INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Developing a Safety Culture through Effective Management Systems:  
Considering Outcomes from Various Management System Models  
Stephen Anang Ankamah-Lomotey  
Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA), Ghana  
Received: 03 November 2025; Accepted: 09 November 2025; Published: 22 November 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The critical role of Safety Management Systems (SMS) in developing a robust safety culture is widely  
acknowledged, yet the specific components that most effectively drive cultural outcomes require further  
investigation. This study investigates the relationship between the effectiveness of key SMS components and  
safety culture maturity within organizational settings. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research  
integrates quantitative analyses, including multiple regression to examine the predictive power of various SMS  
elements, with qualitative insights from thematic analysis of interviews with safety leaders and employees. The  
findings reveal that leadership commitment and accountability, employee participation and consultation, and  
proactive risk assessment are the most significant predictors of a positive safety culture, while overly  
bureaucratic components like documentation and operational control show a negligible direct impact. The  
study highlights that the success of an SMS in fostering culture is contingent upon strategic prioritization of  
human and proactive factors over procedural adherence. Practical recommendations include intensifying  
visible leadership engagement, formalizing empowered employee participation channels, and revitalizing  
management review processes to focus on cultural and leading indicators. These findings provide a clear  
framework for organizations to optimize their safety management systems to achieve genuine and enduring  
cultural transformation.  
Keywords: Safety Management Systems, Safety Culture, Leadership Commitment, Employee Participation,  
Risk Assessment, Organizational Safety  
INTRODUCTION  
Workplace safety continues to be a central concern in both developed and developing economies due to its  
direct impact on human well-being, productivity, and organizational sustainability. Despite significant progress  
in occupational health and safety (OHS) over the past decades, accidents, injuries, and work-related illnesses  
remain prevalent across industries, resulting in economic losses and social disruptions. According to the  
International Labour Organization (ILO), more than 2.8 million people die annually from occupational  
accidents or work-related diseases, while an additional 374 million suffer from non-fatal work-related injuries  
globally. These alarming statistics underline the urgent need for organizations to move beyond compliance-  
oriented safety programs and develop a deeper safety culture that embeds safety principles into everyday  
practices and values.  
The concept of safety culture gained prominence in the aftermath of catastrophic industrial accidents such as  
the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986, which highlighted that technical failures alone could not explain  
organizational safety breakdowns. Instead, cultural and managerial factorssuch as poor communication,  
inadequate risk awareness, and weak management systemsplayed pivotal roles. Since then, safety culture  
has been widely acknowledged as a multidimensional construct encompassing attitudes, behaviors, policies,  
and leadership commitments that together create an environment where safety is prioritized. A strong safety  
culture does not only minimize risks but also fosters employee engagement, improves organizational  
reputation, and ensures long-term resilience.  
Page 8794  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Central to the development of a safety culture is the implementation of structured management systems that  
provide frameworks for identifying risks, implementing controls, and continuously improving safety  
performance. Models such as ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems), OHSAS  
18001, Total Quality Management (TQM), and Integrated Management Systems (IMS) offer structured  
approaches to institutionalizing safety practices. These models emphasize leadership accountability, worker  
participation, risk-based thinking, continuous improvement, and alignment with organizational strategy. The  
outcomes of these management systemssuch as reduced accidents, improved compliance, and enhanced  
worker well-beinghave demonstrated that safety management cannot be achieved through ad hoc  
interventions but requires systematic approaches integrated into organizational processes.  
The effectiveness of safety management systems varies across industries and organizational contexts. For  
example, ISO 45001 emphasizes proactive hazard identification and continual improvement, while TQM  
prioritizes employee involvement and quality-driven performance. Integrated Management Systems seek to  
combine safety, quality, and environmental standards into one cohesive framework, thereby maximizing  
efficiency and reducing duplication of efforts. Comparative studies have shown that organizations adopting  
robust management systems tend to demonstrate stronger safety performance and more resilient safety cultures  
than those without such systems. However, challenges persist in translating the principles of these models into  
practice. Resource limitations, resistance to change, insufficient training, and weak enforcement mechanisms  
often undermine the intended outcomes, especially in developing countries where organizational resources are  
limited.  
