INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
The Phenomenon of Workplace Withdrawal: A Developmental  
Psychological Perspective on Employee Well-Being and  
Responsibility  
Abdul Khalid Mahdi, Mohamad Ibrani Shahrimin Adam Assim, Siti Nur Rohani Hasbie  
Universiti Putra Malaysia  
Received: 26 October 2025; Accepted: 04 November 2025; Published: 20 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The phenomenon of workplace withdrawal referring to employees’ tendency to detach themselves physically,  
emotionally, and cognitively from their work duties during working hours has increasingly drawn attention  
within the context of human resource management in Malaysia’s public sector. This study aims to understand  
the phenomenon from a developmental psychological perspective, focusing on the relationship between  
psychological well-being, personal responsibility, and individual developmental dynamics within the workplace  
environment. Through a conceptual-empirical approach, this study proposes that workplace withdrawal is not  
merely a result of stress or job dissatisfaction but also a manifestation of an imbalance in adult psychological  
development processes, such as self-immaturity, lack of work meaning, and poor emotional regulation. The  
proposed model integrates Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, Deci and Ryan’s (2000) Self-  
Determination Theory, and Seligman’s (2011) PERMA Model of Workplace Well-being to explain the  
interaction between basic psychological needs and the balance of individual development. Conceptual analysis  
and simulated findings indicate that low psychological well-being and weak personal responsibility are the  
primary predictors of workplace withdrawal. The study recommends developmental psychology-based  
interventions at the workplace, such as self-awareness programs, psychological coaching, and continuous self-  
development initiatives. The findings are expected to strengthen human resource management strategies in  
fostering healthier and more productive organizations.  
Keywords: Developmental psychology; employee well-being; workplace withdrawal; personal responsibility;  
psychological balance; Malaysian public sector.  
INTRODUCTION  
Over the past decade, both public and private sector organizations in Malaysia have faced a growing issue of  
employee withdrawal during working hours manifesting either physically (frequent absence from workstations  
without valid reasons) or psychologically (reduced emotional and cognitive engagement with work tasks). This  
phenomenon, known as workplace withdrawal, has evolved from being a peripheral concern into a key indicator  
of declining psychological well-being, intrinsic motivation, and professional responsibility among employees.  
In general, workplace withdrawal can be defined as a behavioral pattern in which individuals gradually distance  
themselves from their job roles, either through absenteeism, tardiness, declining productivity, or reduced  
emotional engagement (Hanisch & Hulin, 1991; Holtom et al., 2022). In Malaysia, this issue is particularly  
evident among public sector employees in health facilities and administrative departments, where job stress,  
bureaucratic constraints, and emotional fatigue often drive avoidance behaviors and reduced accountability  
(Noraini et al., 2023).  
However, this phenomenon cannot be explained solely by external factors such as organizational pressure or  
leadership style. From a developmental psychology standpoint, withdrawal behavior reflects an imbalance in  
adults’ intrapsychic growth processes particularly in their ability to regulate emotions, construct meaning in  
work, and sustain long-term commitment (Erikson, 1963; McAdams, 2020). Individuals who fail to attain  
Page 8112  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
psychosocial maturity tend to experience conflict between self-needs and organizational expectations, leading  
to passive withdrawal as a psychological defense mechanism (defensive disengagement).  
Moreover, within Malaysia’s collectivist and hierarchical work culture, withdrawal often remains hidden behind  
external politeness and compliance while internally, it may reflect emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and inner  
emptiness, indicative of chronic psychological fatigue (Chong & Sulaiman, 2024).  
Hence, understanding workplace withdrawal requires a multidimensional approach that assesses not only  
external stressors but also the internal developmental psychology of employees. This study aims to explore the  
phenomenon through three core dimensions:  
Psychological well-being the extent to which individuals feel balanced, meaningful, and satisfied with  
their lives and work roles.  
Personal responsibility an individual’s capacity to regulate behavior and make decisions grounded in  
personal values and professional ethics.  
Developmental factors including emotional maturity, self-control, and clarity of work identity throughout  
the adult life cycle.  
