INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 880
www.rsisinternational.org
Progressivism in Context: A Critical Psychological Examination of
John Dewey’s Educational Theory in African Schooling Systems with
a Case Study of Zimbabwe
Henry Wasosa, Isaac Mutelo
Catholic University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000076
Received: 29 September 2025; Accepted: 04 October 2025; Published: 04 November 2025
ABSTRACT
John Dewey’s progressivist educational philosophy, grounded in inquiry, experiential learning, and democratic
classrooms, has informed numerous African curriculum reforms. This paper critically examines the
psychological viability of Deweyan progressivism in sub-Saharan African contexts, focusing on Zimbabwe as a
case study. Empirical evidence indicates that learner-centred, inquiry-based approaches have the potential to
enhance engagement, higher-order thinking, and democratic dispositions. However, gaps in foundational skills
(literacy, numeracy), language complexities, teacher capacity, and misaligned assessments frequently hinder the
realisation of these ideals. Recommendations include adopting hybrid pedagogical models, sustained teacher
professional development, assessment redesign, and sequenced policy implementation.
Keywords: progressivism, Zimbabwe, educational psychology, policy implementation
INTRODUCTION
John Dewey’s seminal work Democracy and Education (1916) argued that education should foster experiential
growth, reflection, and social interaction rather than merely transmit fixed knowledge. Across Africa, Deweyan
principles have influenced curriculum reforms, particularly under competency-based curricula (CBC)
frameworks. Despite policy enthusiasm, the cognitive and psychological demands of learner-centred pedagogy
(LCP), including prior knowledge, working memory, language comprehension, and scaffolding, are often under-
recognised in practice.
This study addresses three key questions:
1. What psychological strengths and limitations accompany the adoption of Deweyan progressivism in
African schooling systems?
2. How has Zimbabwe implemented progressivist reforms, and what empirical outcomes, both successes
and challenges, have emerged?
3. What pedagogical, curricular, and policy adaptations can optimize the psychological fit and effectiveness
of progressive educational reforms in resource-constrained African contexts?
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
1. Deweyan Progressivism and Constructivism
Deweyan progressivism emphasises that education should prepare individuals for meaningful participation in
democratic life by focusing on inquiry, collaboration, and learning through experience (Dewey, 1916). The
philosophy promotes a shift away from rote memorisation and passive learning, arguing that knowledge should
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 881
www.rsisinternational.org
be actively constructed by learners through engagement with real-world contexts. Constructivist theory builds
on these ideas by emphasising that learners interpret new information in light of prior knowledge, which shapes
how they organise and retain learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). Both perspectives prioritise student
agency, suggesting that learners develop a deeper understanding when they can explore, question, and apply
concepts in authentic ways. The teacher in this framework becomes a facilitator, guiding students while allowing
them freedom to explore ideas independently and collaboratively. Classroom practices, therefore, include hands-
on projects, problem-solving tasks, and interactive discussions that mirror real-life decision-making. This vision
positions the classroom as a living laboratory for intellectual growth and democratic participation.
Central to Dewey’s progressivism is the concept of “learning by doing,” which asserts that learners understand
concepts more deeply when they can act on them in practical ways (Dewey, 1916). For instance, conducting
experiments in science, simulating economic transactions in business studies, or engaging in role-play in social
studies can transform abstract concepts into meaningful, memorable experiences. Constructivist research
confirms this by showing that students develop stronger mental models when they actively interact with content
rather than passively receive information (Bransford et al., 2000). These practices also reinforce metacognitive
awareness, as learners reflect on their approaches and adjust strategies accordingly. In turn, students learn to
view mistakes not as failures but as opportunities for growth, which cultivates resilience and adaptive thinking.
Teachers, therefore, play a critical role in scaffolding these experiences, ensuring that students are supported as
they navigate complex concepts. This cycle of action, reflection, and adjustment is at the heart of progressivist
and constructivist learning.
Another important element of Deweyan progressivism is its democratic ethos, which frames the classroom as a
microcosm of society where students practice skills of dialogue, negotiation, and shared responsibility (Dewey,
1916). Constructivist principles support this by emphasising the role of social interaction in learning,
highlighting that collaboration enables learners to co-construct meaning and gain multiple perspectives
(Bransford et al., 2000). Group projects, cooperative problem-solving, and peer feedback exercises embody these
ideas by creating contexts where students learn from one another. Such practices not only enhance academic
achievement but also build social competencies such as empathy, communication, and cultural awareness. By
fostering inclusive and participatory learning environments, teachers help students see knowledge as a shared
resource rather than a private possession. This prepares learners for active roles in democratic societies where
dialogue and cooperation are crucial. In this sense, education becomes simultaneously intellectual, moral, and
social.