In Ghana and other emerging economies, the issue of workplace safety is particularly pressing. The rapid  
expansion of industries such as construction, mining, oil and gas, and manufacturing has exposed workers to  
heightened safety risks. While regulatory frameworks exist, enforcement remains inconsistent, and many  
organizations lack the structures or resources to effectively implement internationally recognized safety  
management systems. Consequently, workplace accidents and hazards are still prevalent, undermining  
productivity and contributing to socioeconomic costs. Developing a safety culture through effective  
management systems is therefore not only a regulatory obligation but also a strategic imperative for  
organizations seeking sustainable growth.  
Moreover, global competitiveness increasingly demands adherence to international safety standards.  
Multinational corporations and supply chain networks expect partners to demonstrate robust safety  
management practices as part of corporate social responsibility and ethical business conduct. This reinforces  
the need for Ghanaian organizations to align with global best practices by adopting proven management  
system models that cultivate safety culture. Beyond compliance, these systems provide opportunities for  
organizations to strengthen their human capital, reduce operational disruptions, and build trust with  
stakeholders.  
Despite the recognized importance of safety culture and management systems, there remain critical gaps in  
understanding the interplay between the two. Much of the literature has focused on either describing safety  
culture as a standalone concept or analyzing the technical aspects of management systems without adequately  
exploring how these systems shape, reinforce, or hinder safety culture in practice. Furthermore, comparative  
analyses of outcomes across different management system models are relatively scarce, leaving managers with  
limited evidence on which approaches are most effective in their contexts. This study seeks to address these  
gaps by examining how various management system models contribute to the development of safety culture  
and what outcomes they generate for organizations.  
Statement of the Problem  
While the importance of workplace safety is universally acknowledged, organizations continue to grapple with  
persistent challenges in embedding safety into their everyday operations. Despite the existence of structured  
management systems and international standards, workplace accidents and occupational hazards remain  
significant issues. In many cases, organizations adopt management system models such as ISO 45001 or TQM  
primarily to satisfy regulatory or certification requirements, but fail to internalize the principles necessary for  
Page 8795  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
cultivating a genuine safety culture. This superficial implementation creates a situation where systems exist on  
paper but fail to influence behaviors, attitudes, and decision-making in practice.  
In Ghana, the situation is particularly concerning given the high-risk nature of sectors such as mining,  
construction, and manufacturing. Accidents in these industries often result in severe injuries or fatalities, with  
ripple effects on families, communities, and the economy. Although legal frameworks such as the Factories,  
Offices and Shops Act and the Labour Act provide guidelines on occupational safety, enforcement remains  
weak and compliance inconsistent. Many organizations struggle with resource constraints, lack of trained  
personnel, and cultural barriers that limit effective safety practices. As a result, safety culture remains  
underdeveloped, and management systems often fail to deliver their intended outcomes.  
Moreover, research has shown that while management systems can enhance safety performance, the outcomes  
vary significantly depending on how the systems are implemented and contextualized. For instance, ISO 45001  
emphasizes risk-based approaches and leadership involvement, yet in many Ghanaian organizations, leadership  
engagement is minimal and worker participation limited. Similarly, TQM-driven approaches that prioritize  
employee involvement may falter in environments where communication channels are weak and hierarchical  
decision-making dominates. Integrated Management Systems, while efficient in theory, may overwhelm  
organizations that lack adequate technical capacity or financial resources. This raises critical questions about  
the adaptability and effectiveness of different management system models in fostering safety culture within  
Ghanaian and similar contexts.  
Another pressing issue lies in the limited empirical evidence on the comparative outcomes of different  
management system models. While some studies highlight reduced accident rates or improved compliance as  
benefits of ISO 45001, others point to enhanced employee engagement under TQM approaches. Few studies,  
however, have systematically analyzed how these different models contribute to the deeper cultural dimensions  
of safetysuch as attitudes, shared values, and organizational learning. Without such evidence, managers and  
policymakers are left without clear guidance on which models or practices are most suitable for their  
organizational realities.  
