INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 7931
University Unionism. Reflection and Commitment
Saul Agustin Sosa Castelan, Luz Yoko Skewes Florez, David Lopez Romero
*
Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo
* Corresponding Author
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000649
Received: 26 October 2025; Accepted: 04 November 2025; Published: 20 November 2025
ABSTRACT
Labor relations establish links between employers and workers and are essential for the smooth running of
companies, factories, and service providers. In general, they are the guiding force behind the proper
functioning of the labor community and its workplace. The history of labor unions is not easy; its complexity
allows us to understand the different movements throughout history in search of better working conditions and
social justice. From differences in paid activities to the establishment of working hours, labor relations range
from the most basic to the most elaborate activities. In the field of education, it is possible to find that the
relations between the academic workforce and the employers are a good example for analyzing the importance
of academic unionism, particularly at the university level. In this way, university unionism not only has the
challenge of defending working conditions but also develops opportunities for these conditions to improve, not
only in the workplace but also as a guarantee of maintaining the functioning of educational institutions and
defending the quality of education and the training of students committed to society.
Keywords: Work, union, labor relations, university.
INTRODUCTION
Organized labor has its roots in the formation of labor, trade, and activity communities. It arose as an intrinsic
need to defend the human condition through the protection of rights and equality. From the guilds of the 17th
century and the trade districts of the 18th century to the great movements of the 19th and early 20th centuries,
history shows the struggle and organization to avoid occupational hazards, exhausting working hours, child
labor, and a lack of commitment to employer obligations [3].
The truth is that deprivation, hunger, unemployment, job instability, and lack of compensation for occupational
hazards drove workers, artisans, laborers, and most of all, peasants who had migrated to urban centers, to seek
out mutual aid societies and production and consumer cooperatives, centers of speculation, awareness, and
struggle for the defense and achievement of their subsistence. In this way, the groups became societies of
resistance against employers and the state, representing a possible serious precursor to trade unionism in
Mexico [8].
It is worth mentioning that the origin lies in the labor movements that later defined the category of class. The
communist economic model promoted the participation of commissions in corporate decision-making and
public policy derived from the state toward labor legislation.
In the second half of the 20th century, neoliberalism generated new forms of labor relations with short-term
contracts, layoffs, and mass rehiring in order to eliminate employer commitments, avoid continuity, and
renounce seniority. Most unions resisted, while others lost the battle under pressure from employers by
demanding too much and lacking a vision of the market and production.
As Blanke [1] points out, trade unions in Mexico originated during the development of the welfare state, which
benefited the establishment of highly bureaucratized and large-scale organizations and institutions. in some
cases, unions became part of the state, and class struggle was replaced by negotiation within the state; union
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 7932
representation was limited to the union's ability to achieve good economic and material exchanges with the
state and employers through large agreements; The representation of workers' interests was indirect, although
it did negotiate real wage increases, benefits, job guarantees, and the extension of social security. The
democracy formally established in the union statutes had nothing to do with the decisions made by the rank
and file, which was controlled but not necessarily illegitimate. Although decisions were difficult, the grassroots
struggle for real improvements did not end. In this sense, it is possible to affirm that The transformation of the
economy has been profound and encompasses all sectors; macroeconomic and financial stabilization has been
underpinned by significant structural changes; the adjustment of public finances, trade liberalization, economic
deregulation, financial liberalization, and the process of divestiture of public enterprises. Above all, however,
the most serious issue is that this modernization has been achieved by disregarding social interests, even
consciously sacrificing them and betting that this neglect will have no repercussions. However, the
internationalization of economies has had serious consequences, transforming labor relations and changing
workers' perspectives, with significant differences depending, of course, on the role that each country plays in
globalization [1].
University unions
In this area and with very similar purposes, educational unionism emerged, within which university unionism,
whose characteristics are specific to the activities of higher and upper secondary education taught at
universities, is generated through the principle of freedom, whether in teaching or research, the two fields
where autonomy bears enormous fruit for society by training professionals and generating knowledge, thus
fulfilling the social character of the university [2]. The word “university” comes from the concept of
universality, which is the basis of the saying, “Nothing human is alien to me. The autonomy of public
universities is the conscience of the nation. Therefore, the state has an obligation to protect their integrity and
encourage their full development. Despite countless limitations, problems, and even attacks on autonomy,
university unionism is an example of the labor resistance of academic staff [4].