While Deweyan and constructivist approaches are influential, they are not without critique, as some argue that
overly unstructured inquiry may lead to superficial understanding if learners are left without sufficient guidance
(Dewey, 1916). Similarly, constructivist classrooms can be challenging to implement in large or under-resourced
settings, where individualised attention and scaffolding are difficult to provide. Standardised testing systems
also pose barriers, as they prioritise memorisation and uniformity over exploration and critical thinking.
Nevertheless, empirical evidence suggests that when implemented effectively, progressivist and constructivist
practices foster deeper comprehension, creativity, and problem-solving skills (Bransford et al., 2000). The
challenge lies in balancing freedom with structure, ensuring that learners have both autonomy and support.
Teachers who integrate explicit instruction with inquiry-based tasks often achieve the most successful outcomes.
Such a balance allows these theories to remain practical as well as philosophically appealing.
Deweyan progressivism and constructivism provide a foundational framework for learner-centred education that
emphasises agency, experience, and collaboration. They challenge teacher-centred models by shifting the focus
toward active, participatory learning that connects with students’ real lives. Their emphasis on democratic
practice and social interaction highlights the interconnected cognitive, social, and ethical purposes of education.
While challenges of implementation exist, these theories remain highly influential in shaping progressive
curriculum and pedagogy. Importantly, their integration with psychological frameworks such as cognitive load
theory and self-determination theory enhances their applicability in modern classrooms. By situating these
philosophies within a broader evidence-based framework, educators can design practices that are both visionary
and practical. This synthesis ensures that learning remains meaningful, motivating, and sustainable across
diverse contexts.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 882
www.rsisinternational.org
2. Cognitive Load Theory (CLT)
Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is a psychological framework that emphasises the limitations of working memory
and the importance of designing instruction that reduces unnecessary processing demands (Sweller, 2022).
According to CLT, human working memory is finite, and when instructional materials impose excessive
demands, learners experience overload that hinders comprehension and retention. This is particularly relevant
for novice learners, who lack well-developed schemas and therefore require structured guidance to avoid
cognitive strain (Ashman & Sweller, 2023). Instructional strategies such as worked examples, scaffolding, and
gradual release of responsibility are recommended to optimise learning by aligning with cognitive architecture.
Scholars have extended CLT to digital and online learning, where poorly designed multimedia can add
extraneous load that distracts from core content (Skulmowski & Xu, 2022). In this context, simplicity, clarity,
and careful sequencing become vital for maximising efficiency. The theory thus provides an essential
counterbalance to purely discovery-based models of instruction.
Recent developments in CLT highlight its evolving nature and relevance to modern education, with scholars
examining how individual differences affect learners’ ability to manage cognitive demands (Sweller, 2024). For
example, students with higher prior knowledge or stronger metacognitive skills may handle more complex
problem-solving tasks without overload, while novices require more structured guidance. This variability
underscores the importance of differentiated instruction, where educators adjust strategies based on learners’
readiness levels. Emerging research also explores the role of technology in mitigating or exacerbating cognitive
load, particularly as online platforms become central to education (Ouwehand, Lespiau, Tricot, & Paas, 2025).
Effective use of visual aids, interactive simulations, and adaptive technologies can reduce cognitive demands
and enhance understanding when properly designed. Conversely, poorly structured digital materials can
overwhelm learners with distractions, irrelevant information, or excessive multitasking. CLT thus offers
important insights for both traditional and modern classrooms.
CLT also intersects with motivational perspectives, particularly self-determination theory, offering a holistic
understanding of how cognition and motivation interact during learning (Evans, Vansteenkiste, Parker,
Kingsford-Smith, & Zhou, 2024). Excessive cognitive load can reduce learners’ sense of competence, leading
to frustration and disengagement, whereas well-structured instruction enhances confidence and motivation. By
ensuring that learners experience manageable levels of challenge, teachers support the psychological needs of
autonomy, competence, and relatedness that drive intrinsic motivation. This highlights the importance of
scaffolding, where instructional supports are gradually withdrawn as learners gain proficiency. Such alignment
ensures that educational practices are both cognitively efficient and motivationally supportive. In this way, CLT
complements broader theories of learning by situating cognition within a dynamic motivational context.
Educators who apply this integration are more likely to foster sustained engagement and achievement.
Applications of CLT have extended beyond traditional classrooms to professional and medical training, where
complex tasks require careful management of cognitive demands (Szulewski, Howes, van Merriënboer, &
Sweller, 2021). In such contexts, training programs that begin with guided practice before progressing to
independent performance have been shown to enhance learning outcomes. This approach is equally applicable
in school settings, where gradual release strategies help learners transition from dependence on teacher support
to autonomous problem-solving. By ensuring that students do not face excessive demands too early, educators
create conditions for deeper comprehension and skill mastery. Furthermore, integrating CLT into assessment
design ensures that tasks measure conceptual understanding without overwhelming working memory. This
aligns with the broader principle that education should build durable knowledge rather than short-term
performance. Consequently, CLT has wide-ranging implications across diverse educational domains.