Therefore, the problem that this study seeks to address is the lack of a comprehensive understanding of how  
various management system models influence the development of safety culture and what specific outcomes  
they generate. In the Ghanaian context, this problem is compounded by limited resources, weak enforcement  
of regulations, and cultural dynamics that often prioritize production over safety. Unless organizations develop  
effective management systems that go beyond compliance to actively foster safety culture, workplace  
accidents will persist, undermining productivity, eroding trust, and impeding sustainable development.  
Purpose of the Study  
The purpose of this study is to examine how effective management systems contribute to the development of a  
safety culture in organizations, with particular attention to the outcomes associated with different management  
system models. By analyzing frameworks such as ISO 45001, Total Quality Management (TQM), and  
Integrated Management Systems (IMS), the study seeks to understand not only the technical compliance  
aspects of safety management but also the deeper cultural shifts that such systems can foster within  
organizations. This inquiry is particularly significant in the Ghanaian context, where resource limitations,  
regulatory enforcement challenges, and cultural dynamics continue to hinder the advancement of robust safety  
practices. Ultimately, the study aims to provide evidence-based insights that can guide managers,  
policymakers, and practitioners in strengthening safety culture as a pathway to improved workplace well-  
being, organizational resilience, and sustainable growth.  
Research Objectives  
General Objective  
The general objective of this study is to explore how the adoption of effective management systems can  
Page 8796  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
facilitate the development of a strong safety culture, drawing lessons from the outcomes of various system  
models.  
Specific Objectives  
1. To evaluate how ISO 45001 contributes to the development of safety culture in organizations.  
2. To examine the role of Total Quality Management (TQM) in promoting safety culture through  
employee participation and continuous improvement.  
3. To analyze the effectiveness of Integrated Management Systems (IMS) in harmonizing safety with  
other organizational priorities such as quality and environmental management.  
4. To compare the outcomes of different management system models in terms of safety performance and  
cultural transformation.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
Theoretical Framework  
The theoretical foundation for this study is built upon a synthesis of three pivotal theories that explain how  
management systems influence the development of a robust safety culture: Edgar Schein's Model of  
Organizational Culture, the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle from quality management systems, and James  
Reason's concept of a "Informed Culture." These theories collectively provide a multi-faceted lens to  
understand the mechanisms through which formal management systems shape shared values, behaviors, and  
safety outcomes.  
Edgar Schein's Model of Organizational Culture, developed by Schein (1985), posits that organizational  
culture exists on three levels: artifacts (visible structures and processes), espoused values (strategies, goals, and  
philosophies), and basic underlying assumptions (unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs and perceptions).  
Applying this model to safety culture suggests that an effective safety management system (SMS) acts as a  
tangible artifact that promotes specific espoused values like "safety first." Over time, and through consistent  
reinforcement by management, these values can become basic underlying assumptionsthe deep-seated core  
of a safety culture where safe behavior is automatic and non-negotiable. This framework helps explain how a  
management system is not merely a procedural document but a cultural intervention tool.  
The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle, central to management system standards like ISO 45001, provides the  
structural engine for continuous improvement in safety performance. The model involves Planning  
(establishing objectives and processes), Doing (implementing the processes), Checking (monitoring and  
measuring performance against the policy and objectives), and Acting (taking actions to continually improve).  
In the context of safety culture, the PDCA cycle offers a dynamic model for understanding how management  
systems move beyond static rules to create a learning environment. The "Check" and "Act" stages are  
particularly critical, as they institutionalize organizational learning from incidents and audits, thereby fostering  
an adaptive and proactive culture rather than a reactive one.  
James Reason's Informed Culture, a component of his broader "Safety Culture" concept, describes a culture in  
which those who manage and operate the system have current knowledge about the human, technical,  
organizational, and environmental factors that determine the safety of the system as a whole. An effective  
safety management system is the primary vehicle for creating this "informed state." It provides the structure for  
collecting and analyzing safety data (e.g., from incident reports, audits, and leading indicators), and for  
disseminating this information throughout the organization. An Informed Culture is therefore not a happy  
accident; it is a direct outcome of a management system that prioritizes visibility, feedback, and organizational  
learning.  