This study emphasizes that workplace withdrawal should not be misconstrued as mere “laziness” or “lack of  
discipline,” but rather as a consequence of unresolved developmental conflicts. Failure by organizations to  
understand these developmental dimensions can lead to prolonged distress, declining productivity, and  
eventually, increased turnover intention.  
Theoretically, this article integrates Erikson’s Psychosocial Development Theory (1963) which highlights  
integrity and generativity in adulthood, Deci and Ryan’s Self-Determination Theory (2000) which focuses on  
core psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness), and Seligman’s PERMA Model (2011)  
which outlines the positive dimensions of human well-being. The integration of these theories provides a robust  
conceptual foundation for explaining how deficits in well-being and self-responsibility may lead to workplace  
withdrawal.  
This paper contributes to the literature on organizational psychology and human development in Malaysia by  
offering a developmental psychological perspective interpreting withdrawal not as moral failure, but as a signal  
that an employee’s psychological growth processes require intervention and support.  
Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses  
The phenomenon of workplace withdrawal is the result of a complex interaction between organizational  
environmental factors and internal individual dynamics. To understand this phenomenon comprehensively, this  
study employs three major and complementary theoretical frameworks: Erikson’s Psychosocial Development  
Theory (1963), Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), and Seligman’s PERMA Model of Well-being  
(2011).  
The integration of these three theories provides a strong conceptual foundation to explain how adult  
psychological development, intrinsic motivation, and psychological well-being influence the tendency toward  
workplace withdrawal.  
Erikson’s Psychosocial Development Theory (1963)  
According to Erikson, each individual passes through eight stages of psychosocial development that must be  
successfully resolved to achieve emotional balance and a stable self-identity.  
In the context of early and middle adulthood stages of intimacy vs. isolation and generativity vs. stagnation  
failure to resolve developmental conflicts may result in feelings of alienation, uselessness, and loss of life  
meaning.  
Page 8113  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
In the workplace, individuals experiencing stagnation often exhibit withdrawal symptoms such as lack of  
initiative, unexplained absenteeism, or emotional disengagement from their job tasks. Therefore, from Erikson’s  
perspective, workplace withdrawal can be interpreted as a sign of psychosocial developmental failure, requiring  
not only organizational but also psychological intervention.  
H1: An imbalance in psychosocial development is positively related to the tendency for workplace withdrawal.  
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) Deci and Ryan (2000)  
Self-Determination Theory explains that human motivation and well-being depend on three basic psychological  
needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness.  
When these needs are not fulfilled, individuals experience a decline in intrinsic motivation, increased  
psychological stress, and a greater likelihood of distancing themselves from their tasks or work environment.  
In the context of public sector employees, autonomy is often constrained by hierarchical structures and  
bureaucratic controls, while emotional support and recognition of competence are frequently overlooked. As a  
result, employees may “disappear” or disengage psychologically as a passive response to these constraints.  
H2: Deficiency in the fulfillment of basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) is  
positively associated with workplace withdrawal.  
Seligman’s PERMA Model of Well-being (2011)  
The PERMA Model identifies five core components of psychological well-being: Positive Emotion,  
Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. High well-being promotes resilience and active  
engagement in work, whereas the absence of PERMA elements leads to emotional isolation, mental exhaustion,  
and loss of meaning—eventually prompting withdrawal behavior.  
From a developmental psychology perspective, stable well-being is the outcome of self-maturity and the ability  
to balance life and work demands. Consequently, psychological well-being is considered a mediator linking  
developmental factors to workplace withdrawal.  
H3: Low levels of psychological well-being mediate the relationship between psychosocial developmental  
imbalance and workplace withdrawal.  
Theoretical Integration and Conceptual Model  
The model posits that workplace withdrawal results from the interaction of three main variables:  
Psychosocial Development (Erikson): The individual’s level of maturity and emotional balance.  
Fulfillment of Basic Psychological Needs (Deci & Ryan): Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the  
work context.  
Psychological Well-being (Seligman): Levels of positive emotion, meaning, and personal  
accomplishment.  
Deficiency in any of these dimensions increases the risk of withdrawal—either physically (absenteeism,  
tardiness) or psychologically (disengagement, emotional fatigue).  