Cognitive Load Theory offers essential insights into the design of effective instruction that respects human
cognitive limitations. Its emphasis on guided learning, schema development, and reduction of extraneous load
provides a strong counterbalance to unstructured discovery methods. By incorporating recent innovations and
acknowledging individual differences, CLT remains highly relevant in both traditional and digital learning
environments. Its integration with motivation theories such as self-determination theory further strengthens its
explanatory power, showing how cognitive efficiency and psychological needs interact to shape learning.
Importantly, CLT offers practical strategies for scaffolding, sequencing, and differentiating instruction to support
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 883
www.rsisinternational.org
diverse learners. For this reason, it remains one of the most influential cognitive frameworks in education today.
Its ongoing refinement ensures continued relevance in addressing contemporary educational challenges.
3. Self-Determination Theory (SDT)
Self-Determination Theory (SDT) provides a robust framework for understanding motivation in education by
emphasizing the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in promoting intrinsic motivation (Ryan et al.,
2022). When students feel that they have meaningful choice and control over their learning, their intrinsic
motivation is enhanced, leading to deeper engagement and persistence in academic tasks (Guay, 2022).
Competence refers to the learner’s sense of effectiveness, which grows when instructional support and feedback
are structured to build mastery gradually (Gagné et al., 2022). Relatedness, on the other hand, reflects the
importance of supportive social relationships in learning, highlighting the role of teachers and peers in fostering
belonging (Ryan, 2023). These three elements are interdependent, meaning that effective motivation emerges
when all needs are met simultaneously. The theory also distinguishes between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation,
noting that reliance solely on rewards or punishments can undermine long-term engagement. As such, SDT
suggests that educational environments must be carefully designed to balance autonomy with guidance and
connection.
In classroom contexts, autonomy-supportive teaching practices are crucial for applying SDT principles
effectively. Teachers who provide students with meaningful choices in assignments or learning activities
encourage a sense of ownership, which enhances motivation (Guay, 2022). At the same time, they structure
lessons in ways that provide necessary guidance and scaffolding to prevent learners from feeling overwhelmed.
Research shows that autonomy-supportive environments lead to higher academic achievement, greater
persistence, and increased creativity in problem-solving (Ryan et al., 2022). For example, when students can
select topics for projects or engage in inquiry-driven activities, they tend to invest more effort and display
stronger intrinsic interest. Teachers can also foster autonomy by adopting non-controlling language, encouraging
reflection, and validating students’ perspectives even when mistakes are made. By positioning students as
partners in the learning process, autonomy-supportive practices align with the democratic ethos of progressivism.
This demonstrates how SDT complements Deweyan philosophy in contemporary education.
Competence is another core element of SDT that has direct implications for instructional design and assessment.
Students develop a sense of competence when they receive constructive feedback, experience success in
appropriately challenging tasks, and perceive progress over time (Gagné et al., 2022). Teachers can foster this
by designing assessments that provide opportunities for growth rather than simply measuring outcomes.
Formative assessments, scaffolded tasks, and opportunities for revision all contribute to building learners’
confidence in their abilities. Research indicates that when students feel competent, they are more likely to adopt
mastery-oriented learning goals, which prioritise understanding over performance (Ryan et al., 2022). This
competence-driven motivation enhances resilience, allowing learners to persist through challenges rather than
avoiding difficult tasks. Importantly, competence is not about perfection but about the perception of gradual and
meaningful progress. This shows the importance of aligning assessment practices with motivational theories to
foster sustained learning.
Relatedness highlights the social dimension of SDT, emphasising that students thrive when they feel supported,
respected, and connected to others in their learning environment (Ryan, 2023). Teachers play a critical role in
creating classroom climates where students feel valued, and peers are encouraged to collaborate rather than
compete. Practices such as group projects, peer mentoring, and class discussions allow students to develop both
academic and social skills simultaneously. Strong relationships also help reduce anxiety and build resilience,
particularly in challenging learning contexts (Chiu, 2022). In online or hybrid settings, maintaining relatedness
requires intentional efforts, such as fostering virtual communities and providing regular personalised feedback.
By prioritising relational support, educators ensure that learners’ motivation is not only cognitively sustainable
but also emotionally grounded. This reflects the holistic perspective of SDT, where motivation is seen as an
outcome of both internal needs and social context. Such insights highlight the inseparability of cognitive and
affective dimensions in education.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 884
www.rsisinternational.org
SDT provides a powerful lens for understanding how motivation can be cultivated in ways that sustain
engagement and promote deeper learning. Its emphasis on autonomy, competence, and relatedness aligns closely
with progressivist and constructivist philosophies that prioritise active, student-centred learning. By integrating
SDT into instructional practices, educators can move beyond surface-level compliance to foster genuine
investment in learning tasks. Research consistently shows that autonomy-supportive environments lead to
improved academic achievement, persistence, and well-being (Ryan et al., 2022). This makes SDT not only a
theoretical model but also a practical guide for designing learning environments that meet both cognitive and
emotional needs. Furthermore, its compatibility with cognitive load theory highlights the importance of
balancing challenge with support to sustain motivation. Together, these theories provide a comprehensive
understanding of how students learn best.