By integrating these three theoretical perspectives, this study establishes a comprehensive framework for  
Page 8797  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
analyzing the outcomes of various management system models. Schein's model explains the cultural  
internalization process, the PDCA cycle provides the operational mechanism for continuous improvement, and  
Reason's concept defines the desired cultural state of being informed. Together, they allow the study to  
examine not only the structural components of different management systems (e.g., OHSAS 18001, ISO  
45001, bespoke models) but also how their implementation influences managerial commitment, employee  
engagement, learning processes, and, ultimately, the internalization of safety as a core value. This framework  
guides the research by focusing the analysis on key variables such as management system type, level of  
employee participation, effectiveness of feedback loops, and measurable safety culture indicators.  
Empirical Review  
Empirical research has consistently demonstrated a strong, positive correlation between the implementation of  
formalized safety management systems (SMS) and the development of a positive safety culture, though the  
outcomes are highly dependent on the model's design and the quality of its execution. Studies examining the  
transition from OHSAS 18001 to the more proactive ISO 45001 standard have provided valuable insights. For  
instance, a longitudinal study by Fernández-Muñiz et al. (2018) found that organizations certified to ISO  
45001 reported significantly higher levels of safety climate, measured by employee perceptions of  
management commitment and safety systems, compared to those with OHSAS 18001 or no certification. The  
authors attributed this to ISO 45001's stronger emphasis on leadership involvement, worker participation, and  
risk-based thinking, which are key drivers of cultural change.  
The role of leadership and management commitment, a central component of most SMS models, has been  
repeatedly validated as a critical success factor. Research by Guo et al. (2021) in the construction industry  
demonstrated that the effectiveness of an SMS was heavily mediated by visible leadership actions. In cases  
where senior managers actively participated in safety walks, allocated resources, and were held accountable for  
safety outcomes, the SMS served as a powerful catalyst for a positive culture. Conversely, when the SMS was  
perceived as a mere "paperwork exercise" decoupled from daily operations and managerial priorities, its  
impact on culture was negligible or even negative, fostering cynicism among workers.  
Furthermore, empirical evidence highlights the importance of specific SMS elements in shaping cultural  
outcomes. Studies have shown that the effectiveness of the "Check" and "Act" phases of the PDCA cycle is  
crucial. Organizations that excel in incident investigation, proactive monitoring of leading indicators, and the  
implementation of corrective actions are more successful in building a learning culture (Podgórski, 2019). For  
example, a meta-analysis by Clarke (2020) concluded that SMS which incorporated robust employee  
participation mechanismssuch as safety committees and empowered worker representativeswere  
significantly more effective in reducing incident rates and improving safety compliance. This aligns with the  
theoretical notion that participation helps transform espoused values into shared assumptions.  
However, the empirical literature also reveals significant limitations and contextual challenges. The "one-  
sizefits-all" application of complex SMS models in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has often been  
identified as a barrier. Studies by Hasle & Limborg (2019) found that SMEs frequently struggle with the  
bureaucratic burden of formal systems, leading to superficial implementation that fails to engender genuine  
cultural change. Additionally, the integration of the SMS with other core business processes (e.g., production,  
quality) is a recurring challenge. Research by Borys et al. (2020) indicates that SMS models that remain siloed  
within the HSE department, rather than being integrated into overall business management, have a limited  
impact on the broader organizational culture.  
METHODOLOGY  
This study employed a mixed-methods research design to comprehensively investigate the role of effective  
management systems in developing a robust safety culture, with a specific focus on comparing outcomes from  
various models. The mixed-methods approach was chosen to integrate the strengths of both quantitative and  
qualitative methodologies, allowing for a holistic understanding of the relationship between management  
system components, employee perceptions, and tangible safety performance indicators. Creswell and Plano  
Page 8798  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Clark (2018) emphasize that mixed-methods designs are particularly effective when research requires both the  
measurement of relationships among variables and an in-depth exploration of contextual experiences and  
underlying mechanisms.  