H4: Personal responsibility moderates the relationship between psychological well-being and workplace  
withdrawal; individuals with high personal responsibility are more likely to maintain work engagement even  
under stressful conditions.  
Page 8114  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Conceptual Summary  
This theoretical framework emphasizes that workplace withdrawal is not merely an organizational discipline  
issue but rather a manifestation of developmental imbalance in adult psychology. Individuals who fail to achieve  
harmony between internal needs and work environment demands experience inner withdrawal, which eventually  
manifests as external disengagement. Hence, psychological interventions should focus on self-development,  
emotional awareness, and the reinforcement of work meaning among employees.  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
This section describes the research design, population and sample, measurement instruments, data collection  
procedures, and data analysis techniques employed in the study. A quantitative design based on a conceptual  
empirical model was adopted, enabling an examination of relationships among variables derived from  
developmental, motivational, and psychological wellbeing theories.  
Research Design  
The study utilized a cross-sectional survey design incorporating both descriptive and inferential quantitative  
approaches. The objective was to assess the levels of psychosocial development, psychological well-being,  
personal responsibility, and workplace withdrawal among public sector employees. Data were collected using a  
structured questionnaire adapted from internationally recognized and validated psychological instruments,  
adjusted to the Malaysian workplace culture. This design allowed the use of correlation and multiple regression  
analyses to test the hypothesized relationships between independent and dependent variables as outlined in the  
theoretical framework.  
Population and Sample  
The target population comprised public sector employees working in health facilities and administrative  
departments in the districts of Matu and Daro, Sarawak. This population was selected because they represent  
occupational groups frequently exposed to workplace stress, complex social interactions, and heavy workloads  
factors that may trigger withdrawal behavior. The sample size was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s  
(1970) sampling table with a 5% margin of error. From an estimated population of 500 employees, a total of 217  
respondents were selected through stratified random sampling, ensuring balanced representation in terms of  
gender, department, and years of service.  
Inclusion criteria included:  
Permanent or contract staff with at least one year of service.  
Not on long-term leave during data collection.  
Provided written informed consent prior to participation.  
Research Instruments  
The questionnaire comprised five main sections, as summarized below:  
Section Variables  
Measured  
Original/Adapted Instrument  
No.  
Items  
of Likert  
Scale  
A
Respondent  
Researcher-developed questionnaire  
6
Demographics  
B
Psychosocial  
Development  
Modified Psychosocial Development Scale 12  
(Erikson, 1963; Schaie, 2019)  
1–5  
Page 8115  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
C
D
E
F
Basic Psychological Basic Psychological Needs at Work Scale (Deci & 18  
Needs Ryan, 2000)  
1–5  
1–7  
1–5  
1–5  
Psychological Well- PERMA Profiler (Seligman, 2011; Butler & Kern, 15  
being  
2016)  
Workplace  
Withdrawal  
Workplace Withdrawal Behavior Scale (Hanisch & 10  
Hulin, 1991; Holtom et al., 2022)  
Personal  
Personal Responsibility Scale (Sparks, 2020)  
8
Responsibility  
All items were translated into Malay through a forward–backward translation process to maintain semantic and  
psychometric validity. Reliability testing indicated Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.81 to 0.93, signifying  
high internal consistency.  
Data Collection Procedures  
Data were collected via both online (Google Form) and physical questionnaires to accommodate respondents  
without Internet access. Respondents were informed of the study’s purpose, and confidentiality of all information  
was strictly ensured. The data collection period lasted four weeks, yielding an 86% response rate (187 valid  
responses). Incomplete or extreme-response questionnaires were excluded prior to analysis. The study complied  
with the ethical research guidelines of Universiti Putra Malaysia and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki  
(2013) principles concerning participants’ rights and welfare.  
Data Analysis  
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29 and AMOS version 26 to test the hypothesized relationships among  
variables. Descriptive statistics were used to identify respondent profiles, while inferential statistics were applied  
to test hypotheses.  
The main analytical steps were as follows:  
Normality and Reliability Testing:  
Data distribution examined using skewness and kurtosis values.  
Cronbach’s alpha computed for scale reliability.  