4. Sociocultural and Language Considerations
Sociocultural theories of learning emphasise that education occurs within a social and cultural context, where
language plays a central role in shaping how knowledge is understood and applied. In multilingual classrooms,
the language of instruction is often not the students’ mother tongue, which can create additional barriers to
comprehension and engagement (Cummins, 2000). This situation imposes extraneous cognitive load because
learners must simultaneously decode linguistic structures and process academic content (Skulmowski & Xu,
2022). Such dual demands can hinder working memory efficiency and reduce overall learning outcomes. From
this perspective, sociocultural considerations intersect with cognitive load theory by showing how language can
either support or hinder learning depending on instructional design. Teachers who recognise these challenges
can adapt strategies, such as using visual aids, scaffolding vocabulary, or allowing code-switching, to support
learners. These practices help balance linguistic demands with cognitive processing, enabling more equitable
access to education.
Cultural context also shapes how learners interpret knowledge and engage in classroom practices. Students from
diverse cultural backgrounds may have different expectations regarding participation, collaboration, or authority
in learning settings. For example, some cultures emphasise collective learning and respect for authority, while
others prioritise individual expression and critical questioning (Cummins, 2000). If classroom practices do not
account for these differences, students may feel alienated or less motivated to participate fully. Therefore,
culturally responsive pedagogy becomes essential in bridging the gap between learners’ backgrounds and school
expectations. This involves recognising students’ cultural assets, integrating culturally relevant materials, and
adopting inclusive instructional strategies. Such practices not only enhance engagement but also foster a sense
of belonging and validation. This highlights how sociocultural theory complements progressivist and
motivational perspectives by situating learning within real-world cultural dynamics.
Language barriers also affect assessment practices, as students may underperform not due to a lack of
understanding but because of limited proficiency in the language of instruction. Standardised assessments that
do not accommodate multilingual learners risk misrepresenting their actual knowledge and skills (Cummins,
2000). This creates equity concerns, as students may be unfairly disadvantaged based on linguistic rather than
academic factors. Addressing this requires alternative forms of assessment, such as oral presentations, project-
based evaluations, or bilingual support, that allow students to demonstrate understanding without unnecessary
linguistic strain. Research indicates that multilingual learners benefit from scaffolding strategies such as pre-
teaching vocabulary, using visual organisers, and providing simplified language without diluting academic
content (Skulmowski & Xu, 2022). These adjustments align with cognitive load theory by minimising extraneous
processing. Consequently, equitable assessment practices must integrate sociocultural awareness with cognitive
insights.
In addition to linguistic and cultural factors, sociocultural theory emphasises the role of peer interaction and
community in shaping learning outcomes. Peer collaboration allows students to engage in dialogue that helps
clarify ideas, test hypotheses, and co-construct meaning (Bransford et al., 2000). In multilingual contexts, peers
can also provide translation support or share cultural references that make concepts more relatable. Such
interactions not only support cognitive development but also build social bonds that fulfil motivational needs of
relatedness, as emphasised in SDT (Ryan, 2023). Group work, cooperative projects, and peer tutoring, therefore,
embody the convergence of cognitive, motivational, and sociocultural theories in practice. Importantly, these
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 885
www.rsisinternational.org
practices help students develop empathy, communication skills, and cross-cultural awareness. This integration
demonstrates how learning is simultaneously cognitive, social, and cultural. Teachers who leverage peer
dynamics thus enrich both academic and interpersonal development.
Sociocultural and language considerations highlight the critical role of context in shaping educational outcomes.
They emphasise that learning cannot be separated from linguistic, cultural, and social realities, which deeply
influence how students engage with content. Multilingual classrooms present unique challenges by imposing
additional cognitive demands, but these can be addressed through inclusive instructional strategies. Culturally
responsive pedagogy ensures that learners’ identities and experiences are valued rather than marginalised.
Moreover, sociocultural perspectives align with cognitive load theory and self-determination theory by showing
how language, culture, and social interaction interact with motivation and cognition. Together, these insights
reinforce the importance of designing education that is not only cognitively efficient and motivationally
supportive but also culturally inclusive. This comprehensive perspective ensures that diverse learners are
empowered to thrive in modern classrooms.
