
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue X October 2025
www.rsisinternational.org
be actively constructed by learners through engagement with real-world contexts. Constructivist theory builds
on these ideas by emphasising that learners interpret new information in light of prior knowledge, which shapes
how they organise and retain learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). Both perspectives prioritise student
agency, suggesting that learners develop a deeper understanding when they can explore, question, and apply
concepts in authentic ways. The teacher in this framework becomes a facilitator, guiding students while allowing
them freedom to explore ideas independently and collaboratively. Classroom practices, therefore, include hands-
on projects, problem-solving tasks, and interactive discussions that mirror real-life decision-making. This vision
positions the classroom as a living laboratory for intellectual growth and democratic participation.
Central to Dewey’s progressivism is the concept of “learning by doing,” which asserts that learners understand
concepts more deeply when they can act on them in practical ways (Dewey, 1916). For instance, conducting
experiments in science, simulating economic transactions in business studies, or engaging in role-play in social
studies can transform abstract concepts into meaningful, memorable experiences. Constructivist research
confirms this by showing that students develop stronger mental models when they actively interact with content
rather than passively receive information (Bransford et al., 2000). These practices also reinforce metacognitive
awareness, as learners reflect on their approaches and adjust strategies accordingly. In turn, students learn to
view mistakes not as failures but as opportunities for growth, which cultivates resilience and adaptive thinking.
Teachers, therefore, play a critical role in scaffolding these experiences, ensuring that students are supported as
they navigate complex concepts. This cycle of action, reflection, and adjustment is at the heart of progressivist
and constructivist learning.
Another important element of Deweyan progressivism is its democratic ethos, which frames the classroom as a
microcosm of society where students practice skills of dialogue, negotiation, and shared responsibility (Dewey,
1916). Constructivist principles support this by emphasising the role of social interaction in learning,
highlighting that collaboration enables learners to co-construct meaning and gain multiple perspectives
(Bransford et al., 2000). Group projects, cooperative problem-solving, and peer feedback exercises embody these
ideas by creating contexts where students learn from one another. Such practices not only enhance academic
achievement but also build social competencies such as empathy, communication, and cultural awareness. By
fostering inclusive and participatory learning environments, teachers help students see knowledge as a shared
resource rather than a private possession. This prepares learners for active roles in democratic societies where
dialogue and cooperation are crucial. In this sense, education becomes simultaneously intellectual, moral, and
social.
While Deweyan and constructivist approaches are influential, they are not without critique, as some argue that
overly unstructured inquiry may lead to superficial understanding if learners are left without sufficient guidance
(Dewey, 1916). Similarly, constructivist classrooms can be challenging to implement in large or under-resourced
settings, where individualised attention and scaffolding are difficult to provide. Standardised testing systems
also pose barriers, as they prioritise memorisation and uniformity over exploration and critical thinking.
Nevertheless, empirical evidence suggests that when implemented effectively, progressivist and constructivist
practices foster deeper comprehension, creativity, and problem-solving skills (Bransford et al., 2000). The
challenge lies in balancing freedom with structure, ensuring that learners have both autonomy and support.
Teachers who integrate explicit instruction with inquiry-based tasks often achieve the most successful outcomes.
Such a balance allows these theories to remain practical as well as philosophically appealing.
Deweyan progressivism and constructivism provide a foundational framework for learner-centred education that
emphasises agency, experience, and collaboration. They challenge teacher-centred models by shifting the focus
toward active, participatory learning that connects with students’ real lives. Their emphasis on democratic
practice and social interaction highlights the interconnected cognitive, social, and ethical purposes of education.
While challenges of implementation exist, these theories remain highly influential in shaping progressive
curriculum and pedagogy. Importantly, their integration with psychological frameworks such as cognitive load
theory and self-determination theory enhances their applicability in modern classrooms. By situating these
philosophies within a broader evidence-based framework, educators can design practices that are both visionary
and practical. This synthesis ensures that learning remains meaningful, motivating, and sustainable across
diverse contexts.