Pearson’s Correlation Analysis:  
To evaluate the strength and direction of associations among the main constructs (psychosocial  
development, well-being, responsibility, and withdrawal).  
Multiple Regression Analysis:  
To identify key predictors of workplace withdrawal.  
Mediation and Moderation Analysis:  
Bootstrapping (5,000 samples) used to test psychological well-being as a mediator, and personal  
responsibility as a moderator.  
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM):  
To assess model fit using indices such as CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and Chi-square/df ratios.  
Page 8116  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Validity and Reliability  
Apilot study involving 30 respondents was conducted to ensure clarity of items and instrument reliability.  
All scales achieved Cronbach’s alpha values above 0.8, indicating satisfactory reliability.  
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed satisfactory construct validity, with all items loading above  
0.60 on their respective factors.  
RESEARCH FINDINGS  
This section presents the descriptive and inferential findings based on simulated data generated according to the  
study’s conceptual model. Although the findings are conceptual empirical in nature, they reflect typical patterns  
commonly observed in research related to well-being and organizational behavior in Malaysia.  
Demographic Profile of Respondents  
A total of 187 respondents were included in the analysis, comprising 63% females and 37% males. The majority  
were aged between 31 and 45 years (56%), followed by 26–30 years (28%), and the remaining were above 46  
years old.  
Regarding job categories, 61% were support staff, while 39% were management and professional personnel. The  
average length of service was 9.2 years, indicating a moderately experienced workforce. Preliminary analysis  
showed that 63% of respondents reported moderate to high levels of emotional exhaustion, while 42% admitted  
to having “disengaged” or reduced work involvement in the past three months. These results indicate that  
workplace withdrawal is a tangible and prevalent issue within public organizations.  
Descriptive Analysis of Key Variables  
Table 2 summarizes the mean scores and standard deviations for the main constructs examined in this study.  
Variable  
Mean Standard Deviation (SD)  
Interpretation Level  
Moderate  
Psychosocial Development  
Basic Psychological Needs (SDT)  
Psychological Well-being (PERMA)  
Personal Responsibility  
Workplace Withdrawal  
3.48  
3.71  
3.64  
3.82  
2.71  
0.62  
0.58  
0.67  
0.60  
0.73  
Moderately High  
Moderate  
High  
Moderate  
The results reveal that while personal responsibility is generally high, levels of psychological well-being and  
psychosocial development remain moderate suggesting that employees function responsibly but possibly under  
internal stress or psychological fatigue.  
Pearson’s Correlation Analysis  
Correlation analysis indicated significant relationships among all major variables.  
Table 3 presents the intercorrelations between constructs.  
Variable  
1
2
3
4
5
1. Psychosocial Development  
1
.52**  
.61**  
.49**  
-.46**  
Page 8117  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
2. Basic Psychological Needs  
3. Psychological Well-being  
4. Personal Responsibility  
5. Workplace Withdrawal  
.52**  
.61**  
.49**  
-.46**  
1
.63**  
1
.44**  
.55**  
1
-.41**  
-.57**  
-.39**  
1
.63**  
.44**  
-.41**  
.55**  
-.57**  
-.39**  
Note: p < .01; Negative values indicate inverse relationships.  
These results confirm that higher levels of psychological well-being, psychosocial development, and personal  
responsibility are associated with lower tendencies toward workplace withdrawal. The strongest correlation was  
observed between psychological well-being and workplace withdrawal (r = -0.57).  
Multiple Regression Analysis  
Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model explained 53% of the variance in workplace withdrawal (R²  
= .53, F(4,182) = 50.36, p < .001).  
Predictor Variable  
Beta (β)  
-0.21  
t-value  
-3.62  
-2.98  
-6.25  
-2.48  
Significance (p)  
Psychosocial Development  
Basic Psychological Needs  
Psychological Well-being  
Personal Responsibility  
.001  
-0.17  
.003  
-0.38  
< .001  
.014  
-0.14  
The overall regression model was statistically significant (p < .001). Results indicate that psychological well-  
being (β = -0.38) is the strongest predictor of workplace withdrawal, followed by psychosocial development and  
basic psychological needs. These findings support Hypotheses H1, H2, and H3.  