LITERATURE REVIEW
African Context
Across sub-Saharan Africa, learner-centred pedagogy (LCP) has been actively promoted through curriculum
reforms and donor-supported initiatives, but the results remain inconsistent. In Uganda, Sikoyo (2010)
highlighted how large class sizes, language diversity, and scarce teaching resources diluted the intended impact
of problem-solving pedagogies. Similarly, Mwalongo (2016) documented Tanzanian teachers’ experiences
where overcrowded classrooms, assessment systems misaligned with learner-centred ideals, and a lack of
resources restricted authentic adoption of progressive teaching. These studies show that while Deweyan ideals
of inquiry and active learning are attractive, their implementation requires structural support, material provision,
and policy alignment. Research further demonstrates that without contextual adaptation, imported pedagogical
models often clash with deeply rooted traditional teaching cultures. Donor-driven reforms sometimes fail to
sustain momentum once external funding or technical assistance diminishes. Thus, African experiences highlight
that policy rhetoric alone cannot transform teaching without considering sociocultural and institutional realities.
In contrast to these challenges, Rwanda presents a positive case of progressivist pedagogy producing measurable
learning outcomes. Mbonimana and Sikubwabo (2024) reported that when active and cooperative learning
strategies were integrated with comprehensive teacher training, classrooms showed improved student
engagement and achievement. The Rwandan government invested heavily in teacher capacity building, textbook
provision, and aligned assessment frameworks that supported learner-centred instruction. These measures
reduced the cognitive and resource burden on teachers, enabling them to consistently implement progressive
practices. Rwanda’s case underscores that LCP thrives when teachers are not only trained but also supported
with continuous mentorship and resource availability. This indicates that reforms must be systemic rather than
piecemeal, linking curriculum design, teacher preparation, and assessment reform. Moreover, community
involvement and political will also emerged as crucial enablers of sustainability.
The African experience demonstrates both the promises and pitfalls of adopting Deweyan progressivism in
diverse contexts. While some nations have achieved localised successes, the majority continue to grapple with
challenges such as misaligned assessments, inadequate teacher preparation, and infrastructural barriers. Lessons
from Uganda and Tanzania emphasise that reform without attention to context often results in superficial
adoption rather than genuine pedagogical transformation. Meanwhile, Rwanda shows that when reforms are
systematically designed and adequately resourced, progressive pedagogies can reshape classroom practice and
learner outcomes. The comparative evidence highlights that success in Africa hinges on a balance between
ambitious educational ideals and grounded contextual realities. Hence, the broader African literature calls for a
cautious but innovative approach that combines Deweyan principles with local adaptations.
Zimbabwe Case Study: Policy and Implementation
Zimbabwe has embarked on ambitious education reforms, emphasising competency-based curricula, learner
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 886
www.rsisinternational.org
nd inclusive education through the Education Sector Strategic Plans (ESSP 20162020; 20212025). According
to MoPSE (2021), these plans aimed to strengthen early literacy, numeracy, and inclusive classroom practices
to ensure no learner was left behind. To support these reforms, the TEACH programme, implemented in
partnership with the Education Development Trust, trained over 17,000 teachers and school leaders by 2023.
The initiative particularly targeted professional standards, foundational teaching skills, and the creation of
supportive school leadership environments. These reforms demonstrate Zimbabwe’s recognition of progressive
pedagogical ideals and its efforts to translate them into actionable strategies. However, the actual classroom
implementation remains far more complex and fragmented.
Despite these strong policy commitments, Zimbabwean classrooms continue to experience a wide gap between
intentions and outcomes. Chimbi and Jita (2022) reported that history teachers found it difficult to sustain
project-based and inquiry-driven activities due to a lack of resources, insufficient time, and pressure to prepare
students for examinations. Similarly, Magudu and Gumbo (2022) highlighted persistent weaknesses in teacher
education institutions (TEIs)school partnerships, which limited the effectiveness of practical training for pre-
service teachers. Mtetwa and Ndemo (2022) further argued that professional development opportunities for in-
service teachers remain irregular and disconnected from the actual demands of classrooms. These findings
highlight how systemic issues, ranging from inadequate training to rigid assessment regimes, limit the potential
of progressive curriculum reforms. The challenges show that teacher empowerment must be central to reform
for lasting transformation to occur.
The Zimbabwean case also illustrates the dangers of policy-practice disjuncture when reform is not accompanied
by holistic support structures. While policies promote active learning, teachers often revert to traditional, lecture-
based methods that guarantee exam success but undermine learner-centred objectives. Moreover, inconsistent
funding and economic instability reduce the government’s ability to sustain reform programmes, particularly in
rural schools with limited infrastructure. The TEACH programme represents progress, yet without continuity
and local ownership, gains may dissipate over time. The Zimbabwean literature suggests that sustained
investment in teacher training, classroom resources, and assessment realignment is essential. Thus, the case
shows that while Zimbabwe is rhetorically aligned with Deweyan ideals, practical realities demand systemic
restructuring to close the policy-implementation gap.
