociodemographic determinants of food choice. Public Health Nutrition, 3
(2), 219226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898000000024X