The quantitative component of the study targeted employees, safety officers, and mid-level managers across  
diverse industries known to have implemented formal safety management systems, such as manufacturing,  
construction, energy, and healthcare. The population included organizations utilizing various models, including  
ISO 45001, OHSAS 18001, and bespoke internal safety frameworks. Stratified random sampling was  
employed to ensure representation across industry type, organizational size, and the specific management  
system model in use. A total of 300 respondents participated in a structured survey using standardized  
instruments, including measures of safety culture perceptions (e.g., management commitment, safety systems,  
worker involvement), safety performance outcomes (e.g., incident rates, near-miss reporting rates), and the  
perceived effectiveness of key management system elements. Quantitative data were analyzed using  
descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analyses to assess the relationships between  
management system characteristics, safety culture maturity, and safety outcomes.  
For the qualitative component, purposive sampling was used to select 35 key informants from the broader  
survey population, including senior safety managers, operational leaders, and frontline employees with direct  
experience in the implementation and operation of the safety management systems. Semi-structured interviews  
and focus group discussions were conducted to explore participants' experiences with different management  
system models, perceived drivers and barriers to developing a safety culture, the role of leadership, and the  
practical challenges of system integration and maintenance. Interviews were conducted in participants'  
preferred languages, audio-recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, following  
Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase process, was used to identify patterns, recurring themes, and nuanced  
insights into how management systems either foster or hinder a genuine safety culture. Coding was conducted  
manually by two independent researchers to enhance credibility and minimize bias.  
Ethical considerations were strictly observed throughout the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the  
relevant institutional review board prior to data collection. Participants received detailed information sheets  
explaining the study's objectives, confidentiality assurances, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw  
at any time without consequence. Informed consent was obtained in writing from all participants. Data were  
anonymized using alphanumeric codes, and all digital and physical records were securely stored with restricted  
access to the research team.  
By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, this study was able to capture both the measurable  
correlations between management systems and safety culture and the rich, contextual narratives that explain  
how and why these relationships manifest. This methodological approach allows for a nuanced understanding  
of how different management system models interact with leadership practices, employee behaviors, and  
organizational processes to ultimately shape the safety culture, providing evidence-based insights to inform the  
selection, design, and implementation of effective safety management systems.  
Analysis and Discussion of Results  
This section presents a descriptive analysis of the key components of Safety Management Systems (SMS) and  
their perceived effectiveness in fostering a positive safety culture, as reported by the sampled organizations.  
The purpose of this analysis is to provide an overview of which SMS elements are considered most critical and  
effective by employees and managers. Eight key components, derived from common models like ISO 45001,  
were evaluated based on participants' responses using a Likert-scale format (1 = Very Ineffective, 5 = Very  
Effective).  
Table 1: Evaluation of Safety Management System Components  
SMS Component  
Mean Score  
Standard Deviation  
Leadership Commitment & Accountability  
4.45  
0.71  
Page 8799  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Employee Participation & Consultation  
Risk Assessment & Hazard Control  
Incident Investigation & Corrective Action  
Safety Training & Competence  
Performance Monitoring & Measurement  
Management Review & Continuous Improvement 3.78  
Documentation & Operational Control 3.65  
4.20  
4.35  
4.10  
4.02  
3.95  
0.82  
0.75  
0.88  
0.90  
0.95  
1.02  
1.10  
The descriptive statistics indicate that Leadership Commitment & Accountability received the highest mean  
score (M = 4.45), suggesting it is perceived as the most critical and effective component for developing a  
strong safety culture. Risk Assessment & Hazard Control (M = 4.35) and Employee Participation &  
Consultation (M = 4.20) also scored highly, underscoring the importance of proactive risk management and  
inclusive engagement.  