Psychological Analysis of Implementation Gaps
Psychological theories provide insight into why learner-centred pedagogy struggles to gain full traction in
Zimbabwe. Cognitive Load Theory suggests that inquiry-based and problem-solving tasks can overwhelm
learners when they lack adequate foundational skills, particularly in numeracy and literacy (Sweller, 2022;
Ashman & Sweller, 2023). In contexts where classrooms are multilingual and overcrowded, extraneous cognitive
load further increases, reducing students’ ability to process and retain new knowledge (Skulmowski & Xu, 2022).
This means that even when teachers attempt active learning, students may disengage or perform poorly due to
excessive mental demands. Additionally, teachers without strong training in scaffolding techniques may struggle
to reduce unnecessary cognitive load. As a result, learners in Zimbabwe often fail to experience the intended
benefits of progressive education.
Motivational theories also shed light on these challenges, particularly self-determination theory (Ryan et al.,
2022; Gagné et al., 2022). Research shows that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are essential for intrinsic
motivation, yet these conditions are not always met in Zimbabwean classrooms. Learner-centred pedagogy aims
to increase autonomy, but when students lack competence due to weak foundational skills, autonomy can lead
to frustration instead of motivation. Moreover, classrooms with large student-to-teacher ratios make it difficult
for teachers to foster relatedness and individual support. This combination of factors often undermines student
motivation and engagement, limiting the long-term effectiveness of reforms. Without proper scaffolding,
autonomy support, and feedback, progressivist ideals risk collapsing into superficial classroom exercises.
Language and sociocultural considerations also add complexity to implementation in Zimbabwe. Many students
learn in English, which is often a second or third language, leading to increased cognitive and emotional strain
(Cummins, 2000). Multilingual environments create additional barriers to comprehension, making active
learning more demanding than traditional rote methods. This issue is compounded when teachers themselves are
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 887
www.rsisinternational.org
underprepared for teaching in multilingual contexts, leading to communication breakdowns. Consequently,
students may disengage from inquiry-based tasks due to linguistic challenges rather than intellectual capacity.
These findings highlight that professional development must not only focus on pedagogy but also on linguistic
and cultural inclusivity. Thus, psychological perspectives reveal that without addressing cognitive load,
motivation, and language challenges, progressive reforms in Zimbabwe will remain constrained.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND HYBRID PEDAGOGICAL MODEL
1. Hybrid Pedagogy
A hybrid pedagogical model that blends explicit instruction with scaffolded inquiry-based tasks is essential for
balancing Deweyan ideals with Zimbabwe’s classroom realities. Explicit instruction ensures that learners acquire
foundational literacy and numeracy skills without cognitive overload, while inquiry-based activities develop
higher-order reasoning and creativity. By sequencing these approaches, teachers can gradually reduce extraneous
cognitive load and allow students to engage more meaningfully with problem-solving tasks. This scaffolding
process not only promotes knowledge retention but also empowers students to transfer skills to new contexts.
Evidence from both African and global research confirms that balanced models yield stronger outcomes than
either fully traditional or purely progressive approaches. Hence, hybrid pedagogy provides a pragmatic pathway
that acknowledges contextual constraints while sustaining educational innovation.
Implementing hybrid pedagogy requires structured teacher support to ensure effective integration of methods.
Teachers must be trained to recognise when learners need direct instruction and when they are ready for guided
discovery or collaborative inquiry. Without such training, the risk is that teachers may default to teacher-centred
practices or, conversely, overload students with open-ended tasks. Classroom demonstrations, peer observations,
and mentorship programmes could equip teachers with the judgment needed to implement this balance
effectively. Furthermore, curriculum designers should embed clear pedagogical guidelines within subject syllabi
to assist teachers in sequencing instruction. Hybrid pedagogy represents a dynamic compromise between
progressive ideals and Zimbabwe’s systemic realities.
2. Assessment Reform
Assessment reform is critical to ensuring that curriculum ideals align with classroom practice. Current
examinations in Zimbabwe remain dominated by rote memorisation and factual recall, which discourages
teachers from adopting inquiry-based methods. To support progressive pedagogy, assessments must evaluate
problem-solving skills, reasoning abilities, and application of knowledge to real-life contexts. Introducing
project-based assessments and open-ended questions would motivate teachers to design lessons that nurture
critical and creative thinking. Such reforms would reduce the policy-practice gap by harmonising what is taught
and what is tested. Moreover, assessment transformation can shift learner motivation from surface learning to
deep understanding.
However, successful assessment reform requires systemic planning and gradual implementation. Policymakers
must consider piloting alternative assessment models before nationwide adoption to minimise disruption and
resistance. Teacher training on designing and grading innovative assessments is essential to avoid inconsistencies
in evaluation. Additionally, parents and communities must be sensitised to the value of broader learning
outcomes beyond exam scores. Continuous monitoring and research will also be needed to ensure that
assessment innovations improve rather than disadvantage learners, particularly in under-resourced schools.