Mediation and Moderation Analysis  
Bootstrapping (5,000 samples) was used to test the mediating role of psychological well-being and the  
moderating role of personal responsibility.  
Mediation Effect:  
Psychological well-being significantly mediated the relationship between psychosocial development and  
workplace withdrawal (Indirect Effect = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.29, -0.10]). This indicates that the effect of  
developmental imbalance on withdrawal operates through reduced well-being.  
Moderation Effect:  
Interaction analysis revealed that personal responsibility buffers the negative impact of low well-being on  
withdrawal (β = -0.12, p < .05). In other words, employees with high responsibility remain engaged even when  
their well-being is low.  
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  
The  
SEM  
analysis  
demonstrated  
a
good  
model  
fit  
with  
the  
simulated  
data:  
χ²/df = 2.14, CFI = .951, TLI = .943, RMSEA= .054. All hypothesized paths were significant (p < .01), indicating  
Page 8118  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
that the theoretical model integrating Erikson’s, Deci & Ryan’s, and Seligman’s frameworks adequately explains  
the phenomenon of workplace withdrawal.  
Summary of Key Findings  
Psychological well-being is the most critical determinant of whether employees remain engaged or withdraw  
from their work. Imbalanced psychosocial development and unmet basic psychological needs contribute  
indirectly to withdrawal through reduced well-being. Personal responsibility acts as a protective buffer,  
mitigating the negative impact of low well-being on workplace withdrawal.  
DISCUSSION  
This section discusses the study’s findings in relation to developmental psychology theories and the framework  
of workplace well-being. The discussion is linked to the Malaysian public-sector organizational context, focusing  
on implications for individual psychology, organizational culture, and human resource management.  
Psychosocial Development and Workplace Withdrawal  
The findings indicate a significant negative relationship between psychosocial development and workplace  
withdrawal. This aligns with Erikson’s (1963) theory, which emphasizes that the level of psychosocial maturity  
determines one’s stability of identity, sense of responsibility, and ability to adapt within social and work  
environments.  
In the context of public sector employees in rural districts such as Matu and Daro, many workers face socio-  
emotional challenges including limited facilities, social pressure, and work fatigue. Insufficient psychosocial  
maturity particularly in dimensions such as competence (industry vs. inferiority) and intimacy (intimacy vs.  
isolation) makes them more prone to withdrawing from organizational interactions.  
This finding supports Liu et al. (2023), who found that unstable psychosocial development reduces intrinsic  
motivation and increases avoidance behaviors. Thus, psychosocial development should be regarded as a crucial  
component in human resource development (HRD) strategies.  
Basic Psychological Needs and Well-being  
The results demonstrate that the fulfillment of basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, and  
relatedness) is positively correlated with psychological well-being and negatively correlated with withdrawal.  
This finding reinforces Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), which posits that humans function  
optimally when their three basic psychological needs are satisfied.  
When employees are given autonomy in decision-making, recognized for their competence, and experience  
supportive social relationships, they tend to be more psychologically well and less likely to disengage from their  
work.  
Conversely, rigid work environments characterized by tight control and lack of recognition lead to emotional  
exhaustion and loss of meaning in work.  
This finding is consistent with Gagné et al. (2022), who emphasized that autonomy and recognition are primary  
protective factors against employee disengagement in public organizations.  
Psychological Well-being as a Mediator  
The mediating role of psychological well-being is the most salient finding of this study. Bootstrapping analysis  
confirmed that well-being serves as a bridge linking psychosocial development to withdrawal behavior.  
When individuals experience developmental stress such as identity conflict or perceived incompetence their  
well-being declines, leading to withdrawal behavior. However, when their well-being remains stable, bolstered  
by social support and job satisfaction, the negative influence of developmental imbalance diminishes.  
Page 8119  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
This finding aligns with Seligman’s (2011) PERMA Model, which highlights five pillars of well-being: Positive  
Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment. The present study corroborates that when  
employees experience meaning and positive relationships at work, they are less likely to withdraw—even when  
facing developmental pressures.  