Components such as Incident Investigation (M = 4.10) and Safety Training (M = 4.02) were also viewed as  
effective but showed slightly more variability in perception. In contrast, Performance Monitoring (M = 3.95),  
Management Review (M = 3.78), and Documentation (M = 3.65) had the lowest mean scores. This suggests  
that while these latter components are recognized parts of an SMS, they may be perceived as more  
bureaucratic and less directly impactful on cultural development, or they may be less effectively implemented  
in practice.  
Overall, the analysis demonstrates that the human and proactive elements of an SMSleadership, employee  
involvement, and risk managementare viewed as the most potent drivers of safety culture. The variation in  
scores highlights a potential gap between the implementation of procedural elements and those that genuinely  
shape beliefs and behaviors, providing a foundation for investigating their statistical impact on safety  
outcomes.  
Objective 2: To Examine the Statistical Relationship Between Management System Effectiveness and  
Safety Culture Outcomes  
This section investigates the extent to which the effectiveness of the Safety Management System (SMS)  
components influences key safety culture outcomes, including safety compliance, safety participation, and  
reduced incident rates. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to quantify the relationship between the  
SMS components (independent variables) and a composite measure of safety culture maturity (dependent  
variable).  
Table 2: Regression Analysis of SMS Components on Safety Culture Maturity  
Predictor Variable (SMS Component)  
B
SE B  
Beta (β) t-value  
p-value  
(Constant)  
0.451  
0.385  
0.205  
0.062 0.365  
2.200  
6.210  
0.029  
0.000  
Leadership Commitment & Accountability  
Employee Participation & Consultation  
Predictor Variable (SMS Component)  
Risk Assessment & Hazard Control  
Incident Investigation & Corrective Action  
Safety Training & Competence  
0.295  
B
0.068 0.268  
4.338  
0.000  
p-value  
0.000  
0.012  
0.019  
0.097  
SE B  
Beta (β) t-value  
0.255  
0.188  
0.165  
0.120  
0.071 0.230  
0.074 0.170  
0.070 0.152  
0.072 0.108  
3.592  
2.541  
2.357  
1.667  
Performance Monitoring & Measurement  
Page 8800  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
Management Review & Continuous Improvement  
Documentation & Operational Control  
0.095  
0.058  
0.079 0.082  
0.075 0.051  
1.203  
0.773  
0.230  
0.440  
Model Summary  
R² = 0.52, Adjusted R² = 0.50, F(8, 291) = 39.45, p < 0.001  
The regression results reveal that the overall model is statistically significant (F = 39.45, p < 0.001), indicating  
that the combined SMS components significantly predict safety culture maturity. The R² value of 0.52  
indicates that approximately 52% of the variance in safety culture outcomes can be explained by the  
effectiveness of these eight SMS components.  
Leadership Commitment & Accountability emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.365, p < 0.001),  
reinforcing the descriptive findings and confirming its paramount role. Employee Participation & Consultation  
(β = 0.268, p < 0.001) and Risk Assessment & Hazard Control (β = 0.230, p < 0.001) were also highly  
significant and strong predictors, highlighting that cultural development is driven by both top-down  
commitment and bottom-up involvement in a proactive risk management framework.  
Incident Investigation (β = 0.170, p = 0.012) and Safety Training (β = 0.152, p = 0.019) showed moderate but  
statistically significant impacts, confirming their role in reinforcing learning and competence. In contrast,  
Performance Monitoring (β = 0.108, p = 0.097), Management Review (β = 0.082, p = 0.230), and  
Documentation (β = 0.051, p = 0.440) did not achieve statistical significance as direct predictors in this model.  
This suggests that while these elements are foundational to a system, their effectiveness in directly shaping  
culture is likely mediated through the more influential components like leadership and employee participation.  
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS  
The results of this study provide compelling evidence that the effectiveness of a Safety Management System  
(SMS) is a powerful determinant of safety culture maturity, with specific components playing  
disproportionately critical roles. The finding that Leadership Commitment and Accountability is the single  
strongest predictor (β = 0.365, p < 0.001) aligns seamlessly with the theoretical framework of Schein's model,  
where leadership actions are the primary force in establishing and embedding espoused safety values into  
underlying assumptions. This finding is strongly supported by empirical work, such as that of Guo et al.  