Therefore, assessment reform should be incremental, inclusive, and evidence-driven to be sustainable.
3. Sustained Professional Development
Short-term workshops alone cannot equip teachers with the capacity to implement learner-centred pedagogy.
Sustained professional development models, such as mentoring, lesson study, and peer learning, offer more
meaningful and long-term growth opportunities. These approaches allow teachers to continuously refine their
instructional practices, share challenges, and co-create solutions in a supportive environment. Lesson study, in
particular, encourages collaborative planning, observation, and reflection, making professional development
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 888
www.rsisinternational.org
directly tied to classroom realities. By engaging in ongoing cycles of improvement, teachers build both
confidence and competence in applying progressive pedagogies. Such sustained approaches foster professional
communities of practice rather than isolated efforts.
Transitioning to this model requires systemic changes in teacher support structures. Education authorities must
allocate time within the school calendar for collaborative professional learning activities. Head teachers and
instructional leaders should also be trained to facilitate mentoring and peer observation effectively. Funding
should be directed toward school-based capacity-building rather than one-off training events that lack follow-
up. Furthermore, linking professional development to performance appraisal systems can incentivise teachers to
continuously improve their practice. Shifting towards sustained professional learning ensures that progressivist
reforms translate into consistent, high-quality classroom instruction.
4. Strengthened TEISchool Partnerships
Teacher education institutions (TEIs) must work more closely with schools to ensure that teacher preparation
aligns with classroom realities. Stronger partnerships would bridge the gap between theory taught in colleges
and the practical demands faced by teachers in schools. Pre-service teachers should undergo extended,
supervised placements in diverse classroom settings where progressive pedagogy is being trialled. This would
ensure that they graduate with both conceptual understanding and practical application skills. By integrating TEI
expertise with in-school mentorship, teacher training can become more coherent and context-sensitive. Effective
partnerships thus play a critical role in sustaining innovation in teacher practice.
Strengthening these partnerships also enhances accountability across the teacher education ecosystem. TEIs can
provide ongoing professional support to graduates, while schools can provide feedback on classroom realities to
shape training curricula. Joint research projects and action learning initiatives could further build evidence-based
strategies for learner-centred pedagogy. Policy frameworks should encourage collaborative agreements between
universities, colleges, and schools to ensure sustained engagement. This model not only enriches teacher
preparation but also creates continuous professional learning networks. As a result, TEIschool partnerships can
function as a vital backbone for progressive education in Zimbabwe.
5. Culturally Relevant Curriculum
For Deweyan ideals to resonate with Zimbabwean learners, curricula must reflect cultural relevance and local
heritage. Embedding inquiry-based tasks in locally meaningful contexts allows students to connect learning with
their lived experiences. For example, problem-solving activities could be based on community agriculture,
heritage conservation, or traditional arts, which makes learning authentic and practical. Such contextualisation
reduces cognitive barriers by linking abstract knowledge to familiar realities. Moreover, a culturally relevant
curriculum promotes learner identity, pride, and motivation to engage in classroom activities. In this way,
progressive pedagogy becomes a tool for empowerment rather than alienation.
Developing such a curriculum requires deliberate collaboration between policymakers, curriculum developers,
and local communities. Teachers should be trained to design lessons that integrate local knowledge systems into
formal learning. Additionally, textbooks and instructional materials should reflect Zimbabwean history,
traditions, and contemporary issues rather than relying heavily on external examples. This approach ensures that
pedagogy is inclusive and meaningful across urban and rural contexts. Beyond academic outcomes, culturally
relevant curricula also strengthen social cohesion and civic values. Thus, grounding Deweyan ideals in
Zimbabwe’s cultural fabric enhances their sustainability and impact.
6. Policy Sequencing
Policy sequencing ensures that progressive reforms are introduced gradually and strategically. Instead of
nationwide implementation, innovative practices such as project-based learning should be piloted in selected
schools. These pilot programmes can provide valuable evidence on feasibility, effectiveness, and resource
requirements. Lessons learned from small-scale trials can then inform more effective national scaling. This
approach reduces resistance, manages risks, and allows continuous refinement of reform models. Sequenced
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 889
www.rsisinternational.org
policy implementation also enables the government to allocate resources more sustainably over time.
Moreover, piloting fosters a culture of experimentation and adaptability within the education system. Schools
that pioneer reforms can serve as centres of excellence and peer learning hubs for other institutions. Teachers in
pilot schools may act as mentors, sharing best practices and challenges with their colleagues across districts.
Policymakers, in turn, can use feedback loops to adjust reform designs before broader rollout. This iterative
approach ensures that reforms remain flexible, context-sensitive, and evidence-driven. Sequencing reforms is
essential for embedding progressive pedagogies in a manner that is both sustainable and scalable in Zimbabwe.
