The table reveals key learning gaps in the foundational reading, writing, and arithmetic skills among students,
shedding light on areas requiring targeted interventions. Each skill area was evaluated based on specific sub-
skills, providing a nuanced understanding of student performance.
DISCUSSION
Reading Skills
The reading assessment revealed vocabulary (3.858, "average") as the strongest sub-skill, followed by fluency
(3.468, "average"). However, comprehension scored the lowest (2.847, "below average"), revealing a substantial
learning gap in understanding and interpreting a text. This aligns with Pretorius and Currin (2019), who
emphasized that many learners, especially in under-resourced settings, can decode words but struggle to derive
meaning from texts. Poor comprehension skills can be attributed to limited exposure to varied reading materials
and insufficient practice with critical thinking tasks, such as making inferences and analyzing context.
The learning gap in reading comprehension has broader implications. This suggests that students struggle to
engage deeply with texts, limiting their ability to derive meaning, critically analyze, and synthesize information.
Without strong comprehension, students cannot fully engage with other subjects, limiting their ability to learn
from written instructions or analyze problems in arithmetic and writing. A study by Duke et al. (2018) found that
students who struggle with comprehension tend to have difficulties in higher-order thinking, including making
inferences and understanding complex texts. Educators should implement explicit comprehension strategies such
as question-answering, summarizing, and text discussion to bridge this gap. Additionally, classroom interventions
like guided reading sessions, peer reading, and the use of diverse and contextually relevant texts can enhance
reading comprehension (Aladro, 2021). Policymakers must prioritize equitable access to books and literacy
resources to ensure students in rural or marginalized areas are not left behind.
Arithmetic Skills
Arithmetic showed notable strengths in basic operations (3.792, "average") and foundational number sense
(3.589, "average"), suggesting that students possess a reasonable grasp of arithmetic fundamentals. However,
word problems scored the lowest (2.897, "below average"), indicating a significant gap in students' ability to
apply mathematical concepts to practical situations. This aligns with Siegler et al. (2020), who argue that
problem-solving is a complex skill requiring both procedural fluency and critical reasoning.
The gap in solving word problems likely stems from limited classroom exposure to real-world math applications.
Indicating difficulty in applying theoretical knowledge to practical, real-world scenarios, requiring stronger
integration of critical thinking and math literacy. Students may be unable to decode problem scenarios, relate
them to mathematical operations, and construct logical solutions. Research by Van de Rijt and Van Groenestijn
(2017) shows that students who struggle with word problems have gaps in applying math concepts to real-life
scenarios. This skill is particularly critical as it forms the basis for applied mathematics in higher education and
real-life contexts such as budgeting or measurements. To address this, educators should integrate word problems
into daily lessons and use collaborative learning strategies like group problem-solving and discussion.
Policymakers should support teacher training initiatives focused on applied and contextualized mathematics
education.
Writing Skills
The writing assessment revealed average performance in spelling (3.568) and structure (3.426), while creative
writing (2.650, "below average") showed the largest gap. These results align with Graham and Harris (2019),
who found that creative writing requires higher-order thinking skills like planning, organizing, and elaborating,
which many students struggle to develop due to limited exposure to imaginative writing tasks.
The gap in creative writing stresses a lack of opportunities for students to express their thoughts and ideas freely.
This points out a lack of imagination and originality in expressing ideas, compounded by limited opportunities
for self-expression and exploration of narrative forms. This affects not only their writing skills but also their