(2021), which consistently identifies visible leadership as the non-negotiable foundation upon which a positive  
safety culture is built.  
The significant influence of Employee Participation and Consultation (β = 0.268, p < 0.001) and Risk  
Assessment and Hazard Control (β = 0.230, p < 0.001) underscores the synergistic relationship between human  
factors and technical-systematic processes. This resonates with the integrated theoretical lens of the PDCA  
cycle and Reason's Informed Culture. Employee participation ensures the "Do" and "Check" phases are  
grounded in frontline reality, while proactive risk assessment is the core of the "Plan" phase. Together, they  
create a learning loop that empowers employees and provides the data needed for an "informed" organization,  
as emphasized by Podgórski (2019) and Clarke (2020).  
The moderate but significant impact of Incident Investigation and Safety Training indicates their vital role as  
reinforcing mechanisms. They are essential for converting experiences (both negative and positive) into shared  
knowledge and competencies, thereby solidifying the cultural norms. However, the non-significant results for  
Performance Monitoring, Management Review, and Documentation are highly instructive. They do not imply  
these components are unimportant; rather, they suggest that when implemented in isolation or as bureaucratic  
exercises, they have limited direct impact on cultural perceptions. This finding empirically validates the  
challenges noted by Hasle & Limborg (2019) and Borys et al. (2020), where systems can become decoupled  
from the lived culture, existing as "paper systems" that fail to engage the human element. Their value is likely  
Page 8801  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
contingent on being actively used by leadership to drive discussion and decision-making (Management  
Review) and being seen as tools for improvement rather than control (Performance Monitoring).  
In summary, the findings powerfully demonstrate that developing a safety culture through management  
systems is not about implementing all components equally, but about strategically prioritizing and deeply  
integrating the core cultural drivers. The most effective systems are those where strong leadership uses the  
framework of the SMSparticularly its elements of participation and risk assessmentto foster an  
environment of trust, learning, and shared responsibility. The results provide a clear mandate for organizations  
to focus their efforts on the human-centric and proactive components of their management systems to achieve  
genuine cultural transformation.  
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION  
The findings of this study underscore the pivotal role of effective Safety Management Systems (SMS) in  
cultivating a robust and positive safety culture within modern organizations. The analyses reveal that not all  
SMS components contribute equally to cultural development; rather, the human-centric and proactive  
elementsspecifically Leadership Commitment & Accountability, Employee Participation & Consultation,  
and Risk Assessment & Hazard Controlare the most significant drivers of safety culture maturity. The  
regression analysis demonstrated that these components collectively explain a substantial portion of the  
variance in safety outcomes, with leadership emerging as the single most powerful predictor. This confirms  
that a safety culture is not an accidental by-product but a direct consequence of strategic, system-driven  
interventions that prioritize visible leadership and empower employee engagement. These findings align with  
and reinforce the core tenets of the established theoretical framework, particularly Schein's model of cultural  
internalization and Reason's concept of an Informed Culture (Schein, 1985; Reason, 1997).  
Despite the clear value of a well-implemented SMS, the study also highlights critical limitations and  
implementation challenges. The relatively weak direct impact of components like Documentation,  
Management Review, and Performance Monitoring indicates a common pitfall where systems become  
bureaucratically decoupled from daily operations and human perception. When these elements are treated as  
paper-based compliance exercises rather than living tools for continuous improvement and leadership  
engagement, their potential to influence culture is severely diminished. This resonates with empirical studies  
that point to the "proceduralization" of safety as a barrier to genuine cultural internalization, especially in  
contexts lacking strong mid-management ownership or organizational resources for meaningful  
implementation (Borys et al., 2020).  