CONCLUSION
Dewey’s progressivist vision remains highly relevant to contemporary African education, as it emphasises
active, learner-centred approaches that foster critical thinking, creativity, and democratic participation. Across
sub-Saharan Africa, policymakers and educators have sought to translate these ideals into practice through
curriculum reforms, teacher training initiatives, and instructional innovations. However, the literature
demonstrates that these aspirations often confront significant contextual challenges, including large class sizes,
limited resources, linguistic diversity, and traditional pedagogical cultures. In Zimbabwe, for example, while
national policies promote competency-based curricula and inclusive education, the realities of classroom
implementation reveal persistent gaps between intended and actual teaching practices. These findings underscore
that Deweyan principles are not inherently incompatible with African education, but their successful adoption
requires careful adaptation to local realities and systemic support.
Evidence from both African and Zimbabwean studies indicates that hybrid pedagogical models provide a
practical pathway for reconciling progressivist ideals with classroom realities. By combining explicit instruction
in foundational skills with scaffolded inquiry-based tasks, hybrid approaches mitigate cognitive overload while
sustaining opportunities for active learning. Complementary strategies, such as culturally relevant curricula,
sequenced policy reforms, and learner-centred assessments, further enhance the effectiveness of these models.
Sustained professional development, mentoring, and TEIschool partnerships play a pivotal role in equipping
teachers to implement these approaches consistently and competently. Collectively, these strategies illustrate
that translating progressive pedagogy into effective practice is not a matter of simple adoption but of systemic
integration that addresses psychological, cultural, and institutional constraints.
Looking forward, there is a pressing need for longitudinal research to evaluate the efficacy of hybrid pedagogical
models in diverse African contexts. Such research should examine not only learning outcomes but also the
differential impacts of reforms across urban and rural schools, socioeconomic strata, and multilingual
classrooms. Investigations into teacher experiences, professional growth, and institutional support systems are
equally critical to understanding the sustainability of these reforms. By generating empirical evidence,
policymakers and educators can refine strategies, scale effective practices, and ensure that Deweyan ideals
translate into meaningful, equitable, and contextually relevant learning experiences for all students.
REFERENCES
1. Ashman, G., & Sweller, J. (2023). What every teacher should know about cognitive load theory and
the importance of cognitive load to instruction. CE Overson, C. M. Hakala, LL Kordonowy, & VA
Benassi (Eds.), In their own words: What scholars and teachers want you to know about why and how
to apply the science of learning in your academic setting, 185-195.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience,
and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Chimbi, G. T., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Policy failures with learner-centred pedagogy: Case studies from
Zimbabwe. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning.
4. Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in
online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 54(sup1), S14-S30.
5. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual
Matters.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
Page 890
www.rsisinternational.org
6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour.
Springer.
7. Education Development Trust (EDT). (2023). TEACH Zimbabwe: Teacher effectiveness and equitable
access for all children. Retrieved from https://www.edt.org
8. Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P., Kingsford-Smith, A., & Zhou, S. (2024). Cognitive load
theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Educational
Psychology Review, 36(1), 7.
9. Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau,
X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature
Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378-392.
10. Guay, F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulation types, psychological
needs, and autonomy supporting behaviours. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75-92.
11. Magudu, S., & Gumbo, M. T. (2022). Teacher education partnerships in Zimbabwe: Challenges and
opportunities. South African Journal of Higher Education.
12. Mbonimana, S., & Sikubwabo, C. (2024). Learner-centred pedagogy in Rwanda: Effects on learning
outcomes. African Journal of Empirical Research.
13. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (MoPSE). (2021). Education Sector Strategic Plan
(ESSP 20212025). Government of Zimbabwe.
14. Mtetwa, D. K. J., & Ndemo, Z. (2022). Continuing professional learning for teachers in Zimbabwe.
African Journal of Teacher Education and Development.
15. Mwalongo, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about ICT for teaching, professional development,
administration and personal use. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 7(3).
16. Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive load theory: Emerging trends and
innovations. Education Sciences, 15(4), 458.
17. Ryan, R. M. (Ed.). (2023). The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory. Oxford University
Press.
18. Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L.
(2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings
evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11-12), 813.
19. Sikoyo, L. (2010). Contextual challenges of implementing learner-centred pedagogy in Uganda.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 247263.
20. Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A
new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 34(1), 171-196.
21. Sweller, J. (2022). The role of evolutionary psychology in our understanding of human cognition:
Consequences for cognitive load theory and instructional procedures. Educational Psychology
Review, 34(4), 2229-2241.
22. Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual
Differences, 110, 102423.
23. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
24. Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2021). From theory to practice: the
application of cognitive load theory to the practice of medicine. Academic Medicine, 96(1), 24-30.