One of the problems faced by the various university unions lies in budgetary criteria, since the economic
sustenance of public universities comes mainly from resources provided by the State. The annual negotiations
over budget allocations take on special significance in light of the chain of federal budget cuts that occur year
after year. Many voices are raised in defense of their resources, arguing that these are fundamental areas for
development; however, these requests from public higher education institutions have not been properly heard,
valued, or addressed [5]. Public universities are particularly affected by the substantial reductions in their
financial resources; the subsidy that the federal government provides to these institutions is becoming
increasingly insufficient, to the detriment of teaching, research, and cultural outreach programs. These
economic phenomena, which are completely beyond the control of public universities, are causing a gradual
and serious deterioration in higher education in our country. The money currently allocated to public
universities is only enough for their subsistence; it does not encourage them to achieve academic excellence
[6].
In this sense, we are seeking a way for unions and employers to join forces for the benefit of the university
community. For example, through the Federal Labor Law, which establishes that in public and autonomous
institutions that provide higher education, labor relations are directed toward seeking social justice among
workers and leave aside the perspective of balance between the factors of production, labor, and capital. In
universities, there are academic and administrative workers whose labor rights must be respected. However, in
the university environment, there are values that must be taken into account for the proper exercise of these
rights. In public universities, there is no private capital seeking profit. They are at the service of the nation,
serving society without discrimination or prejudice. That is why, in universities, labor relations between
workers and institutions seek balance and social justice [9].
Unions of academic and administrative workers at the university, as the case may be, and the leadership of
those unions, can only be made up of workers who provide their services at each university. Workers from
different universities cannot join together in a university union. This provision helps to preserve university
autonomy [7].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 7933
In contrast, general legislation provides for industrial unions, made up of workers who provide their services in
two or more companies in the same industrial branch, and national industry unions, made up of workers who
provide their services in one or more companies in the same industrial branch, located in two or more federal
entities.
Unions at each university may be for academic staff, administrative staff, etc. In collective agreements, labor
provisions relating to academic workers do not extend to administrative workers, nor do labor provisions for
administrative workers cover academic workers, except where expressly agreed in collective agreements [3].
CONCLUSIONS
It is important to consider that the struggle to improve working conditions is a long road. The beginning of the
labor relationship was formed through dissatisfaction with the deplorable conditions in which the work was
carried out. The participation of labor organizations through unions has narrowed the gap between inadequate
and fair conditions [5].
In this sense, societies require decent unions because they visualize and materialize short-, medium-, and long-
term benefits. Social justice is manifested through collective bargaining agreements.
In the case of academic unions, mainly university unions, they not only fight for better economic and working
conditions, but also face the challenges of raising the level of society through decent higher education,
committed to society from a universal vision of culture, science, and comprehensive knowledge.
University unionism cannot and must not be silenced; it must fight and focus its energies on improving the
working conditions of its members; that is its natural and legitimate function. Universities are the mind of the
country, they are the temple of knowledge from which the voice and reason that guide society emerge.
That is why we must learn from the past, reflect on the present, and visualize the future through university
union work in order to achieve labor and institutional stability and consolidate the university project with
firmness and conviction.
REFERENCES
1. Blanke, S. (2007). El sindicalismo mexicano: entre la marginación y la recomposición. NUEVA
SOCIEDAD No 211, 15.
2. Bouzas Ortiz, J. A. (2000). Democracia sindical en México NUEVA SOCIEDAD 169.
3. Cristancho Giraldo, Laura Andrea. (2022). El concepto de trabajo: perspectiva hisrica. Secuencia,
(112), e1827. Epub 07 marzo de 2022
4. Jáuregui, J. A. C. (2017). Un testimonio sobre la formación del sindicalismo universitario en la
Universidad de Guanajuato como una lucha social que no debe olvidarse. Naturaleza y Tecnología,
(12).
5. Lucassen, Jan. (2014). The History of Work and Labour. Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische
Geschiedenis/ The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History. 11. 65-83.
10.18352/tseg.132
6. Machicado, J. (2010). Sindicalismo y Sindicato. https://ermoquisbert.tripod.com/pdfs/dt19-
sindicato.pdf
7. Morales Owseykoff, T. & Olivares Galván, H R (2022). El sindicalismo universitario en México y las
relaciones laborales. Horizontes de la Contaduría en las Ciencias Sociales, (16).
8. Santos Azuela, H. (1994). El sindicalismo en México 1a. ed. Porrúa.
9. Zárate, R. L. (2022). El sindicalismo universitario. PRIMERA PARTE, 95.