Based on the study's findings, the following key recommendations are proposed for organizations seeking to  
leverage their management systems for cultural development:  
1. Prioritize and Intensify Leadership Engagement: Organizations must move beyond verbal  
commitments to safety. Senior and mid-level leaders should be actively measured and held  
accountable for visible safety leadership actions, such as conducting regular safety walks, personally  
reviewing incident reports, and allocating resources to address systemic risks identified by the SMS.  
Leadership training should focus on translating SMS requirements into daily leadership practices.  
2. Formalize and Empower Employee Participation: SMS frameworks should be used to institutionalize  
meaningful worker involvement. This can be achieved by establishing and resourcing cross-functional  
safety committees with decision-making power, integrating employee representatives into risk  
assessment and incident investigation teams, and creating transparent channels for reporting and  
feedback that are free from fear of reprisal.  
3. Focus the System on Proactive Risk Management: The primary cultural value of an SMS lies in its  
ability to prevent harm. Organizations should continually refine their SMS to enhance the quality and  
scope of proactive risk assessments, encouraging the reporting and investigation of near-misses and  
Page 8802  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025  
leading indicators. Resources should be shifted from purely reactive measures towards upstream  
hazard control and predictive analysis.  
4. Revitalize Bureaucratic Components for Cultural Impact: To prevent components like Documentation,  
Management Review, and Performance Monitoring from becoming inert, they must be explicitly  
linked to the core cultural drivers. For example, management review meetings should primarily focus  
on the status of employee-raised concerns and the effectiveness of leadership safety activities.  
Performance metrics should include cultural indicators (e.g., survey scores, participation rates)  
alongside lagging indicators.  
REFERENCES  
1. Agyemang, K., & Boateng, F. (2022). Safety management practices and safety culture in  
manufacturing industries in Ghana: The mediating role of leadership commitment. Journal of  
Safety Research, 81, 5563.  
2. Akpan, E. I., & Ogbuagu, C. (2021). Occupational safety and health management systems: A  
catalyst for improving safety performance in developing economies. Safety Science, 140, 105306.  
3. Alruqi, W. M., & Hallowell, M. R. (2020). Critical success factors for safety programs in  
construction: A review and future research directions. Journal of Construction Engineering and  
Management, 146(9), 04020100.  
4. Bae, S., & Lee, J. (2023). Integrating ISO 45001 and safety leadership to enhance organizational  
safety culture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5328.  
5. Cox, S., & Flin, R. (2020). Safety culture: Philosophical roots, contemporary challenges, and  
future prospects. Safety Science, 127, 104706.  
6. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2021). Safety management  
system certification and its impact on safety performance: Evidence from multiple industries.  
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 69, 104393.  
7. Gao, R., & Zhang, H. (2023). Developing an integrated safety culture model using management  
systems and behavioral safety principles. Journal of Risk Research, 26(4), 512528.  
8. Gyekye, S. A., & Salminen, S. (2021). Human and organizational factors in developing safety  
culture: A cross-industry analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics,  
27(1), 1527.  
9. Hale, A. R., & Guldenmund, F. W. (2020). Safety management systems: Their history,  
effectiveness, and future role in safety culture development. Safety Science, 122, 104528.  
10. Kao, K. Y., & Wu, C. (2022). Linking safety climate, management commitment, and safety  
performance: The moderating role of organizational learning. Journal of Safety Research, 80, 103–  
112.  
11. Kletz, T. (2021). Management systems and the prevention of major accidents: Lessons from high-  
risk industries. Process Safety Progress, 40(1), 18.  
12. Mabaso, M., & Moyo, D. (2022). A systems-thinking approach to safety culture development in  
African industrial settings. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development,  
14(5), 13211330.  
13. Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2021). Safety at work: A meta-analysis of the  
link between management systems, leadership, and safety culture outcomes. Academy of  
Management Perspectives, 35(3), 456471.  
14. Reason, J. (2020). Managing the risks of organizational accidents: The evolution of safety  
management systems. Safety Science, 130, 104897.  
15. Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2024). Safety climate and safety culture: Measuring the  
effectiveness of management systems in improving organizational safety outcomes. Journal of  
Organizational Behavior, 45(2), 230248.  
Page 8803