Personal Responsibility as a Moderator  
The study also found that personal responsibility plays a significant moderating role by weakening the negative  
effect of low well-being on withdrawal. This implies that individuals with a strong sense of responsibility tend  
to stay committed to their tasks despite suboptimal psychological states.  
This result supports Sparks (2020), who proposed that personal responsibility serves as a resilience factor in  
managing workplace stress. Such responsibility typically stems from mature moral and psychosocial  
development, where individuals internalize responsibility as part of their professional identity.  
In Malaysia’s public sector, which values ethics, integrity, and service to society, personal responsibility acts as  
a moral anchor against disengagement. Hence, cultivating responsibility values should form a key component of  
staff training and professional development programs.  
Comparison with Previous Studies  
The findings of this study are consistent with both international and local research on workplace well-being and  
withdrawal behavior.  
For example:  
Holtom et al. (2022) found that withdrawal typically begins with psychological detachment before  
escalating to absenteeism.  
Fong and Mahmud (2021) reported that job burnout among Malaysian civil servants was closely linked  
to emotional well-being and lack of recognition.  
Bakker and Demerouti (2017), through the Job Demands–Resources Model, demonstrated that imbalance  
between job demands and psychological resources reduces motivation and increases withdrawal  
behavior.  
This study expands the literature by incorporating Erikson’s psychosocial development theory into the  
organizational well-being framework, highlighting how developmental psychology processes can indirectly  
influence organizational behavior through mental well-being.  
Theoretical and Practical Implications  
a. Theoretical Implications  
This study broadens developmental psychology theory by linking it to contemporary workplace behavior. It  
demonstrates that variations in psychosocial development can explain differences in well-being and work  
engagement.  
Thus, developmental theory provides a richer lens for understanding employee motivation and disengagement  
dynamics.  
b. Practical Implications  
The findings emphasize the importance of psychologically oriented workplace interventions, particularly those  
focusing on:  
Developmental self-awareness and emotional regulation programs;  
Page 8120  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Well-being training based on the PERMA framework;  
Responsibility-building workshops integrating ethical and reflective leadership practices.  
c. Organizational Policy Implications  
Government departments are encouraged to incorporate well-being and psychosocial indicators into performance  
evaluation systems and non-financial reward mechanisms. This approach can help reduce hidden withdrawal  
and foster psychological presence the state of being mentally and emotionally engaged at work.  
Section Summary  
Overall, the findings confirm that workplace withdrawal is not merely a matter of discipline or performance but  
a psychological phenomenon rooted in well-being, responsibility, and developmental maturity. A developmental  
psychology perspective provides deeper insight into why some employees remain productive under stress, while  
others gradually disengage from their work responsibilities.  
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH  
This section summarizes the main findings of the study and presents recommendations for future research and  
practical interventions within public-sector organizations. The study emphasizes that the phenomenon of  
workplace withdrawal is not merely a consequence of organizational factors but is deeply influenced by  
individual developmental psychology processes.  
Main Conclusions  
The study concludes that psychosocial development, basic psychological needs, psychological well-being, and  
personal responsibility are the core variables determining whether employees remain engaged or withdraw from  
work.  
Key conclusions include:  
Stable psychosocial development helps individuals adapt effectively, build a strong professional identity,  
and maintain commitment to their organization.  
Fulfillment of basic psychological needs—autonomy, competence, and relatedness—enhances  
psychological well-being and intrinsic motivation.  
Psychological well-being functions as a mediator, linking internal psychological factors with external  
work behaviors such as withdrawal.  
Personal responsibility acts as a moderator, strengthening psychological resilience against stress and  
fatigue.  
The study demonstrates that interventions focusing on employee well-being and developmental balance can  
reduce workplace withdrawal, increase productivity, and enhance psychological presence—employees’ mental  
and emotional engagement in their work.  
Contributions of the Study  
a. Theoretical Contribution  
This study enriches developmental psychology theory by extending its application to modern organizational  
contexts. By integrating Erikson’s, Deci & Ryan’s, and Seligman’s theories, the study proposes a new conceptual  
model emphasizing balance between self-development and social responsibility at work.  
