Camille’s homecoming voyages trigger the slow resurfacing of her past trauma, a trauma that is now no longer
able to fit within the covers of a manuscript. The manuscript attempted to disguise her hate for State
Assemblyman Stephen Bright, a man whom she labels ‘father’ and, perhaps… no. This is not to say that the
memories of a traumatic event are in any case ever far away. They are poised to be confronted. (Freud, 37).
As time progresses, most people tend to ponder about what they are able to recall during and following
significant trauma episodes. Within our minds, we cannot completely erase our personal traumas, and
repressed memories may arise through different forms. For Camille, revisiting Wind Gap is yet another tap on
the shoulder of repressed memories. In this instance, Camille recalls episodes of violence and discord within
and without. van der Kolk is correct to characterize Camille's self-wounding as a gruesome and palpable echo
of pain, suffering, and disunity, entangled with other unresolved matters. Actions can also bear trauma, and
Camille illustrates this perfectly. The phenomenological self-violence, and the traumatic self-violence is the
horrible stressors of the body. The self-injurious behavior is even more agonizing and utterly excruciating, the
'satisfaction' of trauma, which the rest of the society is ready to embrace.
Camille’s actions are an illustration of van der Kolk’s concept the body “keeps the score”, since her scars are
an imprint of her trauma. The trauma in Camille’s life trauma lies concealed and uncovered in psychological
markings of her body trauma in which the body becomes a site of mastery and resistance into memories and
feelings. Outside of trauma theory and its bounds, feminist scholars have considered sharp objects as a critique
to the systems of patriarchy in which the suffering of women is both birthed and hidden. Showalter looks at the
lack of attention paid to, or the medical attention given to, women’s pain in history, which, in the most
concrete form, is the way those around Camille’s pain attend to her pain ( Shoalter 95). Camille’s self-
injurious behavior is part of the larger framework of behaviors attributed to women, which tend to be ignored,
or rather, framed as mental disorders; a systematic attempt to do away with the suffering of women, This
adheres to feminist critiques on women and mental health pathology. Flynn's portrayal of Camille
simultaneously captured as both a victim and a survivor diverges from the traditional accounts of women's
victimhood as solely medical or moral deficiency.
The abuse Adora suffers in ‘Climbing Adora’ closely resembles maternal cruelty, a theme Flynn has examined
elsewhere, in which she masterfully pretends to inflict soul-destroying pain, as illustrated in Adora Kerlin. The
figure is wholly. The former is a tactical exploration of the dynamics of maternal cruelty and the associated
futures it holds. Emotionally, the cruelty ‘Adora’ waged against ‘Camille’ and her other daughter ‘Marianne’
stands as the most representative. Denial in a maternal setting is equally denial of abuse as denial of neglect
and emotional abuse is…. Maternal neglect and emotional cruelty is Abuse a mother is capable of inflicting
onto a child is masked as tender and nurturing parental care. Camille’s existence in the Various forms of
injurious behavior people commit to each other in a private domestic space before a judge and the novel
exposes and injures the offense. Such neglect deepens the bondage of neglect where the injury passes on from
generation to generation in a snowballing pattern. Research on the intergenerational transmission of injuries
inflicted by sharp objects illuminates rather clearly and in detail, the sharp. Such sharp things cut through the
web of violence within lines of family affiliation. Bondage of violence, so thick, so palpable and perhaps so
freely avoidable. Herman p. 50. Part of the case of a daughter who attempts to understand a mother’s abuse
and the arm’s length consequences of abuse and neglect in case of being adult is described by. To make sense
of the case, he almost exclusively relies on Camille’s narrative.”
From the perspective of Camille, the storyline is rather captivating in terms of its silence, especially with what
it has to offer.The pain and suffering, as well as the source of which, is the trauma experienced by a familial
unit is what strikes the most. Across painful generations, spaces also become increasingly inhospitable,
drawing suffering. The trauma undoing in more recent memory does not have in essence a comprehensive
narrative, according to Carruth, “it scrams up.” (Onset trauma is painful, “scrams” too, and erupts at pain's
highest white heat.) Flynn demonstrates this in Camille. The memories of the past she resolves in how to carry
trauma. Timeline. These memories also serve as a narrative device illustrating realities of pain. Pain is no
single-episode, and in trauma, time and memories become a part of trauma's images.