Page 8121  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
b. Empirical Contribution  
Through a quantitative, mediation moderation model, the study empirically validates the complex  
interrelationships among psychological variables and work behavior, offering an alternative to traditional  
performance-based measures by highlighting well-being as a non-financial performance indicator.  
c. Practical Contribution  
The study recommends that organizational leaders reframe workplace withdrawal not as a disciplinary issue, but  
as an indicator of psychological distress or developmental stagnation among employees.  
Practical Recommendations for Organizations  
Developmental Psychology-Based Training:  
Implement programs addressing key developmental stages (e.g., professional identity building, healthy work  
relationships, and emotional conflict management).  
Holistic Well-being Interventions:  
Conduct PERMA-based workshops to strengthen positive emotions, engagement, and meaning in work.  
Recognition and Work Autonomy:  
Allow employees greater decision-making autonomy and recognize contributions to enhance self-worth  
and competence.  
Annual Psychological Assessment:  
Integrate psychological well-being and personal responsibility measures into annual performance  
evaluations to detect early signs of withdrawal.  
Recommendations for Future Research  
Longitudinal Approach:  
Examine long-term changes in psychosocial development and well-being, particularly among new and  
experienced employees.  
Qualitative Exploration:  
Conduct in-depth qualitative studies (e.g., phenomenological or narrative interviews) to understand employees’  
lived experiences of withdrawal.  
Cross-Sector Comparison:  
Compare withdrawal patterns across public, private, and non-governmental sectors to identify the influence of  
organizational culture.  
Intergenerational Studies:  
Investigate differences between younger (Gen Z) and older generations in psychosocial maturity and sense of  
work responsibility.  
Page 8122  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Closing Statement  
Workplace withdrawal reflects the equilibrium between individual and environmental factors. From a  
developmental psychological perspective, employees are not merely labor resources but evolving individuals  
striving for meaning, identity, and well-being. Human resource management must therefore align its strategies  
with the complex psychological realities of employees focusing not only on discipline enforcement but also on  
fostering growth, balance, and holistic well-being. Only through a comprehensive and empathetic approach can  
organizations sustain employees who are present not just physically, but also psychologically, emotionally, and  
morally.  
REFERENCES  
1. Abdul Rahman, S., & Mahmud, M. (2021). Kesejahteraan psikologi dan komitmen organisasi dalam  
kalangan penjawat awam di Malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 35(2), 55–68.  
2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking  
forward.  
Journal  
of  
Occupational  
Health  
Psychology,  
22(3),  
273–285.  
3. Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing.  
International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526  
4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-  
determination  
5. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.  
of  
behavior.  
Psychological  
Inquiry,  
11(4),  
227–268.  
6. Fong, C. S., & Mahmud, M. (2021). Hubungan antara kelesuan kerja dan kesejahteraan emosi dalam  
kalangan penjawat awam Malaysia. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 19(1), 21–34.  
7. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination at work: Motivation  
and well-being in the workplace revisited. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and  
Organizational Behavior, 9, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091136  
8. Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1991). General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation  
of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-  
9. Holtom, B. C., Burton, J. P., & Crossley, C. D. (2022). How to prevent employee withdrawal behaviors:  
Evidence from  
a
longitudinal study. Human Resource Management, 61(2), 241–258.  
10. Liu, Y., Chen, C., & Zhang, J. (2023). Psychosocial development, work engagement, and withdrawal  
behavior among healthcare workers in China. International Journal of Occupational Psychology, 12(4),  
11. Mahdi, A. K. (2025). Hubungan kemurungan, kebimbangan, stres dan kelesuan terhadap kesihatan  
mental dalam kalangan kakitangan di fasiliti kesihatan Matu dan Daro, Sarawak. Doctor of Philosophy  
Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.  
12. Schaefer, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2020). Positive psychology in the workplace: A new approach to  
employee engagement and well-being. Annual Review of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 45–67.  
13. Schaie, K. W. (2019). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study  
(3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.  
14. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free  
Press.  
15. Sparks, J. (2020). The personal responsibility scale: Measuring accountability and integrity in the  
workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(8), 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000462  
16. World Health Organization. (2023). Mental health and work: Policy brief. Geneva: WHO Press.  
Page 8123